![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I lost almost $5,000 from BTC-E. They do not respond to tickets. There is no telephone number or address. If the Wikipedia article is uncritical and does not mention the many complaints about similar issues, then others will also loose their money to this dishonest outfit. Please let the comment stand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.73.233 ( talk) 20:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Can you re-add the semi-protect here: [1] as the vandalism is ongoing, IRWolfie- ( talk) 18:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
...has been mentioned at this page I wrote. You may be interested in seeing the point it's trying to convey. -- Gryllida ( talk) 20:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for clarifying how page moves are supposed to happen, and for cleaning up the issue I created with split history on the Lafarge page. I should have realized something like that might happen. Anyway, I much appreciate the feedback and help and will keep it in mind next time it comes up. Alafarge ( talk) 18:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
It isn't exactly obvious. Re: the edit, no problem. After reading the puff piece I had to vent and I knew that someone would revert it before the whack job tried to sue everybody over three inches tall. I stand by the veracity of edit; she is thoroughly evil. Ask her own family all of whom she maliciously libels at every opportunity. Every one of her limited "rescues" is 100% about promoting herself and only herself. She cannot be confused with even by the most expansive and confused definition of "born again". She's narcissistic to a frighteningly pathological degree. She makes Glenn Close's character look downright inviting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.27.57.2 ( talk) 21:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
uhm. hi. i am making lots of creative and reasonable edits to pages but u keep deleting them and undoing them pls stop! its really annoying — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArianasBeauty ( talk • contribs) 19:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
I accidentally edited the Tom Morello article to remove the sentence, "Tom is also a communist" in the "Persona Life" section. When I tried to change it back, you said it was not constructive. Then I tried again, and you thought it was vandalism. Rest assured that I was merely trying to correct my accidental change to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.133.65.222 ( talk) 20:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the moving to rename tip - I posted the rename request on the Safenet talk page. Timtempleton ( talk) 20:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Your reversal of my edit was somewhat proprietorial of you. In my opinion, which is as good as yours, the changes I made were constructive, especially as I intended to link to the section from another article. On what grounds do you consider my amendment unconstuctive??? I added to the section without taking anything away. In all my years in editing Wikipedia I have never reversed any well-intentioned amendment by another contributor, even when I didn't consider it an improvement myself Plucas58 ( talk) 19:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi There
I keep trying to remove my page (Neal King) and you and others keep restoring it - and you accused me of vandalism! I confess I'm not a wiki expert and am ignorant of protocol so please allow me to ask in all humility - how do I remove my page?
kind regards. Neal King Tertel ( talk) 22:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
greetings
so I got a notice that I now seem to be involved in an "edit war" - which I guess has some validity as the page bearing my name now seems to have become fertile ground for disgruntled former employees of my last institution to post all manner of incendiary inaccuracies, which I am attempting to at least balance - I would value your advice - thanks!
Neal King Tertel ( talk) 21:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Greeting and in response to Tertel,
Wikipedia is not Facebook or MySpace, people are able to make contributions to someones Wikipedia site living or dead and it is the discretion of Wikipedia staff to make sure those additions follow site rules. It is my understanding that the 'tone' of the article has to be as neutral as possible and facts can be contributed based on truth found in articles, pdf files, video files, etc. These are either references from third party reputable websites or from within other Wikipedia articles.
The 'Neal King' Wikipedia site has recent additions that are both of this 'negative' nature you are protesting and fleshing out more of the history behind Neal King. Continuing to try and remove the page entirely or delete massive sections is both a violation, in my understand, of 'Vandalism' and a 'Conflict of Interest' policies on this website.
I have been updating the 'Neal King' Wikipedia page and I can though assure you Tertel and Excirial I am not and never have been an employee of your former employer, Sofia University. I am however a citizen wishing to contribute the facts by way of many, many references to ensure I comply with the rules of this wonderful site.
I would absolutely not continue an 'edit war' with you if you would not mass delete my contributions to the wikipage 'Neal King'. You do not own that webpage.
I would appreciate any 'positive' contributions or additional articles that might show "your side of the story..." as it seems you believe we have sides in this "edit war".
Thank you for any moderation you can assist us with to solve this issue, Excirial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Battlecrow ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I was responding to a discussion where you had previously commented, and as I am using Dot's syntax highlighter, I saw everything highlighted in a shade of gray, corresponding to an unenclosed HTML tag. This makes most of the text on the screen somewhat illegible, and seems to have been caused by oddly nested tags in your signature:
[[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contact me</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup>
(offending tags highlighted)Would you mind changing your signature so that the link to your userpage terminates after the font tag closes? This would change your sig to:
[[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial'''</font>]]<sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contact me</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup>
Thank you very much! APerson talk! 21:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
You should revoke talk page access it seems.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 20:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
History Colorado may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
( t) Josve05a ( c) 19:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for reverting all those edits at The WikiProject, and blocking the user. Thanks, Mat ty. 007 21:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC) |
I'm sorry that you believed I was trying to vandalize any pages. My account was compromised by a group of hackers, and as such, they took advantage of the opportunity to abuse the access to mess with Wiki pages. My sincerest apologies. TannerNorad ( talk) 01:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Excirial! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
You protected Kiss in 2011. It is now 2014. Please could you unprotect it now. 182.250.240.90 ( talk) 03:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
I have begun sending barnstars to participants at the WikiProject Articles for creation/December 2013 - January 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. I plan on sending out the rest shortly, and will post updates here as they occur.
All Done. The awarding process is now completed.
NorthAmerica
1000
11:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
I noticed when you histmerged User:Thebigshadiw/sandbox into Adam Jones (lacrosse), you grabbed a few extra revisions. Can you delete Adam Jones (lacrosse), undelete the earliest 2 revisions, move them back to User:Thebigshadiw/sandbox, then undelete the rest of the revisions? (The reason I'm concerned about this is that automated counts currently give me credit for starting the article instead of its actual author). Thanks, Jackmcbarn ( talk) 19:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! I see that you blocked Hardrock4ever ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) earlier today. I declined an unblock request for him. Looking a little later, I saw edits by Kj198 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). While I'm assuming good faith, I can't help but think, given the interest in the same topics, the two might have some connection. Since you're the blocking admin on the first account, I wanted to bring this to your attention. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Excirial, I have reported the issue, and requested that you and TJRC be blocked from the page. Thank you.
You might want to see the above. -- S.G.(GH) ping! 20:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Excirial,
Im actually making a page on of a golfer name fabrice etiennette and with some other collegue we are facing problem due to all link and material to construct the article and we need time to re group all of this! our article is actually on a deletion spot can you be good with us and make our article safe for some time then we can still work and make it as proper as it should for the wikipedia world and also for this golfer world as he has faced problem in this early life of pro golfer.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdemall ( talk • contribs) 18:53, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
The sub page to record reviews doesnt appear to be working for me Makro ( talk) 18:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
The page I edited was deleted as it was not seen as constructive? I was merely adding the correct facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.152.224.199 ( talk) 20:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
that was fast! sorry about the "complete utter stupid bullshit" or whatever it was that i wrote. otherwise i really think the edit should be kept ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.119.141.3 ( talk) 21:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
related comment
Thanks for the help with the link! We are currently working on fixing all of the banners we just placed. Loving the Wikipedia love :-)
DrX (
talk)
21:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi I have been editing the TIGA page - I work for TIGA, but can also assure you all the edits were entirely accurate, is is possible to revert? I am happy to collaborate on creating a more neutral tone, if genuinely needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DAField ( talk • contribs) 21:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi @ Excirial:, AFC Buddy is giving me undeserved extra credit. I reviewed Jay A. Levy, M.D., but forgot to check for copyvio. Realizing my mistake, I undid my review and then failed for the copyvio. Problem is AFCBuddy is counting it as two reviews, not one as it should. I'm not sure the best way to fix this, but thought I should bring it to your attention. Thanks! 78.26 ( I'm no IP, talk to me!) 20:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
My page is promotional.However, every time I try and make a page that isn't promotional you delete me while I'm making the page. I'm trying to create a page about my company as a lot of my interns coming from england find it hard to understand the russian website. The page is factual not promotional. Promotional implies bias which it isn't. If you feel I written biased info tell where it is and I'll delete it. I keep having my page deleted by different "monitors" and so I'm to explain myself ever time. Could please help/ Advise me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yours Ambassadors Work and Studies Abroad Unsigned comment signed for User:Independent information 07:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Does AFCBuddy add reviews I have done before signing up, or do I need to add those manually? Thanks,
Samwalton9 (
talk) 14:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC) Nevermind I answered my own question!
Samwalton9 (
talk)
18:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Saw you busy reverting the vandals (and beating me to the reverts
![]() |
![]() |
The hot and dry patience award |
For your calm patience with the nonsense at Sahara. Not many admins would be patient enough to warn and warn again up to however many before blocking. Please have a cold (fairly) strong dry drink on me (pictured left), to help you deal with the nonsense going on at that hot dry location (and anywhere else). -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 21:26, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Excirial, curious as to why my additions were reversed and deemed inappropriate. I simply added another online pawn shop to the list that existed before the others as well as provided additional information with regard to interest rates being charged by these pawn shops. The statement of 4% to 8% per month interest is not entirely true. I've been following this industry for some time now and whats been posted with regard to internet pawns is lopsided and needs to be corrected. If you'd like me to spend more time on it I'd be glad to. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zerobreach ( talk • contribs) 22:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation Excirial, makes complete sense.
Hi Excirial I am Lotfinia there is a problem you need to be aware of I believe. I have received another post from you explaining your changes to my edits but I didn’t make those edits in the first place. The first time you notified me was 2/21/13 regarding Meridian Mississippi and now about CoverGirl- 3/5/14. I dismissed the first one because I knew it was an error. I can assure you of the very few edits done by me none were on either topic since I limit my occasional edits to either the Ancient World and royalty edit. I understand goof ups and cross wires I just want you know we have been a victims of such events. I appreciate all the work and effort you and the other really active folks do for Wikipedia and myself, thank you. Respectfully Lotfinia Lotfinia ( talk) 14:53, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
If you connect to the internet your Internet Service Provider (ISP) will provide you with a so-called IP Address, an unique number that can identify your connection over the internet. This IP is both used to determine where you are, and who you are. Using the IP adress a website like Wikipedia can determine who asked it to do something - be it retrieving an article, be it editing a page or otherwise. If you are not logged into an account Wikipedia will only recognize you as an IP address. Once you are logged into an account it will recognize you as that user instead (Wikipedia will still know the IP address, but it knows it should address you as a specific user instead).
This is where the diagram to the right comes into play. Imagine we have two editors - one who is doing good work, and one who is just trying to vandalize pages. In this example both editors are not logged into an account and as of such their edits are only recognized as being made by their unique IP address. Like any other editors, IP addresses have talk pages that are used for communication towards them. If such an IP editor vandalizes, they will receive a warning that will be placed on their talk page.
This is where some technical stuff comes into play. While an IP Address is unique it only identifies a connection, and not a user. Most ISP's actually have what is called an Address pool, a large set of unique addresses that they can give to their users once they connect to the internet. In most cases an ISP will not give a subscriber the same address every time they connect to the internet. Instead it will look at its pool of addresses and determine which ones not in use yet, and give the subscriber one of these. Just compare it to a hotel: If you rent a room you will receive a random one, and the hotel will not keep your room reserved between your various stays.
Since IP addresses shift between various people it might occur that you may receive an IP address that was previously used by a vandal. If this occurs the talk page of that editor will still contain warning for previous acts of vandalism. So all of a sudden you might end up seeing a boatload of warnings for editors you never made in the first place. To emphasize this - the warnings you saw were targeted at this IP's talk page as opposed to your user accounts talk page. If you look at the contributions made by the IP address you will probably see several more editors that you never made.
There is actually quite a bit more technical stuff involved and the above explanation is a simplified version. Still i hope it explains what happened here, why the warning were there and why you see them even though you were not their target. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 20:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
yo, just dropping in with a q for you...
Just wondering why you changed my comment saying that Valentina Tereshkova is not the biggest Russian babe? like do you know what she did for her country? like WTF man?! im just saying that her hair is amazing and would you look at all those medals, like jeez someones accomplished... so like im just saying cmon man that chicks hot and i feel as if you shouldnt change it cuz shes hot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F8F0:C10:FFF:200:5EFE:CE57:AA1F ( talk) 21:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
You or someone else said scratching her "ass", I didn't think that was appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.22.118.166 ( talk) 20:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, You undid my edit of this page. I changed the cinematographer's first name from Low to Lol. Check out the IMDB page for this movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2304771/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm. It does seem to be Lol, not Low, that's why I changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldnihao ( talk • contribs) 21:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
A certain similarity between [2] and my username? Doubt that the editor is actually a fan. Dougweller ( talk) 18:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
There is a bug while I'm using Huggle 3, when I report a user to WP:AIV with the selected diffs the older ones are instead selected. Are you experiencing this too? Eye snore ( pc) 21:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello User:Excirial, Thank you for your help. I have noticed that in the particular page, multiple IPs have been doing the same vandalism again and again, and when prevented they leave impolite messages on the page. Do you think it'd be a good idea to add some protection to the page? Coderzombie ( talk) 03:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
User:109.156.190.13 is abusing their talk page after being blocked, so could you revoke their talk page access? Thanks. Lugia2453 ( talk) 19:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Vandals are still getting too many chances, thanks to HG3's misreading of previous warnings. Just happened twice at User talk:71.42.80.130,for instance. Could you prompt Petrb to look into this? — SMALL JIM 20:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
In this page, when a user warning has been placed anyone else than you, the numbers in each user won't get updated, which can result in misplaced user warnings. In Huggle 2.1.22 everything looks okay and stable. Eye snore ( pc) 00:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Hey there Excirial, Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive/Technical 13 has been edited twice by the script since this chunk of reviews and isn't showing them in the log. I'll note that Template:AFC statistics wasn't updating during that time (which caused me to quit reviewing because I couldn't get a fresh list) due to server issues for Earwigbot. Not sure how those issues affected your script, if at all. — {{U| Technical 13}} ( t • e • c) 23:48, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Excirial, some examples of accepted drafts are:
which afcbuddy isn't picking up on yet. :) — {{U| Technical 13}} ( t • e • c) 22:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Publishing accepted [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] submission
" -- this is more general and correctly handles cases in which reviewers are accepting templates and the like. This should hopefully be the last change! :)
Theopolisme (
talk)
00:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Hi there, I would like you to consider removing the page /info/en/?search=Tony_Anthony_(evangelist) As new substantial evidence has come to light via these websites www.forthesakeofthegospel.co.uk and www.framingthetiger.com This new evidence proves the allegations made against him in the wiki page are unfounded, misleading and libellous. I believe there may be forthcoming legal lawsuits against those involved in making this page public. Please review the above websites and I am sure you will conclude that the page needs to be deleted.
John (favourofGod) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FavourofGod ( talk • contribs) 23:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello sir, on the 19th of March, 2014 I edited and contributed to the "Alphie" page on Wikipedia.
Despite these changes being correct, and beneficial, you deleted them. I ask of you to reinstate that article on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF9B:9AB0:2083:46AC:F45A:EBEE ( talk) 21:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Recently you reverted my edit on the Sergio Aragones page, in the Appearances in popular culture section. I changed "hosting the only "Actual Comic Book Booth" at Comic Con 2010" to "hosting the "Last Actual Comic Book Booth" at Comic Con 3010." While a minor edit, I do believe Wikipedia should be as accurate as possible. Please view these two pictures for evidence to support my change. The first change (only to "Last"): Picture 1. The second change (2010 to 3010): Picture 2. Both of these picture can be found at this Web page. Thank you. JDCAce ( talk) 05:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Excirial, Please could you help me out here? Thank you! — JOHNMOORofMOORLAND ( talk) 10:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
You left a comment on my talk page about an edit I recently made on the 1776 (company) page about explaining my deletion. I am currently in the process of writing the explanation (I've been having this particular section repeatedly inserted against consensus) and want to make it a thorough explanation. Thanks for reviewing KAIdc ( talk) 19:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Excirial. Do you think that we should perhaps protect this page for a while? It is constantly hit with vandalism. Hoops gza ( talk) 00:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey Excirial, just wanted you to know wi11337 is a friend of mine and he asked me to make an edit on his page, anything, and that there's no need to revert it. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.185.0 ( talk) 19:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I am an intern for the Association for a more Just Society, and updated the Wikipedia page per my supervisor's request. For all of the information, I merely copied and pasted from our website. If I did not cite the website as a source appropriately, could you help me with this? Otherwise, I don't understand the problem. All of the information was with regards to the mission of the organization or the specific activities that they engage in. Your reply to my update stated that the page did not take a neutral stance. Were the Christian references too explicit? Would it still work to talk about the Christian mission of the organization? Thanks for your help,
Sincerely,
Ian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idkennedy74 ( talk • contribs) 19:43, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
In some ways I love the new multiple changes feature in the watch list and in other ways I dislike. There was a recent series of three edits to For Today (band). Two "different" anons: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=For_Today_%28band%29&diff=603039122&oldid=602383522 and https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=For_Today_%28band%29&diff=603039494&oldid=603039122. You reverted the second: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=For_Today_(band)&diff=603039514&oldid=603039494 but left the first, which is all that showed when I looked at the diff. I reverted rather than selecting undo. That reverts only the edits of the most recent editor: you. It also left the article with both unconstructive edits in-place. I have fixed it all and wish I could revert my revert of your material because it was clearly correct. Sorry for any confusion this caused. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 00:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Would you mind letting me know why you stopped my User - Save Manston Airport?
IT is a cause very dear to my heart and we put a lot of effort into it.
Best regards, Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.205.150 ( talk) 16:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello! You left a note on my page to say you undid my edits to the Fallas page. Little unclear why because I just added a paragraph stating that the main falla is burned separately from all the others, and where it is located and a few other bits of info. The article says it needed improvement so I thought I had improved it by adding some extra detail. I love the fallas and the page as it stands does not do them justice. I thought adding a little further information would be beneficial. I live in Spain so the info is authentic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boojoo1 ( talk • contribs) 19:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
You reverted my changes to this article and explained that they "did not appear constructive". I am entirely baffled as to why you would make this statement or change my edits; the additions I made not only added detail to the article, but removed incorrect information and improved the grammar. In addition, your revert was done within moments of my edits being saved, leading me to wonder how carefully they were reviewed. Though you seem to be genuinely attempting to improve Wikipedia, this is the kind of capricious behavior that leads people to avoid contributing. The article is better with my edits, and I prevail upon you to revert them and stop this nonsense. 206.174.34.147 ( talk) 20:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello.
I'm not somebody who edits wikipedia. It was brought to my attention that the wikipedia entry of my publication had been defaced. After looking at the content created, I'm quite sure I know who it is.
When I went to discuss this, I was given a "last warning" to stop defacing pages. This ip address is shared by an entire office essentially. I would like the wikipedia community, whom both I and my publication respect the work of, that no edit or statement coming from this ip address is sanctioned by the people who pay the bills for it. Constructive edits may have also happened, I wouldnt know.
We are investigating and somebody will be no longer touching computers in this building.
We appologize for the trouble caused and the clean up work.
Gerry Bello. Online Managing Editor Columbus Free Press — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.219.92.202 ( talk) 04:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Dear Sir or Madam, I think, with all respect, your removal of the hermione2015.com external link is not fair. I say this only as there is an external link to the French group in wikipedia. It is hermione.com.
So I feel this is a double standard.
I look forward to your reply.
Pls appreciate I do not pretend to be a wiki expert, I simply wanted to update this entry with the fact the frigate is returning to the US in 2015 and there's a group and website that supports this effort, and it is NOT commercial (or a commercial). It is a non-profit 501 c 3 registered, etc.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lafayette1780 ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
I am sending you this message because you listed yourself on meta:Huggle/Members as a beta tester. We desperately need attention of testers, because since we resolved all release blockers, we are ready to release first official version of huggle 3! Before that happens, it would be nice if you could test it so that we can make sure there are no issues with it. You can download it packaged for your operating system (see Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta) or you can of course build it yourself, see https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx for that. Don't forget to use always latest version, there is no auto-update message for beta versions!
Should you find any issue, please report it to wikimedia bugzilla, that is a central place for huggle bugs, where we look at them. That is i mportant, if you find a bug and won't report it, we can't fix it. Thank you for your work on this, if you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page, I won't be looking for responses here. Thanks, Petrb ( talk) 15:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for warning this user. I was just in position to report it at WP:AIV because oh his/her rapid vandalism in Tango. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 18:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is the correct method of going about this but I would like help with arbitration over an edit war on the Threads page and talk page on the subject of the condition of a character's baby, the script for which is below:
Whereas the baby is visibly deformed on-screen, explicit reference is neither made to stillbirth or deformity; both however are implied: the baby is "silent", which suggests that the infant is dead, and Jane looks away with "horror and disgust" which suggests that there is something to be disgusted about, it will be more clear for having watched the final 5-10 minutes of the film which can be found on YouTube. It should also be noted that it is set after a nuclear war. I have made my case on the talk page (mine at the bottom, a second was made last year by another user). Hayek79 ( talk) 12:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Edit: Sources that support my case can be found on the page itself (unless they have since been removed by User:Nick Cooper). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayek79 ( talk • contribs) 12:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I lost almost $5,000 from BTC-E. They do not respond to tickets. There is no telephone number or address. If the Wikipedia article is uncritical and does not mention the many complaints about similar issues, then others will also loose their money to this dishonest outfit. Please let the comment stand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.64.73.233 ( talk) 20:07, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Can you re-add the semi-protect here: [1] as the vandalism is ongoing, IRWolfie- ( talk) 18:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
...has been mentioned at this page I wrote. You may be interested in seeing the point it's trying to convey. -- Gryllida ( talk) 20:18, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for clarifying how page moves are supposed to happen, and for cleaning up the issue I created with split history on the Lafarge page. I should have realized something like that might happen. Anyway, I much appreciate the feedback and help and will keep it in mind next time it comes up. Alafarge ( talk) 18:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
It isn't exactly obvious. Re: the edit, no problem. After reading the puff piece I had to vent and I knew that someone would revert it before the whack job tried to sue everybody over three inches tall. I stand by the veracity of edit; she is thoroughly evil. Ask her own family all of whom she maliciously libels at every opportunity. Every one of her limited "rescues" is 100% about promoting herself and only herself. She cannot be confused with even by the most expansive and confused definition of "born again". She's narcissistic to a frighteningly pathological degree. She makes Glenn Close's character look downright inviting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.27.57.2 ( talk) 21:16, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
uhm. hi. i am making lots of creative and reasonable edits to pages but u keep deleting them and undoing them pls stop! its really annoying — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArianasBeauty ( talk • contribs) 19:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
I accidentally edited the Tom Morello article to remove the sentence, "Tom is also a communist" in the "Persona Life" section. When I tried to change it back, you said it was not constructive. Then I tried again, and you thought it was vandalism. Rest assured that I was merely trying to correct my accidental change to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.133.65.222 ( talk) 20:11, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the moving to rename tip - I posted the rename request on the Safenet talk page. Timtempleton ( talk) 20:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Your reversal of my edit was somewhat proprietorial of you. In my opinion, which is as good as yours, the changes I made were constructive, especially as I intended to link to the section from another article. On what grounds do you consider my amendment unconstuctive??? I added to the section without taking anything away. In all my years in editing Wikipedia I have never reversed any well-intentioned amendment by another contributor, even when I didn't consider it an improvement myself Plucas58 ( talk) 19:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi There
I keep trying to remove my page (Neal King) and you and others keep restoring it - and you accused me of vandalism! I confess I'm not a wiki expert and am ignorant of protocol so please allow me to ask in all humility - how do I remove my page?
kind regards. Neal King Tertel ( talk) 22:08, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
greetings
so I got a notice that I now seem to be involved in an "edit war" - which I guess has some validity as the page bearing my name now seems to have become fertile ground for disgruntled former employees of my last institution to post all manner of incendiary inaccuracies, which I am attempting to at least balance - I would value your advice - thanks!
Neal King Tertel ( talk) 21:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Greeting and in response to Tertel,
Wikipedia is not Facebook or MySpace, people are able to make contributions to someones Wikipedia site living or dead and it is the discretion of Wikipedia staff to make sure those additions follow site rules. It is my understanding that the 'tone' of the article has to be as neutral as possible and facts can be contributed based on truth found in articles, pdf files, video files, etc. These are either references from third party reputable websites or from within other Wikipedia articles.
The 'Neal King' Wikipedia site has recent additions that are both of this 'negative' nature you are protesting and fleshing out more of the history behind Neal King. Continuing to try and remove the page entirely or delete massive sections is both a violation, in my understand, of 'Vandalism' and a 'Conflict of Interest' policies on this website.
I have been updating the 'Neal King' Wikipedia page and I can though assure you Tertel and Excirial I am not and never have been an employee of your former employer, Sofia University. I am however a citizen wishing to contribute the facts by way of many, many references to ensure I comply with the rules of this wonderful site.
I would absolutely not continue an 'edit war' with you if you would not mass delete my contributions to the wikipage 'Neal King'. You do not own that webpage.
I would appreciate any 'positive' contributions or additional articles that might show "your side of the story..." as it seems you believe we have sides in this "edit war".
Thank you for any moderation you can assist us with to solve this issue, Excirial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Battlecrow ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I was responding to a discussion where you had previously commented, and as I am using Dot's syntax highlighter, I saw everything highlighted in a shade of gray, corresponding to an unenclosed HTML tag. This makes most of the text on the screen somewhat illegible, and seems to have been caused by oddly nested tags in your signature:
[[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contact me</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup>
(offending tags highlighted)Would you mind changing your signature so that the link to your userpage terminates after the font tag closes? This would change your sig to:
[[User:Excirial|<font color="191970">'''Excirial'''</font>]]<sup> ([[User talk:Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contact me</font>]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|<font color="FF8C00">Contribs</font>]])</sup>
Thank you very much! APerson talk! 21:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
You should revoke talk page access it seems.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 20:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
History Colorado may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
( t) Josve05a ( c) 19:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for reverting all those edits at The WikiProject, and blocking the user. Thanks, Mat ty. 007 21:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC) |
I'm sorry that you believed I was trying to vandalize any pages. My account was compromised by a group of hackers, and as such, they took advantage of the opportunity to abuse the access to mess with Wiki pages. My sincerest apologies. TannerNorad ( talk) 01:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Excirial! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
You protected Kiss in 2011. It is now 2014. Please could you unprotect it now. 182.250.240.90 ( talk) 03:54, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
I have begun sending barnstars to participants at the WikiProject Articles for creation/December 2013 - January 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. I plan on sending out the rest shortly, and will post updates here as they occur.
All Done. The awarding process is now completed.
NorthAmerica
1000
11:28, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
I noticed when you histmerged User:Thebigshadiw/sandbox into Adam Jones (lacrosse), you grabbed a few extra revisions. Can you delete Adam Jones (lacrosse), undelete the earliest 2 revisions, move them back to User:Thebigshadiw/sandbox, then undelete the rest of the revisions? (The reason I'm concerned about this is that automated counts currently give me credit for starting the article instead of its actual author). Thanks, Jackmcbarn ( talk) 19:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Greetings! I see that you blocked Hardrock4ever ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) earlier today. I declined an unblock request for him. Looking a little later, I saw edits by Kj198 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). While I'm assuming good faith, I can't help but think, given the interest in the same topics, the two might have some connection. Since you're the blocking admin on the first account, I wanted to bring this to your attention. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Excirial, I have reported the issue, and requested that you and TJRC be blocked from the page. Thank you.
You might want to see the above. -- S.G.(GH) ping! 20:56, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Excirial,
Im actually making a page on of a golfer name fabrice etiennette and with some other collegue we are facing problem due to all link and material to construct the article and we need time to re group all of this! our article is actually on a deletion spot can you be good with us and make our article safe for some time then we can still work and make it as proper as it should for the wikipedia world and also for this golfer world as he has faced problem in this early life of pro golfer.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdemall ( talk • contribs) 18:53, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
The sub page to record reviews doesnt appear to be working for me Makro ( talk) 18:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
The page I edited was deleted as it was not seen as constructive? I was merely adding the correct facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.152.224.199 ( talk) 20:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
that was fast! sorry about the "complete utter stupid bullshit" or whatever it was that i wrote. otherwise i really think the edit should be kept ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.119.141.3 ( talk) 21:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
related comment
Thanks for the help with the link! We are currently working on fixing all of the banners we just placed. Loving the Wikipedia love :-)
DrX (
talk)
21:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi I have been editing the TIGA page - I work for TIGA, but can also assure you all the edits were entirely accurate, is is possible to revert? I am happy to collaborate on creating a more neutral tone, if genuinely needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DAField ( talk • contribs) 21:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi @ Excirial:, AFC Buddy is giving me undeserved extra credit. I reviewed Jay A. Levy, M.D., but forgot to check for copyvio. Realizing my mistake, I undid my review and then failed for the copyvio. Problem is AFCBuddy is counting it as two reviews, not one as it should. I'm not sure the best way to fix this, but thought I should bring it to your attention. Thanks! 78.26 ( I'm no IP, talk to me!) 20:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
My page is promotional.However, every time I try and make a page that isn't promotional you delete me while I'm making the page. I'm trying to create a page about my company as a lot of my interns coming from england find it hard to understand the russian website. The page is factual not promotional. Promotional implies bias which it isn't. If you feel I written biased info tell where it is and I'll delete it. I keep having my page deleted by different "monitors" and so I'm to explain myself ever time. Could please help/ Advise me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yours Ambassadors Work and Studies Abroad Unsigned comment signed for User:Independent information 07:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Does AFCBuddy add reviews I have done before signing up, or do I need to add those manually? Thanks,
Samwalton9 (
talk) 14:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC) Nevermind I answered my own question!
Samwalton9 (
talk)
18:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Saw you busy reverting the vandals (and beating me to the reverts
![]() |
![]() |
The hot and dry patience award |
For your calm patience with the nonsense at Sahara. Not many admins would be patient enough to warn and warn again up to however many before blocking. Please have a cold (fairly) strong dry drink on me (pictured left), to help you deal with the nonsense going on at that hot dry location (and anywhere else). -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 21:26, 6 March 2014 (UTC) |
Hi Excirial, curious as to why my additions were reversed and deemed inappropriate. I simply added another online pawn shop to the list that existed before the others as well as provided additional information with regard to interest rates being charged by these pawn shops. The statement of 4% to 8% per month interest is not entirely true. I've been following this industry for some time now and whats been posted with regard to internet pawns is lopsided and needs to be corrected. If you'd like me to spend more time on it I'd be glad to. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zerobreach ( talk • contribs) 22:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation Excirial, makes complete sense.
Hi Excirial I am Lotfinia there is a problem you need to be aware of I believe. I have received another post from you explaining your changes to my edits but I didn’t make those edits in the first place. The first time you notified me was 2/21/13 regarding Meridian Mississippi and now about CoverGirl- 3/5/14. I dismissed the first one because I knew it was an error. I can assure you of the very few edits done by me none were on either topic since I limit my occasional edits to either the Ancient World and royalty edit. I understand goof ups and cross wires I just want you know we have been a victims of such events. I appreciate all the work and effort you and the other really active folks do for Wikipedia and myself, thank you. Respectfully Lotfinia Lotfinia ( talk) 14:53, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
If you connect to the internet your Internet Service Provider (ISP) will provide you with a so-called IP Address, an unique number that can identify your connection over the internet. This IP is both used to determine where you are, and who you are. Using the IP adress a website like Wikipedia can determine who asked it to do something - be it retrieving an article, be it editing a page or otherwise. If you are not logged into an account Wikipedia will only recognize you as an IP address. Once you are logged into an account it will recognize you as that user instead (Wikipedia will still know the IP address, but it knows it should address you as a specific user instead).
This is where the diagram to the right comes into play. Imagine we have two editors - one who is doing good work, and one who is just trying to vandalize pages. In this example both editors are not logged into an account and as of such their edits are only recognized as being made by their unique IP address. Like any other editors, IP addresses have talk pages that are used for communication towards them. If such an IP editor vandalizes, they will receive a warning that will be placed on their talk page.
This is where some technical stuff comes into play. While an IP Address is unique it only identifies a connection, and not a user. Most ISP's actually have what is called an Address pool, a large set of unique addresses that they can give to their users once they connect to the internet. In most cases an ISP will not give a subscriber the same address every time they connect to the internet. Instead it will look at its pool of addresses and determine which ones not in use yet, and give the subscriber one of these. Just compare it to a hotel: If you rent a room you will receive a random one, and the hotel will not keep your room reserved between your various stays.
Since IP addresses shift between various people it might occur that you may receive an IP address that was previously used by a vandal. If this occurs the talk page of that editor will still contain warning for previous acts of vandalism. So all of a sudden you might end up seeing a boatload of warnings for editors you never made in the first place. To emphasize this - the warnings you saw were targeted at this IP's talk page as opposed to your user accounts talk page. If you look at the contributions made by the IP address you will probably see several more editors that you never made.
There is actually quite a bit more technical stuff involved and the above explanation is a simplified version. Still i hope it explains what happened here, why the warning were there and why you see them even though you were not their target. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 20:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
yo, just dropping in with a q for you...
Just wondering why you changed my comment saying that Valentina Tereshkova is not the biggest Russian babe? like do you know what she did for her country? like WTF man?! im just saying that her hair is amazing and would you look at all those medals, like jeez someones accomplished... so like im just saying cmon man that chicks hot and i feel as if you shouldnt change it cuz shes hot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F8F0:C10:FFF:200:5EFE:CE57:AA1F ( talk) 21:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
You or someone else said scratching her "ass", I didn't think that was appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.22.118.166 ( talk) 20:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, You undid my edit of this page. I changed the cinematographer's first name from Low to Lol. Check out the IMDB page for this movie: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2304771/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ov_st_sm. It does seem to be Lol, not Low, that's why I changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Worldnihao ( talk • contribs) 21:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
A certain similarity between [2] and my username? Doubt that the editor is actually a fan. Dougweller ( talk) 18:51, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
There is a bug while I'm using Huggle 3, when I report a user to WP:AIV with the selected diffs the older ones are instead selected. Are you experiencing this too? Eye snore ( pc) 21:56, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello User:Excirial, Thank you for your help. I have noticed that in the particular page, multiple IPs have been doing the same vandalism again and again, and when prevented they leave impolite messages on the page. Do you think it'd be a good idea to add some protection to the page? Coderzombie ( talk) 03:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
User:109.156.190.13 is abusing their talk page after being blocked, so could you revoke their talk page access? Thanks. Lugia2453 ( talk) 19:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Vandals are still getting too many chances, thanks to HG3's misreading of previous warnings. Just happened twice at User talk:71.42.80.130,for instance. Could you prompt Petrb to look into this? — SMALL JIM 20:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
In this page, when a user warning has been placed anyone else than you, the numbers in each user won't get updated, which can result in misplaced user warnings. In Huggle 2.1.22 everything looks okay and stable. Eye snore ( pc) 00:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Hey there Excirial, Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive/Technical 13 has been edited twice by the script since this chunk of reviews and isn't showing them in the log. I'll note that Template:AFC statistics wasn't updating during that time (which caused me to quit reviewing because I couldn't get a fresh list) due to server issues for Earwigbot. Not sure how those issues affected your script, if at all. — {{U| Technical 13}} ( t • e • c) 23:48, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Excirial, some examples of accepted drafts are:
which afcbuddy isn't picking up on yet. :) — {{U| Technical 13}} ( t • e • c) 22:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Publishing accepted [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] submission
" -- this is more general and correctly handles cases in which reviewers are accepting templates and the like. This should hopefully be the last change! :)
Theopolisme (
talk)
00:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Hi there, I would like you to consider removing the page /info/en/?search=Tony_Anthony_(evangelist) As new substantial evidence has come to light via these websites www.forthesakeofthegospel.co.uk and www.framingthetiger.com This new evidence proves the allegations made against him in the wiki page are unfounded, misleading and libellous. I believe there may be forthcoming legal lawsuits against those involved in making this page public. Please review the above websites and I am sure you will conclude that the page needs to be deleted.
John (favourofGod) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FavourofGod ( talk • contribs) 23:12, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello sir, on the 19th of March, 2014 I edited and contributed to the "Alphie" page on Wikipedia.
Despite these changes being correct, and beneficial, you deleted them. I ask of you to reinstate that article on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF9B:9AB0:2083:46AC:F45A:EBEE ( talk) 21:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Recently you reverted my edit on the Sergio Aragones page, in the Appearances in popular culture section. I changed "hosting the only "Actual Comic Book Booth" at Comic Con 2010" to "hosting the "Last Actual Comic Book Booth" at Comic Con 3010." While a minor edit, I do believe Wikipedia should be as accurate as possible. Please view these two pictures for evidence to support my change. The first change (only to "Last"): Picture 1. The second change (2010 to 3010): Picture 2. Both of these picture can be found at this Web page. Thank you. JDCAce ( talk) 05:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Excirial, Please could you help me out here? Thank you! — JOHNMOORofMOORLAND ( talk) 10:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
You left a comment on my talk page about an edit I recently made on the 1776 (company) page about explaining my deletion. I am currently in the process of writing the explanation (I've been having this particular section repeatedly inserted against consensus) and want to make it a thorough explanation. Thanks for reviewing KAIdc ( talk) 19:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Excirial. Do you think that we should perhaps protect this page for a while? It is constantly hit with vandalism. Hoops gza ( talk) 00:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey Excirial, just wanted you to know wi11337 is a friend of mine and he asked me to make an edit on his page, anything, and that there's no need to revert it. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.185.0 ( talk) 19:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I am an intern for the Association for a more Just Society, and updated the Wikipedia page per my supervisor's request. For all of the information, I merely copied and pasted from our website. If I did not cite the website as a source appropriately, could you help me with this? Otherwise, I don't understand the problem. All of the information was with regards to the mission of the organization or the specific activities that they engage in. Your reply to my update stated that the page did not take a neutral stance. Were the Christian references too explicit? Would it still work to talk about the Christian mission of the organization? Thanks for your help,
Sincerely,
Ian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Idkennedy74 ( talk • contribs) 19:43, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
In some ways I love the new multiple changes feature in the watch list and in other ways I dislike. There was a recent series of three edits to For Today (band). Two "different" anons: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=For_Today_%28band%29&diff=603039122&oldid=602383522 and https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=For_Today_%28band%29&diff=603039494&oldid=603039122. You reverted the second: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=For_Today_(band)&diff=603039514&oldid=603039494 but left the first, which is all that showed when I looked at the diff. I reverted rather than selecting undo. That reverts only the edits of the most recent editor: you. It also left the article with both unconstructive edits in-place. I have fixed it all and wish I could revert my revert of your material because it was clearly correct. Sorry for any confusion this caused. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 00:57, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Would you mind letting me know why you stopped my User - Save Manston Airport?
IT is a cause very dear to my heart and we put a lot of effort into it.
Best regards, Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.205.150 ( talk) 16:12, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello! You left a note on my page to say you undid my edits to the Fallas page. Little unclear why because I just added a paragraph stating that the main falla is burned separately from all the others, and where it is located and a few other bits of info. The article says it needed improvement so I thought I had improved it by adding some extra detail. I love the fallas and the page as it stands does not do them justice. I thought adding a little further information would be beneficial. I live in Spain so the info is authentic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boojoo1 ( talk • contribs) 19:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
You reverted my changes to this article and explained that they "did not appear constructive". I am entirely baffled as to why you would make this statement or change my edits; the additions I made not only added detail to the article, but removed incorrect information and improved the grammar. In addition, your revert was done within moments of my edits being saved, leading me to wonder how carefully they were reviewed. Though you seem to be genuinely attempting to improve Wikipedia, this is the kind of capricious behavior that leads people to avoid contributing. The article is better with my edits, and I prevail upon you to revert them and stop this nonsense. 206.174.34.147 ( talk) 20:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello.
I'm not somebody who edits wikipedia. It was brought to my attention that the wikipedia entry of my publication had been defaced. After looking at the content created, I'm quite sure I know who it is.
When I went to discuss this, I was given a "last warning" to stop defacing pages. This ip address is shared by an entire office essentially. I would like the wikipedia community, whom both I and my publication respect the work of, that no edit or statement coming from this ip address is sanctioned by the people who pay the bills for it. Constructive edits may have also happened, I wouldnt know.
We are investigating and somebody will be no longer touching computers in this building.
We appologize for the trouble caused and the clean up work.
Gerry Bello. Online Managing Editor Columbus Free Press — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.219.92.202 ( talk) 04:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Dear Sir or Madam, I think, with all respect, your removal of the hermione2015.com external link is not fair. I say this only as there is an external link to the French group in wikipedia. It is hermione.com.
So I feel this is a double standard.
I look forward to your reply.
Pls appreciate I do not pretend to be a wiki expert, I simply wanted to update this entry with the fact the frigate is returning to the US in 2015 and there's a group and website that supports this effort, and it is NOT commercial (or a commercial). It is a non-profit 501 c 3 registered, etc.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lafayette1780 ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
I am sending you this message because you listed yourself on meta:Huggle/Members as a beta tester. We desperately need attention of testers, because since we resolved all release blockers, we are ready to release first official version of huggle 3! Before that happens, it would be nice if you could test it so that we can make sure there are no issues with it. You can download it packaged for your operating system (see Wikipedia:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta) or you can of course build it yourself, see https://github.com/huggle/huggle3-qt-lx for that. Don't forget to use always latest version, there is no auto-update message for beta versions!
Should you find any issue, please report it to wikimedia bugzilla, that is a central place for huggle bugs, where we look at them. That is i mportant, if you find a bug and won't report it, we can't fix it. Thank you for your work on this, if you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page, I won't be looking for responses here. Thanks, Petrb ( talk) 15:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for warning this user. I was just in position to report it at WP:AIV because oh his/her rapid vandalism in Tango. A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 18:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is the correct method of going about this but I would like help with arbitration over an edit war on the Threads page and talk page on the subject of the condition of a character's baby, the script for which is below:
Whereas the baby is visibly deformed on-screen, explicit reference is neither made to stillbirth or deformity; both however are implied: the baby is "silent", which suggests that the infant is dead, and Jane looks away with "horror and disgust" which suggests that there is something to be disgusted about, it will be more clear for having watched the final 5-10 minutes of the film which can be found on YouTube. It should also be noted that it is set after a nuclear war. I have made my case on the talk page (mine at the bottom, a second was made last year by another user). Hayek79 ( talk) 12:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Edit: Sources that support my case can be found on the page itself (unless they have since been removed by User:Nick Cooper). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayek79 ( talk • contribs) 12:33, 19 April 2014 (UTC)