![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Anyone care to help me? Yimiju ( talk) 20:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, as you know the history on this article , we have some problems which we can`t solve. To avoid another edit war i give up, and left the other users to do as they want, but i challenged the neutrality of the article. Now, even with that some of them have a problem. Can you please help me, and explain why is that removed since it is clear (from the talk page) that this article is not neutral at least. If i am doing something wrong, can you please explain me please what could be the problem. Thank you. iadrian ( talk) 21:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Excirial, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of FC Leopardos, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 22:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Please try not to turn the Massacres article back into the extreme Greek nationalist apologetic that it was —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.232.4.204 ( talk) 22:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
You accidentally reverted the original revertor, not the vandal. No worries, it's already been taken care of. - 30 ( talk) 23:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
I noticed recently that you have more than once reverted edits where the author of an article has blanked that article, and you have placed a warning on that user's talk page, using Huggle. Certainly generally it is not accepted for the author of a page to remove a speedy deletion tag, but it is generally accepted that if the author of an article blanks the article, and no other user has added any significant content, then the blanking is taken as indicating that the author wants the page deleted, and it can then be tagged for speedy deletion with {{ db-blanked}}. This commonly accepted view is mentioned at WP:CSD. Very often new users who don't know how Wikipedia works see an article they have created tagged for deletion, accept that the article should be deleted, and remove the content, thinking that is deleting it. It is much better in such a case not to bite the newcomer by giving them a warning that they have done something wrong by trying to comply with the deletion notice. You may know all this already: I know from my own experience of using Huggle that it is very easy to slip into simply clicking on the revert button and moving on without checking the edit history carefully enough, but I thought it would not harm to mention this. JamesBWatson ( talk) 20:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
05:15, 8 September 2007 Satori Son (talk | contribs) deleted "Cornell South" (Expired PROD, concern was: "Article is incoherent and is likely a hoax.")
What about the article was incoherent, and who gave you the authority to judge it's authenticity? How is it "likely a hoax? How did you determine this conclusion?
Google it. That's ok, I did it for you:
Cornell South | Facebook Cornell South is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Cornell South and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the ... http://www.facebook.com/people/Cornell-South/100000399171987 - Cached —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.167.7.17 ( talk) 05:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
User J. Patrick Fischer ( talk) is removing systematically the symbols of the city alleging they are not used anymore. The problem is that he doesn´t quote any relevant source to remove the symbols and prove they are not used anymore, despite there´s a law supporting them. I gave the data, he is disputing it, just for personal taste. You are being partial. His editions are the ones to be avoided. Emerson Domaleixo ( talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.41.242.19 ( talk) 14:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Excirial. I requested for several times for help, but nothing happend. I asked for a third oppinion, I announced the edit war and I announced the vandalism of User:Domeleixo. The discussion at the talk page is about the CoA and flag of Dili, but Domaleixo is deleting the sourced chapter about the Administration, too, although I warned him. Anyhow, Domaleixo is insulting the other users in the discussion. There are three against his sole oppinion. There is high time for an administrator to stop him. -- J. Patrick Fischer ( talk) 14:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs) 16:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC) I appreciate the help keeping my talk tidy. Also, it's good seeing you active at recent changes...you save me a lot of work :) Tide rolls 16:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
No, Excirial, that wasn't vandalism. That was a mistake on my part, and I was trying to restore it, but the edit conflicts... My bad. Sorry for interrupting your work. ALI nom nom 14:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Can you lock the topic, been vandalized almost 10 times today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samli150891 ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Islamuslim,
First of, sorry for the somewhat to fast warning regarding this edit - i have removed the warning and reinstated the article. However, you state that there is "No citation", while the text contains 4 references which your edit also removes. Mind giving me a quick explanation on that issue? :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 15:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Who are you? Why did you messige me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.94.201.87 ( talk) 19:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I do take that was just a little error on my discussion page? 81.141.102.111 ( talk) 20:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert while I was busy blocking all of those accounts. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 21:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Related message, Related edit 1, related edit 2
I am sorry for exceeding the three revert rule. Per the talk page, we had already engaged in a discussion with the majority of editors believing that Galraedia's edits were unwarrented. Furthermore, Galraedia has resorted to name calling on the article talk page. Could you add a semi-protection tag on the page? Boromir123 ( talk) 21:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
User:Dlohcierekim has given you a
Macrophage! Macrophages in the body protect against infection and gobble up debris. Macrophages on Wikipedia protect against vandals and gobble up vandalism. This Macrophage is given in recognition of your work in reversion of vandalism and warning of vandals. Thank you for your efforts to keep Wikipedia healthy. Happy editing! --
Dloh
cierekim 22:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Sox, a quick note on the 3RR template.
Yes, technically it was incorrect, as you stayed within the 3RR rule quite admirably. However, in these cases it often seems to help if you give a quick warning to all parties involved as this forces the users to their talk page. Adding a template quickly also reduces the likelihood of users reverting another time, and thereby sparking the issue yet again. I hope you don't mind i sacrificed a bit of accuracy for speeds and preventions sake :). Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 22:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
see this edit war, for which i added UW-3RR to some talk pages.
The User has done nothing but insult, swear, and has been downright unworkable. Compare these two edits: [2] and [3] and the edits on the talk page. It's the same user and he's got 6 reverts today. Should I go straight to AN/I or just 3RR? Soxwon ( talk) 01:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Please read the page history, please go and see why Haskinak got banned before, please go and observe that the edit you just re-reverted was in fact one by Haskinak that removed a ton of referenced material and added all sorts of unreferenced and highly dubious claims. Alan Cox ( talk) 14:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I have accordingly put back the referenced material and removed the defamatory content. If you think this is wrong please stick a third opinion needed on the page, as it needs an independant moderator to sort out really Alan Cox ( talk) 14:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I appreciate your efforts reverting, but, in that case, it wasn't quite appropriate. The story was,
So,
Hope that is all OK. I do appreciate what you tried to do, no problem; just wanted to explain. Cheers, Chzz ► 14:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
related edit 1, related edit 2 (removed), related edit 3, related edit 4
I have pointed out very clearly that the information I added is NOT opinion, it is easily verifiable FACT. Yet a pair of idiots keep reverting without cause, while claiming I am vandalizing. THEY are the ones vandalizing the article.
Check the talk page for Snopes, you'll see it's fact, not fiction.
99.139.224.87 ( talk) 14:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Who are the "pair of idiots" that you say are vandalizing? Immunize ( talk) 14:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Do you even look at the article and what you're doing before you revert an edit? Is it a robot that does it? Please look at the article Michel's Baguette and reconsider the revert you made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.71.95 ( talk) 16:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi moon,
I noticed you were editing, so i hope you don't mind if i ask your assistance with a BLP article and someone claiming to be the subject of the article? It seems we have an IP user claiming to be Jeffrey Caissie, and he requests that his page should be removed due to inaccuracies. Im not sure if it is true or not, but he complains about the death date, and about the name of his daughter (Incidentally the daughter would be his cat, and since he is talking he obviously never died). An IP added this information along with the mainpage of a newspaper, though i cannot seem to find the particular article, even though it should just be a year old. Seeing it is not being handled in the most "optimal" way so far, might i ask if you have some time for this? If you do, this is the talkpage with the discussion. Kind regards, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 19:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing the issue with the article. The problem I saw was that the subject was requesting the deletion of the entire article on invalid grounds. Huggle gave me no way to see that the article was claiming that this person was dead, given where he wrote his comments. I have removed all user warnings from his talk page, and the dubious information as well.
As an aside, the article has a notability tag, but I think this person passes our notability guidelines, albeit barely. As for the offender, it is way too late to issue user warnings, especially given that the edits were anonymous. But I think we should keep the article under watch, just in case. -- Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 19:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey there, what's with the edits and the warning then the edit? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Br%C3%BCno_%28character%29&action=historysubmit&diff=351617591&oldid=351617528 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3AQwerta369&action=historysubmit&diff=351617579&oldid=351617541
All I did was reinsert valid text which was lost in previous edits. Qwerta369 ( talk) 19:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, sorry to bother you , again :), but since you were provide a clear explanation about the previous matter, i would like to ask you another question. EX: We have a location, city Novi Sad, now that city have other language names that are present on that city page. Now we have that Novi Sad is the capital of Vojvodina, and on the article about Vojvodina, we don`t mention other language name of Novi Sad, only the state language which in this example is Serbian language. Is that correct? Thank you again. iadrian ( talk) 20:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
here please. Soxwon ( talk) 20:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I disagree with your statement about the A.C. Moore page. But I will accept it anyway due to it's accurate nature. I was wondering, how do administrators find pages to scrutinize and pick out details, so quickly after changes have been made? If you could respond rapidly that would be enjoyed thoroughly. -- Garlikguy ( talk) 22:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I noticed you accused me of being a "disruption-only account" at WP:ANI. Aside from being a failure to assume good faith, you are simply wrong. In fact, I created the following articles in the last few weeks from scratch alone.
What have you contributed to Wikipedia recently? Factsontheground ( talk) 13:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
I edited the article Martinsburg High School and you reverted my actually constructive edit. Do you not believe in the word of our Lord and Saviour ? 168.216.153.239 ( talk) 12:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
I hate "final warning". What if no one sees a string of vandalism after the "final warning"? Then they feel like they got away with something, and just keep going. <rant /> <grin /> Thanks. I've been dying to say that for years. Dloh cierekim 14:07, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Though no this time. Special:Contributions/87.83.6.253. Thanks for your work here. Dloh cierekim 14:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Tiresome work ! Codf1977 ( talk) 15:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to say great work on the RCP today :), and would you like me to protect your user page from those vandals? - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 19:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
This IP is one of a school, so warning of a ban due to vandalism or non-constructive edits will not be noticed by the majority of students. I recommend that this IP is blocked from editing due to any cautioning or discipline will not reach students and the unlikelihood that students will cease their vandalism. 209.68.66.150 ( talk) 17:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I do not understand the point of your reverting my edit to Bullet. The section I corrected was poorly written, grammatically incorrect, and extremely unprofessional. I corrected it to have proper sentence structure and better writing without changing the meaning of it. This is not "unconstructive". 75.66.80.108 ( talk) 19:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing my edits at Derby High School. I was giving a first person point of veiw on the school. You need to leave it as they are facts agreed on by the student body. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAnarchist8239 ( talk contribs) 20:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
True enough that his edits weren't really vandalism as opposed to a cry for help - that is why i reverted the first edit without warning and started typing a message to ask if he needed help. However when i saw this edit and a right after that another one i decided that warning the user was the quickest way to get him to his talk page, to prevent him from making more changes that might cause warnings from other patrols. At the very least it gave me a minute to figure out the problem and to see if i could fix it :). Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 20:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Related Conversation (Also archived locally)
I go around wikipeidia, and tell good administrators, like you, how they make wikipedia a great place to find information. You are funny and understanding, but still get rid of vandilisim. I think that you will continue to go on doing what you do, and that you will help as many people as you can. So put that n your cap and wear it like the fether that it is! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlikguy ( talk • contribs) 22:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I completely missed that you added a shiny to my award page yesterday. Thanks! :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 16:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Please could you take a look at User:Quzeyli continued disruptive behavior [ [4]] Mcnabs ( talk) 15:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
I dropped a small short rangeblock on that IP range. Hopefully that will get them the message. TN X Man 13:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
|
The Userpage Shield | |
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my userpage Immunize ( talk) 18:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC) |
or the big button on the top left will revert with a default warning summary - the button gives several other options as well. <R> or the big round button allows for reverts without a warning. There are plenty of options to play with. I would advice two things: Go to System => Options => And check "Enable preloading of Diffs" with a value of 5. Huggle will then pre-load up to 5 diffs which means you have no wait time while navigating to the next edit in the queue. The second option is under System => Reporting => Either check "Prompt for Report" or "Issue report automatically". This will either prompt you if a user has been warned past level 4 with the option to report them, or it will report them completely automatically if they reach this level. As said before huggle will automatically select a warning level, but this can also be overridden by using the advanced options.
Thanks for this. Cheers, -- Jezebel'sPonyo shhh 20:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC):
If the desire of wiki is to be unbiased and truthful, seeing how my posts pointing this out keep getting erased. Then the facts of the page that i am editing need to be checked and used in a informative way. I am not being rude just asking you to use the wiki as it is ment. if i post on a page and say it is slander and based on opinion and it is, why would i be threatened to be blocked, not the author of the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.97.237 ( talk) 15:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the AIV reports - just letting you know that ultimately I decided there was little point blocking any of the individual IPs because the vandal in question was clearly switching straight away; and I just semi-protected the page. If you run into these types of vandals it may save you some time on multiple reports if you either (a) report one of them to AIV noting that it's obviously switching IPs, or (b) just request page protection at WP:RFPP. Once he's switched off an IP address blocking it doesn't actually help... Cheers for your vigilance, anyway ~ mazca talk 17:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your intervention on my talk page—I appreciate it.-- Old Moonraker ( talk) 21:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
I have downloaded huggle, but I have no idea how to use it. Please help. Immunize ( talk) 21:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Userpage | Talk | Awards | Dashboard | Programs | Sandbox | Sketchbook | Blocknote |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Anyone care to help me? Yimiju ( talk) 20:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, as you know the history on this article , we have some problems which we can`t solve. To avoid another edit war i give up, and left the other users to do as they want, but i challenged the neutrality of the article. Now, even with that some of them have a problem. Can you please help me, and explain why is that removed since it is clear (from the talk page) that this article is not neutral at least. If i am doing something wrong, can you please explain me please what could be the problem. Thank you. iadrian ( talk) 21:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Excirial, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of FC Leopardos, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 22:34, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Please try not to turn the Massacres article back into the extreme Greek nationalist apologetic that it was —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.232.4.204 ( talk) 22:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
You accidentally reverted the original revertor, not the vandal. No worries, it's already been taken care of. - 30 ( talk) 23:00, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
I noticed recently that you have more than once reverted edits where the author of an article has blanked that article, and you have placed a warning on that user's talk page, using Huggle. Certainly generally it is not accepted for the author of a page to remove a speedy deletion tag, but it is generally accepted that if the author of an article blanks the article, and no other user has added any significant content, then the blanking is taken as indicating that the author wants the page deleted, and it can then be tagged for speedy deletion with {{ db-blanked}}. This commonly accepted view is mentioned at WP:CSD. Very often new users who don't know how Wikipedia works see an article they have created tagged for deletion, accept that the article should be deleted, and remove the content, thinking that is deleting it. It is much better in such a case not to bite the newcomer by giving them a warning that they have done something wrong by trying to comply with the deletion notice. You may know all this already: I know from my own experience of using Huggle that it is very easy to slip into simply clicking on the revert button and moving on without checking the edit history carefully enough, but I thought it would not harm to mention this. JamesBWatson ( talk) 20:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
05:15, 8 September 2007 Satori Son (talk | contribs) deleted "Cornell South" (Expired PROD, concern was: "Article is incoherent and is likely a hoax.")
What about the article was incoherent, and who gave you the authority to judge it's authenticity? How is it "likely a hoax? How did you determine this conclusion?
Google it. That's ok, I did it for you:
Cornell South | Facebook Cornell South is on Facebook. Join Facebook to connect with Cornell South and others you may know. Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the ... http://www.facebook.com/people/Cornell-South/100000399171987 - Cached —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.167.7.17 ( talk) 05:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
User J. Patrick Fischer ( talk) is removing systematically the symbols of the city alleging they are not used anymore. The problem is that he doesn´t quote any relevant source to remove the symbols and prove they are not used anymore, despite there´s a law supporting them. I gave the data, he is disputing it, just for personal taste. You are being partial. His editions are the ones to be avoided. Emerson Domaleixo ( talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.41.242.19 ( talk) 14:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Excirial. I requested for several times for help, but nothing happend. I asked for a third oppinion, I announced the edit war and I announced the vandalism of User:Domeleixo. The discussion at the talk page is about the CoA and flag of Dili, but Domaleixo is deleting the sourced chapter about the Administration, too, although I warned him. Anyhow, Domaleixo is insulting the other users in the discussion. There are three against his sole oppinion. There is high time for an administrator to stop him. -- J. Patrick Fischer ( talk) 14:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs) 16:25, 22 March 2010 (UTC) I appreciate the help keeping my talk tidy. Also, it's good seeing you active at recent changes...you save me a lot of work :) Tide rolls 16:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
No, Excirial, that wasn't vandalism. That was a mistake on my part, and I was trying to restore it, but the edit conflicts... My bad. Sorry for interrupting your work. ALI nom nom 14:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Can you lock the topic, been vandalized almost 10 times today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samli150891 ( talk • contribs) 14:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Islamuslim,
First of, sorry for the somewhat to fast warning regarding this edit - i have removed the warning and reinstated the article. However, you state that there is "No citation", while the text contains 4 references which your edit also removes. Mind giving me a quick explanation on that issue? :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 15:38, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Who are you? Why did you messige me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.94.201.87 ( talk) 19:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I do take that was just a little error on my discussion page? 81.141.102.111 ( talk) 20:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert while I was busy blocking all of those accounts. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 21:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Related message, Related edit 1, related edit 2
I am sorry for exceeding the three revert rule. Per the talk page, we had already engaged in a discussion with the majority of editors believing that Galraedia's edits were unwarrented. Furthermore, Galraedia has resorted to name calling on the article talk page. Could you add a semi-protection tag on the page? Boromir123 ( talk) 21:59, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
User:Dlohcierekim has given you a
Macrophage! Macrophages in the body protect against infection and gobble up debris. Macrophages on Wikipedia protect against vandals and gobble up vandalism. This Macrophage is given in recognition of your work in reversion of vandalism and warning of vandals. Thank you for your efforts to keep Wikipedia healthy. Happy editing! --
Dloh
cierekim 22:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Sox, a quick note on the 3RR template.
Yes, technically it was incorrect, as you stayed within the 3RR rule quite admirably. However, in these cases it often seems to help if you give a quick warning to all parties involved as this forces the users to their talk page. Adding a template quickly also reduces the likelihood of users reverting another time, and thereby sparking the issue yet again. I hope you don't mind i sacrificed a bit of accuracy for speeds and preventions sake :). Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 22:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
see this edit war, for which i added UW-3RR to some talk pages.
The User has done nothing but insult, swear, and has been downright unworkable. Compare these two edits: [2] and [3] and the edits on the talk page. It's the same user and he's got 6 reverts today. Should I go straight to AN/I or just 3RR? Soxwon ( talk) 01:02, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Please read the page history, please go and see why Haskinak got banned before, please go and observe that the edit you just re-reverted was in fact one by Haskinak that removed a ton of referenced material and added all sorts of unreferenced and highly dubious claims. Alan Cox ( talk) 14:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I have accordingly put back the referenced material and removed the defamatory content. If you think this is wrong please stick a third opinion needed on the page, as it needs an independant moderator to sort out really Alan Cox ( talk) 14:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I appreciate your efforts reverting, but, in that case, it wasn't quite appropriate. The story was,
So,
Hope that is all OK. I do appreciate what you tried to do, no problem; just wanted to explain. Cheers, Chzz ► 14:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
related edit 1, related edit 2 (removed), related edit 3, related edit 4
I have pointed out very clearly that the information I added is NOT opinion, it is easily verifiable FACT. Yet a pair of idiots keep reverting without cause, while claiming I am vandalizing. THEY are the ones vandalizing the article.
Check the talk page for Snopes, you'll see it's fact, not fiction.
99.139.224.87 ( talk) 14:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Who are the "pair of idiots" that you say are vandalizing? Immunize ( talk) 14:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Do you even look at the article and what you're doing before you revert an edit? Is it a robot that does it? Please look at the article Michel's Baguette and reconsider the revert you made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.71.95 ( talk) 16:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi moon,
I noticed you were editing, so i hope you don't mind if i ask your assistance with a BLP article and someone claiming to be the subject of the article? It seems we have an IP user claiming to be Jeffrey Caissie, and he requests that his page should be removed due to inaccuracies. Im not sure if it is true or not, but he complains about the death date, and about the name of his daughter (Incidentally the daughter would be his cat, and since he is talking he obviously never died). An IP added this information along with the mainpage of a newspaper, though i cannot seem to find the particular article, even though it should just be a year old. Seeing it is not being handled in the most "optimal" way so far, might i ask if you have some time for this? If you do, this is the talkpage with the discussion. Kind regards, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 19:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for pointing the issue with the article. The problem I saw was that the subject was requesting the deletion of the entire article on invalid grounds. Huggle gave me no way to see that the article was claiming that this person was dead, given where he wrote his comments. I have removed all user warnings from his talk page, and the dubious information as well.
As an aside, the article has a notability tag, but I think this person passes our notability guidelines, albeit barely. As for the offender, it is way too late to issue user warnings, especially given that the edits were anonymous. But I think we should keep the article under watch, just in case. -- Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 19:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hey there, what's with the edits and the warning then the edit? http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Br%C3%BCno_%28character%29&action=historysubmit&diff=351617591&oldid=351617528 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3AQwerta369&action=historysubmit&diff=351617579&oldid=351617541
All I did was reinsert valid text which was lost in previous edits. Qwerta369 ( talk) 19:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello, sorry to bother you , again :), but since you were provide a clear explanation about the previous matter, i would like to ask you another question. EX: We have a location, city Novi Sad, now that city have other language names that are present on that city page. Now we have that Novi Sad is the capital of Vojvodina, and on the article about Vojvodina, we don`t mention other language name of Novi Sad, only the state language which in this example is Serbian language. Is that correct? Thank you again. iadrian ( talk) 20:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
here please. Soxwon ( talk) 20:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I disagree with your statement about the A.C. Moore page. But I will accept it anyway due to it's accurate nature. I was wondering, how do administrators find pages to scrutinize and pick out details, so quickly after changes have been made? If you could respond rapidly that would be enjoyed thoroughly. -- Garlikguy ( talk) 22:07, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
I noticed you accused me of being a "disruption-only account" at WP:ANI. Aside from being a failure to assume good faith, you are simply wrong. In fact, I created the following articles in the last few weeks from scratch alone.
What have you contributed to Wikipedia recently? Factsontheground ( talk) 13:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
I edited the article Martinsburg High School and you reverted my actually constructive edit. Do you not believe in the word of our Lord and Saviour ? 168.216.153.239 ( talk) 12:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
I hate "final warning". What if no one sees a string of vandalism after the "final warning"? Then they feel like they got away with something, and just keep going. <rant /> <grin /> Thanks. I've been dying to say that for years. Dloh cierekim 14:07, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Though no this time. Special:Contributions/87.83.6.253. Thanks for your work here. Dloh cierekim 14:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Tiresome work ! Codf1977 ( talk) 15:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to say great work on the RCP today :), and would you like me to protect your user page from those vandals? - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 19:53, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
This IP is one of a school, so warning of a ban due to vandalism or non-constructive edits will not be noticed by the majority of students. I recommend that this IP is blocked from editing due to any cautioning or discipline will not reach students and the unlikelihood that students will cease their vandalism. 209.68.66.150 ( talk) 17:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I do not understand the point of your reverting my edit to Bullet. The section I corrected was poorly written, grammatically incorrect, and extremely unprofessional. I corrected it to have proper sentence structure and better writing without changing the meaning of it. This is not "unconstructive". 75.66.80.108 ( talk) 19:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing my edits at Derby High School. I was giving a first person point of veiw on the school. You need to leave it as they are facts agreed on by the student body. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAnarchist8239 ( talk contribs) 20:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
True enough that his edits weren't really vandalism as opposed to a cry for help - that is why i reverted the first edit without warning and started typing a message to ask if he needed help. However when i saw this edit and a right after that another one i decided that warning the user was the quickest way to get him to his talk page, to prevent him from making more changes that might cause warnings from other patrols. At the very least it gave me a minute to figure out the problem and to see if i could fix it :). Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 20:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Related Conversation (Also archived locally)
I go around wikipeidia, and tell good administrators, like you, how they make wikipedia a great place to find information. You are funny and understanding, but still get rid of vandilisim. I think that you will continue to go on doing what you do, and that you will help as many people as you can. So put that n your cap and wear it like the fether that it is! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garlikguy ( talk • contribs) 22:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
I completely missed that you added a shiny to my award page yesterday. Thanks! :) Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs) 16:12, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Please could you take a look at User:Quzeyli continued disruptive behavior [ [4]] Mcnabs ( talk) 15:16, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
I dropped a small short rangeblock on that IP range. Hopefully that will get them the message. TN X Man 13:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
|
The Userpage Shield | |
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my userpage Immunize ( talk) 18:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC) |
or the big button on the top left will revert with a default warning summary - the button gives several other options as well. <R> or the big round button allows for reverts without a warning. There are plenty of options to play with. I would advice two things: Go to System => Options => And check "Enable preloading of Diffs" with a value of 5. Huggle will then pre-load up to 5 diffs which means you have no wait time while navigating to the next edit in the queue. The second option is under System => Reporting => Either check "Prompt for Report" or "Issue report automatically". This will either prompt you if a user has been warned past level 4 with the option to report them, or it will report them completely automatically if they reach this level. As said before huggle will automatically select a warning level, but this can also be overridden by using the advanced options.
Thanks for this. Cheers, -- Jezebel'sPonyo shhh 20:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC):
If the desire of wiki is to be unbiased and truthful, seeing how my posts pointing this out keep getting erased. Then the facts of the page that i am editing need to be checked and used in a informative way. I am not being rude just asking you to use the wiki as it is ment. if i post on a page and say it is slander and based on opinion and it is, why would i be threatened to be blocked, not the author of the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.97.237 ( talk) 15:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the AIV reports - just letting you know that ultimately I decided there was little point blocking any of the individual IPs because the vandal in question was clearly switching straight away; and I just semi-protected the page. If you run into these types of vandals it may save you some time on multiple reports if you either (a) report one of them to AIV noting that it's obviously switching IPs, or (b) just request page protection at WP:RFPP. Once he's switched off an IP address blocking it doesn't actually help... Cheers for your vigilance, anyway ~ mazca talk 17:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your intervention on my talk page—I appreciate it.-- Old Moonraker ( talk) 21:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
I have downloaded huggle, but I have no idea how to use it. Please help. Immunize ( talk) 21:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)