![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
From url cited in edit summary: "Aged 44, her struggle against cancer started when she was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2008. In 2013, she disclosed to Mexican state news Agency Notimex that her illness was 'chronic' after her tumour spread to other parts of her body. In 2014, the mutation had reached her liver." Yours, Quis separabit? 02:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:Chairman. Next is AN/I...
RGloucester —
☎
04:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Talk:Chairman.
RGloucester —
☎
04:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the influence on the AS article. I appreciate your input! Theduinoelegy ( talk) 20:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Maybe you should remove all the other texts there that don't contribute to anything? And maybe you should move the text I wrote to wherever it belongs, if you feel like it doesn't belong on the circumcision talk page. Because clearly it belongs somewhere on wikipedia. 84.210.54.80 ( talk) 21:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
You appear to confuse me with someone who is pro-circumcision. Just because I am against circumcision doesn't mean I think the page should be about the religious aspect of the phenomenon. I think it's fine the way it is being about medical info. And I don't think many people will support your suggestion to move it. But that's completely unrelated to my position on circumcision. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 22:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the space in thigh gap. That girl needs a cheeseburger. Jonathunder ( talk) 16:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I want you to know that you aren't wrong, a lot of it is WP:COATRACK but because the issue had gone to WP:ANI I felt that the prior consensus needed to be in place. I hope a discussion can take place, I have no idea what issue Cptnono has with the article but maybe they will say. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 21:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, actually user Dohn joe has also pointed out before but it was ignored, so I just posted the whole quote from the Article Title policy. STSC ( talk) 04:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi EvergreenFir, I've closed and archived this arbitration clarification request that you are listed as a party to to the Editing of Biographies of Living Persons case talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, -- L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) 17:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I believe that we (and the vast majority of Wikipedians) agree that we should have a policy (and an interpretation of that policy) that facilitates improvement of the Encyclopedia; and I thank you for working towards this.
That was an excellent idea about the photos, making the infobox demonstrate the distended and non-distended states (are those better words? I've never heard the word 'tense' used, but then again I don't own a scrotum.)
Hi, I think there's been a mistake. On the Gravity Falls (Season 2) page, I wrote "Absent: Alex Hirsch as Grunkle Stan". Don't you know that when a main cast member of a tv show is not in an episode, they're "absent"? Stan wasn't in "Northwest Mansion Mystery". Isn't that correct? Why did you delete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
What do you mean? All tv show articles do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 01:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Many shows that I watch, particularly disney shows, have the absent tag. You do know that it's actually a thing, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 01:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm really not sure what on earth you mean. WP:TV is an article, not a person. Also, "Absent" has been used on many WIKIPEDIA articles, such as List of Liv and Maddie Episodes, List of Jessie Episodes, and K.C. Undercover. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 01:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Look, I'm sorry if I sound rude. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 01:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hope you feel better. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 02:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm probably sounding dumb, but how do I comment on WP:TV? Also, what's the future of "Absent"? The article on WP:TV seems to be at a dead end. It's not slow, but it is going back and forth. Thanks 4 the kitten, BTW. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, but how do I leave a comment? 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Oh, wait. It's members only, and I doubt I'll be able to get an account soon. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
may I ask you why you deleted my correction about the surname Devi (which is not a surname)? I am positive, and I quoted sources. Please explain me why every contribution by an unregistered user is systematically deleted without discussion in wikipedia. Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.45.249.138 ( talk) 16:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi EvergreenFir,
You wrote the request against me "The 3RR is independent of edit warring. I myself found this out the hard way". I wondered what hard way as your block log seems to be clean.
Thanks, Ashtul ( talk) 16:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, it's me.
I just wanted to apologize for being so bellicose earlier--I understand that it must have been a considerable annoyance. I'm sorry, truly. Vehemence frequently gets the best of me with subjects like these. It's very near and dear to me, I suppose. In any case, my actions were completely unwarranted--and quite idiotically pugnacious. I truly regret the whole affair. You needn't forgive me, but know that I am deeply remorseful about it. Ghost Lourde ( talk) 02:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Lixxx235 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
-- L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) 23:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
your impressionator is back and is trying to make it look like they are an alternate account of you just fyi Saturn star ( talk) 01:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
— DoRD ( talk) 22:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
I just want to give an impression of how I perceive your actions on articles concerning men, without offending you or critiquing you as a person. I am not writing about anything you did to me, just what I see you do.
How would you feel if and experienced wiki editor, who openly declares himself as an andronist (or whatever the opposite of feminist is), would block every change you make on a women related article and then just put a WP:Something after it, saying you violate some policy which is actually not that easy to understand and does have some gray zones?
I am asking you to take the part of “seeking a compromise” in the consensus building process more serious. I am asking you to sometimes not delete or revert, but to say “Hey, you did the following wrong; let me show you how it’s done.”
I do that for two reasons:
1) Wikipedia is a source of information for pupils. In the sexism article there was a note saying that it is used in schools in South Africa for an education project. I would want young boys to know what could affect them, so that they can defend themselves, but more importantly that they don’t believe that they are invincible. Seeing their own vulnerability should help them relate to the fears and threats girls are facing. If you understand that suddenly you could be on the weaker end, the incentive to create a violence and discrimination free environment is much greater.
2) You will never manage to drive people with crazy opinions away by deleting articles or stopping every change. Prohibition did not end drinking, that’s not how it works. If someone would come up with some weird “rape-myth” theory, me and plenty other men would immediately stand up against it. But if you deny that men also face violence and discrimination, you suddenly put me and other balanced men into a corner where we don’t even want to stand and the problem is bigger than before.
I kindly ask you to think about these things and maybe sometimes take a more constructive stance also on issues which you don’t see as a big concern. Lucentcalendar ( talk) 07:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Good catch but not a "good faith edit". Quis separabit? 04:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
We appreciate all the good work! :) -- The editor who likes cosplay
Pikachu
(pika!) #
256
8 @
06:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Please {{
re}}
.
EvergreenFir I had no intentions of vandalism. I was merely editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C0E2:D210:E8ED:1A6A:F639:197E ( talk) 16:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
why'd you remove my Quran quotes about http://quran.com/8/39 ? Divinity76 ( talk) 00:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't see the purpose in changing my edit to the 'genre' section of the Gravity Falls page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.35.216.250 ( talk) 11:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
This time I actually gave a source to my information and you deleted it. What the heck dude! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zackdaman ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Salem, and I was wondering if you could help me with something. A user by the name "Thestarborn1028" is vandalizing the Bad Girls Club pages constantly adding fictional and fake info on some of these pages. He is causing great stress to me, constantly fixing the pages he has been damaging. Could you talk to him or....block him maybe ?
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalemCrow101 ( talk • contribs)
I actually do not know and I apologize Saturn star ( talk) 04:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey there EvergreenFir. Thanks for all your awesome work. I just popped in to point out that both User:Bvwjewelers and user:RCI Ruth had copy vio stuff on their userpages, copied from their company websites. If you could watch out for that while patrolling, it would be a big help. Best, -- Diannaa ( talk) 03:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, EvergreenFir, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr ( talk) 05:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC) |
![]() |
in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape article you say citations aren't required for sources mentioned in the body of the article. 1) It's better if they are. 2) In this case they are not. There is no Justice Department citation. The only figure from the justice department in the body stated 8% not 2% and the line of most sources cite between 1.5 and 8 % had no bearing in reality as more than half of the sources in the body had percentages in double figures. These articles have to be based in reality not what you want to be reality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.129.113.158 ( talk) 06:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
This user is still vandalizing the pages. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bad_Girls_Club_(season_4)&action=edit&undoafter=650836835&undo=650973208 <- I undid his edit.
-SalemCrow — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalemCrow101 ( talk • contribs) 16:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
... you are an enrichment for this community. Lucentcalendar ( talk) 17:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
at a redent edit at
Male privilege, "particularly in jobs which are considered to be of high value to society, such as doctors or architects." ( i just added architects) and am wondering how we can reconcile this statement with this one
the answer (i.e., my [opinion]]) idsthat the issue is not that doctors are seen as being valuable to society but rather that they are very well paid in the US & UK. So . . . . .....? Carptrash ( talk) 22:53, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
You are at UA, right? Do you know a Dr. Kvaran there? She is a cat person too. Carptrash ( talk) 05:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Why restore incivil comments by PtF and then ask not to do it? I'd prefer help in keeping them down i don't believe I made any comments about him or removed any comments he made about content, only his comments about me. -- DHeyward ( talk) 04:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Can you please check WP:SPEEDY and then self-revert? Abecedare ( talk) 07:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Recently I came across what I considered a micro-aggression (not against me, but in article). Do you consider yourself knowledgeable about gender related micro-aggressions? -- DHeyward ( talk) 05:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm generally a protectionist in BLPs be they of any political view or faction, so it brings me great alarm when I see anyone who does nothing else but add negativity to a BLP. I get alarmed and rightfully should when this occurs, so my questioning of motives was more a strong suggestion that other things besides just the negative could surely be improved. Its staggering to see so much effort spend on adding negativity and so little on neutral mundane issues that are needed.-- MONGO 06:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Please turn off your Twinkle bot as it's inadvertently vandalizing pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.92.94 ( talk) 18:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
My edit to List of Steven Universe episodes was not unsourced! It's short summary can be easily viewed here! ( http://the-world-of-steven-universe.tumblr.com/post/114169735046/steven-and-the-cool-kids-make-an-interesting) my edit was not false! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.53.75 ( talk) 02:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's worth hanging around and reverting that comment, but that's just me. ekips39 ( talk) 04:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Evergreen, I noticed you just reverted a ton of BS cat edits from IP 2604:2000:a038:8900:48ef:c8bb:d609:8d91. I was just trying to get my mass rollback tool sorted out (I added it a while back, but it didn't work properly and I think I applied it to the wrong page.), and just when I was gonna test it out, I saw that the IP's edits had been reverted. Are you using a tool for this, or did you do it manually? (Feel free to reply here if you'd like) Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radical feminism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milieu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
While I didn't sign....do not alter my postings especially if they are not unwelcomed by the other user. Thank you.-- MONGO 18:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Pursuant to section 3a of an arbitration motion, you were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. Please note: being listed as a party does not imply any wrongdoing nor mean that there will necessarily be findings of fact or remedies regarding that party. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 14, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, -- L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Evergreen. Your rejection of my contribution to the Gangs in the United Kingdom article ([ here]) wasn't sufficiently explained. Can you elaborate on why you thought it wasn't a constructive addition? I used multiple sources throughout. What was your problem with the content sourced from: http://www.octf.gov.uk/organised-crime-in-northern-ireland/organised-immigration-crime.aspx ? And why did you use this as a reason for rejecting all of the Belfast section? 77.99.12.140 ( talk) 19:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
To answer a question, two cases are being opened. The other case, American Politics 2, is also being opened. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 7, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your reverting of vandalism on " S&M"! — ₳aron 09:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC) |
Can you explain what I could've done different to not have this edit reverted? The issue is definitely a men's rights issue Shazen27 ( talk) 03:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Evergreen, I'M sry if I caused any trouble. I'm a new wikipedia user and I didn't know these rules or what they mean. I don't know why but Artemis Panthar keeps deleting my summary of the Steven Universe Episode Joy Ride. What should I do? HawsBoss
PS but I don't know how to make a new edit tab sry. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
HawsBoss (
talk •
contribs)
Reply: Evergreen. As I said before I am a new user and will look into the guidelines in the future. I just wanted people to know the summaries of steven universe episodes. Please forgive me. Hawsboss — Preceding unsigned comment added by HawsBoss ( talk • contribs) 11:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
From url cited in edit summary: "Aged 44, her struggle against cancer started when she was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2008. In 2013, she disclosed to Mexican state news Agency Notimex that her illness was 'chronic' after her tumour spread to other parts of her body. In 2014, the mutation had reached her liver." Yours, Quis separabit? 02:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Talk:Chairman. Next is AN/I...
RGloucester —
☎
04:05, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Talk:Chairman.
RGloucester —
☎
04:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the influence on the AS article. I appreciate your input! Theduinoelegy ( talk) 20:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Maybe you should remove all the other texts there that don't contribute to anything? And maybe you should move the text I wrote to wherever it belongs, if you feel like it doesn't belong on the circumcision talk page. Because clearly it belongs somewhere on wikipedia. 84.210.54.80 ( talk) 21:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
You appear to confuse me with someone who is pro-circumcision. Just because I am against circumcision doesn't mean I think the page should be about the religious aspect of the phenomenon. I think it's fine the way it is being about medical info. And I don't think many people will support your suggestion to move it. But that's completely unrelated to my position on circumcision. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 22:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the space in thigh gap. That girl needs a cheeseburger. Jonathunder ( talk) 16:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
I want you to know that you aren't wrong, a lot of it is WP:COATRACK but because the issue had gone to WP:ANI I felt that the prior consensus needed to be in place. I hope a discussion can take place, I have no idea what issue Cptnono has with the article but maybe they will say. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 21:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, actually user Dohn joe has also pointed out before but it was ignored, so I just posted the whole quote from the Article Title policy. STSC ( talk) 04:25, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi EvergreenFir, I've closed and archived this arbitration clarification request that you are listed as a party to to the Editing of Biographies of Living Persons case talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, -- L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) 17:58, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I believe that we (and the vast majority of Wikipedians) agree that we should have a policy (and an interpretation of that policy) that facilitates improvement of the Encyclopedia; and I thank you for working towards this.
That was an excellent idea about the photos, making the infobox demonstrate the distended and non-distended states (are those better words? I've never heard the word 'tense' used, but then again I don't own a scrotum.)
Hi, I think there's been a mistake. On the Gravity Falls (Season 2) page, I wrote "Absent: Alex Hirsch as Grunkle Stan". Don't you know that when a main cast member of a tv show is not in an episode, they're "absent"? Stan wasn't in "Northwest Mansion Mystery". Isn't that correct? Why did you delete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
What do you mean? All tv show articles do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 01:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Many shows that I watch, particularly disney shows, have the absent tag. You do know that it's actually a thing, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 01:36, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm really not sure what on earth you mean. WP:TV is an article, not a person. Also, "Absent" has been used on many WIKIPEDIA articles, such as List of Liv and Maddie Episodes, List of Jessie Episodes, and K.C. Undercover. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 01:44, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Look, I'm sorry if I sound rude. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 01:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Hope you feel better. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 02:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm probably sounding dumb, but how do I comment on WP:TV? Also, what's the future of "Absent"? The article on WP:TV seems to be at a dead end. It's not slow, but it is going back and forth. Thanks 4 the kitten, BTW. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes, but how do I leave a comment? 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Oh, wait. It's members only, and I doubt I'll be able to get an account soon. 71.162.155.87 ( talk) 00:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
may I ask you why you deleted my correction about the surname Devi (which is not a surname)? I am positive, and I quoted sources. Please explain me why every contribution by an unregistered user is systematically deleted without discussion in wikipedia. Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.45.249.138 ( talk) 16:05, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi EvergreenFir,
You wrote the request against me "The 3RR is independent of edit warring. I myself found this out the hard way". I wondered what hard way as your block log seems to be clean.
Thanks, Ashtul ( talk) 16:59, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, it's me.
I just wanted to apologize for being so bellicose earlier--I understand that it must have been a considerable annoyance. I'm sorry, truly. Vehemence frequently gets the best of me with subjects like these. It's very near and dear to me, I suppose. In any case, my actions were completely unwarranted--and quite idiotically pugnacious. I truly regret the whole affair. You needn't forgive me, but know that I am deeply remorseful about it. Ghost Lourde ( talk) 02:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Lixxx235 has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
-- L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) 23:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
your impressionator is back and is trying to make it look like they are an alternate account of you just fyi Saturn star ( talk) 01:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
— DoRD ( talk) 22:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
I just want to give an impression of how I perceive your actions on articles concerning men, without offending you or critiquing you as a person. I am not writing about anything you did to me, just what I see you do.
How would you feel if and experienced wiki editor, who openly declares himself as an andronist (or whatever the opposite of feminist is), would block every change you make on a women related article and then just put a WP:Something after it, saying you violate some policy which is actually not that easy to understand and does have some gray zones?
I am asking you to take the part of “seeking a compromise” in the consensus building process more serious. I am asking you to sometimes not delete or revert, but to say “Hey, you did the following wrong; let me show you how it’s done.”
I do that for two reasons:
1) Wikipedia is a source of information for pupils. In the sexism article there was a note saying that it is used in schools in South Africa for an education project. I would want young boys to know what could affect them, so that they can defend themselves, but more importantly that they don’t believe that they are invincible. Seeing their own vulnerability should help them relate to the fears and threats girls are facing. If you understand that suddenly you could be on the weaker end, the incentive to create a violence and discrimination free environment is much greater.
2) You will never manage to drive people with crazy opinions away by deleting articles or stopping every change. Prohibition did not end drinking, that’s not how it works. If someone would come up with some weird “rape-myth” theory, me and plenty other men would immediately stand up against it. But if you deny that men also face violence and discrimination, you suddenly put me and other balanced men into a corner where we don’t even want to stand and the problem is bigger than before.
I kindly ask you to think about these things and maybe sometimes take a more constructive stance also on issues which you don’t see as a big concern. Lucentcalendar ( talk) 07:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Good catch but not a "good faith edit". Quis separabit? 04:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
We appreciate all the good work! :) -- The editor who likes cosplay
Pikachu
(pika!) #
256
8 @
06:07, 5 March 2015 (UTC) Please {{
re}}
.
EvergreenFir I had no intentions of vandalism. I was merely editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C0E2:D210:E8ED:1A6A:F639:197E ( talk) 16:15, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
why'd you remove my Quran quotes about http://quran.com/8/39 ? Divinity76 ( talk) 00:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't see the purpose in changing my edit to the 'genre' section of the Gravity Falls page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.35.216.250 ( talk) 11:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
This time I actually gave a source to my information and you deleted it. What the heck dude! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zackdaman ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Salem, and I was wondering if you could help me with something. A user by the name "Thestarborn1028" is vandalizing the Bad Girls Club pages constantly adding fictional and fake info on some of these pages. He is causing great stress to me, constantly fixing the pages he has been damaging. Could you talk to him or....block him maybe ?
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalemCrow101 ( talk • contribs)
I actually do not know and I apologize Saturn star ( talk) 04:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Hey there EvergreenFir. Thanks for all your awesome work. I just popped in to point out that both User:Bvwjewelers and user:RCI Ruth had copy vio stuff on their userpages, copied from their company websites. If you could watch out for that while patrolling, it would be a big help. Best, -- Diannaa ( talk) 03:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, EvergreenFir, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr ( talk) 05:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC) |
![]() |
in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape article you say citations aren't required for sources mentioned in the body of the article. 1) It's better if they are. 2) In this case they are not. There is no Justice Department citation. The only figure from the justice department in the body stated 8% not 2% and the line of most sources cite between 1.5 and 8 % had no bearing in reality as more than half of the sources in the body had percentages in double figures. These articles have to be based in reality not what you want to be reality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.129.113.158 ( talk) 06:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
This user is still vandalizing the pages. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Bad_Girls_Club_(season_4)&action=edit&undoafter=650836835&undo=650973208 <- I undid his edit.
-SalemCrow — Preceding unsigned comment added by SalemCrow101 ( talk • contribs) 16:01, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
... you are an enrichment for this community. Lucentcalendar ( talk) 17:01, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
at a redent edit at
Male privilege, "particularly in jobs which are considered to be of high value to society, such as doctors or architects." ( i just added architects) and am wondering how we can reconcile this statement with this one
the answer (i.e., my [opinion]]) idsthat the issue is not that doctors are seen as being valuable to society but rather that they are very well paid in the US & UK. So . . . . .....? Carptrash ( talk) 22:53, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
You are at UA, right? Do you know a Dr. Kvaran there? She is a cat person too. Carptrash ( talk) 05:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Why restore incivil comments by PtF and then ask not to do it? I'd prefer help in keeping them down i don't believe I made any comments about him or removed any comments he made about content, only his comments about me. -- DHeyward ( talk) 04:41, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Can you please check WP:SPEEDY and then self-revert? Abecedare ( talk) 07:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Recently I came across what I considered a micro-aggression (not against me, but in article). Do you consider yourself knowledgeable about gender related micro-aggressions? -- DHeyward ( talk) 05:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm generally a protectionist in BLPs be they of any political view or faction, so it brings me great alarm when I see anyone who does nothing else but add negativity to a BLP. I get alarmed and rightfully should when this occurs, so my questioning of motives was more a strong suggestion that other things besides just the negative could surely be improved. Its staggering to see so much effort spend on adding negativity and so little on neutral mundane issues that are needed.-- MONGO 06:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Please turn off your Twinkle bot as it's inadvertently vandalizing pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.92.94 ( talk) 18:41, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
My edit to List of Steven Universe episodes was not unsourced! It's short summary can be easily viewed here! ( http://the-world-of-steven-universe.tumblr.com/post/114169735046/steven-and-the-cool-kids-make-an-interesting) my edit was not false! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.53.75 ( talk) 02:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it's worth hanging around and reverting that comment, but that's just me. ekips39 ( talk) 04:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Evergreen, I noticed you just reverted a ton of BS cat edits from IP 2604:2000:a038:8900:48ef:c8bb:d609:8d91. I was just trying to get my mass rollback tool sorted out (I added it a while back, but it didn't work properly and I think I applied it to the wrong page.), and just when I was gonna test it out, I saw that the IP's edits had been reverted. Are you using a tool for this, or did you do it manually? (Feel free to reply here if you'd like) Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 03:41, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radical feminism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milieu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
While I didn't sign....do not alter my postings especially if they are not unwelcomed by the other user. Thank you.-- MONGO 18:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Pursuant to section 3a of an arbitration motion, you were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. Please note: being listed as a party does not imply any wrongdoing nor mean that there will necessarily be findings of fact or remedies regarding that party. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 14, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, -- L235 ( t / c / ping in reply) by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Evergreen. Your rejection of my contribution to the Gangs in the United Kingdom article ([ here]) wasn't sufficiently explained. Can you elaborate on why you thought it wasn't a constructive addition? I used multiple sources throughout. What was your problem with the content sourced from: http://www.octf.gov.uk/organised-crime-in-northern-ireland/organised-immigration-crime.aspx ? And why did you use this as a reason for rejecting all of the Belfast section? 77.99.12.140 ( talk) 19:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
To answer a question, two cases are being opened. The other case, American Politics 2, is also being opened. Robert McClenon ( talk) 22:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 7, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:51, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your reverting of vandalism on " S&M"! — ₳aron 09:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC) |
Can you explain what I could've done different to not have this edit reverted? The issue is definitely a men's rights issue Shazen27 ( talk) 03:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear Evergreen, I'M sry if I caused any trouble. I'm a new wikipedia user and I didn't know these rules or what they mean. I don't know why but Artemis Panthar keeps deleting my summary of the Steven Universe Episode Joy Ride. What should I do? HawsBoss
PS but I don't know how to make a new edit tab sry. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
HawsBoss (
talk •
contribs)
Reply: Evergreen. As I said before I am a new user and will look into the guidelines in the future. I just wanted people to know the summaries of steven universe episodes. Please forgive me. Hawsboss — Preceding unsigned comment added by HawsBoss ( talk • contribs) 11:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)