![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Erigu has not edited Wikipedia since June 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I'm going by the dialog in the ADV release. Are you saying there's an error in it? -- BrokenSphere Msg me 21:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
While you are entitled to your own opinion in regards to the spelling, it is common courteousy to create discussions on at least one talk page to discuss such edits, especially since edit wars have occurred over this same topic in the past. Also, considering the vast amount of pages in the category and the time it takes to edit them, it is best that no edits to the capitalization be made until a decision has been reached, since no one wants or should have to go back and forth editting that many articles. TwilightRukia ( talk) 06:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Um, sorry? Who is Jade? TwilightRukia ( talk) 07:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the speculation about Mono in that article. — Politizer( talk • contribs ) 14:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Your edits to Characters of Final Fantasy X and X-2 have also been very helpful; just try to remember to give edit summaries! Thanks again, — Politizer( talk • contribs ) 15:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Are you sure you're not a girl? Fragments of Jade seems awfully certain that you are. And she's usually right. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 22:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Mmkay, here's the best quote I found reading the dispute you had:
(eats popcorn). The funny part is, while I take no sides, Collectonian, Erigu is logically mopping the floor with you... :-) Tan | 39 16:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Now... the goal for a better article might involve logically mopping the floor; but we do that with arguments, not by going at it with editors (ever. at all). I don't know the details behind this dispute (A/M not my area of expertise whatsoever)... while you may make many good points (I don't doubt it), I think the way they're being presented is half the problem... largely, I think, because it puts another editor in a defensive position. So you're at war before you're even discussing.
Does that make any sense? I'll continue this line of conversation if you have any questions/comments/complaints :-) Xavexgoem ( talk) 19:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC) You will love this essay; please read it :-p
I'm not entirely sure I understand your position regarding the home versions of Tekken 6. Do you think they should be addressed in a "port" section (which doesn't exist as of now)? The articles about the other games in the series tend to mention both arcade and home versions in the same infobox, and I'm tempted to point out that lots of video game articles do that as well, when different versions are released...
Is that because the home versions aren't officially titled "Tekken 6" yet (nor "Tekken 6 Bloodline Rebellion", for that matter)? Erigu ( talk) 22:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I think this is everyone's favourite editor again. Mr T (Based) ( talk) 22:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
I would strongly advise you to stop tracking FOJ socks and to stop antagonizing them when you find them. Harassment isn't less harassment just because it's a problem user. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire - past ops) 07:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Do you know who are the ones that defeat Mukai and Magaki (before being killed by Shion) in the KOF games? In Mukai, it is commented it was possible K, but there are other comments. The same goes for Chizuru and Maki. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 00:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you wrote that parts 1-4 of the Earl Cain series weren't given a common title. Not sound like I'm doubting you or trying to be mean, but do you have a source for that? Kaguya-chan ( talk) 20:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Do you understand what I was trying to say? I wasn't siding either side. I am going by what our policies and guidelines at Wikipedia say, and especially about neutrality aspect. Since there are 2 naming schemes for the series (not individual games), in the lead it needs to be mentioned that some games go by "Wild Arms" and some by "Wild ARMs" and that we do not take the company's word for it unless their is a dispute among reliable sources how they say it. Something like:
The Wild Arms (ワイルドアームズ, Wairudo Āmuzu) series, also known as Wild ARMs, is a collection of role-playing video games and related media developed by Japanese software company Media.Vision. Since the launch of the original Wild Arms title in 1996,
The fact is I believe European releases are known by the latter as well, and those also need to be taken into consideration as well as reviewers and North American release. じん ない 04:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
That's good, especially since they obviously are not listening and appear to be intentionally disruptive. Btw, I was more implying that Japan doesn't air OVAs concurrently on TV, meaning there'd be no reason to air the OVA on TV at the same time it was being sold in stores, but there was not enough space in the edit box to explain this.-- 十 八 05:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not being disruptive. You two are. The official site says it aired on TV, you can see the TV-taped episodes on YouTube, and someone currently living in Japan even said it is airing. You just refuse to admit you're wrong and continue to edit war. PrincessMint ( talk) 05:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Erigu, you need to grow up. Maybe the admins here are blind to how you are acting, but that can't last forever. Stop editing articles you don't care about. Stop editing articles for games you have never played and shows you have never seen. It's an insult to those of us who are actual fans. You don't know everything, so just quit it. And most importantly, stop it with your nasty little attitude. I came here to edit, and I should be able to do so without your harassment. PrincessMint ( talk) 05:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Is there no statement you won't try to twist to suit your own purposes? Nothing I just said makes me look like a sockpuppet. Enough is enough. Stop acting like a bratty kid and start putting some actual thoughts into your edits! PrincessMint ( talk) 06:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Guys, is there some way I could help? We seem to have a bit of a brushfire, here. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire - past ops) 06:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Who? Seriously, stop it. You have got to be breaking some rules. Why won't an admin stop this person? PrincessMint ( talk) 06:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Neither of you explained what's going on. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire - past ops) 06:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
It's the other way around. Regardless of whether my edit was wrong or right, let's take a look at how it happened. I made an edit. Erigu reverted edit, didn't give any reason. Goes to my profile, tells me I'm a sockpuppet. Asks for a CheckUser. Goes to the profiles of two other people, whom I'm in an editing disagreement with, and tells them I'm a sockpuppet and will be banned soon. Inserts himself into those disputes and starts undoing any edits I make, making up whatever reason he can. I repeatedly ask him to stop, you can see his general attitude above, where he quotes my posts over and over and just says "BS". I'm fed up. This guy is intolerable. And now this. I searched. There is no "SyberiaWinx" here. He's been accusing me of being a sockpuppet of a user that doesn't exist! PrincessMint ( talk) 07:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Man oh man. What in the bloody blue blazes are you arguing about? A link to an article or a talk page or something, please. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire - past ops) 07:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The article is not the issue. The issue is how Erigu is behaving, and from the looks of his contributions, how he's been behaving for quite some time. It didn't matter what the edit was, as long as I edited any article that Erigu frequents. There is no "assuming good faith" with this guy. The article in question is the Haunting Ground article. He didn't like my edit, but instead of discussing it, he reverted it without reason, then proceeded to say I was a sockpuppet. Then he went and told other people I was a sockpuppet, damaging my credibility in the disputes we were having. Is this not against some rule here? And he's apparently done it over and over again before. I've been as patient as possible and asked him multiple times to stop, but I'm seriously fed up. PrincessMint ( talk) 07:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Got a diff handy on one of the deleted user talk comments? — C.Fred ( talk) 06:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
According to the rules here, it is okay to delete things from your own talk page, especially if they are hostile. PrincessMint ( talk) 07:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Please see my discussion on the Soulcalibur talk page. "Souru" is not how WP:MOS-JA tells us how to romanize the word and the trademark in Japan is different than that in the US/UK/EU trademarks.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 11:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
After some time has settled down that the name "Project Trico" is no longer the major association with the game, it would make sense to move it out of the lead or at least not as pronounced. However, given that the new title "The Last Guardian" is (as I write this) less than a day old, it's important to note that it replaces "Project Trico" as the official name of the project. -- MASEM ( t) 17:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Well, that's fine, then. That serves me right for not looking up the definition of romaji... I've put your edit back in place. Thanks for letting me know. BAPACop ( converse) 03:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
List of Castlevania media. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Megata Sanshiro (
talk) 11:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I recently went to a link of leo's profile [4] but leo is STILL locked from the main character list [5] The profile also seems unfinished(lacking picures other then the two cg arts) making me think that it is set up to keep the conversation of leo's gender going. Seeing as many sites are split on the gender debat [6] should we just leave the gender of the character ambigous until proper confermation. Also the arguement about tekkenpedia being USER submitted isn't very valid on a USER submitted website —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamersdan ( talk • contribs) 06:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Could you translate famitsu..also It's not an oficial namco site and your other two links do not work. I can give you the european site(sice leo is clickable from there though I think they may have done that to keep both new audiences in the dark.(since it's not hard for an english speaking american to go to the europe site and click english but I could be wrong, so I give you that. The only other source I have is fighters generation but I only have this link
[12] that goes to leo's profile. I've contacted the admin to give me the nfo he had up 2 years ago during tekken 6's release in the arcades in japan. The only other thing I have is a friend who plays the arcade game..not really a notible scource lol. I'll keep in contact and If get the info I'll come here and put the links up(If I feel they are good scources for information)and if not..meh I'll just wait for the game to come out and be proven right or wrong. Sorry If I come off as agressive —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gamersdan (
talk •
contribs) 13:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Well the choice of having "Name (saint of )" was due to Lost Canvas having many more Saints. (And it looks more proper) ;) But i see your point in having their names like that. Though let me fix it so that the constellation link is still in there ^^
I didn't know that kaitoz was changed in later volumes, I did know that Dio was Dios in the anime but no in the serialization. I'm gonna check it out somehow ^^ -- Refuteku ( talk) 18:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Erigu, back in September 2008, you added the original Japanese release dates and ISBNs to List of Battle Angel Alita chapters. However, at the time you didn't supply any sources. I recently started updating the list again, and sourced the volumes to Amazon.co.jp, but it unfortunately only supplies the month+year of release. Do you remember where you found these dates, and if so, could you replace the Amazon refs with your source(s)? Thanks in advance! -- Dinoguy1000 ( talk · contribs) as 67.58.229.153 ( talk) 06:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
{{cite book |last1=Kishiro |first1=Yukito |authorlink1=Yukito Kishiro |title=銃夢 |trans_title=Battle Angel Alita |volume=1 |date=September 24, 1991 |publisher=Shueisha |location=Japan |language=Japanese |isbn=978-4-08-875071-2 |page=pg#}}
The following parameters need to be changed for each volume: volume
(the volume number), date
(the Japanese release date), isbn
(the volume's ISBN number), and page
(the page number you found the volume's release date on). If you can provide a specific city for location
, that would be good as well. Don't worry too much about getting the formatting just right; I'll come in behind you and clean up as/if necessary. ;) Also, while you're at it (and once again assuming you have the original Japanese volumes), could you provide the serialization dates for the series? If I understand correctly, the Japanese volumes usually indicate where and when the material was originally serialized. Thanks in advance! 「
ダイノガイ
千?!」
? ·
Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey sorry about the whole Rene Lune thing. i had no idea the japanese used to transliterate Rene to Rune, i checked it out with other Rene's and you're right.
I'm gonna go and change Raskmoon to Lascoumoune while i'm at it ^^ -- Refuteku ( talk) 21:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Stand (JoJo's Bizarre Adventure). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stand (JoJo's Bizarre Adventure). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I noticed you've been making quite a few edits to the main Teito Monogatari page lately. I must ask...are you familiar with the series in any intimate way? Have you read any of the books? Please contact me back at my talk page. I was the user who began those articles in the first place. Voilodion ( talk) 3:33PM, 24 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.28.162.103 ( talk)
cool job... i almost make the revision from fake translation... thanks god you are here, Cheers! Ald™ ¬_¬™ 08:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Could you please tell me the source where you're getting these spellings from? As far as I am aware, the only volume that was ever officially translated into English was Stardust Crusaders.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 16:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Right! Sorry for my rash revert. Seeing your talk page, it is obvious you are very experienced with Japanese video games and/or the Japanese language. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 12:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Just to let you know, the IP who has edited the Earl Cain article appears to be a sock of Fragments of Jade. I have contacted Salvidrim ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) about the situation. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 18:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Latest official spelling is Bruno Buccellati. Don't switch to "Blono" again, please.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 10:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Could you give me the source for the new voice actors? And explain why you reordered everyone's position in the list from the order of revelation? And why you removed Joseph's age when the Stardust Crusaders version is not yet confirmed to be unplayable?— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 12:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Takashichea, the 3rd Admin in Sket Dance Wikia. I'm asking for your help in translating the names of the chapters that my teammates and I had difficulty in.
You can leave your answers at the Sket Dance Wikia blog if you like. Thank you.
Takashichea ( talk) 09:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sengoku Basara episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nene and Satsuma ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Apologies assumed and accepted, Ryulong!
Hopefully, you will take those two minutes to actually check before reverting and admonishing, in the future. Not holding my breath (in fact, I'm half-expecting you to see this the next time you pull that one), but that would be nice. Erigu ( talk) 23:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Stop effing edit warring over me with this over the past week. If you have an issue with the translation, take it to the article's talk page like a normal god damn person and begin a discussion. I have yet to see any reason from you that this phrase should be translated as "This Is Baoh!!" instead of "I Am Baoh!!". Both are valid translations from Japanese into English and unless you have some magical insight as to what the context should be for "This Is Baoh" instead of "I Am Baoh" which you've yet to say why.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 04:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
From what I'm finding online I think it's both.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 07:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Erigu. I have the same problem you have: English isn't my first language. You're probably right but we can check it asking in the A/M project or in the talk page of the MoS if you're not sure. I just changed "yet" to "Yet" to to conform with the article's title. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 15:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Does Viz actually spell her name like that?
If so, how did they explain the "Seiko" bit, then? I mean... *sigh* Erigu ( talk) 13:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Dude, stop removing this word. You made a bold change, and I reverted it. Further restorations to the preferred version which clearly does not have consensus is edit warring.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 16:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you're invited to vote and express your views about this on the discussion topic. Jotamide ( talk) 23:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Attack on Titan may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Where are you getting your translations? Because my dictionaries say 火種 is "live coals" and never "flash point".— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 03:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to the And Yet the Town Moves article. Per Merriam Webster's Japanese-English Dictionary, p. 871 ( ISBN 0877791643; OCLC 28634649) "sore de mo" is the correct romanization of "それでも". This is supported by the romanization used in the Japanese particles article for " de mo". Would you please be so kind as to roll back your edit?— DocWatson42 ( talk) 05:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Erigu. About the English titles and the number of episodes, sorry, I've corrected them (I'm doubt to use Mushi-Shi -Next Passage- or Mushi-Shi: Next Passage as the second is the most usual format for subtitles). About the airdates, see this discusion; I'm supporter to keep the dates as they are (because of WP:V) and put explanatory notes. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 15:25, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please don't do a cut and paste move. If you want to move the page to a new title, open a move request or request it as a non-controversial technical move. G S Palmer ( talk • contribs) 13:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Here's the warning note: "Spellings such as Yeager and Wall Sheena may differ in unofficial translations. Nevertheless, all names and spellings in this article should follow the official English translation of the manga by Kodansha Comics USA (translations found in the Funimation edition of the anime can also be included, but they should not supercede each other). If you have evidence that a spelling should be changed, bring it up for discussion at Talk:Attack on Titan."
So please use Wall Sheena when referring to the general franchise, including the chapters and characters list. The only time you can use Wall Sina is for the episodes as dubbed by Funimation. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Erigu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, maxdefolsch here. In case you don't check Reddit these days, I sent you a PM about a possible new story that you could add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.89.87.141 ( talk) 01:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Erigu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Erigu has not edited Wikipedia since June 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I'm going by the dialog in the ADV release. Are you saying there's an error in it? -- BrokenSphere Msg me 21:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
While you are entitled to your own opinion in regards to the spelling, it is common courteousy to create discussions on at least one talk page to discuss such edits, especially since edit wars have occurred over this same topic in the past. Also, considering the vast amount of pages in the category and the time it takes to edit them, it is best that no edits to the capitalization be made until a decision has been reached, since no one wants or should have to go back and forth editting that many articles. TwilightRukia ( talk) 06:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Um, sorry? Who is Jade? TwilightRukia ( talk) 07:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the speculation about Mono in that article. — Politizer( talk • contribs ) 14:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Your edits to Characters of Final Fantasy X and X-2 have also been very helpful; just try to remember to give edit summaries! Thanks again, — Politizer( talk • contribs ) 15:39, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Are you sure you're not a girl? Fragments of Jade seems awfully certain that you are. And she's usually right. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 22:00, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Mmkay, here's the best quote I found reading the dispute you had:
(eats popcorn). The funny part is, while I take no sides, Collectonian, Erigu is logically mopping the floor with you... :-) Tan | 39 16:52, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
Now... the goal for a better article might involve logically mopping the floor; but we do that with arguments, not by going at it with editors (ever. at all). I don't know the details behind this dispute (A/M not my area of expertise whatsoever)... while you may make many good points (I don't doubt it), I think the way they're being presented is half the problem... largely, I think, because it puts another editor in a defensive position. So you're at war before you're even discussing.
Does that make any sense? I'll continue this line of conversation if you have any questions/comments/complaints :-) Xavexgoem ( talk) 19:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC) You will love this essay; please read it :-p
I'm not entirely sure I understand your position regarding the home versions of Tekken 6. Do you think they should be addressed in a "port" section (which doesn't exist as of now)? The articles about the other games in the series tend to mention both arcade and home versions in the same infobox, and I'm tempted to point out that lots of video game articles do that as well, when different versions are released...
Is that because the home versions aren't officially titled "Tekken 6" yet (nor "Tekken 6 Bloodline Rebellion", for that matter)? Erigu ( talk) 22:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
I think this is everyone's favourite editor again. Mr T (Based) ( talk) 22:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
I would strongly advise you to stop tracking FOJ socks and to stop antagonizing them when you find them. Harassment isn't less harassment just because it's a problem user. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire - past ops) 07:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Do you know who are the ones that defeat Mukai and Magaki (before being killed by Shion) in the KOF games? In Mukai, it is commented it was possible K, but there are other comments. The same goes for Chizuru and Maki. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 00:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you wrote that parts 1-4 of the Earl Cain series weren't given a common title. Not sound like I'm doubting you or trying to be mean, but do you have a source for that? Kaguya-chan ( talk) 20:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Do you understand what I was trying to say? I wasn't siding either side. I am going by what our policies and guidelines at Wikipedia say, and especially about neutrality aspect. Since there are 2 naming schemes for the series (not individual games), in the lead it needs to be mentioned that some games go by "Wild Arms" and some by "Wild ARMs" and that we do not take the company's word for it unless their is a dispute among reliable sources how they say it. Something like:
The Wild Arms (ワイルドアームズ, Wairudo Āmuzu) series, also known as Wild ARMs, is a collection of role-playing video games and related media developed by Japanese software company Media.Vision. Since the launch of the original Wild Arms title in 1996,
The fact is I believe European releases are known by the latter as well, and those also need to be taken into consideration as well as reviewers and North American release. じん ない 04:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
That's good, especially since they obviously are not listening and appear to be intentionally disruptive. Btw, I was more implying that Japan doesn't air OVAs concurrently on TV, meaning there'd be no reason to air the OVA on TV at the same time it was being sold in stores, but there was not enough space in the edit box to explain this.-- 十 八 05:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not being disruptive. You two are. The official site says it aired on TV, you can see the TV-taped episodes on YouTube, and someone currently living in Japan even said it is airing. You just refuse to admit you're wrong and continue to edit war. PrincessMint ( talk) 05:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Erigu, you need to grow up. Maybe the admins here are blind to how you are acting, but that can't last forever. Stop editing articles you don't care about. Stop editing articles for games you have never played and shows you have never seen. It's an insult to those of us who are actual fans. You don't know everything, so just quit it. And most importantly, stop it with your nasty little attitude. I came here to edit, and I should be able to do so without your harassment. PrincessMint ( talk) 05:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Is there no statement you won't try to twist to suit your own purposes? Nothing I just said makes me look like a sockpuppet. Enough is enough. Stop acting like a bratty kid and start putting some actual thoughts into your edits! PrincessMint ( talk) 06:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Guys, is there some way I could help? We seem to have a bit of a brushfire, here. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire - past ops) 06:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Who? Seriously, stop it. You have got to be breaking some rules. Why won't an admin stop this person? PrincessMint ( talk) 06:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Neither of you explained what's going on. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire - past ops) 06:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
It's the other way around. Regardless of whether my edit was wrong or right, let's take a look at how it happened. I made an edit. Erigu reverted edit, didn't give any reason. Goes to my profile, tells me I'm a sockpuppet. Asks for a CheckUser. Goes to the profiles of two other people, whom I'm in an editing disagreement with, and tells them I'm a sockpuppet and will be banned soon. Inserts himself into those disputes and starts undoing any edits I make, making up whatever reason he can. I repeatedly ask him to stop, you can see his general attitude above, where he quotes my posts over and over and just says "BS". I'm fed up. This guy is intolerable. And now this. I searched. There is no "SyberiaWinx" here. He's been accusing me of being a sockpuppet of a user that doesn't exist! PrincessMint ( talk) 07:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Man oh man. What in the bloody blue blazes are you arguing about? A link to an article or a talk page or something, please. - A Man In Bl♟ck ( conspire - past ops) 07:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
The article is not the issue. The issue is how Erigu is behaving, and from the looks of his contributions, how he's been behaving for quite some time. It didn't matter what the edit was, as long as I edited any article that Erigu frequents. There is no "assuming good faith" with this guy. The article in question is the Haunting Ground article. He didn't like my edit, but instead of discussing it, he reverted it without reason, then proceeded to say I was a sockpuppet. Then he went and told other people I was a sockpuppet, damaging my credibility in the disputes we were having. Is this not against some rule here? And he's apparently done it over and over again before. I've been as patient as possible and asked him multiple times to stop, but I'm seriously fed up. PrincessMint ( talk) 07:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Got a diff handy on one of the deleted user talk comments? — C.Fred ( talk) 06:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
According to the rules here, it is okay to delete things from your own talk page, especially if they are hostile. PrincessMint ( talk) 07:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Please see my discussion on the Soulcalibur talk page. "Souru" is not how WP:MOS-JA tells us how to romanize the word and the trademark in Japan is different than that in the US/UK/EU trademarks.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 11:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
After some time has settled down that the name "Project Trico" is no longer the major association with the game, it would make sense to move it out of the lead or at least not as pronounced. However, given that the new title "The Last Guardian" is (as I write this) less than a day old, it's important to note that it replaces "Project Trico" as the official name of the project. -- MASEM ( t) 17:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Well, that's fine, then. That serves me right for not looking up the definition of romaji... I've put your edit back in place. Thanks for letting me know. BAPACop ( converse) 03:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
List of Castlevania media. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
Megata Sanshiro (
talk) 11:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I recently went to a link of leo's profile [4] but leo is STILL locked from the main character list [5] The profile also seems unfinished(lacking picures other then the two cg arts) making me think that it is set up to keep the conversation of leo's gender going. Seeing as many sites are split on the gender debat [6] should we just leave the gender of the character ambigous until proper confermation. Also the arguement about tekkenpedia being USER submitted isn't very valid on a USER submitted website —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamersdan ( talk • contribs) 06:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Could you translate famitsu..also It's not an oficial namco site and your other two links do not work. I can give you the european site(sice leo is clickable from there though I think they may have done that to keep both new audiences in the dark.(since it's not hard for an english speaking american to go to the europe site and click english but I could be wrong, so I give you that. The only other source I have is fighters generation but I only have this link
[12] that goes to leo's profile. I've contacted the admin to give me the nfo he had up 2 years ago during tekken 6's release in the arcades in japan. The only other thing I have is a friend who plays the arcade game..not really a notible scource lol. I'll keep in contact and If get the info I'll come here and put the links up(If I feel they are good scources for information)and if not..meh I'll just wait for the game to come out and be proven right or wrong. Sorry If I come off as agressive —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gamersdan (
talk •
contribs) 13:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Well the choice of having "Name (saint of )" was due to Lost Canvas having many more Saints. (And it looks more proper) ;) But i see your point in having their names like that. Though let me fix it so that the constellation link is still in there ^^
I didn't know that kaitoz was changed in later volumes, I did know that Dio was Dios in the anime but no in the serialization. I'm gonna check it out somehow ^^ -- Refuteku ( talk) 18:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi Erigu, back in September 2008, you added the original Japanese release dates and ISBNs to List of Battle Angel Alita chapters. However, at the time you didn't supply any sources. I recently started updating the list again, and sourced the volumes to Amazon.co.jp, but it unfortunately only supplies the month+year of release. Do you remember where you found these dates, and if so, could you replace the Amazon refs with your source(s)? Thanks in advance! -- Dinoguy1000 ( talk · contribs) as 67.58.229.153 ( talk) 06:45, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
{{cite book |last1=Kishiro |first1=Yukito |authorlink1=Yukito Kishiro |title=銃夢 |trans_title=Battle Angel Alita |volume=1 |date=September 24, 1991 |publisher=Shueisha |location=Japan |language=Japanese |isbn=978-4-08-875071-2 |page=pg#}}
The following parameters need to be changed for each volume: volume
(the volume number), date
(the Japanese release date), isbn
(the volume's ISBN number), and page
(the page number you found the volume's release date on). If you can provide a specific city for location
, that would be good as well. Don't worry too much about getting the formatting just right; I'll come in behind you and clean up as/if necessary. ;) Also, while you're at it (and once again assuming you have the original Japanese volumes), could you provide the serialization dates for the series? If I understand correctly, the Japanese volumes usually indicate where and when the material was originally serialized. Thanks in advance! 「
ダイノガイ
千?!」
? ·
Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey sorry about the whole Rene Lune thing. i had no idea the japanese used to transliterate Rene to Rune, i checked it out with other Rene's and you're right.
I'm gonna go and change Raskmoon to Lascoumoune while i'm at it ^^ -- Refuteku ( talk) 21:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Stand (JoJo's Bizarre Adventure). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stand (JoJo's Bizarre Adventure). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I noticed you've been making quite a few edits to the main Teito Monogatari page lately. I must ask...are you familiar with the series in any intimate way? Have you read any of the books? Please contact me back at my talk page. I was the user who began those articles in the first place. Voilodion ( talk) 3:33PM, 24 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.28.162.103 ( talk)
cool job... i almost make the revision from fake translation... thanks god you are here, Cheers! Ald™ ¬_¬™ 08:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Could you please tell me the source where you're getting these spellings from? As far as I am aware, the only volume that was ever officially translated into English was Stardust Crusaders.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 16:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Right! Sorry for my rash revert. Seeing your talk page, it is obvious you are very experienced with Japanese video games and/or the Japanese language. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 12:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Just to let you know, the IP who has edited the Earl Cain article appears to be a sock of Fragments of Jade. I have contacted Salvidrim ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) about the situation. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 18:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Latest official spelling is Bruno Buccellati. Don't switch to "Blono" again, please.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 10:03, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Could you give me the source for the new voice actors? And explain why you reordered everyone's position in the list from the order of revelation? And why you removed Joseph's age when the Stardust Crusaders version is not yet confirmed to be unplayable?— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 12:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Takashichea, the 3rd Admin in Sket Dance Wikia. I'm asking for your help in translating the names of the chapters that my teammates and I had difficulty in.
You can leave your answers at the Sket Dance Wikia blog if you like. Thank you.
Takashichea ( talk) 09:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sengoku Basara episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nene and Satsuma ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Apologies assumed and accepted, Ryulong!
Hopefully, you will take those two minutes to actually check before reverting and admonishing, in the future. Not holding my breath (in fact, I'm half-expecting you to see this the next time you pull that one), but that would be nice. Erigu ( talk) 23:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Stop effing edit warring over me with this over the past week. If you have an issue with the translation, take it to the article's talk page like a normal god damn person and begin a discussion. I have yet to see any reason from you that this phrase should be translated as "This Is Baoh!!" instead of "I Am Baoh!!". Both are valid translations from Japanese into English and unless you have some magical insight as to what the context should be for "This Is Baoh" instead of "I Am Baoh" which you've yet to say why.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 04:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
From what I'm finding online I think it's both.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 07:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Erigu. I have the same problem you have: English isn't my first language. You're probably right but we can check it asking in the A/M project or in the talk page of the MoS if you're not sure. I just changed "yet" to "Yet" to to conform with the article's title. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 15:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Does Viz actually spell her name like that?
If so, how did they explain the "Seiko" bit, then? I mean... *sigh* Erigu ( talk) 13:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Dude, stop removing this word. You made a bold change, and I reverted it. Further restorations to the preferred version which clearly does not have consensus is edit warring.— Ryulong ( 琉竜) 16:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you're invited to vote and express your views about this on the discussion topic. Jotamide ( talk) 23:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Attack on Titan may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Where are you getting your translations? Because my dictionaries say 火種 is "live coals" and never "flash point".— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜) 03:41, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Greetings and felicitations. I noticed that you reverted my edit to the And Yet the Town Moves article. Per Merriam Webster's Japanese-English Dictionary, p. 871 ( ISBN 0877791643; OCLC 28634649) "sore de mo" is the correct romanization of "それでも". This is supported by the romanization used in the Japanese particles article for " de mo". Would you please be so kind as to roll back your edit?— DocWatson42 ( talk) 05:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Erigu. About the English titles and the number of episodes, sorry, I've corrected them (I'm doubt to use Mushi-Shi -Next Passage- or Mushi-Shi: Next Passage as the second is the most usual format for subtitles). About the airdates, see this discusion; I'm supporter to keep the dates as they are (because of WP:V) and put explanatory notes. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 15:25, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please don't do a cut and paste move. If you want to move the page to a new title, open a move request or request it as a non-controversial technical move. G S Palmer ( talk • contribs) 13:32, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
Here's the warning note: "Spellings such as Yeager and Wall Sheena may differ in unofficial translations. Nevertheless, all names and spellings in this article should follow the official English translation of the manga by Kodansha Comics USA (translations found in the Funimation edition of the anime can also be included, but they should not supercede each other). If you have evidence that a spelling should be changed, bring it up for discussion at Talk:Attack on Titan."
So please use Wall Sheena when referring to the general franchise, including the chapters and characters list. The only time you can use Wall Sina is for the episodes as dubbed by Funimation. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Erigu. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, maxdefolsch here. In case you don't check Reddit these days, I sent you a PM about a possible new story that you could add. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.89.87.141 ( talk) 01:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Erigu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)