Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Eculizumab. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Fvasconcellos (
t·
c)
18:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please explain why the safety section is "no longer required"? Best wishes, Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 19:18, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi -
I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your lengthy revision to Ezulizumab primarily for two reasons. One is that the majority of your changes were describing PNH, not eculizumab. The second is because of the style; your edits read like a textbook or a poster rather than an encyclopedia article. May I suggest reviewing the
manual of style and moving forward from there?
Cheers Wawot1 ( talk) 02:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Eculizumab. When removing content, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Fvasconcellos (
t·
c)
18:35, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please explain why the safety section is "no longer required"? Best wishes, Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 19:18, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi -
I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your lengthy revision to Ezulizumab primarily for two reasons. One is that the majority of your changes were describing PNH, not eculizumab. The second is because of the style; your edits read like a textbook or a poster rather than an encyclopedia article. May I suggest reviewing the
manual of style and moving forward from there?
Cheers Wawot1 ( talk) 02:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)