Hello, Erenyeager008! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
![]() |
---|
|
|
Jauerback dude?/ dude. 14:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice and suggestions. I'll do my best in contributing to Wikipedia Erenyeager008 ( talk) 14:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
The Revenant (2015 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Prairie
Astronomer
Contributions
15:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
It was a mistake. Thanks for your advice and suggestions. Erenyeager008 ( talk) 16:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Miner Editor. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Dark Shadows (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Miner Editor (
talk)
02:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
It was a mistake. Thanks for your advice Erenyeager008 ( talk) 03:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
John Wick (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Chompy Ace
11:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
I will take care of that. Thanks for your suggestion Erenyeager008 ( talk) 19:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
K.G.F: Chapter 2—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
DarkAudit (
talk)
08:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
K.G.F: Chapter 2, you may be
blocked from editing.
Miner Editor (
talk)
06:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 20:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Ok I get understand Erenyeager008 ( talk) 01:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
I mean I understand. Erenyeager008 ( talk) 01:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
House of the Dragon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks. ~~
lol1VNIO (I made a mistake?
talk to me)
17:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Barbie (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
You have been warned multiple times now for edit warring and disruptive editing. You've continued this pattern of behavior at Star Wars: The Last Jedi with edits like this one, followed by repeated attempts here and here. Despite acknowledging you understand, it is clear that you don't. You may be blocked from editing if you continue to be disruptive.
This is your last warning. Any response here, including the deletion of this message, will be taken as evidence you have read it. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 12:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Erenyeager008 reported by User:Nemov (Result: ). Thank you.
Nemov (
talk)
18:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
20:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Your recent editing history at Adipurush shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 08:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Adipurush. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Ronsaur (
talk)
02:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
05:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Justin Bieber, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
--WikiUser1234945-- (
talk)
16:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Oppenheimer (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ภץאคгöร 12:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2001: A Space Odyssey, you may be
blocked from editing.
Barry Wom (
talk)
12:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
You are attempting to start an edit war on both the Oppenheimer and Barbie pages in regards to the Barbenheimer phenomenon. I see you have a history of starting edit wars and temporary bans from editing. Please disengage from continuing to delete and instead go to the talk page on either article; a topic has been created on both in regards to Barbenheimer. BakedintheHole ( talk) 12:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
About an hour ago, an editor made a complaint against you at Daniel Case's Talk page and you reverted it. Your removal was clearly an attempt to avoid scrutiny for allegations of edit-warring posted to an administrator who has blocked you twice in the past for edit-warring. I've restored the other user's post, but consider this a warning. If I see you messing around with other editors' Talk pages again, you risk being blocked.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
17:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Erenyeager008 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm unable to understand as to why I'm blocked from editing; my edits on Oppenheimer page are constructive. I admit I deleted some sentences on the page but that's because I found it valid to do so, as many phrasing on the page is awkward and feel skewed toward a negative perception of the film
Decline reason:
You aren't blocked because of the contents of your edits, you are blocked for edit warring, the same reason you were previously blocked. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
. Erenyeager008 ( talk) 17:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
17:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)I have decided to do this because I still believe that you can edit productively and collaboratively, and now you have the rest of the project to demonstrate this. Alternatively, if you don't, this block can be extended to other pages or even the whole site. It's up to you. Daniel Case ( talk) 17:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
13:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Hello, Erenyeager008! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your
talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
![]() |
---|
|
|
Jauerback dude?/ dude. 14:39, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice and suggestions. I'll do my best in contributing to Wikipedia Erenyeager008 ( talk) 14:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
The Revenant (2015 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Prairie
Astronomer
Contributions
15:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
It was a mistake. Thanks for your advice and suggestions. Erenyeager008 ( talk) 16:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Miner Editor. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Dark Shadows (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Miner Editor (
talk)
02:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
It was a mistake. Thanks for your advice Erenyeager008 ( talk) 03:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
John Wick (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Chompy Ace
11:23, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
I will take care of that. Thanks for your suggestion Erenyeager008 ( talk) 19:45, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
DarkAudit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
K.G.F: Chapter 2—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
DarkAudit (
talk)
08:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
K.G.F: Chapter 2, you may be
blocked from editing.
Miner Editor (
talk)
06:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 20:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Ok I get understand Erenyeager008 ( talk) 01:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
I mean I understand. Erenyeager008 ( talk) 01:37, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
House of the Dragon—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks. ~~
lol1VNIO (I made a mistake?
talk to me)
17:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Barbie (film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
07:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
You have been warned multiple times now for edit warring and disruptive editing. You've continued this pattern of behavior at Star Wars: The Last Jedi with edits like this one, followed by repeated attempts here and here. Despite acknowledging you understand, it is clear that you don't. You may be blocked from editing if you continue to be disruptive.
This is your last warning. Any response here, including the deletion of this message, will be taken as evidence you have read it. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 12:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Erenyeager008 reported by User:Nemov (Result: ). Thank you.
Nemov (
talk)
18:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
20:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Your recent editing history at Adipurush shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 08:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Adipurush. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Ronsaur (
talk)
02:35, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
05:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Justin Bieber, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
--WikiUser1234945-- (
talk)
16:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Oppenheimer (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ภץאคгöร 12:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2001: A Space Odyssey, you may be
blocked from editing.
Barry Wom (
talk)
12:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
You are attempting to start an edit war on both the Oppenheimer and Barbie pages in regards to the Barbenheimer phenomenon. I see you have a history of starting edit wars and temporary bans from editing. Please disengage from continuing to delete and instead go to the talk page on either article; a topic has been created on both in regards to Barbenheimer. BakedintheHole ( talk) 12:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
About an hour ago, an editor made a complaint against you at Daniel Case's Talk page and you reverted it. Your removal was clearly an attempt to avoid scrutiny for allegations of edit-warring posted to an administrator who has blocked you twice in the past for edit-warring. I've restored the other user's post, but consider this a warning. If I see you messing around with other editors' Talk pages again, you risk being blocked.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:11, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
17:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Erenyeager008 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm unable to understand as to why I'm blocked from editing; my edits on Oppenheimer page are constructive. I admit I deleted some sentences on the page but that's because I found it valid to do so, as many phrasing on the page is awkward and feel skewed toward a negative perception of the film
Decline reason:
You aren't blocked because of the contents of your edits, you are blocked for edit warring, the same reason you were previously blocked. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
. Erenyeager008 ( talk) 17:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
17:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)I have decided to do this because I still believe that you can edit productively and collaboratively, and now you have the rest of the project to demonstrate this. Alternatively, if you don't, this block can be extended to other pages or even the whole site. It's up to you. Daniel Case ( talk) 17:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
13:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)