This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You have previously expressed an interest in undergoing the Admin coaching program. We're currently engaged in a program reset to help things move more smoothly in the future. If you are still interested in the program, please go to Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching and re-list yourself under Current requests, deleting your entry from Older requests. Also, double-check to make sure coaching is right for you at the Coachee checklist; WP:Adoption or WP:Editor review may be more appropriate depending on your situation and aspirations. We should get back to you within a day or so, once a coaching relationship has been identified. Thank you. MBisanz talk 07:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I am pleased to announce that you have been paired with User:bibliomaniac15 as an admin coachee. You now have two important tasks to complete:
Given the limited coaching resources of the Admin Coaching project, if you plan to take a Wikibreak of more than 30 days, please notify your coach or myself so that we will know not to tag you as retired and give your spot to another user. Remember that adminship is not a big deal and that it may take multiple RfAs before one becomes a sysop, even for a highly qualified, coached, editor. Also, remember that while admin coaching will help you prepare for the mop, there is no guarantee that completing this program will ensure passage of an RfA.
Congratulations again, and happy editing. MBisanz talk 20:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
hi, this article was intended as a test article. i didn't realise i wasn't using the sandbox platform. can you move the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spectrumps ( talk • contribs) 14:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Well the relevant policy to quote is "The tag exists to give you some extra time; the page may still be deleted if it meets the speedy deletion criteria." at Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Speedy_deletion. Hangon means the requestor needs a couple minutes to fix whatever the problem is. But sometimes it can't be fixed. Like a copyvio can't be fixed just by adding the source link and Spam can't be fixed by adding more spam. And sometimes hangon is abused by people who put nonsense on the page and then contest it. As a new admin, I tend to jump over articles is hangon tags and leave them to more experienced admins. But I do know that the general rule is that even if its contested, it will eventually be speedied if it still violates one of the CSD rules. Hope that helps. MBisanz talk 19:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Dear Belinrahs,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! Unfortunately, your application has been declined because it seems that you don't have at least 500 edits. When you fulfill this requirement, feel free to re-apply.
AGK § 19:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~
Haemo recently made a checkuser request on a number of editors including you. This was completely illegal because he provided no evidence or plausible justification for it. Unfortunately the request was granted.
Most of those he checked up on, including me, are involved in an arbitration case he and his chums have launched against us. However I have absolutely no idea what he he was doing checking up on you. I don't know if you want to do anything about it, but I thought I should let you know anyway. ireneshusband (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I reviewed you. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 04:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
The word 'Naidu/Nayudu' in Telugu language is derved from the word 'Nayaka/Nayakudu' which means a leader or Chief. This was initially used as a title by medieval warriors in the state of Andhra Pradesh. These warriors belonged to various Telugu-speaking castes such as Kamma (caste), Velama, Telaga, Balija and Perika. These communities migrated to other parts of south India as part of army movements. The word 'Naidu' does not denote any particular caste or social group as being claimed by some Wiki users. I tried to reason with them but in vain. Kumarrao ( talk) 12:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. :D — neuro (talk) 18:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I just edited a comment for "Jossy Mansur" - I wasn't deleting the paragrpah 'which I wrote' but simply moving this from 'editorial' to publications. I should have noted this but as I am fairly new to this, I didn't know. Thanks for pointing this out.
RJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.88.66.145 ( talk) 18:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
...for the nice comment on my talk. Blame it on a custom keyboard I am working on for Huggle to make vandal fighting more efficient, it seems to be working efficiently, but it's annoying to not have some sort of splitter switch so I can switch between them... I have to plug in one after the other endlessly, gah. But yeah, thanks. :) — neuro (talk) 10:43, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Just to say when you reverted the page about Miriam Herrera to Category Jewish Poets, she is not Jewish, you would only put her in Jewish Poets if she was Practising Judaism. She does not Practise Judaism, because she has Jewish Blood it does not mean she practises Judaism. ( La convivencia ( talk) 14:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC))
Hello Belinrahs, after reading your explantion and reviewing your reverts, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Remember that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam, and misuse of the tool either by revert-warring with other editors or using it to revert edits you simply disagree with can lead to its removal. Good luck. Acalamari 17:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Should we go back and revert the anon user's massive edit history, most of which are the same general edits. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 31, 2008 @ 20:44
I don't get this whole business of people who prowl Wikipedia and arbitrarily determine which edits are constructive and which are unconstructive. I deleted the segment about "meager wages" because I felt like the message the group was trying to promote was one of solidarity rather than of despair. Inclusion of the term "Meager wages" seems as if the term "blue collar" is some kind of pejorative. I justified my edit on the talk page of the page that I edited. You people... I swear to god. 132.161.142.216 ( talk) 23:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Did you READ the Infinite-Energy Magazine article I refed??!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by William James Croft ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Okay. Seriously. Did you even read the summary? "Incorrect, see main article under history of sewing machine." Did you check the actual edit? I removed the false information and reference. SUCH VANDALISM. What the hell is with people these days? I'm really getting tired of this crap, it's making it not worthwhile to edit wikipedia. 24.175.72.249 ( talk) 14:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
you are not talked to edit talk pages its a violation of the wikipeida rules. secondly im was informing you and others that a particlular person keeps vandalising the actor's page by purposely editing piven's character to another. 67.167.180.64 ( talk) 14:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Belinrahs,
There should be two categories for Law Enforcement in Bhutan, the Royal Bhutan Police (RBP) and the Forest Guards (this page does not exist yet but I will create it by tomorrow) therefore I thought the RBP information should be reverted to its original page, and two links be present in the Law Enforcement in Bhutan page. No intention of vandalism.
Tangpa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tangpa ( talk • contribs) 01:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
how was that not constructive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.1.83.181 ( talk) 21:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You have previously expressed an interest in undergoing the Admin coaching program. We're currently engaged in a program reset to help things move more smoothly in the future. If you are still interested in the program, please go to Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching and re-list yourself under Current requests, deleting your entry from Older requests. Also, double-check to make sure coaching is right for you at the Coachee checklist; WP:Adoption or WP:Editor review may be more appropriate depending on your situation and aspirations. We should get back to you within a day or so, once a coaching relationship has been identified. Thank you. MBisanz talk 07:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I am pleased to announce that you have been paired with User:bibliomaniac15 as an admin coachee. You now have two important tasks to complete:
Given the limited coaching resources of the Admin Coaching project, if you plan to take a Wikibreak of more than 30 days, please notify your coach or myself so that we will know not to tag you as retired and give your spot to another user. Remember that adminship is not a big deal and that it may take multiple RfAs before one becomes a sysop, even for a highly qualified, coached, editor. Also, remember that while admin coaching will help you prepare for the mop, there is no guarantee that completing this program will ensure passage of an RfA.
Congratulations again, and happy editing. MBisanz talk 20:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
hi, this article was intended as a test article. i didn't realise i wasn't using the sandbox platform. can you move the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spectrumps ( talk • contribs) 14:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Well the relevant policy to quote is "The tag exists to give you some extra time; the page may still be deleted if it meets the speedy deletion criteria." at Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Speedy_deletion. Hangon means the requestor needs a couple minutes to fix whatever the problem is. But sometimes it can't be fixed. Like a copyvio can't be fixed just by adding the source link and Spam can't be fixed by adding more spam. And sometimes hangon is abused by people who put nonsense on the page and then contest it. As a new admin, I tend to jump over articles is hangon tags and leave them to more experienced admins. But I do know that the general rule is that even if its contested, it will eventually be speedied if it still violates one of the CSD rules. Hope that helps. MBisanz talk 19:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Dear Belinrahs,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! Unfortunately, your application has been declined because it seems that you don't have at least 500 edits. When you fulfill this requirement, feel free to re-apply.
AGK § 19:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~
Haemo recently made a checkuser request on a number of editors including you. This was completely illegal because he provided no evidence or plausible justification for it. Unfortunately the request was granted.
Most of those he checked up on, including me, are involved in an arbitration case he and his chums have launched against us. However I have absolutely no idea what he he was doing checking up on you. I don't know if you want to do anything about it, but I thought I should let you know anyway. ireneshusband (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I reviewed you. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 04:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
The word 'Naidu/Nayudu' in Telugu language is derved from the word 'Nayaka/Nayakudu' which means a leader or Chief. This was initially used as a title by medieval warriors in the state of Andhra Pradesh. These warriors belonged to various Telugu-speaking castes such as Kamma (caste), Velama, Telaga, Balija and Perika. These communities migrated to other parts of south India as part of army movements. The word 'Naidu' does not denote any particular caste or social group as being claimed by some Wiki users. I tried to reason with them but in vain. Kumarrao ( talk) 12:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. :D — neuro (talk) 18:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I just edited a comment for "Jossy Mansur" - I wasn't deleting the paragrpah 'which I wrote' but simply moving this from 'editorial' to publications. I should have noted this but as I am fairly new to this, I didn't know. Thanks for pointing this out.
RJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.88.66.145 ( talk) 18:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
...for the nice comment on my talk. Blame it on a custom keyboard I am working on for Huggle to make vandal fighting more efficient, it seems to be working efficiently, but it's annoying to not have some sort of splitter switch so I can switch between them... I have to plug in one after the other endlessly, gah. But yeah, thanks. :) — neuro (talk) 10:43, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Just to say when you reverted the page about Miriam Herrera to Category Jewish Poets, she is not Jewish, you would only put her in Jewish Poets if she was Practising Judaism. She does not Practise Judaism, because she has Jewish Blood it does not mean she practises Judaism. ( La convivencia ( talk) 14:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC))
Hello Belinrahs, after reading your explantion and reviewing your reverts, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Remember that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam, and misuse of the tool either by revert-warring with other editors or using it to revert edits you simply disagree with can lead to its removal. Good luck. Acalamari 17:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Should we go back and revert the anon user's massive edit history, most of which are the same general edits. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 31, 2008 @ 20:44
I don't get this whole business of people who prowl Wikipedia and arbitrarily determine which edits are constructive and which are unconstructive. I deleted the segment about "meager wages" because I felt like the message the group was trying to promote was one of solidarity rather than of despair. Inclusion of the term "Meager wages" seems as if the term "blue collar" is some kind of pejorative. I justified my edit on the talk page of the page that I edited. You people... I swear to god. 132.161.142.216 ( talk) 23:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Did you READ the Infinite-Energy Magazine article I refed??!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by William James Croft ( talk • contribs) 03:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Okay. Seriously. Did you even read the summary? "Incorrect, see main article under history of sewing machine." Did you check the actual edit? I removed the false information and reference. SUCH VANDALISM. What the hell is with people these days? I'm really getting tired of this crap, it's making it not worthwhile to edit wikipedia. 24.175.72.249 ( talk) 14:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
you are not talked to edit talk pages its a violation of the wikipeida rules. secondly im was informing you and others that a particlular person keeps vandalising the actor's page by purposely editing piven's character to another. 67.167.180.64 ( talk) 14:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Belinrahs,
There should be two categories for Law Enforcement in Bhutan, the Royal Bhutan Police (RBP) and the Forest Guards (this page does not exist yet but I will create it by tomorrow) therefore I thought the RBP information should be reverted to its original page, and two links be present in the Law Enforcement in Bhutan page. No intention of vandalism.
Tangpa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tangpa ( talk • contribs) 01:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
how was that not constructive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.1.83.181 ( talk) 21:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |