Hello, I'm
ToBeFree. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Happy Birthday— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
03:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Happy Birthday. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Happy Birthday. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Emwago! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the
Poise article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the
sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
M.Bitton (
talk)
00:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Emwago. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Happy Birthday David A. Goodman.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:16, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ToBeFree. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Happy Birthday— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
~ ToBeFree (
talk)
03:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Happy Birthday. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Happy Birthday. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 03:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Emwago! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the
Poise article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the
sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
M.Bitton (
talk)
00:07, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Emwago. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Happy Birthday David A. Goodman.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:16, 15 June 2019 (UTC)