This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
see and comment at chat - /info/en/?search=Talk:Steve_Bannon#rubbish_photo
Govindaharihari ( talk) 16:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
You forgot to sign your words at Spicer. SPECIFICO talk 03:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Abdul-Muttalib has been completed. It required only very minor changes in my opinion.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 13:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi ! Thanks for writing ! I am new to editing in Wikipedia so I am unaware of many things. I have read several posts on Tumblr talking about the correct death date of the late Sheikh Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum & precisely they were saying there was a mixup in the community between his real death date & his burial date so I felt it had to be cleared up & tried to do so. I did not know about these requirements you have told me. I will try to do my best to find these sources & post them. I do not know how but I will learn. Wow can you believe I dreamed this week about this? I dreamed on my sleep "someone" was checking my edits on wikipedia & Was going to contact me about it. Amazing ! I recently visited Dubai for 10 days because I wanted to know more about the life & culture of UAE so I got immersed into knowing all about its Royal Family. That is why I get into being an editor of wikipedia. Thanks a Lot ! - glad to knowing you! I am Sol from Puerto Rico. Macarrero ( talk) 14:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Sure ! I am doing some work. On lunch break now. It is 1:48 pm here. I will send them after I return home from work at 5:30 pm. Macarrero ( talk) 17:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi again ! The blog where I read about it is named : crown-prince-fazza-of-dubai . I do not know how to send you this link as I am also new to Tumblr. I took snaps of the Two mentions of the correct death date of the Sheikh Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum but I cannot send photos format here. You have to scroll down all the way on the blog of crown-prince-fazza-of-dubai until you reach the posts before Sept 20, 2016. There you will find the 2 posts I am referring to. Macarrero ( talk) 00:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
https://imgur.com/gallery/2BYXK Macarrero ( talk) 12:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Emir of Wikipedia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Abdul Rahman Hassan Azzam at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Mini apolis 20:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Emir of Wikipedia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Al-Waleed bin Talal at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Mini apolis 20:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you for welcoming me :) Matt11235 ( talk) 12:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I saw you reverted the claim regarding the first tie-breaking cabinet confirmation. You may want to review my fellow admin, Neutrality's, notes at Talk:Mike Pence#Tie-breaking vote... and then reassess whether the edit should stand. If you have any questions, just give me a {{ ping}}! — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
First you blamed me for removing content without explanation. So I added it back and you then accused me of "edit warring". You have now done what you said I shouldn't do - removed content without explanation. If you continue to violate WP:TPO the one who will end up being blocked is you. 78.145.17.138 ( talk) 11:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Emir of Wikipedia,
You changed the infobox of the article “Emirate of Nejd”. You changed the religion from “Sunni Islam” to “Wahhabi Islam”. May I ask you do you have a reliable source that “Wahhabi Islam” was the official religion in the “Emirate of Nejd”?
I would be happy if you reply.
Best regards,
Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.34.242.63 ( talk) 17:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
References
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Ad Orientem ( talk) 14:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
The pages contain members of Al Saud dynasty or family. The grandsons is sorted by their birthdate. Prince Faisal bin Thamir bin Abdulaziz Al Saud's father Thamir bin Abdulaziz Al Saud has died in 1958 or 1959. Thats why Faisal bin Thamir cannot be born after 1960. Thats why I placed it under born 1960 and above born 1962.
Thanks, Shahriar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.200.10.98 ( talk) 14:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Your recent edit on Jared Kushner appears to violate WP:1RR discretionary sanctions in that you have restored material whose addition was challenged by reversion. Additions to the article challenged by reversion may not be reinserted to an article subject to 1RR without talk page consensus. Please review your edit and if you believe it may violate 1RR or are unsure it is suggested that you self revert. Thank you. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 14:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
You recently removed my edit on Betsy Devos section. I cited a credible neutral source, but I will try to add more of her past experiences that make her qualified for the position. Do you think that would make it a better edit? I want to try and provide as much content as possible to users, and I think that her controversies are necessary for users to have as complete of a picture as possible, so I'm hoping that they can be put back in (albeit with a section talking about her positives as well). If you could re-implement it, I would appreciate it and I can add to it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick.aus96 ( talk • contribs) 15:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
must not reinstate any challenged (via reversion) edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article, as per the "post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people" sanctions. The source you cited was credible and neutral, but you just stuck it at the end of a paragraph you wrote where it was not supporting what you said. There is no need to add experiences that make her qualified for the position if they do not exist, but you could help keep the page up to date and write she actually does in her role. If you are not sure if you can make the best edits then please ask for help, do not just test the waters on biographies of living people. Thanks for trying provide as much content as possible to users, this is an encyclopaedia so do not add trivia. Her controversies should be included if notable and covered by the reliable sources, but having a specific section is not needed if it can fit into other sections chronologically. A section titled "Scandal" with no reliable sources mentioning the term is not neutral. A complete picture is good, however if no positives are present then their is nothing to mention. I will not re-implement it sadly, but I think you will be grateful that I taught you this instead of you just getting blocked. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 15:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Badlanders (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badlanders (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 18:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Emir of Wikipdia, thank you very much for your helpful replay! Yes, I'm fairly new and would like to get more familier with the tools so I picked some articles to develop based on self interest and knowledge, my main focus is on Syrian women and Arab personality in Wikipedia English, if you have any other advice to me I will be more than happy to receive. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by HanadiAslan ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Emir of Wikipedia,
I noticed that you reverted the image I added to this article /info/en/?search=Sireen_Hamsho may I ask you for the reason? I took the picture from the person's offical page, should I not?
Can you also please advise how to correct the spelling of the title name as there is no evidence for such spelling provided.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by HanadiAslan ( talk • contribs) 16:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
After about a decade, I've finally decided to go "registered" with my edits, as opposed to just an IP address. And only the second time I get an edit reverted - I'll need to fix that!
Factually... ( talk) 21:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Emir of Wikipedia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Abdul-Rahman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Mini apolis 22:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Kumayl ibn Ziyad has been completed.
I spent quite a bit of time trying to make the layout easier to read. You will see that I broke up the text in the Du'a sections into sentences - again for ease of reading. I hope this is acceptable to you.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 20:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Power Rangers (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent message.
I respect the work you've done on Wikipedia elsewhere, and hope that my differing view will be regarded as academic rather than personal.
Regarding your impartiality question, I think you will find there is no need for concern. My edits here aimed at two things: redundancy and potentially discriminatory information.
To the first point, the information you've inserted into the text box is already spelled out and cited quite clearly in the opening paragraph of the page, making your additions unnecessary and redundant. The addendum of (disputed) in both cases you've used it carries connotations of conflict which I don't know that you intend, and will doubtless lead to mistaken inference on the part of readers.
As to the second point, inserting age-identifying information into the biography of a living person, especially one who currently works in the entertainment business, is troublesome. Age discrimination and ageism (particularly in Hollywood) being endemic, the state of California has enacted legislation forbidding exactly this sort of age-identifying information online. This is not without reason, as it directly costs performers the opportunity for work - a form of discrimination in hiring that Wikipedia (perhaps unwittingly) implicitly endorses whenever it publishes this sort of information about living actors. Additionally, dates of birth are a key component in identity theft, which this type of publicly-posted information will only make easier for those of dubious intent.
I would therefore ask, with all the deference that is due to you and your judgment, that you reconsider and revert your edits to the page.
Thank you,
Blackehart ( talk) 10:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Emir of Wikipedia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Abdullah bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! – Corinne ( talk) 01:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hiya. It's not the biggest deal in the world, but MBR is ruler of Dubai (in Arabic, 'hakem'). None of the UAE's rulers style themselves as emirs - in all official communications (including the Dubai government website cited in the sentence) they are styled rulers. His own official biography, used in his books, styles him ruler of Dubai. If the British press decide to get it wrong (which they do with bone-crushing regularity), the official UAE record surely stands as paramount? Quite apart from that (and risking a charge of OR!) in 24 years' living and working in the UAE I have never, ever heard the word emir used once in relation to any of the ruling families in either present or past usage. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tourist attractions in Dubai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's World. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Emir of Wikipedia. I would suggest that you undo your recent change to a 3RR archive file. You said 'No conclusion reached.' That's not a reason to remove a post from the archive. If the person causes trouble in the future, people can find that they have been previously reported. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 02:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Emir of Wikipedia, I wanted to tell you why I had removed her version of the lesson from Surah Ibrahim, it was because the person who said it was not an islamic scholar and gave an inaccurate interpretation. It was a personal thing with god, meaning you can't hide anything god, it doesn't mean it is how you deal with other people according to their intentions. Hope this clears it up. I am very experienced in the Quran and use Islamic sources such as Ibn Kathir, a very famous scholar, to intrepret the Quran. If you want, you can follow up on the page in a couple days, I will add the correct interpretation. I had forgotten to do it for a while. AbdullahwaMuhsin ( talk) 15:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Saudi Arabia. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ad Orientem ( talk) 19:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
I’m fine with (temporarily) withholding identifying Kushner as a Democrat on the Senior Adviser list, but I’m not OK with idenifying him as an independent when there is little to no evidence that supports that claim.-- Sunshineisles2 ( talk) 19:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tsang (surname) (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Tsang (surname) (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk) 01:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of people from Idaho. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. John from Idegon ( talk) 20:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
You may see from Wikipedia:External links. You could not add social links as external links. You may read it carefully
Links normally to be avoided
Social networking sites (such as Myspace, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or email lists. Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities who are individuals always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)
.-- Egeymi ( talk) 14:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject. The Instagram account is the verified account of the person who the article is about. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 14:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Social networking sites (such as Myspace, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or email lists.This means that we can use social media, unless I am reading it wrong. I a really doubt I am reading it wrong as one of the most popular articles, Donald Trump, includes includes social media in the EL. It is possible that I am wrong, but that would be a major oversight on such a popular article. If you accept my line of reasoning then please self-revert. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 15:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
You are most assuredly reading it wrong. That means that you can use a (singular) social media link if an individual is using a social media page as their ONLY official website. If they have an actual website, do not add social media links. Also be advised that WP:EL is a guideline. Actual article content is ruled by consensus. If there is a really good reason, guidelines can be overridden with consensus. Perhaps that's why twitter is on Trump. There is certainly plenty of reason to have Trump's twitter listed as every third story about him involves his blathering on twitter. John from Idegon ( talk) 15:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and fair enough about
this edit, if you say so. The editor who added the category has been going round adding a variety of completely inappropriate descent categories, and this looked like just one more. What caused the problem is that there's nothing in the article to indicate the subject's ethnicity or descent, whether sourced (as required by
WP:CATEGRS) or even unsourced. The MoS says, at
WP:CATEGRS#General bullet point 4: As to the inclusion of people in a category related to ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality, or disability, please remember that inclusion must be based on reliable sources.
It'd really help, if you think the category is important/relevant enough to warrant inclusion, if you'd add a reliable published source to the article that confirms the subject's Cypriot ancestry. Thanks,
Struway2 (
talk)
15:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Not to disparage your tagging efforts, but might I suggest that you solve a few more of these rather than just tagging them with "disambiguation needed"? In many cases (two random recent samples: lens in Microscope, Komodo in Komodo dragon) it is entirely clear which meaning is intended. The balance of probability is that tagged disambs are just going to remain like that for a long time... -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 10:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi dear Mr. Emir
there is a page of Prince Abdullah bin saad if you could link it to the english one... created by arabic
: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/عبد_الله_بن_سعد_بن_عبد_العزيز_آل_سعود
for more references, I will put more links from saudi news paper
Thank you so much sir
Just want to confirm whether or not you still want the copyedit to go ahead. -- Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 12:36, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Would you mind telling us your precise opinion regarding the disputed "Islamic fundamentalism"? You may do that by responding to this edit of mine. Thanks. -- Mhhossein talk 14:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Alternative facts does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Also, you removed information that is contextually important to understanding the subject. If you disagree, I would be happy to discuss it with you on the article talk page. - Mr X 22:11, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey Emir of Wikipedia. I received your message but I've never heard of " Sammy2220 ( talk · contribs)" so I'm unsure of what you're talking about. This is my only account and I don't coordinate with 3rd parties.
Editor22022 ( talk) 11:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
The history of the article makes it quite clear that the content removal was both recent and challenged. I have reverted you, restoring the status quo of the article, as you offered absolutely no explanation for the removal of content. You need to make your case for removing that section of established content on talk. Thanks. Murph9000 ( talk) 18:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
discuss on talkpage before reinserting. I am not making a case for removing a section of established content, but rather reverting the material that was under dispute between Trendmeister and yourself. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 19:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Emir, thanks for the advice, i will do as you say next time when i'm removing or editing contents from pages. Unknown 0987 ( talk) 14:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, why did you undo my edit here? The section I deleted consists mostly of a quote by Taleb about himself, thus doesn't belong into a section on outsiders' praise or criticism. It is generally hard to justify why it would belong to Wikipedia at all (as opposed to Wikiquote), let alone in this unreflected and uncritical way ("gave a memorable commencement"- said who?). It violates the principle of a NPOV and should be deleted, and I would like to ask you to do so again please. -- SEM ( talk) 12:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC) PS: Oh, I just realised that I wasn't logged in when I edited. Apologies.
Template:Infobox royalty/embed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 11:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Power Rangers has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:15, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear Emir of Wikipedia. One more time you show the Wikipedia community how intellectual you are, disturbing and threatening editors. You show your obsession to seek a mistake on my edits, in order to block me from editing. But you neglect and ignore truth and threaten me for what I have not done. I recommend you to think and control twice, when you want to threaten an editor for "copyright vandalism" and plagiatism. There are more editors than myself, who have inserted more information in the side than myself. I would be grateful when you look what edits I have done, so that you may see how blind you are to accuse myself, doing an act I have not done. My edits are all substantiated by source disclosures as it has to be in an intellectual scientific edit. I have not inserted the information about Ahmed Amiruddin. Therefore it would be more just, when you take the true editors into account. You are truly a shame for the Wikipedia community, since you are expurging valuable information for your own dictatorical sense of hedonistical vengeance. As I see many people are lamenting on your edits. I would be grateful, when you take our criticism into account. Sincerely Imamzadeh1901
I declined your speedy deletion nomination of Oneplus 5 as the rationale did not suggest a speedy deletion criterion listed in the criteria for speedy deletion. I didn't nominate for deletion myself as it didn't seem an obvious case of WP:CRYSTAL given that OnePlus confirmed that the phone will exist with certain specifications; feel free to nominate it for deletion discussion yourself after conducting a check for ways to improve the article. Appable ( talk | contributions) 17:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
These are a little outside the had grenade category; here's a modern version. (Ignore the sales language.) Anmccaff ( talk) 17:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
[1] - The editor's right. — Tyler Durden (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
see and comment at chat - /info/en/?search=Talk:Steve_Bannon#rubbish_photo
Govindaharihari ( talk) 16:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
You forgot to sign your words at Spicer. SPECIFICO talk 03:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Abdul-Muttalib has been completed. It required only very minor changes in my opinion.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 13:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi ! Thanks for writing ! I am new to editing in Wikipedia so I am unaware of many things. I have read several posts on Tumblr talking about the correct death date of the late Sheikh Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum & precisely they were saying there was a mixup in the community between his real death date & his burial date so I felt it had to be cleared up & tried to do so. I did not know about these requirements you have told me. I will try to do my best to find these sources & post them. I do not know how but I will learn. Wow can you believe I dreamed this week about this? I dreamed on my sleep "someone" was checking my edits on wikipedia & Was going to contact me about it. Amazing ! I recently visited Dubai for 10 days because I wanted to know more about the life & culture of UAE so I got immersed into knowing all about its Royal Family. That is why I get into being an editor of wikipedia. Thanks a Lot ! - glad to knowing you! I am Sol from Puerto Rico. Macarrero ( talk) 14:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Sure ! I am doing some work. On lunch break now. It is 1:48 pm here. I will send them after I return home from work at 5:30 pm. Macarrero ( talk) 17:51, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi again ! The blog where I read about it is named : crown-prince-fazza-of-dubai . I do not know how to send you this link as I am also new to Tumblr. I took snaps of the Two mentions of the correct death date of the Sheikh Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum but I cannot send photos format here. You have to scroll down all the way on the blog of crown-prince-fazza-of-dubai until you reach the posts before Sept 20, 2016. There you will find the 2 posts I am referring to. Macarrero ( talk) 00:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
https://imgur.com/gallery/2BYXK Macarrero ( talk) 12:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Emir of Wikipedia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Abdul Rahman Hassan Azzam at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Mini apolis 20:39, 11 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Emir of Wikipedia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Al-Waleed bin Talal at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Mini apolis 20:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you for welcoming me :) Matt11235 ( talk) 12:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I saw you reverted the claim regarding the first tie-breaking cabinet confirmation. You may want to review my fellow admin, Neutrality's, notes at Talk:Mike Pence#Tie-breaking vote... and then reassess whether the edit should stand. If you have any questions, just give me a {{ ping}}! — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
First you blamed me for removing content without explanation. So I added it back and you then accused me of "edit warring". You have now done what you said I shouldn't do - removed content without explanation. If you continue to violate WP:TPO the one who will end up being blocked is you. 78.145.17.138 ( talk) 11:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Emir of Wikipedia,
You changed the infobox of the article “Emirate of Nejd”. You changed the religion from “Sunni Islam” to “Wahhabi Islam”. May I ask you do you have a reliable source that “Wahhabi Islam” was the official religion in the “Emirate of Nejd”?
I would be happy if you reply.
Best regards,
Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.34.242.63 ( talk) 17:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
References
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Ad Orientem ( talk) 14:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
The pages contain members of Al Saud dynasty or family. The grandsons is sorted by their birthdate. Prince Faisal bin Thamir bin Abdulaziz Al Saud's father Thamir bin Abdulaziz Al Saud has died in 1958 or 1959. Thats why Faisal bin Thamir cannot be born after 1960. Thats why I placed it under born 1960 and above born 1962.
Thanks, Shahriar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.200.10.98 ( talk) 14:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Your recent edit on Jared Kushner appears to violate WP:1RR discretionary sanctions in that you have restored material whose addition was challenged by reversion. Additions to the article challenged by reversion may not be reinserted to an article subject to 1RR without talk page consensus. Please review your edit and if you believe it may violate 1RR or are unsure it is suggested that you self revert. Thank you. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 14:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
You recently removed my edit on Betsy Devos section. I cited a credible neutral source, but I will try to add more of her past experiences that make her qualified for the position. Do you think that would make it a better edit? I want to try and provide as much content as possible to users, and I think that her controversies are necessary for users to have as complete of a picture as possible, so I'm hoping that they can be put back in (albeit with a section talking about her positives as well). If you could re-implement it, I would appreciate it and I can add to it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick.aus96 ( talk • contribs) 15:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
must not reinstate any challenged (via reversion) edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article, as per the "post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people" sanctions. The source you cited was credible and neutral, but you just stuck it at the end of a paragraph you wrote where it was not supporting what you said. There is no need to add experiences that make her qualified for the position if they do not exist, but you could help keep the page up to date and write she actually does in her role. If you are not sure if you can make the best edits then please ask for help, do not just test the waters on biographies of living people. Thanks for trying provide as much content as possible to users, this is an encyclopaedia so do not add trivia. Her controversies should be included if notable and covered by the reliable sources, but having a specific section is not needed if it can fit into other sections chronologically. A section titled "Scandal" with no reliable sources mentioning the term is not neutral. A complete picture is good, however if no positives are present then their is nothing to mention. I will not re-implement it sadly, but I think you will be grateful that I taught you this instead of you just getting blocked. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 15:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Badlanders (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badlanders (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 18:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Emir of Wikipdia, thank you very much for your helpful replay! Yes, I'm fairly new and would like to get more familier with the tools so I picked some articles to develop based on self interest and knowledge, my main focus is on Syrian women and Arab personality in Wikipedia English, if you have any other advice to me I will be more than happy to receive. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by HanadiAslan ( talk • contribs) 19:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Emir of Wikipedia,
I noticed that you reverted the image I added to this article /info/en/?search=Sireen_Hamsho may I ask you for the reason? I took the picture from the person's offical page, should I not?
Can you also please advise how to correct the spelling of the title name as there is no evidence for such spelling provided.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by HanadiAslan ( talk • contribs) 16:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
After about a decade, I've finally decided to go "registered" with my edits, as opposed to just an IP address. And only the second time I get an edit reverted - I'll need to fix that!
Factually... ( talk) 21:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Emir of Wikipedia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Abdul-Rahman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Mini apolis 22:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Kumayl ibn Ziyad has been completed.
I spent quite a bit of time trying to make the layout easier to read. You will see that I broke up the text in the Du'a sections into sentences - again for ease of reading. I hope this is acceptable to you.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 20:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Power Rangers (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent message.
I respect the work you've done on Wikipedia elsewhere, and hope that my differing view will be regarded as academic rather than personal.
Regarding your impartiality question, I think you will find there is no need for concern. My edits here aimed at two things: redundancy and potentially discriminatory information.
To the first point, the information you've inserted into the text box is already spelled out and cited quite clearly in the opening paragraph of the page, making your additions unnecessary and redundant. The addendum of (disputed) in both cases you've used it carries connotations of conflict which I don't know that you intend, and will doubtless lead to mistaken inference on the part of readers.
As to the second point, inserting age-identifying information into the biography of a living person, especially one who currently works in the entertainment business, is troublesome. Age discrimination and ageism (particularly in Hollywood) being endemic, the state of California has enacted legislation forbidding exactly this sort of age-identifying information online. This is not without reason, as it directly costs performers the opportunity for work - a form of discrimination in hiring that Wikipedia (perhaps unwittingly) implicitly endorses whenever it publishes this sort of information about living actors. Additionally, dates of birth are a key component in identity theft, which this type of publicly-posted information will only make easier for those of dubious intent.
I would therefore ask, with all the deference that is due to you and your judgment, that you reconsider and revert your edits to the page.
Thank you,
Blackehart ( talk) 10:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Emir of Wikipedia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Abdullah bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! – Corinne ( talk) 01:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC) |
Hiya. It's not the biggest deal in the world, but MBR is ruler of Dubai (in Arabic, 'hakem'). None of the UAE's rulers style themselves as emirs - in all official communications (including the Dubai government website cited in the sentence) they are styled rulers. His own official biography, used in his books, styles him ruler of Dubai. If the British press decide to get it wrong (which they do with bone-crushing regularity), the official UAE record surely stands as paramount? Quite apart from that (and risking a charge of OR!) in 24 years' living and working in the UAE I have never, ever heard the word emir used once in relation to any of the ruling families in either present or past usage. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:57, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of tourist attractions in Dubai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's World. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Emir of Wikipedia. I would suggest that you undo your recent change to a 3RR archive file. You said 'No conclusion reached.' That's not a reason to remove a post from the archive. If the person causes trouble in the future, people can find that they have been previously reported. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 02:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Emir of Wikipedia, I wanted to tell you why I had removed her version of the lesson from Surah Ibrahim, it was because the person who said it was not an islamic scholar and gave an inaccurate interpretation. It was a personal thing with god, meaning you can't hide anything god, it doesn't mean it is how you deal with other people according to their intentions. Hope this clears it up. I am very experienced in the Quran and use Islamic sources such as Ibn Kathir, a very famous scholar, to intrepret the Quran. If you want, you can follow up on the page in a couple days, I will add the correct interpretation. I had forgotten to do it for a while. AbdullahwaMuhsin ( talk) 15:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Saudi Arabia. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ad Orientem ( talk) 19:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
I’m fine with (temporarily) withholding identifying Kushner as a Democrat on the Senior Adviser list, but I’m not OK with idenifying him as an independent when there is little to no evidence that supports that claim.-- Sunshineisles2 ( talk) 19:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tsang (surname) (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Tsang (surname) (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk) 01:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of people from Idaho. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. John from Idegon ( talk) 20:27, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
You may see from Wikipedia:External links. You could not add social links as external links. You may read it carefully
Links normally to be avoided
Social networking sites (such as Myspace, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or email lists. Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities who are individuals always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)
.-- Egeymi ( talk) 14:56, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject. The Instagram account is the verified account of the person who the article is about. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 14:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Social networking sites (such as Myspace, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or email lists.This means that we can use social media, unless I am reading it wrong. I a really doubt I am reading it wrong as one of the most popular articles, Donald Trump, includes includes social media in the EL. It is possible that I am wrong, but that would be a major oversight on such a popular article. If you accept my line of reasoning then please self-revert. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 15:05, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
You are most assuredly reading it wrong. That means that you can use a (singular) social media link if an individual is using a social media page as their ONLY official website. If they have an actual website, do not add social media links. Also be advised that WP:EL is a guideline. Actual article content is ruled by consensus. If there is a really good reason, guidelines can be overridden with consensus. Perhaps that's why twitter is on Trump. There is certainly plenty of reason to have Trump's twitter listed as every third story about him involves his blathering on twitter. John from Idegon ( talk) 15:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and fair enough about
this edit, if you say so. The editor who added the category has been going round adding a variety of completely inappropriate descent categories, and this looked like just one more. What caused the problem is that there's nothing in the article to indicate the subject's ethnicity or descent, whether sourced (as required by
WP:CATEGRS) or even unsourced. The MoS says, at
WP:CATEGRS#General bullet point 4: As to the inclusion of people in a category related to ethnicity, gender, religion, sexuality, or disability, please remember that inclusion must be based on reliable sources.
It'd really help, if you think the category is important/relevant enough to warrant inclusion, if you'd add a reliable published source to the article that confirms the subject's Cypriot ancestry. Thanks,
Struway2 (
talk)
15:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Not to disparage your tagging efforts, but might I suggest that you solve a few more of these rather than just tagging them with "disambiguation needed"? In many cases (two random recent samples: lens in Microscope, Komodo in Komodo dragon) it is entirely clear which meaning is intended. The balance of probability is that tagged disambs are just going to remain like that for a long time... -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 10:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi dear Mr. Emir
there is a page of Prince Abdullah bin saad if you could link it to the english one... created by arabic
: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/عبد_الله_بن_سعد_بن_عبد_العزيز_آل_سعود
for more references, I will put more links from saudi news paper
Thank you so much sir
Just want to confirm whether or not you still want the copyedit to go ahead. -- Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 12:36, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Would you mind telling us your precise opinion regarding the disputed "Islamic fundamentalism"? You may do that by responding to this edit of mine. Thanks. -- Mhhossein talk 14:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Alternative facts does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Also, you removed information that is contextually important to understanding the subject. If you disagree, I would be happy to discuss it with you on the article talk page. - Mr X 22:11, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey Emir of Wikipedia. I received your message but I've never heard of " Sammy2220 ( talk · contribs)" so I'm unsure of what you're talking about. This is my only account and I don't coordinate with 3rd parties.
Editor22022 ( talk) 11:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
The history of the article makes it quite clear that the content removal was both recent and challenged. I have reverted you, restoring the status quo of the article, as you offered absolutely no explanation for the removal of content. You need to make your case for removing that section of established content on talk. Thanks. Murph9000 ( talk) 18:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
discuss on talkpage before reinserting. I am not making a case for removing a section of established content, but rather reverting the material that was under dispute between Trendmeister and yourself. Emir of Wikipedia ( talk) 19:31, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Emir, thanks for the advice, i will do as you say next time when i'm removing or editing contents from pages. Unknown 0987 ( talk) 14:34, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, why did you undo my edit here? The section I deleted consists mostly of a quote by Taleb about himself, thus doesn't belong into a section on outsiders' praise or criticism. It is generally hard to justify why it would belong to Wikipedia at all (as opposed to Wikiquote), let alone in this unreflected and uncritical way ("gave a memorable commencement"- said who?). It violates the principle of a NPOV and should be deleted, and I would like to ask you to do so again please. -- SEM ( talk) 12:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC) PS: Oh, I just realised that I wasn't logged in when I edited. Apologies.
Template:Infobox royalty/embed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 11:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Power Rangers has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:15, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear Emir of Wikipedia. One more time you show the Wikipedia community how intellectual you are, disturbing and threatening editors. You show your obsession to seek a mistake on my edits, in order to block me from editing. But you neglect and ignore truth and threaten me for what I have not done. I recommend you to think and control twice, when you want to threaten an editor for "copyright vandalism" and plagiatism. There are more editors than myself, who have inserted more information in the side than myself. I would be grateful when you look what edits I have done, so that you may see how blind you are to accuse myself, doing an act I have not done. My edits are all substantiated by source disclosures as it has to be in an intellectual scientific edit. I have not inserted the information about Ahmed Amiruddin. Therefore it would be more just, when you take the true editors into account. You are truly a shame for the Wikipedia community, since you are expurging valuable information for your own dictatorical sense of hedonistical vengeance. As I see many people are lamenting on your edits. I would be grateful, when you take our criticism into account. Sincerely Imamzadeh1901
I declined your speedy deletion nomination of Oneplus 5 as the rationale did not suggest a speedy deletion criterion listed in the criteria for speedy deletion. I didn't nominate for deletion myself as it didn't seem an obvious case of WP:CRYSTAL given that OnePlus confirmed that the phone will exist with certain specifications; feel free to nominate it for deletion discussion yourself after conducting a check for ways to improve the article. Appable ( talk | contributions) 17:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
These are a little outside the had grenade category; here's a modern version. (Ignore the sales language.) Anmccaff ( talk) 17:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
[1] - The editor's right. — Tyler Durden (talk) 14:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)