That's the place to answer the other user's concerns. Talk:Checkpoint Charlie Museum#Disputed edits and NPOV ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
IamNotU (
talk)
22:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Your addition to
Checkpoint Charlie Museum has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
IamNotU (
talk)
09:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Eintracht123, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
Checkpoint Charlie Museum have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please refer to WP:PARAPHRASE in particular. Thank you. IamNotU ( talk) 21:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Checkpoint Charlie Museum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Please discuss your concerns on the talk page, and see also
WP:EDITWAR. --
IamNotU (
talk)
15:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Checkpoint Charlie Museum shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 10:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Eintracht123. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
I'm not certain that a COI applies to you, but I'm concerned that many of your edits have problems with WP:NPOV and WP:ADVOCACY, and having a personal relationship with the subject is a common cause of that. You are not required to reveal your real-life identity, and I will not try to find it out. But if you do have a conflict of interest, you're obligated to follow the above rules. Please also see the talk page at talk:Checkpoint Charlie Museum where I've written a response to the concerns you wrote in your edit summary, thanks. -- IamNotU ( talk) 22:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! Can you please explain why the content you removed here is "defamation" as you described in the edit summary please? I don't understand, as you didn't explain it in-depth. Thank you. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
It is a) about the tone of your text and b) about the accuracy - haven't seen any disclosures of financial statements etc. - this is fake research and fake information you are providing to users. I urge you to desist from spreading fake information and fake news. Stay true to the facts. This is what wikipedia is all about.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)That's the place to answer the other user's concerns. Talk:Checkpoint Charlie Museum#Disputed edits and NPOV ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
15:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)That's the place to answer the other user's concerns. Talk:Checkpoint Charlie Museum#Disputed edits and NPOV ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
IamNotU (
talk)
22:04, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Your addition to
Checkpoint Charlie Museum has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
IamNotU (
talk)
09:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Eintracht123, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to
Checkpoint Charlie Museum have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Please refer to WP:PARAPHRASE in particular. Thank you. IamNotU ( talk) 21:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Checkpoint Charlie Museum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Please discuss your concerns on the talk page, and see also
WP:EDITWAR. --
IamNotU (
talk)
15:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Checkpoint Charlie Museum shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 10:55, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Eintracht123. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
I'm not certain that a COI applies to you, but I'm concerned that many of your edits have problems with WP:NPOV and WP:ADVOCACY, and having a personal relationship with the subject is a common cause of that. You are not required to reveal your real-life identity, and I will not try to find it out. But if you do have a conflict of interest, you're obligated to follow the above rules. Please also see the talk page at talk:Checkpoint Charlie Museum where I've written a response to the concerns you wrote in your edit summary, thanks. -- IamNotU ( talk) 22:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! Can you please explain why the content you removed here is "defamation" as you described in the edit summary please? I don't understand, as you didn't explain it in-depth. Thank you. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 22:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
It is a) about the tone of your text and b) about the accuracy - haven't seen any disclosures of financial statements etc. - this is fake research and fake information you are providing to users. I urge you to desist from spreading fake information and fake news. Stay true to the facts. This is what wikipedia is all about.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
01:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)That's the place to answer the other user's concerns. Talk:Checkpoint Charlie Museum#Disputed edits and NPOV ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 14:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
15:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)