This user may have left Wikipedia. EdoDodo has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — EdoDodo — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
|
This is an
archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page. If you cannot find the archive of the discussion you are looking for the archive index may help. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hello EdoDodo,
Just thought I'd give you a heads up that there are some dodobot requests - the one before mine looks to have been there for a month. Only just noticed.
Any chance you drop in there and comment. Cheers EdwardLane ( talk) 07:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Can your bot handle a list of 4,000 messages? Does it remove duplicate addresses? And are there currently any delays for bot runs? Thanks. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I will be filing a bot request for a message within the hour. tI's an important message from the WMF, and your prompt attention to it would be much appreciated. I have also notified Nascar. Thanks. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
The "request a message delivery" link at the bottom seems to be a bit vague, not just in the text that it shows for the link, but for the request page itself. Is it to request that it delivers messages to you, or is it for having it deliver a actual message to someone of your choosing? LikeLakers2 ( talk | Sign my guestbook!) 01:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
← You may have to test with a bigger distro list, it doesn't seem to double-message the first recipient. – xeno talk 16:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
( edit conflict)Also, to Edward Lane and the others on the waiting list for DodoBot, apologies for not running any DodoBot requests lately - I've been very busy in real life. I'll hopefully have time to run those next week (probably in the weekend). - EdoDodo talk 17:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Can you make another WP:CHICAGO tagging run.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 06:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
How does the bot handle fully-protected talk pages? I believe in the most recent delivery there was one such page but the bot did not give any kind of error message. – xeno talk 13:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, I just wanted to let you know that I haven't heard anything bad about the bot or any problems and I wanted to make sure you werent waiting on something for me. I've been so busy lately I wanted to make sure I didn't forget to do something. A couple things that might help, but not sure.
|NM-importance=
and its missing for the main tempalte importance (|importance=
) could the bot add low to the main template importance? In almost every case if the article is low importance to the supported project itll be low for the main project too.Thanks again for all the help. -- Kumioko ( talk) 14:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
|autoi=yes
in this case, you fine with that?Bot is replacing WikiProject Mexican-Americans tags now. I'll do the rest of the tasks (tags I previously missed, and auto assess) after this is done. - EdoDodo talk 14:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
|autoi=
to all projects so we should be good on this.I also just added another three WikiProject Washington, Wikipedia:WikiProject Seattle and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Washington/Eastern Washington task force. -- Kumioko ( talk) 14:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Greetings Edo. Here is the next group of projects that will be added to the WikiProject United States template in the next day or so. The = X designates what the project parameter flag is.
Just as in the case of Washington and teh Seattle and Eastern Washington task forces the Yellowstone task force goes with Wyoming and the Ohio townships task force goes with Ohio. If these are going to be a bigger problem though feel free to do the others first and come back to these when you have the time. There will probably be one more group after this one and that will be it. By the end of the month we will have identified all projects that want to be supported so anything after that will be 1 or 2 here and there. Please let me know if you haveany questions. -- Kumioko ( talk) 17:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, I am almost done with the gathering of US related projects and will have the final list in the next couple days. Its pretty large though just to warn you. I will separate the ones that are easy to process from the harder ones. -- Kumioko ( talk) 19:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm a bit surprised that the bot (Dodobot) has tagged Tithe maps as low importance and Estate maps as high importance. I would not have expected such a large disparity between the two. Presumably there is some rule, but I'm not sure what it is. Rjm at sleepers ( talk) 08:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Easily removed but your bot tagged Talk:2011 Sony Ericsson Open – Men's Singles with WP:WMNSPORT.... definitely NOT an article about women. :-) Fyunck(click) ( talk) 19:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey there sorry its been so long. Are you still available to help tag some pages with your bot. I noticed you hadn't been online much and wanted to make sure first before dropping a big list one here. -- Kumioko ( talk) 00:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Here is the start of the list. I'm not sure if you remember how we were doing it before but if not let me know. These are the easy ones and constitute about 36000 articles. I will add the next group shortly but they are a bit more complicated. Please let me know if you have any questions and if you don't mind drop me a note when you start the run. With so many of them I would like to spot check to make sure we don't accidentally do something we shouldn't. Thanks again for the help.
Around 40, 000 articles
About 2500 articles
That should be all of it except a couple cats and dogs. -- Kumioko ( talk) 19:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
The talk page of Minimum bounding rectangle was recently tagged by this bot as an article within the scope of WikiProject Maps, which is clearly incorrect since it's not about maps but about a kind of data structure. — Kri ( talk) 20:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
: That will almost certainly have been my fault - when sorting which categories to tag with that wikiproject took quite a while - and there were probably a few extra pages tagged in error (I tried to avoid doing that as much as possible) - and there a probably still a few map related articles that won't have been tagged as a result - sorry about that - it's almost certainly not a reflection on dodobot. So jsut remove the tag and away to go. I'll go have a look at that page and which category got it tagged - perhaps that means I need to untag a few other pages.
EdwardLane (
talk)
13:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, I just wanted to check back on the status of the request for the tagging run for WPUS. I noticed that most of the backlog of other requests had been cleared out and wanted to ask if there is anything you still need from me? -- Kumioko ( talk) 17:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
You upload on the Pisane map and may be interested in this. I have much more on this portolan. -- Portolanero ( talk) 17:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
I know you've been busy lately and thank you so much for the help in replacing the WikiProject templates before but I just wanted to let you know that I got a bot approved for this task now so you don't have to do it. Thanks again. -- Kumioko ( talk) 19:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that although most messages were delivered ( see contributions) some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (WPF1 Newsletter (December)). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 19:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC). Delivered here because delivering to User talk:Midgrid failed.
Greetings-
My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a graduate student at the University of Oregon, currently collecting data for my dissertation on Wikipedia editors who create and use bots and assisted editing tools, as well as editors involved in the initial and/or ongoing creation of bot policies on Wikipedia. As a member of BAG and an active member of the bot community, I would very much like to interview you for the project at a time and in a method that is most convenient for you (Gchat, another IM client, Skype, email, telephone, etc.). I am completely flexible and can work with your schedule. The interview will take approximately 30-45 minutes.
My dissertation project has been approved both by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Oregon, and by the Research Committee at the Wikimedia Foundation. You can find more information on the project on my meta page.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to hearing from you to set up a time to chat. Thank you very much.
Randall Livingstone, School of Journalism & Communication, University of Oregon
UOJComm ( talk) 00:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Would it be possible for the two bots, DodoBot and TedderBot, to work together or share some capabilities. From my understanding, DodoBot applies WP Project tags to articles in categories corresponding to a project, but does it only once, on demand. TedderBot finds new articles every day, but doesn't apply a WP Project tag to high scoring articles. It would be great if DodoBot could run on a schedule, say once a week, since many articles and categories show up in time. Also, it would be great if TedderBot could apply the WP Project tag to high scoring new articles, categories, templates etc, or at least feed the created list to DodoBot for tagging. Is this (at least partially) doable? Both of them are great bots BTW! Thanks -- Codrin.B ( talk) 22:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello EdoDodo: I recently made a request several days ago for the MessageDeliveryBot to send out a new newsletter to active members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron, but it hasn't been sent at this time. I was hoping you could look into this matter. The request ID number is 256. Please respond at my talk page (talkback, per your instructions above) at your convenience, and thanks. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that although most messages were delivered ( see contributions) some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (WPF1 Newsletter (January)). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 21:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC). Delivered here because delivering to User talk:Midgrid failed.
Greetings,
Today I sent a request for an automated message to be sent around using a bot. The confirmation was AwTn7Kfa. I'd like to cancel the request for now. I've tried to go in and edit the request but wasn't provided with an ID or password.
Has the message been sent out yet?
Thanks. -- Jaobar ( talk) 02:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello EdoDodo: I recently made a request several days ago for the MessageDeliveryBot to send out a new newsletter to active members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron, but it hasn't been sent at this time. I was hoping you could look into this matter. The request ID number is 256. Please respond at my talk page (talkback, per your instructions above) at your convenience, and thanks. Northamerica1000 (talk) 14:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello? Do you know how I can make a bot for another wiki? Randomfvideos ( talk) 02:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that although most messages were delivered ( see contributions) some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (WPF1 Newsletter (February)). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 15:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC). Delivered here because delivering to User talk:Midgrid failed.
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
02:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
If i submit an invite for next month's wikification drive can i be 100% sure it'll get delivered? Because last time it wasn't and so had to use AWB… and i'd need to know in advance if i'm going to do that. Thanks, benzband ( talk) 15:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings EdoDodo, I'm writing in regards to the MessengerDeliveryBot for which I have used in the past and also have a TUSC approval. A discussion took place on WikiProject Eurovision, in regards to reviving the project newsletter which will be sent out to project members on a monthly basis. However, it will take a long time to deliver the newsletter to person individually, and I was wondering if using the Messenger service would be an acceptable option? If so, would someone from the project need login access to be able to approve and send the newsletters out on-time, without having them in a queuing system which may delay things? I thank you for your time reading this, and for look forward to your response in due course. Regards, Wesley ☀ Mouse 17:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey, EdoDodo, Just a poke not sure if you're aware it seems WelcomerBot has not been operating. Thanks Mlpearc ( powwow) 20:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Sachs 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat ( talk) 03:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Sachs 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat ( talk) 03:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
He's not editing, at his web interface for filing requests is broken. -- Nathan2055 talk - contribs 14:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Dear EdoDodo, your EdoBot had no edits on it.wiki for last 12 months. If you have objections, please answer on my talk, otherwise your bot will be deflagged in 7 days. Best regards, -- Gnu marcoo 16:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. EdoDodo has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — EdoDodo — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
|
This is an
archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page. If you cannot find the archive of the discussion you are looking for the archive index may help. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Hello EdoDodo,
Just thought I'd give you a heads up that there are some dodobot requests - the one before mine looks to have been there for a month. Only just noticed.
Any chance you drop in there and comment. Cheers EdwardLane ( talk) 07:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Can your bot handle a list of 4,000 messages? Does it remove duplicate addresses? And are there currently any delays for bot runs? Thanks. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I will be filing a bot request for a message within the hour. tI's an important message from the WMF, and your prompt attention to it would be much appreciated. I have also notified Nascar. Thanks. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
The "request a message delivery" link at the bottom seems to be a bit vague, not just in the text that it shows for the link, but for the request page itself. Is it to request that it delivers messages to you, or is it for having it deliver a actual message to someone of your choosing? LikeLakers2 ( talk | Sign my guestbook!) 01:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
← You may have to test with a bigger distro list, it doesn't seem to double-message the first recipient. – xeno talk 16:44, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
( edit conflict)Also, to Edward Lane and the others on the waiting list for DodoBot, apologies for not running any DodoBot requests lately - I've been very busy in real life. I'll hopefully have time to run those next week (probably in the weekend). - EdoDodo talk 17:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Can you make another WP:CHICAGO tagging run.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 06:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
How does the bot handle fully-protected talk pages? I believe in the most recent delivery there was one such page but the bot did not give any kind of error message. – xeno talk 13:36, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, I just wanted to let you know that I haven't heard anything bad about the bot or any problems and I wanted to make sure you werent waiting on something for me. I've been so busy lately I wanted to make sure I didn't forget to do something. A couple things that might help, but not sure.
|NM-importance=
and its missing for the main tempalte importance (|importance=
) could the bot add low to the main template importance? In almost every case if the article is low importance to the supported project itll be low for the main project too.Thanks again for all the help. -- Kumioko ( talk) 14:45, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
|autoi=yes
in this case, you fine with that?Bot is replacing WikiProject Mexican-Americans tags now. I'll do the rest of the tasks (tags I previously missed, and auto assess) after this is done. - EdoDodo talk 14:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
|autoi=
to all projects so we should be good on this.I also just added another three WikiProject Washington, Wikipedia:WikiProject Seattle and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Washington/Eastern Washington task force. -- Kumioko ( talk) 14:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Greetings Edo. Here is the next group of projects that will be added to the WikiProject United States template in the next day or so. The = X designates what the project parameter flag is.
Just as in the case of Washington and teh Seattle and Eastern Washington task forces the Yellowstone task force goes with Wyoming and the Ohio townships task force goes with Ohio. If these are going to be a bigger problem though feel free to do the others first and come back to these when you have the time. There will probably be one more group after this one and that will be it. By the end of the month we will have identified all projects that want to be supported so anything after that will be 1 or 2 here and there. Please let me know if you haveany questions. -- Kumioko ( talk) 17:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, I am almost done with the gathering of US related projects and will have the final list in the next couple days. Its pretty large though just to warn you. I will separate the ones that are easy to process from the harder ones. -- Kumioko ( talk) 19:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm a bit surprised that the bot (Dodobot) has tagged Tithe maps as low importance and Estate maps as high importance. I would not have expected such a large disparity between the two. Presumably there is some rule, but I'm not sure what it is. Rjm at sleepers ( talk) 08:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Easily removed but your bot tagged Talk:2011 Sony Ericsson Open – Men's Singles with WP:WMNSPORT.... definitely NOT an article about women. :-) Fyunck(click) ( talk) 19:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey there sorry its been so long. Are you still available to help tag some pages with your bot. I noticed you hadn't been online much and wanted to make sure first before dropping a big list one here. -- Kumioko ( talk) 00:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Here is the start of the list. I'm not sure if you remember how we were doing it before but if not let me know. These are the easy ones and constitute about 36000 articles. I will add the next group shortly but they are a bit more complicated. Please let me know if you have any questions and if you don't mind drop me a note when you start the run. With so many of them I would like to spot check to make sure we don't accidentally do something we shouldn't. Thanks again for the help.
Around 40, 000 articles
About 2500 articles
That should be all of it except a couple cats and dogs. -- Kumioko ( talk) 19:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
The talk page of Minimum bounding rectangle was recently tagged by this bot as an article within the scope of WikiProject Maps, which is clearly incorrect since it's not about maps but about a kind of data structure. — Kri ( talk) 20:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
: That will almost certainly have been my fault - when sorting which categories to tag with that wikiproject took quite a while - and there were probably a few extra pages tagged in error (I tried to avoid doing that as much as possible) - and there a probably still a few map related articles that won't have been tagged as a result - sorry about that - it's almost certainly not a reflection on dodobot. So jsut remove the tag and away to go. I'll go have a look at that page and which category got it tagged - perhaps that means I need to untag a few other pages.
EdwardLane (
talk)
13:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Greetings, I just wanted to check back on the status of the request for the tagging run for WPUS. I noticed that most of the backlog of other requests had been cleared out and wanted to ask if there is anything you still need from me? -- Kumioko ( talk) 17:40, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
You upload on the Pisane map and may be interested in this. I have much more on this portolan. -- Portolanero ( talk) 17:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
I know you've been busy lately and thank you so much for the help in replacing the WikiProject templates before but I just wanted to let you know that I got a bot approved for this task now so you don't have to do it. Thanks again. -- Kumioko ( talk) 19:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that although most messages were delivered ( see contributions) some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (WPF1 Newsletter (December)). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 19:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC). Delivered here because delivering to User talk:Midgrid failed.
Greetings-
My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a graduate student at the University of Oregon, currently collecting data for my dissertation on Wikipedia editors who create and use bots and assisted editing tools, as well as editors involved in the initial and/or ongoing creation of bot policies on Wikipedia. As a member of BAG and an active member of the bot community, I would very much like to interview you for the project at a time and in a method that is most convenient for you (Gchat, another IM client, Skype, email, telephone, etc.). I am completely flexible and can work with your schedule. The interview will take approximately 30-45 minutes.
My dissertation project has been approved both by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Oregon, and by the Research Committee at the Wikimedia Foundation. You can find more information on the project on my meta page.
Please let me know if you have any questions, and I look forward to hearing from you to set up a time to chat. Thank you very much.
Randall Livingstone, School of Journalism & Communication, University of Oregon
UOJComm ( talk) 00:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:37, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Would it be possible for the two bots, DodoBot and TedderBot, to work together or share some capabilities. From my understanding, DodoBot applies WP Project tags to articles in categories corresponding to a project, but does it only once, on demand. TedderBot finds new articles every day, but doesn't apply a WP Project tag to high scoring articles. It would be great if DodoBot could run on a schedule, say once a week, since many articles and categories show up in time. Also, it would be great if TedderBot could apply the WP Project tag to high scoring new articles, categories, templates etc, or at least feed the created list to DodoBot for tagging. Is this (at least partially) doable? Both of them are great bots BTW! Thanks -- Codrin.B ( talk) 22:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello EdoDodo: I recently made a request several days ago for the MessageDeliveryBot to send out a new newsletter to active members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron, but it hasn't been sent at this time. I was hoping you could look into this matter. The request ID number is 256. Please respond at my talk page (talkback, per your instructions above) at your convenience, and thanks. Northamerica1000 (talk) 00:56, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that although most messages were delivered ( see contributions) some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (WPF1 Newsletter (January)). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 21:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC). Delivered here because delivering to User talk:Midgrid failed.
Greetings,
Today I sent a request for an automated message to be sent around using a bot. The confirmation was AwTn7Kfa. I'd like to cancel the request for now. I've tried to go in and edit the request but wasn't provided with an ID or password.
Has the message been sent out yet?
Thanks. -- Jaobar ( talk) 02:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello EdoDodo: I recently made a request several days ago for the MessageDeliveryBot to send out a new newsletter to active members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron, but it hasn't been sent at this time. I was hoping you could look into this matter. The request ID number is 256. Please respond at my talk page (talkback, per your instructions above) at your convenience, and thanks. Northamerica1000 (talk) 14:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello? Do you know how I can make a bot for another wiki? Randomfvideos ( talk) 02:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that although most messages were delivered ( see contributions) some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (WPF1 Newsletter (February)). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 15:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC). Delivered here because delivering to User talk:Midgrid failed.
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
02:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
If i submit an invite for next month's wikification drive can i be 100% sure it'll get delivered? Because last time it wasn't and so had to use AWB… and i'd need to know in advance if i'm going to do that. Thanks, benzband ( talk) 15:31, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Greetings EdoDodo, I'm writing in regards to the MessengerDeliveryBot for which I have used in the past and also have a TUSC approval. A discussion took place on WikiProject Eurovision, in regards to reviving the project newsletter which will be sent out to project members on a monthly basis. However, it will take a long time to deliver the newsletter to person individually, and I was wondering if using the Messenger service would be an acceptable option? If so, would someone from the project need login access to be able to approve and send the newsletters out on-time, without having them in a queuing system which may delay things? I thank you for your time reading this, and for look forward to your response in due course. Regards, Wesley ☀ Mouse 17:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey, EdoDodo, Just a poke not sure if you're aware it seems WelcomerBot has not been operating. Thanks Mlpearc ( powwow) 20:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Sachs 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat ( talk) 03:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Sachs 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat ( talk) 03:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
He's not editing, at his web interface for filing requests is broken. -- Nathan2055 talk - contribs 14:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Dear EdoDodo, your EdoBot had no edits on it.wiki for last 12 months. If you have objections, please answer on my talk, otherwise your bot will be deflagged in 7 days. Best regards, -- Gnu marcoo 16:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)