![]() |
Hi Edmodo23! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Isis (band) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 03:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
9/11 conspiracy theories. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
GAB
Hello!
19:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
BethNaught (
talk)
14:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hey look, I know I was a dick to that Martin guy. I'm sorry. But he removed my fucking images when they weren't even copyrighted. One was a picture of me, one was a mugshot of a teacher, one was a picture of my school, and a few fucking memes. Those aren't copyrighted. It's not like fucking Disney or Viacom owns them. I just don't understand how a few pictures taken by regular people are copyrighted just because they're on the fucking internet. Wiki won't get sued for that shit. Also, I took that picture of me, and it was fucking removed for being copyrighted. WTF?
As for the "vandalism", well, I warned in my fucking userpage that I was prone to making funny edits. I'm just a fucking teacher, making many constructive edits to this site. If you choose to ban me over a few fucking joke edits, you are sacrificing potential useful info that I can add to Wiki pages of schools. Think about it.
Decline reason:
Thought about it. I'm surprised the block is just for a week. --jpgordon ::==( o ) 14:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
How were my images copyrighted?
Decline reason:
Sorry, but pointing you at a long boring wall of text has gotten unavoidable at this point. Please indicate if you have plans of constructive contributions and if you're intending to cease all that swearing, otherwise I'm inclined to extend your block as it totally feels like you're here to screw things, not write an encyclopedia. Max Semenik ( talk) 18:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Okay I get it, but a picture of ME was removed for copyright violation. It was taken in September 2012. sorry for posting this in the form of an unblock request, but it's the only way I can guaruntee my question will be answered.
Decline reason:
Please read the "long boring wall of text" given to you by Max Semenik and come back when you understand copyright. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 09:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Wow, really? Are you really saying a fucking 15-year-old has rights to a picture I had him take of me? I gave the kid my fucking camera and he took the picture and gave it back to me. He never had the picture copyrighted in his name. I understand copyright perfectly. Last time I checked, you had to go in and pay to have something copyrighted. I call bullshit. Even if he was the true copyright holder, do you really expect me to track down a kid who has since graduated, and be like "hey, remember that pic I made you take of me when you were a sophomore? Well, can I have permission to use it on Wikipedia?? LOLOLOL XDXDXD"?? See how ridiculous you sound?
Decline reason:
I am genuinely concerned about your interest in editing in a constructive manner, as well as your ability to work in a collaborative environment like Wikipedia. Declining the unblock request as the initial block was perfectly valid. Please make a concerted effort to contribute constructively once your block expires. Thank you, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 22:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No please don't block me forever. I promise no more unblock requests or copyrighted images. Look at my edits to East Noble High School and Wayne High School. Helpful edits. I have so much more to offer. I'll sit out my block and continue to edit constructively, so more joke edits either, promise. Edmodo23 ( talk) 21:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
Talk:Caillou are for discussion related to improving the article,
not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD
v2.0
03:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
User:Edmodo23 has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. You are neither. SummerPhD
v2.0
02:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
How did I disrupt the Wiki since I was unblocked? Please give me specific examples.
Decline reason:
You are missing the point here. You are not asked or expected to debate the validity of the block; you are required to explain what you will do differently in the future in order to persuade an admin to unblock you. Incidentally, I note in in previous unblock requests you have used the word "fucking" on ten occasions (+one WTF), none of them to any relevant purpose. I suggest that you should try hard to avoid extraneous and pointless profanity in future requests; it does not help to convince us of your positive intentions here. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 16:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I promise I will no longer make joke edits, or post crazy fan theories on talk pages. I have read WP:NOT and I know what I can and can't post anymore. I solemnly swear to only make serious edits from now on, and will refrain from posting senseless humor that has no place on an online encyclopedia, even on other people's talk pages. No more personal attacks, no more vandalism, no more nonsense.
Decline reason:
I tried to find a way for you to come back here, but the more I looked into your editing history the longer the list of promises I would have you make. I had not seen the edits linked to by Mkdw when I discussed your return before. Frankly it is showing a history of inappropriate behaviour going back before your prior block and carried on after. I think if I unblock you that you will make a fool of me. HighInBC 14:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Mike V: do you find this promise to be sufficient? HighInBC 15:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Edmodo23, in addition to edits that are clearly mischief which you have already agreed to stop there are also other edits which are less obviously bad faith. It is also inappropriate to use talk pages for general discussion or personal theories like here and here. As an encyclopedia we have to avoid original research. It is not clear to me if those posts were a joke, or if they were meant seriously. Either way I need you to clarify that you understand not to do this.
Also if unblocked then you will essentially be on your last chance. We have an essay Wikipedia:Give 'em enough rope that describes the situation. I am going out on a limb to make you this offer, please don't make a fool out of me. HighInBC 16:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
I agree to everything stated above Edmodo23 ( talk) 03:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Why are you ignoring me now?
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
It's been days and my unblock request still has not been addressed. Like it hasn't even been discussed yet. Please, I have alot to offer this site, as you can see by my "real" edits. I just need a straightforward answer.
Who are you? Your actions have painted Wayne High School in a negative light. From what I can tell, the moderators at Wikipedia have put you out of commission, so good on them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laheeca ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
User talk:Edmodo23 with
this edit that didn't seem very
civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
06:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Edmodo23! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Isis (band) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 03:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
9/11 conspiracy theories. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
GAB
Hello!
19:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
BethNaught (
talk)
14:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hey look, I know I was a dick to that Martin guy. I'm sorry. But he removed my fucking images when they weren't even copyrighted. One was a picture of me, one was a mugshot of a teacher, one was a picture of my school, and a few fucking memes. Those aren't copyrighted. It's not like fucking Disney or Viacom owns them. I just don't understand how a few pictures taken by regular people are copyrighted just because they're on the fucking internet. Wiki won't get sued for that shit. Also, I took that picture of me, and it was fucking removed for being copyrighted. WTF?
As for the "vandalism", well, I warned in my fucking userpage that I was prone to making funny edits. I'm just a fucking teacher, making many constructive edits to this site. If you choose to ban me over a few fucking joke edits, you are sacrificing potential useful info that I can add to Wiki pages of schools. Think about it.
Decline reason:
Thought about it. I'm surprised the block is just for a week. --jpgordon ::==( o ) 14:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
How were my images copyrighted?
Decline reason:
Sorry, but pointing you at a long boring wall of text has gotten unavoidable at this point. Please indicate if you have plans of constructive contributions and if you're intending to cease all that swearing, otherwise I'm inclined to extend your block as it totally feels like you're here to screw things, not write an encyclopedia. Max Semenik ( talk) 18:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Okay I get it, but a picture of ME was removed for copyright violation. It was taken in September 2012. sorry for posting this in the form of an unblock request, but it's the only way I can guaruntee my question will be answered.
Decline reason:
Please read the "long boring wall of text" given to you by Max Semenik and come back when you understand copyright. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 09:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Wow, really? Are you really saying a fucking 15-year-old has rights to a picture I had him take of me? I gave the kid my fucking camera and he took the picture and gave it back to me. He never had the picture copyrighted in his name. I understand copyright perfectly. Last time I checked, you had to go in and pay to have something copyrighted. I call bullshit. Even if he was the true copyright holder, do you really expect me to track down a kid who has since graduated, and be like "hey, remember that pic I made you take of me when you were a sophomore? Well, can I have permission to use it on Wikipedia?? LOLOLOL XDXDXD"?? See how ridiculous you sound?
Decline reason:
I am genuinely concerned about your interest in editing in a constructive manner, as well as your ability to work in a collaborative environment like Wikipedia. Declining the unblock request as the initial block was perfectly valid. Please make a concerted effort to contribute constructively once your block expires. Thank you, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 22:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No please don't block me forever. I promise no more unblock requests or copyrighted images. Look at my edits to East Noble High School and Wayne High School. Helpful edits. I have so much more to offer. I'll sit out my block and continue to edit constructively, so more joke edits either, promise. Edmodo23 ( talk) 21:08, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a
general rule, talk pages such as
Talk:Caillou are for discussion related to improving the article,
not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD
v2.0
03:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
User:Edmodo23 has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. You are neither. SummerPhD
v2.0
02:25, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
How did I disrupt the Wiki since I was unblocked? Please give me specific examples.
Decline reason:
You are missing the point here. You are not asked or expected to debate the validity of the block; you are required to explain what you will do differently in the future in order to persuade an admin to unblock you. Incidentally, I note in in previous unblock requests you have used the word "fucking" on ten occasions (+one WTF), none of them to any relevant purpose. I suggest that you should try hard to avoid extraneous and pointless profanity in future requests; it does not help to convince us of your positive intentions here. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 16:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edmodo23 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I promise I will no longer make joke edits, or post crazy fan theories on talk pages. I have read WP:NOT and I know what I can and can't post anymore. I solemnly swear to only make serious edits from now on, and will refrain from posting senseless humor that has no place on an online encyclopedia, even on other people's talk pages. No more personal attacks, no more vandalism, no more nonsense.
Decline reason:
I tried to find a way for you to come back here, but the more I looked into your editing history the longer the list of promises I would have you make. I had not seen the edits linked to by Mkdw when I discussed your return before. Frankly it is showing a history of inappropriate behaviour going back before your prior block and carried on after. I think if I unblock you that you will make a fool of me. HighInBC 14:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@ Mike V: do you find this promise to be sufficient? HighInBC 15:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Edmodo23, in addition to edits that are clearly mischief which you have already agreed to stop there are also other edits which are less obviously bad faith. It is also inappropriate to use talk pages for general discussion or personal theories like here and here. As an encyclopedia we have to avoid original research. It is not clear to me if those posts were a joke, or if they were meant seriously. Either way I need you to clarify that you understand not to do this.
Also if unblocked then you will essentially be on your last chance. We have an essay Wikipedia:Give 'em enough rope that describes the situation. I am going out on a limb to make you this offer, please don't make a fool out of me. HighInBC 16:09, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
I agree to everything stated above Edmodo23 ( talk) 03:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Why are you ignoring me now?
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
It's been days and my unblock request still has not been addressed. Like it hasn't even been discussed yet. Please, I have alot to offer this site, as you can see by my "real" edits. I just need a straightforward answer.
Who are you? Your actions have painted Wayne High School in a negative light. From what I can tell, the moderators at Wikipedia have put you out of commission, so good on them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laheeca ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that you made a comment on the page
User talk:Edmodo23 with
this edit that didn't seem very
civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
06:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)