![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This address had been used by the Indonesian NBC/anime misinformation vandal several hours ago; it is currently blocked for 31 hours. I can't believe that the guy had flown under the radar and struck again.
Can you expand the block to either 118.137.0.0/16 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) or 118.137.0.0/17 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) because of this? The Indonesian misinformation vandal has a history of using addresses from the 118.137.*.* range to do his vandalism. Just in case. Thanks in advance - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 21:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Sorry if I decided to resurrect an old thread, but it seems that the Indonesian NBC/anime misinformation vandal has never learned to quit. The guy still vandalizes several articles, including Children's programming on NBC, One to Grow On, NBC Kids, and Daigunder. The addresses he used recently include addresses from the 222.124.4x.* range. The ones I spotted and added to my list are as follows:
I know this is not enough to warrant a rangeblock, but still note worthing. Just a heads-up! - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 10:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
The guy was at it again several hours ago, this time using 139.194.139.228 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Same kinds of articles and then some. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 22:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
PS: The guy also used 110.138.100.84 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) on vandalizing Daigunder. He has been using addresses from the 110.138.*.* range intermittently. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 22:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Hiya,
Thanks for handling that IP issue. Although I think 1 week may not be enough. The user posted attacks on my talk page a couple of days ago after I had issued them warnings about vandalising. As a result of that Discospinster ( talk · contribs) blocked it for 31 hours. The block expired, and the IP then attacked Discospinster. Going off previous history of this IP, there will be no doubt after this block expires, that they will post an attack on your talk page too. Salvio giuliano ( talk · contribs) removed the IP's threat from my talk page history, but I had asked at ANI if it would be possible to get my page semi-protected as a precaution in case the IP crusades on vandalising it; would that request be possible, and if so, where do I go to request it? Thanks Wesley ☀ Mouse 11:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Edgar, I just wanted to let you know that SkepticAnonymous is having a meltdown at the talk page, due in part to the perceived slight that you didn't comment on the block. Don't know whether you want to comment or not, but I just thought I'd let you know. Thanks. Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 14:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Tangentially related: I have somewhat an odd request for you. Could I possibly get you to block my test account User:WK-test for a while(perhaps with some kind of comment and wikilink in the edit summary)? While in the above discussion, it occurred to me that I don't actually know what it looks like when one is blocked, and now I'm a little curious to see what's actually displayed. Thanks! Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 18:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Heya. Just wanted to mention that you might be interested in participating in this discussion: click. Note that he discussion isn't just about that template but applies to all of the drugs by mechanism of action templates. el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 01:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Are you sure you have them correct? There seem to be to many valence electrons shown, eg. tricarbon has an extra lone pair on each carbon. Plasmic Physics ( talk) 12:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I'm dropping a note to ask for your help on the press kit article page. There appears to be one editor (under various IPs and usernames, the most recent of which is Jillguttman2007) who keeps repeatedly changing the lead to the article. The article is about press kits (in all its forms) and this edit they keep insisting upon does not reflect all types of press kits. Their edits have been repeatedly reverted by numerous editors, as can be seen in the page's revision history, so I was hoping you might keep an eye on the page and/or drop this editor a warning (he appears to have been given other warnings in the past, but keeps changing his IP, so it's difficult to keep track of his previous editing activies and/or warnings). I usually contact you about semi-protect locks for bio pages, but (its my strong suspicion) this is the work of just one persistent editor who, for some reason, has fixated on "electronic press kits", so it seems silly to ask for a lock to protect a page from just one editor. Thanks. --- Crakkerjakk ( talk) 21:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi again. First, a quick thanks for keeping an eye on the press kit page (discussed above). I'm writing again to mention something I just noticed. It appears a temporary lock on the Same-sex marriage in the United States article is about to expire in a couple of days. Since President Obama's recent announcement, the issue is front and center again, so I just wanted to drop a note to ask if you'd keep an eye on that page in case it needs its lock extended once the protection expires on May 14. There are no problems on the page (as of yet), but I just have a feeling opinions on all sides of the topic are going to be heating up during this election cycle, given Obama's recently "evolving" position. Thanks --- Crakkerjakk ( talk) 02:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you have addressed some of the recent outings and offensive content surrounding the David Bawden article and related content by changing the visibility of the diffs on page User talk:TSBColorado and User talk:115.249.115.244. There is one additional diff that may need that as there is an outing attempt in the edit summary: [1] Would appreciate if you took a look at the edit summary that specifically attempts to out another editor, and consider a similar visibility change for that diff. Thank you! ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 17:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar181! First off, I'd just like to say thank you for uploading the structures for the drug/compound articles I create. I really appreciate it! That being said however, I've noticed some issues with a few of them that I thought I should mention. The first is that I think the structure you uploaded for isomethadone is incorrect. Compare it to the one for methadone. They're identical as far as I can see. For the isomethadone struct, according to the structure on PubChem ( compare to the one for methadone) the methyl should be at the 5 position instead of the 6 position on the carbon chain (assuming I have my chemistry right; I very well may not). Secondly, I think the structures for alphacetylmethadol and betacetylmethadol might be incorrect as well. Compare them to the ones on PubChem: alpha and beta, respectively. The isometry seems to be inverted in both cases. And lastly, you added "Axomadol.svg" to the drugbox of the axomadol page, but it looks like you forgot to actually upload the file. Would you mind looking into these? el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 20:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Edit: Hmm. Things might be a little more mixed up than I thought with alphacetylmethadol. It looks like the IUPAC and structure on the page for it are for the (+)-isomer (i.e., the mirror image of levacetylmethadol) and not for the racemate like I've been thinking this whole time. Indeed, I got the drugbox for it from ChemSpider, and both ChemSpider and PubMed seem to think that alphacetylmethadol is "dexacetylmethadol" ((+)-α-acetylmethadol) and not the racemate. I can't even find an entry for (±)-alphacetylmethadol on either of the two sites. Very confusing!! Also, both sites seem to be indicating that both the structure and the IUPAC for levacetylmethadol are wrong as well ( link and link). For the structure, it too seems to be inversed, whereas for the IUPAC on the Wiki article it says that the absolute configuration should be "(1S,4S)-" while they say it should be "(3S,6S)". Would you mind taking a look at this for me as well? I'm no chemist so to be perfectly honest in regards to this whole matter I feel a bit like this right now. el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 20:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 16:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC) |
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Subaru BRZ. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi i have edited the content based on the information provided on Essar Steel on their website www.essarsteel.com . The current information is not only old/outdated/incorrect but also lacks full details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.242.118.250 ( talk) 11:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Thought I'd let you know since you last blocked the IP. - jc37 16:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thank you for blocking the user who vandalized my userpage! Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 20:29, 25 May 2012 (UTC) |
89.219.150.21 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Brangifer ( talk) 05:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Heya! I was trying to get the cyproterone page moved to cyproterone acetate (since cyproterone itself is of course a different compound and isn't actually marketed) but it seems that the administrator who attempted to do it for me messed up. Take a look for yourself: cyproterone and cyproterone acetate. I messaged him like half an hour ago or so but I haven't gotten a response. Based on his contributions lately he doesn't seem to be that active, so I'm concerned the page might be down for several hours or longer. Would you mind fixing it? el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 19:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar. An IP has written to ArbCom in relation to this block. It's not an issue that ArbCom should get involved with, and I have advised the IP to direct their enquiries to info-en-q@wikimedia.org; however they have written me again, so I am passing the matter on to you. Obviously they cannot get in touch with you directly because they are blocked, and for reasons of their own they prefer not to register an account to get around the block. If you could email me I will pass on your response to the IP and perhaps you two could discuss the matter together and come to some agreement. SilkTork ✔Tea time 01:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
wiki directed me to this page sorry if I'm not very proficient with wiki parliamentary rules.
You deleted my paragraph saying "somethign is incorrect". Please say what you feel is incorrect if you are going to delete other's work. I really don't see how it was "incorrect" or misleading more than any text or in context.
(you did not leave any note in the talk section or otherwise)
In the "Applications" section, certainly informing the reader that inspecting chemical equations to determing if a reaction will take place (ie, if gas forms) is a good thing mention for the topics that follow and a good thing to elude to in general. Which is why most books mention it as being a point of notice while studying bases, solvents, solutes, etc.
It was not supposed to encompass all possible chemical outcomes: it was just a paragraph.
But thank you for caring I'd enjoy any discussion. Please use the "Talk" for solubility I'm not a "user" for now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.172.35 ( talk) 02:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thank you for blocking the IP who put curses and racially inappropriate statements on "March 15". Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 00:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC) |
You may want to investigate further. He's posted an unblock request. His original version of his userpage had no resemblance whatsoever to the promotional material posted there by an anonymous IP, for which he got blocked. Given the initial userpage message, and the unblock message, I'm inclined to give the benefit of the doubt and unblock, but I wanted to give you a chance to do so first. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 21:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I just thought I'd let you know that you deleted my school district's wikipedia page. While you might believe that "it had no meaningful information" it did at least offer a small bit of info on the school district itself, and was also a template should any future member feel to add to it. It hurt no one by existing, so I'm not quite sure why you deleted it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.79.221 ( talk • contribs)
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but I don't know Wikipedia protocols very well yet. However, I need someone to correct the structure of mecamylamine. I'm editing the article (for no reason in particular except that I know something about cholinergic ligands), and I noticed that one of the endo- isomers of mecamylamine was illustrated in the "structure box". Unfortunately, mecamylamine has only been made in the form of its two "exo-enantiomers" (or, to be more precise, it appears that all pharmacological studies have been on the two enantiomers with the exo-configuration)- precisely the point I want to make in the text. If someone would be kind enough to do the drawing, either of the "exo- enantiomers" will do, and I'll make the appropriate correction to the stereochemical designators in the name.
Thanks. (I hope to be able to do my own drawings soon). Xprofj ( talk) 22:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
My article edit on Chlorodifluoromethane was rolled back by you for this reason: "per WP:CHEMMOS we don't copy MSDS info word-for-word"
The information added was not inaccurate or incorrect, so the next time you want to be a by-the-book robot, please do something positive and fix it instead of removing everything altogether.
And you didn't remove something trivial, you removed health hazard information that was nowhere near present in the article before my edit. I had an accident with Freon-22 and wanted to state it's hazards in Wikipedia.
So next time, try to be pragmatically useful (not just a law abbiding drone) and fix the error instead of erradicating knowledge that was not perfectly in tune with the rules.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.79.35 ( talk) 23:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
You deleted Ken Hudson Campbell ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and restored 63 revisions of it later. With this action however you also removed the semi-protection you just placed on the article. Could you restore semi-protection on the page? Regards, Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 19:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Blekko. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar181! I'm wondering why you deleted that article. It has a IUPAC name and a valid SMILES number. I am not a scientist, but I'm science-literate. What was so wrong with the article? -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
hello, my name is Omoyemi Patrick from Nigeria. could you search and send to me history of the people of Lampese in Akok-edo local government area of Edo state Nigeria.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.184.64.120 ( talk • contribs)
Can I ask why you undid my edit to 2C-I. There is a confirmed case with forensic testing that indicates a male 17 year old died after ingestion of 2C-I. I think it is important to have that information as it is verified by a state forensics lab. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:A:240:2:B918:8E6C:665F:4648 ( talk) 19:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thanks for taking care of the disruptive IP editor on 2012 Republican National Convention. We'd been reverting him over and over for hours. Specs112 t c 20:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. User:Alvaro Filbert is requesting a review of his block. I have no idea what they've actually done. They are on UTRS as #2187. Secretlondon ( talk) 13:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Wow—while I thought this article was weird, post 9/11 cloak-and-dagger stuff, I didn't think it was a hoax. Please tell me what I should have been looking for! All the best, Miniapolis ( talk) 23:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Why were the discussions on deletion of the article closed? When will the discussions re-open? Why was the warning at the top of the main page removed by a non-moderator after it specifically said not to remove it? Is it not still being considered for deletion?
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
For blocking a vandal against BLPs. Bearian ( talk) 15:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC) |
Ed,
Thank you for pointing out said vandalism. While I was unaware of any vandalism, please let me know if anything else arises from this IP address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.4.144.27 ( talk) 03:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm asking you because you were the last admin to delete the Arthur griffiths article today, which has been created again. I don't believe the story that Griffiths was one of the founding officers of the Royal Tank Regiment, so I've tagged this latest reincarnation as a hoax, but there is a real notable Arthur Griffiths, author and Inspector of Prisons, who has an entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography that I can't create for some reason, maybe because of this article's existence? Not sure what to do, can you help? George Ponderevo ( talk) 21:46, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks re 31.25.3.105. Best wishes DBaK ( talk) 14:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thank you for blocking user:81.154.98.50 who vandalized my talk page, calling me a dumbass. Thebestofall007 ( talk) 18:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC) |
User:MBisanz has requested help and feels there is need for new crats.Would you interested in running for cratship ,as I feel you are amongst the few who meet the high standards.Please feel free to say no if you are not interested and wish to work in other areas.Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 18:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Barack Obama on Twitter. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Dextran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FITC ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the WP:CSD#U1 deletes! BigNate37 (T) 21:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
are u trying to ruin my reputation as a business model every page i have made has been deleted by YOU at least give me a chance to edit and make them better ur trying to put me out of business arnt you if u dare do i will get my lawyers on you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clayton2068 ( talk • contribs) 21:09, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Please delete revision 503325834 on page Viewpark for RD2. Thanks! 78.26 ( talk) 20:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'm very sorry to bother you with this, but it's something that has just risen up again and I am still scratching my head about what happened / is still happening. It doesn't help that I don't understand the details of how to follow G6 moves.
These two towns were part of a failed RM at Talk:Cần Thơ/Archive 1 at 7 August 2011 shortly before you were requested to move them. But there's no way you could have known that since, unless my eyes are deceiving me, and I find this a bit hard to believe, The talk page bot link to the failed RM was removed 27 August same for Talk:Thanh Hóa 27 August. I presume this is not normal procedure for requesting a G6? If so, then would you mind checking for me - since I don't know the G6 system there may well be something I am missing. Sorry to bother you, but it may not be an isolated case of misusing the G6 process. In ictu oculi ( talk) 04:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
What it be possible to temporarily restore this page? Theres some coding in the revision history that I would like to take a look at. Thank you.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 12:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Can you add to this? I salvaged it from speedy. Albomycin might be the other name and have more hits.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:23, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar181, perhaps you could comment on Edgar181 is away ( talk · contribs), as they have taken the liberty of using your sig here. Thanks & regards! Franamax ( talk) 16:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey Edgar181. I'm trying to delete a few images that I uploaded. I tagged them for deletion a few days ago but they still haven't been deleted or otherwise changed so I think I might have done it wrong.
Here are the images:
I'm the copyright holder of them both of course.
Thanks. el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 07:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I am from Marketing team of AGC networks. I tried to put my business information on wiki which seems to have been blocked. The reason given is that username is of organization name only. Advise if we need to use the brand tagline like 'enabling experience' to upload content or is there a process which needs to be followed which I am missing on.
Please mail me at <email removed> and help me understand wiki.
Thanks,
Shailendra Tanwar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.242.118.250 ( talk) 10:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
I botched a move this AM for propionitrile. If you could take a quick look and tell me if there is further work required. Sorry for the mess. -- Smokefoot ( talk) 14:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
This appears to be an educational institution and not applicable under A7. I could also be wrong. Could you let me know? Panyd The muffin is not subtle 17:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
A page Abigail grimm was deleted by you on apparent Vandalism terms. I have read and see no reason for this to have taken place. No warnings were given and this is advised on the guidelines page.
Why was this page deleted? Especially so quickly? There could be no time to investigate the article or subject that quickly and the page did not meet 1 or more standards of Speedy Deletion which it must according to Wikiguidlines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 5:45 pm, Today (UTC−4)
May I request all the information I put on that page to be recovered and sent to me? That is the only copy I had and my Sandbox aswell. I am not sure how to access it myself and would be greatly disappointed if it is lost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 5:45 pm, Today (UTC−4) —Preceding undated comment added 15:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I think that it is already turned on if not my email is <email removed>. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 12:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Fictional Characters.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 20:19, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, please I would know why you deleted Yesmoke in 2009 as I would restore it. Your motivation was G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://wikibin.org/articles/yesmoke.html, but that page was a copy of the wikipedia article as wikibin is the recycle bin of wikipedia and the license is free (GFDL). Thank you -- Trek00 ( talk) 17:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick delete on that content. I was just in the process of posting in ANI. I further think the user should be blocked, as betweeen that being their only edit, and their name, I think they are acting in bad faith. But in any case, thanks for the vigilence. Gaijin42 ( talk) 13:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I understood your reasons to delete the isimplex page, because it a user with the name of a company and created an article about themselves. If it was a singular person, that creates an article with the same content this will not be deleted? As you can see, the content wasn't for advertising, just to inform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A santos19 ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
I can see whay you deleted my article. However I do own another micronation that has much more refrences but it is not on microwiki. (don't know if that matters.) CrownprinceJohannes ( talk) 00:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
The move which you declined was the result of the requested move discussion Talk:Cam Pha District#Requeste move, as I indicated in the SD template. Would you please reconsider. Thanks.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Monolaurin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmetic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 03:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. As you are a regular of WP:UAA, you are invited to participate in this RfC, which may influence the noticeboard. Have a good one. NTox · talk 08:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar!
HG was correct, long ago. Enough is enough.
Best regards, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 13:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting all of those for me =) Best, Jona talk to me 14:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi!
I see that you have blocked only
User:115.242.103.209 but not other IPs
User:115.242.32.67,
User:115.242.118.30,
User:115.241.248.73,
User:115.240.61.147,
User:101.63.122.65,
User:115.242.67.170,
User:115.240.42.46,
User:101.2.27.180 and
User:101.2.0.227 that were also reported. Is there some technical reason for not doing so? §§
AnimeshKulkarni (
talk)
15:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
...for your block of IP 114.79.56.193; 23:09. That was quite an evening wasn't it? I was running around like a loon trying to revert him while my Indonesian Internet connection kept dropping out. I wonder what fired him up. Thanks again. Davidelit (Talk) 16:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like you to consider adjusting block settings and/or extending the block on FrancisRowe ( talk · contribs) in light of this invective written during his block. Thank you. — KuyaBriBri Talk 21:32, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar, to update you: Talk:Cà Mau has had a RM to restore the articles moved counter RM (while logged in), after IP activity hiding previous RM (while logged out), and deletion of previous RM notices (while logged in). Can you please now restore the others moved by G6 "uncontroversial requests" counter Talk:Cần Thơ/Archive 1 RM.? I've left a similar note on User talk:Graeme Bartlett, the other admin who actioned these G6. Thanks. In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:19, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar I noticed you have deleted today Hassal Sharif , which was PRODed two days ago. How come the same page is now online at the same pagename?? Am I missing something? -- Itemirus Message me! 16:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for dealing with my request at WP:UAA. I noticed, though, that while you have blocked Mtengraver ( talk · contribs) indefinitely, your block notice at User talk:Mtengraver describes a temporary block. -- John of Reading ( talk) 17:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks, Edgar181, for all you do on Wikipedia, especially keeping my personal pages free of vandalism. Regards, Pinethicket ( talk) 18:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar,
sorry a bit new to this. are you not alloed to mentionn company names in a an article. iewamted to add a section on algae based omega 3 supplements as they are useful to vegetarians and vegans. you have twice deleted it so i'm obviously messing up somewhere! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinpassmore ( talk • contribs) 14:46, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
أشكركم على عرقلة أنا لست كافرا — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.49.88.98 ( talk) 20:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This address had been used by the Indonesian NBC/anime misinformation vandal several hours ago; it is currently blocked for 31 hours. I can't believe that the guy had flown under the radar and struck again.
Can you expand the block to either 118.137.0.0/16 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) or 118.137.0.0/17 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · block user · block log) because of this? The Indonesian misinformation vandal has a history of using addresses from the 118.137.*.* range to do his vandalism. Just in case. Thanks in advance - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 21:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. Sorry if I decided to resurrect an old thread, but it seems that the Indonesian NBC/anime misinformation vandal has never learned to quit. The guy still vandalizes several articles, including Children's programming on NBC, One to Grow On, NBC Kids, and Daigunder. The addresses he used recently include addresses from the 222.124.4x.* range. The ones I spotted and added to my list are as follows:
I know this is not enough to warrant a rangeblock, but still note worthing. Just a heads-up! - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 10:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
The guy was at it again several hours ago, this time using 139.194.139.228 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Same kinds of articles and then some. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 22:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
PS: The guy also used 110.138.100.84 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) on vandalizing Daigunder. He has been using addresses from the 110.138.*.* range intermittently. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 22:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Hiya,
Thanks for handling that IP issue. Although I think 1 week may not be enough. The user posted attacks on my talk page a couple of days ago after I had issued them warnings about vandalising. As a result of that Discospinster ( talk · contribs) blocked it for 31 hours. The block expired, and the IP then attacked Discospinster. Going off previous history of this IP, there will be no doubt after this block expires, that they will post an attack on your talk page too. Salvio giuliano ( talk · contribs) removed the IP's threat from my talk page history, but I had asked at ANI if it would be possible to get my page semi-protected as a precaution in case the IP crusades on vandalising it; would that request be possible, and if so, where do I go to request it? Thanks Wesley ☀ Mouse 11:31, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey, Edgar, I just wanted to let you know that SkepticAnonymous is having a meltdown at the talk page, due in part to the perceived slight that you didn't comment on the block. Don't know whether you want to comment or not, but I just thought I'd let you know. Thanks. Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 14:49, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Tangentially related: I have somewhat an odd request for you. Could I possibly get you to block my test account User:WK-test for a while(perhaps with some kind of comment and wikilink in the edit summary)? While in the above discussion, it occurred to me that I don't actually know what it looks like when one is blocked, and now I'm a little curious to see what's actually displayed. Thanks! Writ Keeper ⚇ ♔ 18:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Heya. Just wanted to mention that you might be interested in participating in this discussion: click. Note that he discussion isn't just about that template but applies to all of the drugs by mechanism of action templates. el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 01:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Are you sure you have them correct? There seem to be to many valence electrons shown, eg. tricarbon has an extra lone pair on each carbon. Plasmic Physics ( talk) 12:59, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I'm dropping a note to ask for your help on the press kit article page. There appears to be one editor (under various IPs and usernames, the most recent of which is Jillguttman2007) who keeps repeatedly changing the lead to the article. The article is about press kits (in all its forms) and this edit they keep insisting upon does not reflect all types of press kits. Their edits have been repeatedly reverted by numerous editors, as can be seen in the page's revision history, so I was hoping you might keep an eye on the page and/or drop this editor a warning (he appears to have been given other warnings in the past, but keeps changing his IP, so it's difficult to keep track of his previous editing activies and/or warnings). I usually contact you about semi-protect locks for bio pages, but (its my strong suspicion) this is the work of just one persistent editor who, for some reason, has fixated on "electronic press kits", so it seems silly to ask for a lock to protect a page from just one editor. Thanks. --- Crakkerjakk ( talk) 21:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi again. First, a quick thanks for keeping an eye on the press kit page (discussed above). I'm writing again to mention something I just noticed. It appears a temporary lock on the Same-sex marriage in the United States article is about to expire in a couple of days. Since President Obama's recent announcement, the issue is front and center again, so I just wanted to drop a note to ask if you'd keep an eye on that page in case it needs its lock extended once the protection expires on May 14. There are no problems on the page (as of yet), but I just have a feeling opinions on all sides of the topic are going to be heating up during this election cycle, given Obama's recently "evolving" position. Thanks --- Crakkerjakk ( talk) 02:17, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you have addressed some of the recent outings and offensive content surrounding the David Bawden article and related content by changing the visibility of the diffs on page User talk:TSBColorado and User talk:115.249.115.244. There is one additional diff that may need that as there is an outing attempt in the edit summary: [1] Would appreciate if you took a look at the edit summary that specifically attempts to out another editor, and consider a similar visibility change for that diff. Thank you! ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 17:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar181! First off, I'd just like to say thank you for uploading the structures for the drug/compound articles I create. I really appreciate it! That being said however, I've noticed some issues with a few of them that I thought I should mention. The first is that I think the structure you uploaded for isomethadone is incorrect. Compare it to the one for methadone. They're identical as far as I can see. For the isomethadone struct, according to the structure on PubChem ( compare to the one for methadone) the methyl should be at the 5 position instead of the 6 position on the carbon chain (assuming I have my chemistry right; I very well may not). Secondly, I think the structures for alphacetylmethadol and betacetylmethadol might be incorrect as well. Compare them to the ones on PubChem: alpha and beta, respectively. The isometry seems to be inverted in both cases. And lastly, you added "Axomadol.svg" to the drugbox of the axomadol page, but it looks like you forgot to actually upload the file. Would you mind looking into these? el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 20:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Edit: Hmm. Things might be a little more mixed up than I thought with alphacetylmethadol. It looks like the IUPAC and structure on the page for it are for the (+)-isomer (i.e., the mirror image of levacetylmethadol) and not for the racemate like I've been thinking this whole time. Indeed, I got the drugbox for it from ChemSpider, and both ChemSpider and PubMed seem to think that alphacetylmethadol is "dexacetylmethadol" ((+)-α-acetylmethadol) and not the racemate. I can't even find an entry for (±)-alphacetylmethadol on either of the two sites. Very confusing!! Also, both sites seem to be indicating that both the structure and the IUPAC for levacetylmethadol are wrong as well ( link and link). For the structure, it too seems to be inversed, whereas for the IUPAC on the Wiki article it says that the absolute configuration should be "(1S,4S)-" while they say it should be "(3S,6S)". Would you mind taking a look at this for me as well? I'm no chemist so to be perfectly honest in regards to this whole matter I feel a bit like this right now. el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 20:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 16:29, 18 May 2012 (UTC) |
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Subaru BRZ. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:15, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi i have edited the content based on the information provided on Essar Steel on their website www.essarsteel.com . The current information is not only old/outdated/incorrect but also lacks full details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.242.118.250 ( talk) 11:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Thought I'd let you know since you last blocked the IP. - jc37 16:42, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thank you for blocking the user who vandalized my userpage! Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 20:29, 25 May 2012 (UTC) |
89.219.150.21 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Brangifer ( talk) 05:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Heya! I was trying to get the cyproterone page moved to cyproterone acetate (since cyproterone itself is of course a different compound and isn't actually marketed) but it seems that the administrator who attempted to do it for me messed up. Take a look for yourself: cyproterone and cyproterone acetate. I messaged him like half an hour ago or so but I haven't gotten a response. Based on his contributions lately he doesn't seem to be that active, so I'm concerned the page might be down for several hours or longer. Would you mind fixing it? el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 19:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar. An IP has written to ArbCom in relation to this block. It's not an issue that ArbCom should get involved with, and I have advised the IP to direct their enquiries to info-en-q@wikimedia.org; however they have written me again, so I am passing the matter on to you. Obviously they cannot get in touch with you directly because they are blocked, and for reasons of their own they prefer not to register an account to get around the block. If you could email me I will pass on your response to the IP and perhaps you two could discuss the matter together and come to some agreement. SilkTork ✔Tea time 01:23, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
wiki directed me to this page sorry if I'm not very proficient with wiki parliamentary rules.
You deleted my paragraph saying "somethign is incorrect". Please say what you feel is incorrect if you are going to delete other's work. I really don't see how it was "incorrect" or misleading more than any text or in context.
(you did not leave any note in the talk section or otherwise)
In the "Applications" section, certainly informing the reader that inspecting chemical equations to determing if a reaction will take place (ie, if gas forms) is a good thing mention for the topics that follow and a good thing to elude to in general. Which is why most books mention it as being a point of notice while studying bases, solvents, solutes, etc.
It was not supposed to encompass all possible chemical outcomes: it was just a paragraph.
But thank you for caring I'd enjoy any discussion. Please use the "Talk" for solubility I'm not a "user" for now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.172.35 ( talk) 02:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thank you for blocking the IP who put curses and racially inappropriate statements on "March 15". Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 00:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC) |
You may want to investigate further. He's posted an unblock request. His original version of his userpage had no resemblance whatsoever to the promotional material posted there by an anonymous IP, for which he got blocked. Given the initial userpage message, and the unblock message, I'm inclined to give the benefit of the doubt and unblock, but I wanted to give you a chance to do so first. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 21:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I just thought I'd let you know that you deleted my school district's wikipedia page. While you might believe that "it had no meaningful information" it did at least offer a small bit of info on the school district itself, and was also a template should any future member feel to add to it. It hurt no one by existing, so I'm not quite sure why you deleted it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.79.221 ( talk • contribs)
Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but I don't know Wikipedia protocols very well yet. However, I need someone to correct the structure of mecamylamine. I'm editing the article (for no reason in particular except that I know something about cholinergic ligands), and I noticed that one of the endo- isomers of mecamylamine was illustrated in the "structure box". Unfortunately, mecamylamine has only been made in the form of its two "exo-enantiomers" (or, to be more precise, it appears that all pharmacological studies have been on the two enantiomers with the exo-configuration)- precisely the point I want to make in the text. If someone would be kind enough to do the drawing, either of the "exo- enantiomers" will do, and I'll make the appropriate correction to the stereochemical designators in the name.
Thanks. (I hope to be able to do my own drawings soon). Xprofj ( talk) 22:39, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
My article edit on Chlorodifluoromethane was rolled back by you for this reason: "per WP:CHEMMOS we don't copy MSDS info word-for-word"
The information added was not inaccurate or incorrect, so the next time you want to be a by-the-book robot, please do something positive and fix it instead of removing everything altogether.
And you didn't remove something trivial, you removed health hazard information that was nowhere near present in the article before my edit. I had an accident with Freon-22 and wanted to state it's hazards in Wikipedia.
So next time, try to be pragmatically useful (not just a law abbiding drone) and fix the error instead of erradicating knowledge that was not perfectly in tune with the rules.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.195.79.35 ( talk) 23:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
You deleted Ken Hudson Campbell ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and restored 63 revisions of it later. With this action however you also removed the semi-protection you just placed on the article. Could you restore semi-protection on the page? Regards, Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 19:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Blekko. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar181! I'm wondering why you deleted that article. It has a IUPAC name and a valid SMILES number. I am not a scientist, but I'm science-literate. What was so wrong with the article? -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
hello, my name is Omoyemi Patrick from Nigeria. could you search and send to me history of the people of Lampese in Akok-edo local government area of Edo state Nigeria.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.184.64.120 ( talk • contribs)
Can I ask why you undid my edit to 2C-I. There is a confirmed case with forensic testing that indicates a male 17 year old died after ingestion of 2C-I. I think it is important to have that information as it is verified by a state forensics lab. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:A:240:2:B918:8E6C:665F:4648 ( talk) 19:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thanks for taking care of the disruptive IP editor on 2012 Republican National Convention. We'd been reverting him over and over for hours. Specs112 t c 20:31, 22 June 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. User:Alvaro Filbert is requesting a review of his block. I have no idea what they've actually done. They are on UTRS as #2187. Secretlondon ( talk) 13:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Wow—while I thought this article was weird, post 9/11 cloak-and-dagger stuff, I didn't think it was a hoax. Please tell me what I should have been looking for! All the best, Miniapolis ( talk) 23:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Why were the discussions on deletion of the article closed? When will the discussions re-open? Why was the warning at the top of the main page removed by a non-moderator after it specifically said not to remove it? Is it not still being considered for deletion?
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
For blocking a vandal against BLPs. Bearian ( talk) 15:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC) |
Ed,
Thank you for pointing out said vandalism. While I was unaware of any vandalism, please let me know if anything else arises from this IP address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.4.144.27 ( talk) 03:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm asking you because you were the last admin to delete the Arthur griffiths article today, which has been created again. I don't believe the story that Griffiths was one of the founding officers of the Royal Tank Regiment, so I've tagged this latest reincarnation as a hoax, but there is a real notable Arthur Griffiths, author and Inspector of Prisons, who has an entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography that I can't create for some reason, maybe because of this article's existence? Not sure what to do, can you help? George Ponderevo ( talk) 21:46, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks re 31.25.3.105. Best wishes DBaK ( talk) 14:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thank you for blocking user:81.154.98.50 who vandalized my talk page, calling me a dumbass. Thebestofall007 ( talk) 18:30, 13 July 2012 (UTC) |
User:MBisanz has requested help and feels there is need for new crats.Would you interested in running for cratship ,as I feel you are amongst the few who meet the high standards.Please feel free to say no if you are not interested and wish to work in other areas.Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 18:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Barack Obama on Twitter. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 14:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Dextran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FITC ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the WP:CSD#U1 deletes! BigNate37 (T) 21:02, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
are u trying to ruin my reputation as a business model every page i have made has been deleted by YOU at least give me a chance to edit and make them better ur trying to put me out of business arnt you if u dare do i will get my lawyers on you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clayton2068 ( talk • contribs) 21:09, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Please delete revision 503325834 on page Viewpark for RD2. Thanks! 78.26 ( talk) 20:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I'm very sorry to bother you with this, but it's something that has just risen up again and I am still scratching my head about what happened / is still happening. It doesn't help that I don't understand the details of how to follow G6 moves.
These two towns were part of a failed RM at Talk:Cần Thơ/Archive 1 at 7 August 2011 shortly before you were requested to move them. But there's no way you could have known that since, unless my eyes are deceiving me, and I find this a bit hard to believe, The talk page bot link to the failed RM was removed 27 August same for Talk:Thanh Hóa 27 August. I presume this is not normal procedure for requesting a G6? If so, then would you mind checking for me - since I don't know the G6 system there may well be something I am missing. Sorry to bother you, but it may not be an isolated case of misusing the G6 process. In ictu oculi ( talk) 04:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
What it be possible to temporarily restore this page? Theres some coding in the revision history that I would like to take a look at. Thank you.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 12:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Can you add to this? I salvaged it from speedy. Albomycin might be the other name and have more hits.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:23, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar181, perhaps you could comment on Edgar181 is away ( talk · contribs), as they have taken the liberty of using your sig here. Thanks & regards! Franamax ( talk) 16:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey Edgar181. I'm trying to delete a few images that I uploaded. I tagged them for deletion a few days ago but they still haven't been deleted or otherwise changed so I think I might have done it wrong.
Here are the images:
I'm the copyright holder of them both of course.
Thanks. el3ctr0nika ( Talk | Contribs) 07:04, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
I am from Marketing team of AGC networks. I tried to put my business information on wiki which seems to have been blocked. The reason given is that username is of organization name only. Advise if we need to use the brand tagline like 'enabling experience' to upload content or is there a process which needs to be followed which I am missing on.
Please mail me at <email removed> and help me understand wiki.
Thanks,
Shailendra Tanwar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.242.118.250 ( talk) 10:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
I botched a move this AM for propionitrile. If you could take a quick look and tell me if there is further work required. Sorry for the mess. -- Smokefoot ( talk) 14:39, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
This appears to be an educational institution and not applicable under A7. I could also be wrong. Could you let me know? Panyd The muffin is not subtle 17:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
A page Abigail grimm was deleted by you on apparent Vandalism terms. I have read and see no reason for this to have taken place. No warnings were given and this is advised on the guidelines page.
Why was this page deleted? Especially so quickly? There could be no time to investigate the article or subject that quickly and the page did not meet 1 or more standards of Speedy Deletion which it must according to Wikiguidlines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 5:45 pm, Today (UTC−4)
May I request all the information I put on that page to be recovered and sent to me? That is the only copy I had and my Sandbox aswell. I am not sure how to access it myself and would be greatly disappointed if it is lost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 5:45 pm, Today (UTC−4) —Preceding undated comment added 15:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I think that it is already turned on if not my email is <email removed>. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 12:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Fictional Characters.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 19:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielj27052705 ( talk • contribs) 20:19, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, please I would know why you deleted Yesmoke in 2009 as I would restore it. Your motivation was G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://wikibin.org/articles/yesmoke.html, but that page was a copy of the wikipedia article as wikibin is the recycle bin of wikipedia and the license is free (GFDL). Thank you -- Trek00 ( talk) 17:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick delete on that content. I was just in the process of posting in ANI. I further think the user should be blocked, as betweeen that being their only edit, and their name, I think they are acting in bad faith. But in any case, thanks for the vigilence. Gaijin42 ( talk) 13:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I understood your reasons to delete the isimplex page, because it a user with the name of a company and created an article about themselves. If it was a singular person, that creates an article with the same content this will not be deleted? As you can see, the content wasn't for advertising, just to inform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A santos19 ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
I can see whay you deleted my article. However I do own another micronation that has much more refrences but it is not on microwiki. (don't know if that matters.) CrownprinceJohannes ( talk) 00:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
The move which you declined was the result of the requested move discussion Talk:Cam Pha District#Requeste move, as I indicated in the SD template. Would you please reconsider. Thanks.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Monolaurin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosmetic ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 03:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. As you are a regular of WP:UAA, you are invited to participate in this RfC, which may influence the noticeboard. Have a good one. NTox · talk 08:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar!
HG was correct, long ago. Enough is enough.
Best regards, Kiefer .Wolfowitz 13:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting all of those for me =) Best, Jona talk to me 14:44, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi!
I see that you have blocked only
User:115.242.103.209 but not other IPs
User:115.242.32.67,
User:115.242.118.30,
User:115.241.248.73,
User:115.240.61.147,
User:101.63.122.65,
User:115.242.67.170,
User:115.240.42.46,
User:101.2.27.180 and
User:101.2.0.227 that were also reported. Is there some technical reason for not doing so? §§
AnimeshKulkarni (
talk)
15:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
...for your block of IP 114.79.56.193; 23:09. That was quite an evening wasn't it? I was running around like a loon trying to revert him while my Indonesian Internet connection kept dropping out. I wonder what fired him up. Thanks again. Davidelit (Talk) 16:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like you to consider adjusting block settings and/or extending the block on FrancisRowe ( talk · contribs) in light of this invective written during his block. Thank you. — KuyaBriBri Talk 21:32, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar, to update you: Talk:Cà Mau has had a RM to restore the articles moved counter RM (while logged in), after IP activity hiding previous RM (while logged out), and deletion of previous RM notices (while logged in). Can you please now restore the others moved by G6 "uncontroversial requests" counter Talk:Cần Thơ/Archive 1 RM.? I've left a similar note on User talk:Graeme Bartlett, the other admin who actioned these G6. Thanks. In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:19, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar I noticed you have deleted today Hassal Sharif , which was PRODed two days ago. How come the same page is now online at the same pagename?? Am I missing something? -- Itemirus Message me! 16:47, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for dealing with my request at WP:UAA. I noticed, though, that while you have blocked Mtengraver ( talk · contribs) indefinitely, your block notice at User talk:Mtengraver describes a temporary block. -- John of Reading ( talk) 17:36, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks, Edgar181, for all you do on Wikipedia, especially keeping my personal pages free of vandalism. Regards, Pinethicket ( talk) 18:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Edgar,
sorry a bit new to this. are you not alloed to mentionn company names in a an article. iewamted to add a section on algae based omega 3 supplements as they are useful to vegetarians and vegans. you have twice deleted it so i'm obviously messing up somewhere! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinpassmore ( talk • contribs) 14:46, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
أشكركم على عرقلة أنا لست كافرا — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.49.88.98 ( talk) 20:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |