You seem to be editing the same articles as blocked account User talk:74.76.67.208. Are you the same person? Bahooka ( talk) 03:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
No. EdelweissofNE ( talk) 10:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi EdelweissofNE! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:EdelweissofNE reported by User:Toddst1 (Result: ). Thank you.
Toddst1 (
talk)
22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, EdelweissofNE. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Crossgates Mall, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Toddst1 Zero conflict of interest here. Thank you though. EdelweissofNE ( talk) 23:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.
[1]
Toddst1 (
talk) 23:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Clearly a mistake.
EdelweissofNE (
talk)
23:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
PhilKnight (
talk)
02:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EdelweissofNE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 10:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EdelweissofNE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Scr★pIron IV 13:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EdelweissofNE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
You seem to be editing the same articles as blocked account User talk:74.76.67.208. Are you the same person? Bahooka ( talk) 03:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
No. EdelweissofNE ( talk) 10:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi EdelweissofNE! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:EdelweissofNE reported by User:Toddst1 (Result: ). Thank you.
Toddst1 (
talk)
22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, EdelweissofNE. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Crossgates Mall, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Toddst1 ( talk) 22:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Toddst1 Zero conflict of interest here. Thank you though. EdelweissofNE ( talk) 23:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.
[1]
Toddst1 (
talk) 23:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Clearly a mistake.
EdelweissofNE (
talk)
23:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
PhilKnight (
talk)
02:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EdelweissofNE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 10:45, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EdelweissofNE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Scr★pIron IV 13:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EdelweissofNE, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.