![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Here here. Thanks for the vote.-- Play Brian Moore 22:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Would you care to substantiate your accusation at
WP:RFCN with some proof? Thanks -
RJASE1
Talk
00:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
-- ALoan (Talk) 10:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
The fat guy seen in statues that people often call Buddha is really Hotei. Interesting ehh? HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 02:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Like I said I saw your comment, how do you go about doing it, because I've noticed that instead of each project page saying user page, or article, they say project page. I want to start a project for Kaballah; please leave a message for me. Thanks. Lighthead 04:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you started up a project somewhere I can't remember where; but nevermind I already started it. You're invited to join, here's the link. Wikipedia: WikiProject Kabbalah. Thanks. Lighthead 23:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
As you appear to be active at the moment and are in the Wikipedians from Chicago category, could you check out this thread if you haven't already? Thanks :) Veesicle ( Talk) ( Contribs) 02:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
This may be a case similiar to the pedophile proposal. There aren't enough cases to justify it, it may be better to know then have users hide it and really do it, and theres probably WP:BEANS concerns here. - M ask? 05:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Just to let you know, I have nominated the project for deletion. My reasons are given on the discussion page, but as a courtesy I am informing you as the project's creator. Regards, Vizjim 05:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
As a rule, simpler=better, particularly when, in my opinion, the alternative seems a little peculiar. "...due to the arguements that Esperanza's stress alerts program would be able to help out all of the stressed, ill, or departing Wikipedians." Did anyone say that? If so, I missed it completely. As far as I can remember, the main argument against stress alerts was that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social networking site or a support group. Similarly, I don't think that "* Esperanza was a nice and well-intentioned idea, but it was simply impossible to implement by means of formal processes and a bureaucratic organization" really reflects community consensus, which was pretty much that Esperanza couldn't work at all. Moreschi Request a recording? 15:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Ed, you've broken the three revert rule on the above page, would you please revert yourself back to the version before you last edited it so you no-longer infringe, thank you Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/ talk 16:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
From WP:3RR: "An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time." It doesn't matter whether the material is the same or different: edit warring is still unacceptable, as the policy makes clear. You should know better. Moreschi Request a recording? 17:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
After previously warning you regarding 3RR, I have blocked you for 24 hours, if you want to appeal the block, please place {{Unblock|reason for unblock}} on your talk page. When this block expires, please discuss before edit warring Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/ talk 16:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Ed ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
These edits are very much different-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? 17:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were edit warring, anyone can see that. Stop wikilawyering. – Steel 17:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I would say don't panic yet, many of those have been up since January. Maybe you want to link your proposal at the talk pages of articles like Diplomacy or State Department or United Nations. But I certainly support your broad scope, and if you want to be bold, I have done that with two other WikiProjects. :) Chris 03:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Brother Ed! I have actually been thinking the exact same thing, but
Ed, I know you haven't got into another edit war over esparanza, but I am requesting that you discuss all changes to the page before implementing. I have said the same to Dev, it is going to get serious soon Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/ talk 00:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
I have created a mediation page for Wikipedia:Esperanza in the above link, please read the instructions on the top of the page and right your statement of what you wish to do to the page under the appropriate heading. Regards Ryan Postlethwaite 11:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't actually go to VA Tech; I was just changing my sig in memory of the tragedy. I've clarified it now. But thanks for being a good person and caring. Ab e g92 We are all Hokies! 02:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ed, I saw your question about "Wikipedia is not a memorial" on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of victims of the Virginia Tech massacre. It's listed under "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" on WP:NOT: "Memorials. Wikipedia is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must be notable besides being fondly remembered." The shortcut for it is WP:NOT#MEMORIAL. Hope this helps. -- Idont Havaname ( Talk) 03:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I recently left a comment about your move request for the Esperanza deletion archives at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Incomplete and contested proposals. If you want to go forward with the request, please take a look. Thanks... Dekimasu よ! 04:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. You assisted me back in March with an article I edited for the young band Still Pending. There was some dispute over the images I uploaded with permission. The article and images were subsequently deleted and I never had a chance to participate in the AfD discussion. Would you mind lending your opinion to the deletion review discussion currently underway regarding this article? The discussion is here: WP:DRV#Still_Pending. Thank you. Stampsations 03:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Ed, I'll get back to you tomorrow regarding your mediation statement, I've got a very poor internet connection tonight (I'm stealing it off next door!) so I haven't got enough time to address your concerns. In the mean time, any chance you could get together a proposed new essay Esperanza? Put in it everything you would like to see in it - but please don't completely change it. We can put it to the community if required. Please note, I took a long hard look at your statement before commenting, I read it quite a few time. All the best. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
Request completed. :) Whenever an article is restored, the undeletion of its talk page is permitted. I usually don't do it automatically, because talk pages mostly harbor clutter. Whenever anyone asks, though, it's not a problem at all. Best wishes, Xoloz 15:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ed, I've gotmy final year project at uni in for thusday so I really haven't got timeto give full analysis on the mediation, is it ok if we wait till then? I don't want to give a poor response, it needs to be done properly. I'll get back to you on the adoption question tomorrow as I want to check the users contribs. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
see Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists The Placebo Effect 14:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
hi ed, sorry but im leading the mediation on esparanza so im not willing to comment on what should be included. When i said no major changes what i meant was the odd gramatical change here and there not adding extra community views. I suggest you go back to the mediation page and take a look at other proposols that have been put forward so far. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Here here. Thanks for the vote.-- Play Brian Moore 22:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Would you care to substantiate your accusation at
WP:RFCN with some proof? Thanks -
RJASE1
Talk
00:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
-- ALoan (Talk) 10:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
The fat guy seen in statues that people often call Buddha is really Hotei. Interesting ehh? HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 02:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Like I said I saw your comment, how do you go about doing it, because I've noticed that instead of each project page saying user page, or article, they say project page. I want to start a project for Kaballah; please leave a message for me. Thanks. Lighthead 04:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
I saw that you started up a project somewhere I can't remember where; but nevermind I already started it. You're invited to join, here's the link. Wikipedia: WikiProject Kabbalah. Thanks. Lighthead 23:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
As you appear to be active at the moment and are in the Wikipedians from Chicago category, could you check out this thread if you haven't already? Thanks :) Veesicle ( Talk) ( Contribs) 02:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
This may be a case similiar to the pedophile proposal. There aren't enough cases to justify it, it may be better to know then have users hide it and really do it, and theres probably WP:BEANS concerns here. - M ask? 05:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Just to let you know, I have nominated the project for deletion. My reasons are given on the discussion page, but as a courtesy I am informing you as the project's creator. Regards, Vizjim 05:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
As a rule, simpler=better, particularly when, in my opinion, the alternative seems a little peculiar. "...due to the arguements that Esperanza's stress alerts program would be able to help out all of the stressed, ill, or departing Wikipedians." Did anyone say that? If so, I missed it completely. As far as I can remember, the main argument against stress alerts was that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social networking site or a support group. Similarly, I don't think that "* Esperanza was a nice and well-intentioned idea, but it was simply impossible to implement by means of formal processes and a bureaucratic organization" really reflects community consensus, which was pretty much that Esperanza couldn't work at all. Moreschi Request a recording? 15:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Ed, you've broken the three revert rule on the above page, would you please revert yourself back to the version before you last edited it so you no-longer infringe, thank you Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/ talk 16:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
From WP:3RR: "An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time." It doesn't matter whether the material is the same or different: edit warring is still unacceptable, as the policy makes clear. You should know better. Moreschi Request a recording? 17:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
After previously warning you regarding 3RR, I have blocked you for 24 hours, if you want to appeal the block, please place {{Unblock|reason for unblock}} on your talk page. When this block expires, please discuss before edit warring Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/ talk 16:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Ed ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
These edits are very much different-- Ed ¿Cómo estás? 17:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were edit warring, anyone can see that. Stop wikilawyering. – Steel 17:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I would say don't panic yet, many of those have been up since January. Maybe you want to link your proposal at the talk pages of articles like Diplomacy or State Department or United Nations. But I certainly support your broad scope, and if you want to be bold, I have done that with two other WikiProjects. :) Chris 03:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Brother Ed! I have actually been thinking the exact same thing, but
Ed, I know you haven't got into another edit war over esparanza, but I am requesting that you discuss all changes to the page before implementing. I have said the same to Dev, it is going to get serious soon Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/ talk 00:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
I have created a mediation page for Wikipedia:Esperanza in the above link, please read the instructions on the top of the page and right your statement of what you wish to do to the page under the appropriate heading. Regards Ryan Postlethwaite 11:10, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't actually go to VA Tech; I was just changing my sig in memory of the tragedy. I've clarified it now. But thanks for being a good person and caring. Ab e g92 We are all Hokies! 02:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ed, I saw your question about "Wikipedia is not a memorial" on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of victims of the Virginia Tech massacre. It's listed under "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" on WP:NOT: "Memorials. Wikipedia is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must be notable besides being fondly remembered." The shortcut for it is WP:NOT#MEMORIAL. Hope this helps. -- Idont Havaname ( Talk) 03:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
I recently left a comment about your move request for the Esperanza deletion archives at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Incomplete and contested proposals. If you want to go forward with the request, please take a look. Thanks... Dekimasu よ! 04:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. You assisted me back in March with an article I edited for the young band Still Pending. There was some dispute over the images I uploaded with permission. The article and images were subsequently deleted and I never had a chance to participate in the AfD discussion. Would you mind lending your opinion to the deletion review discussion currently underway regarding this article? The discussion is here: WP:DRV#Still_Pending. Thank you. Stampsations 03:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Ed, I'll get back to you tomorrow regarding your mediation statement, I've got a very poor internet connection tonight (I'm stealing it off next door!) so I haven't got enough time to address your concerns. In the mean time, any chance you could get together a proposed new essay Esperanza? Put in it everything you would like to see in it - but please don't completely change it. We can put it to the community if required. Please note, I took a long hard look at your statement before commenting, I read it quite a few time. All the best. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
Request completed. :) Whenever an article is restored, the undeletion of its talk page is permitted. I usually don't do it automatically, because talk pages mostly harbor clutter. Whenever anyone asks, though, it's not a problem at all. Best wishes, Xoloz 15:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Ed, I've gotmy final year project at uni in for thusday so I really haven't got timeto give full analysis on the mediation, is it ok if we wait till then? I don't want to give a poor response, it needs to be done properly. I'll get back to you on the adoption question tomorrow as I want to check the users contribs. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
see Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists The Placebo Effect 14:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
hi ed, sorry but im leading the mediation on esparanza so im not willing to comment on what should be included. When i said no major changes what i meant was the odd gramatical change here and there not adding extra community views. I suggest you go back to the mediation page and take a look at other proposols that have been put forward so far. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)