Please do not edit this page.
This subpage is where I keep all things relating to the technical operation of Wikipedia. For anything else, please see my
main talk page. Thank you.
You didn't put your Vfd nomination in the right position. It belongs in the Vfd log, not in the page of the previous Vfd. Georgia guy 23:45, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Hi - I speedy-deleted this page, because it's a recreation of the page deleted through VfD a few months ago. I think it would be okay to remove the entry from VfD, since it's already resolved. Thanks for catching this. CDC (talk) 16:40, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
A page you created, Association of American Feed Control Officials, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. ukexpat ( talk) 19:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm assuming that this is a honest mistake, but please be careful about erasing other people's votes. Yours, R adiant _* 12:09, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. 22:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Template:Creationism2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Neelix ( talk) 20:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
As of 19 May 2005, all images which are "non-commercial only" are to be deleted on sight. The image above will be deleted unless a case for fair-use is asserted. ed g2s • talk 16:05, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
The procedure at pui is After 15 days in phase 1, move images to phase 2 and add {{ unverifedimage}} to the caption of images I think that means you have to edit all the pages that the image appears on. Did you do this when you moved images a few days ago? Zeimusu | (Talk page) 14:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
When an image is moved from Phase I to Phase II, please only place the unverified image thing on the article and leave the stuff on the image page itself. The extra edit in history confuses me when I go to delete them and is unnecessary. Cheers. Burgundavia ( ✈ take a flight?) 23:36, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
I tagged your image Image:Galileo Satellite System.jpg by {{ No source}} tag. Please add required information. -- RuM 16:21, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I've recently created a Usability WikiProject. The intent is to make Wikipedia easier and more pleasant to use by encouraging things like accessibility, Cross-browser support, standardized templates, and so on. I noticed some of your comments on Template talk:Cleanup, and thought that you may be interested. –M T 30 June 2005 06:31 (UTC)
Stare as I might I can't seem to find: Search Wikipedia using the box to the left. Is it possible that some of us using different skins than you would need to look up or for that matter look down for our search box? At the very least please remove this inaccuracy. You may note that this page has been edited to by many others before you took notice. The consensus seems suggest as simple a page as possible to increase the liklihood of the neophyte user reading it at all. Please be courteous and read what has gone on before you impose your own wisdom without discussion. Thanks, -- hydnjo talk 22:14, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Reverting the image, not the template.
The image it was using is a strange alteration from the original image. ¦ Reisio 15:24, 2005 July 10 (UTC)
There. I got the best of both worlds by using the Qif template to determine the size of the icon. If the template is only two lines, the icon is reduced, but if the template has three lines, the icon is full-size. ;)
Denelson 83 10:25, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
OK, I see what you were doing now. I thought it was more deletionism, which I found very surprising, considering it was you. My apologies. FeloniousMonk 16:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi. You appear to be slightly confused about how category filing works in Wikipedia: this edit certainly doesn't do what your edit summary would imply you think it does. The default filing by the article name lists the article under the "R" section of the category and would file it after "Red" but before "Rfd" if such articles existed. The suffix means that it would be filed after a separate "Red Wizards" article, but as there isn't one of those (it's a pointless redirect at the moment), this isn't an issue. By filing it as "* Red Wizards", you are causing the article to be listed at the start of the category, which is a place reserved for the most important article(s) about each topic. You could specify the sort key as "Red Wizards", but as noted above this is a non-issue. Please read and review WP:CAT#Category sorting. I will revert your edit. Cheers -- Pak21 12:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do not bite the newbies at the RD, there's no call for either the "dead question" box or posting anonymous IP addresses there. Poorly formatted anonymous questions are welcome, even if they can become frustrating. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 13:58, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi, please don't remove unanswered questions from WP:RD/L. Thanks! -- Angr/ tɔk tə mi 21:34, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Do we really need that extra page? We have one already at Wikipedia:Reference desk/How to ask and answer :-) Do you have another idea in mind? -- HappyCamper 23:57, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Why have you removed all the images from geo stubs? There is no explanation of your edits on Talk pages.-- Mais oui! 20:04, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Also, take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#Include-only_for_stub_categories_on_stub_templates regarding not using includeonly for the categories on stub templates, but instead using <noinclude>|*</noinclude> to sort the template to the beginning of the category. Also, the new image server should help alleviate some of the lag from images... -- Mairi 05:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi - please NEVER EVER use "noinclude" on stub templates! It is vital for stub sorters to be able to tell at a glance whether templates have been correctly formatted, i.e., whether they hav a correctly named companion category. With noinclude this is impossible. I have reverted several of the Canadian province geo-stub categories you have done this with - what other templates have you altered in this way? Grutness... wha? 10:36, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
See, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (fauna). Sea lion should be at the lowercase since it is about a genus. -- Peta 10:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not edit this page.
This subpage is where I keep all things relating to the technical operation of Wikipedia. For anything else, please see my
main talk page. Thank you.
You didn't put your Vfd nomination in the right position. It belongs in the Vfd log, not in the page of the previous Vfd. Georgia guy 23:45, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Hi - I speedy-deleted this page, because it's a recreation of the page deleted through VfD a few months ago. I think it would be okay to remove the entry from VfD, since it's already resolved. Thanks for catching this. CDC (talk) 16:40, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
A page you created, Association of American Feed Control Officials, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. ukexpat ( talk) 19:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm assuming that this is a honest mistake, but please be careful about erasing other people's votes. Yours, R adiant _* 12:09, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. 22:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Template:Creationism2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Neelix ( talk) 20:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
As of 19 May 2005, all images which are "non-commercial only" are to be deleted on sight. The image above will be deleted unless a case for fair-use is asserted. ed g2s • talk 16:05, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
The procedure at pui is After 15 days in phase 1, move images to phase 2 and add {{ unverifedimage}} to the caption of images I think that means you have to edit all the pages that the image appears on. Did you do this when you moved images a few days ago? Zeimusu | (Talk page) 14:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
When an image is moved from Phase I to Phase II, please only place the unverified image thing on the article and leave the stuff on the image page itself. The extra edit in history confuses me when I go to delete them and is unnecessary. Cheers. Burgundavia ( ✈ take a flight?) 23:36, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
I tagged your image Image:Galileo Satellite System.jpg by {{ No source}} tag. Please add required information. -- RuM 16:21, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I've recently created a Usability WikiProject. The intent is to make Wikipedia easier and more pleasant to use by encouraging things like accessibility, Cross-browser support, standardized templates, and so on. I noticed some of your comments on Template talk:Cleanup, and thought that you may be interested. –M T 30 June 2005 06:31 (UTC)
Stare as I might I can't seem to find: Search Wikipedia using the box to the left. Is it possible that some of us using different skins than you would need to look up or for that matter look down for our search box? At the very least please remove this inaccuracy. You may note that this page has been edited to by many others before you took notice. The consensus seems suggest as simple a page as possible to increase the liklihood of the neophyte user reading it at all. Please be courteous and read what has gone on before you impose your own wisdom without discussion. Thanks, -- hydnjo talk 22:14, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Reverting the image, not the template.
The image it was using is a strange alteration from the original image. ¦ Reisio 15:24, 2005 July 10 (UTC)
There. I got the best of both worlds by using the Qif template to determine the size of the icon. If the template is only two lines, the icon is reduced, but if the template has three lines, the icon is full-size. ;)
Denelson 83 10:25, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
OK, I see what you were doing now. I thought it was more deletionism, which I found very surprising, considering it was you. My apologies. FeloniousMonk 16:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi. You appear to be slightly confused about how category filing works in Wikipedia: this edit certainly doesn't do what your edit summary would imply you think it does. The default filing by the article name lists the article under the "R" section of the category and would file it after "Red" but before "Rfd" if such articles existed. The suffix means that it would be filed after a separate "Red Wizards" article, but as there isn't one of those (it's a pointless redirect at the moment), this isn't an issue. By filing it as "* Red Wizards", you are causing the article to be listed at the start of the category, which is a place reserved for the most important article(s) about each topic. You could specify the sort key as "Red Wizards", but as noted above this is a non-issue. Please read and review WP:CAT#Category sorting. I will revert your edit. Cheers -- Pak21 12:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Please do not bite the newbies at the RD, there's no call for either the "dead question" box or posting anonymous IP addresses there. Poorly formatted anonymous questions are welcome, even if they can become frustrating. — Lomn | Talk / RfC 13:58, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi, please don't remove unanswered questions from WP:RD/L. Thanks! -- Angr/ tɔk tə mi 21:34, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Do we really need that extra page? We have one already at Wikipedia:Reference desk/How to ask and answer :-) Do you have another idea in mind? -- HappyCamper 23:57, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
Why have you removed all the images from geo stubs? There is no explanation of your edits on Talk pages.-- Mais oui! 20:04, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
Also, take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals#Include-only_for_stub_categories_on_stub_templates regarding not using includeonly for the categories on stub templates, but instead using <noinclude>|*</noinclude> to sort the template to the beginning of the category. Also, the new image server should help alleviate some of the lag from images... -- Mairi 05:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi - please NEVER EVER use "noinclude" on stub templates! It is vital for stub sorters to be able to tell at a glance whether templates have been correctly formatted, i.e., whether they hav a correctly named companion category. With noinclude this is impossible. I have reverted several of the Canadian province geo-stub categories you have done this with - what other templates have you altered in this way? Grutness... wha? 10:36, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
See, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (fauna). Sea lion should be at the lowercase since it is about a genus. -- Peta 10:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)