1 article tagged with {{ cleanup}} from April 2024 does not have a reason specified. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cleanup template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Template:Cleanup is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
In Special:Diff/825313685 to B-tree I got an invalid, misformatted link to editing a section in the phrase 'Please help improve this section if you can'.
Apparently this was caused by the 'section' parameter with whitespace spanning across lines – the problem automagically disappeared when I brought the closing vertical bar to the same line in the next edit Special:Diff/825352957. -- CiaPan ( talk) 23:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Per mw:Recommendations_for_mobile_friendly_articles#Limit_page_issue_to_two_lines_of_text this template should make use of the "fix" ambox property to clearly separate the "reason" from the "issue" and use "hide-when-compact". By not doing so, when viewing Transport in Brazil on a mobile display, the text is cut off abruptly. I've added Category:Templates_that_are_not_mobile_friendly to this template while this remains unfixed. Jdlrobson ( talk) 18:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To my mind, in the default output notification "The specific problem is: … Please help …", a period should be added before Please help
. (Please be so kind as to ping me when answering. Thanks a lot in advance!) Regards--
Hildeoc (
talk) 20:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Hildeoc (
talk) 20:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
|reason=
parameter became mandatory. The
first example given in the doc shows the use of a full stop. Including a default full stop would mess up the presentation when someone has a more puzzled reason? or a more emphatic reason! If you feel it's not made clear, please update the documentation.
Cabayi (
talk) 07:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can anybody provide support for this issue regarding the template documentation?-- Hildeoc ( talk) 17:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC) Hildeoc ( talk) 17:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
With regard to transclusions of this template, I would recommend adding a period at the end of the reason=
parameter, so as to make sure a period is rendered by default before the subsequent parameter default phrases, which bar none seem to begin with capitals (e. g. "Please help improve this article if you can" or "Relevant discussion may be found …").--
Hildeoc (
talk) 19:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Hildeoc (
talk) 19:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
When one puts e. g.
one gets interesting results:
This garbage dump may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: primary sources. Please help improve this garbage dump if you can. |
Is the template supposed to work like that? -- Ouro ( blah blah) 10:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
1 article tagged with {{ cleanup}} from April 2024 does not have a reason specified. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cleanup template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Template:Cleanup is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's
documentation to add usage notes or
categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This template was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
In Special:Diff/825313685 to B-tree I got an invalid, misformatted link to editing a section in the phrase 'Please help improve this section if you can'.
Apparently this was caused by the 'section' parameter with whitespace spanning across lines – the problem automagically disappeared when I brought the closing vertical bar to the same line in the next edit Special:Diff/825352957. -- CiaPan ( talk) 23:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Per mw:Recommendations_for_mobile_friendly_articles#Limit_page_issue_to_two_lines_of_text this template should make use of the "fix" ambox property to clearly separate the "reason" from the "issue" and use "hide-when-compact". By not doing so, when viewing Transport in Brazil on a mobile display, the text is cut off abruptly. I've added Category:Templates_that_are_not_mobile_friendly to this template while this remains unfixed. Jdlrobson ( talk) 18:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
To my mind, in the default output notification "The specific problem is: … Please help …", a period should be added before Please help
. (Please be so kind as to ping me when answering. Thanks a lot in advance!) Regards--
Hildeoc (
talk) 20:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Hildeoc (
talk) 20:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
|reason=
parameter became mandatory. The
first example given in the doc shows the use of a full stop. Including a default full stop would mess up the presentation when someone has a more puzzled reason? or a more emphatic reason! If you feel it's not made clear, please update the documentation.
Cabayi (
talk) 07:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can anybody provide support for this issue regarding the template documentation?-- Hildeoc ( talk) 17:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC) Hildeoc ( talk) 17:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
With regard to transclusions of this template, I would recommend adding a period at the end of the reason=
parameter, so as to make sure a period is rendered by default before the subsequent parameter default phrases, which bar none seem to begin with capitals (e. g. "Please help improve this article if you can" or "Relevant discussion may be found …").--
Hildeoc (
talk) 19:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Hildeoc (
talk) 19:29, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
When one puts e. g.
one gets interesting results:
This garbage dump may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: primary sources. Please help improve this garbage dump if you can. |
Is the template supposed to work like that? -- Ouro ( blah blah) 10:32, 8 March 2024 (UTC)