Hello, Easton. Please remember to sign all your comments on talkpages with 4 tildes (~~~~). I anticipate all the fantastic contributions I am sure you will make. Hopefully they won't get marked as vandalism or deletion. By the way, don't make jokes if they appear to be a personal attack. They tend to be a little buearocratic with policy here. I don't really know what you want to get involved in. I guess the Philosophy Portal is somewhere you could start. Well, here's the generic welcome:
Welcome!
Hello, Eastonlee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Billscottbob (
talk)
03:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
The article William Scott Beacom has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki ( talk) 04:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
WP:NPP Billscottbob ( talk) 04:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Good to see you've got your own account... remember to use it for the good of society. Although that might conflict with your philosophy... Carmabelle7912 ( talk) 05:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Bruce Hendricks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}} to the top of
Bruce Hendricks.
Chromaticity
17:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I have marked Leanne Adams for Speedy Deletion with {{db-bio}}. Its blatantly insignificant and does not require WP:Afd debate. Billscottbob 17:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Please put warning templates on a user's talk page, not their main user page. Billscottbob 00:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
You recently placed a {{ tfd}} template on this page. Please note that {{ tfd}} is for use on Templates only, and it has been removed. If you want to suggest the page be deleted, please use {{ subst:afd}} ot {{ subst:prod|reason}}. Stifle ( talk) 17:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Vancouver Canucks, you will be
blocked from editing.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
JNW (
talk)
21:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Eastonlee! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
Hi Eastonlee,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Easton. Please remember to sign all your comments on talkpages with 4 tildes (~~~~). I anticipate all the fantastic contributions I am sure you will make. Hopefully they won't get marked as vandalism or deletion. By the way, don't make jokes if they appear to be a personal attack. They tend to be a little buearocratic with policy here. I don't really know what you want to get involved in. I guess the Philosophy Portal is somewhere you could start. Well, here's the generic welcome:
Welcome!
Hello, Eastonlee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Billscottbob (
talk)
03:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
The article William Scott Beacom has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki ( talk) 04:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
WP:NPP Billscottbob ( talk) 04:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Good to see you've got your own account... remember to use it for the good of society. Although that might conflict with your philosophy... Carmabelle7912 ( talk) 05:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Bruce Hendricks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}} to the top of
Bruce Hendricks.
Chromaticity
17:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I have marked Leanne Adams for Speedy Deletion with {{db-bio}}. Its blatantly insignificant and does not require WP:Afd debate. Billscottbob 17:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Please put warning templates on a user's talk page, not their main user page. Billscottbob 00:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
You recently placed a {{ tfd}} template on this page. Please note that {{ tfd}} is for use on Templates only, and it has been removed. If you want to suggest the page be deleted, please use {{ subst:afd}} ot {{ subst:prod|reason}}. Stifle ( talk) 17:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Vancouver Canucks, you will be
blocked from editing.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
JNW (
talk)
21:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Eastonlee! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
Hi Eastonlee,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)