This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for creating the 1990 template promptly. You inspired me to create the 1991 template, which was fun to do since I was a Michigan student during Desmond Howard's Heisman Trophy season.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 05:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Eagles. Once again, I request your assistance. User:Mystylplx is sockpuppeting on and vandalising the Ralph Nader presidential campaign, 2000 article. Here he talks with himself again to create the appearance of a consensus, as User:Mystylplx and IP 207.158.4.64:
(cur | prev) 17:31, 2 October 2011 Mystylplx (talk | contribs) (2,335 bytes) (undo) (cur | prev) 17:12, 2 October 2011 207.158.4.64 (talk) (2,103 bytes) (→Third Party Voting Controversy) (undo)
And where he repeatedly deletes sourced material:
I'm tired of this repeat offender. Please assist.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.147.237 ( talk) 19:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC) ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I am supplying additional links which may be helpful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/207.158.35.55
01:06, 15 June 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Music therapy (→Giving Wikipedia a bad name) 01:00, 15 June 2011 (diff | hist) Happy Hairston (Hap!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/209.216.228.53
00:39, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Matt Gonzalez (correction) 00:38, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Matt Gonzalez (→On the board: edits) 00:36, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Happy Hairston (Hap!) 00:35, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Hermann Oberth (Oberth!) 00:34, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Dayton, Ohio (punctuation!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=SCFilm29
23:57, 21 June 2010 (diff | hist) Happy Hairston (Hap!)
Of course, in each case we see the odd " Happy Hairston (Hap!)" edit. Also, the "On the board" edit to the article on Matt Gonzalez "happens" to involve "Wikipedia Idiots" and the author, while "Talk:Music therapy" is directed at the sister of the author. The same IP visited the web site of the author's sister just one day prior to this edit, searching two pages listing the sister's appearance on radio regarding music therapy. Also, take special note of the IP addresses for each. SCFilm uses 71-, i.e., home IP for "Griot," while 207- is the self-confessed "public" IP for "Mystylplx," which appears to have been done repeatedly:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Eagles247&diff=prev&oldid=402117332
From the Ralph Nader talk page:
IP 207.231.4.168, are you Mystylplx? 99.59.98.198 (talk) 09:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes. That is me. Mystylplx (talk) 10:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Like his denial of knowing "Griot," amazing under the circumstances, considering the Happy Hairston (Hap!) edit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Eagles247&diff=prev&oldid=402499673
Certainly, one cannot reasonably deny these strikingly odd and obscure identical edits.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.147.237 ( talk) 19:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/207.158.35.55
Same strange edit notes as Griot's banned handle "SCFilm29." Edits Talk:Music Therapy 6/15 after visit to "Wikipedia Idiots" author's sister company web pages 6/14, same 207- IP. Pages list sister's involvement with Music4Life music therapy program. Goes to "Wikipedia Idiots article, posts weird poetry about article author.
Same 207- IP posts to a website called "The Nervous Breakdown" regarding the author's sister. Makes repeated visits to related web sites. Posts on WikiAnswers.
More on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Mystylplx http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=SCFilm29
Handles for "Griot," i.e., "Mystylplx" and "SCFilm29," both into same "conspiracy"-related articles, particularly Chemtrail and 911. User began in conjunction with appearance by "Wikipedia Idiots" author's sister and is, again, mocking, as per:
http://www.sanderhicks.com/truthstock.html
The relation of these handles, i.e., "Griot" and "Mystylplx," per the Wikipedia web site, is particularly with the Ralph Nader-related articles. "Mystylplx" aggressively holds the same position on the Ralph Nader and related articles as Griot, and was "praised" by a handle from Griot's IP that you banned, i.e., SCFilm29. Griot frequently wrote to himself on his SP discussion pages. More specifically, Mystylplx aggressively holds the exact same position on a quote from the Atlantic Monthly regarding Ralph Nader, and the source of activity for which the user was banned:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Griot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SCFilm29#Blocked_indefinitely http://www.sfweekly.com/2008-02-13/news/wikipedia-idiots-the-edit-wars-of-san-francisco/
Julie Dash is directing a movie written by the sister of the author of "Wikipedia Idiots." Both handles make dubious edits to the Julie Dash Wikipedia article, such as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Julie_Dash&diff=431921760&oldid=416768904 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Julie_Dash&diff=414811273&oldid=414173793
Both IPs have vandalized the Julie Dash article and the IMDb pages related to Julie Dash and the author's sister. Both IPs have hit several websites related to "Wikipedia Idiots" author, including the article page and company web site pages of the author's sister. Mystylplx claims not to have known anything about Griot, yet he has for years visited the aforementioned web sites relating to Griot and the indiviudals he stalks, namely, the Spicuzzas and those related to them. Then falsely claims he doesn't know anything about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Ralph_Nader&diff=443741186&oldid=443739887
The IP 207- use of Latin on the Ralph Nader 2000 article talk page, it is meant to mock my use of Latin.
There is more, but too much to go through and post here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.147.237 ( talk) 21:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you 99.88.147.237 ( talk) 21:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Feel free to use CheckUser on me. I specifically logged out so my IP address will be visible. You also have my permission to look back through the years to see what timespan it was that I had the ip address starting with 207. It's highly unlikely (though not impossible) that there's any overlap with any of the stuff mentioned above. As far as I can see this guy has decided that this Griot person once had an ip address starting with 207, and that because I also once had an IP address starting with 207 that must mean we are the same person. That's the totality of his "evidence." To be honest I'm really getting sick of this persons harassment and edit warring. He lost the consensus on the Ralph Nader article and so is now trying the same thing on the 2000 election article. You want evidence of sockpuppetry? Look back a few months at the Nader article when this user announced he was leaving for a month, suddenly another IP user showed up making absolutely identical edits and arguments and claiming not to be the same person, then that new IP user vanished exactly when this user returned. Coincidence? Not likely. 69.230.118.58 ( talk) 03:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Yes, the above is me. Mystylplx ( talk) 03:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, again a new IP for the one you blocked. What does one do with these IP-forever situations? History2007 ( talk) 19:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Do you mind giving Mike Echols (American football) a quick copy-edit? I may consider trying to make it into a good article, but not if it doesn't have a chance. Thanks,-- Giants27( T| C) 22:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Does this constitue his being placed on IR (last paragraph)? By the way, I doubt the Colts would place Manning on IR considering he IS the Indianapolis Colts and, if there was even the slightest chance he could play towards the end, they might just jump on it. Bryan Thomas? While his loss hurts, he isn't the face of a franchise and his return isn't likely. Two completely different situations. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 23:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
When an article is currently a GAN don't you erase the past one where it says GA fail? Sorry if that's wrong, I just thought so. TRLIJC19 ( talk) 02:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Source: http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/awards/all-america-1980-1989.html -- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 02:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I understand what you're talking about, I will stop trying canvassing. Thanks Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 22:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hello. I would like some admin help/guidance. I see from you main page that you may mainly deal with just NFL stuff, but I'd like some help with a couple of issues I have some some College Football articles. If you can't help me directly, can you at least give me the name of an admin that generally covers College Football. I questions involve the use of the AP Poll in the main 2011 NCAA Division I FBS football season and then the use of the Coaches' Poll in other articles such as the 2011 Oklahoma Sooners football team. Thank you. Rocket maniac RT 00:51, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
I was going to post something about his recent death but since the basic details were there, it ended up being a null edit. – BuickCentury Driver 22:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Is it necessary to add to the 2011 NFL lockout, "It was the first time the NFL had ever had a lockout." Sorry for how your Eagles are currently playing right now. Wayne Slam 20:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Giants going to win NFC East. I don't like Philadelphia and Boston teams. (Latter more so than former)You sad that Philadelphia lost NLDS? I wanted them to lose after the Yankees went down.-- 1966batfan ( talk) 02:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Also, explain FartTarts' motives.-- 1966batfan ( talk) 02:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
As a reg, I thought you might have an opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Colors.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 19:06, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Someone put in two things on Pop Warner in the Eagles section. Can you fix one of them please. I don't know what I did that was wrong. I'll fix the other one about Pop Warner after I see what you do to fix the first one. 66.234.33.8 ( talk) 22:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Eagles. While I will grant that the comment that provoked it was inappropriate - and I have left mysterytrey a note about it, asking them to remove it - your response is not going to help the situation much. Could you remove your comment as well, please? Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 03:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm making an article on a List of Penn State Nittany Lions football football seasons. I was wondering if you could help contribute things to the article, such as linking the seasons and bowl games to the individual articles and such. You can contribute edits here. For more information, click here. Thanks. Thomsonmg2000 ( talk) 19:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey Eagles, I protected the article for a day in anticipation of more crappy comments. Overrule me if you disagree. Take care, Drmies ( talk) 20:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
After your recent edit, the infobox now says he's #8, but it doesn't associate this jersey number with a team. This seems incomplete to me. I can see both sides here (memorialize his retired jersey vs. don't list him on a team he's not currently on). What do you think? Richwales ( talk) 23:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I think the reason that you page protected Carson Palmer was the content disputes over the issue of rather or not it was official that he had been traded to the Oakland Raiders, that issue is no longer in dispute, Seeing if you agree with me that there is now not a reason to protect it.▪◦▪ ≡SiREX≡ Talk 23:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
My page had all the information it needed to be created. I don't understand why you would delete it, you could of informed me what needs improving I'm new to Wikipedia and personally I think you're a sad man who has nothing better to do than troll Wikipedia when I spent a lot of time on my edits. Stay off my edits I'm just trying to help the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeliciousFruitcake ( talk • contribs) 23:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you very much. 99.12.181.124 ( talk) 03:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I mean't no disrespect. If I came across in the wrong way the I apologise but I don't think it's right you delete articles that have shown significance. My article highlighted the significance of the person (Joshua Lloyd). It showed the work they have archived and the work they are planing for the future in 2012. It also explained how he founded Sagabren Studios, and the change he is making to the community.I got my information from many sources including: Facebook and his personal website, www.jwgl.co which is currently unavailable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeliciousFruitcake ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Eagles 24/7. I noticed you commented on my images at Wikimedia commons and was wondering if you could help me out with something. I recently wrote an article, Rebecca Pope, and I found three images I wanted to use. I found two on google and cropped/brightened them for copyright purposes. The other one was the picture from Elizabeth Reaser's page cropped/brightened. I don't know if I'm allowed to use these images but if I am, how would I do it and what licenses would I put? And if not, what is a way for me to legally get pictures on the page I wrote? Hope you can help, TRLIJC19 ( talk) 22:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
What do you mean by "the public domain"? Thanks, TRLIJC19 ( talk) 21:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Okay thanks. TRLIJC19 ( talk) 21:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Could you please RevDel this edit per criteria #2? Thanks. -- JayJasper ( talk) 18:18, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
In the studio albums table in the 1017 Brick Squad Records article, there are still empty columns squashed together. How would I remove them completely? -- Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 21:35, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
|
's, which accounted for the empty columns.
Help:Table may be of help, as well.
Eagles
24/7
(C) 22:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Template:Dislike has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rainbow Dash !xmcuvg2MH 00:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
It appears they may be correct, see
[2]. It certainly doesn't look like clear vandalism.
Monty
845 17:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC) whoops that is a really old article.
Monty
845 17:39, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
It was horrible, I would have trouted you anyway.-- 1966batfan ( talk) 01:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
Lol yeah that makes more sense. TRLIJC19 ( talk) 03:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
Oh ok. Thanks. TRLIJC19 ( talk) 03:48, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for creating the 1990 template promptly. You inspired me to create the 1991 template, which was fun to do since I was a Michigan student during Desmond Howard's Heisman Trophy season.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 05:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello Eagles. Once again, I request your assistance. User:Mystylplx is sockpuppeting on and vandalising the Ralph Nader presidential campaign, 2000 article. Here he talks with himself again to create the appearance of a consensus, as User:Mystylplx and IP 207.158.4.64:
(cur | prev) 17:31, 2 October 2011 Mystylplx (talk | contribs) (2,335 bytes) (undo) (cur | prev) 17:12, 2 October 2011 207.158.4.64 (talk) (2,103 bytes) (→Third Party Voting Controversy) (undo)
And where he repeatedly deletes sourced material:
I'm tired of this repeat offender. Please assist.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.147.237 ( talk) 19:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC) ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
I am supplying additional links which may be helpful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/207.158.35.55
01:06, 15 June 2011 (diff | hist) Talk:Music therapy (→Giving Wikipedia a bad name) 01:00, 15 June 2011 (diff | hist) Happy Hairston (Hap!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/209.216.228.53
00:39, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Matt Gonzalez (correction) 00:38, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Matt Gonzalez (→On the board: edits) 00:36, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Happy Hairston (Hap!) 00:35, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Hermann Oberth (Oberth!) 00:34, 20 June 2011 (diff | hist) Dayton, Ohio (punctuation!)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=SCFilm29
23:57, 21 June 2010 (diff | hist) Happy Hairston (Hap!)
Of course, in each case we see the odd " Happy Hairston (Hap!)" edit. Also, the "On the board" edit to the article on Matt Gonzalez "happens" to involve "Wikipedia Idiots" and the author, while "Talk:Music therapy" is directed at the sister of the author. The same IP visited the web site of the author's sister just one day prior to this edit, searching two pages listing the sister's appearance on radio regarding music therapy. Also, take special note of the IP addresses for each. SCFilm uses 71-, i.e., home IP for "Griot," while 207- is the self-confessed "public" IP for "Mystylplx," which appears to have been done repeatedly:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Eagles247&diff=prev&oldid=402117332
From the Ralph Nader talk page:
IP 207.231.4.168, are you Mystylplx? 99.59.98.198 (talk) 09:29, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes. That is me. Mystylplx (talk) 10:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Like his denial of knowing "Griot," amazing under the circumstances, considering the Happy Hairston (Hap!) edit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Eagles247&diff=prev&oldid=402499673
Certainly, one cannot reasonably deny these strikingly odd and obscure identical edits.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.147.237 ( talk) 19:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/207.158.35.55
Same strange edit notes as Griot's banned handle "SCFilm29." Edits Talk:Music Therapy 6/15 after visit to "Wikipedia Idiots" author's sister company web pages 6/14, same 207- IP. Pages list sister's involvement with Music4Life music therapy program. Goes to "Wikipedia Idiots article, posts weird poetry about article author.
Same 207- IP posts to a website called "The Nervous Breakdown" regarding the author's sister. Makes repeated visits to related web sites. Posts on WikiAnswers.
More on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=Mystylplx http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&target=SCFilm29
Handles for "Griot," i.e., "Mystylplx" and "SCFilm29," both into same "conspiracy"-related articles, particularly Chemtrail and 911. User began in conjunction with appearance by "Wikipedia Idiots" author's sister and is, again, mocking, as per:
http://www.sanderhicks.com/truthstock.html
The relation of these handles, i.e., "Griot" and "Mystylplx," per the Wikipedia web site, is particularly with the Ralph Nader-related articles. "Mystylplx" aggressively holds the same position on the Ralph Nader and related articles as Griot, and was "praised" by a handle from Griot's IP that you banned, i.e., SCFilm29. Griot frequently wrote to himself on his SP discussion pages. More specifically, Mystylplx aggressively holds the exact same position on a quote from the Atlantic Monthly regarding Ralph Nader, and the source of activity for which the user was banned:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Griot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SCFilm29#Blocked_indefinitely http://www.sfweekly.com/2008-02-13/news/wikipedia-idiots-the-edit-wars-of-san-francisco/
Julie Dash is directing a movie written by the sister of the author of "Wikipedia Idiots." Both handles make dubious edits to the Julie Dash Wikipedia article, such as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Julie_Dash&diff=431921760&oldid=416768904 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Julie_Dash&diff=414811273&oldid=414173793
Both IPs have vandalized the Julie Dash article and the IMDb pages related to Julie Dash and the author's sister. Both IPs have hit several websites related to "Wikipedia Idiots" author, including the article page and company web site pages of the author's sister. Mystylplx claims not to have known anything about Griot, yet he has for years visited the aforementioned web sites relating to Griot and the indiviudals he stalks, namely, the Spicuzzas and those related to them. Then falsely claims he doesn't know anything about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Ralph_Nader&diff=443741186&oldid=443739887
The IP 207- use of Latin on the Ralph Nader 2000 article talk page, it is meant to mock my use of Latin.
There is more, but too much to go through and post here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.147.237 ( talk) 21:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you 99.88.147.237 ( talk) 21:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Feel free to use CheckUser on me. I specifically logged out so my IP address will be visible. You also have my permission to look back through the years to see what timespan it was that I had the ip address starting with 207. It's highly unlikely (though not impossible) that there's any overlap with any of the stuff mentioned above. As far as I can see this guy has decided that this Griot person once had an ip address starting with 207, and that because I also once had an IP address starting with 207 that must mean we are the same person. That's the totality of his "evidence." To be honest I'm really getting sick of this persons harassment and edit warring. He lost the consensus on the Ralph Nader article and so is now trying the same thing on the 2000 election article. You want evidence of sockpuppetry? Look back a few months at the Nader article when this user announced he was leaving for a month, suddenly another IP user showed up making absolutely identical edits and arguments and claiming not to be the same person, then that new IP user vanished exactly when this user returned. Coincidence? Not likely. 69.230.118.58 ( talk) 03:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Yes, the above is me. Mystylplx ( talk) 03:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, again a new IP for the one you blocked. What does one do with these IP-forever situations? History2007 ( talk) 19:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Do you mind giving Mike Echols (American football) a quick copy-edit? I may consider trying to make it into a good article, but not if it doesn't have a chance. Thanks,-- Giants27( T| C) 22:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Does this constitue his being placed on IR (last paragraph)? By the way, I doubt the Colts would place Manning on IR considering he IS the Indianapolis Colts and, if there was even the slightest chance he could play towards the end, they might just jump on it. Bryan Thomas? While his loss hurts, he isn't the face of a franchise and his return isn't likely. Two completely different situations. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 23:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
When an article is currently a GAN don't you erase the past one where it says GA fail? Sorry if that's wrong, I just thought so. TRLIJC19 ( talk) 02:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Source: http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/awards/all-america-1980-1989.html -- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 02:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
I understand what you're talking about, I will stop trying canvassing. Thanks Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 22:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hello. I would like some admin help/guidance. I see from you main page that you may mainly deal with just NFL stuff, but I'd like some help with a couple of issues I have some some College Football articles. If you can't help me directly, can you at least give me the name of an admin that generally covers College Football. I questions involve the use of the AP Poll in the main 2011 NCAA Division I FBS football season and then the use of the Coaches' Poll in other articles such as the 2011 Oklahoma Sooners football team. Thank you. Rocket maniac RT 00:51, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
I was going to post something about his recent death but since the basic details were there, it ended up being a null edit. – BuickCentury Driver 22:58, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Is it necessary to add to the 2011 NFL lockout, "It was the first time the NFL had ever had a lockout." Sorry for how your Eagles are currently playing right now. Wayne Slam 20:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Giants going to win NFC East. I don't like Philadelphia and Boston teams. (Latter more so than former)You sad that Philadelphia lost NLDS? I wanted them to lose after the Yankees went down.-- 1966batfan ( talk) 02:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Also, explain FartTarts' motives.-- 1966batfan ( talk) 02:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
As a reg, I thought you might have an opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Colors.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 19:06, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Someone put in two things on Pop Warner in the Eagles section. Can you fix one of them please. I don't know what I did that was wrong. I'll fix the other one about Pop Warner after I see what you do to fix the first one. 66.234.33.8 ( talk) 22:44, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Eagles. While I will grant that the comment that provoked it was inappropriate - and I have left mysterytrey a note about it, asking them to remove it - your response is not going to help the situation much. Could you remove your comment as well, please? Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 03:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm making an article on a List of Penn State Nittany Lions football football seasons. I was wondering if you could help contribute things to the article, such as linking the seasons and bowl games to the individual articles and such. You can contribute edits here. For more information, click here. Thanks. Thomsonmg2000 ( talk) 19:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Hey Eagles, I protected the article for a day in anticipation of more crappy comments. Overrule me if you disagree. Take care, Drmies ( talk) 20:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
After your recent edit, the infobox now says he's #8, but it doesn't associate this jersey number with a team. This seems incomplete to me. I can see both sides here (memorialize his retired jersey vs. don't list him on a team he's not currently on). What do you think? Richwales ( talk) 23:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
I think the reason that you page protected Carson Palmer was the content disputes over the issue of rather or not it was official that he had been traded to the Oakland Raiders, that issue is no longer in dispute, Seeing if you agree with me that there is now not a reason to protect it.▪◦▪ ≡SiREX≡ Talk 23:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
My page had all the information it needed to be created. I don't understand why you would delete it, you could of informed me what needs improving I'm new to Wikipedia and personally I think you're a sad man who has nothing better to do than troll Wikipedia when I spent a lot of time on my edits. Stay off my edits I'm just trying to help the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeliciousFruitcake ( talk • contribs) 23:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you very much. 99.12.181.124 ( talk) 03:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I mean't no disrespect. If I came across in the wrong way the I apologise but I don't think it's right you delete articles that have shown significance. My article highlighted the significance of the person (Joshua Lloyd). It showed the work they have archived and the work they are planing for the future in 2012. It also explained how he founded Sagabren Studios, and the change he is making to the community.I got my information from many sources including: Facebook and his personal website, www.jwgl.co which is currently unavailable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeliciousFruitcake ( talk • contribs) 17:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Eagles 24/7. I noticed you commented on my images at Wikimedia commons and was wondering if you could help me out with something. I recently wrote an article, Rebecca Pope, and I found three images I wanted to use. I found two on google and cropped/brightened them for copyright purposes. The other one was the picture from Elizabeth Reaser's page cropped/brightened. I don't know if I'm allowed to use these images but if I am, how would I do it and what licenses would I put? And if not, what is a way for me to legally get pictures on the page I wrote? Hope you can help, TRLIJC19 ( talk) 22:07, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
What do you mean by "the public domain"? Thanks, TRLIJC19 ( talk) 21:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Okay thanks. TRLIJC19 ( talk) 21:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Could you please RevDel this edit per criteria #2? Thanks. -- JayJasper ( talk) 18:18, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
In the studio albums table in the 1017 Brick Squad Records article, there are still empty columns squashed together. How would I remove them completely? -- Skamecrazy123 ( talk) 21:35, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
|
's, which accounted for the empty columns.
Help:Table may be of help, as well.
Eagles
24/7
(C) 22:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Template:Dislike has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rainbow Dash !xmcuvg2MH 00:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
It appears they may be correct, see
[2]. It certainly doesn't look like clear vandalism.
Monty
845 17:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC) whoops that is a really old article.
Monty
845 17:39, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
It was horrible, I would have trouted you anyway.-- 1966batfan ( talk) 01:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
Lol yeah that makes more sense. TRLIJC19 ( talk) 03:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC) |
Oh ok. Thanks. TRLIJC19 ( talk) 03:48, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |