-- 19:28, Monday, January 8, 2018 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 16:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Musée des Beaux-Arts de Dijon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, E-Stylus!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
20:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 19:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:Hily Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hily Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Mjs1991 ( talk) 07:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)And hte purpose of this seems to be advertising her deisgn practice. Encyclopedias don't do that.
DGG ( talk ) 06:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
97198 ( talk) 11:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Hily (app), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispering( t) 02:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:The Art of Elysium Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Primefac ( talk) 21:58, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Hello, E-Stylus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Brooklinen".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj ( 📧) 03:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Amir Marashi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Marashi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Marashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Seasons greetings Stylus. Please note that per WP:PAID and the WMF Terms of Use, editors editing for compensation are required to maintain links to any websites on which they advertise Wikipedia editing services on their userpage. Please ensure that you add these links as soon is convenient. Thanks. SamHolt6 ( talk) 01:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
(copied from Talk"The Art of Elysium):
![]() |
Hi E-Stylus! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, saying : I disagree with the previous reviewer, MurielMary -- Nesheiwat holds an MD, and she comments on medical matters, but a medical journalist with an MD is still a journalist. Shes not apparently notable for her medical research, or her medical practice--- if she is notable for anything, it would be as a journalist.
You cannot show this by references just to her own appearances or presentations. You need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 19:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Hello E-Stylus, can you disclose links to all off-wiki accounts you are using to obtain business to fully comply with the WP:PAID policy? Please do so before making any further edit. Thank you. GSS 💬 10:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you need to disclose this link as requested. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
You have not provided the required links, you have violated WP:PAID, and you're blocked until you comply.Paid editors must also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. If an advertisement is removed, any corresponding links on the Wikipedia user page must remain visible for at least one week.
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our
guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{
unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
at the end of
your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
For avoidance of doubt, I have blocked you specifically for "Failure to provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services, per WP:PAID #How to disclose." and that reason has been recorded in the block log. -- RexxS ( talk) 18:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
"if they choose to arrange their business in such a way that it frustrates those requirements, they will not be allowed to edit here."That's their choice. If each paid editor is allowed to circumvent the requirement to link to their account, then the personation will go unchecked. The community has made clear that that is not an acceptable situation. -- RexxS ( talk) 12:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
"If E-Stylus can demonstrate that they have linked to all of their Upwork accounts that they used to gain the business involved in their paid Wikipedia editing, that would meet our requirements to avoid personation."They need to be showing that are supporting the policy, not attempting to circumvent it as they have been doing so far. -- RexxS ( talk) 15:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
E-Stylus, would you be willing to set your profile to Upwork-users only and provide a link to it? I'm not seeing a viable alternative under the circumstances, and while I agree that you are not currently "advertising" if it is private, that isn't going to be enough to get unblocked. - Bilby ( talk) 16:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
E-Stylus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The block template message for undisclosed paid editing is unwarranted because my paid contributions were previously disclosed on my user page and on associated talk pages in accordance with WP:PAID and the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, Section 4. The additional block reasoning of "Failure to provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services, per WP:PAID #How to disclose" is unwarranted because I have never advertised paid Wikipedia-editing on any websites nor is there any evidence to the contrary. Per my paid contribution disclosures, I have previously contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork, however my account profile is set to private which means it does not display in Upwork's freelancer marketplace or in Google search results. It is only viewable when applying to a job posting. Submitting a proposal to a job posting via a private internet medium does not constitute an advertisement which by definition requires a public medium to promote a product or service.
WP:PAID states in part, "Paid editors must also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. If an advertisement is removed, any corresponding links on the Wikipedia user page must remain visible for at least one week." In turn, my Wikipedia account is in compliance with WP:PAID as I do not advertise paid Wikipedia-editing on any websites. My operation of an Upwork account is not exclusive to Wikipedia work. I have not contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork since September 2019 ( 1, 2).
On 12/28/2019, I responded to an external advertising account inquiry from SamHolt6. After I communicated that my Upwork profile was set to private, there was no response from SamHolt6. On 4/22/2020, I responded to an external advertising account inquiry from GSS. After I cited the relevant WP:PAID policy, GSS contacted administrator Yunshui for "any thoughts". There was no response from Yunshui. On 4/23/2020, administrator Doc James, the initial proposer of the external advertising account policy, advised that I "need[ed] to disclose the link as requested", however the official WP:PAID policy was not addressed. Less than 24 hours later, my account was blocked by administrator RexxS, the closer for the external advertising account RfC. RexxS received a related email from GSS that appears to constitute off-wiki block shopping as there was no report to an on-wiki noticeboard for peer review.
On 4/24/2020, administrator Yunshui proposed amending the wording of the external advertising account policy. If this cross-project policy is not sufficiently clear, my account should not have been blocked prior to a community discussion on potential policy revisions. In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, Section 4 states in part, "Applicable law, or community and Foundation policies and guidelines, such as those addressing conflicts of interest, may further limit paid contributions or require more detailed disclosure. A Wikimedia Project community may adopt an alternative paid contribution disclosure policy. If a Project adopts an alternative disclosure policy, you may comply with that policy instead of the requirements in this section when contributing to that Project. An alternative paid contribution policy will only supersede these requirements if it is approved by the relevant Project community and listed in the alternative disclosure policy page." As of 4/23/2020, the date of my account's block, the external advertising account policy was not listed on the alternative disclosure policies page.
While I understand the community's concerns regarding impersonation on external websites, I have never falsely claimed to own a Wikipedia user account or misrepresented my account standing. A policy that allows administrators to block editors without reviewable evidence leaves considerable room for misuse and abuse of power, specifically if the only current resolution is the disclosure of personally identifiable information. In the RfC for the external advertising account policy, Doc James, the initial proposer stated, "The proposal is not to have accounts here on Wikipedia blocked or banned. The proposal is only to help with removing dishonest advertisements that exist elsewhere." If this is the purpose, there is a potential alternative that would satisfy the community's aim and protect the privacy of compliant paid editors. If an Upwork freelancer disclosed an Upwork assigned contract ID for a completed or existing Wikipedia job, Upwork could review their site's corresponding account profile and confirm with Wikipedia that the editor has not violated either website's Terms of Use. I would be willing to provide a contract ID provided Upwork does not disclose my personally identifiable information and I am copied on all related correspondence between Upwork and Wikipedia. E-Stylus ( talk) 21:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below (chronological order) ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
My understanding of this wording is that if a Project community implements a paid contribution policy that requires more detailed disclosure than the TOU requirements, the policy must be listed on the alternative disclosure policies page to supersede the TOU. I am not attempting to game the system, but rather asking for fair and objective consideration relative to the TOU and community policies. E-Stylus ( talk) 23:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)"These Terms of Use prohibit engaging in deceptive activities, including misrepresentation of affiliation, impersonation, and fraud. As part of these obligations, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. You must make that disclosure in at least one of the following ways: a statement on your user page, a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions. Applicable law, or community and Foundation policies and guidelines, such as those addressing conflicts of interest, may further limit paid contributions or require more detailed disclosure. A Wikimedia Project community may adopt an alternative paid contribution disclosure policy. If a Project adopts an alternative disclosure policy, you may comply with that policy instead of the requirements in this section when contributing to that Project. An alternative paid contribution policy will only supersede these requirements if it is approved by the relevant Project community and listed in the alternative disclosure policy page."
My understanding of this wording is that the expansion of WP:PAID beyond the scope of external advertising accounts would require community consensus that meets the standard of participation for changes to policies."Disclosure of paid contributions to any of the Wikimedia projects is a requirement under the disclosure provision of the Terms of use. Nonetheless, individual projects may create an alternative disclosure policy when their projects or communities have particular needs to either strengthen or reduce the requirements. The provision gives communities discretion to adjust the rules for their specific community after following the project's standard consensus-based process for establishing core policies. Adopting an alternative disclosure policy requires consensus, consistent with the project’s past practice and local understanding of what consensus is. After creating such a policy, projects must include their policy here. This list will help editors and sister projects to quickly discover what the local project policy for paid editing is, or if the default applies."
E-Stylus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please copy this request to WP:AN on my behalf.
Hi - I am seeking your input regarding my unblock request. My account was blocked for "Failure to provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services". Per my paid contribution disclosures, I have previously contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork, however I have never advertised paid Wikipedia-editing services nor is there any evidence to the contrary. My Upwork profile is set to private and is only viewable by prospective clients when submitting a proposal to a job posting. I have not contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork since September 2019 ( 1, 2) and I have never misrepresented my Wikipedia account.
After my account's block, the WP:PAID policy was expanded to require link disclosure for external accounts outside the scope of advertising. The amended policy was implemented by the proposer with 3 votes and 1 comment. It was then retroactively unfairly applied to support the blockage of my account. As the amended policy now requires disclosure of personally identifiable information that is not already public, I am asking that the community review this policy change with a standard of participation that meets the WP:CONSENSUS policy. Also, I am asking that the resulting PAID policy be added to the Wikimedia Foundation's alternative disclosure page with the other local community policies that "strengthen or reduce" the paid disclosure requirements of the Terms of Use. While these procedures may not remedy the questionable blocking of my account, they would at least offer wider consideration and documentation in line with community policies and the Terms of Use. Thank you. E-Stylus ( talk) 02:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your appeal is denied by the community. See AN discussion. -- qedk ( t 愛 c) 16:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have copied it over. 331dot ( talk) 10:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Bilby - Thank you for considering both sides. E-Stylus ( talk) 21:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, E-Stylus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Stefania Skrabak".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, E-Stylus. I just wanted to let you know that
Draft:Landed (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 ( talk) 02:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, E-Stylus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Janette Nesheiwat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 12:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
E-Stylus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Would a Wikipedia editor be willing to copy the below appeal to the appropriate discussion board?
On April 23, 2020, my Wikipedia account was indefinitely blocked for “Failure to provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services, per WP:PAID #How to disclose.” Per my preexisting paid contribution disclosures, I contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork between October 2018 and September 2019. However, due to privacy concerns, my Upwork profile - including nonpublic personal information such as my name, photograph, gender, racial origin, and geographic location - was set to private since the opening of the associated account, and it was only visible to potential clients when applying for a job. After submitting an unblock request on my Wikipedia talk page on April 29, 2020, the WP:PAID #How to disclose policy was amended - beyond the scope of advertising paid Wikipedia-editing services - on April 30, 2020.
As I am no longer utilizing the Upwork platform to contract work (Wikipedia-related or non-Wikipedia), I am seeking reconsideration of my account’s blocking and subsequent site ban. The ban was imposed on May 14, 2020 after an AN discussion among 11 Wikipedia editors. If allowed to rejoin the Wikipedia community, I will continue making every effort to contribute compliant edits that effectively inform readers. Thank you. E-Stylus ( talk) 01:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declined because of WP:SNOWBALL. This is essentially the same request that was previously discussed and declined. If instead you were planning on not engaging in any further paid editing, that would be a different situation and may be worth bringing to the community for discussion. Yamla ( talk) 10:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Isaacl and ProcrastinatingReader: Just a FYI that the current wording of the WP:PAID policy, Disclosing external accounts on Wikipedia, does not reflect the associated Meta cross-project policy regarding linking to external advertising accounts. The English Wikipedia policy was amended from the Meta policy based on a discussion among 5 editors. E-Stylus ( talk) 11:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Vecna Robotics Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 10:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
-- 19:28, Monday, January 8, 2018 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 16:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Musée des Beaux-Arts de Dijon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, E-Stylus!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
20:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 19:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:Hily Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:33, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hily Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Mjs1991 ( talk) 07:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)And hte purpose of this seems to be advertising her deisgn practice. Encyclopedias don't do that.
DGG ( talk ) 06:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
97198 ( talk) 11:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Hily (app), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispering( t) 02:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 12:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:The Art of Elysium Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Primefac ( talk) 21:58, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Hello, E-Stylus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Brooklinen".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj ( 📧) 03:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Amir Marashi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Marashi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Marashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 01:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Seasons greetings Stylus. Please note that per WP:PAID and the WMF Terms of Use, editors editing for compensation are required to maintain links to any websites on which they advertise Wikipedia editing services on their userpage. Please ensure that you add these links as soon is convenient. Thanks. SamHolt6 ( talk) 01:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
(copied from Talk"The Art of Elysium):
![]() |
Hi E-Stylus! You created a thread called Archival by
Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, saying : I disagree with the previous reviewer, MurielMary -- Nesheiwat holds an MD, and she comments on medical matters, but a medical journalist with an MD is still a journalist. Shes not apparently notable for her medical research, or her medical practice--- if she is notable for anything, it would be as a journalist.
You cannot show this by references just to her own appearances or presentations. You need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 19:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Hello E-Stylus, can you disclose links to all off-wiki accounts you are using to obtain business to fully comply with the WP:PAID policy? Please do so before making any further edit. Thank you. GSS 💬 10:25, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you need to disclose this link as requested. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 03:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
You have not provided the required links, you have violated WP:PAID, and you're blocked until you comply.Paid editors must also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. If an advertisement is removed, any corresponding links on the Wikipedia user page must remain visible for at least one week.
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our
guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{
unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
at the end of
your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
For avoidance of doubt, I have blocked you specifically for "Failure to provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services, per WP:PAID #How to disclose." and that reason has been recorded in the block log. -- RexxS ( talk) 18:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
"if they choose to arrange their business in such a way that it frustrates those requirements, they will not be allowed to edit here."That's their choice. If each paid editor is allowed to circumvent the requirement to link to their account, then the personation will go unchecked. The community has made clear that that is not an acceptable situation. -- RexxS ( talk) 12:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
"If E-Stylus can demonstrate that they have linked to all of their Upwork accounts that they used to gain the business involved in their paid Wikipedia editing, that would meet our requirements to avoid personation."They need to be showing that are supporting the policy, not attempting to circumvent it as they have been doing so far. -- RexxS ( talk) 15:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
E-Stylus, would you be willing to set your profile to Upwork-users only and provide a link to it? I'm not seeing a viable alternative under the circumstances, and while I agree that you are not currently "advertising" if it is private, that isn't going to be enough to get unblocked. - Bilby ( talk) 16:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
E-Stylus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The block template message for undisclosed paid editing is unwarranted because my paid contributions were previously disclosed on my user page and on associated talk pages in accordance with WP:PAID and the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, Section 4. The additional block reasoning of "Failure to provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services, per WP:PAID #How to disclose" is unwarranted because I have never advertised paid Wikipedia-editing on any websites nor is there any evidence to the contrary. Per my paid contribution disclosures, I have previously contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork, however my account profile is set to private which means it does not display in Upwork's freelancer marketplace or in Google search results. It is only viewable when applying to a job posting. Submitting a proposal to a job posting via a private internet medium does not constitute an advertisement which by definition requires a public medium to promote a product or service.
WP:PAID states in part, "Paid editors must also provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services. If an advertisement is removed, any corresponding links on the Wikipedia user page must remain visible for at least one week." In turn, my Wikipedia account is in compliance with WP:PAID as I do not advertise paid Wikipedia-editing on any websites. My operation of an Upwork account is not exclusive to Wikipedia work. I have not contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork since September 2019 ( 1, 2).
On 12/28/2019, I responded to an external advertising account inquiry from SamHolt6. After I communicated that my Upwork profile was set to private, there was no response from SamHolt6. On 4/22/2020, I responded to an external advertising account inquiry from GSS. After I cited the relevant WP:PAID policy, GSS contacted administrator Yunshui for "any thoughts". There was no response from Yunshui. On 4/23/2020, administrator Doc James, the initial proposer of the external advertising account policy, advised that I "need[ed] to disclose the link as requested", however the official WP:PAID policy was not addressed. Less than 24 hours later, my account was blocked by administrator RexxS, the closer for the external advertising account RfC. RexxS received a related email from GSS that appears to constitute off-wiki block shopping as there was no report to an on-wiki noticeboard for peer review.
On 4/24/2020, administrator Yunshui proposed amending the wording of the external advertising account policy. If this cross-project policy is not sufficiently clear, my account should not have been blocked prior to a community discussion on potential policy revisions. In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, Section 4 states in part, "Applicable law, or community and Foundation policies and guidelines, such as those addressing conflicts of interest, may further limit paid contributions or require more detailed disclosure. A Wikimedia Project community may adopt an alternative paid contribution disclosure policy. If a Project adopts an alternative disclosure policy, you may comply with that policy instead of the requirements in this section when contributing to that Project. An alternative paid contribution policy will only supersede these requirements if it is approved by the relevant Project community and listed in the alternative disclosure policy page." As of 4/23/2020, the date of my account's block, the external advertising account policy was not listed on the alternative disclosure policies page.
While I understand the community's concerns regarding impersonation on external websites, I have never falsely claimed to own a Wikipedia user account or misrepresented my account standing. A policy that allows administrators to block editors without reviewable evidence leaves considerable room for misuse and abuse of power, specifically if the only current resolution is the disclosure of personally identifiable information. In the RfC for the external advertising account policy, Doc James, the initial proposer stated, "The proposal is not to have accounts here on Wikipedia blocked or banned. The proposal is only to help with removing dishonest advertisements that exist elsewhere." If this is the purpose, there is a potential alternative that would satisfy the community's aim and protect the privacy of compliant paid editors. If an Upwork freelancer disclosed an Upwork assigned contract ID for a completed or existing Wikipedia job, Upwork could review their site's corresponding account profile and confirm with Wikipedia that the editor has not violated either website's Terms of Use. I would be willing to provide a contract ID provided Upwork does not disclose my personally identifiable information and I am copied on all related correspondence between Upwork and Wikipedia. E-Stylus ( talk) 21:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below (chronological order) ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 21:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
My understanding of this wording is that if a Project community implements a paid contribution policy that requires more detailed disclosure than the TOU requirements, the policy must be listed on the alternative disclosure policies page to supersede the TOU. I am not attempting to game the system, but rather asking for fair and objective consideration relative to the TOU and community policies. E-Stylus ( talk) 23:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)"These Terms of Use prohibit engaging in deceptive activities, including misrepresentation of affiliation, impersonation, and fraud. As part of these obligations, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. You must make that disclosure in at least one of the following ways: a statement on your user page, a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions. Applicable law, or community and Foundation policies and guidelines, such as those addressing conflicts of interest, may further limit paid contributions or require more detailed disclosure. A Wikimedia Project community may adopt an alternative paid contribution disclosure policy. If a Project adopts an alternative disclosure policy, you may comply with that policy instead of the requirements in this section when contributing to that Project. An alternative paid contribution policy will only supersede these requirements if it is approved by the relevant Project community and listed in the alternative disclosure policy page."
My understanding of this wording is that the expansion of WP:PAID beyond the scope of external advertising accounts would require community consensus that meets the standard of participation for changes to policies."Disclosure of paid contributions to any of the Wikimedia projects is a requirement under the disclosure provision of the Terms of use. Nonetheless, individual projects may create an alternative disclosure policy when their projects or communities have particular needs to either strengthen or reduce the requirements. The provision gives communities discretion to adjust the rules for their specific community after following the project's standard consensus-based process for establishing core policies. Adopting an alternative disclosure policy requires consensus, consistent with the project’s past practice and local understanding of what consensus is. After creating such a policy, projects must include their policy here. This list will help editors and sister projects to quickly discover what the local project policy for paid editing is, or if the default applies."
E-Stylus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Please copy this request to WP:AN on my behalf.
Hi - I am seeking your input regarding my unblock request. My account was blocked for "Failure to provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services". Per my paid contribution disclosures, I have previously contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork, however I have never advertised paid Wikipedia-editing services nor is there any evidence to the contrary. My Upwork profile is set to private and is only viewable by prospective clients when submitting a proposal to a job posting. I have not contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork since September 2019 ( 1, 2) and I have never misrepresented my Wikipedia account.
After my account's block, the WP:PAID policy was expanded to require link disclosure for external accounts outside the scope of advertising. The amended policy was implemented by the proposer with 3 votes and 1 comment. It was then retroactively unfairly applied to support the blockage of my account. As the amended policy now requires disclosure of personally identifiable information that is not already public, I am asking that the community review this policy change with a standard of participation that meets the WP:CONSENSUS policy. Also, I am asking that the resulting PAID policy be added to the Wikimedia Foundation's alternative disclosure page with the other local community policies that "strengthen or reduce" the paid disclosure requirements of the Terms of Use. While these procedures may not remedy the questionable blocking of my account, they would at least offer wider consideration and documentation in line with community policies and the Terms of Use. Thank you. E-Stylus ( talk) 02:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your appeal is denied by the community. See AN discussion. -- qedk ( t 愛 c) 16:40, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have copied it over. 331dot ( talk) 10:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Bilby - Thank you for considering both sides. E-Stylus ( talk) 21:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, E-Stylus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Stefania Skrabak".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:05, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, E-Stylus. I just wanted to let you know that
Draft:Landed (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 ( talk) 02:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, E-Stylus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Janette Nesheiwat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 12:03, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
E-Stylus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Would a Wikipedia editor be willing to copy the below appeal to the appropriate discussion board?
On April 23, 2020, my Wikipedia account was indefinitely blocked for “Failure to provide links on their Wikipedia user page to all active accounts at websites where they advertise paid Wikipedia-editing services, per WP:PAID #How to disclose.” Per my preexisting paid contribution disclosures, I contracted Wikipedia work via Upwork between October 2018 and September 2019. However, due to privacy concerns, my Upwork profile - including nonpublic personal information such as my name, photograph, gender, racial origin, and geographic location - was set to private since the opening of the associated account, and it was only visible to potential clients when applying for a job. After submitting an unblock request on my Wikipedia talk page on April 29, 2020, the WP:PAID #How to disclose policy was amended - beyond the scope of advertising paid Wikipedia-editing services - on April 30, 2020.
As I am no longer utilizing the Upwork platform to contract work (Wikipedia-related or non-Wikipedia), I am seeking reconsideration of my account’s blocking and subsequent site ban. The ban was imposed on May 14, 2020 after an AN discussion among 11 Wikipedia editors. If allowed to rejoin the Wikipedia community, I will continue making every effort to contribute compliant edits that effectively inform readers. Thank you. E-Stylus ( talk) 01:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Declined because of WP:SNOWBALL. This is essentially the same request that was previously discussed and declined. If instead you were planning on not engaging in any further paid editing, that would be a different situation and may be worth bringing to the community for discussion. Yamla ( talk) 10:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Isaacl and ProcrastinatingReader: Just a FYI that the current wording of the WP:PAID policy, Disclosing external accounts on Wikipedia, does not reflect the associated Meta cross-project policy regarding linking to external advertising accounts. The English Wikipedia policy was amended from the Meta policy based on a discussion among 5 editors. E-Stylus ( talk) 11:16, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Vecna Robotics Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 10:27, 24 May 2022 (UTC)