This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Please see the talk page regarding your Original Research statement on the Generation Z page. Thank you. 2606:6000:610A:9000:7145:1EF9:F87F:4DF9 ( talk) 15:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
How can I address disruptive IP edits? I notice the page Generation Z was previously restricted so that only auto-confirmed users could edit there. That restriction was recently lifted and there has been a string of disruptive edits from multiple IPs and new accounts.-- DynaGirl ( talk) 00:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ElectraWoman&DynaGirl.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DYKWYCA.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello DynaGirl, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Generation Z has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 01:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I added it because the majority say a millennial is from 1980-2000 but if generation z is 1995-present then that doesn't make sense the reason for the Gen Y/Z cusp is because 1995-1999 are apart of both generations but mostly apart of generation. While those born after 2000 are most definetly generation z. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.24.93.190 ( talk) 16:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
I am reverting it for reasons. 1.To keep things up to date 2.Trying to get the feel of things as i'm new here. 3.I make mistakes. 4.There is still disagreement on the range. 5. Its too early to define gen z so early 2000s for now since millennials last from 1980 to early 2000s. 6. I want my privacy. 7. I am not aware of all the rules. 8. I want to keep things accurate. 9. I don't know my account name since its too lomg to remember and i just use Ip adress. 10. Want to make the reader understand such subjects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.24.93.190 ( talk) 14:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
In the lead section of the Millennials article, can you change "ending dates ranging from the mid-1990s to early 2000s" to "ending dates ranging from the mid-1990s to MID-2000s"? Strauss and Howe consider the Millennials to end in 2004 (a mid 00s year), and I've seen many demographers and researchers go with their '82-'04 figure.
Also, the Gen Z article says "mid-1990s to mid-2000s as starting birth years", so I think the Millennial article should be put "in line" with the Gen Z article.-- 98.237.40.132 ( talk) 22:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Your reply was undone due to spam. {Wikiman8999} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiman8999 ( talk • contribs) 21:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, DynaGirl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, DynaGirl. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MaxBrowne ( talk) 01:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi DynaGirl, please stop WP:Edit warring on Special snowflake and see the talk page. Thanks. MHP Huck ( talk) 04:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | ||
For finding sources about, and general work on, Snowflakes. Yintan 14:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC) |
Please see the closure of the complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You may be blocked if you make any further revert that does not have a prior talk page consensus. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 05:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
Please see the talk page regarding your Original Research statement on the Generation Z page. Thank you. 2606:6000:610A:9000:7145:1EF9:F87F:4DF9 ( talk) 15:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
How can I address disruptive IP edits? I notice the page Generation Z was previously restricted so that only auto-confirmed users could edit there. That restriction was recently lifted and there has been a string of disruptive edits from multiple IPs and new accounts.-- DynaGirl ( talk) 00:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ElectraWoman&DynaGirl.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DYKWYCA.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello DynaGirl, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Generation Z has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 01:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I added it because the majority say a millennial is from 1980-2000 but if generation z is 1995-present then that doesn't make sense the reason for the Gen Y/Z cusp is because 1995-1999 are apart of both generations but mostly apart of generation. While those born after 2000 are most definetly generation z. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.24.93.190 ( talk) 16:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
I am reverting it for reasons. 1.To keep things up to date 2.Trying to get the feel of things as i'm new here. 3.I make mistakes. 4.There is still disagreement on the range. 5. Its too early to define gen z so early 2000s for now since millennials last from 1980 to early 2000s. 6. I want my privacy. 7. I am not aware of all the rules. 8. I want to keep things accurate. 9. I don't know my account name since its too lomg to remember and i just use Ip adress. 10. Want to make the reader understand such subjects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.24.93.190 ( talk) 14:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
In the lead section of the Millennials article, can you change "ending dates ranging from the mid-1990s to early 2000s" to "ending dates ranging from the mid-1990s to MID-2000s"? Strauss and Howe consider the Millennials to end in 2004 (a mid 00s year), and I've seen many demographers and researchers go with their '82-'04 figure.
Also, the Gen Z article says "mid-1990s to mid-2000s as starting birth years", so I think the Millennial article should be put "in line" with the Gen Z article.-- 98.237.40.132 ( talk) 22:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Your reply was undone due to spam. {Wikiman8999} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiman8999 ( talk • contribs) 21:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, DynaGirl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, DynaGirl. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MaxBrowne ( talk) 01:37, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi DynaGirl, please stop WP:Edit warring on Special snowflake and see the talk page. Thanks. MHP Huck ( talk) 04:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | ||
For finding sources about, and general work on, Snowflakes. Yintan 14:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC) |
Please see the closure of the complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You may be blocked if you make any further revert that does not have a prior talk page consensus. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 05:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC)