Hi, there is a removal discussion going on about the List of HIV-positive people. Since you commented on the candidacy and List of brain tumor patients might have the same issues your input would be welcome. Garion96 (talk) 09:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
The Bellwether account was opened a bit after I vanished. I had vanished due to RL concerns that are no longer a problem. Thus, on the advice of an administrator I'm friendly with, I was redirecting both my talk and my userpage to the page of my formerly vanished account. Is that a problem in some way? BobTheTomato (MrWhich) ( talk) 12:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
I've nom'd myself here: User:Durova/Triple_crown_winner's_circle/Nominations#Rlevse. If you have questions or need more info, let me know. I think this is a great program. SteveCrossin turned me onto it. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Can you clear these questions up for me? TomStar81 ( Talk) 23:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Dear Durova, could you please note the request and my response at User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles#Userbox? As I said, I feel somewhat conflicted there and would appreciate your thoughts. Sincerely, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Tally-ho! 02:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Suddenly we're filling a gap in the weekly Signpost Dispatch section with an article on Featured Sounds, and I'll have to do it within a day. I'm contacting several people on the history page, you among them, who might be able to review the draft (I hope it will be written in about 12 hours' time). Can you suggest anyone else? Do you know anyone who's been around from the start, who might know more about the history of the page? I guess I can find it via the edit histories. TONY (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Durova, I've seen you nominated a video clip to be considered as FP. I wonder, if I could nominate one of my personal video clips at Wikipedia FP too. Thank you.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 01:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
At this discussion of the place of AGF Challenge exercises and similar exercises as part of RfA here.-- Filll ( talk | wpc) 17:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova, sorry to bother you if you're on a break now, but I was wondering if you might take a look at some new evidence I presented at the Giovanni33 ArbCom case (see here). You've commented there but have basically been neutral, and I know you no small experience in these sockpuppet cases. If you're too busy or just don't want to get any deeper involved in a tedious case then no worries.-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 01:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
So, do you think we'll do the right thing this time? -- Rocksanddirt ( talk) 07:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
I think this idea you've raised about transcluding blocked users' talk pages to their AN/I threads in certain cases is a pretty good one, just stopping by to cheer you up with that opinion! Have a nice day! -- tiny plastic Grey Knight ⊖ 10:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
"Common sense says the camel's back has broken, and we can put our straws to better use sipping lemonade as we return to building the encyclopedia." Laughed out loud. :-) ATren ( talk) 15:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Douglas MacArthur lands Leyte1.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 1, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-01. howcheng { chat} 00:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
A group of editors has been working together on Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate) and related articles for years to preserve highly biased articles like this BLP. Some intervention from a high level may be needed. They seem to prefer a hatchet job to presenting the facts in a neutral manner. They work together to oppose reasonable attempts to make the articles NPOV, seeming to be uninterested in other viewpoints, or in attempts to point out statements in the articles that are not supported by the citations, etc. These editors coordinate using power plays to enforce the over-the-top version they like. Critics' perspectives are presented as core material (even in the introduction), claims are made which go beyond even what a critic said in a source, etc. It's the best example I know of perhaps Wikipedia's main weakness - articles at the fringes of Wikipedia are sometimes so far from NPOV that they are absurd and disgraceful, because not enough neutral people care enough about them to make them decent. -Exucmember (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could recommend what revision I should keep as the protected one? · AndonicO Engage. 13:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:AlfredPalmerM3tank1942b.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 3, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-03. howcheng { chat} 22:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:SanFrancisco1851a.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 5, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-05. howcheng { chat} 05:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
Image:Brandeisl.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
MER-C
07:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
|
The
May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
00:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't find it anymore, but at one time there was a "second chance" procedure whereby an editor who has blocked for more than a year could ask for a second chance. The template {{ Second_chance}} still exists, but it is only useful to editors whose talk page hasn't been protected.
Here's something that might work: Have a bot that:
For people who are blocked for non-global reasons, such as edit warring on particular articles, letting them come back sooner with parole restrictions is a lot more sensible. Arbcom should do this as a matter of routine.
davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 02:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear Durova, following an exchange at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tanthalas39 2#Oppose, another editor has requested I seek out your opinion at User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles#hm. You'll note that as I indicated many times editors have been positively influenced by my opinions in RfAs and I am not sure how to take criticism from an account that has been warned a few times for unconstructive RfA participation, especially when in this most recent instance, the candidate responded maturely to my weak oppose and had I just received that reply, I probably would have switched my stance by now. Anyway, for the other RfAs in which that user and I participated, please see: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pegship, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ddstretch, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xenocidic, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Enigmaman, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dihydrogen Monoxide 3, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Huntster, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Vivio Testarossa, Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Avraham 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Coppertwig, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/WBOSITG 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Naerii, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Daniel J. Leivick, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Philosopher, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Peteforsyth, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Thingg, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/MilborneOne, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyclonenim, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/VanTucky 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The Transhumanist 5, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/R. Baley, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/EyeSerene, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lawrence Cohen, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BirgitteSB, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Martijn Hoekstra, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Martijn Hoekstra, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Blueboy96 3, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/OverlordQ, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Abd 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Seresin, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Seresin, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/John Carter, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rudget 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aqwis, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TenPoundHammer 4, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Michael Greiner, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SatyrTN, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Blueboy96 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Captain panda 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dfrg.msc 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cobi, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Arkyan2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Navou 3, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/WODUP, and Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TenPoundHammer 2. You'll notice that I offer a number of reasons for supporting and opposing candidates and that I generally remain open-minded to changing my stance as the discussion progresses. You'll also note that I never swear or launch personal attacks on those I disagree with. So, I am seriously not sure if it this point I should just be ignoring that one user or what and appreciate any feedback. Best, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Tally-ho! 06:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Would you both be willing to have a discussion by gmail chat or Skype? I could mediate. Durova Charge! 23:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I respect both of you, for different reasons and in different ways, and hope there's a venue or means that could bring you together harmoniously. Skype appears unlikely to work out. Would you consider formal mediation? Durova Charge! 07:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
For your well-written comments at the RCC FAC. I had been been searching for a graceful way to make those very points. I had succeeded earlier, but the re-start did not help me find grace this time. -- Relata refero ( disp.) 09:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I plan to do some more photo uploads to work on the Kodiak article later this summer. Right now I have photos on some pages of Wikipedia but they could be improved, I would like to keep your name for possible advice in the future if thats ok with you? NancyHeise ( talk) 22:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Waldenburg1945edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 10, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-10. howcheng { chat} 22:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi again,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Capitol1846.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 11, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-11. howcheng { chat} 23:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up - I hadn't caught the comment, although I saw the AfD participation. I think I will sit this one out and just watch, unless I am further implicated / accused. And, for those who watch such things, I have never communicated off wiki with Durova, and am responding to a notice that I was mentioned in an requ for arbitration.
You seem to get dragged into these sorts of conflicts with some regularity, and to always handle yourself with poise. I hope this gets worked out. Pastordavid ( talk) 13:30, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
I'd be happy to help out with the cleanup. I've actually already started, but have only had a quick once-over to remove some of the worst black spots and a wrinkle (I prefer removing the same kind of problem throughout the whole picture to working intensively on one area). If you've had a chance to do significant work, I'm willing to ditch mine and work with yours. TBH, after working on it a bit, I'm not 100% sure it's worth it (i.e. the end result still might not be great), but I enjoy the challenge. :-) I prefer not to put my email addy in my profile, but you can reach me here, on my talk page, or at mderes1224 at rogers dot com. Matt Deres ( talk) 14:24, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Let me know if I can be of assistance too, I am busy the next few days but then I have a few days of downtime. Mfield ( talk) 14:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Go ahead, you can forward it to me. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 16:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
This message is being sent to all opposers of the Roman Catholic Church FAC. Thank you for taking the time to come see the page and give us your comments. I apologize for any drama caused by my imperfect human nature. As specified in WP:FAC, I am required to encourage you to come see the page and decide if your oppose still stands. Ceoil and others have made changes to prose and many edits have been made to address FAC reviewers comments like yours. Thank you. NancyHeise ( talk) 23:54, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear Durova, I tried to have a reasonable discussion with user Cush about his use of the phrase "Jew Crew," explaining myself in full, but it seems he has no respect for the point of view that Jews should not be universally grouped as nationalist fanatics. See the Jerusalem talk page as well as Cush's talk page. Do you know what to do about hate speech? Can you tell me how to address this? Thanks, LamaLoLeshLa ( talk) 03:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Durova, could you please unblock Potential superpowers. That dispute on the talk page has been resolved and a new improved, better sourced ediition has been created and is waiting to be added to the page. Full unprotection or semii-protection would both work well. There is simply no need for the protection, as things have simmered down. -- Hobie Hunter ( talk) 17:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#Pedrito's interest in Jaakobu -- Avi ( talk) 12:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, there is a removal discussion going on about the List of HIV-positive people. Since you commented on the candidacy and List of brain tumor patients might have the same issues your input would be welcome. Garion96 (talk) 09:32, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
The Bellwether account was opened a bit after I vanished. I had vanished due to RL concerns that are no longer a problem. Thus, on the advice of an administrator I'm friendly with, I was redirecting both my talk and my userpage to the page of my formerly vanished account. Is that a problem in some way? BobTheTomato (MrWhich) ( talk) 12:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
I've nom'd myself here: User:Durova/Triple_crown_winner's_circle/Nominations#Rlevse. If you have questions or need more info, let me know. I think this is a great program. SteveCrossin turned me onto it. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Can you clear these questions up for me? TomStar81 ( Talk) 23:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Dear Durova, could you please note the request and my response at User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles#Userbox? As I said, I feel somewhat conflicted there and would appreciate your thoughts. Sincerely, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Tally-ho! 02:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Suddenly we're filling a gap in the weekly Signpost Dispatch section with an article on Featured Sounds, and I'll have to do it within a day. I'm contacting several people on the history page, you among them, who might be able to review the draft (I hope it will be written in about 12 hours' time). Can you suggest anyone else? Do you know anyone who's been around from the start, who might know more about the history of the page? I guess I can find it via the edit histories. TONY (talk) 04:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Durova, I've seen you nominated a video clip to be considered as FP. I wonder, if I could nominate one of my personal video clips at Wikipedia FP too. Thank you.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 01:40, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
At this discussion of the place of AGF Challenge exercises and similar exercises as part of RfA here.-- Filll ( talk | wpc) 17:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova, sorry to bother you if you're on a break now, but I was wondering if you might take a look at some new evidence I presented at the Giovanni33 ArbCom case (see here). You've commented there but have basically been neutral, and I know you no small experience in these sockpuppet cases. If you're too busy or just don't want to get any deeper involved in a tedious case then no worries.-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 01:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
So, do you think we'll do the right thing this time? -- Rocksanddirt ( talk) 07:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
I think this idea you've raised about transcluding blocked users' talk pages to their AN/I threads in certain cases is a pretty good one, just stopping by to cheer you up with that opinion! Have a nice day! -- tiny plastic Grey Knight ⊖ 10:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
"Common sense says the camel's back has broken, and we can put our straws to better use sipping lemonade as we return to building the encyclopedia." Laughed out loud. :-) ATren ( talk) 15:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Douglas MacArthur lands Leyte1.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 1, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-01. howcheng { chat} 00:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
A group of editors has been working together on Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate) and related articles for years to preserve highly biased articles like this BLP. Some intervention from a high level may be needed. They seem to prefer a hatchet job to presenting the facts in a neutral manner. They work together to oppose reasonable attempts to make the articles NPOV, seeming to be uninterested in other viewpoints, or in attempts to point out statements in the articles that are not supported by the citations, etc. These editors coordinate using power plays to enforce the over-the-top version they like. Critics' perspectives are presented as core material (even in the introduction), claims are made which go beyond even what a critic said in a source, etc. It's the best example I know of perhaps Wikipedia's main weakness - articles at the fringes of Wikipedia are sometimes so far from NPOV that they are absurd and disgraceful, because not enough neutral people care enough about them to make them decent. -Exucmember (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could recommend what revision I should keep as the protected one? · AndonicO Engage. 13:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:AlfredPalmerM3tank1942b.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 3, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-03. howcheng { chat} 22:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:SanFrancisco1851a.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 5, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-05. howcheng { chat} 05:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
Image:Brandeisl.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.
MER-C
07:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
|
The
May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
00:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
I can't find it anymore, but at one time there was a "second chance" procedure whereby an editor who has blocked for more than a year could ask for a second chance. The template {{ Second_chance}} still exists, but it is only useful to editors whose talk page hasn't been protected.
Here's something that might work: Have a bot that:
For people who are blocked for non-global reasons, such as edit warring on particular articles, letting them come back sooner with parole restrictions is a lot more sensible. Arbcom should do this as a matter of routine.
davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 02:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear Durova, following an exchange at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Tanthalas39 2#Oppose, another editor has requested I seek out your opinion at User talk:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles#hm. You'll note that as I indicated many times editors have been positively influenced by my opinions in RfAs and I am not sure how to take criticism from an account that has been warned a few times for unconstructive RfA participation, especially when in this most recent instance, the candidate responded maturely to my weak oppose and had I just received that reply, I probably would have switched my stance by now. Anyway, for the other RfAs in which that user and I participated, please see: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pegship, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ddstretch, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xenocidic, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Enigmaman, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dihydrogen Monoxide 3, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Huntster, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Vivio Testarossa, Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Avraham 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Coppertwig, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/WBOSITG 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Naerii, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Daniel J. Leivick, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Philosopher, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Peteforsyth, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Thingg, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/MilborneOne, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyclonenim, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/VanTucky 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The Transhumanist 5, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/R. Baley, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/EyeSerene, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lawrence Cohen, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/BirgitteSB, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Martijn Hoekstra, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Martijn Hoekstra, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Blueboy96 3, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/OverlordQ, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Abd 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Seresin, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Seresin, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/John Carter, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rudget 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Aqwis, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TenPoundHammer 4, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Michael Greiner, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SatyrTN, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Blueboy96 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Captain panda 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dfrg.msc 2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cobi, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Arkyan2, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Navou 3, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/WODUP, and Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/TenPoundHammer 2. You'll notice that I offer a number of reasons for supporting and opposing candidates and that I generally remain open-minded to changing my stance as the discussion progresses. You'll also note that I never swear or launch personal attacks on those I disagree with. So, I am seriously not sure if it this point I should just be ignoring that one user or what and appreciate any feedback. Best, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Tally-ho! 06:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Would you both be willing to have a discussion by gmail chat or Skype? I could mediate. Durova Charge! 23:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I respect both of you, for different reasons and in different ways, and hope there's a venue or means that could bring you together harmoniously. Skype appears unlikely to work out. Would you consider formal mediation? Durova Charge! 07:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
For your well-written comments at the RCC FAC. I had been been searching for a graceful way to make those very points. I had succeeded earlier, but the re-start did not help me find grace this time. -- Relata refero ( disp.) 09:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I plan to do some more photo uploads to work on the Kodiak article later this summer. Right now I have photos on some pages of Wikipedia but they could be improved, I would like to keep your name for possible advice in the future if thats ok with you? NancyHeise ( talk) 22:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Durova,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Waldenburg1945edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 10, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-10. howcheng { chat} 22:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi again,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Capitol1846.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 11, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-11. howcheng { chat} 23:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up - I hadn't caught the comment, although I saw the AfD participation. I think I will sit this one out and just watch, unless I am further implicated / accused. And, for those who watch such things, I have never communicated off wiki with Durova, and am responding to a notice that I was mentioned in an requ for arbitration.
You seem to get dragged into these sorts of conflicts with some regularity, and to always handle yourself with poise. I hope this gets worked out. Pastordavid ( talk) 13:30, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
I'd be happy to help out with the cleanup. I've actually already started, but have only had a quick once-over to remove some of the worst black spots and a wrinkle (I prefer removing the same kind of problem throughout the whole picture to working intensively on one area). If you've had a chance to do significant work, I'm willing to ditch mine and work with yours. TBH, after working on it a bit, I'm not 100% sure it's worth it (i.e. the end result still might not be great), but I enjoy the challenge. :-) I prefer not to put my email addy in my profile, but you can reach me here, on my talk page, or at mderes1224 at rogers dot com. Matt Deres ( talk) 14:24, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Let me know if I can be of assistance too, I am busy the next few days but then I have a few days of downtime. Mfield ( talk) 14:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Go ahead, you can forward it to me. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 16:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
This message is being sent to all opposers of the Roman Catholic Church FAC. Thank you for taking the time to come see the page and give us your comments. I apologize for any drama caused by my imperfect human nature. As specified in WP:FAC, I am required to encourage you to come see the page and decide if your oppose still stands. Ceoil and others have made changes to prose and many edits have been made to address FAC reviewers comments like yours. Thank you. NancyHeise ( talk) 23:54, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Dear Durova, I tried to have a reasonable discussion with user Cush about his use of the phrase "Jew Crew," explaining myself in full, but it seems he has no respect for the point of view that Jews should not be universally grouped as nationalist fanatics. See the Jerusalem talk page as well as Cush's talk page. Do you know what to do about hate speech? Can you tell me how to address this? Thanks, LamaLoLeshLa ( talk) 03:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey Durova, could you please unblock Potential superpowers. That dispute on the talk page has been resolved and a new improved, better sourced ediition has been created and is waiting to be added to the page. Full unprotection or semii-protection would both work well. There is simply no need for the protection, as things have simmered down. -- Hobie Hunter ( talk) 17:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#Pedrito's interest in Jaakobu -- Avi ( talk) 12:28, 11 June 2008 (UTC)