![]() | This is an
archive of past discussions for the period March 2014 through February 2015. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Please don't take this as a complaint, either "you're slow" or "you're making a mess" or anything else — I'm just bringing this up in case you have the chance to work on it at some point. Nyttend ( talk) 21:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Another Virginia anomaly for you. The (two) listings for the independent city of Norton, Virginia were combined with those of surrounding Wise County, Virginia. I have separated the two in National Register of Historic Places listings in Wise County, Virginia (and redirected National Register of Historic Places listings in Norton, Virginia there, away from National Register of Historic Places listings in Virginia), but your files or the script may need updating. (N.B. the other zero listing in Virginia, Poquoson, Virginia, is surrounded by York County, but seems to actually not have any listings at this time.) Magic ♪piano 17:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
It's simply that these images skew the statistics, making it seem as if we've gotten photos at sites for which we have nothing. Vaguely comparable to putting together a stub on an MPS and then using it in place of links to nonexistent articles, e.g. how List of the 1733 Spanish Plate Fleet Shipwrecks is linked at National Register of Historic Places listings in Monroe County, Florida. Someone could even pad the stats by writing a slightly nonstub MPS article just to save effort on sites with documentation and link it, e.g. hitting "undo" on this edit; for practical purposes, it's no different from adding these image links. Nyttend ( talk) 03:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
I just saw your WT:NRHP discussion with Orlady regarding the Jesse Whitesell House and Farm. As the photographer for the images currently in the article, I can tell you that it's rather confusing on the ground, too; I wasn't quite clear what I should photograph in order to get elements of both the original and the increase. If I correctly understand your words, I agree with what you've said: although it was originally located just in Kentucky, it needs to be listed as a duplicate because the increase causes the listing to include resources on both sides of the border. Nyttend ( talk) 04:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm posting this here because I didn't want to write it twice on each of your talk pages haha, and I didn't want to bother the entire project just to talk to you two, User:Nyttend and User:TheCatalyst31 (I'm hoping that ping will alert you to this?). The reason I only want to talk to you two is because you're the only other people I've seen occasionally use the progress script to update the Progress page. I've been working for the past day or two on an update to the script which uses a different method to scrape the data from the county lists than before and in turn dramatically speeds up the process. Instead of taking (on my slow connection) roughly 2-2.5 hours, I now consistently get runs of about 45-50 minutes, and I expect them to be even faster when I go back next week to my faster connection.
I'm still not convinced that I have worked all the bugs out, though, so I haven't actually edited the progress script with these changes. The current test code is at User:Dudemanfellabra/Sandbox.js and the output is at User:Dudemanfellabra/Sandbox. Comparing that output to what's currently on the Progress page (made convenient by this dif), they roughly match, although there are some small differences. Some of those differences are due to the fact that the updates are 3 days apart, and one would expect there to be differences due to new article creation, etc., but some I believe due to the magnitude of them (i.e. the total number of listed sites in the entire country dropped by ~100) are due to the different approaches to the code. I am beginning to look through to compare the data to what the NRHPstats script outputs on the individual county lists as well as what I can manually tabulate, but I figured three sets of eyes is better than one. Would either/both of you care to help me look over this?
To be honest, I'm actually more inclined to trust this newer data because of the new way I handle in-county duplications, but the new code uses some complicated regular expressions to extract the data from the wikitext whereas before I was just using the processed HTML (the processing of which was what led to the long wait time), so maybe those regex's miss some listings that the old code doesn't? One possible reason would be hard-coded table rows, which my new code wouldn't catch (it only looks for transclusions of {{ NRHP row}}). Those shouldn't exist, though, because if they did, my bot would (in theory) catch them and report them as having no refnum on the county list since that was only introduced recently via the row template. The thing I don't like is that the number of total sites reported by the new code is lower than what's given on United States National Register of Historic Places listings, which I trust to be the most accurate of the three numbers. Then again, this may be due to the newly generated duplicates differing in many states to what was on the Progress page before automation, which was usually just a copy and paste extension of what was on the relevant state list.
If I can get this working in an acceptable manner, I'll hopefully apply the same technique to the bot code itself. Currently that code takes anywhere from 5-7 hours depending on my connection to run, so I would expect to at least shave an hour or so off of that. Most of that time, though, is spent querying individual pages to see if they need to be tagged with NRIS-only, so that won't be sped up at all. Either way, some improvement is better than none, so I'll take it! Thanks for you guys' continuous help!-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 21:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
@ TheCatalyst31: Sorry for the long silence, but last week at school was pretty gruelling (getting down to the end of the semester now), and I haven't had time to do anything until now. I'm still trying to figure out any differences between my new code and the old code, and the next major difference I find is Coconino County, Arizona, which shows on the Progress page as 25 stubs, 39 Start+ (which matches the NRHPstats script for me) and in my sandbox as 35 stubs, 29 Start+. I made a manual table like the one above for this county below:
As you can see, this matches the new code instead of the old one, leading me to believe the new code is better. I think what happened is the old code took the 11-time duplicated Lookout trees article and mistakenly counted it as Start+. The new code does a better job at the article titles attached to their ratings by looping through an array each time a rating is queried instead of assuming elements are going to line up. With this bit of evidence, I'm now willing to say the new code is superior to the old code, both in speed and in accuracy. I'm going to copy it in and run it now.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 15:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm not absolutely sure that your edit is responsible, but either this edit or something else is causing embedded NRHP infoboxes to be misaligned—they're being treated as entries in the wrapping infoboxes, left-aligning with the text of the other entries rather than with the labels (or headings, if you will) of the entries. See, for instance, the example under " Embedding" at the template page. Could you look into this? Deor ( talk) 11:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Is it really a good thing that we're going to get Tripling Elephants on the Late Show? Be ready for a repeat of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elephant (wikipedia article) and related Colberrorism :-) Nyttend backup ( talk) 21:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
While tagging some untagged articles, I came across this article, which should have been tagged as NRIS-only but wasn't. Do you have any idea how the bot skipped that one? TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 09:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. For a number of reasons, most recently my recent trip to China, I haven't been able to work on NRHP articles in a few weeks, but I eventually do plan to get back to them. Daniel Case ( talk) 16:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Before I noticed your last message I tried it in Firefox: File:NRHP_Firefox_scriptoutput.jpg Agathoclea ( talk) 19:10, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Uncaught ReferenceError: jsonObject is not defined
I found the culprit script User:AzaToth/morebits.js resulting in an error on line 93
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'replace' of undefined
Just wondering what I was using it for. Agathoclea ( talk) 20:29, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'scrollIntoView' of undefined
line 152 when running on National Register of Historic Places listings in Carbon County, Pennsylvania Agathoclea ( talk) 20:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
commons:Category:Longmire Buildings only showed for its second id not for the first one. (To test you will need to revert two edits of mine) Agathoclea ( talk) 22:57, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'scrollIntoView' of undefined
|uid=#######
instead of |refnum=########
. I'll make it recognize which one we're looking at based on the title of the page and adjust itself accordingly. That might take some time, though, as during the week I have class and have to focus on it, especially since it's now the end of the semester, and my professors have piled the work on top of me. I'm a few weeks away from getting my Master's, so after May 2, I should have tons more time to devote to this. Thanks for the suggestion! I didn't realize there were other setups like this. If there are any more like these two, I can probably incorporate them as well, making this a universal script. Thanks again!--
Dudemanfellabra (
talk)
13:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Another oddity: National Register of Historic Places listings in Middlesex County, Connecticut has a former listing that shows a category to be added. But it does not get saved neither can I see an error in the console. As for my ideas: I think I will put them on the talkpage of the script to kepp this page uncluttered. It might take me just as long as I have some leave next week which I plan to spend away from the keyboard. Agathoclea ( talk) 22:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Agathoclea: I've just updated the script to be able to handle listed buildings in England and ran it on all of the pages listed here. In the process I also made it compatible with listed buildings in Wales, although I don't believe the bot has output any lists of missing links for Wales (correct me if I'm wrong). I ran it on Grade I listed buildings in Conwy County Borough and found a few missing links, which I let the script add. Could you perhaps try to find more missing in Wales somewhere? If it doesn't work, let me know. Now that I have the extension ready, it is relatively straightforward to extend it to most if not all of these categories. The first on the list would be the rest of the listed buildings in the UK. If that is desired, I can probably do it. Just let me know!-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 00:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I have now added the functionality to find and add matching images to lists. I tested it with an NRHP page and a Nepali page and got satisfactory results. I can't at present think of a way around the major time increase, but if I do, I'll try to shrink it as much as possible. As always, let me know if you find anything that doesn't work.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 03:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
@ Agathoclea: I just modified the script again to get around the long download time at the beginning. Instead of downloading the entirety of Commons data, I now construct a category/file sortkey (the thing {{ DEFAULTSORT}} speficies) from the ID in the table row and only query to see if there are matches with that. Now each row takes a second or so to query before moving on to the next instead of the instantaneous jump as before. Now, though, there is no wait at the beginning to get started, so it's a trade-off kind of thing. For places like Nepal with very few categories on Commons this might actually increase the time it takes to run the script, but for registers like the NRHP with many thousands of files, it speeds up the process tremendously. This will make things better in the long run, too, when more and more files/categories are ID'd on Commons. Let me know how you like the change and also as usual if you find any errors.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 08:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
"nice script" Agathoclea ( talk) 18:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, that will be interesting. I will try and look a litte bit closer tonicht, but so far I noticed two things. The editsummary is not crosswiki-safe and I have run into a possible script conflict again like at the beginnng. It gets stuck at "Checking for matches...". I will try and identify the culprit tonight. Agathoclea ( talk) 08:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
"EditSummary":"[[en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Semi-automated]] addition of image(s) and/or commonscat link(s) to monument list",
"EditSummary":"[[:en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Semi-automated]] addition of image(s) and/or commonscat link(s) to monument list",
"EditSummary":"[[:en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Halbautomatisches]] hinzufügen von Bildern und/oder Commonskategorien zur Denkmalliste",
// The strings "ROWTEMPLATE", "NAME", "CATNAME", etc. should not be translated but can be moved around for better grammar. // These strings will be replaced by the relevant items during output. // text to be displayed in the button you click to start the script "ButtonText":"Check Commons for images and categories", // Error at the beginning of the script to catch templates that don't include the correct CSS class "RowMismatch":"Row mismatch! This is probably due to an incorrectly formatted row template. All row templates must include class='vcard' in order for this script to identify them. If {{ROWTEMPLATE}} does include class='vcard', please let me know at en:User_talk:Dudemanfellabra, and I will try to resolve the problem. The script will now exit itself. Sorry!", // self-explanatory "CheckingMatches":"Checking for matches...", "EditSummary":"[[:en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Halbautomatisches]] hinzufügen von Bildern und/oder Commonskategorien zur Denkmalliste", "NoneFound":"No matches found or selected. Script exited.", "Found":"Matches found!", "FollowingImages":"NAME matches the following images:", // asking to select either a matched image or a category; shouldn't include the words for "image" or "category" "SelectOne":"Select one to add:", "DontAddImage":"Do not add any image", "OtherSuggested":"Other suggested images for NAME from matched or existing categories:", "Suggested":"Suggested images for NAME from matched or existing categories:", // included with each suggested image showing which category it is a member of "From":"from CATNAME", "FollowingCats":"NAME matches the following categories:", "DontAddCat":"Do not add any category", // shown on the button "SelectButton":"Select", "Done":"Done!<br>Editing page...", "SuccessfulEdit":"Done! Refresh the page to see the result!", "FailedEdit":"The edit query returned an error.", "LeavePage":"Are you sure you want to leave the page? All categories/files that you have added will not be saved!"
// The strings "ROWTEMPLATE", "NAME", "CATNAME", etc. should not be translated but can be moved around for better grammar. // These strings will be replaced by the relevant items during output. // text to be displayed in the button you click to start the script "ButtonText":"Commons nach Bildern und Kategorien durchsuchen", // Error at the beginning of the script to catch templates that don't include the correct CSS class "RowMismatch":"Zeilenfehler! Dies kommt möglicherweise von einer falsch formatierten Zeilenvorlage. Alle Zeilenvorlagen müssen class='vcard' enthalten, damit das Skript sie identifizieren kann. Sollte {{ROWTEMPLATE}} class='vcard' beinhalten, bitte ich um eine Nachricht auf :en:User_talk:Dudemanfellabra, und ich werde versuchen, das Problem zu beheben. Das Skript wird jetzt beendet.", // self-explanatory "CheckingMatches":"Nach Übereinstimmungen suchen ...", "EditSummary":"[[:en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Halbautomatisches]] Hinzufügen von Bildern und/oder Commons-Kategorien zur Denkmalliste", "NoneFound":"Keine Übereinstimmungen gefunden oder selektiert. Das Skript wird jetzt beendet.", "Found":"Übereinstimmungen gefunden!", "FollowingImages":"NAME stimmt mit folgenden Bildern überein:", // asking to select either a matched image or a category; shouldn't include the words for "image" or "category" "SelectOne":"Zum Hinzufügen auswählen:", "DontAddImage":"Kein Bild hinzufügen", "OtherSuggested":"Andere mögliche Bilder für NAME aus der gefundenen oder bereits existierenden Kategorie:", "Suggested":"Mögliche Bilder für NAME aus der gefundenen oder bereits existierenden Kategorie:", // included with each suggested image showing which category it is a member of "From":"aus CATNAME", "FollowingCats":"NAME passt auf folgende Kategorien:", "DontAddCat":"Keine Kategorie hinzufügen", // shown on the button "SelectButton":"Auswählen", "Done":"Fast fertig!<br>Artikel wird bearbeitet ...", "SuccessfulEdit":"Fertig! Seite neu laden, um das Ergebnis anzusehen!", "FailedEdit":"Die Bearbeitung ist fehlgeschlagen.", "LeavePage":"Bist du sicher, dass du die Seite verlassen möchtest? Die ausgewählten Kategorien und Bilder werden nicht gespeichert!"
Ususal disclaimer about Umlauts. I will ask for someone else to have a look over as well. Agathoclea ( talk) 11:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
I am stuck with de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Wien/Floridsdorf and others from de:Benutzer:ErfgoedBot/Denkmal Österreich missing commons category links despite this change. I have two scratchpads over there de:Benutzer:Agathoclea/scratchpad and de:Benutzer:Agathoclea/Vorlagentest the latter containing a copy of the template. Agathoclea ( talk) 07:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Bad Windsheim causes the script to freeze. Agathoclea ( talk) 11:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I found a couple more lists: de:Vorlage:Denkmalliste Slowakei Tabellenzeile / commons:Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Slovakia with known IDs and :de:Vorlage:Denkmalliste Südtirol Tabellenzeile]] / commons:Cultural heritage monuments in South Tyrol with known IDs
{{
Denkmalliste Malta Tabellenzeile}}
, {{
Denkmalliste Slowakei Tabellenzeile}}
, and {{
WLPA-AT-Zeile}}
. In order to add support for each template, I have to actually visit the template and sometimes the lists on which it is transcluded and figure out which parameters are used for the name, the image, the commonscat, the id, and if the ID used in the row template matches the format of the sortkey on Commons. It's a bit of work, especially when the language is something like Arabic or armenian that uses a different script. I can pretty much pick out the parameters in any language that uses Latin characters, and I'm decent at Cyrillic ones (e.g. Russian), but the point is, it's a bit of a slow process. Be patient with me :).--
Dudemanfellabra (
talk)
07:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)see this comment from @ Samar: which might explain the missing id's you have been asking about. Agathoclea ( talk) 10:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry: I completely forgot about the list! I know that I should do that (look at my edits to the list after rearranging the Cincinnati OH lists), so I should have remembered. Nyttend ( talk) 04:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
The NRHPstats script is reporting two untagged articles in Koochiching County, Minnesota, even though there's only one. I suspect this has something to do with the duplicate link in the list, as two entries link to the tagged Grand Mound (Minnesota). Could you look into what's going on here? TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 01:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to offer my compliments on your recent change in status from graduate student to ... graduate? Anyway, congratulations regardless of title. dm ( talk) 07:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
I am a member of the planning committee for Wiki Love Monuments-Ireland 2014. As part of the contest I am compiling a list of National Monuments in Ireland and I came across your page List of National Monuments of Ireland I was curious where you obtained this list and if you had to ask for permission to use it. Any help you can provide would be appreciated.
Sameichel ( talk) 08:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar | |
For writing the NRHP-list renumbering script, which has just
made
my life
so much easier._ |
I don't know if you've noticed this, but the stats script tries to run when you either create a "National Register of Historic Places listings" page, or when you look at a special page (such as the "Related changes" page) based on one. It's a minor thing (the error popup needs to be dismissed), dunno how much work it is to account for those sorts of cases.
I also added some rows to WP:NRHPPROGRESS that you might double-check that I didn't miss anything (I also added an entry to the switch on the duplicates page). Magic ♪piano 16:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
While I'm here :) I have another apparent buglet. National Register of Historic Places listings in Hillsborough County, New Hampshire is shown by the stats script to have 100 listings imaged. However, there are actually 101 images (only Hillsborough Mills and New England Glassworks lack images). I suspect the regexp is failing to match one the image filenames (maybe "---File---lyndeboroughtownhall.JPG"?). Magic ♪piano 17:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I just noticed your edit to Grade II* listed buildings in Sedgemoor and the edit summary "Semi-automated addition of image(s) and/or commonscat link(s) to monument list". I think this could be really useful (although I don't understand the code which makes it work). Is it possible for other people to use the script? If not could you run it on all of the sublists of Grade I listed buildings in Somerset and Grade II* listed buildings in Somerset as I'm sure there are others with categories on commons which are not linked - but I can't find them.— Rod talk 10:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
importScript('User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks.js')
Just for the sake of information, I have now completed the table at User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks#Supported registers to include the row templates, the commons templates, and the commons categories that are used to allow compatibility with this script. I think the examples there can explain the requirements more clearly. In order for Scheduled Monuments and these other registers to be supported, they need to have all of these templates/categories set up.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 06:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the marvy new tool! I've gone through all the Florida lists (I see you've done at least some). Now to add that NRHP template to all the categories on Commons that don't have them already. 'Cause not only was I a categorizing fool, others also did categorizing of my photos without me knowing. Oh joy. :) I think I'll add the proper code to the Florida NHL list, so that can have links added too. Cheers! --‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 14:28, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
importScript
, though, all updates should immediately go into effect for you. I do see on your
JavaScript file, though, that you have some other code that looks like
User:Dudemanfellabra/ReorderNRHPlist.js--in fact like an old version of it. Feel free to keep that there, but if you want to be able to use the newest version, you can replace all that other code withimportScript('User:Dudemanfellabra/ReorderNRHPlist.js')
Hi. I've been writing a template {{ Address restricted}}. I have it almost done, but I've run into a problem that has me stumped - probably because I'm being very clumsy with parameters. I wonder if you could take a few minutes to help me troubleshoot? Let me know if you're willing, and I'll explain the problem more fully at Template talk:Address restricted. Thanks. — Ipoellet ( talk) 03:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
Not just for technical skills that are in short supply around here and an even, friendly nature that is sometimes very much needed, both of which are worthy of multiple barnstars on their own: but also for being instantly willing to help out a floundering noob who needed it. You are an incredibly valuable Wikipedian. — Ipoellet ( talk) 03:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
When you get back from your exotic trip, would you be able to submit a request for the bot to do a new task? I've always been annoyed that "National Register of Historic Places in [placename]" isn't a valid link, especially since that's the format used by the categories. Could you request permission for the bot to mass-create redirects? I was thinking that "National Register of Historic Places in PLACE" should redirect to a county list if it exists as a separate page, or if it is itself a redirect, it should instead redirect to the correctly-named page's target. For example, the bot would create National Register of Historic Places in Lauderdale County, Alabama as a redirect to National Register of Historic Places listings in Lauderdale County, Alabama, while it would create National Register of Historic Places in Wabash County, Illinois as a redirect to the current target of National Register of Historic Places listings in Wabash County, Illinois. Nyttend ( talk) 02:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/NationalRegisterBot 2 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.
Hi. An image is being repeatedly added in error to Grade I listed buildings in Exeter - you are one of the users concerned. Please see Talk:Grade I listed buildings in Exeter#Wrong pic for Presentation of St Mary Convent School, and could one of you stop this semi-automated process from doing it again? Thanks very much - Aegoceras ( talk) 10:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Your recent bot request at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/NationalRegisterBot 2 has been approved, please see the page. The BAGBot may come and let you know as well. — xaosflux Talk 01:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
I've been going through the Ohio table in the sandbox, and have noticed a few properties that have one number from NRHP, and a newer number when it became an NHL. Since these are NHL tables, should the refnum in the table be the NHL number? Currently, your script has plucked the older NRHP numbers to populate the table. I can make the corrections, just wanted to make sure it was the right thing to do that would not cause problems down the road. I temporarily stuck the nhl number in the description field, I'll clean that up before I move the sandbox table to live. Generic1139 ( talk) 20:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, great work. Thanks a lot. I ran across because of the change in Vorlage:Denkmalliste Österreich Tabellenzeile. I feel this script will help a lot to accelerate work. I added your script to act as some kind of beta tester. My first try looks good.
2 questions (at the moment):
The script is not so useful, when lists are already completed. You have to find the right lists with missing images and run your script. It is more useful, when lists are at the beginning and mostly empty. As far as I understand, new types of lists (e.g. for WLE) have to match some preconditions (a template for the row, an ID, a template for the image/category on commons taking the ID) and have to be configured in your configuration data. Right?
BTW: What is the intent and the schedule? Is this an offer for experienced users, will it be activated for all users or will it operate automatically during competition times (with all the pros & cons).
The process during competitions at least for the Austrian cultural heritage monuments (WLM) is that new and inexperienced users upload their contributions through the campaign-configured Upload-Wizard. They expect their images to show up in the lists, which only happens after manual back-office work at the moment. Could your script be used to automatically add an image to the list? If a user uploads more than one image in a single upload, she has to chose of course. There is a tradeoff, if she uploads images for more than one object in the same list, which will then cause an edit for each row an images is added.
kind regards -- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 08:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
|commonscat=
" is not present at all, so doing a kind of "replace" call would fail, and the new argument would almost have to be tacked onto the end of the template, unless I wanted to hard-code in the "preferred" order of arguments for each template. Some templates may want the image parameter at the top, some at the bottom, some somewhere in the middle but only if this parameter is there and if this other parameter is there, it needs to go directly below that one and on and on and on... That's not something I really want to dedicate a massive amount of time to doing, especially given the extremely marginal benefit of doing it.some minor remarks on the L10N stuff for German:
-- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 09:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, I understand your issue on the order of template arguments. It is tedious to implement. It just makes it harder to find the argument when editing the stuff manually (which I do a lot at the moment). You will never get all that you want. :-) Thanks for asking for help with translation, but I'm afraid, I'm not good enough in other languages other than German and partly English. But what still needs to be done is the
translation of the description. If this is getting stable, you can contact me. And finally the script needs a place in some more common namespace and maybe WP. --
Herzi Pinki (
talk)
09:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Another two issues:
I realize that some registers have multiple parameters for IDs (e.g. {{
Table row Wallonia}} has IDs in the form |niscode=
+"-"+|objcode=
), and the script already supports many that do, but if it's possible, I like to keep it down to one parameter. When you question whether the keys will be "persistent", what do you mean? My question is if they are unique, i.e. is there some site that has the "nd599" in e.g. AT-1 instead of AT-4? If not, including the region code is pointless. If they are repeated trans-region, then it is required. Basically I'm trying to include as little information as possible and still keep everything uniquely identified. If I don't have to use two parameters, I don't want to. There is no need to change ID parameters on enwiki.. this is only Commons-related.--
Dudemanfellabra (
talk)
02:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, so Multichill did not respond and I was on vacation and then I forgot, sorry. Using your script and it failed, brought this discussion to my mind again. I think we could decide to change all the templates if it will help to solve the problem and you will be still willing to change your algorithm. Would be wise to contact all the creators of the templates first.
I came back here because the script fails at de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Bichlbach (while it works on other lists). I suppose the reason is the redirection of template {{Denkmalliste Österreich Tabellenzeile (ehemaliges Denkmal)}} to {{Denkmalliste Österreich Tabellenzeile}}. We use this indirection to allow bots to differ between current monuments and former monuments, while avoiding to have a redundant c/p implementation. regards -- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 16:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm trying to use the AddCommonsCatLinks tools in the page National Register of Historic Places listings in Miami-Dade County, Florida. There are links (like Cape Florida Light) with a Commons category linked in the page using the commons template and also in Wikidata, that are not detected: any hints? Thanks, Pietro ( talk) 17:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, hi @ Krd:, I found a race condition between scripts that you both do provide. May I ask you to think whether there is a simple solution. The situation is:
There is not a real problem with that, but it could turn out to become one.
Nevertheless, if there is a simple solution, a fix would be highly appreciated. Your tools are both widely used. My preferred solution was to respect the structure of template arguments and change the User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks script to not insert the new argument at the bottom of all the template arguments. But this seems to be difficult. Krd, maybe you have an idea how this can be achieved easily. The other solution would be that you Krd relieve the restrictions in order of template arguments. It's up to you folks to find the best solution. thanks -- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 10:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that someone else had split the Rock Hill listings out of York County, South Carolina, so I added a few rows to WP:NRHPPROGRESS and added the county WP:NRHPPROGRESS/Duplicates. I have the script running right now to adjust the counts for South Carolina. Is there anything else that needs to be updated when a sublist is split from a county, or did I get everything? TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 04:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
The Savanna-Sabula Bridge spans the Mississippi River between Carroll County IL and Jackson County IA, but until a few minutes ago, it only appeared on the IA list and thus wasn't in any of the multi-state duplication sections of WP:NRHPPROGRESS. Could you please fix this situation and show me what I should have changed? I've added it to National Register of Historic Places listings in Carroll County, Illinois; I just need help with the progress page. Nyttend ( talk) 04:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra! I tried to use your tool at the Czech Wikipedia for monument lists. However, the tool required class='vcard' in the template cs:Šablona:Památky v Česku. Should be something added to the template? -- ŠJů ( talk) 21:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
I added the Czech translation to the discussion page of the tool now.
Btw., when the script fails, the message ("Preferred language unavailable... Checking for matches...) stays hanging on the page and contains no "×" symbol to be closed. Some links from the background page penetrate into the message window. -- ŠJů ( talk) 15:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I tested the tool on the list cs:Seznam kulturních památek v Chomutově. cs:Wikipedie:WikiProjekt Wiki Loves Monuments/Missing commons category links contains 3 commonscat links which should be added to the list. However, your script found no matches. -- ŠJů ( talk) 07:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Great work! The function of adding commonscat links works perfectly! I believe, adding of images will work as well. It there will appear some complication, a will contact you again, but I hope, the script is adapted for the Czech wikipedia already. -- ŠJů ( talk) 22:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I was using your Commons script to add a new category to National Register of Historic Places listings in Charleston County, South Carolina, and the script is claiming there's a match for Bleak Hall Plantation Outbuildings but isn't displaying any images or a category. The history of Botany Bay Plantation Wildlife Management Area shows that there was a photo of the site that was deleted in January; I'm not sure if that has anything to do with the problem, but it might be relevant. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 09:32, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey Dudeman, I've finished processing the NHL lists you converted by script to templates. I did notice that you did not convert List of NHLs in Other, which looks the only NHL list that hasn't been converted to templates yet. Magic ♪piano 15:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Just so you know, I changed the UpdateNRHPProgress script to remove Zavala County, Texas from the list of empty counties, since it now has a listing. Normally I would've asked you first, but since you haven't been active in a few weeks I wanted to make sure the script worked properly in the meantime. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 22:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Just a note to everyone else who's been coming here — I contacted him offline, and he said that he's crazily busy in real life. He's definitely planning to come back when things calm down, when he doesn't need about 48 hours in a day anymore. Nyttend ( talk) 03:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Analyzing both the statistics in the NRHP project progress and the result of vector.js script, you can find county lists (like Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, Escambia, Pasco, Union) apparently fully populated, but declared as incomplete: how to identify the missing articles? Thanks, Pietro ( talk) 14:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the long absence, guys; I've been really busy in real life. The way the script handles these links is by checking if an article is assessed list-class. If it is list-class, there are two outcomes: 1) If "National Register of Historic Places" is in the title, the script counts it as unarticled; 2) otherwise, the script counts it as stub-class. If the article is not list-class, the script just goes with stub or start+ regardless of the title. While yes, this case would be "fixed" by just making the script check for "National Register of Historic Places listings" (note the extra word), I think the better solution for MPS articles would be just to change the assessment of the article to something other than list-class if there is enough information about each site to warrant doing so. That said, though, in this case, the article is a list and thus the assessment should not be changed. There is little to no more information about each individual building on the MPS page than there is in the county list, so I think the listing should be counted as unarticled. Thankfully, TheCatalyst31 has started articles on the sites in question, so this point is irrelevant now, but I agree with the output of the script saying the sites were unarticled until these new articles were created. If anything, I think the script should be modified to check for the words "Thematic Resource/TR" and "Multiple Property Submission/MPS" to count those as unarticled as well.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 01:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I split Madison from the Dane County, Wisconsin list, so you should update your bot script to reflect that before the next time you run it. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 04:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
I just ran the script on National Register of Historic Places listings in Middlesex County, New Jersey, and when it reaches the Goldman House, it suggests an image to add even though that row already has an image. Looking at your code, I'm pretty sure that the bug has something to do with the existing image not being on Commons, since your code seems to only validate existing images by checking if they're on Commons. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 06:06, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
See National Register of Historic Places listings in western Puerto Rico, the script didn't work well on that page, for example on the first row 5, it didn't remove the old coord template. Maybe due to the small that was missing a /small? I reverted the changes the script made to that page. Generic1139 ( talk) 21:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Or maybe not, National Register of Historic Places listings in the Northern Mariana Islands is also wrong, and it had the closing tag. I reverted it as well. Generic1139 ( talk) 21:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry for causing the confusion. I remember this coming up once before, but that was a situation in which I either split a list into two or merged two lists into one. Here, I figured that someone had simply messed up the list, rearranging it in an unhelpful way; I was completely unaware that they were separate entries on NRHPPROGRESS, so if I'd thought about it, I would have assumed that the bot was counting them all together, or that I was undoing a messup that would confuse the bot and thus unconfusing it. Curious, do you have any idea why this list ended up this way? Finally, sorry for the late reply; I've been in Philadelphia for the last couple of days (tons of photos, although almost everything was already illustrated), and I'm at a restaurant 1½ hours from home. If you respond tonight, please be aware that I might not. Nyttend ( talk) 00:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I was planning on trying to find the untagged articles through AWB so they could be tagged; having the extra redirects ends up making that more difficult, so I changed the couple that only had a handful. Found one untagged so far so hasn't been in vain at least. On a side note, by doing this I found that USS Hornet Museum wasn't tagged, but USS Hornet (CV-12) is; I'm not positive which would be the main article for the project and which one should merely be related-importance, if tagged at all. Wizardman 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
You might look at the footnotes of Arkansas at WP:NRHPPROGRESS (it seems to be the only one that's weird). Magic ♪piano 02:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
If you go to a nonexistent article's article page (as opposed to the edit tab that automatically loads when you click a redlink), a message pops up saying that NRHPstats could not load the wikitext and has been aborted, which seems unnecessary for a nonexistent page that has no wikitext. It's a pretty low-priority error since most editors with the script won't see it (I only found it thanks to a bad offsite link), but you might want to look into it if it's an easy fix. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 02:49, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
If you think it's a good idea, would you be willing to implement a suggestion I've made? WT:NRHP#Back to NRHP list missing coords is a proposal that Category:NRHP list missing coordinates be applied only when the coords are missing from a current listing; many of the lists in this category are present only because of one of more former listings without coords. Nyttend ( talk) 01:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Really enjoyed the new set of graphs at Talk:WikiProject NRHP, though I share your regret that we didn't have more data points during the 2013 photo contest. Just so you know, your maps and graphs are definitely helping to spur at least one photographer: when I recently passed through North Carolina, I put in a bit of extra effort when I saw that I could shift the state to a paler shade of blue, and then hit a few extra sites in order to turn one county from deep blue to very light orange. Even if you're not taking photos yourself, you're giving other some great incentive to do so. Thanks! — Ammodramus ( talk) 21:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra. The template {{ Infobox nhsc}} is being proposed for merger into the template {{ Infobox historic site}} that you created in 2009. Unfortunately the instructions at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion fail to mention notifying the creator of the template that is the suggested target of the merge, so discussion has already begun at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 2 #Template:Infobox nhsc. Nevertheless, any input you may make there would be valued. Cheers -- RexxS ( talk) 23:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, how are you doing? I removed the re-addition of the so-called Image of the Concrete Block House (#45) in the National Register of Historic Places listings in Phoenix, Arizona. I have been taking pictures and documenting historical structures of Phoenix for some years now, which I share with Wikipedia and the Arizona Republic. The Concrete Block House which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places was built in 1916 was located in 618-620 N. 4th Ave. The house was demolished and a modern condo was built in 2008 where the historic house once stood. This condo is not listed in the National Register of Historic Places and therefore it would be wrong to have the wrong image placed in the list. Thank you, Tony the Marine ( talk) 03:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an
archive of past discussions for the period March 2014 through February 2015. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Please don't take this as a complaint, either "you're slow" or "you're making a mess" or anything else — I'm just bringing this up in case you have the chance to work on it at some point. Nyttend ( talk) 21:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Another Virginia anomaly for you. The (two) listings for the independent city of Norton, Virginia were combined with those of surrounding Wise County, Virginia. I have separated the two in National Register of Historic Places listings in Wise County, Virginia (and redirected National Register of Historic Places listings in Norton, Virginia there, away from National Register of Historic Places listings in Virginia), but your files or the script may need updating. (N.B. the other zero listing in Virginia, Poquoson, Virginia, is surrounded by York County, but seems to actually not have any listings at this time.) Magic ♪piano 17:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
It's simply that these images skew the statistics, making it seem as if we've gotten photos at sites for which we have nothing. Vaguely comparable to putting together a stub on an MPS and then using it in place of links to nonexistent articles, e.g. how List of the 1733 Spanish Plate Fleet Shipwrecks is linked at National Register of Historic Places listings in Monroe County, Florida. Someone could even pad the stats by writing a slightly nonstub MPS article just to save effort on sites with documentation and link it, e.g. hitting "undo" on this edit; for practical purposes, it's no different from adding these image links. Nyttend ( talk) 03:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
I just saw your WT:NRHP discussion with Orlady regarding the Jesse Whitesell House and Farm. As the photographer for the images currently in the article, I can tell you that it's rather confusing on the ground, too; I wasn't quite clear what I should photograph in order to get elements of both the original and the increase. If I correctly understand your words, I agree with what you've said: although it was originally located just in Kentucky, it needs to be listed as a duplicate because the increase causes the listing to include resources on both sides of the border. Nyttend ( talk) 04:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
I'm posting this here because I didn't want to write it twice on each of your talk pages haha, and I didn't want to bother the entire project just to talk to you two, User:Nyttend and User:TheCatalyst31 (I'm hoping that ping will alert you to this?). The reason I only want to talk to you two is because you're the only other people I've seen occasionally use the progress script to update the Progress page. I've been working for the past day or two on an update to the script which uses a different method to scrape the data from the county lists than before and in turn dramatically speeds up the process. Instead of taking (on my slow connection) roughly 2-2.5 hours, I now consistently get runs of about 45-50 minutes, and I expect them to be even faster when I go back next week to my faster connection.
I'm still not convinced that I have worked all the bugs out, though, so I haven't actually edited the progress script with these changes. The current test code is at User:Dudemanfellabra/Sandbox.js and the output is at User:Dudemanfellabra/Sandbox. Comparing that output to what's currently on the Progress page (made convenient by this dif), they roughly match, although there are some small differences. Some of those differences are due to the fact that the updates are 3 days apart, and one would expect there to be differences due to new article creation, etc., but some I believe due to the magnitude of them (i.e. the total number of listed sites in the entire country dropped by ~100) are due to the different approaches to the code. I am beginning to look through to compare the data to what the NRHPstats script outputs on the individual county lists as well as what I can manually tabulate, but I figured three sets of eyes is better than one. Would either/both of you care to help me look over this?
To be honest, I'm actually more inclined to trust this newer data because of the new way I handle in-county duplications, but the new code uses some complicated regular expressions to extract the data from the wikitext whereas before I was just using the processed HTML (the processing of which was what led to the long wait time), so maybe those regex's miss some listings that the old code doesn't? One possible reason would be hard-coded table rows, which my new code wouldn't catch (it only looks for transclusions of {{ NRHP row}}). Those shouldn't exist, though, because if they did, my bot would (in theory) catch them and report them as having no refnum on the county list since that was only introduced recently via the row template. The thing I don't like is that the number of total sites reported by the new code is lower than what's given on United States National Register of Historic Places listings, which I trust to be the most accurate of the three numbers. Then again, this may be due to the newly generated duplicates differing in many states to what was on the Progress page before automation, which was usually just a copy and paste extension of what was on the relevant state list.
If I can get this working in an acceptable manner, I'll hopefully apply the same technique to the bot code itself. Currently that code takes anywhere from 5-7 hours depending on my connection to run, so I would expect to at least shave an hour or so off of that. Most of that time, though, is spent querying individual pages to see if they need to be tagged with NRIS-only, so that won't be sped up at all. Either way, some improvement is better than none, so I'll take it! Thanks for you guys' continuous help!-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 21:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
@ TheCatalyst31: Sorry for the long silence, but last week at school was pretty gruelling (getting down to the end of the semester now), and I haven't had time to do anything until now. I'm still trying to figure out any differences between my new code and the old code, and the next major difference I find is Coconino County, Arizona, which shows on the Progress page as 25 stubs, 39 Start+ (which matches the NRHPstats script for me) and in my sandbox as 35 stubs, 29 Start+. I made a manual table like the one above for this county below:
As you can see, this matches the new code instead of the old one, leading me to believe the new code is better. I think what happened is the old code took the 11-time duplicated Lookout trees article and mistakenly counted it as Start+. The new code does a better job at the article titles attached to their ratings by looping through an array each time a rating is queried instead of assuming elements are going to line up. With this bit of evidence, I'm now willing to say the new code is superior to the old code, both in speed and in accuracy. I'm going to copy it in and run it now.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 15:19, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm not absolutely sure that your edit is responsible, but either this edit or something else is causing embedded NRHP infoboxes to be misaligned—they're being treated as entries in the wrapping infoboxes, left-aligning with the text of the other entries rather than with the labels (or headings, if you will) of the entries. See, for instance, the example under " Embedding" at the template page. Could you look into this? Deor ( talk) 11:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Is it really a good thing that we're going to get Tripling Elephants on the Late Show? Be ready for a repeat of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elephant (wikipedia article) and related Colberrorism :-) Nyttend backup ( talk) 21:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
While tagging some untagged articles, I came across this article, which should have been tagged as NRIS-only but wasn't. Do you have any idea how the bot skipped that one? TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 09:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. For a number of reasons, most recently my recent trip to China, I haven't been able to work on NRHP articles in a few weeks, but I eventually do plan to get back to them. Daniel Case ( talk) 16:59, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Before I noticed your last message I tried it in Firefox: File:NRHP_Firefox_scriptoutput.jpg Agathoclea ( talk) 19:10, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Uncaught ReferenceError: jsonObject is not defined
I found the culprit script User:AzaToth/morebits.js resulting in an error on line 93
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'replace' of undefined
Just wondering what I was using it for. Agathoclea ( talk) 20:29, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'scrollIntoView' of undefined
line 152 when running on National Register of Historic Places listings in Carbon County, Pennsylvania Agathoclea ( talk) 20:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
commons:Category:Longmire Buildings only showed for its second id not for the first one. (To test you will need to revert two edits of mine) Agathoclea ( talk) 22:57, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'scrollIntoView' of undefined
|uid=#######
instead of |refnum=########
. I'll make it recognize which one we're looking at based on the title of the page and adjust itself accordingly. That might take some time, though, as during the week I have class and have to focus on it, especially since it's now the end of the semester, and my professors have piled the work on top of me. I'm a few weeks away from getting my Master's, so after May 2, I should have tons more time to devote to this. Thanks for the suggestion! I didn't realize there were other setups like this. If there are any more like these two, I can probably incorporate them as well, making this a universal script. Thanks again!--
Dudemanfellabra (
talk)
13:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Another oddity: National Register of Historic Places listings in Middlesex County, Connecticut has a former listing that shows a category to be added. But it does not get saved neither can I see an error in the console. As for my ideas: I think I will put them on the talkpage of the script to kepp this page uncluttered. It might take me just as long as I have some leave next week which I plan to spend away from the keyboard. Agathoclea ( talk) 22:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Agathoclea: I've just updated the script to be able to handle listed buildings in England and ran it on all of the pages listed here. In the process I also made it compatible with listed buildings in Wales, although I don't believe the bot has output any lists of missing links for Wales (correct me if I'm wrong). I ran it on Grade I listed buildings in Conwy County Borough and found a few missing links, which I let the script add. Could you perhaps try to find more missing in Wales somewhere? If it doesn't work, let me know. Now that I have the extension ready, it is relatively straightforward to extend it to most if not all of these categories. The first on the list would be the rest of the listed buildings in the UK. If that is desired, I can probably do it. Just let me know!-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 00:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
I have now added the functionality to find and add matching images to lists. I tested it with an NRHP page and a Nepali page and got satisfactory results. I can't at present think of a way around the major time increase, but if I do, I'll try to shrink it as much as possible. As always, let me know if you find anything that doesn't work.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 03:09, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
@ Agathoclea: I just modified the script again to get around the long download time at the beginning. Instead of downloading the entirety of Commons data, I now construct a category/file sortkey (the thing {{ DEFAULTSORT}} speficies) from the ID in the table row and only query to see if there are matches with that. Now each row takes a second or so to query before moving on to the next instead of the instantaneous jump as before. Now, though, there is no wait at the beginning to get started, so it's a trade-off kind of thing. For places like Nepal with very few categories on Commons this might actually increase the time it takes to run the script, but for registers like the NRHP with many thousands of files, it speeds up the process tremendously. This will make things better in the long run, too, when more and more files/categories are ID'd on Commons. Let me know how you like the change and also as usual if you find any errors.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 08:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
"nice script" Agathoclea ( talk) 18:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, that will be interesting. I will try and look a litte bit closer tonicht, but so far I noticed two things. The editsummary is not crosswiki-safe and I have run into a possible script conflict again like at the beginnng. It gets stuck at "Checking for matches...". I will try and identify the culprit tonight. Agathoclea ( talk) 08:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
"EditSummary":"[[en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Semi-automated]] addition of image(s) and/or commonscat link(s) to monument list",
"EditSummary":"[[:en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Semi-automated]] addition of image(s) and/or commonscat link(s) to monument list",
"EditSummary":"[[:en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Halbautomatisches]] hinzufügen von Bildern und/oder Commonskategorien zur Denkmalliste",
// The strings "ROWTEMPLATE", "NAME", "CATNAME", etc. should not be translated but can be moved around for better grammar. // These strings will be replaced by the relevant items during output. // text to be displayed in the button you click to start the script "ButtonText":"Check Commons for images and categories", // Error at the beginning of the script to catch templates that don't include the correct CSS class "RowMismatch":"Row mismatch! This is probably due to an incorrectly formatted row template. All row templates must include class='vcard' in order for this script to identify them. If {{ROWTEMPLATE}} does include class='vcard', please let me know at en:User_talk:Dudemanfellabra, and I will try to resolve the problem. The script will now exit itself. Sorry!", // self-explanatory "CheckingMatches":"Checking for matches...", "EditSummary":"[[:en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Halbautomatisches]] hinzufügen von Bildern und/oder Commonskategorien zur Denkmalliste", "NoneFound":"No matches found or selected. Script exited.", "Found":"Matches found!", "FollowingImages":"NAME matches the following images:", // asking to select either a matched image or a category; shouldn't include the words for "image" or "category" "SelectOne":"Select one to add:", "DontAddImage":"Do not add any image", "OtherSuggested":"Other suggested images for NAME from matched or existing categories:", "Suggested":"Suggested images for NAME from matched or existing categories:", // included with each suggested image showing which category it is a member of "From":"from CATNAME", "FollowingCats":"NAME matches the following categories:", "DontAddCat":"Do not add any category", // shown on the button "SelectButton":"Select", "Done":"Done!<br>Editing page...", "SuccessfulEdit":"Done! Refresh the page to see the result!", "FailedEdit":"The edit query returned an error.", "LeavePage":"Are you sure you want to leave the page? All categories/files that you have added will not be saved!"
// The strings "ROWTEMPLATE", "NAME", "CATNAME", etc. should not be translated but can be moved around for better grammar. // These strings will be replaced by the relevant items during output. // text to be displayed in the button you click to start the script "ButtonText":"Commons nach Bildern und Kategorien durchsuchen", // Error at the beginning of the script to catch templates that don't include the correct CSS class "RowMismatch":"Zeilenfehler! Dies kommt möglicherweise von einer falsch formatierten Zeilenvorlage. Alle Zeilenvorlagen müssen class='vcard' enthalten, damit das Skript sie identifizieren kann. Sollte {{ROWTEMPLATE}} class='vcard' beinhalten, bitte ich um eine Nachricht auf :en:User_talk:Dudemanfellabra, und ich werde versuchen, das Problem zu beheben. Das Skript wird jetzt beendet.", // self-explanatory "CheckingMatches":"Nach Übereinstimmungen suchen ...", "EditSummary":"[[:en:User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks|Halbautomatisches]] Hinzufügen von Bildern und/oder Commons-Kategorien zur Denkmalliste", "NoneFound":"Keine Übereinstimmungen gefunden oder selektiert. Das Skript wird jetzt beendet.", "Found":"Übereinstimmungen gefunden!", "FollowingImages":"NAME stimmt mit folgenden Bildern überein:", // asking to select either a matched image or a category; shouldn't include the words for "image" or "category" "SelectOne":"Zum Hinzufügen auswählen:", "DontAddImage":"Kein Bild hinzufügen", "OtherSuggested":"Andere mögliche Bilder für NAME aus der gefundenen oder bereits existierenden Kategorie:", "Suggested":"Mögliche Bilder für NAME aus der gefundenen oder bereits existierenden Kategorie:", // included with each suggested image showing which category it is a member of "From":"aus CATNAME", "FollowingCats":"NAME passt auf folgende Kategorien:", "DontAddCat":"Keine Kategorie hinzufügen", // shown on the button "SelectButton":"Auswählen", "Done":"Fast fertig!<br>Artikel wird bearbeitet ...", "SuccessfulEdit":"Fertig! Seite neu laden, um das Ergebnis anzusehen!", "FailedEdit":"Die Bearbeitung ist fehlgeschlagen.", "LeavePage":"Bist du sicher, dass du die Seite verlassen möchtest? Die ausgewählten Kategorien und Bilder werden nicht gespeichert!"
Ususal disclaimer about Umlauts. I will ask for someone else to have a look over as well. Agathoclea ( talk) 11:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
I am stuck with de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Wien/Floridsdorf and others from de:Benutzer:ErfgoedBot/Denkmal Österreich missing commons category links despite this change. I have two scratchpads over there de:Benutzer:Agathoclea/scratchpad and de:Benutzer:Agathoclea/Vorlagentest the latter containing a copy of the template. Agathoclea ( talk) 07:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
de:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Bad Windsheim causes the script to freeze. Agathoclea ( talk) 11:58, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I found a couple more lists: de:Vorlage:Denkmalliste Slowakei Tabellenzeile / commons:Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Slovakia with known IDs and :de:Vorlage:Denkmalliste Südtirol Tabellenzeile]] / commons:Cultural heritage monuments in South Tyrol with known IDs
{{
Denkmalliste Malta Tabellenzeile}}
, {{
Denkmalliste Slowakei Tabellenzeile}}
, and {{
WLPA-AT-Zeile}}
. In order to add support for each template, I have to actually visit the template and sometimes the lists on which it is transcluded and figure out which parameters are used for the name, the image, the commonscat, the id, and if the ID used in the row template matches the format of the sortkey on Commons. It's a bit of work, especially when the language is something like Arabic or armenian that uses a different script. I can pretty much pick out the parameters in any language that uses Latin characters, and I'm decent at Cyrillic ones (e.g. Russian), but the point is, it's a bit of a slow process. Be patient with me :).--
Dudemanfellabra (
talk)
07:17, 23 July 2014 (UTC)see this comment from @ Samar: which might explain the missing id's you have been asking about. Agathoclea ( talk) 10:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry: I completely forgot about the list! I know that I should do that (look at my edits to the list after rearranging the Cincinnati OH lists), so I should have remembered. Nyttend ( talk) 04:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
The NRHPstats script is reporting two untagged articles in Koochiching County, Minnesota, even though there's only one. I suspect this has something to do with the duplicate link in the list, as two entries link to the tagged Grand Mound (Minnesota). Could you look into what's going on here? TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 01:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Just wanted to offer my compliments on your recent change in status from graduate student to ... graduate? Anyway, congratulations regardless of title. dm ( talk) 07:04, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
I am a member of the planning committee for Wiki Love Monuments-Ireland 2014. As part of the contest I am compiling a list of National Monuments in Ireland and I came across your page List of National Monuments of Ireland I was curious where you obtained this list and if you had to ask for permission to use it. Any help you can provide would be appreciated.
Sameichel ( talk) 08:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Technical Barnstar | |
For writing the NRHP-list renumbering script, which has just
made
my life
so much easier._ |
I don't know if you've noticed this, but the stats script tries to run when you either create a "National Register of Historic Places listings" page, or when you look at a special page (such as the "Related changes" page) based on one. It's a minor thing (the error popup needs to be dismissed), dunno how much work it is to account for those sorts of cases.
I also added some rows to WP:NRHPPROGRESS that you might double-check that I didn't miss anything (I also added an entry to the switch on the duplicates page). Magic ♪piano 16:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
While I'm here :) I have another apparent buglet. National Register of Historic Places listings in Hillsborough County, New Hampshire is shown by the stats script to have 100 listings imaged. However, there are actually 101 images (only Hillsborough Mills and New England Glassworks lack images). I suspect the regexp is failing to match one the image filenames (maybe "---File---lyndeboroughtownhall.JPG"?). Magic ♪piano 17:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I just noticed your edit to Grade II* listed buildings in Sedgemoor and the edit summary "Semi-automated addition of image(s) and/or commonscat link(s) to monument list". I think this could be really useful (although I don't understand the code which makes it work). Is it possible for other people to use the script? If not could you run it on all of the sublists of Grade I listed buildings in Somerset and Grade II* listed buildings in Somerset as I'm sure there are others with categories on commons which are not linked - but I can't find them.— Rod talk 10:00, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
importScript('User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks.js')
Just for the sake of information, I have now completed the table at User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks#Supported registers to include the row templates, the commons templates, and the commons categories that are used to allow compatibility with this script. I think the examples there can explain the requirements more clearly. In order for Scheduled Monuments and these other registers to be supported, they need to have all of these templates/categories set up.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 06:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the marvy new tool! I've gone through all the Florida lists (I see you've done at least some). Now to add that NRHP template to all the categories on Commons that don't have them already. 'Cause not only was I a categorizing fool, others also did categorizing of my photos without me knowing. Oh joy. :) I think I'll add the proper code to the Florida NHL list, so that can have links added too. Cheers! --‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 14:28, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
importScript
, though, all updates should immediately go into effect for you. I do see on your
JavaScript file, though, that you have some other code that looks like
User:Dudemanfellabra/ReorderNRHPlist.js--in fact like an old version of it. Feel free to keep that there, but if you want to be able to use the newest version, you can replace all that other code withimportScript('User:Dudemanfellabra/ReorderNRHPlist.js')
Hi. I've been writing a template {{ Address restricted}}. I have it almost done, but I've run into a problem that has me stumped - probably because I'm being very clumsy with parameters. I wonder if you could take a few minutes to help me troubleshoot? Let me know if you're willing, and I'll explain the problem more fully at Template talk:Address restricted. Thanks. — Ipoellet ( talk) 03:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The da Vinci Barnstar | |
Not just for technical skills that are in short supply around here and an even, friendly nature that is sometimes very much needed, both of which are worthy of multiple barnstars on their own: but also for being instantly willing to help out a floundering noob who needed it. You are an incredibly valuable Wikipedian. — Ipoellet ( talk) 03:21, 27 June 2014 (UTC) |
When you get back from your exotic trip, would you be able to submit a request for the bot to do a new task? I've always been annoyed that "National Register of Historic Places in [placename]" isn't a valid link, especially since that's the format used by the categories. Could you request permission for the bot to mass-create redirects? I was thinking that "National Register of Historic Places in PLACE" should redirect to a county list if it exists as a separate page, or if it is itself a redirect, it should instead redirect to the correctly-named page's target. For example, the bot would create National Register of Historic Places in Lauderdale County, Alabama as a redirect to National Register of Historic Places listings in Lauderdale County, Alabama, while it would create National Register of Historic Places in Wabash County, Illinois as a redirect to the current target of National Register of Historic Places listings in Wabash County, Illinois. Nyttend ( talk) 02:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/NationalRegisterBot 2 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.
Hi. An image is being repeatedly added in error to Grade I listed buildings in Exeter - you are one of the users concerned. Please see Talk:Grade I listed buildings in Exeter#Wrong pic for Presentation of St Mary Convent School, and could one of you stop this semi-automated process from doing it again? Thanks very much - Aegoceras ( talk) 10:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Your recent bot request at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/NationalRegisterBot 2 has been approved, please see the page. The BAGBot may come and let you know as well. — xaosflux Talk 01:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
I've been going through the Ohio table in the sandbox, and have noticed a few properties that have one number from NRHP, and a newer number when it became an NHL. Since these are NHL tables, should the refnum in the table be the NHL number? Currently, your script has plucked the older NRHP numbers to populate the table. I can make the corrections, just wanted to make sure it was the right thing to do that would not cause problems down the road. I temporarily stuck the nhl number in the description field, I'll clean that up before I move the sandbox table to live. Generic1139 ( talk) 20:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, great work. Thanks a lot. I ran across because of the change in Vorlage:Denkmalliste Österreich Tabellenzeile. I feel this script will help a lot to accelerate work. I added your script to act as some kind of beta tester. My first try looks good.
2 questions (at the moment):
The script is not so useful, when lists are already completed. You have to find the right lists with missing images and run your script. It is more useful, when lists are at the beginning and mostly empty. As far as I understand, new types of lists (e.g. for WLE) have to match some preconditions (a template for the row, an ID, a template for the image/category on commons taking the ID) and have to be configured in your configuration data. Right?
BTW: What is the intent and the schedule? Is this an offer for experienced users, will it be activated for all users or will it operate automatically during competition times (with all the pros & cons).
The process during competitions at least for the Austrian cultural heritage monuments (WLM) is that new and inexperienced users upload their contributions through the campaign-configured Upload-Wizard. They expect their images to show up in the lists, which only happens after manual back-office work at the moment. Could your script be used to automatically add an image to the list? If a user uploads more than one image in a single upload, she has to chose of course. There is a tradeoff, if she uploads images for more than one object in the same list, which will then cause an edit for each row an images is added.
kind regards -- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 08:23, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
|commonscat=
" is not present at all, so doing a kind of "replace" call would fail, and the new argument would almost have to be tacked onto the end of the template, unless I wanted to hard-code in the "preferred" order of arguments for each template. Some templates may want the image parameter at the top, some at the bottom, some somewhere in the middle but only if this parameter is there and if this other parameter is there, it needs to go directly below that one and on and on and on... That's not something I really want to dedicate a massive amount of time to doing, especially given the extremely marginal benefit of doing it.some minor remarks on the L10N stuff for German:
-- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 09:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, I understand your issue on the order of template arguments. It is tedious to implement. It just makes it harder to find the argument when editing the stuff manually (which I do a lot at the moment). You will never get all that you want. :-) Thanks for asking for help with translation, but I'm afraid, I'm not good enough in other languages other than German and partly English. But what still needs to be done is the
translation of the description. If this is getting stable, you can contact me. And finally the script needs a place in some more common namespace and maybe WP. --
Herzi Pinki (
talk)
09:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Another two issues:
I realize that some registers have multiple parameters for IDs (e.g. {{
Table row Wallonia}} has IDs in the form |niscode=
+"-"+|objcode=
), and the script already supports many that do, but if it's possible, I like to keep it down to one parameter. When you question whether the keys will be "persistent", what do you mean? My question is if they are unique, i.e. is there some site that has the "nd599" in e.g. AT-1 instead of AT-4? If not, including the region code is pointless. If they are repeated trans-region, then it is required. Basically I'm trying to include as little information as possible and still keep everything uniquely identified. If I don't have to use two parameters, I don't want to. There is no need to change ID parameters on enwiki.. this is only Commons-related.--
Dudemanfellabra (
talk)
02:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, so Multichill did not respond and I was on vacation and then I forgot, sorry. Using your script and it failed, brought this discussion to my mind again. I think we could decide to change all the templates if it will help to solve the problem and you will be still willing to change your algorithm. Would be wise to contact all the creators of the templates first.
I came back here because the script fails at de:Liste der denkmalgeschützten Objekte in Bichlbach (while it works on other lists). I suppose the reason is the redirection of template {{Denkmalliste Österreich Tabellenzeile (ehemaliges Denkmal)}} to {{Denkmalliste Österreich Tabellenzeile}}. We use this indirection to allow bots to differ between current monuments and former monuments, while avoiding to have a redundant c/p implementation. regards -- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 16:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm trying to use the AddCommonsCatLinks tools in the page National Register of Historic Places listings in Miami-Dade County, Florida. There are links (like Cape Florida Light) with a Commons category linked in the page using the commons template and also in Wikidata, that are not detected: any hints? Thanks, Pietro ( talk) 17:16, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, hi @ Krd:, I found a race condition between scripts that you both do provide. May I ask you to think whether there is a simple solution. The situation is:
There is not a real problem with that, but it could turn out to become one.
Nevertheless, if there is a simple solution, a fix would be highly appreciated. Your tools are both widely used. My preferred solution was to respect the structure of template arguments and change the User:Dudemanfellabra/AddCommonsCatLinks script to not insert the new argument at the bottom of all the template arguments. But this seems to be difficult. Krd, maybe you have an idea how this can be achieved easily. The other solution would be that you Krd relieve the restrictions in order of template arguments. It's up to you folks to find the best solution. thanks -- Herzi Pinki ( talk) 10:36, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that someone else had split the Rock Hill listings out of York County, South Carolina, so I added a few rows to WP:NRHPPROGRESS and added the county WP:NRHPPROGRESS/Duplicates. I have the script running right now to adjust the counts for South Carolina. Is there anything else that needs to be updated when a sublist is split from a county, or did I get everything? TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 04:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
The Savanna-Sabula Bridge spans the Mississippi River between Carroll County IL and Jackson County IA, but until a few minutes ago, it only appeared on the IA list and thus wasn't in any of the multi-state duplication sections of WP:NRHPPROGRESS. Could you please fix this situation and show me what I should have changed? I've added it to National Register of Historic Places listings in Carroll County, Illinois; I just need help with the progress page. Nyttend ( talk) 04:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra! I tried to use your tool at the Czech Wikipedia for monument lists. However, the tool required class='vcard' in the template cs:Šablona:Památky v Česku. Should be something added to the template? -- ŠJů ( talk) 21:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
I added the Czech translation to the discussion page of the tool now.
Btw., when the script fails, the message ("Preferred language unavailable... Checking for matches...) stays hanging on the page and contains no "×" symbol to be closed. Some links from the background page penetrate into the message window. -- ŠJů ( talk) 15:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I tested the tool on the list cs:Seznam kulturních památek v Chomutově. cs:Wikipedie:WikiProjekt Wiki Loves Monuments/Missing commons category links contains 3 commonscat links which should be added to the list. However, your script found no matches. -- ŠJů ( talk) 07:42, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Great work! The function of adding commonscat links works perfectly! I believe, adding of images will work as well. It there will appear some complication, a will contact you again, but I hope, the script is adapted for the Czech wikipedia already. -- ŠJů ( talk) 22:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I was using your Commons script to add a new category to National Register of Historic Places listings in Charleston County, South Carolina, and the script is claiming there's a match for Bleak Hall Plantation Outbuildings but isn't displaying any images or a category. The history of Botany Bay Plantation Wildlife Management Area shows that there was a photo of the site that was deleted in January; I'm not sure if that has anything to do with the problem, but it might be relevant. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 09:32, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hey Dudeman, I've finished processing the NHL lists you converted by script to templates. I did notice that you did not convert List of NHLs in Other, which looks the only NHL list that hasn't been converted to templates yet. Magic ♪piano 15:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Just so you know, I changed the UpdateNRHPProgress script to remove Zavala County, Texas from the list of empty counties, since it now has a listing. Normally I would've asked you first, but since you haven't been active in a few weeks I wanted to make sure the script worked properly in the meantime. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 22:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Just a note to everyone else who's been coming here — I contacted him offline, and he said that he's crazily busy in real life. He's definitely planning to come back when things calm down, when he doesn't need about 48 hours in a day anymore. Nyttend ( talk) 03:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Analyzing both the statistics in the NRHP project progress and the result of vector.js script, you can find county lists (like Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, Escambia, Pasco, Union) apparently fully populated, but declared as incomplete: how to identify the missing articles? Thanks, Pietro ( talk) 14:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the long absence, guys; I've been really busy in real life. The way the script handles these links is by checking if an article is assessed list-class. If it is list-class, there are two outcomes: 1) If "National Register of Historic Places" is in the title, the script counts it as unarticled; 2) otherwise, the script counts it as stub-class. If the article is not list-class, the script just goes with stub or start+ regardless of the title. While yes, this case would be "fixed" by just making the script check for "National Register of Historic Places listings" (note the extra word), I think the better solution for MPS articles would be just to change the assessment of the article to something other than list-class if there is enough information about each site to warrant doing so. That said, though, in this case, the article is a list and thus the assessment should not be changed. There is little to no more information about each individual building on the MPS page than there is in the county list, so I think the listing should be counted as unarticled. Thankfully, TheCatalyst31 has started articles on the sites in question, so this point is irrelevant now, but I agree with the output of the script saying the sites were unarticled until these new articles were created. If anything, I think the script should be modified to check for the words "Thematic Resource/TR" and "Multiple Property Submission/MPS" to count those as unarticled as well.-- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 01:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
I split Madison from the Dane County, Wisconsin list, so you should update your bot script to reflect that before the next time you run it. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 04:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
I just ran the script on National Register of Historic Places listings in Middlesex County, New Jersey, and when it reaches the Goldman House, it suggests an image to add even though that row already has an image. Looking at your code, I'm pretty sure that the bug has something to do with the existing image not being on Commons, since your code seems to only validate existing images by checking if they're on Commons. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 06:06, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
See National Register of Historic Places listings in western Puerto Rico, the script didn't work well on that page, for example on the first row 5, it didn't remove the old coord template. Maybe due to the small that was missing a /small? I reverted the changes the script made to that page. Generic1139 ( talk) 21:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Or maybe not, National Register of Historic Places listings in the Northern Mariana Islands is also wrong, and it had the closing tag. I reverted it as well. Generic1139 ( talk) 21:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry for causing the confusion. I remember this coming up once before, but that was a situation in which I either split a list into two or merged two lists into one. Here, I figured that someone had simply messed up the list, rearranging it in an unhelpful way; I was completely unaware that they were separate entries on NRHPPROGRESS, so if I'd thought about it, I would have assumed that the bot was counting them all together, or that I was undoing a messup that would confuse the bot and thus unconfusing it. Curious, do you have any idea why this list ended up this way? Finally, sorry for the late reply; I've been in Philadelphia for the last couple of days (tons of photos, although almost everything was already illustrated), and I'm at a restaurant 1½ hours from home. If you respond tonight, please be aware that I might not. Nyttend ( talk) 00:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I was planning on trying to find the untagged articles through AWB so they could be tagged; having the extra redirects ends up making that more difficult, so I changed the couple that only had a handful. Found one untagged so far so hasn't been in vain at least. On a side note, by doing this I found that USS Hornet Museum wasn't tagged, but USS Hornet (CV-12) is; I'm not positive which would be the main article for the project and which one should merely be related-importance, if tagged at all. Wizardman 16:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
You might look at the footnotes of Arkansas at WP:NRHPPROGRESS (it seems to be the only one that's weird). Magic ♪piano 02:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
If you go to a nonexistent article's article page (as opposed to the edit tab that automatically loads when you click a redlink), a message pops up saying that NRHPstats could not load the wikitext and has been aborted, which seems unnecessary for a nonexistent page that has no wikitext. It's a pretty low-priority error since most editors with the script won't see it (I only found it thanks to a bad offsite link), but you might want to look into it if it's an easy fix. TheCatalyst31 Reaction• Creation 02:49, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
If you think it's a good idea, would you be willing to implement a suggestion I've made? WT:NRHP#Back to NRHP list missing coords is a proposal that Category:NRHP list missing coordinates be applied only when the coords are missing from a current listing; many of the lists in this category are present only because of one of more former listings without coords. Nyttend ( talk) 01:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Really enjoyed the new set of graphs at Talk:WikiProject NRHP, though I share your regret that we didn't have more data points during the 2013 photo contest. Just so you know, your maps and graphs are definitely helping to spur at least one photographer: when I recently passed through North Carolina, I put in a bit of extra effort when I saw that I could shift the state to a paler shade of blue, and then hit a few extra sites in order to turn one county from deep blue to very light orange. Even if you're not taking photos yourself, you're giving other some great incentive to do so. Thanks! — Ammodramus ( talk) 21:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra. The template {{ Infobox nhsc}} is being proposed for merger into the template {{ Infobox historic site}} that you created in 2009. Unfortunately the instructions at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion fail to mention notifying the creator of the template that is the suggested target of the merge, so discussion has already begun at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 2 #Template:Infobox nhsc. Nevertheless, any input you may make there would be valued. Cheers -- RexxS ( talk) 23:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Dudemanfellabra, how are you doing? I removed the re-addition of the so-called Image of the Concrete Block House (#45) in the National Register of Historic Places listings in Phoenix, Arizona. I have been taking pictures and documenting historical structures of Phoenix for some years now, which I share with Wikipedia and the Arizona Republic. The Concrete Block House which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places was built in 1916 was located in 618-620 N. 4th Ave. The house was demolished and a modern condo was built in 2008 where the historic house once stood. This condo is not listed in the National Register of Historic Places and therefore it would be wrong to have the wrong image placed in the list. Thank you, Tony the Marine ( talk) 03:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)