Hello to all!
Dss971 14:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Dss971
I see you've reinstated this "spoiler warning":
![]() | (Do not read this article if you believe in the Easter Bunny and would be disappointed if you were told he/she is not real.) |
Several points:
I understand where you're coming from; if possible, we should phrase articles like this so that adults understand we're talking about folklore, without going out of our way to ruin things for children. But this should be done through the use of careful phrasing, not spoiler warnings. I've removed this again; it simply doesn't belong in this article. If you still think the article should include a spoiler warning, please seek consensus on Talk:Easter Bunny. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 16:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
David J. O'Reilly has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thanks. —
Animum (
talk)
01:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello to all!
Dss971 14:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Dss971
I see you've reinstated this "spoiler warning":
![]() | (Do not read this article if you believe in the Easter Bunny and would be disappointed if you were told he/she is not real.) |
Several points:
I understand where you're coming from; if possible, we should phrase articles like this so that adults understand we're talking about folklore, without going out of our way to ruin things for children. But this should be done through the use of careful phrasing, not spoiler warnings. I've removed this again; it simply doesn't belong in this article. If you still think the article should include a spoiler warning, please seek consensus on Talk:Easter Bunny. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 16:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
David J. O'Reilly has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thanks. —
Animum (
talk)
01:43, 1 July 2008 (UTC)