Hi Drunkest1, and Please excuse this intrusion as you have been around a bit already but if no one has said it before: Welcome to Wikipedia!

Can you stop replacing 'foreign' with 'commonwealth'. You should know, Canada and Australia were not part of the UK. They had autonomy despite being part of the empire. Dapi89 ( talk) 15:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm reporting your unreasonable behaviour. Dapi89 ( talk) 22:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi Drunkest1, could you please discuss your changes at Talk:De Havilland Mosquito. It seems rather silly to edit war over a single word. Nick-D ( talk) 03:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Nick-D ( talk) 00:17, 4 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Ross McWhirter, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a previous Arbitration Enforcement case that closed in October 2007, and was amended by community consensus in October 2008. The current restrictions are: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions. All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per day). When in doubt, assume it is related. Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first.

The edit you just made is a revert to a previous version, thank you. O Fenian ( talk) 23:58, 2 July 2010 (UTC) reply

You have just breached the 1RR restriction, please revert that edit. Thank you. O Fenian ( talk) 18:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Notice: A discussion of which spelling & usage rules to follow on War of 1812 has been started on Talk:War of 1812. Your views are welcomed. Thank you. -- Shearonink ( talk) 22:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Drunkest1, I noticed that you edited the 'closer in size' caption on the page for Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier. I just wanted to make sure we are working from the same figures. I make it Nimitz Length: 333 m. Invincible Length: 209m. Queen Elizabeth Length: 280m. Mid point between Nimitz and Invincible: 271m. So it is strictly speaking true to say the the Queen Elizabeth Class will be closer in size to a Nimitz, but it will also be considerably smaller. Can you think of any other form of words? Thom2002 ( talk) 07:22, 21 April 2012 (UTC) reply