|
I noticed that you inserted a lot of unreferenced material in this article. Please be aware that insertion of unreferenced material into wikipedia articles without discussion in the talk page are most likely to be reverted. Thanks for your contributions. Docku ( talk) 10:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Bhaiji Ramesh Bhai Oza, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhaiji Ramesh Bhai Oza. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chafford ( talk) 08:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Bhaishri Ramesh Bhai Oza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Excirial (
Talk,
Contribs)
10:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
An article you created, The Indian Board of Alternative Medicines, was tagged by Phlegm Rooster ( talk · contribs) and CorenSearchBot ( talk · contribs) for speedy deletion as per WP:CSD#G12: blatant copyright infringement (www.indiaeducation.ernet.in/insitutions/PROFILE.ASP?no=U00949) and subsequently deleted. — Athaenara ✉ 07:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Dr. Suresh Kumar Agarwal was tagged by Terrifictriffid ( talk · contribs) and CorenSearchBot ( talk · contribs) for speedy deletion as per WP:CSD#G12: blatant copyright infringement (www.drskagarwal.org) and subsequently deleted as well. — Athaenara ✉ 10:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
A page that you have been involved in editing, List of Bhatia gotra, has been listed for deletion; you may wish to participate in the deletion discussion. Thanks. StaticGull Talk 12:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Holy Angels College Of Alternative Medicines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -
Eldereft (
cont.)
14:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Apparently, the user keeps on going creating unnotable articles and dont seem to respond to any of the concerns in his talk page. I would recommend a bigger warning, even a block could be warranted. Docku ( talk) 14:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Holy Angels College Of Alternative Medicines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -
Eldereft (
cont.)
06:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Indian Board of Alternative Medicines, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.indiaeducation.ernet.in/insitutions/PROFILE.ASP?no=U00949. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 10:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Holy Angels College Of Alternative Medicines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -
Eldereft (
cont.)
12:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for creating numerous and repeated copyright violation articles and failing to respond to talk page warnings and questions about your behaviour. Until the latter issue is resolved, you will remain blocked. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS has wasted eight of nine lives 15:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
|
I noticed that you inserted a lot of unreferenced material in this article. Please be aware that insertion of unreferenced material into wikipedia articles without discussion in the talk page are most likely to be reverted. Thanks for your contributions. Docku ( talk) 10:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Bhaiji Ramesh Bhai Oza, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhaiji Ramesh Bhai Oza. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Chafford ( talk) 08:18, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Bhaishri Ramesh Bhai Oza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
Excirial (
Talk,
Contribs)
10:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
An article you created, The Indian Board of Alternative Medicines, was tagged by Phlegm Rooster ( talk · contribs) and CorenSearchBot ( talk · contribs) for speedy deletion as per WP:CSD#G12: blatant copyright infringement (www.indiaeducation.ernet.in/insitutions/PROFILE.ASP?no=U00949) and subsequently deleted. — Athaenara ✉ 07:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Dr. Suresh Kumar Agarwal was tagged by Terrifictriffid ( talk · contribs) and CorenSearchBot ( talk · contribs) for speedy deletion as per WP:CSD#G12: blatant copyright infringement (www.drskagarwal.org) and subsequently deleted as well. — Athaenara ✉ 10:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
A page that you have been involved in editing, List of Bhatia gotra, has been listed for deletion; you may wish to participate in the deletion discussion. Thanks. StaticGull Talk 12:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Holy Angels College Of Alternative Medicines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -
Eldereft (
cont.)
14:05, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Apparently, the user keeps on going creating unnotable articles and dont seem to respond to any of the concerns in his talk page. I would recommend a bigger warning, even a block could be warranted. Docku ( talk) 14:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Holy Angels College Of Alternative Medicines, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -
Eldereft (
cont.)
06:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Indian Board of Alternative Medicines, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.indiaeducation.ernet.in/insitutions/PROFILE.ASP?no=U00949. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 10:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Holy Angels College Of Alternative Medicines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -
Eldereft (
cont.)
12:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for creating numerous and repeated copyright violation articles and failing to respond to talk page warnings and questions about your behaviour. Until the latter issue is resolved, you will remain blocked. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS has wasted eight of nine lives 15:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)