Do u have any references to support your edits?-- Vigyani ( talk) 06:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Bob Khanna, without
verifying it by citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Vigyani (
talk)
06:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- user Gruntfuttock115 is Palamedes PR company. --
Drosslifter (
talk)
07:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- but you can not add the information such as the one you are adding, without references.--
Vigyani (
talk)
07:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- so an article flagged as problematic and created by Palamedes PR is ok. I recommend it for speedy deletion.--
Drosslifter (
talk)
07:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, you can recommend it for speedy deletion. Please read WP:CSD to see the circumstances in which an article can be nominated for speedy deletion. But may I ask you, how you know that the article Bob Khanna is created by a PR company. -- Vigyani ( talk) 07:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- so an article flagged as problematic and created by Palamedes PR is ok. I recommend it for speedy deletion.--
Drosslifter (
talk)
07:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- but you can not add the information such as the one you are adding, without references.--
Vigyani (
talk)
07:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- user Gruntfuttock115 is Palamedes PR company. --
Drosslifter (
talk)
07:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Bob Khanna shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 07:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Do u have any references to support your edits?-- Vigyani ( talk) 06:35, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Bob Khanna, without
verifying it by citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Vigyani (
talk)
06:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- user Gruntfuttock115 is Palamedes PR company. --
Drosslifter (
talk)
07:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- but you can not add the information such as the one you are adding, without references.--
Vigyani (
talk)
07:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- so an article flagged as problematic and created by Palamedes PR is ok. I recommend it for speedy deletion.--
Drosslifter (
talk)
07:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, you can recommend it for speedy deletion. Please read WP:CSD to see the circumstances in which an article can be nominated for speedy deletion. But may I ask you, how you know that the article Bob Khanna is created by a PR company. -- Vigyani ( talk) 07:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- so an article flagged as problematic and created by Palamedes PR is ok. I recommend it for speedy deletion.--
Drosslifter (
talk)
07:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- but you can not add the information such as the one you are adding, without references.--
Vigyani (
talk)
07:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- user Gruntfuttock115 is Palamedes PR company. --
Drosslifter (
talk)
07:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Bob Khanna shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Nomoskedasticity ( talk) 07:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC)