Hello, DrexMafia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Secret Princess, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- ElHef ( Meep?) 21:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The article The Secret Princess has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
ElHef (
Meep?)
21:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Secret Princess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/76011566/the-secret-princess/?ref=kicktraq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Secret Princess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret Princess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- ElHef ( Meep?) 19:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, DrexMafia. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TransTales Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TransTales Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this
recent edit to
The Secret Princess, you removed
Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
20:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop recreating The Secret Princess. You have not provided any additional sources or addressed the concerns that were brought up at the AFD discussion. Recreating the same article in contravention of the consensus that was reached in that discussion is considered disruptive editing. If you continue to do so, it will be reported as such. -- ElHef ( Meep?) 01:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CogitoErgoSum14. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
The Secret Princess, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (
talk)
02:12, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
The Secret Princess with
this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Erebus Morgaine
(Talk)
02:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TheSecretPrincess.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm asking that you please stop re-adding pages and trying to remove AfD templates from Wikipedia. The movie was deleted via an AfD discussion. It doesn't pass our notability guidelines. As nice as it'd be to be able to have an article for the film on Wikipedia, the movie just isn't notable at this point in time. It might never be notable. Most indie films fly under the radar and never gain coverage. I wish that your film did have the coverage since it sounds like fun, but it doesn't. Re-creating the article is considered to be disruptive. Removing the AfD template is also considered to be disruptive and will not stop the AfD from progressing. If the article to TTE is deleted, please do not recreate it. It will only get deleted again and this will likely end with you getting blocked from editing permanently. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Because you live in a small village in Canada does not mean you know what is notable to everyone Certainly Justin Bieber new T Shirt colour is what Wikipedia is for, right?
Stop with your perspective, the world is a bit bigger than you think
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Pleas yourself. I contributed but some of you now own wiki so do what you want. good luck
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DrexMafia. Thank you.
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
07:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:57, 4 September 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, DrexMafia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Secret Princess, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- ElHef ( Meep?) 21:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The article The Secret Princess has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
ElHef (
Meep?)
21:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Secret Princess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/76011566/the-secret-princess/?ref=kicktraq. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:26, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Secret Princess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret Princess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- ElHef ( Meep?) 19:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, DrexMafia. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TransTales Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TransTales Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this
recent edit to
The Secret Princess, you removed
Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
20:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Please stop recreating The Secret Princess. You have not provided any additional sources or addressed the concerns that were brought up at the AFD discussion. Recreating the same article in contravention of the consensus that was reached in that discussion is considered disruptive editing. If you continue to do so, it will be reported as such. -- ElHef ( Meep?) 01:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CogitoErgoSum14. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
The Secret Princess, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (
talk)
02:12, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
The Secret Princess with
this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Erebus Morgaine
(Talk)
02:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TheSecretPrincess.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm asking that you please stop re-adding pages and trying to remove AfD templates from Wikipedia. The movie was deleted via an AfD discussion. It doesn't pass our notability guidelines. As nice as it'd be to be able to have an article for the film on Wikipedia, the movie just isn't notable at this point in time. It might never be notable. Most indie films fly under the radar and never gain coverage. I wish that your film did have the coverage since it sounds like fun, but it doesn't. Re-creating the article is considered to be disruptive. Removing the AfD template is also considered to be disruptive and will not stop the AfD from progressing. If the article to TTE is deleted, please do not recreate it. It will only get deleted again and this will likely end with you getting blocked from editing permanently. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:38, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Because you live in a small village in Canada does not mean you know what is notable to everyone Certainly Justin Bieber new T Shirt colour is what Wikipedia is for, right?
Stop with your perspective, the world is a bit bigger than you think
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs)
10:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Pleas yourself. I contributed but some of you now own wiki so do what you want. good luck
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DrexMafia. Thank you.
Tokyogirl79
(。◕‿◕。)
07:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:57, 4 September 2014 (UTC) |