This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think you are too quickly seeking draft articles and sandboxes for CSD G11 speedy deletion after reviewing them. Some of them, which I untagged, could be improved and clearly the content creators spent time crafting them. I think, except for the most egregious cases, you should pause on tagging pages you review for deletion and allow the editors time to respond to your review comments. Deleting their work, right after submitted it, guarantees that most of these editors will leave the project and not return. While you were correct to decline them, the ones I saw were not irredeemable. Think of these articles as their first efforts as they work to become better editors. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello please how can I edited on my page? -- Masteryucap1 ( talk) 22:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Well the only references that I could find are
and citations for his medals. These seem to me to be pretty reliable references as Denis Barnham was with Michael Le Bas in the RAF in Malta as is the 1st ? Mruthsanderson ( talk) 10:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
How to write an article here? -- Jamso23 ( talk) 05:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Now Review the draft. I think it has enough citation. Thank you in anticipation. Mr. Rasel Hasan ( talk) 17:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Good catch with the picture. Is it a re-creation? If so I believe it can be speeded at Commons. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
I was about to ping you to that one then saw you just accepted it. :) S0091 ( talk) 14:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Your product is amazing -- Akung taramun ( talk) 16:10, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Just trying to learn Wikipedia editing starting with Dhiru Thadani. I have watched his interviews on YouTube and have read about his works. Took details from his website. But he is not visible on any other third party platforms like news publishers. Taking suggestion from you, I have removed parts where references are not available. I have resubmitted it. please check.
Hondapolo ( talk) 06:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I have found that someone called Materials Scientist now reverts my edits with Rollback or Huggle without reading them. I have apparently been labelled a 'vandal'. This is a pity, as the second paragraph of the Nick Kyrgios entry is just the beginning of a very poor section which uses a New Yorker article from 2015 as a major introduction to his bio. It is called "The Reluctant Rising Star of Tennis'. He is no longer a 'rising star'; he is no longer 22; it does not mention who has praised him (it was Federer's coach); or what for (it says his perceived style - as if Federer's coach doesn't have any authority); the opinion piece talks about 'epic rants' without mentioning that these are a feature of all players, racquet smashes which feature in most matches...in fact this is only the beginning of a very poorly written entry featuring too many sections supported only by online tabloid material. If the supervisor now reverts my attempts to edit, there is no point me trying to upgrade the site despite it being so poorly written, ignorant and biased. Kyrgios will retire through injury soon. This is quite commone in elite sports. It's rather sad that Wikipedia is still using material that was written about him when he was a very young sportsperson. SueoftheAntipodes ( talk) 11:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the feedback and comments you provided in my draft. Yesterday, I attempted to search for news related to the terms you mentioned on Google and added them to the first paragraph. I am eager to know if this content is effective. While you mentioned that you prefer not to be contacted to review content on this page, I still sincerely look forward to your corrections and requests. I am also grateful for the opportunity to edit the draft rather than having my page deleted. Thank you~ Additionally, I have a question. During the process of writing this entry, I noticed that the brand itself seems to lack significant coverage in terms of its notability, but the products do. Can I approach this by creating an entry from the product's perspective and use it to support the existence of the brand entry? Draft:SwitchBot Ejajsheik23 ( talk) 03:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I am writing this to you to substantiate the article about Hasan Mohammed Jinnah on Wikipedia. This article is currently listed as lacking substantial references, but I believe that it meets the criteria for inclusion.
He is a state public Prosecutor of TamilNadu, who has widespread media coverage.
The article about him on Wikipedia is a well-written and informative. It covers all of the major aspects of personality and the cases in which he played a crucial role. The article is also well-sourced, with citations to reliable sources such as Tamilnadu Department of Information and Public Relations (DIPR), Madras High court press release.
I believe that the article meets all of the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. It is well-written, informative, and well-sourced. It is also a topic that is of interest to a wide range of people.
I urge you to reconsider the article. I will add his Twitter,Linkedin handle and other sources here. Thank you for your time and consideration.
reference :
Abayan leo ( talk) 06:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
How do I delete a draft? CouchPotato0209 ( talk) 14:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I am mostly interested in philosophy and technology. How do I start editing this articles? -- Lopua ( talk) 09:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Asus password -- ASUSs1000 ( talk) 22:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I'd appreciate it if you would examine my comments on this draft to see whether I have been correct and reasonable, or have been unduly persnickety. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
"persnickety"wielded much these days. That is a pity. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arthurmas may interest you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
A while ago you declined the draft Draft:Shinko-shiki with what I interpreted as a statement that the article was all good but there were not enough sources to establish that it existed. I added a lot more although fundamentally didn't change the article otherwise. Is that good for it? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 22:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Double Grazing I think I have worked out how to fix the inline referencing you asked me for and have resubmitted the draft again. How do I know if it has been returned to you? Or do i just hang ten? Thanks virgobeach.
PS should I have written this here?
Virgobeach (
talk)
08:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello DoubleGrazing:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Rack and pinion Award | ||
This award is given to DoubleGrazing for collecting more than 15 points per week in the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for your continuous contributions to the drive! Hey man im josh ( talk) 01:36, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
This award is given to DoubleGrazing for collecting more than 50 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh ( talk) 01:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
My goodness! I didn't think I had voted yet! Apricate it! -- Dolotta ( talk) 16:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear DoubleGrazing, I've been very busy over the last few months, so it's only now that I'm getting round to working on my draft for " Alice in Wonderland (Neuschwanstein album)" again.
In your rejection of the article, you write that half of the sources mentioned are non-reliable. You mention Blogspot, Wordpress and Discogs.
Firstly, I use a total of 13 sources, one of which is Blogspot, one is Wordpress and 3 are from Discogs. That makes about 38% and not half. I can still understand Blogspot, but what do you have against Wordpress? Wordpress is a CMS system for creating websites. What's wrong with that? Why shouldn't the aforementioned website be a reasonable source? Just because it was written in Wordpress?
Now to Discogs. What's wrong with that? Discogs even exists as a template. So why shouldn't you be able to use this reputable database as a source?
I have removed the blogspot source, Wordpress too, for once. Every paragraph now has a source citation.
Just for your information: The article was originally written by me for the German Wikipedia, then translated for the French and Dutch Wikipedia. There are no problems with the sources in any other WP, although the French, for example, are also very critical.
I would therefore ask you to check the draft again and publish it.
Thank you very much! Mondra Diamond ( talk) 12:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
"Lyhyesti: Vanha patu käy läpi levykokoelmaansa ja horisee, mitä levyistä mieleen juolahtaa."That loosely translates as "Briefly: An old geezer rummages through his record collection and blathers about them whatever pops into his head."
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think you are too quickly seeking draft articles and sandboxes for CSD G11 speedy deletion after reviewing them. Some of them, which I untagged, could be improved and clearly the content creators spent time crafting them. I think, except for the most egregious cases, you should pause on tagging pages you review for deletion and allow the editors time to respond to your review comments. Deleting their work, right after submitted it, guarantees that most of these editors will leave the project and not return. While you were correct to decline them, the ones I saw were not irredeemable. Think of these articles as their first efforts as they work to become better editors. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello please how can I edited on my page? -- Masteryucap1 ( talk) 22:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Well the only references that I could find are
and citations for his medals. These seem to me to be pretty reliable references as Denis Barnham was with Michael Le Bas in the RAF in Malta as is the 1st ? Mruthsanderson ( talk) 10:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
How to write an article here? -- Jamso23 ( talk) 05:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Now Review the draft. I think it has enough citation. Thank you in anticipation. Mr. Rasel Hasan ( talk) 17:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Good catch with the picture. Is it a re-creation? If so I believe it can be speeded at Commons. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
I was about to ping you to that one then saw you just accepted it. :) S0091 ( talk) 14:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello Your product is amazing -- Akung taramun ( talk) 16:10, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Just trying to learn Wikipedia editing starting with Dhiru Thadani. I have watched his interviews on YouTube and have read about his works. Took details from his website. But he is not visible on any other third party platforms like news publishers. Taking suggestion from you, I have removed parts where references are not available. I have resubmitted it. please check.
Hondapolo ( talk) 06:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I have found that someone called Materials Scientist now reverts my edits with Rollback or Huggle without reading them. I have apparently been labelled a 'vandal'. This is a pity, as the second paragraph of the Nick Kyrgios entry is just the beginning of a very poor section which uses a New Yorker article from 2015 as a major introduction to his bio. It is called "The Reluctant Rising Star of Tennis'. He is no longer a 'rising star'; he is no longer 22; it does not mention who has praised him (it was Federer's coach); or what for (it says his perceived style - as if Federer's coach doesn't have any authority); the opinion piece talks about 'epic rants' without mentioning that these are a feature of all players, racquet smashes which feature in most matches...in fact this is only the beginning of a very poorly written entry featuring too many sections supported only by online tabloid material. If the supervisor now reverts my attempts to edit, there is no point me trying to upgrade the site despite it being so poorly written, ignorant and biased. Kyrgios will retire through injury soon. This is quite commone in elite sports. It's rather sad that Wikipedia is still using material that was written about him when he was a very young sportsperson. SueoftheAntipodes ( talk) 11:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the feedback and comments you provided in my draft. Yesterday, I attempted to search for news related to the terms you mentioned on Google and added them to the first paragraph. I am eager to know if this content is effective. While you mentioned that you prefer not to be contacted to review content on this page, I still sincerely look forward to your corrections and requests. I am also grateful for the opportunity to edit the draft rather than having my page deleted. Thank you~ Additionally, I have a question. During the process of writing this entry, I noticed that the brand itself seems to lack significant coverage in terms of its notability, but the products do. Can I approach this by creating an entry from the product's perspective and use it to support the existence of the brand entry? Draft:SwitchBot Ejajsheik23 ( talk) 03:57, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
I am writing this to you to substantiate the article about Hasan Mohammed Jinnah on Wikipedia. This article is currently listed as lacking substantial references, but I believe that it meets the criteria for inclusion.
He is a state public Prosecutor of TamilNadu, who has widespread media coverage.
The article about him on Wikipedia is a well-written and informative. It covers all of the major aspects of personality and the cases in which he played a crucial role. The article is also well-sourced, with citations to reliable sources such as Tamilnadu Department of Information and Public Relations (DIPR), Madras High court press release.
I believe that the article meets all of the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. It is well-written, informative, and well-sourced. It is also a topic that is of interest to a wide range of people.
I urge you to reconsider the article. I will add his Twitter,Linkedin handle and other sources here. Thank you for your time and consideration.
reference :
Abayan leo ( talk) 06:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
How do I delete a draft? CouchPotato0209 ( talk) 14:15, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I am mostly interested in philosophy and technology. How do I start editing this articles? -- Lopua ( talk) 09:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Asus password -- ASUSs1000 ( talk) 22:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I'd appreciate it if you would examine my comments on this draft to see whether I have been correct and reasonable, or have been unduly persnickety. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:17, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
"persnickety"wielded much these days. That is a pity. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arthurmas may interest you. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
A while ago you declined the draft Draft:Shinko-shiki with what I interpreted as a statement that the article was all good but there were not enough sources to establish that it existed. I added a lot more although fundamentally didn't change the article otherwise. Is that good for it? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 22:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Double Grazing I think I have worked out how to fix the inline referencing you asked me for and have resubmitted the draft again. How do I know if it has been returned to you? Or do i just hang ten? Thanks virgobeach.
PS should I have written this here?
Virgobeach (
talk)
08:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello DoubleGrazing:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Rack and pinion Award | ||
This award is given to DoubleGrazing for collecting more than 15 points per week in the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for your continuous contributions to the drive! Hey man im josh ( talk) 01:36, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
This award is given to DoubleGrazing for collecting more than 50 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh ( talk) 01:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
My goodness! I didn't think I had voted yet! Apricate it! -- Dolotta ( talk) 16:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear DoubleGrazing, I've been very busy over the last few months, so it's only now that I'm getting round to working on my draft for " Alice in Wonderland (Neuschwanstein album)" again.
In your rejection of the article, you write that half of the sources mentioned are non-reliable. You mention Blogspot, Wordpress and Discogs.
Firstly, I use a total of 13 sources, one of which is Blogspot, one is Wordpress and 3 are from Discogs. That makes about 38% and not half. I can still understand Blogspot, but what do you have against Wordpress? Wordpress is a CMS system for creating websites. What's wrong with that? Why shouldn't the aforementioned website be a reasonable source? Just because it was written in Wordpress?
Now to Discogs. What's wrong with that? Discogs even exists as a template. So why shouldn't you be able to use this reputable database as a source?
I have removed the blogspot source, Wordpress too, for once. Every paragraph now has a source citation.
Just for your information: The article was originally written by me for the German Wikipedia, then translated for the French and Dutch Wikipedia. There are no problems with the sources in any other WP, although the French, for example, are also very critical.
I would therefore ask you to check the draft again and publish it.
Thank you very much! Mondra Diamond ( talk) 12:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
"Lyhyesti: Vanha patu käy läpi levykokoelmaansa ja horisee, mitä levyistä mieleen juolahtaa."That loosely translates as "Briefly: An old geezer rummages through his record collection and blathers about them whatever pops into his head."