![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Archive 12 starting with closed talk page threads starting March 23, 2016
Way back when you said something about my edit to his page, can you go into more detail — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.85.204.28 ( talk) 19:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Donner60 - you beat me to the punch. i am working on sourcing the material already on this page. and i guess i made a rookie, mistake by editing live. sorry. i'll try to recreate my work when time allows. Is there a way to revert? I already had references entered, that i need to be linked to the amended text. it would be easier to continue on my path. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakfeathr ( talk • contribs) 22:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC) -k — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakfeathr ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Looks like I beat you to the
revert, and in return you beat me to the
report
![]() |
I received your message concerning the edit I made on one of the Desperate Housewives episode pages. Granted, it was a little silly and pretty inconsequential, but I was merely correcting a misquote from the episode. Wikipedia should strive to be as accurate and trustworthy as possible, and watching the episode or even searching the quote in Google would show that incorrect information was being displayed that you put back into place by reverting my edit. Again, the edit was very small and inconsequential, I don't care enough to go back and change it, but please think a little in the future before making a decision that could potentially display false information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.37.27 ( talk) 02:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, re your revert, can you please revert again, ie back to the last edit by Vjbxk? Thanks JennyOz ( talk) 02:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Kudpung's talk page.
03:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Dear Donner60, Firstly, I would like to thank you for taking action against the IP address who has been harassing me on the page for the Kalmyk Anthem. That being said, I still require help regarding that page. The full details are listed in my entry on the discussion page for Wikiproject Russia ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia). However, the perpetrator refuses to cease their actions and has resorted to switching computers after your warning. I therefore request additional aid. I know the culprit's Youtube account and while I have tried to contact them, they refuse to cease their actions.
I therefore request that something be done. If required, I can prove that the translation of the lyrics for the Kalmyk anthem that I provided is more suitable, using my rudimentary knowledge of Kalmyk (and the opinions of my Kalmyk friends). I know for a fact that the perpetrator does not know any Kalmyk.
I will check your talk page for a reply.
122.132.199.88 ( talk) 16:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Donner60, I saw you reverted my edits ( Leap Manifesto) and suggested me to See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. I have just read this article, however I am not sure to understand why my edits will be considered a means of promotion because the Leap Manifesto is a set of 15 demands and I simply added what those demands are. Would you please explain me? karambache —Preceding undated comment added 04:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Donner60, I am editing the Food Waste wiki page for a class. I think it would be wise to add a section about what people can do to personally reduce their food waste. My college, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, has had repeated efforts in food waste campaigns, as well as advising "14 Ways Consumers Can Reduce Food Waste."
FrancescaG&AlannaJ ( talk) 02:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)FrancescaG&AlannaJ
Hi Donner60, I saw you reverted my edit. I had added a URL to an article on the Hotel Indigo brand. The article lists all of the individual hotels, many of which have a link to the individual hotel posted next to their name. I just added another one. If you feel that there shouldn't be a link next to the hotel why did you not remove all the ones that are already there? I think it ads great value to all readers to be able to find these hotels and not having to search for each individually. After all this is Wikipedia! :) Revell ( talk) 02:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Donner60, I just received your message. I will explain my reasons of that change and sorry If I not did it after...I'm principiant here;) I made a new sections putting there executives of football teams named in the list of Panama Papers and this is way in somewhere, as Josep Lluís Nuéz or the president of Cstellón were removed..but they are in the new sections. I have another question, why you removed Mr. De Sousa in the section of business people? He was the president of Pescanova, the most important fishing company in Spain.
I hope that this can help you to understand my changes and sorry If I did something wrong
Albert, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsoriano97 ( talk • contribs) 23:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Donner60, Hello. Name is John. I am a relatively new user but am learned in the area of alcoholic beverages and foods. My several edits to the article on Époisses is not a test, but I am in the middle of the edit when I got your note and haven't yet inserted my sources. The current article is seriously out of date in that it identifies Époisses as necessarily an unpasteurized cheese, which it isn't at present, and omits any reference to the reason pasteurization is now required for this cheese when sold in the USA, which is the risk of a potentially serious or even fatal disease called listeriosis. There are other edits which would be advisable, IMO.
If there's a better way, like the sandbox you refer to, to handle in-process work, I'll try to learn to use it. I see that making changes piecemeal without giving citations when they are complex will cause confusion, but didn't think of that. Let me go back and work on the article again and try to copy it to the sandbox first, and I'll ask questions if I'm in trouble. Shouldn't be too hard!
Hope I've figured out how to communicate with you properly! 2602:306:8BAA:4EF0:299F:37F9:E69F:4B7C ( talk) 22:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I now have copied the article (as I have currently left it) to the sandbox, and so you should feel free to revert all edits for now. I've gotta run and will be back on line later!! 2602:306:8BAA:4EF0:299F:37F9:E69F:4B7C ( talk) 22:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
One further thing: is there a system for mentoring new users like myself? 2602:306:8BAA:4EF0:299F:37F9:E69F:4B7C ( talk) 22:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I am Pda4ever, I'm not sure what I am doing so let me apologize if it's wrong. Please do not remove my article /info/en/?search=Inkshares I did copy an paste things from their site, but I was unaware that I could not do that. Now that I know I will not make the same mistake. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pda4ever ( talk • contribs) 04:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey, Donner60, I'd like to request that you still keep your eyes on AnnaSophia Robb – it looks like we're still going to have problems, even with semi-protection, as we still have new, recently autoconfirmed editors causing problems over there... Thanks! -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Donner, my edit is not meant as vandalism, he really does have world record for biggest penis, see Jonah Falcon
Donner, Please read the edit that you have reinstituted. You have vandalized the article in question because I reverted the vandalism. I am reverting your revert and please read the edit before putting trash (read vandalism) back in the BLP. Thank you. (For the record: this was added by User:2602:306:ce98:1510:4cef:d74c:d98c:4a0e.)
Hello Donner60. I am sorry for adding that edit about Mark Damiter to the page. Many people believe me when saying that this edit deserves to be here. All of the facts are 100% true. I am a new user, and do not know how to add citations. I asked my friends to help, and even Mark Damiter himself. He said "This is a great article. I am glad to be appreciated after serving 30 years here. Once again, I am sorry for adding that artice, but I am asking for a favor, and to let this edit be as it is for the time being. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeshmo223 ( talk • contribs) 02:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Donner and thank you for reverting the recent unhelpful edits to Rio Conchos (film). IP addresses in the 67.44 range have been damaging Western film articles regularly for several months. Incomplete details are at User:Certes/Western if you're interested or want to suggest any further action. Thanks again, Certes ( talk) 00:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for those useful comments and for tiding up the instances I'd missed. I started out adding uw-vandalism warnings but this editor clearly has dynamic IP and I gave up as he'd never see my messages. He may have seen last night's, as we were online at the same time (I got an edit conflict on my first attempt to warn). I notice that the same IP has undone the damage in a few cases. This could be a case of a young Paw Patrol fan playing with Mom or Pop's computer, where Mom/Pop is a good-faith IP editor who occasionally notices the kid's efforts and tidies up for us. Certes ( talk) 09:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/67.44.208.145 has appeared. I'm not sure IP edits actually qualify as sock puppetry but the problem may get relisted somewhere more appropriate. Certes ( talk) 09:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Donner60,
According to your message, I made an incorrect modification on that page. I still do not understand why. Could you please explain me. In section Ranking/Criteria, it is currently written the following:
To support my modification, you can check the same page in other languages:
All of them say "divide by 40 and multiply by 10". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.65.240.68 ( talk) 09:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
An anonymous person ("Rohan" in the talk page) has repeatedly changed a biography of my father, Frederick S. Jaffe, to add unsubstantiated interpretation regarding a 1969 memo he wrote, as well as adding references to a site, "The Jaffe Memo: A Sinister Agenda on a Single Page", which pushes his political agenda. Since the memo, or rather a single table from it, has been the source of controversy I added that section to the bio with a short statement of the facts of the matter and a link to the original memo, so readers can judge for themselves. I can give you more background if you are interested. I didn't realize I had to document changes initially and I apologize for that. However, as you can see on the talk page I feel I have carefully explained the edits since I was made aware of this policy.
Thank you, Dave Jaffe DaveJaffe ( talk) 03:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing me to the edit summary. I will use that as well as the talk page going forward. DaveJaffe ( talk) 03:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Donner for your help. I have never hidden the fact that Fred Jaffe was my father unlike Anonymous who has never divulged his identity. I have pointed out to Anonymous a much better Wikipedia page to place his comments but his main goal is to have a link to the "The Jaffe Memo: A Sinister Agenda on a Single Page" website on the Frederick Jaffe bio page. How do we engage someone from Wikipedia to decide this? Thanks, Dave DaveJaffe ( talk) 18:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
You recently reverted my edit. I had undone a revision that was likely the product of urban legend. There is no such word as "clitaris" (or "clitares"), whether bathing suit-related or otherwise. This is discussed in the article's Talk page. Since the word in the song is contested, the previous phrasing was preferable. -- 2600:1008:B027:FDAC:5980:1AD4:B2A9:E1B9 ( talk) 02:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey,
I saw that during the last days you replaced lots of findagrave-templates with direct links. As far as I can see the template is both easier and needs less space than the direct link. Maybe I missed something, so why are you changing it? ... GELongstreet ( talk) 07:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
So i saw that you changed the info of Mois Katumba, how do you know that his Mother is Congolese? Candace black ( talk) 22:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi I saw that you left me a message, about removing my part on a wiki page. Is there anyway I can recover what I wrote? My computer isn't working right and I wasn't able to save what I wrote. Is there a way to recover it and then add my citation?
Thanks, Kim Ianora — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimianora ( talk • contribs) 04:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Removed source content are not related to the Gija Myth. Source does not mention Gija, and these events are at least four centuries apart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.120.20.13 ( talk) 04:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that nasty edit to my talk page. I appreciate it. -- Cameron11598 (Converse) 02:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey Donner60, I apologize if my edit seems biased - that was the exact opposite of my intention! I love Wikipedia and care deeply about it remaining as bias-free as possible. That's why I bothered to sign up to edit this article in the first place and that's why I'm sitting here at 2 am writing you this response.
Someone posted this article on a Facebook group page for humanism today and the local populace was up in arms about how misleading it is. I think my edits might seem biased at first glance because the article is already so biased in the opposite direction. My intention is to bring it back to the center.
My primary concern with the summary of this article is that it focuses entirely on a supposed (and not cited) "consensus" view of "scholars", yet entirely omits Hitler's own voice from the discussion. I present to you the following wikiquote page: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler
There are 84,362 characters of sappy Hilter quotes about his faith and affinity for Catholicism on this page alone, and not even one of his public statements suggests that he is "not a Christian" - the opposite, in fact! My favorite: "I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so." - Adolf Hitler, 1941
By his own account, Hitler was a devout Christian. This is not just some historian's opinion. It is verifiable fact. Now, perhaps his faith was just a convenient political tool, sure. But this article summary completely omits it. Instead the author has chosen to exploit the cherry-picked speculations of cherry-picked authors to build a narrative that is exactly the opposite of Hitler's own words.
Now, I'm more than willing to listen to what these various scholars have to say, but not even a single sentence is provided to Hitler's own voice. Seems to me there is no more authoritative source on Hitler's religion than Hitler himself. He should at least be given equal-footing in the introduction of the article, and I think a strong argument can be made that he should be the centerpiece (it is, after all, an article about him).
Finally, on a side note, I take issue with the opening claim that there is a "consensus" view among "scholars". Which scholars, exactly? There is no evidence cited for this claim. I assure you, no such consensus exists among humanist scholars. Ask Christopher Hitchens:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8VFFW0sbF4
I am new here on Wikipedia. This is my first edit so I don't really know how to proceed forward. Any guidance you can provide would be much appreciated. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naplesmedellin ( talk • contribs) 07:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey, Donner 60, the William Weld edit was an attempt to undo a total hack job on his wiki page. You need to erase all changes made in the last 3 hours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.169.206 ( talk) 02:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm new to this, so please be gentle.
You asked on my talk page about why I deleted some content without providing an explanation. I did provide an explanation. I chose the option "(Undid revision 720987820 by Blackhammer27 (talk) Reverting vandalism or test edit)" from the edit page.
The change page is URL https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jonathan%20Tah&diff=720987971 Carlroddam ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This is a courtesy notification as the filer failed to notify you.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
03:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a highly active Huggle user (top 20, actually). The Wikimedia Collaboration Team is researching a project that we hope will be useful to people who use Huggle and others engaged in edit-review and anti-vandalism. Using artificial intelligence programming (in ORES) and other means, we believe we can create feeds of Recent Changes that are better tailored to the type of work you do, helping you to be more effective and efficient. (The technology will have other benefits as well, which we can talk about.)
We're in the early stages of planning this and want to speak with people like yourself to better understand your work, goals and issues. If you’re interested in helping, I’d like to set up a time to meet by video conference, so that you can explain and demonstrate (via screensharing) some of your workflows, and we can ask and answer any questions.
To participate, please email the following information to me, jmatazzoniwikimedia.org, or send it to designresearch
wikimedia.org:
Thanks! JMatazzoni (WMF) ( talk) 19:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For your tireless work fending off the vandals and imageboard attacks. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 03:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
This is a message about my deleted edits to the John McDougall page. What I did was (1) delete 2 sentences which were obviously biased and complete duplicates of each other and (2) added a counter-citation to add balance to the previous negative citation. If the goal is unbiased objectivity then what I did was further that. I have nothing to do with the subject other than currently reading some of the McDougall's materials and that is why the original Wikipedia article stood out as blatantly ugly and biased. Isn't a neutral, objective and unbiased post preferable? Doug Lerner ( talk) 03:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)douglerner
I appreciate your taking my intent into consideration. I apologize if I am not entering this correctly as I am not used to this feature. Thank you. Doug Lerner ( talk) 03:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey Donner, This is in regards to the International Islamic propagation centre page which I have updated. We would like to create a new Page for Muhammad Shaikh & it does not allow to do so since his name is already mentioned in International Islamic propagation centre. Kindly help what should I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vansonclose ( talk • contribs) 22:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your time -- no worries 68.13.222.11 ( talk) 01:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
You deleted the following for "vandalism" on Demagogue?
On ITV’s “ Good Morning Britain” on Tuesday, Stephen Hawking referred to Donald Trump as "a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator.” and that he "can't" understand his popularity. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
Hi Donner60, I'm really blown away by this editor world and all that's happening behind the scenes of an article. In my mediocre college education, professors always tried to discredit Wikipedia as a site where "everyone could just make an entry". I am blown away and clicked through layers and layers of edits and I truly stand in awe with what I just discovered here.
Concerning my edit: I apologize if I might have recklessly broken one of the Wiki-policies, but I couldn't help but notice that the article said "unsystemic" instead of "unsystematic".
Best wishes,
68.111.190.72 ( talk) 06:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Trésor
I just like to say that those DVDs are fake, the real ones aren't. And yeah, keep the change that I did a minute ago, OK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.191.252.240 ( talk) 19:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Why did you blank this page. This is a textbook case of nonsense and should have been tagged as {{ db-g1}}. No blanking needed. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 21:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to have done so without an explanation. I spotted what I believe was an attempt at manipulation (arguably NPOV) on a "climate skeptics" and thus reverted the edit. I'll leave it to you to decide to leave it in or out.
Link to apparent attempt at manipulation: https://www.reddit.com/r/climateskeptics/comments/4lx550/body_of_proof_large_number_of_studies_show/d3s4o4n
I have an archive.is link as well (5GGLT after the slash) in case it gets deleted/edited. 74.56.190.125 ( talk) 21:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
(message deleted)
Hi Donner60, I just saw your message of 03:14, 31 May 2016 about the reverted edit for this page. This was not a test edit after all, just a small one to correct a small mistake in the one of the types of meat that was being cooked in that episode (which I happened to have been watching at the time). [1] Astrosnapper ( talk) 04:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [1] (Season 3 Episode 2 on Google Play (probably not a proper source).
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks! 20:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for restoring the content! Silly me! Sorry about that:) Trustworthybastile ( talk) 02:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your anti-vandalism work on Top Model-related articles! :D Linguist 111 talk 04:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thank you for improving wikipedia :) HorseHeadMask ( talk) 01:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC) |
You sent me a message saying that I edited or vandalized a page called KnightOwl; however I made no such edit. This is a private computer. Is it possible someone spoofed my IP address? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.65.9 ( talk) 02:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for undoing the changes to my userpage. Jllm06 ( talk) 12:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome. Donner60 ( talk) 21:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, regarding that revert you spoke to me about: I did further research and found that I was inaccurate. I will leave your revert as it is and not make any more edits. Thanks! :)
DrForbidden ( talk) 05:29, 14 July 2016 (UTC)DrForbidden
Regarding the deletion of Goodland and Anhang (2009) from the Methane entry --- from page 14 of their article: "Further work is needed to recalibrate methane emissions other than those attributable to livestock products using a 20-year timeframe." Given that the FAO originally used the 100-year GWPs, this indeed means that Goodland and Anhang are using the 20-year GWP for methane from livestock and the 100-year GWP for methane from all other anthropogenic sources.This is obvious if you follow their adjustment. OnceJolly ( talk) 04:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
The "recalibration" is a trivial calculation which suggests that its the authors that have the agenda. In any case, I've left the reference to the article and added a further reference to a more recent study from the FAO. OnceJolly ( talk) 05:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your comment on that IP's talk page here [1]. Unfortunately, he/she does not seem to take in consideration anything on his talk. He/she started adding (or changing) random unsourced birth/death dates few days ago, then randomly changing nationalities (English/Scottish -> British; England -> United Kingdom) or adding USA after an American state. Khruner ( talk) 13:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
About your edit here [2]: please note that your edit summary describing the edit you reverted as "unexplained" was wrong – the previous edit by Odabade90 [3] clearly had a talkpage link in its edit summary [4], which does point to an explanation of this edit. I'm not saying the edit was objectively good or justified (no opinion either way); I'd just like everybody to be extra careful to engage in constructive discussion before new revert-wars erupt on that article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm User 72.198.49.108. What I wanted to say is that this isn't my opinion but a historical event. I didn't mean any harm, but I only wanted to report the facts so I edited it with a balanced, neutral point of view. If I made a mistake then please leave me a note on my talk page. Thank you. 72.198.49.108 ( talk) 02:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | |
hero of reviewing | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 186 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Thank you. You have made many wonderful contributions to the project. I always have appreciated the recognition from you and am flattered to receive this further notice. Donner60 ( talk) 06:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi i accidentally removed some stuff then added it back while adding another row. Can u delete what u added now cuz i cant n i dont wanna mess it up. Thanks👍🏼😬 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.2.124.74 ( talk) 03:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
You keep undoing my changes to West Coast Hip-Hop. The Oakland section says "known locally as Oaktown". "Oaktown is an antiquated term that natives stopped using around 1994. Oakland is referred to by natives as "The Town", because San Francisco is known as "The City". Due to gentrification and the rising influx of transplants relocating to Oakland, many newer residents have resurrected the term "Oaktown" however when one uses this term, it's a dead giveaway that they are in fact neither from Oakland nor grew up in Oakland. In addition you undid my changes to San Francisco. The City is not known locally as "San Fran". In fact, the term "San Fran" is universally hated among nearly all Bay Area natives. "Frisco" is looked down upon too, but rappers like JT the Bigga Figga and RBL Posse have referred to The City as "Frisco" in their songs. In urban cultures, SF is also known as "Sucka Free City", a phrase made popular by rappers Rappin' 4-Tay, San Quinn and JT the Bigga Figga. The slang term is what inspired the title of the 2004 movie Sucker Free City which was written by San Francisco native Alex Tse.
Hi Donner60! I just wanted to let you know that the article was blanked by its creator. I went ahead and reverted your and added the G7 tag. Hope you're doing well, and I hope you have a great rest of your day. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Oshwah: Thanks. I missed that one so I am glad you caught it. And a good day to you as well! Donner60 ( talk) 01:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Sorry if my recent edit appeared to be unconstructive, but I was just trying to keep a bit of consistent terminology on A-League in regards to the word "soccer". Also, this is a shared IP address, so those other edits weren't done by me. 138.44.177.178 ( talk) 01:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
You just sent me a message saying you removed a link I submitted but I have never done such a thing? I have password protected wifi so I don't know what happened...It certainly wasn't anyone in my house, they would never be able to figure out how to use wikipedia... 23.240.189.22 ( talk) 08:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
please take a look on follow web page : http://mymultiplesclerosis.co.uk/eat/saccharin-diet-fat/ which talk about Saccharin v Stevia Comparison , test result show Saccharin can cause high blood glucose levels !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.149.179.240 ( talk) 02:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Heelo. I am sorry. It seems that you deleted my commentary on the article tomb of Genghis Khan. I am not a specialist of this subject, but my commentary was very simple : as I said, there were no Jesuits in the 15th century. So I reacted to this misinformation. I think that this information should be checked and source verified in order to improve accuracy. Sorry, but I can't do it. Good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.241.210.129 ( talk) 23:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Archive 12 starting with closed talk page threads starting March 23, 2016
Way back when you said something about my edit to his page, can you go into more detail — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.85.204.28 ( talk) 19:45, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Donner60 - you beat me to the punch. i am working on sourcing the material already on this page. and i guess i made a rookie, mistake by editing live. sorry. i'll try to recreate my work when time allows. Is there a way to revert? I already had references entered, that i need to be linked to the amended text. it would be easier to continue on my path. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakfeathr ( talk • contribs) 22:39, 29 March 2016 (UTC) -k — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakfeathr ( talk • contribs) 22:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Looks like I beat you to the
revert, and in return you beat me to the
report
![]() |
I received your message concerning the edit I made on one of the Desperate Housewives episode pages. Granted, it was a little silly and pretty inconsequential, but I was merely correcting a misquote from the episode. Wikipedia should strive to be as accurate and trustworthy as possible, and watching the episode or even searching the quote in Google would show that incorrect information was being displayed that you put back into place by reverting my edit. Again, the edit was very small and inconsequential, I don't care enough to go back and change it, but please think a little in the future before making a decision that could potentially display false information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.37.27 ( talk) 02:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, re your revert, can you please revert again, ie back to the last edit by Vjbxk? Thanks JennyOz ( talk) 02:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at Kudpung's talk page.
03:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Dear Donner60, Firstly, I would like to thank you for taking action against the IP address who has been harassing me on the page for the Kalmyk Anthem. That being said, I still require help regarding that page. The full details are listed in my entry on the discussion page for Wikiproject Russia ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia). However, the perpetrator refuses to cease their actions and has resorted to switching computers after your warning. I therefore request additional aid. I know the culprit's Youtube account and while I have tried to contact them, they refuse to cease their actions.
I therefore request that something be done. If required, I can prove that the translation of the lyrics for the Kalmyk anthem that I provided is more suitable, using my rudimentary knowledge of Kalmyk (and the opinions of my Kalmyk friends). I know for a fact that the perpetrator does not know any Kalmyk.
I will check your talk page for a reply.
122.132.199.88 ( talk) 16:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Donner60, I saw you reverted my edits ( Leap Manifesto) and suggested me to See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. I have just read this article, however I am not sure to understand why my edits will be considered a means of promotion because the Leap Manifesto is a set of 15 demands and I simply added what those demands are. Would you please explain me? karambache —Preceding undated comment added 04:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Donner60, I am editing the Food Waste wiki page for a class. I think it would be wise to add a section about what people can do to personally reduce their food waste. My college, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, has had repeated efforts in food waste campaigns, as well as advising "14 Ways Consumers Can Reduce Food Waste."
FrancescaG&AlannaJ ( talk) 02:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)FrancescaG&AlannaJ
Hi Donner60, I saw you reverted my edit. I had added a URL to an article on the Hotel Indigo brand. The article lists all of the individual hotels, many of which have a link to the individual hotel posted next to their name. I just added another one. If you feel that there shouldn't be a link next to the hotel why did you not remove all the ones that are already there? I think it ads great value to all readers to be able to find these hotels and not having to search for each individually. After all this is Wikipedia! :) Revell ( talk) 02:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Donner60, I just received your message. I will explain my reasons of that change and sorry If I not did it after...I'm principiant here;) I made a new sections putting there executives of football teams named in the list of Panama Papers and this is way in somewhere, as Josep Lluís Nuéz or the president of Cstellón were removed..but they are in the new sections. I have another question, why you removed Mr. De Sousa in the section of business people? He was the president of Pescanova, the most important fishing company in Spain.
I hope that this can help you to understand my changes and sorry If I did something wrong
Albert, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alsoriano97 ( talk • contribs) 23:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Donner60, Hello. Name is John. I am a relatively new user but am learned in the area of alcoholic beverages and foods. My several edits to the article on Époisses is not a test, but I am in the middle of the edit when I got your note and haven't yet inserted my sources. The current article is seriously out of date in that it identifies Époisses as necessarily an unpasteurized cheese, which it isn't at present, and omits any reference to the reason pasteurization is now required for this cheese when sold in the USA, which is the risk of a potentially serious or even fatal disease called listeriosis. There are other edits which would be advisable, IMO.
If there's a better way, like the sandbox you refer to, to handle in-process work, I'll try to learn to use it. I see that making changes piecemeal without giving citations when they are complex will cause confusion, but didn't think of that. Let me go back and work on the article again and try to copy it to the sandbox first, and I'll ask questions if I'm in trouble. Shouldn't be too hard!
Hope I've figured out how to communicate with you properly! 2602:306:8BAA:4EF0:299F:37F9:E69F:4B7C ( talk) 22:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I now have copied the article (as I have currently left it) to the sandbox, and so you should feel free to revert all edits for now. I've gotta run and will be back on line later!! 2602:306:8BAA:4EF0:299F:37F9:E69F:4B7C ( talk) 22:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
One further thing: is there a system for mentoring new users like myself? 2602:306:8BAA:4EF0:299F:37F9:E69F:4B7C ( talk) 22:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I am Pda4ever, I'm not sure what I am doing so let me apologize if it's wrong. Please do not remove my article /info/en/?search=Inkshares I did copy an paste things from their site, but I was unaware that I could not do that. Now that I know I will not make the same mistake. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pda4ever ( talk • contribs) 04:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey, Donner60, I'd like to request that you still keep your eyes on AnnaSophia Robb – it looks like we're still going to have problems, even with semi-protection, as we still have new, recently autoconfirmed editors causing problems over there... Thanks! -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Donner, my edit is not meant as vandalism, he really does have world record for biggest penis, see Jonah Falcon
Donner, Please read the edit that you have reinstituted. You have vandalized the article in question because I reverted the vandalism. I am reverting your revert and please read the edit before putting trash (read vandalism) back in the BLP. Thank you. (For the record: this was added by User:2602:306:ce98:1510:4cef:d74c:d98c:4a0e.)
Hello Donner60. I am sorry for adding that edit about Mark Damiter to the page. Many people believe me when saying that this edit deserves to be here. All of the facts are 100% true. I am a new user, and do not know how to add citations. I asked my friends to help, and even Mark Damiter himself. He said "This is a great article. I am glad to be appreciated after serving 30 years here. Once again, I am sorry for adding that artice, but I am asking for a favor, and to let this edit be as it is for the time being. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeshmo223 ( talk • contribs) 02:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Donner and thank you for reverting the recent unhelpful edits to Rio Conchos (film). IP addresses in the 67.44 range have been damaging Western film articles regularly for several months. Incomplete details are at User:Certes/Western if you're interested or want to suggest any further action. Thanks again, Certes ( talk) 00:11, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for those useful comments and for tiding up the instances I'd missed. I started out adding uw-vandalism warnings but this editor clearly has dynamic IP and I gave up as he'd never see my messages. He may have seen last night's, as we were online at the same time (I got an edit conflict on my first attempt to warn). I notice that the same IP has undone the damage in a few cases. This could be a case of a young Paw Patrol fan playing with Mom or Pop's computer, where Mom/Pop is a good-faith IP editor who occasionally notices the kid's efforts and tidies up for us. Certes ( talk) 09:03, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/67.44.208.145 has appeared. I'm not sure IP edits actually qualify as sock puppetry but the problem may get relisted somewhere more appropriate. Certes ( talk) 09:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Donner60,
According to your message, I made an incorrect modification on that page. I still do not understand why. Could you please explain me. In section Ranking/Criteria, it is currently written the following:
To support my modification, you can check the same page in other languages:
All of them say "divide by 40 and multiply by 10". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.65.240.68 ( talk) 09:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
An anonymous person ("Rohan" in the talk page) has repeatedly changed a biography of my father, Frederick S. Jaffe, to add unsubstantiated interpretation regarding a 1969 memo he wrote, as well as adding references to a site, "The Jaffe Memo: A Sinister Agenda on a Single Page", which pushes his political agenda. Since the memo, or rather a single table from it, has been the source of controversy I added that section to the bio with a short statement of the facts of the matter and a link to the original memo, so readers can judge for themselves. I can give you more background if you are interested. I didn't realize I had to document changes initially and I apologize for that. However, as you can see on the talk page I feel I have carefully explained the edits since I was made aware of this policy.
Thank you, Dave Jaffe DaveJaffe ( talk) 03:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing me to the edit summary. I will use that as well as the talk page going forward. DaveJaffe ( talk) 03:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Donner for your help. I have never hidden the fact that Fred Jaffe was my father unlike Anonymous who has never divulged his identity. I have pointed out to Anonymous a much better Wikipedia page to place his comments but his main goal is to have a link to the "The Jaffe Memo: A Sinister Agenda on a Single Page" website on the Frederick Jaffe bio page. How do we engage someone from Wikipedia to decide this? Thanks, Dave DaveJaffe ( talk) 18:22, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
You recently reverted my edit. I had undone a revision that was likely the product of urban legend. There is no such word as "clitaris" (or "clitares"), whether bathing suit-related or otherwise. This is discussed in the article's Talk page. Since the word in the song is contested, the previous phrasing was preferable. -- 2600:1008:B027:FDAC:5980:1AD4:B2A9:E1B9 ( talk) 02:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey,
I saw that during the last days you replaced lots of findagrave-templates with direct links. As far as I can see the template is both easier and needs less space than the direct link. Maybe I missed something, so why are you changing it? ... GELongstreet ( talk) 07:19, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
So i saw that you changed the info of Mois Katumba, how do you know that his Mother is Congolese? Candace black ( talk) 22:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi I saw that you left me a message, about removing my part on a wiki page. Is there anyway I can recover what I wrote? My computer isn't working right and I wasn't able to save what I wrote. Is there a way to recover it and then add my citation?
Thanks, Kim Ianora — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimianora ( talk • contribs) 04:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Removed source content are not related to the Gija Myth. Source does not mention Gija, and these events are at least four centuries apart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.120.20.13 ( talk) 04:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that nasty edit to my talk page. I appreciate it. -- Cameron11598 (Converse) 02:54, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey Donner60, I apologize if my edit seems biased - that was the exact opposite of my intention! I love Wikipedia and care deeply about it remaining as bias-free as possible. That's why I bothered to sign up to edit this article in the first place and that's why I'm sitting here at 2 am writing you this response.
Someone posted this article on a Facebook group page for humanism today and the local populace was up in arms about how misleading it is. I think my edits might seem biased at first glance because the article is already so biased in the opposite direction. My intention is to bring it back to the center.
My primary concern with the summary of this article is that it focuses entirely on a supposed (and not cited) "consensus" view of "scholars", yet entirely omits Hitler's own voice from the discussion. I present to you the following wikiquote page: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler
There are 84,362 characters of sappy Hilter quotes about his faith and affinity for Catholicism on this page alone, and not even one of his public statements suggests that he is "not a Christian" - the opposite, in fact! My favorite: "I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so." - Adolf Hitler, 1941
By his own account, Hitler was a devout Christian. This is not just some historian's opinion. It is verifiable fact. Now, perhaps his faith was just a convenient political tool, sure. But this article summary completely omits it. Instead the author has chosen to exploit the cherry-picked speculations of cherry-picked authors to build a narrative that is exactly the opposite of Hitler's own words.
Now, I'm more than willing to listen to what these various scholars have to say, but not even a single sentence is provided to Hitler's own voice. Seems to me there is no more authoritative source on Hitler's religion than Hitler himself. He should at least be given equal-footing in the introduction of the article, and I think a strong argument can be made that he should be the centerpiece (it is, after all, an article about him).
Finally, on a side note, I take issue with the opening claim that there is a "consensus" view among "scholars". Which scholars, exactly? There is no evidence cited for this claim. I assure you, no such consensus exists among humanist scholars. Ask Christopher Hitchens:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8VFFW0sbF4
I am new here on Wikipedia. This is my first edit so I don't really know how to proceed forward. Any guidance you can provide would be much appreciated. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naplesmedellin ( talk • contribs) 07:10, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey, Donner 60, the William Weld edit was an attempt to undo a total hack job on his wiki page. You need to erase all changes made in the last 3 hours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.123.169.206 ( talk) 02:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
I'm new to this, so please be gentle.
You asked on my talk page about why I deleted some content without providing an explanation. I did provide an explanation. I chose the option "(Undid revision 720987820 by Blackhammer27 (talk) Reverting vandalism or test edit)" from the edit page.
The change page is URL https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Jonathan%20Tah&diff=720987971 Carlroddam ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This is a courtesy notification as the filer failed to notify you.
EvergreenFir
(talk) Please {{
re}}
03:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a highly active Huggle user (top 20, actually). The Wikimedia Collaboration Team is researching a project that we hope will be useful to people who use Huggle and others engaged in edit-review and anti-vandalism. Using artificial intelligence programming (in ORES) and other means, we believe we can create feeds of Recent Changes that are better tailored to the type of work you do, helping you to be more effective and efficient. (The technology will have other benefits as well, which we can talk about.)
We're in the early stages of planning this and want to speak with people like yourself to better understand your work, goals and issues. If you’re interested in helping, I’d like to set up a time to meet by video conference, so that you can explain and demonstrate (via screensharing) some of your workflows, and we can ask and answer any questions.
To participate, please email the following information to me, jmatazzoniwikimedia.org, or send it to designresearch
wikimedia.org:
Thanks! JMatazzoni (WMF) ( talk) 19:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For your tireless work fending off the vandals and imageboard attacks. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 03:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC) |
This is a message about my deleted edits to the John McDougall page. What I did was (1) delete 2 sentences which were obviously biased and complete duplicates of each other and (2) added a counter-citation to add balance to the previous negative citation. If the goal is unbiased objectivity then what I did was further that. I have nothing to do with the subject other than currently reading some of the McDougall's materials and that is why the original Wikipedia article stood out as blatantly ugly and biased. Isn't a neutral, objective and unbiased post preferable? Doug Lerner ( talk) 03:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)douglerner
I appreciate your taking my intent into consideration. I apologize if I am not entering this correctly as I am not used to this feature. Thank you. Doug Lerner ( talk) 03:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey Donner, This is in regards to the International Islamic propagation centre page which I have updated. We would like to create a new Page for Muhammad Shaikh & it does not allow to do so since his name is already mentioned in International Islamic propagation centre. Kindly help what should I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vansonclose ( talk • contribs) 22:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your time -- no worries 68.13.222.11 ( talk) 01:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
You deleted the following for "vandalism" on Demagogue?
On ITV’s “ Good Morning Britain” on Tuesday, Stephen Hawking referred to Donald Trump as "a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator.” and that he "can't" understand his popularity. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
Hi Donner60, I'm really blown away by this editor world and all that's happening behind the scenes of an article. In my mediocre college education, professors always tried to discredit Wikipedia as a site where "everyone could just make an entry". I am blown away and clicked through layers and layers of edits and I truly stand in awe with what I just discovered here.
Concerning my edit: I apologize if I might have recklessly broken one of the Wiki-policies, but I couldn't help but notice that the article said "unsystemic" instead of "unsystematic".
Best wishes,
68.111.190.72 ( talk) 06:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Trésor
I just like to say that those DVDs are fake, the real ones aren't. And yeah, keep the change that I did a minute ago, OK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.191.252.240 ( talk) 19:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Why did you blank this page. This is a textbook case of nonsense and should have been tagged as {{ db-g1}}. No blanking needed. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 21:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry to have done so without an explanation. I spotted what I believe was an attempt at manipulation (arguably NPOV) on a "climate skeptics" and thus reverted the edit. I'll leave it to you to decide to leave it in or out.
Link to apparent attempt at manipulation: https://www.reddit.com/r/climateskeptics/comments/4lx550/body_of_proof_large_number_of_studies_show/d3s4o4n
I have an archive.is link as well (5GGLT after the slash) in case it gets deleted/edited. 74.56.190.125 ( talk) 21:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
(message deleted)
Hi Donner60, I just saw your message of 03:14, 31 May 2016 about the reverted edit for this page. This was not a test edit after all, just a small one to correct a small mistake in the one of the types of meat that was being cooked in that episode (which I happened to have been watching at the time). [1] Astrosnapper ( talk) 04:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [1] (Season 3 Episode 2 on Google Play (probably not a proper source).
Hello!
You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thanks! 20:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for restoring the content! Silly me! Sorry about that:) Trustworthybastile ( talk) 02:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your anti-vandalism work on Top Model-related articles! :D Linguist 111 talk 04:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thank you for improving wikipedia :) HorseHeadMask ( talk) 01:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC) |
You sent me a message saying that I edited or vandalized a page called KnightOwl; however I made no such edit. This is a private computer. Is it possible someone spoofed my IP address? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.65.9 ( talk) 02:07, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for undoing the changes to my userpage. Jllm06 ( talk) 12:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
You're welcome. Donner60 ( talk) 21:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, regarding that revert you spoke to me about: I did further research and found that I was inaccurate. I will leave your revert as it is and not make any more edits. Thanks! :)
DrForbidden ( talk) 05:29, 14 July 2016 (UTC)DrForbidden
Regarding the deletion of Goodland and Anhang (2009) from the Methane entry --- from page 14 of their article: "Further work is needed to recalibrate methane emissions other than those attributable to livestock products using a 20-year timeframe." Given that the FAO originally used the 100-year GWPs, this indeed means that Goodland and Anhang are using the 20-year GWP for methane from livestock and the 100-year GWP for methane from all other anthropogenic sources.This is obvious if you follow their adjustment. OnceJolly ( talk) 04:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
The "recalibration" is a trivial calculation which suggests that its the authors that have the agenda. In any case, I've left the reference to the article and added a further reference to a more recent study from the FAO. OnceJolly ( talk) 05:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed your comment on that IP's talk page here [1]. Unfortunately, he/she does not seem to take in consideration anything on his talk. He/she started adding (or changing) random unsourced birth/death dates few days ago, then randomly changing nationalities (English/Scottish -> British; England -> United Kingdom) or adding USA after an American state. Khruner ( talk) 13:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
About your edit here [2]: please note that your edit summary describing the edit you reverted as "unexplained" was wrong – the previous edit by Odabade90 [3] clearly had a talkpage link in its edit summary [4], which does point to an explanation of this edit. I'm not saying the edit was objectively good or justified (no opinion either way); I'd just like everybody to be extra careful to engage in constructive discussion before new revert-wars erupt on that article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm User 72.198.49.108. What I wanted to say is that this isn't my opinion but a historical event. I didn't mean any harm, but I only wanted to report the facts so I edited it with a balanced, neutral point of view. If I made a mistake then please leave me a note on my talk page. Thank you. 72.198.49.108 ( talk) 02:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | |
hero of reviewing | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 186 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Thank you. You have made many wonderful contributions to the project. I always have appreciated the recognition from you and am flattered to receive this further notice. Donner60 ( talk) 06:00, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi i accidentally removed some stuff then added it back while adding another row. Can u delete what u added now cuz i cant n i dont wanna mess it up. Thanks👍🏼😬 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.2.124.74 ( talk) 03:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
You keep undoing my changes to West Coast Hip-Hop. The Oakland section says "known locally as Oaktown". "Oaktown is an antiquated term that natives stopped using around 1994. Oakland is referred to by natives as "The Town", because San Francisco is known as "The City". Due to gentrification and the rising influx of transplants relocating to Oakland, many newer residents have resurrected the term "Oaktown" however when one uses this term, it's a dead giveaway that they are in fact neither from Oakland nor grew up in Oakland. In addition you undid my changes to San Francisco. The City is not known locally as "San Fran". In fact, the term "San Fran" is universally hated among nearly all Bay Area natives. "Frisco" is looked down upon too, but rappers like JT the Bigga Figga and RBL Posse have referred to The City as "Frisco" in their songs. In urban cultures, SF is also known as "Sucka Free City", a phrase made popular by rappers Rappin' 4-Tay, San Quinn and JT the Bigga Figga. The slang term is what inspired the title of the 2004 movie Sucker Free City which was written by San Francisco native Alex Tse.
Hi Donner60! I just wanted to let you know that the article was blanked by its creator. I went ahead and reverted your and added the G7 tag. Hope you're doing well, and I hope you have a great rest of your day. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
@ Oshwah: Thanks. I missed that one so I am glad you caught it. And a good day to you as well! Donner60 ( talk) 01:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Sorry if my recent edit appeared to be unconstructive, but I was just trying to keep a bit of consistent terminology on A-League in regards to the word "soccer". Also, this is a shared IP address, so those other edits weren't done by me. 138.44.177.178 ( talk) 01:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
You just sent me a message saying you removed a link I submitted but I have never done such a thing? I have password protected wifi so I don't know what happened...It certainly wasn't anyone in my house, they would never be able to figure out how to use wikipedia... 23.240.189.22 ( talk) 08:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
please take a look on follow web page : http://mymultiplesclerosis.co.uk/eat/saccharin-diet-fat/ which talk about Saccharin v Stevia Comparison , test result show Saccharin can cause high blood glucose levels !!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.149.179.240 ( talk) 02:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Heelo. I am sorry. It seems that you deleted my commentary on the article tomb of Genghis Khan. I am not a specialist of this subject, but my commentary was very simple : as I said, there were no Jesuits in the 15th century. So I reacted to this misinformation. I think that this information should be checked and source verified in order to improve accuracy. Sorry, but I can't do it. Good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.241.210.129 ( talk) 23:00, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |