Hello, DoctorTerrella, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Geophysics. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! RockMagnetist ( talk) 16:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi DoctorTerrella! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC) |
FYI: unsupported claims of real-life competency (etc.) are usually ignored. (Hey, anyone can claim!) If you want credit for such you generally need to reveal who you are. Alternately, there is a method by which WP editors can be vouched for by other editors, based on face-to-face meetings. Ask if you have questions. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 00:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I have a similar conflict like with my edits at herschel at the Tragedy of the commons article and would appreciate your comment there. Seems German scholars are not accepted, even if they get published in English. Herschel would have provided some ironic remarks on that I presume. Serten ( talk) 23:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
In answer to your question in this edit summary, the paragraph in question goes on to give examples of what is meant here by "good":
There is no easy characterization of function spaces for which this holds, though. (Source: I am a mathematical analyst.) Sławomir Biały ( talk) 22:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
You're using the wrong file name ... try this and it should work:
Put double brackets at either end. - Xenxax ( talk) 15:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Don't want to comment further at knowledgekid's talk page, but is it really necessary for you to insert yourself? This hardly seems reason enough. Carolmooredc ( Talkie-Talkie) 17:26, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I saw your earlier comment but I still don't get it now you repeat the thing. I'm not aware of anyone who takes any sort of offence at "Brit", which is just shortform for British. I could understand some people taking offence at being labelled with the latter, of coursem and that would then have a knock-on effect. - Sitush ( talk) 16:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Space weather, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Graham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi DoctorTerrella:
I apologize for the delay in my response. Since you requested assistance with Earthquake Prediction on my Talk Page, I see a few editors have added some citations and done some editing. I'll give the page some attention over the next day or two. Please let me know if there are certain sections that you feel need particular attention.
Regards-thx Josophie ( talk) 03:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, DoctorTerrella, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Geophysics. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! RockMagnetist ( talk) 16:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi DoctorTerrella! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC) |
FYI: unsupported claims of real-life competency (etc.) are usually ignored. (Hey, anyone can claim!) If you want credit for such you generally need to reveal who you are. Alternately, there is a method by which WP editors can be vouched for by other editors, based on face-to-face meetings. Ask if you have questions. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 00:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
I have a similar conflict like with my edits at herschel at the Tragedy of the commons article and would appreciate your comment there. Seems German scholars are not accepted, even if they get published in English. Herschel would have provided some ironic remarks on that I presume. Serten ( talk) 23:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
In answer to your question in this edit summary, the paragraph in question goes on to give examples of what is meant here by "good":
There is no easy characterization of function spaces for which this holds, though. (Source: I am a mathematical analyst.) Sławomir Biały ( talk) 22:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
You're using the wrong file name ... try this and it should work:
Put double brackets at either end. - Xenxax ( talk) 15:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Don't want to comment further at knowledgekid's talk page, but is it really necessary for you to insert yourself? This hardly seems reason enough. Carolmooredc ( Talkie-Talkie) 17:26, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I saw your earlier comment but I still don't get it now you repeat the thing. I'm not aware of anyone who takes any sort of offence at "Brit", which is just shortform for British. I could understand some people taking offence at being labelled with the latter, of coursem and that would then have a knock-on effect. - Sitush ( talk) 16:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Space weather, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Graham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi DoctorTerrella:
I apologize for the delay in my response. Since you requested assistance with Earthquake Prediction on my Talk Page, I see a few editors have added some citations and done some editing. I'll give the page some attention over the next day or two. Please let me know if there are certain sections that you feel need particular attention.
Regards-thx Josophie ( talk) 03:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)