A welcome from P ri ma t e # 101
Happy Wiki-ing!
-- Primat e #101 02:45, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey, welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your edits on Alcibiades and thought I'd point you to a few policies that might help you out in the future. One is our Neutral point of view policy; we always try to write in a neutral, non-judgemental tone that just presents the facts and describes any important opinions about them, letting the reader make his own judgements. Another is the guideline on how to cite sources. It's great that your citing your sources, but they'll be a lot easier for other people to deal with and use if you use one of the formats described on that page.
It looks like you're doing great work, so keep it up! -- Robth Talk 21:51, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
If you check the talk page of Alcibiades, you'll see that it is nominated for GA. A fellow Wikipedian made the nomination, after I listed the article within the scope of teo Wikiprojects (Biography and Military).
Personally, I wouldn't nominate the article. I think there is still a lot of work to be done. And I prefer to go straight for FA than GA, when an article seems ready. Nonetheless, since the nomination is done, I think we should give it a shot. And we'll have to co-operate to pass the article.
The problem is I'll be missing for a week. Hence, it would be nice to keep an eye on the GA candidacy page and watch how it is going. You may even have to work on your own, if I'm not back on time. Anyway ... I felt I had to inform you about all these things.-- Yannismarou 08:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
First of all, are you still with Wikipedia? I don't see you around!
If you still are around here, you may have seen that Alcibiades is a GA. I expected a much more difficult procedure, but the article is obviously already very-well written. Since you did most of the article's editing, you should be very happy.
The user who passed the article, strongly recommends to push it for
Featured Article. Indeed, I intend to go for FA, after I improve some more things (references, a few things left concerning neutrality and content) and after I go for one or more peer-reviews. But, I want to know if I can count you. What I mean:
I had already a success with Pericles and I think that, if we push together this procedure and have a good level of co-operation, we have a chance to succeed in making Alcibiades FA. What do you think?-- Yannismarou 14:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
A welcome from P ri ma t e # 101
Happy Wiki-ing!
-- Primat e #101 02:45, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey, welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your edits on Alcibiades and thought I'd point you to a few policies that might help you out in the future. One is our Neutral point of view policy; we always try to write in a neutral, non-judgemental tone that just presents the facts and describes any important opinions about them, letting the reader make his own judgements. Another is the guideline on how to cite sources. It's great that your citing your sources, but they'll be a lot easier for other people to deal with and use if you use one of the formats described on that page.
It looks like you're doing great work, so keep it up! -- Robth Talk 21:51, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
If you check the talk page of Alcibiades, you'll see that it is nominated for GA. A fellow Wikipedian made the nomination, after I listed the article within the scope of teo Wikiprojects (Biography and Military).
Personally, I wouldn't nominate the article. I think there is still a lot of work to be done. And I prefer to go straight for FA than GA, when an article seems ready. Nonetheless, since the nomination is done, I think we should give it a shot. And we'll have to co-operate to pass the article.
The problem is I'll be missing for a week. Hence, it would be nice to keep an eye on the GA candidacy page and watch how it is going. You may even have to work on your own, if I'm not back on time. Anyway ... I felt I had to inform you about all these things.-- Yannismarou 08:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
First of all, are you still with Wikipedia? I don't see you around!
If you still are around here, you may have seen that Alcibiades is a GA. I expected a much more difficult procedure, but the article is obviously already very-well written. Since you did most of the article's editing, you should be very happy.
The user who passed the article, strongly recommends to push it for
Featured Article. Indeed, I intend to go for FA, after I improve some more things (references, a few things left concerning neutrality and content) and after I go for one or more peer-reviews. But, I want to know if I can count you. What I mean:
I had already a success with Pericles and I think that, if we push together this procedure and have a good level of co-operation, we have a chance to succeed in making Alcibiades FA. What do you think?-- Yannismarou 14:41, 4 September 2006 (UTC)