Sign (~~~~) before you save.
Home
Talk
Contributions
Archives
Make yourself at home....
| ||||||||||||
Heads up and my personal apologyHello DIREKTOR et al. I'm writing here because I know the group of you will get this message. While I cannot support ultra nationalists of any stripe or colour, I write to you to convey my disapproval of the so-called "Italian" side of this coin, especially since I notice my name has been included to suggest I sympathise- I DO NOT! In fact, I have "retired" my account because I'm tired of WP's inability to deal with POV pushers on lower profile articles [that includes your lot, by the way]. Anyways... I cannot help the occasional snooping and, this time, I could not resist intervention. I am certain User:Pannonicus, User:Marygiove and numerous anon IP numbers (for example [1] [2] [3] and many others, always from Colorado, USA) are puppets of User:Brunodam. He is on this mission of promoting Italian irredentism, including use of Template:Italian Ethnic Groups for this purpose. I am not sure if there is a direct connection with GG and his alter egos, but of Brunodam I am positive (In fact, there is one slipped contribution where he signs as "Mary", but is logged on as Brunodam!). While I will likely continue to snoop from time to time, in future I will not intervene. Ciao, Mariokempes ( talk) 18:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi.I totally agree with what you say that there seems to be somewhat of an anti-slavic stance in wikipedia, and the western world, in general. We have to persist in out efforts to balance articles, and let the truth be told. Slavs aren't just a bunch of primitive, war-mongerers (although recently, we don;t have much to be proud of). The whol italian thing you have been having trouble with, as the same i;m experienceing 'on the other side'- with Greeks about Macedonia et al. By the way, what was watson's racial theory about DNA ? Hxseek ( talk) 23:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Independent State of CroatiaYour most recent edits don't read very well. For instance did you mean to say that the NDH regained de jure responsibility for areas that had been annexed by Hungary? Elsewhere too the English is rather clumsy and potentially ambiguous. I could try to sort it out, but as English is your native language you mightprefer to do it yourself? Regards Kirker ( talk) 23:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I suppose you will notice that someone removed "puppet state" from the intro. The new version may be technically accurate, but without saying enough about NDH's subservient status. On the other hand "puppet state" will always be contentious as it is so blatantly derogatory. You said somewhere that Germany dictated the composition of Pavelic's cabinet etc, and if you have a source for that I would like to see it in the article. With that kind of detail added, the terminology would not be too important, since anyone could then see the NDH for what it was. Kirker ( talk) 17:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC) SPA accountsI do not see points in discussion with nationalistic SPA accounts. User:Mike Babic is created with only intention to write about good Serbs and bad Croats. Similar to that is User:AP1929 which is writing about Ante Pavelic which has not made anything wrong. They both are nothing else but new versions of SPA accounts user:Votec, user:Justiceinwiki , User:Brkic .... Ulmost every month we are having new nationalistic SPA accounts which are knowing real truth. In my personal thinking User:Mike Babic is puppet of User:Procrustes the clown which has rewrited Serbian version of Yugoslav wars but even if this is true it is not possible to block him because he has not broken any rules (OK he has vandalized my user page). After my blocking of 3 users in second half of February I have expected little peace but ....-- Rjecina ( talk) 03:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Mike Babic story has ended :)) He has used sock (IP address) for reverting articles. I will start action for his blocking today...-- Rjecina ( talk) 22:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
WP:AE reportA report was filed on you at the arbitration enforcement board yesterday, by someone who might be an inexperienced editor. I just noticed that you hadn't been told. GRBerry 14:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of VK Gusar![]() If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding Messaggi di servizioCiao. Per favore, non scrivere voci notoriamente non enciclopediche e, di conseguenza, non cancellare i messaggi dalle tue discussioni. Grazie, MOJSKA 666 ( msg) 11:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
VK GrusarThe article needs some major work put in. Firstly, citations and references for the most successful club bit. Perhaps adding an info box with important information like dates and such would help expand the article. Maybe look at other "team" sport type pages for some ideas. Otherwise, I fear that the article will be up for speedy, prod, or other form of deletion. If you are still working on the article User:DIREKTOR maybe put an "underconstruction" tag on it while you are expanding it. Just attempting to be helpful, hope it comes across that way. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 12:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC) I think that we need this sort of article. Can you please help in editing ?-- Rjecina ( talk) 19:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Of course. not today, though, going to bed early. see you tomorrow. -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 20:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)The
March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
BedWhat are you still doing up, asshole? Don't you have a bed to go to? I'm going to call your mother to complain. :-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 00:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Galactica? Easily the best SF series ever. By a distance. I too am thoroughly addicted... Regarding your cmts at Bleiburg today, I wholeheartedly agree. I saw the sentence regarding some TV phone in and couldn't quite believe my eyes. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Moving articlesI can't claim not to have made the same mistake... Well, that's 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th. The 4th and 5th had names, so that's all then?
Official cautionThese comments by you were not helpful. [7] [8] You are still personalizing your edits too much, saying that someone must "have some agenda", or sarcastically referring to anyone, even yourself, as "anti-Italians". Let me be clear, you must stop the personal comments about other editors. I do not want to have to issue sanctions against a longterm editor, but this is a volatile situation that I do not want to see further escalate. So please stick to discussing the article, not the other editors. -- El on ka 07:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
VoteSorry, DIREKTOR. I support the renaming, but I oppose to proposed new name. Kubura ( talk) 14:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Bed 2??? :-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Get some sleep. Tmrw's g'na be a busy day. The Rab article gets unblocked. Me? I'm homeless. Sleeping on the streets. That's how come I'm still awake. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Yep, that photo is one that all our Italian co-editors should have in the forefront of their minds. That's why I used it here [9]. Mate, looking forward to meeting you in person for a few beers sometime. ;-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Diacritics-arbitrationHi I intend to send this argument about spelling the south Slavic names (Franjo Tuđman ,Novak Đoković etc. ) here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration It seemss it's the only solution! -- Anto ( talk) 21:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Aimoe di Savoia-Aoste, Principe di SavoiaDone. :-) Re: Rab, seems the problem's over, for now at least. If there's any benefit to a situation like that guy Gennarous turning up, the article's much better now than it was a month ago. So that's cool. See ya :-) -- AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 20:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC) I have not abused the policy you quotedNamely WP:Canvassing allows informing the users who were involved in the article or the discussion. I have not strained from that. Only authors who would contribute to the discussion have been invited to join. -- Imbris ( talk) 01:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC) The user I informed has been participating in the discussion before and also opposed. Your actions to smirge my communications are void. -- Imbris ( talk) 01:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Who implied such statements. Please stop clouding the discussion with your emotions. Also If you wanted a real discussion why haven't you notified all the participants of the recend rename crusade. Some of current participants have been on wiki for a meere month or so. Is this the discussion you want to create. -- Imbris ( talk) 01:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC) King?I'll stay aside for the moment. My knowledge about this guy is poor, almost none. All that I know is that there was some gazer who was supposed to get title, which never really happened. I'll see if I can dig out some relevant data. Zenanarh ( talk) 17:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
HajdukI wrote that about hajduk many years ago...my English is poor. Ok to leave it but please fix wording or delete OK I want to delete if possible —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.185.84.181 ( talk) 04:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC) I have lost patience with discussion on talk page. Discussion has started because of SPA account which has wanted that Veritas become source for article and now we are having discussion which source are good for this article. On talk page I have declared that today is last day of my discussions and that somebody will take my place. I am asking you and 1 another editor.-- Rjecina ( talk) 12:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Closing the KingNo mate. Let it run. Someone'll be along to shut it down quickly enough. Unfortunately, with a proposed move like this and similar stuff around Wikipedia you only need one or two with loud voices and there's not much chance of getting anything changed. It's easy to block, very difficult to do anything positive. But at least you tried. :-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 18:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Serbs/CraotaiaI do agree that Tudjiman had to comply with restrictions from the US. The outcome at the end proved to be an Croatia that was clearned from the Serbs. Mike Babic ( talk) 21:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I think I'll sit that one out. One battlefield is enough for this weary editor. I think I'll go relax by editing something less controversial and contentious like evolution, September 11, or abortion. :P Ani Mate 01:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Deleting articleI have tried to delete user:Velebit article but it is going really bad. Look Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethnic cleansing in Croatia. I know that it is not OK to call you or any other user to this discussion but I need somebody with better english and it is very good if it is from Dalmatia because of bullshits in that article-- Rjecina ( talk) 07:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)The
April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Re:TomislavI have responded to your comment on my talk page. Once again, my apologies - late night editing after a long day. Take care, JPG-GR ( talk) 07:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
DecisionA decision was made the RM was closed, just because you don't like the outcome you shouldn't hassle the person who closed it. Moving the article will go against published sources and WP:NC the arguments for a move are based on peoples own unsupported opinions that is clear. You should accept the decision unless you can provide sources to saying he is a "pretender" or that he was never king of Croatia. - dwc lr ( talk) 11:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC) No doubt you will point out "mistake's" to everyone until you get it moved your actions are disgraceful. He made a decision, the support votes are all peoples own pov where are the sources to support your argument? Why would someone move the article to an incorrect title according WP:NC Prince Aimone, Duke of Aosta would be the correct title if he was a "pretender" which we know he wasn't. - dwc lr ( talk) 14:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Ok fair enough I'll look at the talk page. Where can I find the sources that dispute he was King of Croatia and say he was a pretender. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC) I'm prepared to be convinced that is why I've been asking for sources that call him a Pretender etc. If the reasons for the support votes were added into the article they would be removed as unverifiable as their are no sources. At present I don't see why the article should be moved when there are no published sources (which is what wikipedia uses) to support that he is a pretender etc. goodbye. - dwc lr ( talk) 17:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC) IP 151.67...Buddy, Had a bit of a break for a week or two. Holiday then work. How are you? The 151.67 IP you've dealt with today is PIO. Best, AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 15:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Il signor IP 151.67... sono io: mi chiamo Luigi e scrivo dall'Italia. Chiedo scusa se scrivo in italiano e non in inglese, ma trovo più semplice così, visto che comunque tu parli anche la mia lingua. Ovviamente potrai rispondermi in inglese. Riguardo alla voce " Italian cultural and historic presence in Dalmatia" chi ha citato il Giustiniani ha scritto un FALSO. Ecco cosa scrive Francesco Bruni nella sua "Storia della lingua italiana", al capitolo che si riferisce al Veneziano coloniale: <<Giovambattista Giustiniani (...) per conto della Repubblica di Venezia visitò nel 1553 le basi dell’Adriatico orientale. Attento anche alla lingua, egli osserva che si parla la "lingua franca" a Pirano, Zara, Sebenico, Lesina; per Traù e Spalato aggiunge che gli uomini parlano la lingua franca, mentre le donne conoscono solo lo slavo (Traù: "hanno ben tutti la lingua franca, ma nelle case loro parlano schiavo [slavo] per rispetto alle donne, perché pocche d’esse intendono la lingua italiana, et se bene qualcuna intende, non vuol intendere se non la lingua materna"; Spalato: "tutti li cittadini parlano lingua franca [...] ma le donne non favellano se non la lor lingua materna"; per Ragusa, poi, il Giustiniani afferma che "parlano tutti lingua dalmatica e franca"; a Veglia l’idioma locale sembra all’orecchio del Giustiniani una sorta di gergo ("calmone"), mentre "tutti... forestamente favellano italiano francamente" (traggo queste testimonianze da Vianello 1955). Dunque si ricavano le opposizioni lingua franca / schiavo (Traù e, implicitamente, Spalato); lingua franca / dalmatico (Ragusa); idioma locale / italiano a Veglia; e dalla testimonianza riguardante Ragusa sembra che la denominazione di "lingua franca" equivalga a "lingua italiana". Si tratta della stessa "lingua franca" con la quale i cristiani comunicavano, nei porti mediterranei, con Arabi e Turchi (si veda il par. 5)? Una risposta negativa è più che probabile, come dimostra la convertibilità di "lingua franca" e "lingua italiana"; anche perché una lingua di comunicazione quotidiana per la navigazione e gli affari mercantili tra popolazioni venete da un lato, dalmatiche (o croatizzate) dall’altro sarà stata diversa. Certo, c’è da dubitare del carattere "italiano" di questa "lingua franca"; probabilmente, per "italiano" si deve intendere un italiano fortemente locale, di colore veneziano, che gli uomini di Zara o Traù parlavano con i forestieri con cui avevano contatti più fitti, e dunque con i veneziani o veneti provenienti dalla sponda opposta dell’Adriatico.>> Ho notato, caro Direktor, che tu consideri tutta una serie di voci di Wikipedia come "cosa tua", per cui non mi permetto più di modificarle. Certo è che se hai un minimo di metodo storiografico, non puoi permettere che venga mantenuta la falsa citazione nella voce di cui tu sei un buon "guardiano". Vedremo. Luigi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.70.75.185 ( talk) 19:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC) OOps! non ero il il 151.67, ma il 151.70... comunque il mio messaggio rimane valido. Luigi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.70.75.185 ( talk) 19:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
My name is really Luigi in the real world, ma non so nemmeno chi sia questo PIO. Sono interessato alla storia della Dalmazia e cercavo un testo. Siccome conosco il Giustiniani, mi pareva strano che qualcuno lo citasse in modo FALSO. Comunque sia, se mi dai un indirizzo e-mail ti spedisco il mio indirizzo completo, così puoi fare una prova. Luigi 151.70.75.185 ( talk) 19:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Ragazzi, siete veramente al di là di ogni immaginazione: caro Direktor, che ti costa fare la prova per capire se io sono Luigi o questo benedetto PIO che non so chi cavolo sia? Ho scritto poche cose su argomenti che conosco per averli studiati per anni (Istria e Dalmazia): ogni volta ho inserito una bibliografia (il Perselli o il Bruni o altri), e qualche furbo dice che io sono un altro e mi cancella tutto quanto senza nemmeno andare a vedere se quello che ho scritto è supportato o no? Volete per lo meno dare un'occhiata ai libri che ho citato o ve ne fregate assolutamente? Ripeto: se mi fai avere un indirizzo di posta elettronica, ti invio i miei numeri di telefono, oppure puoi contattarmi al seguente indirizzo e-mail: pf1888@tiscali.it. Che fatica!!! Luigi 151.70.75.185 ( talk) 20:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Caro PIO, Italian cultural and historic presence in Dalmatia has been added to lists of articles protected against you. See [11]. Ciao ciao, AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 21:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC) You are working with our italian friends so this is for you: "In article is writen that Coloman has visited in 1108 Trau, Zára and Spalato.". I want to write Trogir, Zadar and Split but I am afraid that I will start edit war.-- Rjecina ( talk) 18:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Re: People's Liberation Army (Yugoslavia)If the merge is complete, then redirect the duplicate page to Yugoslav partisans. That is the last step in a content merge. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Welcome backHi mate, Bruno's SSP reoprt is still open at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Brunodam. Obviously everyone's too busy to do anything about it... Other than that, it's been pretty quiet. Just the usual stuff, really :-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 14:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Please avoidPlease avoid starting new articles on wikipedia based solely on my website Vojska.net, it benefits nobody, Wikipedia gets article which won't be updated anytime soon and I get pushed from number one spot at Google since wikipedia is using nofollow tags ( example) and even worse Google declares me copy of wikipedia if text is too similar and remove my website completely from search results! Thank you. P.S. Current articles which are simple copy of my own with fixed English grammar might even be considered copyright violation. -- Ivan Bajlo ( talk) 21:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Belgrade Offensive editsJust want you to know that I will be reverting any of your edits that are not properly referenced or can be substantiated from third sources.-- mrg3105 ( comms) ♠♥♦♣ 23:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Srbosjek deletionArgument for deletion are:
In July 2007 nationalistic SPA account Joka has recreated article Srbosjek. All internet sources writen by him has been declared POV or false (example: his source has been Jasenovac museum but link is given to archive of Republika Srpska and not to Jasenovac museum web page) only "surviving" sources of article are "obscure" books which is not possible to check. But Wikipedia can't trust editor which is writing false, POV sources and which is support nationalistic positions which will be latter defeated by RFC with vote 6:0 (last edit of Joka has been statement that Jasenovac is Holocaust Extermination camp) Only sources used in attempt to defeat claim of WP:V problems has been Bulajić and Jasenovac committee of the Holly Assembly of Bishop of the Serbian Ortodox Church. Bulajić is interesting persons which is screaming that Serb forces has not commited genocide in Srebrenica (which is confirmed by International Court of Justice) [13] but that Croatian forces has commited genocide against Serbs during WWII which is not confirmed by international organizations or historians) Name of second source:"Jasenovac committee of the Holly Assembly of Bishop of the Serbian Ortodox Church" is telling all about this POV site but it is time to speak about this site claims: On this page Jasenovac info site is claiming that 300,000 Yugoslavs are victims of Ustashe, on second page they are claiming 360,000 Serbs victims of Gradina which is only 1 part of Jasenovac extermination camp and on third page they are claiming that from April, 1941, to the middle of August, 1942, over 600,000 Serbs were killed. Because of that this site is not having standards to be wikipedia reliable source. During last deletion discussion SPA account Hvarako has used like argument google search but this has been defeat in argument because "A Google search which excludes Wikipedia and its mirrors shows only a few uses of the term "Srbosjek" and those appear to be in blogs or other sites which do not satisfy WP:RS and WP:V" DIREKTOR what you think about reasons for deletion ? If you start discussion you must ask administrator to look for WP:CANVASS and voting without writing reasons for vote -- Rjecina ( talk) 08:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I can't believe how many of these guys appear all the time. Anyway, I'm now starting a general cleanup of the Chetniks article. I think its high time someone purged it up of all the nationalist glorification. -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 18:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
MoreUnbelievable. A guy is nazi by declaration, it seems. Such jerks still exist? Zenanarh ( talk) 13:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Totally DisputedAre you going to raise the factually inaccurate information and pov issues on talk page then so people can discuss them? - dwc lr ( talk) 15:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC) What are your issues for adding the tag what is inaccurate and pov. You put it their you haven't posted on the talk page highlighting them. Oh and "The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section." - dwc lr ( talk) 15:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Well what are going to do about it. WP:RM. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC) If you don't like the article title you know what to do. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Is PaxEquilibrium disputing the title? I thought he was asking Imbris if he "approves of the Axis aggression" and "supports the Ustashi" which seems most irrelevant to Tomislav II. - dwc lr ( talk) Also is this the template you want, Template:Disputed title. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Come in handy for me as well. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC) |
Sign (~~~~) before you save.
Home
Talk
Contributions
Archives
Make yourself at home....
| ||||||||||||
Heads up and my personal apologyHello DIREKTOR et al. I'm writing here because I know the group of you will get this message. While I cannot support ultra nationalists of any stripe or colour, I write to you to convey my disapproval of the so-called "Italian" side of this coin, especially since I notice my name has been included to suggest I sympathise- I DO NOT! In fact, I have "retired" my account because I'm tired of WP's inability to deal with POV pushers on lower profile articles [that includes your lot, by the way]. Anyways... I cannot help the occasional snooping and, this time, I could not resist intervention. I am certain User:Pannonicus, User:Marygiove and numerous anon IP numbers (for example [1] [2] [3] and many others, always from Colorado, USA) are puppets of User:Brunodam. He is on this mission of promoting Italian irredentism, including use of Template:Italian Ethnic Groups for this purpose. I am not sure if there is a direct connection with GG and his alter egos, but of Brunodam I am positive (In fact, there is one slipped contribution where he signs as "Mary", but is logged on as Brunodam!). While I will likely continue to snoop from time to time, in future I will not intervene. Ciao, Mariokempes ( talk) 18:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi.I totally agree with what you say that there seems to be somewhat of an anti-slavic stance in wikipedia, and the western world, in general. We have to persist in out efforts to balance articles, and let the truth be told. Slavs aren't just a bunch of primitive, war-mongerers (although recently, we don;t have much to be proud of). The whol italian thing you have been having trouble with, as the same i;m experienceing 'on the other side'- with Greeks about Macedonia et al. By the way, what was watson's racial theory about DNA ? Hxseek ( talk) 23:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Independent State of CroatiaYour most recent edits don't read very well. For instance did you mean to say that the NDH regained de jure responsibility for areas that had been annexed by Hungary? Elsewhere too the English is rather clumsy and potentially ambiguous. I could try to sort it out, but as English is your native language you mightprefer to do it yourself? Regards Kirker ( talk) 23:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I suppose you will notice that someone removed "puppet state" from the intro. The new version may be technically accurate, but without saying enough about NDH's subservient status. On the other hand "puppet state" will always be contentious as it is so blatantly derogatory. You said somewhere that Germany dictated the composition of Pavelic's cabinet etc, and if you have a source for that I would like to see it in the article. With that kind of detail added, the terminology would not be too important, since anyone could then see the NDH for what it was. Kirker ( talk) 17:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC) SPA accountsI do not see points in discussion with nationalistic SPA accounts. User:Mike Babic is created with only intention to write about good Serbs and bad Croats. Similar to that is User:AP1929 which is writing about Ante Pavelic which has not made anything wrong. They both are nothing else but new versions of SPA accounts user:Votec, user:Justiceinwiki , User:Brkic .... Ulmost every month we are having new nationalistic SPA accounts which are knowing real truth. In my personal thinking User:Mike Babic is puppet of User:Procrustes the clown which has rewrited Serbian version of Yugoslav wars but even if this is true it is not possible to block him because he has not broken any rules (OK he has vandalized my user page). After my blocking of 3 users in second half of February I have expected little peace but ....-- Rjecina ( talk) 03:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Mike Babic story has ended :)) He has used sock (IP address) for reverting articles. I will start action for his blocking today...-- Rjecina ( talk) 22:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
WP:AE reportA report was filed on you at the arbitration enforcement board yesterday, by someone who might be an inexperienced editor. I just noticed that you hadn't been told. GRBerry 14:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of VK Gusar![]() If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding Messaggi di servizioCiao. Per favore, non scrivere voci notoriamente non enciclopediche e, di conseguenza, non cancellare i messaggi dalle tue discussioni. Grazie, MOJSKA 666 ( msg) 11:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
VK GrusarThe article needs some major work put in. Firstly, citations and references for the most successful club bit. Perhaps adding an info box with important information like dates and such would help expand the article. Maybe look at other "team" sport type pages for some ideas. Otherwise, I fear that the article will be up for speedy, prod, or other form of deletion. If you are still working on the article User:DIREKTOR maybe put an "underconstruction" tag on it while you are expanding it. Just attempting to be helpful, hope it comes across that way. Jasynnash2 ( talk) 12:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC) I think that we need this sort of article. Can you please help in editing ?-- Rjecina ( talk) 19:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Of course. not today, though, going to bed early. see you tomorrow. -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 20:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC) The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)The
March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
BedWhat are you still doing up, asshole? Don't you have a bed to go to? I'm going to call your mother to complain. :-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 00:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Galactica? Easily the best SF series ever. By a distance. I too am thoroughly addicted... Regarding your cmts at Bleiburg today, I wholeheartedly agree. I saw the sentence regarding some TV phone in and couldn't quite believe my eyes. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Moving articlesI can't claim not to have made the same mistake... Well, that's 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th. The 4th and 5th had names, so that's all then?
Official cautionThese comments by you were not helpful. [7] [8] You are still personalizing your edits too much, saying that someone must "have some agenda", or sarcastically referring to anyone, even yourself, as "anti-Italians". Let me be clear, you must stop the personal comments about other editors. I do not want to have to issue sanctions against a longterm editor, but this is a volatile situation that I do not want to see further escalate. So please stick to discussing the article, not the other editors. -- El on ka 07:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
VoteSorry, DIREKTOR. I support the renaming, but I oppose to proposed new name. Kubura ( talk) 14:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Bed 2??? :-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Get some sleep. Tmrw's g'na be a busy day. The Rab article gets unblocked. Me? I'm homeless. Sleeping on the streets. That's how come I'm still awake. AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Yep, that photo is one that all our Italian co-editors should have in the forefront of their minds. That's why I used it here [9]. Mate, looking forward to meeting you in person for a few beers sometime. ;-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 22:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Diacritics-arbitrationHi I intend to send this argument about spelling the south Slavic names (Franjo Tuđman ,Novak Đoković etc. ) here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration It seemss it's the only solution! -- Anto ( talk) 21:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC) Aimoe di Savoia-Aoste, Principe di SavoiaDone. :-) Re: Rab, seems the problem's over, for now at least. If there's any benefit to a situation like that guy Gennarous turning up, the article's much better now than it was a month ago. So that's cool. See ya :-) -- AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 20:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC) I have not abused the policy you quotedNamely WP:Canvassing allows informing the users who were involved in the article or the discussion. I have not strained from that. Only authors who would contribute to the discussion have been invited to join. -- Imbris ( talk) 01:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC) The user I informed has been participating in the discussion before and also opposed. Your actions to smirge my communications are void. -- Imbris ( talk) 01:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Who implied such statements. Please stop clouding the discussion with your emotions. Also If you wanted a real discussion why haven't you notified all the participants of the recend rename crusade. Some of current participants have been on wiki for a meere month or so. Is this the discussion you want to create. -- Imbris ( talk) 01:49, 21 April 2008 (UTC) King?I'll stay aside for the moment. My knowledge about this guy is poor, almost none. All that I know is that there was some gazer who was supposed to get title, which never really happened. I'll see if I can dig out some relevant data. Zenanarh ( talk) 17:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
HajdukI wrote that about hajduk many years ago...my English is poor. Ok to leave it but please fix wording or delete OK I want to delete if possible —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.185.84.181 ( talk) 04:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC) I have lost patience with discussion on talk page. Discussion has started because of SPA account which has wanted that Veritas become source for article and now we are having discussion which source are good for this article. On talk page I have declared that today is last day of my discussions and that somebody will take my place. I am asking you and 1 another editor.-- Rjecina ( talk) 12:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Closing the KingNo mate. Let it run. Someone'll be along to shut it down quickly enough. Unfortunately, with a proposed move like this and similar stuff around Wikipedia you only need one or two with loud voices and there's not much chance of getting anything changed. It's easy to block, very difficult to do anything positive. But at least you tried. :-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 18:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC) Serbs/CraotaiaI do agree that Tudjiman had to comply with restrictions from the US. The outcome at the end proved to be an Croatia that was clearned from the Serbs. Mike Babic ( talk) 21:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I think I'll sit that one out. One battlefield is enough for this weary editor. I think I'll go relax by editing something less controversial and contentious like evolution, September 11, or abortion. :P Ani Mate 01:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Deleting articleI have tried to delete user:Velebit article but it is going really bad. Look Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethnic cleansing in Croatia. I know that it is not OK to call you or any other user to this discussion but I need somebody with better english and it is very good if it is from Dalmatia because of bullshits in that article-- Rjecina ( talk) 07:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)The
April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Re:TomislavI have responded to your comment on my talk page. Once again, my apologies - late night editing after a long day. Take care, JPG-GR ( talk) 07:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
DecisionA decision was made the RM was closed, just because you don't like the outcome you shouldn't hassle the person who closed it. Moving the article will go against published sources and WP:NC the arguments for a move are based on peoples own unsupported opinions that is clear. You should accept the decision unless you can provide sources to saying he is a "pretender" or that he was never king of Croatia. - dwc lr ( talk) 11:49, 7 May 2008 (UTC) No doubt you will point out "mistake's" to everyone until you get it moved your actions are disgraceful. He made a decision, the support votes are all peoples own pov where are the sources to support your argument? Why would someone move the article to an incorrect title according WP:NC Prince Aimone, Duke of Aosta would be the correct title if he was a "pretender" which we know he wasn't. - dwc lr ( talk) 14:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Ok fair enough I'll look at the talk page. Where can I find the sources that dispute he was King of Croatia and say he was a pretender. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC) I'm prepared to be convinced that is why I've been asking for sources that call him a Pretender etc. If the reasons for the support votes were added into the article they would be removed as unverifiable as their are no sources. At present I don't see why the article should be moved when there are no published sources (which is what wikipedia uses) to support that he is a pretender etc. goodbye. - dwc lr ( talk) 17:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC) IP 151.67...Buddy, Had a bit of a break for a week or two. Holiday then work. How are you? The 151.67 IP you've dealt with today is PIO. Best, AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 15:55, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Il signor IP 151.67... sono io: mi chiamo Luigi e scrivo dall'Italia. Chiedo scusa se scrivo in italiano e non in inglese, ma trovo più semplice così, visto che comunque tu parli anche la mia lingua. Ovviamente potrai rispondermi in inglese. Riguardo alla voce " Italian cultural and historic presence in Dalmatia" chi ha citato il Giustiniani ha scritto un FALSO. Ecco cosa scrive Francesco Bruni nella sua "Storia della lingua italiana", al capitolo che si riferisce al Veneziano coloniale: <<Giovambattista Giustiniani (...) per conto della Repubblica di Venezia visitò nel 1553 le basi dell’Adriatico orientale. Attento anche alla lingua, egli osserva che si parla la "lingua franca" a Pirano, Zara, Sebenico, Lesina; per Traù e Spalato aggiunge che gli uomini parlano la lingua franca, mentre le donne conoscono solo lo slavo (Traù: "hanno ben tutti la lingua franca, ma nelle case loro parlano schiavo [slavo] per rispetto alle donne, perché pocche d’esse intendono la lingua italiana, et se bene qualcuna intende, non vuol intendere se non la lingua materna"; Spalato: "tutti li cittadini parlano lingua franca [...] ma le donne non favellano se non la lor lingua materna"; per Ragusa, poi, il Giustiniani afferma che "parlano tutti lingua dalmatica e franca"; a Veglia l’idioma locale sembra all’orecchio del Giustiniani una sorta di gergo ("calmone"), mentre "tutti... forestamente favellano italiano francamente" (traggo queste testimonianze da Vianello 1955). Dunque si ricavano le opposizioni lingua franca / schiavo (Traù e, implicitamente, Spalato); lingua franca / dalmatico (Ragusa); idioma locale / italiano a Veglia; e dalla testimonianza riguardante Ragusa sembra che la denominazione di "lingua franca" equivalga a "lingua italiana". Si tratta della stessa "lingua franca" con la quale i cristiani comunicavano, nei porti mediterranei, con Arabi e Turchi (si veda il par. 5)? Una risposta negativa è più che probabile, come dimostra la convertibilità di "lingua franca" e "lingua italiana"; anche perché una lingua di comunicazione quotidiana per la navigazione e gli affari mercantili tra popolazioni venete da un lato, dalmatiche (o croatizzate) dall’altro sarà stata diversa. Certo, c’è da dubitare del carattere "italiano" di questa "lingua franca"; probabilmente, per "italiano" si deve intendere un italiano fortemente locale, di colore veneziano, che gli uomini di Zara o Traù parlavano con i forestieri con cui avevano contatti più fitti, e dunque con i veneziani o veneti provenienti dalla sponda opposta dell’Adriatico.>> Ho notato, caro Direktor, che tu consideri tutta una serie di voci di Wikipedia come "cosa tua", per cui non mi permetto più di modificarle. Certo è che se hai un minimo di metodo storiografico, non puoi permettere che venga mantenuta la falsa citazione nella voce di cui tu sei un buon "guardiano". Vedremo. Luigi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.70.75.185 ( talk) 19:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC) OOps! non ero il il 151.67, ma il 151.70... comunque il mio messaggio rimane valido. Luigi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.70.75.185 ( talk) 19:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
My name is really Luigi in the real world, ma non so nemmeno chi sia questo PIO. Sono interessato alla storia della Dalmazia e cercavo un testo. Siccome conosco il Giustiniani, mi pareva strano che qualcuno lo citasse in modo FALSO. Comunque sia, se mi dai un indirizzo e-mail ti spedisco il mio indirizzo completo, così puoi fare una prova. Luigi 151.70.75.185 ( talk) 19:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Ragazzi, siete veramente al di là di ogni immaginazione: caro Direktor, che ti costa fare la prova per capire se io sono Luigi o questo benedetto PIO che non so chi cavolo sia? Ho scritto poche cose su argomenti che conosco per averli studiati per anni (Istria e Dalmazia): ogni volta ho inserito una bibliografia (il Perselli o il Bruni o altri), e qualche furbo dice che io sono un altro e mi cancella tutto quanto senza nemmeno andare a vedere se quello che ho scritto è supportato o no? Volete per lo meno dare un'occhiata ai libri che ho citato o ve ne fregate assolutamente? Ripeto: se mi fai avere un indirizzo di posta elettronica, ti invio i miei numeri di telefono, oppure puoi contattarmi al seguente indirizzo e-mail: pf1888@tiscali.it. Che fatica!!! Luigi 151.70.75.185 ( talk) 20:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Caro PIO, Italian cultural and historic presence in Dalmatia has been added to lists of articles protected against you. See [11]. Ciao ciao, AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 21:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC) You are working with our italian friends so this is for you: "In article is writen that Coloman has visited in 1108 Trau, Zára and Spalato.". I want to write Trogir, Zadar and Split but I am afraid that I will start edit war.-- Rjecina ( talk) 18:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Re: People's Liberation Army (Yugoslavia)If the merge is complete, then redirect the duplicate page to Yugoslav partisans. That is the last step in a content merge. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:22, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Welcome backHi mate, Bruno's SSP reoprt is still open at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Brunodam. Obviously everyone's too busy to do anything about it... Other than that, it's been pretty quiet. Just the usual stuff, really :-) AlasdairGreen27 ( talk) 14:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC) Please avoidPlease avoid starting new articles on wikipedia based solely on my website Vojska.net, it benefits nobody, Wikipedia gets article which won't be updated anytime soon and I get pushed from number one spot at Google since wikipedia is using nofollow tags ( example) and even worse Google declares me copy of wikipedia if text is too similar and remove my website completely from search results! Thank you. P.S. Current articles which are simple copy of my own with fixed English grammar might even be considered copyright violation. -- Ivan Bajlo ( talk) 21:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Belgrade Offensive editsJust want you to know that I will be reverting any of your edits that are not properly referenced or can be substantiated from third sources.-- mrg3105 ( comms) ♠♥♦♣ 23:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC) Srbosjek deletionArgument for deletion are:
In July 2007 nationalistic SPA account Joka has recreated article Srbosjek. All internet sources writen by him has been declared POV or false (example: his source has been Jasenovac museum but link is given to archive of Republika Srpska and not to Jasenovac museum web page) only "surviving" sources of article are "obscure" books which is not possible to check. But Wikipedia can't trust editor which is writing false, POV sources and which is support nationalistic positions which will be latter defeated by RFC with vote 6:0 (last edit of Joka has been statement that Jasenovac is Holocaust Extermination camp) Only sources used in attempt to defeat claim of WP:V problems has been Bulajić and Jasenovac committee of the Holly Assembly of Bishop of the Serbian Ortodox Church. Bulajić is interesting persons which is screaming that Serb forces has not commited genocide in Srebrenica (which is confirmed by International Court of Justice) [13] but that Croatian forces has commited genocide against Serbs during WWII which is not confirmed by international organizations or historians) Name of second source:"Jasenovac committee of the Holly Assembly of Bishop of the Serbian Ortodox Church" is telling all about this POV site but it is time to speak about this site claims: On this page Jasenovac info site is claiming that 300,000 Yugoslavs are victims of Ustashe, on second page they are claiming 360,000 Serbs victims of Gradina which is only 1 part of Jasenovac extermination camp and on third page they are claiming that from April, 1941, to the middle of August, 1942, over 600,000 Serbs were killed. Because of that this site is not having standards to be wikipedia reliable source. During last deletion discussion SPA account Hvarako has used like argument google search but this has been defeat in argument because "A Google search which excludes Wikipedia and its mirrors shows only a few uses of the term "Srbosjek" and those appear to be in blogs or other sites which do not satisfy WP:RS and WP:V" DIREKTOR what you think about reasons for deletion ? If you start discussion you must ask administrator to look for WP:CANVASS and voting without writing reasons for vote -- Rjecina ( talk) 08:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I can't believe how many of these guys appear all the time. Anyway, I'm now starting a general cleanup of the Chetniks article. I think its high time someone purged it up of all the nationalist glorification. -- DIREKTOR ( TALK) 18:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
MoreUnbelievable. A guy is nazi by declaration, it seems. Such jerks still exist? Zenanarh ( talk) 13:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC) Totally DisputedAre you going to raise the factually inaccurate information and pov issues on talk page then so people can discuss them? - dwc lr ( talk) 15:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC) What are your issues for adding the tag what is inaccurate and pov. You put it their you haven't posted on the talk page highlighting them. Oh and "The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section." - dwc lr ( talk) 15:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Well what are going to do about it. WP:RM. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC) If you don't like the article title you know what to do. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Is PaxEquilibrium disputing the title? I thought he was asking Imbris if he "approves of the Axis aggression" and "supports the Ustashi" which seems most irrelevant to Tomislav II. - dwc lr ( talk) Also is this the template you want, Template:Disputed title. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Come in handy for me as well. - dwc lr ( talk) 15:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC) |