Hello, Dido789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== {{Reflist}}
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tariq ibn Ziyad. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton ( talk) 18:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Tate. Mirror is not a reliable enough source for this information. ― Blaze Wolf Talkblaze__wolf 21:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Intimate parts in Islam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ashleyknowsthings ( talk) 22:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Intimate parts in Islam, you may be blocked from editing. Ashleyknowsthings ( talk) 22:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Non-denominational Muslim shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash ( talk) 13:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Hello, Dido789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== {{Reflist}}
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tariq ibn Ziyad. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton ( talk) 18:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Tate. Mirror is not a reliable enough source for this information. ― Blaze Wolf Talkblaze__wolf 21:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Intimate parts in Islam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ashleyknowsthings ( talk) 22:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Intimate parts in Islam, you may be blocked from editing. Ashleyknowsthings ( talk) 22:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Non-denominational Muslim shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Skitash ( talk) 13:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.