Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Minster, Thanet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thanks.
Sceptre (
talk)
18:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Why was my edit reverted? It wasn't unconstructive. DiaperPower ( talk) 18:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I have not vandalized anything? Someone blanked the page, and I reverted it. How is that vandalism? DiaperPower ( talk) 18:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
EyeSerene talk 18:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
unblock|I have not vandalized anything? Someone blanked the page, and I reverted it. How is that vandalism?
DiaperPower (
talk)
18:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)}}
I think, taking a closer look at your contributions, I was perhaps rather harsh in my first assessment. For that I sincerely apologise. However, you were reverting to keep inappropriate content in the article, which another editor was trying to tidy up. The article had clearly been vandalised before, and you gave the impression you were edit-warring to keep the vandalism in place. In the future, please try to talk to other editors before reverting their edits - and be careful not to revert too often.
Again, my apologies. You are now unblocked. EyeSerene talk 19:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
![]()
Hello, DiaperPower, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
And here are several pages on what to avoid:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my
talk page, or place |
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
Minster, Thanet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thanks.
Sceptre (
talk)
18:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Why was my edit reverted? It wasn't unconstructive. DiaperPower ( talk) 18:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
I have not vandalized anything? Someone blanked the page, and I reverted it. How is that vandalism? DiaperPower ( talk) 18:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
EyeSerene talk 18:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
{{
unblock|I have not vandalized anything? Someone blanked the page, and I reverted it. How is that vandalism?
DiaperPower (
talk)
18:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)}}
I think, taking a closer look at your contributions, I was perhaps rather harsh in my first assessment. For that I sincerely apologise. However, you were reverting to keep inappropriate content in the article, which another editor was trying to tidy up. The article had clearly been vandalised before, and you gave the impression you were edit-warring to keep the vandalism in place. In the future, please try to talk to other editors before reverting their edits - and be careful not to revert too often.
Again, my apologies. You are now unblocked. EyeSerene talk 19:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)