![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
Diannaa,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Mann Mann (
talk)
03:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Thanks! Happy New Year! — Diannaa ( talk) 15:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year! | |
Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth ( talk) 13:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC) |
Thanks! Happy New Year! — Diannaa ( talk) 15:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Diannaa,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
20:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 20:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Diannaa. Thanks for finding time and joining the discussion on plagiarism in the talk page of the article "Magtymguly" and letting your opinion be known. Your expertise as an admin competent in that area was indeed very helpful. Thanks again and take care! Visioncurve Timendi causa est nescire 09:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa. Would you determine if the close paraphrasing in that article with the para that starts with "Piyush Roy, a critic and film historian ..." is a copyvio? For the time being, I've changed it into a quote Special:Diff/1131338632 The article was split from S. S. Rajamouli. Thanks for your help! — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 18:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio [1] [2]. Would you mind having a look? Dr.Pinsky ( talk) 07:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Diannaa. You previously had a look at Draft:Tulaji Angre and attributed parts to public domain. I had a look at Earwig while reviewing and there are a few sentences and phrases that appear to be identical with two separate Wordpress blogs, 1, 2 and not copied from the public domain reference. I'd like to ask are these copyright violations (i.e., do the Wordpress blogs have copyright, or did the Wordpress blogs simply copy from somewhere else)? Also, if the blogs have copyright and are not circular, is the copyvio bad enough for a revdel? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to bring this to your attention, my sincere apologies if it's not.
I noticed that wiki's plot synopsis for the movie "Alls quiet on the western front" (2022) is identical to the synopsis on IMDB -- word for word.
I'm not proficient enough to tell which was written first, however I wanted to bring this to your attention, because I think that IMDB's may have been up first.
Thank you in advance for your assistance. Nala5150 ( talk) 07:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, lots of copyright violation here, mostly from [6]. When you have a chance....thanks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 05:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa, Could you revdel this edit copied from newindianexpress.com. Thanks - SUN EYE 1 12:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi again. Could you take a look at this one? This is the copyvio report. Not sure if this is a mirror or not. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 12:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, can you RevDel two edits at Talk:List of political parties in Belgium please? They are phishing or blatant spam, so eligible as purely disruptive material, with one of them having the link in the edit summary. It's the two edits by 27.123.255.244 which I reverted here. Thanks! Fram ( talk) 08:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, can you please delete this version of WASH. I had copied there a copyrighted sentence by mistake. Have already corrected it now but the old version still has that sentence. By the way, is there a place where I can request this in a more automated fashion so that I don't have to bother you with having to do this manually? EMsmile ( talk) 12:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
{{
copyvio-revdel}}
. Thanks, —
Diannaa (
talk)
15:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I am entirely new to this Wikipedia thing! Trying to figure out how I can tell which text is copyright on the people with limb difference page I am working on? Thanks for your help! Calculatedfire ( talk) 13:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Globus Bank, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is a clear credible claim of significance, and the duplicated material is basic info not sufficiently creative for copyright. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 22:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I don't quite understand these removals. Your edit summary makes reference to a now blocked user's sockpuppetry, but this material was added in large part to the article in July 2022, while the user was only blocked in November 2022 and only engaged in sockpuppetry following their block in December 2022 - none of which has any obvious bearing on the edits that they made back in July 2022, which at that point were legitimate, making your edit summary seem somewhat retroactive and needless. Is there something that I'm missing here? Iskandar323 ( talk) 15:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Is this too close? It's in the current version, as well. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 21:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The page on Niels Keiding was “work in progress”. Permission will indubitably be speedily given by ISI to quote material from their ‘In Memoriam’, which incidentally was written at the request of ISI by close colleagues of his who, like me, are members of ISI, and who are actively supporting the creation of this article. We are honestly quite astonished by your action, which seems like vandalism. However, copyright rules are copyright rules, so we understand your action. Though a day’s warning might have been nice. Can you please restore the page, but now deleting the material which you consider in violation of copyright rules, so that our work can speedily continue? You also deleted the “talk page” which contained information for us editors, to use in further building the article. Please restore that too? Richard Gill ( talk) 14:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
PS feel free to move deleted pages to my user space. Richard Gill ( talk) 14:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, 74.105.165.178 ( talk · contribs) quacks a lot like Antonio cruz wiki ( talk · contribs). Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 05:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this. I was simply going to give attribution to it being copied from The Master of Ragnarok & Blesser of Einherjar, but the copyvios report does not give me confidence that the information was not a copyvio in the main article as well. Anyway, is there a way to check if this is a mirror? Thanks as always. Onel5969 TT me 17:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa. I work for Perko, Inc. I just added the connected contributor (paid) template to my user profile. I was tasked on writing the Perko, Inc. Wikipedia page. I was not aware that pages were reviewed while still in the draft phase. Most of the article content was removed due to alleged copyrighted content. The source reviewed was from our own commercial product catalog from the E&P Marine website ( one of our distributors). Our product catalogs are listed on our website at [7] https://perko.com/catalog_downloads/. This was our own content written for our product catalogs. You can find that content in our Recreational Catalog via our website on pages 4 and 5. If I can help you clarify anything else please let me know. Thanks. Zeromyst ( talk) 21:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Greetings. I hate to bother you, but a question has come up and I was wondering if you could take some time and look at it for me. I thought I had a clear grasp of copyvios and close paraphrasing. I've written a number of articles on NRHP sites, and always thought I was paraphrasing the underlying NPS source adequately. Recently, another very experienced editor, who I have the utmost respect for, and taken me to task for close paraphrasing/plagiarism on these articles. Now, I think you know my work enough to know how much I care about following policy/guidelines. You can find the relevant discussion at User talk:Onel5969#Possible copyright violations and plagiarism of text in NRHP articles, and further at Talk:Allentown Bridge. Now when I do a copyvio on Bear Spring House, Guardhouse, and Spring it yields this. You are one of, if not the most, competent copyvio editor I know, and I would appreciate your take on all this. Before that other editor and I (and they have offered to help, so the onus would not just be on me) spend quite a bit of time ripping these articles to shreds, it would be nice to have a third set of eyes. I understand if you don't want to take the time to slog through the information, but if you do have a chance, I'd greatly appreciate it. Onel5969 TT me 22:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I see you have come across the Springfield FC page that I created. I note you removed the history despite it being from the clubs website which is under free use to use from. I would appreciate it if you left alone such pieces that you obviously know nothing about. Regards Wilkie2012 ( talk) 23:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Pretty sure the clearly promotional material added in this wholly unacceptable edit, already reverted, is a copyvio. Needs a revdel I think. oknazevad ( talk) 01:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Diannaa. You previously had a look at Draft:Iker Unzu and I have some questions about the review.
First, I don't understand about the added sources being unreliable. Which ones aren't reliable? Because most of them are from well known newspapers in Spain, do you mean the ones that are not about Iker Unzu specifically?
Second, you mentioned that the article is a copy of another article written on the YouTube Wiki, however the article I've written hasn't been copied from absolutely no web, on the contrary: Some time ago I wrote the first draft about Unzu and an unidentified user copied and pasted the information on that Wiki, thus stealing my article. Unfortunately I don't know how to demonstrate this, but perhaps the Wayback Machine could be used?
I do have the article code saved, his copy is badly done and contains errors, since he didn't copy and paste the article correctly when creating it in YouTube Wiki.
How can I improve the article/biography and what references should I delete to make it work?
Iker Unzu is a notable figure in Spain and I think he has the necessary articles/sources to be in Wikipedia, so I'll make the necessary changes to improve the article.
If necessary, I'll report the user who created the copied article on YouTube Wiki for copying.
I'd really appreciate your advice on how to improve it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Youplanetec ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for your help!
Hello Diannaa! The quote you mentioned falls within the fair use policy of Wikipedia editing guidelines. It's a short quote and serves to further clarify what is being said. Please see the shortcut link provided.
Although quoting involves copying another writer's work without permission, it is generally permitted under fair use rules in the United States. However, as is the case with fair-use images, fair-use quotation has limitations:
Please better acquaint yourself with fair use policy in regards to copy-righted materials. If you have other issues with the quote, please leave a note on my talk page and we can discuss. Arkenstrone ( talk) 22:43, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi everybody with an interest in copyright cleanup. After seven years as the primary patroller assessing reports at CopyPatrol, I have reached the point where I am no longer able to work at the volume I have been doing all this time. For the last couple of weeks I have been suffering ill effects from too much computer time, with a sore neck and shoulders, and I have to protect my health to prevent permanent damage to my rotator cuff in particular. I would appreciate it if people could stop by at CopyPatrol daily and assess some reports. You don't have to be an admin to do this task; any experienced editor should be able to quickly figure it out. If you are just starting out, you might like to try assessing reports about biographies or schools – they are pretty easy as the issues are usually quite obvious.
Pinging some CopyPatrol regulars: DanCherek; Wiae; Ymblanter; Red-tailed hawk; Crow; Moneytrees; Sphilbrick. I will also post a similar message at WP:AN. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa,
I'm responding to your note to me regarding "...the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Harold Lehman, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission."
Recently I updated the page about my father, Harold Lehman to correct some inaccuracies stated in the original text. While doing so, I added a few other sentences to provide readers with more information about his other accomplishments. The quote and and one or two sentences about his life, I copied from my website, www.haroldlehman.com, which I created for and about him about 25 years ago. I own the copyright to that material, as well as tapes and videos of my dad, which I also own.
I don't see that you actually removed anything... So please let me know if there is some action you want me to take. I did want to add a citation and possibly a link to the YouTube Channel I created, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfL_gUUPPm8IkGclndmlJmg, but as a "newbie" to editing in Wikipedia, the steps necessary and short-cuts to use were not intuitive.
Thank you.
Lisa Lehman Trager Tragester ( talk) 22:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I got your name from the list of administrators who help with copyvio issues. A {{Copyvio}} template was placed on Epic Systems by an IP editor whose only other recent edit I just reverted. I think that the Epic Systems edit is vandalism, but I'm not sure where to report this. The article seems to be reasonably well sourced, and Earwig's Copyvio Detector give only a 22% chance that there is a violation. Is there a page to list questionable copyright violation notices? Thanks, Leschnei ( talk) 15:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Diannaa
You taught me a lot when I worked on the Greece–Turkey relations page a year ago. I wanted to get your perspective on a different page.
There has been a lively debate over a sentence in Byzantine Empire. Upon researching the sources, I came across text that was very similar to what is written in a source. I wanted to ask for your opinion if you consider this a violation of WP:CLOP. If you agree, your stated opinion may help with the discussions.
Below is my quotation from the source and second the current text being debated.
James, Liz (2010). A Companion to Byzantium. Chichester: John Wiley. ISBN 978-1-4051-2654-0. P.5
“But from the start, there were two major differences between the Roman and Byzantine empires: Byzantium was, for much of its life, a Greek-speaking empire, orientated towards Greek, not Latin culture; and it was a Christian empire”
Although the Roman state continued and its traditions were maintained, modern historians distinguish Byzantium from ancient Rome insofar as it was centred on Constantinople, oriented towards Greek rather than Latin culture and characterised by Eastern Orthodox Christianity.
To spare you reading the Talk page, I've advocating that we add "Greek language" and replace with "Christianity" as per the sources but some people insist on keeping the same text as it's fine even though it isn't. Elias ( talk) 19:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I noticed that on January 21 you warned the user (whom I've now blocked) for copyright violations. Since that time, I believe she's made additional copyright violations. For example, at Hinduism in Canada I noticed at least one relatively small copyright violation, but she's added a lot of material, and I haven't checked each piece. The one I noticed was inserted in this edit and involves the film maker Leena Manimekalai. If you have time, please take a look. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa. I've removed a copyvio on the page added here [8]. There are 149 revisions in between [9]. Does it warrant a revdel? Thanks for handling this! — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the links you sent and I will definitely do everything I can to avoid copyright violations again in the future! MnemonicSonic ( talk) 17:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I saw that on February 4, the draft of Klau Library (Cincinnati) page was speedily deleted for copyright infringement of https://jewishlibraries.org/klau-library-huc-cincinnati/. I provided them with the text that I wrote about the library. The team at jewishlibraries.org said they are willing to provide documentation of that so that the content can be used here, but I'm not sure how that's done. Thanks. ZacSifron ( talk) 18:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa. I hope you are well. The copyvio that has had to be removed before here has happened again. MarnetteD| Talk 01:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, looks like that page has a copyvio: [10]. Especially the first link. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 09:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm going to revert your accusation that I edited in copyrighted content on: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Police_caution&action=history This information is from the Association of Chief Police Officers, a public body from England and Wales. The document itself says 'not protectively marked' (i.e. ready for dissemination), and also has been made available via a FOIA request. Please do not remove content without understanding the laws of the content you are removing in future please. Apeholder ( talk) 19:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
References
First a bit of background; I was alerted via the WP:RFPP board to a user adding a lot of amateur sketches of biographical subjects to articles, some quite inappropriate (e.g. [11] [12]). Now this user has begun adding copyrighted screenshots to those biographical articles, citing me by name in the fair use rationale per my earlier rejection of their drawings. I don't care if they mention me in a rationale, but my concern is that it's not a valid application of fair use. For example, this one used in Jocelyne LaGarde is a screenshot from a film. A screenshot of a film could be appropriate if we were illustrating something specific from the film e.g., a character (vs the actor), or a scene. In that case, the rationale would be that there were clearly no other alternatives in existence outside of screenshots from the film. On the other hand licensable photos of the actor could conceivably exist. Let me know what you think. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa and talk page stalkers: I'm afraid I've discovered a bit of a mess. I found a great chunk of copyvio from this ArchDaily article at UK pavilion at Expo 2010 ( confirmatory Archive.org archive of the original from 2010), which I hope and trust I have now rewritten out of existence. Revision deletion is needed starting with this edit on 7 August 2016 by Hzh. However, looking closely at the history before attempting Template:Copyvio-revdel, I found that on 8 August, in the next edit after the series by Hzh, you had attributed the text to the Thomas Heatherwick article. (You left a notification template on Hzh's user talk. Hzh was at that time extremely prolific in article space, but I see no indication of other copying between articles around that time, or of earlier copyright warnings on their talkpage except for an image issue. I've dropped them a note alerting them to this post and saying I don't blame them at all. I also checked the image that they added to the pavilion article at that time, and FlickrBot passed it on Commons.) The original copyright violation at Thomas Heatherwick was this edit on 22 May 2013 by Jamietron, adding a whole lot of text on different works by Heatherwick, with several sources. Jamietron's only other edit (Xtools confirms no deleted contributions) was the next edit to the Heatherwick article, also adding text (whose phrasing also makes me suspect copyvio of at least one of the two cited sources). Hzh deleted text from that article after their copying, but what remains there concerning the pavilion that is sourced to thisDezeen article may still be copyvio; it and all the other sections to which Jamietron made additions will need to be checked in their current versions against the cited sources. I can't get to that for at least a day (I have a complex edit elsewhere that will take me several more hours to complete), but for information, note that Jamietron made the common error of putting the publication date of the sources into the citation template as accessdates. The sources all predate their addition by some time. If no one else can get to it first, I will commit to checking the Heatherwick article against all of Jamietron's cited sources, within the next couple of days, and then requesting revision deletion. (If the article is just stubbed and then rev-deleted, I'll have to find a cached or mirrored version to do that, since I don't have the admin glasses any more. :-)) Yngvadottir ( talk) 01:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
I have no clue what the issue is since 100% of what I wrote came directly from the Supreme Court opinions. I have no other knowledge of that case, nor did I read any secondary sources. AlwaysVMW ( talk) 03:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
{{
PD-notice}}
template to indicate that the text is public domain and okay to copy verbatim. —
Diannaa (
talk)
21:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Hi everybody. There's quite a few cases listed right now at CopyPatrol, and we could use some help today. You don't have to be an admin to do this task; any experienced editor should be able to quickly figure it out. If you are just starting out, you might like to try assessing reports about biographies or schools – they are pretty easy as the issues are usually quite obvious. Any help you can give today (or any day for that matter) is greatly appreciated. Thank you! — Diannaa ( talk) 19:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Recently you said I was in violation of copyright in something while editing Dost Mohammad Khan. I am a bit confused on what I violated specifically, and what parts were removed specifically. Do you mind elaborating so I could re-write said parts if possible, and what was in violation? Thanks. Noorullah ( talk) 01:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
I recently got flagged for copying material from a public domain source on AN/SPG-55 without attribution. There was an attribution directly below the References section (based on the example given from WP:FREECOPY of Western Allied invasion of Germany), but perhaps that wasn't direct enough. What's the current best practice for placing attributions like that? I know there are several different citation methods floating around depending on the age of the Wikipedia page in question, so I'm not sure what the current method is. AN.FSQ-7 ( talk) 18:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa. Hope you're doing well. Sorry to bother you - I'm pretty sure this addition (with the exception of the quoted texts)
[13] is plagiarism, as it was previously admitted here
[14], yet was added regardless, with no effort made to fix it in the sandbox which it was copied from.
Text from the book;
Text added to the article;
I was also wondering what copyright tool(s) do you use to detect this kind of stuff? I only know of https://copyvios.toolforge.org/, though it isn't the best. Bests. HistoryofIran ( talk) 00:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Hate to bug you, so you know it's about Copyvio stuff. I got this earwig report on the above article, which links to this website. The website says the stuff was posted 2-3 years ago, and the page does contain a copyright notice. But something doesn't feel right here. Thoughts? Onel5969 TT me 16:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank You for your help on Eugene Mattioli Apostolicus ( talk) 16:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC) |
Was slapping the huge banner on this page really necessary when you could've just removed the two relevant paragraphs (neither of which are particularly long or even that original)? I'd be happy to rewrite the relevant content but don't want to go through the tedious bureaucracy required by the copyright problems process to do so. Elli ( talk | contribs) 17:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I want you to tell me that it is copyright, because you all are getting to the point that everything on Wikipedia is copyright, mentioning how many children a politician has on Wikipedia based on a reference that said so, is doing the same vandalism as me, placing data from That the population of Russia fell by half from such a year to such a year, that is not copyright, it is only true information, I ask if people can publish only some on wikipedia that comply with the same way of seeing things, without touching other topics , and with the same political vision, is that it? asked. All joined so I don't edit?. And answer me because the other user blocks what I do and does not answer me-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Tell me Diannaa how can I post that info without assuming it's copyright? Placing the numbers as words, im very glad to want to know?-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm sorry for say that, Its I've been trying all the week to get those things published on Wikipedia without them being copyright.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Ok I'll try it, thank you very much for the help.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
To write the same information but as I can I will write with my own words but I am not very good at writing things, I will try to do it as I can.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Let me know when you are going to delete the information of an article since you did not leave anything, you deleted everything, these historical buildings seem to be buildings created last year with those blank articles, references, photos and everything you erased, and a lot of information that was not copyright-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
how good any ordinary person must be, those who created the millions of articles, giving opinions on the subject and doing all because even a simple phrase, no matter how small it may seem is copyright, that is this is exaggerated. It seems to me that the articles of French churches do not say more than what they should say, the same as in my articles.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Let's get to work, I'm going to write it as it is required, but with the same details, I'm not going to leave it blank, but I think you are going to start blank hundreds of articles and editions.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm sorry if my conversation seems a bit pedantic to you, I have few problems with autism, but I want to raise things cordially, the problem does not take away my right to work outside or write on Wikipedia.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I already rewrote this article with my own words, how could I, what do you think? is approved? Casa del Cabildo (Cartagena, Colombia).-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I ask you very importantly to let me know when you are going to delete some information so that I can try to fix it, I ask you to notify me-- BrugesFR ( talk) 01:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
In Demographics of Russia#Fertility, I already solved, I added everything with my own words.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 02:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Abdul Akter is almost certainly English Patriot Man: see edits to Elvis, Rassenschande, various Nazi topics. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 08:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, regarding removal of hatnotes in this edit, I’m curious as to why. Cheers, Anythingyouwant ( talk) 07:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, regarding to the moin moin edits i made, I just want to know if I can still make another edit. with reliable sources this time. Zmu'az4Z ( talk) 12:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diaanaa,
Well I guess my heading says it all. I have notice that a user is creating a large number of pages some jaw droopingly useless. I have been looking for a place where I could learn who to incite votes to delete or re-direct a page. Filmman3000 ( talk) 00:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
Diannaa,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Mann Mann (
talk)
03:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Thanks! Happy New Year! — Diannaa ( talk) 15:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy New Year! | |
Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth ( talk) 13:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC) |
Thanks! Happy New Year! — Diannaa ( talk) 15:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Diannaa,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
20:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 20:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Diannaa. Thanks for finding time and joining the discussion on plagiarism in the talk page of the article "Magtymguly" and letting your opinion be known. Your expertise as an admin competent in that area was indeed very helpful. Thanks again and take care! Visioncurve Timendi causa est nescire 09:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa. Would you determine if the close paraphrasing in that article with the para that starts with "Piyush Roy, a critic and film historian ..." is a copyvio? For the time being, I've changed it into a quote Special:Diff/1131338632 The article was split from S. S. Rajamouli. Thanks for your help! — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 18:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio [1] [2]. Would you mind having a look? Dr.Pinsky ( talk) 07:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Diannaa. You previously had a look at Draft:Tulaji Angre and attributed parts to public domain. I had a look at Earwig while reviewing and there are a few sentences and phrases that appear to be identical with two separate Wordpress blogs, 1, 2 and not copied from the public domain reference. I'd like to ask are these copyright violations (i.e., do the Wordpress blogs have copyright, or did the Wordpress blogs simply copy from somewhere else)? Also, if the blogs have copyright and are not circular, is the copyvio bad enough for a revdel? Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm not sure if this is the correct place to bring this to your attention, my sincere apologies if it's not.
I noticed that wiki's plot synopsis for the movie "Alls quiet on the western front" (2022) is identical to the synopsis on IMDB -- word for word.
I'm not proficient enough to tell which was written first, however I wanted to bring this to your attention, because I think that IMDB's may have been up first.
Thank you in advance for your assistance. Nala5150 ( talk) 07:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, lots of copyright violation here, mostly from [6]. When you have a chance....thanks. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 05:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa, Could you revdel this edit copied from newindianexpress.com. Thanks - SUN EYE 1 12:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi again. Could you take a look at this one? This is the copyvio report. Not sure if this is a mirror or not. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 12:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, can you RevDel two edits at Talk:List of political parties in Belgium please? They are phishing or blatant spam, so eligible as purely disruptive material, with one of them having the link in the edit summary. It's the two edits by 27.123.255.244 which I reverted here. Thanks! Fram ( talk) 08:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, can you please delete this version of WASH. I had copied there a copyrighted sentence by mistake. Have already corrected it now but the old version still has that sentence. By the way, is there a place where I can request this in a more automated fashion so that I don't have to bother you with having to do this manually? EMsmile ( talk) 12:31, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
{{
copyvio-revdel}}
. Thanks, —
Diannaa (
talk)
15:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I am entirely new to this Wikipedia thing! Trying to figure out how I can tell which text is copyright on the people with limb difference page I am working on? Thanks for your help! Calculatedfire ( talk) 13:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Globus Bank, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is a clear credible claim of significance, and the duplicated material is basic info not sufficiently creative for copyright. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 22:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I don't quite understand these removals. Your edit summary makes reference to a now blocked user's sockpuppetry, but this material was added in large part to the article in July 2022, while the user was only blocked in November 2022 and only engaged in sockpuppetry following their block in December 2022 - none of which has any obvious bearing on the edits that they made back in July 2022, which at that point were legitimate, making your edit summary seem somewhat retroactive and needless. Is there something that I'm missing here? Iskandar323 ( talk) 15:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Is this too close? It's in the current version, as well. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 21:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
The page on Niels Keiding was “work in progress”. Permission will indubitably be speedily given by ISI to quote material from their ‘In Memoriam’, which incidentally was written at the request of ISI by close colleagues of his who, like me, are members of ISI, and who are actively supporting the creation of this article. We are honestly quite astonished by your action, which seems like vandalism. However, copyright rules are copyright rules, so we understand your action. Though a day’s warning might have been nice. Can you please restore the page, but now deleting the material which you consider in violation of copyright rules, so that our work can speedily continue? You also deleted the “talk page” which contained information for us editors, to use in further building the article. Please restore that too? Richard Gill ( talk) 14:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
PS feel free to move deleted pages to my user space. Richard Gill ( talk) 14:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, 74.105.165.178 ( talk · contribs) quacks a lot like Antonio cruz wiki ( talk · contribs). Thanks, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:3F00 ( talk) 05:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this. I was simply going to give attribution to it being copied from The Master of Ragnarok & Blesser of Einherjar, but the copyvios report does not give me confidence that the information was not a copyvio in the main article as well. Anyway, is there a way to check if this is a mirror? Thanks as always. Onel5969 TT me 17:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa. I work for Perko, Inc. I just added the connected contributor (paid) template to my user profile. I was tasked on writing the Perko, Inc. Wikipedia page. I was not aware that pages were reviewed while still in the draft phase. Most of the article content was removed due to alleged copyrighted content. The source reviewed was from our own commercial product catalog from the E&P Marine website ( one of our distributors). Our product catalogs are listed on our website at [7] https://perko.com/catalog_downloads/. This was our own content written for our product catalogs. You can find that content in our Recreational Catalog via our website on pages 4 and 5. If I can help you clarify anything else please let me know. Thanks. Zeromyst ( talk) 21:57, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Greetings. I hate to bother you, but a question has come up and I was wondering if you could take some time and look at it for me. I thought I had a clear grasp of copyvios and close paraphrasing. I've written a number of articles on NRHP sites, and always thought I was paraphrasing the underlying NPS source adequately. Recently, another very experienced editor, who I have the utmost respect for, and taken me to task for close paraphrasing/plagiarism on these articles. Now, I think you know my work enough to know how much I care about following policy/guidelines. You can find the relevant discussion at User talk:Onel5969#Possible copyright violations and plagiarism of text in NRHP articles, and further at Talk:Allentown Bridge. Now when I do a copyvio on Bear Spring House, Guardhouse, and Spring it yields this. You are one of, if not the most, competent copyvio editor I know, and I would appreciate your take on all this. Before that other editor and I (and they have offered to help, so the onus would not just be on me) spend quite a bit of time ripping these articles to shreds, it would be nice to have a third set of eyes. I understand if you don't want to take the time to slog through the information, but if you do have a chance, I'd greatly appreciate it. Onel5969 TT me 22:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I see you have come across the Springfield FC page that I created. I note you removed the history despite it being from the clubs website which is under free use to use from. I would appreciate it if you left alone such pieces that you obviously know nothing about. Regards Wilkie2012 ( talk) 23:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Pretty sure the clearly promotional material added in this wholly unacceptable edit, already reverted, is a copyvio. Needs a revdel I think. oknazevad ( talk) 01:24, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Diannaa. You previously had a look at Draft:Iker Unzu and I have some questions about the review.
First, I don't understand about the added sources being unreliable. Which ones aren't reliable? Because most of them are from well known newspapers in Spain, do you mean the ones that are not about Iker Unzu specifically?
Second, you mentioned that the article is a copy of another article written on the YouTube Wiki, however the article I've written hasn't been copied from absolutely no web, on the contrary: Some time ago I wrote the first draft about Unzu and an unidentified user copied and pasted the information on that Wiki, thus stealing my article. Unfortunately I don't know how to demonstrate this, but perhaps the Wayback Machine could be used?
I do have the article code saved, his copy is badly done and contains errors, since he didn't copy and paste the article correctly when creating it in YouTube Wiki.
How can I improve the article/biography and what references should I delete to make it work?
Iker Unzu is a notable figure in Spain and I think he has the necessary articles/sources to be in Wikipedia, so I'll make the necessary changes to improve the article.
If necessary, I'll report the user who created the copied article on YouTube Wiki for copying.
I'd really appreciate your advice on how to improve it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Youplanetec ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for your help!
Hello Diannaa! The quote you mentioned falls within the fair use policy of Wikipedia editing guidelines. It's a short quote and serves to further clarify what is being said. Please see the shortcut link provided.
Although quoting involves copying another writer's work without permission, it is generally permitted under fair use rules in the United States. However, as is the case with fair-use images, fair-use quotation has limitations:
Please better acquaint yourself with fair use policy in regards to copy-righted materials. If you have other issues with the quote, please leave a note on my talk page and we can discuss. Arkenstrone ( talk) 22:43, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi everybody with an interest in copyright cleanup. After seven years as the primary patroller assessing reports at CopyPatrol, I have reached the point where I am no longer able to work at the volume I have been doing all this time. For the last couple of weeks I have been suffering ill effects from too much computer time, with a sore neck and shoulders, and I have to protect my health to prevent permanent damage to my rotator cuff in particular. I would appreciate it if people could stop by at CopyPatrol daily and assess some reports. You don't have to be an admin to do this task; any experienced editor should be able to quickly figure it out. If you are just starting out, you might like to try assessing reports about biographies or schools – they are pretty easy as the issues are usually quite obvious.
Pinging some CopyPatrol regulars: DanCherek; Wiae; Ymblanter; Red-tailed hawk; Crow; Moneytrees; Sphilbrick. I will also post a similar message at WP:AN. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa,
I'm responding to your note to me regarding "...the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Harold Lehman, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission."
Recently I updated the page about my father, Harold Lehman to correct some inaccuracies stated in the original text. While doing so, I added a few other sentences to provide readers with more information about his other accomplishments. The quote and and one or two sentences about his life, I copied from my website, www.haroldlehman.com, which I created for and about him about 25 years ago. I own the copyright to that material, as well as tapes and videos of my dad, which I also own.
I don't see that you actually removed anything... So please let me know if there is some action you want me to take. I did want to add a citation and possibly a link to the YouTube Channel I created, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfL_gUUPPm8IkGclndmlJmg, but as a "newbie" to editing in Wikipedia, the steps necessary and short-cuts to use were not intuitive.
Thank you.
Lisa Lehman Trager Tragester ( talk) 22:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I got your name from the list of administrators who help with copyvio issues. A {{Copyvio}} template was placed on Epic Systems by an IP editor whose only other recent edit I just reverted. I think that the Epic Systems edit is vandalism, but I'm not sure where to report this. The article seems to be reasonably well sourced, and Earwig's Copyvio Detector give only a 22% chance that there is a violation. Is there a page to list questionable copyright violation notices? Thanks, Leschnei ( talk) 15:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi @ Diannaa
You taught me a lot when I worked on the Greece–Turkey relations page a year ago. I wanted to get your perspective on a different page.
There has been a lively debate over a sentence in Byzantine Empire. Upon researching the sources, I came across text that was very similar to what is written in a source. I wanted to ask for your opinion if you consider this a violation of WP:CLOP. If you agree, your stated opinion may help with the discussions.
Below is my quotation from the source and second the current text being debated.
James, Liz (2010). A Companion to Byzantium. Chichester: John Wiley. ISBN 978-1-4051-2654-0. P.5
“But from the start, there were two major differences between the Roman and Byzantine empires: Byzantium was, for much of its life, a Greek-speaking empire, orientated towards Greek, not Latin culture; and it was a Christian empire”
Although the Roman state continued and its traditions were maintained, modern historians distinguish Byzantium from ancient Rome insofar as it was centred on Constantinople, oriented towards Greek rather than Latin culture and characterised by Eastern Orthodox Christianity.
To spare you reading the Talk page, I've advocating that we add "Greek language" and replace with "Christianity" as per the sources but some people insist on keeping the same text as it's fine even though it isn't. Elias ( talk) 19:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I noticed that on January 21 you warned the user (whom I've now blocked) for copyright violations. Since that time, I believe she's made additional copyright violations. For example, at Hinduism in Canada I noticed at least one relatively small copyright violation, but she's added a lot of material, and I haven't checked each piece. The one I noticed was inserted in this edit and involves the film maker Leena Manimekalai. If you have time, please take a look. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:58, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa. I've removed a copyvio on the page added here [8]. There are 149 revisions in between [9]. Does it warrant a revdel? Thanks for handling this! — DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the links you sent and I will definitely do everything I can to avoid copyright violations again in the future! MnemonicSonic ( talk) 17:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa, I saw that on February 4, the draft of Klau Library (Cincinnati) page was speedily deleted for copyright infringement of https://jewishlibraries.org/klau-library-huc-cincinnati/. I provided them with the text that I wrote about the library. The team at jewishlibraries.org said they are willing to provide documentation of that so that the content can be used here, but I'm not sure how that's done. Thanks. ZacSifron ( talk) 18:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa. I hope you are well. The copyvio that has had to be removed before here has happened again. MarnetteD| Talk 01:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, looks like that page has a copyvio: [10]. Especially the first link. Thepharoah17 ( talk) 09:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm going to revert your accusation that I edited in copyrighted content on: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Police_caution&action=history This information is from the Association of Chief Police Officers, a public body from England and Wales. The document itself says 'not protectively marked' (i.e. ready for dissemination), and also has been made available via a FOIA request. Please do not remove content without understanding the laws of the content you are removing in future please. Apeholder ( talk) 19:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
References
First a bit of background; I was alerted via the WP:RFPP board to a user adding a lot of amateur sketches of biographical subjects to articles, some quite inappropriate (e.g. [11] [12]). Now this user has begun adding copyrighted screenshots to those biographical articles, citing me by name in the fair use rationale per my earlier rejection of their drawings. I don't care if they mention me in a rationale, but my concern is that it's not a valid application of fair use. For example, this one used in Jocelyne LaGarde is a screenshot from a film. A screenshot of a film could be appropriate if we were illustrating something specific from the film e.g., a character (vs the actor), or a scene. In that case, the rationale would be that there were clearly no other alternatives in existence outside of screenshots from the film. On the other hand licensable photos of the actor could conceivably exist. Let me know what you think. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diannaa and talk page stalkers: I'm afraid I've discovered a bit of a mess. I found a great chunk of copyvio from this ArchDaily article at UK pavilion at Expo 2010 ( confirmatory Archive.org archive of the original from 2010), which I hope and trust I have now rewritten out of existence. Revision deletion is needed starting with this edit on 7 August 2016 by Hzh. However, looking closely at the history before attempting Template:Copyvio-revdel, I found that on 8 August, in the next edit after the series by Hzh, you had attributed the text to the Thomas Heatherwick article. (You left a notification template on Hzh's user talk. Hzh was at that time extremely prolific in article space, but I see no indication of other copying between articles around that time, or of earlier copyright warnings on their talkpage except for an image issue. I've dropped them a note alerting them to this post and saying I don't blame them at all. I also checked the image that they added to the pavilion article at that time, and FlickrBot passed it on Commons.) The original copyright violation at Thomas Heatherwick was this edit on 22 May 2013 by Jamietron, adding a whole lot of text on different works by Heatherwick, with several sources. Jamietron's only other edit (Xtools confirms no deleted contributions) was the next edit to the Heatherwick article, also adding text (whose phrasing also makes me suspect copyvio of at least one of the two cited sources). Hzh deleted text from that article after their copying, but what remains there concerning the pavilion that is sourced to thisDezeen article may still be copyvio; it and all the other sections to which Jamietron made additions will need to be checked in their current versions against the cited sources. I can't get to that for at least a day (I have a complex edit elsewhere that will take me several more hours to complete), but for information, note that Jamietron made the common error of putting the publication date of the sources into the citation template as accessdates. The sources all predate their addition by some time. If no one else can get to it first, I will commit to checking the Heatherwick article against all of Jamietron's cited sources, within the next couple of days, and then requesting revision deletion. (If the article is just stubbed and then rev-deleted, I'll have to find a cached or mirrored version to do that, since I don't have the admin glasses any more. :-)) Yngvadottir ( talk) 01:45, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
I have no clue what the issue is since 100% of what I wrote came directly from the Supreme Court opinions. I have no other knowledge of that case, nor did I read any secondary sources. AlwaysVMW ( talk) 03:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
{{
PD-notice}}
template to indicate that the text is public domain and okay to copy verbatim. —
Diannaa (
talk)
21:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Hi everybody. There's quite a few cases listed right now at CopyPatrol, and we could use some help today. You don't have to be an admin to do this task; any experienced editor should be able to quickly figure it out. If you are just starting out, you might like to try assessing reports about biographies or schools – they are pretty easy as the issues are usually quite obvious. Any help you can give today (or any day for that matter) is greatly appreciated. Thank you! — Diannaa ( talk) 19:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Recently you said I was in violation of copyright in something while editing Dost Mohammad Khan. I am a bit confused on what I violated specifically, and what parts were removed specifically. Do you mind elaborating so I could re-write said parts if possible, and what was in violation? Thanks. Noorullah ( talk) 01:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
I recently got flagged for copying material from a public domain source on AN/SPG-55 without attribution. There was an attribution directly below the References section (based on the example given from WP:FREECOPY of Western Allied invasion of Germany), but perhaps that wasn't direct enough. What's the current best practice for placing attributions like that? I know there are several different citation methods floating around depending on the age of the Wikipedia page in question, so I'm not sure what the current method is. AN.FSQ-7 ( talk) 18:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello Diannaa. Hope you're doing well. Sorry to bother you - I'm pretty sure this addition (with the exception of the quoted texts)
[13] is plagiarism, as it was previously admitted here
[14], yet was added regardless, with no effort made to fix it in the sandbox which it was copied from.
Text from the book;
Text added to the article;
I was also wondering what copyright tool(s) do you use to detect this kind of stuff? I only know of https://copyvios.toolforge.org/, though it isn't the best. Bests. HistoryofIran ( talk) 00:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Hate to bug you, so you know it's about Copyvio stuff. I got this earwig report on the above article, which links to this website. The website says the stuff was posted 2-3 years ago, and the page does contain a copyright notice. But something doesn't feel right here. Thoughts? Onel5969 TT me 16:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank You for your help on Eugene Mattioli Apostolicus ( talk) 16:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC) |
Was slapping the huge banner on this page really necessary when you could've just removed the two relevant paragraphs (neither of which are particularly long or even that original)? I'd be happy to rewrite the relevant content but don't want to go through the tedious bureaucracy required by the copyright problems process to do so. Elli ( talk | contribs) 17:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I want you to tell me that it is copyright, because you all are getting to the point that everything on Wikipedia is copyright, mentioning how many children a politician has on Wikipedia based on a reference that said so, is doing the same vandalism as me, placing data from That the population of Russia fell by half from such a year to such a year, that is not copyright, it is only true information, I ask if people can publish only some on wikipedia that comply with the same way of seeing things, without touching other topics , and with the same political vision, is that it? asked. All joined so I don't edit?. And answer me because the other user blocks what I do and does not answer me-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Tell me Diannaa how can I post that info without assuming it's copyright? Placing the numbers as words, im very glad to want to know?-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm sorry for say that, Its I've been trying all the week to get those things published on Wikipedia without them being copyright.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Ok I'll try it, thank you very much for the help.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
To write the same information but as I can I will write with my own words but I am not very good at writing things, I will try to do it as I can.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 23:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Let me know when you are going to delete the information of an article since you did not leave anything, you deleted everything, these historical buildings seem to be buildings created last year with those blank articles, references, photos and everything you erased, and a lot of information that was not copyright-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
how good any ordinary person must be, those who created the millions of articles, giving opinions on the subject and doing all because even a simple phrase, no matter how small it may seem is copyright, that is this is exaggerated. It seems to me that the articles of French churches do not say more than what they should say, the same as in my articles.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Let's get to work, I'm going to write it as it is required, but with the same details, I'm not going to leave it blank, but I think you are going to start blank hundreds of articles and editions.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:26, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I'm sorry if my conversation seems a bit pedantic to you, I have few problems with autism, but I want to raise things cordially, the problem does not take away my right to work outside or write on Wikipedia.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:33, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I already rewrote this article with my own words, how could I, what do you think? is approved? Casa del Cabildo (Cartagena, Colombia).-- BrugesFR ( talk) 00:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
I ask you very importantly to let me know when you are going to delete some information so that I can try to fix it, I ask you to notify me-- BrugesFR ( talk) 01:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
In Demographics of Russia#Fertility, I already solved, I added everything with my own words.-- BrugesFR ( talk) 02:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Abdul Akter is almost certainly English Patriot Man: see edits to Elvis, Rassenschande, various Nazi topics. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 08:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, regarding removal of hatnotes in this edit, I’m curious as to why. Cheers, Anythingyouwant ( talk) 07:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, regarding to the moin moin edits i made, I just want to know if I can still make another edit. with reliable sources this time. Zmu'az4Z ( talk) 12:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Diaanaa,
Well I guess my heading says it all. I have notice that a user is creating a large number of pages some jaw droopingly useless. I have been looking for a place where I could learn who to incite votes to delete or re-direct a page. Filmman3000 ( talk) 00:30, 27 February 2023 (UTC)