Hello, Dennis Dartman, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing!
KylieTastic (
talk) 14:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Again... Hi, Wikipedians!
Please post whatever below.
An article you recently created,
Living in the Eastside, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Hughesdarren (
talk) 12:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in your recent edit to
Nikolai Obukhov, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. I understand that it is frustrating when it is obvious to you that what you say is true -- but Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability is there to ensure that others can determine this came from a reliable source. Thanks,
Antandrus
(talk) 14:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Dennis Dartman!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk) 14:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G47 Nenjiang–Dandong Expressway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Liuxinyu970226 ( talk) 07:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey. You might want to amend this reply. Despite what Kiwi Farms may ardently wish others to believe, Keffals is a woman and uses she/her pronouns. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 04:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
I have pinged u on that page to say the same thing Stephanie921 ( talk) 04:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
YesOnO ( talk) 05:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Dennis Dartman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ GeneralNotability: Not really sure why I have received a notification that I'm now blocked? And what does "GHBH" even mean? This is actually my only account and I have no idea who User:Hank Benson or User:Flora Wilshire are, who are referenced in the block message. I only make constructive edits about topics that I am personally interested in, for free, and would never even think of disrupting Wikipedia. (P.S. I edit on the Wi-Fi of a large public university if that factors into anything. Should I look into using a VPN instead?) Dennis Dartman ( talk) 23:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Technical evidence indicates quite clearly that you have indeed engaged in sockpuppetry. Accordingly, I am declining this request. Just to be clear: As long as you are blocked, you may not edit Wikipedia with any account or IP, VPN or not. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 11:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Not that I'm responding, for truly assessing the correctness of this block requires access to checkuser, but GHBH means: "[u]sing one account for constructive contributions and the other one for vandalism or other types of disruptive editing." Daniel Case ( talk) 07:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Dennis Dartman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Just to be clear, I have 0 alternate accounts and am planning to create none, and I would be very interested in knowing the specifics of the "quite clear technical evidence" in question preventing an unblock. Again, I edit at a university, so if any of my fellow classmates are also Wikipedia editors in their spare time, I promise I'm not aware of it. Dennis Dartman ( talk) 13:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In the light of what has been said below, I have to decline your request. JBW ( talk) 18:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
EDIT: Bruh, I just checked one of the user's profiles and they aren't even from the U.S... Dennis Dartman ( talk) 13:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Dennis Dartman, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for
your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the
help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing!
KylieTastic (
talk) 14:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Again... Hi, Wikipedians!
Please post whatever below.
An article you recently created,
Living in the Eastside, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Hughesdarren (
talk) 12:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in your recent edit to
Nikolai Obukhov, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. I understand that it is frustrating when it is obvious to you that what you say is true -- but Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability is there to ensure that others can determine this came from a reliable source. Thanks,
Antandrus
(talk) 14:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Dennis Dartman!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk) 14:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G47 Nenjiang–Dandong Expressway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Liuxinyu970226 ( talk) 07:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey. You might want to amend this reply. Despite what Kiwi Farms may ardently wish others to believe, Keffals is a woman and uses she/her pronouns. Sideswipe9th ( talk) 04:08, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
I have pinged u on that page to say the same thing Stephanie921 ( talk) 04:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
YesOnO ( talk) 05:18, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Dennis Dartman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ GeneralNotability: Not really sure why I have received a notification that I'm now blocked? And what does "GHBH" even mean? This is actually my only account and I have no idea who User:Hank Benson or User:Flora Wilshire are, who are referenced in the block message. I only make constructive edits about topics that I am personally interested in, for free, and would never even think of disrupting Wikipedia. (P.S. I edit on the Wi-Fi of a large public university if that factors into anything. Should I look into using a VPN instead?) Dennis Dartman ( talk) 23:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Technical evidence indicates quite clearly that you have indeed engaged in sockpuppetry. Accordingly, I am declining this request. Just to be clear: As long as you are blocked, you may not edit Wikipedia with any account or IP, VPN or not. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 11:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Not that I'm responding, for truly assessing the correctness of this block requires access to checkuser, but GHBH means: "[u]sing one account for constructive contributions and the other one for vandalism or other types of disruptive editing." Daniel Case ( talk) 07:33, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Dennis Dartman ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Just to be clear, I have 0 alternate accounts and am planning to create none, and I would be very interested in knowing the specifics of the "quite clear technical evidence" in question preventing an unblock. Again, I edit at a university, so if any of my fellow classmates are also Wikipedia editors in their spare time, I promise I'm not aware of it. Dennis Dartman ( talk) 13:48, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In the light of what has been said below, I have to decline your request. JBW ( talk) 18:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
EDIT: Bruh, I just checked one of the user's profiles and they aren't even from the U.S... Dennis Dartman ( talk) 13:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)