Hello, DenGlad. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about in the page
Draft:Passcovery Suite, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW ( talk) 21:31, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello DenGlad. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Passcovery Suite, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:DenGlad. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DenGlad|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Fiddle
Faddle
06:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I’m sorry that some links seemed to you general for the IT industry. There are none of them. To some extent all of them relate to Passcovery Suite. The number of links is conditional upon the structure of Passcovery Suite itself. The program includes modules of other "Single-Format Utilities" by Passcovery. Consequently, the number of links increased. Do you recommend reducing their number up to one per fact?
As I declared, when I confirmed the title to the images, I am really a trusted representative of the company, but I did not receive direct remuneration for the article preparation and placement. Could you please tell me how to display it on my page correctly?
Hello, DenGlad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Passcovery Suite".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 13:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, DenGlad. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about in the page
Draft:Passcovery Suite, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW ( talk) 21:31, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello DenGlad. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Passcovery Suite, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:DenGlad. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DenGlad|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Fiddle
Faddle
06:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I’m sorry that some links seemed to you general for the IT industry. There are none of them. To some extent all of them relate to Passcovery Suite. The number of links is conditional upon the structure of Passcovery Suite itself. The program includes modules of other "Single-Format Utilities" by Passcovery. Consequently, the number of links increased. Do you recommend reducing their number up to one per fact?
As I declared, when I confirmed the title to the images, I am really a trusted representative of the company, but I did not receive direct remuneration for the article preparation and placement. Could you please tell me how to display it on my page correctly?
Hello, DenGlad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Passcovery Suite".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 13:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)