gh
Thanks for uploading Image:Nilah Bowles.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:RanDom 094.jpg. The copy called Image:RanDom 094.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 01:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wi20010410 MichaelClarkeDuncan Granitz 167237.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nilah Bowles.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 ( talk) 19:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
gh
Thanks for uploading Image:Nilah Bowles.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:RanDom 094.jpg. The copy called Image:RanDom 094.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 01:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wi20010410 MichaelClarkeDuncan Granitz 167237.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nilah Bowles.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 ( talk) 19:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)