Hello, I'm
Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Owen Coyle has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
17:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello my comments were factually accurate and I am going to restore them.
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Owen Coyle, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
18:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Done, hope you're happy.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Burnley F.C., you may be
blocked from editing.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
18:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
My comments are factually accurate and sourced. My comments will be reinstated. Please stop removing or I will report for being disruptive.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Burnley F.C..
Mattythewhite (
talk)
19:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fenix down (
talk)
21:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Dcroberts91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was adding correct factual information with sources and was still removed, despite relating to club.
Decline reason:
If you make additional unblock requests that do not address the reason for your block, your talk page access will be revoked as well. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dcroberts91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
your reason here Dcroberts91 ( talk) 21:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL Query me! 23:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dcroberts91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Completely confused. I was accused of not being relevent. But the content I add was all relevent and relating to the clubs history :/ and removed partisan comments on another page and made neutral
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL Query me! 23:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fenix down (
talk)
21:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Dcroberts91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I added factual information for a club I support Blackburn Rovers. Editing facts that were inaccurate and in places partisan. I added sources for all my positive edits? In no way was I being disruptive
Decline reason:
If you think that adding phrases such as "much history to be proud of", "proud fact" or "incredibly highly attended" make the article less partisan, your conflict of interest is far too strong to neutrally edit the page. Huon ( talk) 22:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Hello, I'm
Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Owen Coyle has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
17:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello my comments were factually accurate and I am going to restore them.
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Owen Coyle, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
18:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Done, hope you're happy.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Burnley F.C., you may be
blocked from editing.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
18:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
My comments are factually accurate and sourced. My comments will be reinstated. Please stop removing or I will report for being disruptive.
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Burnley F.C..
Mattythewhite (
talk)
19:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fenix down (
talk)
21:07, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Dcroberts91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was adding correct factual information with sources and was still removed, despite relating to club.
Decline reason:
If you make additional unblock requests that do not address the reason for your block, your talk page access will be revoked as well. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dcroberts91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
your reason here Dcroberts91 ( talk) 21:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL Query me! 23:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Dcroberts91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Completely confused. I was accused of not being relevent. But the content I add was all relevent and relating to the clubs history :/ and removed partisan comments on another page and made neutral
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL Query me! 23:41, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Fenix down (
talk)
21:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Dcroberts91 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I added factual information for a club I support Blackburn Rovers. Editing facts that were inaccurate and in places partisan. I added sources for all my positive edits? In no way was I being disruptive
Decline reason:
If you think that adding phrases such as "much history to be proud of", "proud fact" or "incredibly highly attended" make the article less partisan, your conflict of interest is far too strong to neutrally edit the page. Huon ( talk) 22:54, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.