You wouldn't know the meaning of the word, let alone it's implementation in daily life. MrSpammy ( talk) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Will you be contributing in the mediation? 24.114.255.83 ( talk) 21:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
You were actively recruited by a player of the game, and you yourself are a player of the game. You have a stake in this. You are defending something you like, and are not being objective. The criticisms section is noteworthy, and valid MrSpammy ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC).
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
MrSpammy (
talk)
12:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
World War II Online. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. —
Smilers
☺
Talk
17:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Datenschleuder, why don't you leave the criticisms page alone until AFTER the mediation has run its course? If, after a NEUTRAL third party says to get rid of it, I'll relent. But your edits are not constructive. Your dedication to the game is touching, but it's not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. MrSpammy ( talk) 15:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Just thought I would let you know that as per WP:DRC User:MrSpammy is perfectly entitled to remove those messages from his talk page. The only messages that may not be removed from a user talk page are declined unblock requests while the block is still in effect, confirmed sockpuppetry notices, and shared IP header templates for unregistered editors. If you have any questions regarding this feel free to drop me a comment and I'll do my best to answer it. — Smilers ☺ Talk 19:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
You wouldn't know the meaning of the word, let alone it's implementation in daily life. MrSpammy ( talk) 19:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Will you be contributing in the mediation? 24.114.255.83 ( talk) 21:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
You were actively recruited by a player of the game, and you yourself are a player of the game. You have a stake in this. You are defending something you like, and are not being objective. The criticisms section is noteworthy, and valid MrSpammy ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 21:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC).
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
MrSpammy (
talk)
12:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
World War II Online. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. —
Smilers
☺
Talk
17:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey Datenschleuder, why don't you leave the criticisms page alone until AFTER the mediation has run its course? If, after a NEUTRAL third party says to get rid of it, I'll relent. But your edits are not constructive. Your dedication to the game is touching, but it's not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. MrSpammy ( talk) 15:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Just thought I would let you know that as per WP:DRC User:MrSpammy is perfectly entitled to remove those messages from his talk page. The only messages that may not be removed from a user talk page are declined unblock requests while the block is still in effect, confirmed sockpuppetry notices, and shared IP header templates for unregistered editors. If you have any questions regarding this feel free to drop me a comment and I'll do my best to answer it. — Smilers ☺ Talk 19:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)