![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
for your cooperation and willingess to listen. Dougweller ( talk) 20:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Anonimu and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Codrin.B ( talk) 02:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:University of Pristina/RfC: split proposal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Leon Jordan was a member of the Missouri General Assembly when he was assassinated in 1970, and meets WP:POLITICIAN on that basis alone. In addition, he was considered the most powerful politician in Missouri, his murder is unsolved, and the case has been discussed in reliable sources for decades. Did you read the references? Please reconsider. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
You've made some really significant improvements to the article, especially on the prose. Concerning POV, I will try and sort out the issues myself. I think it is difficult for you to see the points where you are writing from your POV and not a neutral one. I personally agree with your POV (the Pakistanis attracted atrociously) but we need to leave such judgements to the reader. The topic is interesting, and I think it would be great if we could collaborate to get the article to GA status. Thanks. -- He to Hecuba ( talk) 23:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Occupy Wall street. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 18:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
A registered editor restored deleted content. I'd revert it, but I don't want to get involved in a edit warring dispute again. Platinum Star ( talk) 20:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 06:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Re: the Risley ref that you have just added - Herbert Hope Risley is not a reliable source for racial stuff. He was, indeed, a scientific racist and his theories have been blown out of the water. - Sitush ( talk) 17:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Proposing site ban for Darkness Shines. Thank you. Hasteur ( talk) 18:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 19:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Don't want to clutter up the RFC header and don't want to get too much involved into the subject. Therefore I leave a response to
your comment here. If it is about the notability of the source the RFC should've been drafted somehow like this:
Is the
Failed States Index by
Fund for Peace published by
Foreign Policy notable enough to be included in this article or not?
Just my thought as it seems to be just about that and the current RFC title can be confusing for editors not already familiar with the past discussions. Thanks for your clarification tho.
TMCk (
talk)
20:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Calabe 1992 02:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
JCAla ( talk) 19:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Darkness Shines. Thanks for noticing my comments and responding to them. The way I like to work is to put the {{ GOCEinuse}} box at the top of the article while I'm editing, and to replace it with {{ under construction}} overnight or if I'm taking a significant break. While the inuse box is there, please could you avoid editing, so that we can avoid edit conflicts? Thanks. -- Stfg ( talk) 21:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:European Union. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 08:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Human Rights Abuses has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
mabdul
09:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello Darkness Shines, with this edit, in enacting a consensus of the community reached at the Administrator's Noticeboard, I hereby inform you that you are banned from
The discussion leading to the ban may be viewed here. Regards, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 18:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
I was going through the article and subsection on India and added a line acc to the source "without evidence" later came to the talk page to see a lot of discussion on that. Feel free to update my edit. -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 11:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
for continuous fight against vandals and POV pushers, and helping Wiki retain its neutral face. Keep up the good work Ðℬig XЯaɣ 11:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hi there, I was just wondering on what basis you've been removing all blog references from the Ghulam Azam page - there is no blanket prohibition on using such references on Wikipedia, as far as I'm aware? In particular, the Eric Avebury statement is available on his own blog here: http://ericavebury.blogspot.com/2011/07/bangladesh.html. Let me know.
Abbasfirnas887 ( talk) 13:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your reply (I'm never sure whether I should respond on your talk page or mine)! The BLP policy says:
Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.
and
Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject (see below).
This seems to me clear on the point that material from blogs *on the living person* himself/herself is not allowed - but those references weren't on the person, as far as I'm aware. They were concerned with the ICT as an institution.
Abbasfirnas887 ( talk) 14:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
DS Thanks for providing the sources. Please note that the Correct and official name of the school is Carmel School, Giridih since it is a convent school often in media and newspapers it is named as Carmel Convent School , regards -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 17:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 02:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Please let me know why was the Periyar (river) article change reverted? Pearll's Sun TALK 15:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:International recognition of South Sudan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 10:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi DarknessShines. I reverted your reversion of DeltaQuad's closure. The matter has been discussed in the previous RfC so I suggest you either wait a bit before trying again or use some other means of dispute resolution. Also, you might want to use an arm's length approach to your interaction with TopGun for the time being. Just a suggestion. -- regentspark ( comment) 13:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Cheers DS, I have had an article on the GA nomination list for some time now. What about you review my article and I review yours. At the GA, they say it is explicitly allowed to say "you review mine, I review yours". What do you say? JCAla ( talk) 14:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indigenous peoples. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
For Providing sources and help in saving Carmel School Giridih from AFD, cheers ! ! ! Ðℬig XЯaɣ 22:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Taliban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Armitage ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:World Without Nazism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 10:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Darkness Shines. I've noticed a mistake you keep making, which I've been having to correct in my copy edits. When you make a reference like this:
then when you use the same reference a second time, you've been repeating the definition with all the details. This is wrong. What you should do the second time is just this:
Take a look at this diff for an example.
While I'm here, "the abuses were only stopped by the intervention of the Indian armed forces" is not obvious and did need citation. I understand why you did that edit summary, but it was wrong and quite rude. Historical facts may be well known or poorly known, depending on the readership, but they are never "obvious". In fact, this bit of history is poorly remembered in the west, even by those old enough to have been able to read newspapers when it happened. To the younger generation of westerners, it's all but unknown. Requests for citations need to be met.
Keep well and take care. -- Stfg ( talk) 11:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
12:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Darkness Shines ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not violated the interaction ban. Sal seems to think I have done so twice, I have not. Sending an article to AFD is not an WP:IBAN violation. Nor is this [2] an IBAN violation. I did not name him, I did not refer to his edits and as can be seen here [3] I was trying to avoid mentions of he who must not be named at all costs. I see no other way I could have asked that question on the BLP board. And if asking about a BLP violation is an interaction violation then how am I meant to raise such query's in the future? I have not violated the IBAN as laid down under the policy, and I request this block be lifted. Darkness Shines ( talk) 12:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Do you seriously think that referring to a user by an evasive term like "He who must not be named" instead of by username somehow doesn't count as referring to him? The interaction ban says "making reference to or commenting on him or his actions", not "making reference to or commenting on him or his actions by name". You certainly did make reference to, and commented on, him and his actions. JamesBWatson ( talk) 17:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If you return to my talk page and look at the thread just above yours, you will see the answer. Nyttend ( talk) 12:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
No I do not think "He who must not be named" is referring to him, it is in fact the opposite. I did not comment on his actions, as I pointed out in the diff [6] I edited my post to try and not refer to him. If this has been a deliberate violation on my part I would accept this block, it was not. I have written "He who must not be named" at ANI and nobody said it was a violation FFS. Darkness Shines ( talk) 17:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunately "he who is currently blocked" continues to refer to the other editor in an WP:IBAN. This block should be longer, however, the terms are clear: you cannot refer to them by nicknames or whatever ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hey, I think only Salvio could possibly unblock you (if he wants to), if you make a productive suggestion on future behavior to him. :) But don't know if he actually will. It's, however, worth a try. JCAla ( talk) 17:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not intentionally violated the IBAN, I posted "what I am not allowed to say" at ANI and nobody there said this was a violation. Now that I know it is I will refrain from saying it again. A three day block for a mistake is obscene. Please unblock me. Darkness Shines ( talk) 18:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I want to believe you and, therefore, I am about to unblock you. But, please, please, please in future avoid referring to TopGun's actions at all costs, either by mentioning him directly or by using periphrases. You are supposed to ignore him, no matter what he does. If he violates Wikipedia's policies, there are many other editors who can called him out. You just ignore him. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Pindi lost its mind. JCAla ( talk) 08:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey, asked three more things in the review. The final questions after I made a second review as far as I can see now. Sorry, not trying to give you a hard time. :) JCAla ( talk) 09:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Answered on the GA review. Two of the three things still in discussion then, I think, we are good to go. JCAla ( talk) 08:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Oh happy day II. It has already started. JCAla ( talk) 06:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Can you let me know if I got it right this time around [7] Thanks Darkness Shines ( talk) 10:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines. It was completely out of order for you do do that removal. First, the SPI for Highstakes00 is still open. Secondly, you also removed comments of mine, and I am in good standing. Thirdly, sockpuppetry is not one of the reasons listed at WP:TPO for removing talk page content, so you have no excuse to do that. If there is a reason to remove any of it, an admin should decide it. You have no authority over what other people are allowed to do and say on wikipedia. Please don't try to exercise any. -- Stfg ( talk) 15:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Falun Gong. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 23:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HandsomeFella ( talk) 19:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
19:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Congratulations DS, I have passed the article as a good article. Whatever the reasons you wrote it, be assured its language is not politicized and it serves a good purpose of informing people about what happened to these people in Bangladesh. JCAla ( talk) 20:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
JCAla ( talk) 18:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frederick "Rick" Barton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 03:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Liberation montage.png | GA Award! |
Thank you for all the work you did in making Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War a Good Article; your work is much appreciated! All the best, -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 10:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Darkness Shines. Thanks for what you put on my user page. I don't deserve it and was tempted to take it off, but I'm going to keep it there to celebrate our collaboration. I hope to do it again some time. P.S. a good remedy for a hangover is a vitamin B tablet washed down with a glass of orange juice :) Take care, -- Stfg ( talk) 15:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Intellectual property activism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 16:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Undo my edits. Do I have to say it in a different language for you to understand? Stop undoing my edits. Contribute your content independently. Mar4d ( talk) 13:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ushuaia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:15, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dru of Id ( talk) 16:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 18:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
A block proposal has been initiated at AN/I. You may wish to participate in it.— cyberpower ( Chat)( WP Edits: 521,558,913) 15:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
If I am proven wrong I myself will re add the stuff I reverted I promise NerosRevenge ( talk) 20:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
TransporterMan ( TALK) | DR goes to Wikimania! 22:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I'm awarding you this Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Jagello ( talk) 22:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC) |
hey man, saw that you posted on my talk page some time ago. sorry to leave you hangin for the last few months, but i've come to realize that wikipedia really isn't the place for casual, time-strapped editors like me, so for all intents and purposes, i've disconnected my keyboard, metaphorically speaking. saw the noticeboard thing today and tried to give some perspective. i know you're fighting the good fight, but just be patient with the admins, and hopefully they'll start to see the logic in what you're saying. i think walking them through one good edit war may very well be enough. for what it's worth, in the end...truth alone triumphs...good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.115.152 ( talk) 05:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 07:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Aren't you under 1RR restriction? You have gone too far at Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir. Is the other user confirmed sock? -- SMS Talk 18:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I know it's frustrating, but comments like "Your a jerk" are not acceptable, even if you are provoked - please stay cool and follow the appropriate procedures -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 18:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
18:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Darkness Shines ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
You have got to be joking? I am constantly targeted by this sock and I get a block for saying he is a jerk? Darkness Shines ( talk) 18:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Accept reason:
As per agreement below -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 18:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. But in this stub form, it probably should be merged with Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir. Who is the puppet master? Has he been banned? I'd also reiterate my earlier request for you to remain civil and polite even and especially in the face of provocation. AshLin ( talk) 03:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Northern Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 20:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inter-Services Intelligence support for terrorism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter-Services Intelligence support for terrorism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SMS Talk 18:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
The Joint Signal Intelligence Bureau(JSIB) provide support with communications to groups in Kashmir.
[1]
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Magog the Ogre (
talk)
19:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Sorry? Were exactly have I mentioned the person with whom I have the IBAN? [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Magog_the_Ogre&diff=481718124&oldid=481715817] And this is not an IBAN violation, I am allowed to ask about such things if I think there is a violation going on, communicating and coordinating off wiki to get others to do your work is a violation. It was OK for an SPI to get filed against me? Am I not allowed to also ask a question regarding suspicious behavior?[[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines#top|talk]]) 19:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)}}
Why did you bring him back into this story? I knew it would end like this. JCAla ( talk) 20:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
User:Najamkhan16 probable sock of User :Wikiwriter786 IP 200.98.197.34 is posting from Brazil, SA, doubt it is a sock. Darkness Shines ( talk) 16:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
You can't really say that's the ISI, I mean you've done excellent work on anti-vandalism but making such rash statements like this with no logic does not help. ( Wiki id2 (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC))
... in good ol'Punjab. Are you sure enough to file a SPI? JCAla ( talk) 18:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
I filed an SPI based on your research. JCAla ( talk) 19:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
[15] Can someone ask Ashlin to pop over so I my tell him why this is terrible. Sources, no good, use western academic sources only, any fro mthe region will be seen as biased. I have sources for what you have written, just ask should you need some or some research done. No internal to ISI, so any random reader will think "who"? You name names from your sources, who are they? What makes their opinions notable? More research and better sourcing my friend. Darkness Shines ( talk) 19:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
for your cooperation and willingess to listen. Dougweller ( talk) 20:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Anonimu and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, Codrin.B ( talk) 02:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:University of Pristina/RfC: split proposal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Leon Jordan was a member of the Missouri General Assembly when he was assassinated in 1970, and meets WP:POLITICIAN on that basis alone. In addition, he was considered the most powerful politician in Missouri, his murder is unsolved, and the case has been discussed in reliable sources for decades. Did you read the references? Please reconsider. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
You've made some really significant improvements to the article, especially on the prose. Concerning POV, I will try and sort out the issues myself. I think it is difficult for you to see the points where you are writing from your POV and not a neutral one. I personally agree with your POV (the Pakistanis attracted atrociously) but we need to leave such judgements to the reader. The topic is interesting, and I think it would be great if we could collaborate to get the article to GA status. Thanks. -- He to Hecuba ( talk) 23:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Occupy Wall street. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 18:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
A registered editor restored deleted content. I'd revert it, but I don't want to get involved in a edit warring dispute again. Platinum Star ( talk) 20:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Campaign for "santorum" neologism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 06:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Re: the Risley ref that you have just added - Herbert Hope Risley is not a reliable source for racial stuff. He was, indeed, a scientific racist and his theories have been blown out of the water. - Sitush ( talk) 17:13, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Proposing site ban for Darkness Shines. Thank you. Hasteur ( talk) 18:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:PNS Ghazi. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 19:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Don't want to clutter up the RFC header and don't want to get too much involved into the subject. Therefore I leave a response to
your comment here. If it is about the notability of the source the RFC should've been drafted somehow like this:
Is the
Failed States Index by
Fund for Peace published by
Foreign Policy notable enough to be included in this article or not?
Just my thought as it seems to be just about that and the current RFC title can be confusing for editors not already familiar with the past discussions. Thanks for your clarification tho.
TMCk (
talk)
20:39, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Calabe 1992 02:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
JCAla ( talk) 19:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Darkness Shines. Thanks for noticing my comments and responding to them. The way I like to work is to put the {{ GOCEinuse}} box at the top of the article while I'm editing, and to replace it with {{ under construction}} overnight or if I'm taking a significant break. While the inuse box is there, please could you avoid editing, so that we can avoid edit conflicts? Thanks. -- Stfg ( talk) 21:28, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:European Union. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 08:15, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Template:Infobox Human Rights Abuses has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
mabdul
09:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello Darkness Shines, with this edit, in enacting a consensus of the community reached at the Administrator's Noticeboard, I hereby inform you that you are banned from
The discussion leading to the ban may be viewed here. Regards, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 18:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
I was going through the article and subsection on India and added a line acc to the source "without evidence" later came to the talk page to see a lot of discussion on that. Feel free to update my edit. -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 11:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
for continuous fight against vandals and POV pushers, and helping Wiki retain its neutral face. Keep up the good work Ðℬig XЯaɣ 11:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hi there, I was just wondering on what basis you've been removing all blog references from the Ghulam Azam page - there is no blanket prohibition on using such references on Wikipedia, as far as I'm aware? In particular, the Eric Avebury statement is available on his own blog here: http://ericavebury.blogspot.com/2011/07/bangladesh.html. Let me know.
Abbasfirnas887 ( talk) 13:35, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your reply (I'm never sure whether I should respond on your talk page or mine)! The BLP policy says:
Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.
and
Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject (see below).
This seems to me clear on the point that material from blogs *on the living person* himself/herself is not allowed - but those references weren't on the person, as far as I'm aware. They were concerned with the ICT as an institution.
Abbasfirnas887 ( talk) 14:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
DS Thanks for providing the sources. Please note that the Correct and official name of the school is Carmel School, Giridih since it is a convent school often in media and newspapers it is named as Carmel Convent School , regards -- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 17:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:7 World Trade Center. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 21:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Pseudofusulina ( talk) 02:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Please let me know why was the Periyar (river) article change reverted? Pearll's Sun TALK 15:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:International recognition of South Sudan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 10:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi DarknessShines. I reverted your reversion of DeltaQuad's closure. The matter has been discussed in the previous RfC so I suggest you either wait a bit before trying again or use some other means of dispute resolution. Also, you might want to use an arm's length approach to your interaction with TopGun for the time being. Just a suggestion. -- regentspark ( comment) 13:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Cheers DS, I have had an article on the GA nomination list for some time now. What about you review my article and I review yours. At the GA, they say it is explicitly allowed to say "you review mine, I review yours". What do you say? JCAla ( talk) 14:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indigenous peoples. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 22:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
For Providing sources and help in saving Carmel School Giridih from AFD, cheers ! ! ! Ðℬig XЯaɣ 22:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC) |
Hi. When you recently edited Taliban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Armitage ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:World Without Nazism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 10:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi Darkness Shines. I've noticed a mistake you keep making, which I've been having to correct in my copy edits. When you make a reference like this:
then when you use the same reference a second time, you've been repeating the definition with all the details. This is wrong. What you should do the second time is just this:
Take a look at this diff for an example.
While I'm here, "the abuses were only stopped by the intervention of the Indian armed forces" is not obvious and did need citation. I understand why you did that edit summary, but it was wrong and quite rude. Historical facts may be well known or poorly known, depending on the readership, but they are never "obvious". In fact, this bit of history is poorly remembered in the west, even by those old enough to have been able to read newspapers when it happened. To the younger generation of westerners, it's all but unknown. Requests for citations need to be met.
Keep well and take care. -- Stfg ( talk) 11:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
12:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Darkness Shines ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not violated the interaction ban. Sal seems to think I have done so twice, I have not. Sending an article to AFD is not an WP:IBAN violation. Nor is this [2] an IBAN violation. I did not name him, I did not refer to his edits and as can be seen here [3] I was trying to avoid mentions of he who must not be named at all costs. I see no other way I could have asked that question on the BLP board. And if asking about a BLP violation is an interaction violation then how am I meant to raise such query's in the future? I have not violated the IBAN as laid down under the policy, and I request this block be lifted. Darkness Shines ( talk) 12:46, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Do you seriously think that referring to a user by an evasive term like "He who must not be named" instead of by username somehow doesn't count as referring to him? The interaction ban says "making reference to or commenting on him or his actions", not "making reference to or commenting on him or his actions by name". You certainly did make reference to, and commented on, him and his actions. JamesBWatson ( talk) 17:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If you return to my talk page and look at the thread just above yours, you will see the answer. Nyttend ( talk) 12:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
No I do not think "He who must not be named" is referring to him, it is in fact the opposite. I did not comment on his actions, as I pointed out in the diff [6] I edited my post to try and not refer to him. If this has been a deliberate violation on my part I would accept this block, it was not. I have written "He who must not be named" at ANI and nobody said it was a violation FFS. Darkness Shines ( talk) 17:29, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunately "he who is currently blocked" continues to refer to the other editor in an WP:IBAN. This block should be longer, however, the terms are clear: you cannot refer to them by nicknames or whatever ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hey, I think only Salvio could possibly unblock you (if he wants to), if you make a productive suggestion on future behavior to him. :) But don't know if he actually will. It's, however, worth a try. JCAla ( talk) 17:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not intentionally violated the IBAN, I posted "what I am not allowed to say" at ANI and nobody there said this was a violation. Now that I know it is I will refrain from saying it again. A three day block for a mistake is obscene. Please unblock me. Darkness Shines ( talk) 18:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I want to believe you and, therefore, I am about to unblock you. But, please, please, please in future avoid referring to TopGun's actions at all costs, either by mentioning him directly or by using periphrases. You are supposed to ignore him, no matter what he does. If he violates Wikipedia's policies, there are many other editors who can called him out. You just ignore him. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Pindi lost its mind. JCAla ( talk) 08:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey, asked three more things in the review. The final questions after I made a second review as far as I can see now. Sorry, not trying to give you a hard time. :) JCAla ( talk) 09:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Answered on the GA review. Two of the three things still in discussion then, I think, we are good to go. JCAla ( talk) 08:25, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Oh happy day II. It has already started. JCAla ( talk) 06:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Can you let me know if I got it right this time around [7] Thanks Darkness Shines ( talk) 10:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines. It was completely out of order for you do do that removal. First, the SPI for Highstakes00 is still open. Secondly, you also removed comments of mine, and I am in good standing. Thirdly, sockpuppetry is not one of the reasons listed at WP:TPO for removing talk page content, so you have no excuse to do that. If there is a reason to remove any of it, an admin should decide it. You have no authority over what other people are allowed to do and say on wikipedia. Please don't try to exercise any. -- Stfg ( talk) 15:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Falun Gong. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 23:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HandsomeFella ( talk) 19:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
19:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Congratulations DS, I have passed the article as a good article. Whatever the reasons you wrote it, be assured its language is not politicized and it serves a good purpose of informing people about what happened to these people in Bangladesh. JCAla ( talk) 20:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
JCAla ( talk) 18:04, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frederick "Rick" Barton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 03:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Liberation montage.png | GA Award! |
Thank you for all the work you did in making Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War a Good Article; your work is much appreciated! All the best, -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 10:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Darkness Shines. Thanks for what you put on my user page. I don't deserve it and was tempted to take it off, but I'm going to keep it there to celebrate our collaboration. I hope to do it again some time. P.S. a good remedy for a hangover is a vitamin B tablet washed down with a glass of orange juice :) Take care, -- Stfg ( talk) 15:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Intellectual property activism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 16:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Undo my edits. Do I have to say it in a different language for you to understand? Stop undoing my edits. Contribute your content independently. Mar4d ( talk) 13:47, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ushuaia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 05:15, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dru of Id ( talk) 16:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 18:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
A block proposal has been initiated at AN/I. You may wish to participate in it.— cyberpower ( Chat)( WP Edits: 521,558,913) 15:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
If I am proven wrong I myself will re add the stuff I reverted I promise NerosRevenge ( talk) 20:13, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
TransporterMan ( TALK) | DR goes to Wikimania! 22:19, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I'm awarding you this Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Jagello ( talk) 22:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC) |
hey man, saw that you posted on my talk page some time ago. sorry to leave you hangin for the last few months, but i've come to realize that wikipedia really isn't the place for casual, time-strapped editors like me, so for all intents and purposes, i've disconnected my keyboard, metaphorically speaking. saw the noticeboard thing today and tried to give some perspective. i know you're fighting the good fight, but just be patient with the admins, and hopefully they'll start to see the logic in what you're saying. i think walking them through one good edit war may very well be enough. for what it's worth, in the end...truth alone triumphs...good luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.115.152 ( talk) 05:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan sentiment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 07:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Aren't you under 1RR restriction? You have gone too far at Human rights abuses in Azad Kashmir. Is the other user confirmed sock? -- SMS Talk 18:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I know it's frustrating, but comments like "Your a jerk" are not acceptable, even if you are provoked - please stay cool and follow the appropriate procedures -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 18:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. --
Boing! said Zebedee (
talk)
18:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Darkness Shines ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
You have got to be joking? I am constantly targeted by this sock and I get a block for saying he is a jerk? Darkness Shines ( talk) 18:30, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Accept reason:
As per agreement below -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 18:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. But in this stub form, it probably should be merged with Human rights abuses in Jammu and Kashmir. Who is the puppet master? Has he been banned? I'd also reiterate my earlier request for you to remain civil and polite even and especially in the face of provocation. AshLin ( talk) 03:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Northern Ireland. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 20:15, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inter-Services Intelligence support for terrorism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inter-Services Intelligence support for terrorism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SMS Talk 18:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
The Joint Signal Intelligence Bureau(JSIB) provide support with communications to groups in Kashmir.
[1]
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Magog the Ogre (
talk)
19:42, 13 March 2012 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Sorry? Were exactly have I mentioned the person with whom I have the IBAN? [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Magog_the_Ogre&diff=481718124&oldid=481715817] And this is not an IBAN violation, I am allowed to ask about such things if I think there is a violation going on, communicating and coordinating off wiki to get others to do your work is a violation. It was OK for an SPI to get filed against me? Am I not allowed to also ask a question regarding suspicious behavior?[[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines#top|talk]]) 19:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)}}
Why did you bring him back into this story? I knew it would end like this. JCAla ( talk) 20:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
User:Najamkhan16 probable sock of User :Wikiwriter786 IP 200.98.197.34 is posting from Brazil, SA, doubt it is a sock. Darkness Shines ( talk) 16:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
You can't really say that's the ISI, I mean you've done excellent work on anti-vandalism but making such rash statements like this with no logic does not help. ( Wiki id2 (talk) 17:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC))
... in good ol'Punjab. Are you sure enough to file a SPI? JCAla ( talk) 18:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
I filed an SPI based on your research. JCAla ( talk) 19:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
[15] Can someone ask Ashlin to pop over so I my tell him why this is terrible. Sources, no good, use western academic sources only, any fro mthe region will be seen as biased. I have sources for what you have written, just ask should you need some or some research done. No internal to ISI, so any random reader will think "who"? You name names from your sources, who are they? What makes their opinions notable? More research and better sourcing my friend. Darkness Shines ( talk) 19:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)