Please be respectful
I archived my talk page as it was nearing 90kb and was taking a bit too long to load. The course you were just on was moved -- let me know on my talk page when you've taken a look at it. :) Banaticus ( talk) 04:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
User:Jimbo Wales worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Off2riorob (
talk)
16:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Why did you put a semi-protection notice on my talk page?-- BabbaQ ( talk) 18:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Selena Gomez. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Your edits show a pattern of odd changes: templates that don't apply, images that don't exist, items in people's user pages. It raises the question of whether the edits are honest errors or whether they're an attempt to disrupt Wikipedia. — C.Fred ( talk) 18:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
TN
X
Man
19:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I think I'm getting banned for somthing I didn't do...
DarkfireII2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I really want my account back DarkfireII2 (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case ( talk) 15:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DarkfireII2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
what happened to freedom of speech,oh and btw,wikipedia didn't upload my files.......before the ban. DarkfireII2 ( talk) 13:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is no free speech on Wikipedia. Even if there was, vandalism is not free speech. Regardless, compromised accounts are never unblocked, and we don't care if your little brother did it. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 15:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DarkfireII2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I never was beigng evasive,this account is the only one i have,yes i will make sure my bro doesn't get on my account,it will never happen again....Happy? DarkfireII2 (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If your brother got a hold of the account that's it. Over. Fat lady sang. Goodbye. We do not unblock admittedly compromised accounts. Start a new one if you want to edit productively. — Daniel Case ( talk) 16:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 16:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
DarkfireII2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will not vandilize again. DarkfireII2 ( talk) 16:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your repeated requests to be unblocked are anything but convincing, and are becoming a nuisance. You have been advised on how to proceed from here -- continued requests such as these will only result in revocation of talk page editing privileges. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 16:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Talk page access has been revoked. Daniel Case ( talk) 16:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Please be respectful
I archived my talk page as it was nearing 90kb and was taking a bit too long to load. The course you were just on was moved -- let me know on my talk page when you've taken a look at it. :) Banaticus ( talk) 04:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
User:Jimbo Wales worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Off2riorob (
talk)
16:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Why did you put a semi-protection notice on my talk page?-- BabbaQ ( talk) 18:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Selena Gomez. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Your edits show a pattern of odd changes: templates that don't apply, images that don't exist, items in people's user pages. It raises the question of whether the edits are honest errors or whether they're an attempt to disrupt Wikipedia. — C.Fred ( talk) 18:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
TN
X
Man
19:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I think I'm getting banned for somthing I didn't do...
DarkfireII2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I really want my account back DarkfireII2 (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case ( talk) 15:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DarkfireII2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
what happened to freedom of speech,oh and btw,wikipedia didn't upload my files.......before the ban. DarkfireII2 ( talk) 13:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is no free speech on Wikipedia. Even if there was, vandalism is not free speech. Regardless, compromised accounts are never unblocked, and we don't care if your little brother did it. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 15:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DarkfireII2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I never was beigng evasive,this account is the only one i have,yes i will make sure my bro doesn't get on my account,it will never happen again....Happy? DarkfireII2 (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If your brother got a hold of the account that's it. Over. Fat lady sang. Goodbye. We do not unblock admittedly compromised accounts. Start a new one if you want to edit productively. — Daniel Case ( talk) 16:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 16:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
DarkfireII2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will not vandilize again. DarkfireII2 ( talk) 16:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your repeated requests to be unblocked are anything but convincing, and are becoming a nuisance. You have been advised on how to proceed from here -- continued requests such as these will only result in revocation of talk page editing privileges. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 16:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Talk page access has been revoked. Daniel Case ( talk) 16:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)