Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Huns, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Huns was changed by Danluosoccer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939703 on 2011-10-07T03:39:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 03:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Huns with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Trusilver
03:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Huns with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Trusilver
03:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wikipedia was changed by Danluosoccer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906565 on 2011-11-17T18:06:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 18:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
McGeddon (
talk)
18:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel luo
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Daniel luo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as
Daniel luo, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our
policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the
Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
GouramiWatcher
(Gulp)
17:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
21:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Huns, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Huns was changed by Danluosoccer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939703 on 2011-10-07T03:39:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 03:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Huns with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Trusilver
03:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Huns with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
Trusilver
03:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wikipedia was changed by Danluosoccer (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906565 on 2011-11-17T18:06:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 18:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
McGeddon (
talk)
18:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel luo
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Daniel luo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 17:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as
Daniel luo, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our
policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the
Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
GouramiWatcher
(Gulp)
17:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
21:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)