This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'm not the one with the neutrality or currency regarding my POV. Besides, in terms of the British National Party, Stormfront, etc.; I can back up everything that I'm saying in terms of them being modern Nazi offshoots and organizations? Nickidewbear ( talk) 02:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Also, the mainstream and historians with a general consensus aren't always right; and if you use common sense, you'll know that socialism is on the left, not right, side of the political spectrum. Besides, I called the Nazi Party "not classifiable" on the political axis. So, if any one of us has the neutrality problem, it's more you than me. Nickidewbear ( talk) 05:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Daniel Bill was born in 1962 (21st March I think). Cant give you any formal citation for this but I was at primary and secondary school with him from 1967 to 1980
-- Rxw ( talk) 19:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
http://www.givemefootball.com/championship/jermaine-pennant-can-be-a-role-model-for-youngster - details his career, describes him as having a "colourful past" and role as probation officer and that he served time for armed robbery
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bH0CmX4maOQ - goal against Barnsley
http://www.soccerbase.com/players_details.sd?playerid=6039 - goal stats relating to season totals and evidence that he only played 43 games in 3 years at Orient before his move - hence the £100k fee for a reserve being suspicious.
The Cosenza player chasing him is folklore in Southend and common knowledge
I appreciate that the slight problem with cult heroes is where the line falls between unrefutable fact and knowledge of fans there at the time, however, all comments are honest and accurate as far as I know them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.214.195 ( talk) 20:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Any news on this and how I best go about updating the page?! —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
87.194.173.131 (
talk) 14:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
It's actually on the section. I needed assistance on the two articles. I thought I saved the message. The covert racism article seems to have gained the attention of some BNP supporters.
Nemogbr (
talk) 11:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
--
Nemogbr (
talk) 11:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Just a heads-up in case you feel the need to defend yourself against this silliness. Snied ( talk) 06:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on The Wimpy Kid Movie Diary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
i
B
e
n 00:51, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as The Wimpy Kid Movie Diary. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. i B e n 01:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Daniel, I have commented on the talk page of my entry. You are incorrect to state that the subject is covered in the main article as the question is not even mentioned. However I will accept your deletion of my Glasgow, Lanarkshire page on condition that you remove it completely, including the redirect. the effect of leaving the redirect in place is to reinforce the misapprehension that I am trying to remedy. it would be like redirecting Washington, Tyne and Wear to Washington DC.
Paul Coyne ( talk) 20:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
+ Daniel, how do I propose the redirect be deleted? Your point about London/Middlesex is exactly one of the points I make when correcting people. There very definitely is a need to state that Glasgow is not in Lanarkshire as it is frequently asserted to me that it is. About 50% of post sent to Glasgow is incorrectly addressed as a result of this ignorance. I don't see the same mistake being made wrt London, which is precisely my point. Paul Coyne ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC).
Hi, both edits are false. The initial intro page has been vandalized by user T22878. The actual intros tell that these 3 castes (more than 10% of the Tamil population) are of Tamil Royal lineage!!... The ref given are false, just playonwords (thevar, dewar are (respectable) words before being a caste name). These castes used to be soldiers of the kings and Land lords (please check the initial refs) and after the collapse of then ancient order some of them managed to found their little kingdoms (this was the initial intro of this wiki page, much more accurate). Thanks. 90.46.32.29 ( talk) 18:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks. I was actually leaving a note for the speedy-tagger, a conscientious and hard-working patroller, to explain my declining his tag. I'm grateful for your application of the stub tags, general clean-up and moving the article to its correctly-spelled title. If you have any ideas of a portal where this article could find someone to champion it further, I would be grateful; I think this has barely enough for retention, but needs work by someone interested in the topic. But thanks for your help. Accounting4Taste: talk 17:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Please, go make your voice heard in the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse scientific method! Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 14:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
To answer your question, it was my goof. When I saw that the first reference was for her age, I accidentally went to the external links section. That's where I got '77 from, the first link of the ext. links. Whether that link is considered reliable or not, I don't know. But I know that IMDb is not considered reliable for biographical info, so I've removed the date entirely. I don't have the time now to look into whether or not that first ext link, Eros-something, is reliable or not. I just know that IMDb isn't. If this is so contentious, then it should probably have a section on the talk page. If for no other reason than to help clarify for those who haven't done all the research and seen the manager's attempts to set back the clock. Dismas| (talk) 19:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting anonymous IP's repeated attempts to remove any reference to audience figures for children's programmes on Radio 7. I've tried starting a discussion to check out what the objection is but nobody answers so it becomes hard not to get involved in an editting war. With your revert it looks less like I'm some lonely maniac fighting against the sea. Alistair Stevenson ( talk) 13:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
The majority of people reading this article will be suffering from sinusitis or will know someone who is. Very few people, unless they are studying medicine, would choose to read up on a subject such as sinusitis. You are correct in stating that wikipedia is encyclopedic however that should not stop plain language being used and references being made to everyday products so that the average reader can better understand the concept (in this case natural nasal sprays). The word 'claim' has been used extensively with regards to natural nasal sprays so their is no bias. You state that the trials are laughable, which in effect means you think that the Institute of Asthma and Allergies in the U.S. is laughable. I can assure it is far from it and has helped many people - please try visiting their website. Why you seen fit to remove a section of this article which could be beneficial to peoples health is beyond me.
I look forward to your comments. P.s. I have undone your changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trump22 ( talk • contribs) 13:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I noticed your comment here about using (or misusing) Archive.org to push a point of view. Could you take a look here, and if you feel that you can form an opinion based on the evidence you see, help advise this dispute? - CRedit 1234 ( talk) 18:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Further, take a look at this, and think about what that means regarding saying a business was identified as having been "operating illegally", when not a single mainstream news source, or any public court record, seem to substantiate the exceptional claim. A few of us think two tag-teamers are trying to use Wikipedia to push a libelous claim, but I'd like an independent analysis. - CRedit 1234 ( talk) 18:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Its meant for our community alone if u belong to the community u can take part, its complicated to handle users like you please dont mistake me.The discussion about the kshatriyas is unwanted because Tamil is far superior and older than sanskrit and kshathriya is a sanskrit terminology for martial race and mukkulathor need not prove anything to so called "aryans" our community belong to southern region in India dont mix up with northerners our traditions and culture are different and yes THEVARS belong to the Great emperors of CHOLA, PANDYA, and CHERA dynasty. South region of india belongs to the KUMARI KANDAM(LEMURIAN CONTINENT),Where languages and culture born please refer to it. I'm sorry i'm not here to argue with you i want to tell the fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karikala thevar ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback, The people who discussed were not polite and the statements were harsh and the truth is been covered, moreover people don't have any idea and ignorant about the community and they can clarify the doubts but must not make irrelevant statement and that is the reason for removing unwanted topics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karikala thevar ( talk • contribs) 09:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, My request to move this to an article page has been denied because that title is blacklisted. I'm a bit unclear on how to request a controversial move. Any help? Bruce Swanson 23:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm not editing or removing anything how can u call vandalism?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.202.134.104 ( talk) 09:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC) I'm expecting ur answer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.202.134.104 ( talk) 09:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Do you own this wikipedia Mr.Daniel? I simply discussed in that page u r so rude and harsh anyways thanx for forigners contribution to Tamil people. I'm quiting this wiki and u'r taken in to notification once again thanx a lot.-- Be2bi ( talk) 20:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
There appears to be quite a bit of backlog for the CheckUsers on WP:SPI. Thankfully, the sockpuppet you have been monitoring is fairly easy to identify, even if his rapid edits are tedious to revert. Hopefully the backlog will clear soon. The upcoming elections might help matters, though the results of the elections are pretty far off in the future. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 00:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello Daniel,
I hope you are right, but good faith is hardly there when it comes to Chaldeans vs Assyrians. Assyrian Nationalists have been forcing the name "Assyrian" for a while. I just didn't know they were doing it in Wikipedia as well. Anyway, what I have removed from the article is simply the "Assyrianization" stuff that has no references to it. I had to clean this article from that nonsense. I believe that politics should not produce fault information. My intentions are solely for the correctness of this Wikipedia article.
Thanks -- King Of Babylonia ( talk) 11:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Daniel,
My name is Jonathan Horley and I have read your article on discount-licensing.com which you wrote a number of months ago. On the discussion page you asked if there were any other competitors or players in the market apart from Usedsoft. I founded discount-licensing.com along with Noel Unwin in 2005 and left the company 2 years ago. There are a number of articles from the November 2005 launch, of which this is one [1].
They can all be found by typing "Noel Unwin" "Jonathan Horley" into google. Last year I started Value Licensing which can be accessed at [2].
Given that I co-founded discount-licensing.com and I am have set-up Value Licensing in the same area, I believed it would be worth mentioning in the discount-licensing.com article. Even though I think that this information is appropriate to go into the article, I do however realise that if I wrote directly into the article this would be a clear conflict of interest. This is why I have come to you directly.
My suggested line in the article would read as follows under the Company history section incorporating the first line which is already there:
Updated below Jonhorley ( talk) 14:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
I apologise if the above is not in the correct format but this is the first one I have attempted!
Kind regards, Jonathan-- Jonhorley ( talk) 12:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
You previously expressed an opinon on this subject at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big data. There is a new debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big data (2nd nomination) and your comments would be welcome there. I42 ( talk) 05:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Last October, you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Its undeletion has now been requested here, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it and given Ms Lindman advice about references on her talk page. I am now notifying you in case you wish to take it to AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 20:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello Mr. DanielRigal. I have sent you an e-mail (through Wikipedia) about an article that caught my eye and the issues surrounding it. Thank you. IronBreww ( talk) 03:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Daniel.
Regarding this tennis match that has started to ensue over Mr Horley, we did not actually read the history and assumed My Horley was simply making the amendments himself - hence the deletions.
Mentioning other competitors does round off the Discount-Licensing.com article quite well and so we are not complaining about that – therefore, we are not opposed to including ‘Value Licensing’ as another competitor as creates some awareness that the market is growing, but surely mention it alongside other competitors in the next paragraph alongside Usedsoft who have been in the market much longer and are not working from home like Mr Horley is - it adds little credibility to this secondary market when the opening sentence refers to a tiny new competitor who’s website is hard to find via the web and incapable to demonstrating any sales/profit based on its most recent accounts. Note that there is another more longer term competitors that has been operating in the market from the start called 'Susensoftware' (also based in Germany) that you may want to include, - it also sells second hand SAP like ourselves. Note that there have been two other UK competitors that we are aware of, but both have since closed.
So, specifically regarding Mr Horley, we unfortunately cannot go into detail for legal reasons as to why he left, but we are simply concerned ongoing about having Mr Horley's name directly associated with Discount-Licensing.com in this way and I presume that the original objective of your article on Discount-Licensing.com was not to plug Mr Horley's new company, which is clearly what Mr Horley is trying to accomplish with his insertion the first sentence of this article.
I trust that this explains our position and that the article is amended back to where it originally was, including a mention of the other competitor companies later on, rather than plugging an 'ego' of a previous ex-employee of Discount-Licensing.com.
Regards, Noel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noel Unwin ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Admin,
Anons, most probably just one person toying with different IPs, are keeping busy doing the "usual" with matching deceptive edit summaries. It may be best to protect the page from non-established users for the time-being, but it's whatever you deem best. Thank you! – Shannon Rose Talk 15:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
DanielRigal, I am inviting you to join the discussions here. The issues are similarly (but not 100%) related to IronBreww's lobbying above. Here is the link. I am trying to prove to the #1 Soriano critic (see the link) that the lead section of the Eliseo Soriano article is POV and more importantly, libelous. 180.191.66.131 ( talk) 03:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the picture to thumbnail and organizing the Categories.
I'm a total neophyte at this. JJBrannon ( talk) 04:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
I have one quick question for you. Why am I a sockpupeteer becasue I like to stand up for the rights of people whom have done nothing to you? The Classic Metal Show has had nothing to do with you, and yet you still said, and I quote, "This is not a article for inclusion in a serious encyclopedia." Well, good sir, I believe that you have awaken the sleeping giant. This is a crime, as the show has many loyal fans of which I am one of, as many more are. I respect your authority, but do not agree with the position that you have taken on The Clasic Metal Show article. I wish you much luck, and thank you for rewriting many articles for those who may use them and the valuble information that they hold. I especially like your section on the VNC protocol, which I use all of the time! Thank you, SlayerFan716 ( talk) 23:46, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Some US editors see the left-right spectrum as dictated solely by the extent of government control. The reasons for control are seen as irrelevant. Here is a link to a video that explains their viewpoint. Notice that this reverses the left and right at the time of the French revolution. The Fox News commentator Glen Beck actually wrote an introduction to Cleon Skousen's book and the John Birch Society co-sponsored the Conservative Political Action Conference this year. Here is a link to an article about Canada, where both British and American conservatism developed independently of each other. TFD ( talk) 11:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Daniel so sorry for misunderstanding. I don't have intention to Spam around or to remove something at Wiki for promoting Forum. I was only try to add some interesting information's and remove one my outdated post. Because of that I'm registered, it'll be logical to spam anonymous here...
One more time sorry for misunderstanding and my bad English.
Best Regards,
Samker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samker ( talk • contribs) 16:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey. About the Image its just small and not attractive or interesting at all and most importantly is used in other pages like Mount Judi .. you can check it out .. Its not attractive to keep a small fuzzy image in two articles why not change one .. The one I kept was in the Russian Wikipedia translation i think Moodswingster ( talk) 10:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Ok true but can you try to get another Jewish depiction because this one is used in other articles... Moodswingster ( talk) 03:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Did you really mean to blank the page? - [9]. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 23:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, My name is Philip Warner. Sir Mark Wienberg, who worked with Professor Jim Gower in creating the shape of the Financials Services Act in the early 80's, wrote to me in the early 90's saying "I can understand what you trying to say. I just hope others can too" He then set about depolarising the sales system that he had put together. Resulting in depolarisation. Sir Mark had been the Chairman of MIBOC the Marketing of Investment Boards Organising Committee and was largely responsible for putting polarisation on the map in the first place. My view is not cynical. It is steeped in philosophy and requires depth of thought. I was an IFA in the 80's and often wrote for Financial Times Business Information. I quit the industry altogether after putting forward the philosophy that undermined the system. These days I am a happy .com multimillionaire. You can't hold a good man down as they say. Regards Phil Warner 62.56.106.232 ( talk) 16:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your efforts, but please be careful not to inadvertently bit newcomers with your deletion tagging- if the content is not blatantly inappropriate, there's usually no harm in leaving it for a few hours to see what, if anything, the author does with it before sticking a PROD tag on it, which may frighten them off. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
... for clearing the nastiness from my User page. Much appreciated. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 18:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
That's OK, nothing bad happened ;) Kubek15 write/ sign 11:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Nice to "meet" you over at the Talk:Frixion page where we were discussing notability. :) Pianotech ( talk) 23:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
What I said WAS true LOOK at these videos! http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=r9Ik-FT4bh8&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=asb2apgceSU&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=4Hf5HyGqwnM&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=Wc3SGTeo_RU&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=GUAEKcTIt64&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=M4ewhMMWGSE&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=X2FK-tq7i6U&feature=related —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.179.164.81 ( talk) 13:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, was wondering if you could lend a third opinion to the inclusion of content Here (again I know). Just a third opinion on the inclusion of arguably notable enough material. Thanks Monkeymanman ( talk) 19:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Is it possible to submit article for a revison by editor before publishing ie. avoid multiple edits Baukadm ( talk) 18:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Yes a new article, the reason is that original article is edited/reverted by you, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Baukadm Maybe it would be simpler to submit article to you for revision before it is published, and not have multiple edits Baukadm ( talk) 19:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Also is there a way to contact you by email? Baukadm ( talk) 19:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Howdy, Can you anyway provide your email for contact,
maybe you can provide information ie. that is not available
in your reply.
Baukadm (
talk) 18:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Daniel, This article is not up to any standard. Lot of the information is not accurately presented. Is verbose encyclopedic ?? Also what is the deal on references, when references are origional opinions of other people anyway. You should let my version stand and let the people/sikhs decide if it fits their understanding of the religion. Please revert it back. However I was anyway planning to make it "encyclopedic" but you removed it. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.28.137.229 ( talk) 17:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Daniel. I am just about at the end of my patience with AzureFury. I am about to give him a third notice to restore the lede written by the editors who voted to keep the article. As I explained at Talk:Defamation_of_religions_and_the_ United_Nations#Lead_section, his lede is unacceptable because it is not a summary of Defamation of religions and the UN; AzureFury's lede is a shoddy summary of an editorial by Canada.com's Hui Min Neo combined with the opinions of Bennett Graham and AzureFury. If you prefer my lede, I request that you ask AzureFury to restore it. If you believe AzureFury's lede is tolerable, please tell me why. Thank you for defending the article. PYRRHON talk 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Discount-licensing.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
-- mitchsurp -- (
talk) 22:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, thanks for the contact. Stumbeling at my first attempts on wiki The current page on the Airmans Letter was entirely focussed on the film. Perhaps you are right about merging it with the existing entry I have his CO's copies of uk and usa editions of the book with newspaper clippings and a note from the airman's mother, hence the photo's . What do you suggest is the appropriate action ?
kind regards david David raines ( talk) 22:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the speedy deletion from this recently-created article as it doesn't appear to meet A7: it asserts notability, stating that the website has conducted interviews with numerous notable artists, which is sufficient to pass the CSD. If you feel that the article may not meet the GNG, please take it to AfD; since the article's only just been created, it's possible that further sourcing will reveal that it is able to meet WP:GNG. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 20:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) I just reverted a rather massive insertion of what looked like harrassing religious propaganda into your talk page since it appeared to be pure vandalism; let me know if I was incorrect to do so and I'll avoid doing so again next time. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 10:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Why do you want to delete Hare Krishna portal??? Today on holy day of Ekadashi??? Usually only demons or big sinners do this... Are you one of them??? Actually delete atheism portal instead. Yes, do this... I can help you —Preceding unsigned comment added by HareKrishnaPortal ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
That was a really tl;dr rant on the MFD. Wanna tone it down some? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 18:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
In the article macaroni casserole you were right, it is minced meat. Thank you for changing it and thank you for writing it in a nice way (sometimes some Wikipedians can be quite nasty) :-) Leopea ( talk) 11:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello DanielRigal, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ezida TV, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I'm finding plenty of non-wiki references to Ezida TV and relationship to Kurdistan TV - redirect appears to make sense ATM. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am a contributor to the New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company page, and noticed that you had placed several tags on the page using "Friendly." These tags included the fact that it needed more sources and notability, the fact that it read like an advertisement, and that there was suspicion of a conflict of interest. Several changes have been made since the page was fist created. Can you take a look at it again, and notify me if any more changes need to be made for those tags to taken down? Any thoughts and concerns would be appreciated.
Thanks, Helpfulhand ( talk) 14:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
I added a list of the subpages associated with this portal to the deletion discussion. I suppose others should comment on whether they think those should be deleted as well. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
This IP is the third that has a similar pattern of vandalism. The previous two are 80.42.235.17 and 80.42.227.142, both of which were blocked at one point. -- Skywatcher68 ( talk) 20:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I have undone your edit of redirecting it to Hindu units of measurement as the current article covers much more than Hindu units of measurement. It also wrongly claims the Vedas elaborate on details of Hindu cosmology like the mention of the lokas such Patala, which are not found in the Vedas, but in the later Puranas. I am not sure from where "Number of species of birds" etc. is derived.-- Redtigerxyz Talk 12:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Material was removed because it was unsourced or poorly sourced, if you add material back to that article ensure that it is based on a Reliable source. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 15:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
And I'll remove it - don't add material to BLPs with tags, either source it or don't bother. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 15:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
For now it has to stay - no it doesn't. Core policy is that unsourced material can be removed at any time. Do not readded unless you have RS. --
Cameron Scott (
talk) 16:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Is Marxism not Anarchy and Communism? -- 76.19.74.59 ( talk) 05:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, regarding page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Hanley Please give me chance to finish the page, I was editing it to put references in and you made changes before I got chance to save the page creating an edit conflict.. I am totally new to Wikipedia so it is taking me a little time to get the page correctly formatted - Thanks BJM76 ( talk) 21:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice and help! I will try and make the required format changes over the next day or so, best wishes
BJM76 (
talk) 21:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Daniel,
Please can you tell me why you have such an aversion to the suggested improvements on the fish fingers page?
If I had a pound every time someone from Grimsby claimed that they hail form the birthplace of the fish finger I would be a very wealthy man.
I think highlighting the widespread misunderstanding can only add to the accuracy and interest of the page.
I await your comments with interest.
Mr Fish Oracle —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fish oracle ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
It has nothing to do with local rivaly. I think that accuracy is paramount however you seem to be operating a questionable degree of censorship that worries me.
If I were researching fish fingers I would want to know about the common misconception. Your refusal to add it merely promotes ignorance where processed fish is concerned.
I urge you to reconsider your decision.
Mr Fish Oracle
Daniel
Many thanks for your informative and generally well researched piece on fishfingers.
Unfortunately i feel you are factually inaccurate on their true origin. Along with frozen prawns and scampi the birthplace of the popular fish based snack is Great Grimsby in North East England.
Whilst this may seem a trivial matter to many, my grandfather was responsible for this pioneering work in food processing and therefore your factual inaccuracies are a cause for significant upset for my family. I look forward to an amended piece.
regards
Trevor Findus —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.49.193.107 ( talk) 15:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Concur with your assessment; I've soft-blocked the Ip for three months, and will follow up with an e-mail to the school. That was a little over the line from 'school boy nonsense'. Kuru (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page Vrenator ( talk) 08:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Sorry to bother you in the midst of new page patrolling but I see from your homepage that you live in Guildford and are interested in trains.
I was wondering if there's any way to get a cheap ticket between London and Guildford on SWT (or anyone else for that matter)? Whenever I search, the return fare seems to come in at £13 or more which seems pretty steep for what is not a very long journey. Thanks — Amakuru ( talk) 23:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Regarding your removal of Nikki Haley from the list of notable Sikhs at the Sikh article, I understand your reluctance to allow a professed convert to Methodism to remain in a list of Sikhs, but I thought I'd explain why I thought Haley qualified as a notable entry in this list. However, I won't add her name back to the list myself; I'll leave it to you to decide whether that's appropriate.
According to her article, Haley was born and raised as a Sikh; she has stated that she converted to Methodism shortly before marrying, but she still attends both Sikh and Methodist services. Her unique religious background (unique among American politicians, I mean) may well be one of the most remarkable aspects of her career, given the bias and hostility in U.S. politics against politicians with non-Christian backgrounds. She is certainly notable from the perspective of Sikh culture: her political career may represent one of the greatest inroads Sikhism has made into U.S. politics thus far. Which doesn't say much for tolerance in U.S. politics, but my point is that it makes her Sikh background rather noteworthy from a Sikh perspective.
Anyway, that was my rationale; it's up to you if you want to re-add her name. AtticusX ( talk) 08:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Just to let you know, one of your recent truncated comments has made by "Wiki Words of Wisdom". :o) Redthoreau -- ( talk) 08:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, user user:Dharani Maran is continuously removing the originial research tag from the Paravar page whereas there are many doubtful claims, misinterpretation of sources... Claims such as Kshatriya, Pandya royal lineage are pure POV. Many sources have been provided in the discussion page concerning the origins of the Paravar caste. None of them I have been taken into account. This user is also threatening other editors (see talk page)who do not share his POV. Please check and do something. Thank you. 83.202.208.125 ( talk) 18:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please readd the tags removed by this user. He has no right to remove these tags whereas his claims of Aristocratic/Kshatriya/ Pandya royal lineage are not sourced by proper refs. For ex, have a look on the ref 'Caste and tribes of southern India', the author, Edgar Thruston, never tell that the Paravars are Kshatriyas or from Pandya lineage but only that they claim these... This is clearly manipulation, original research!... Please readd the tags and ask for page complete protection. Thank you. 83.202.208.125 ( talk) 17:43, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-- The Big Garage Fan ( talk) 12:29, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
you guys are weirdly quick -- and don't look at the talkback for specific pages. The page was deleted by HJ WHILE I was correcting it, so the hangon tag was for THAT page. If you guys could coordinate, maybe my hour of unsaved work about a great theatre company wouldn't be pulled in the 5 minutes between getting the flag notice and it getting pulled. Sheesh -- Kevjkelly ( talk) 01:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:School and university projects. DGG ( talk ) 02:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
The need for disambiguation was not so much to do with trains or states that might have trains but to do with South West. There was a discussion on the use of the name South East Region. The end result was that it need to be renamed to South-East Region, Ireland. The ruling was that countries ought to be separated by comma while other entities ought to be separated by parentheses. Since "Train" is integral to the name of the company, then the name "South East (trains)" would be silly. Nevertheless, the title is too generic not to have a country delimiter. Who knows, another country might pop up some day with their own South East trains. Laurel Lodged ( talk) 12:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Im just wondering, what are the differences between British highschools and American Highschools, if you know any. Like i said, just wondering. A Word Of Advice From A Beast: Don't Be Silly, Wrap Your Willy! 02:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, can you please advise on how this article should be written so as not to sound like an advertisement? Can you specify which parts of it are coming across to you as such? Please help, thank you! Leeshsters ( talk) 21:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm going to say this once, and clearly, since you appear to be a little hard of thinking.
Hun is not sectarian.
It is a term that refers to a Rangers fan, no matter what religion they may be. Unless 'Rangers Fan' has become a religion in recent days, then to suggest that Hun is sectarian is flat-out wrong. I will continue to edit the page to reflect this, because IT IS THE TRUTH. If you continue to mark such edits as 'vandalism', I will be left with no option but report you to your superiors. And if you genuinely believe that 'hun' is sectarian, might I suggest doing those of us with brains a favour and drinking a nice glass of bleach?
82.40.61.30 ( talk) 12:58, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I refer you to the case of Arkell vs Pressdram. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.61.30 ( talk) 13:17, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I question your action in removing reference to Chatteris tang soo do club. Surely any club that has been in existance for over 20 years deserves some notoriety?
Jack —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.237.81 ( talk) 23:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Article_Incubator/Melody_EP Gigs ( talk) 01:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
I like your approach to editing as evidenced by your user page and your edit summary when reverting vandalism at Eugenics. I'll just go ahead and call it vandalism, though I admire your willingness to think it may have been a mistake. If you check the IP's history of contributions, you'll find s/he has only vandalized. I don't know how to report her/him, but am letting you know.
The reason I like to see a few--not dozens!--of user boxes is because it helps me see the editor as a real live person, and helps me understand where they're coming from. I'm not suggesting you add any; your explanation as to why you don't fills that need. But then, when people stack 'em to the ceiling, that says something about them, too! I usually look at user pages before engaging with an editor. Best wishes, -- Yopienso ( talk) 01:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Response to your comment on my talk page. Also how do I view my userpage's deleted history? I'd prefer to get my userboxes back and not have to keep trying to find them on the userbox page. - BlagoCorzine2016 ( talk) 20:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Okay, okay, okay, okay! Maybe Miss Princess is NOT real, maybe she IS fake! Maybe stupid people TRICKED me, maybe that page was a hoax! Maybe that drawing wasn't Adam's! Maybe it was just a REALLY good immitation, or possibly even a recolor! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.179.139.215 ( talk) 05:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Would you mind telling me what business you have removing content from my personal user page? Answer over there. Kipala ( talk) 22:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Filed here. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 21:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that one of your comments has been included (and attributed to you) as part of my Nuggets of Wiki Wisdom . Thanks, and if you object then let me know :o) Redthoreau -- ( talk) 07:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
You said "I don't think they serve an essential purpose of identification as the thing they identify is listed alongside in word, but maybe they do have value as a secondary form of identification. I can see this one both ways. I would like to keep them but they are not essential." What did you mean by this? DReifGalaxyM31 ( talk) 19:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi I'm unsure what you meant by me doubling the size of False Prophet or pasting more than I meant to, I only added some references from the Quran as support and made it more concise to read.
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
profile
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'm not the one with the neutrality or currency regarding my POV. Besides, in terms of the British National Party, Stormfront, etc.; I can back up everything that I'm saying in terms of them being modern Nazi offshoots and organizations? Nickidewbear ( talk) 02:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Also, the mainstream and historians with a general consensus aren't always right; and if you use common sense, you'll know that socialism is on the left, not right, side of the political spectrum. Besides, I called the Nazi Party "not classifiable" on the political axis. So, if any one of us has the neutrality problem, it's more you than me. Nickidewbear ( talk) 05:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Daniel Bill was born in 1962 (21st March I think). Cant give you any formal citation for this but I was at primary and secondary school with him from 1967 to 1980
-- Rxw ( talk) 19:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
http://www.givemefootball.com/championship/jermaine-pennant-can-be-a-role-model-for-youngster - details his career, describes him as having a "colourful past" and role as probation officer and that he served time for armed robbery
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bH0CmX4maOQ - goal against Barnsley
http://www.soccerbase.com/players_details.sd?playerid=6039 - goal stats relating to season totals and evidence that he only played 43 games in 3 years at Orient before his move - hence the £100k fee for a reserve being suspicious.
The Cosenza player chasing him is folklore in Southend and common knowledge
I appreciate that the slight problem with cult heroes is where the line falls between unrefutable fact and knowledge of fans there at the time, however, all comments are honest and accurate as far as I know them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.214.195 ( talk) 20:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Any news on this and how I best go about updating the page?! —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
87.194.173.131 (
talk) 14:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
It's actually on the section. I needed assistance on the two articles. I thought I saved the message. The covert racism article seems to have gained the attention of some BNP supporters.
Nemogbr (
talk) 11:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
--
Nemogbr (
talk) 11:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Just a heads-up in case you feel the need to defend yourself against this silliness. Snied ( talk) 06:11, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on The Wimpy Kid Movie Diary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
i
B
e
n 00:51, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as The Wimpy Kid Movie Diary. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. i B e n 01:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Daniel, I have commented on the talk page of my entry. You are incorrect to state that the subject is covered in the main article as the question is not even mentioned. However I will accept your deletion of my Glasgow, Lanarkshire page on condition that you remove it completely, including the redirect. the effect of leaving the redirect in place is to reinforce the misapprehension that I am trying to remedy. it would be like redirecting Washington, Tyne and Wear to Washington DC.
Paul Coyne ( talk) 20:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
+ Daniel, how do I propose the redirect be deleted? Your point about London/Middlesex is exactly one of the points I make when correcting people. There very definitely is a need to state that Glasgow is not in Lanarkshire as it is frequently asserted to me that it is. About 50% of post sent to Glasgow is incorrectly addressed as a result of this ignorance. I don't see the same mistake being made wrt London, which is precisely my point. Paul Coyne ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC).
Hi, both edits are false. The initial intro page has been vandalized by user T22878. The actual intros tell that these 3 castes (more than 10% of the Tamil population) are of Tamil Royal lineage!!... The ref given are false, just playonwords (thevar, dewar are (respectable) words before being a caste name). These castes used to be soldiers of the kings and Land lords (please check the initial refs) and after the collapse of then ancient order some of them managed to found their little kingdoms (this was the initial intro of this wiki page, much more accurate). Thanks. 90.46.32.29 ( talk) 18:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks. I was actually leaving a note for the speedy-tagger, a conscientious and hard-working patroller, to explain my declining his tag. I'm grateful for your application of the stub tags, general clean-up and moving the article to its correctly-spelled title. If you have any ideas of a portal where this article could find someone to champion it further, I would be grateful; I think this has barely enough for retention, but needs work by someone interested in the topic. But thanks for your help. Accounting4Taste: talk 17:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Please, go make your voice heard in the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse scientific method! Rursus dixit. ( mbork3!) 14:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
To answer your question, it was my goof. When I saw that the first reference was for her age, I accidentally went to the external links section. That's where I got '77 from, the first link of the ext. links. Whether that link is considered reliable or not, I don't know. But I know that IMDb is not considered reliable for biographical info, so I've removed the date entirely. I don't have the time now to look into whether or not that first ext link, Eros-something, is reliable or not. I just know that IMDb isn't. If this is so contentious, then it should probably have a section on the talk page. If for no other reason than to help clarify for those who haven't done all the research and seen the manager's attempts to set back the clock. Dismas| (talk) 19:54, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting anonymous IP's repeated attempts to remove any reference to audience figures for children's programmes on Radio 7. I've tried starting a discussion to check out what the objection is but nobody answers so it becomes hard not to get involved in an editting war. With your revert it looks less like I'm some lonely maniac fighting against the sea. Alistair Stevenson ( talk) 13:31, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
The majority of people reading this article will be suffering from sinusitis or will know someone who is. Very few people, unless they are studying medicine, would choose to read up on a subject such as sinusitis. You are correct in stating that wikipedia is encyclopedic however that should not stop plain language being used and references being made to everyday products so that the average reader can better understand the concept (in this case natural nasal sprays). The word 'claim' has been used extensively with regards to natural nasal sprays so their is no bias. You state that the trials are laughable, which in effect means you think that the Institute of Asthma and Allergies in the U.S. is laughable. I can assure it is far from it and has helped many people - please try visiting their website. Why you seen fit to remove a section of this article which could be beneficial to peoples health is beyond me.
I look forward to your comments. P.s. I have undone your changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trump22 ( talk • contribs) 13:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I noticed your comment here about using (or misusing) Archive.org to push a point of view. Could you take a look here, and if you feel that you can form an opinion based on the evidence you see, help advise this dispute? - CRedit 1234 ( talk) 18:44, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Further, take a look at this, and think about what that means regarding saying a business was identified as having been "operating illegally", when not a single mainstream news source, or any public court record, seem to substantiate the exceptional claim. A few of us think two tag-teamers are trying to use Wikipedia to push a libelous claim, but I'd like an independent analysis. - CRedit 1234 ( talk) 18:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Its meant for our community alone if u belong to the community u can take part, its complicated to handle users like you please dont mistake me.The discussion about the kshatriyas is unwanted because Tamil is far superior and older than sanskrit and kshathriya is a sanskrit terminology for martial race and mukkulathor need not prove anything to so called "aryans" our community belong to southern region in India dont mix up with northerners our traditions and culture are different and yes THEVARS belong to the Great emperors of CHOLA, PANDYA, and CHERA dynasty. South region of india belongs to the KUMARI KANDAM(LEMURIAN CONTINENT),Where languages and culture born please refer to it. I'm sorry i'm not here to argue with you i want to tell the fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karikala thevar ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback, The people who discussed were not polite and the statements were harsh and the truth is been covered, moreover people don't have any idea and ignorant about the community and they can clarify the doubts but must not make irrelevant statement and that is the reason for removing unwanted topics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karikala thevar ( talk • contribs) 09:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, My request to move this to an article page has been denied because that title is blacklisted. I'm a bit unclear on how to request a controversial move. Any help? Bruce Swanson 23:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm not editing or removing anything how can u call vandalism?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.202.134.104 ( talk) 09:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC) I'm expecting ur answer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.202.134.104 ( talk) 09:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Do you own this wikipedia Mr.Daniel? I simply discussed in that page u r so rude and harsh anyways thanx for forigners contribution to Tamil people. I'm quiting this wiki and u'r taken in to notification once again thanx a lot.-- Be2bi ( talk) 20:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
There appears to be quite a bit of backlog for the CheckUsers on WP:SPI. Thankfully, the sockpuppet you have been monitoring is fairly easy to identify, even if his rapid edits are tedious to revert. Hopefully the backlog will clear soon. The upcoming elections might help matters, though the results of the elections are pretty far off in the future. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 00:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello Daniel,
I hope you are right, but good faith is hardly there when it comes to Chaldeans vs Assyrians. Assyrian Nationalists have been forcing the name "Assyrian" for a while. I just didn't know they were doing it in Wikipedia as well. Anyway, what I have removed from the article is simply the "Assyrianization" stuff that has no references to it. I had to clean this article from that nonsense. I believe that politics should not produce fault information. My intentions are solely for the correctness of this Wikipedia article.
Thanks -- King Of Babylonia ( talk) 11:13, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Daniel,
My name is Jonathan Horley and I have read your article on discount-licensing.com which you wrote a number of months ago. On the discussion page you asked if there were any other competitors or players in the market apart from Usedsoft. I founded discount-licensing.com along with Noel Unwin in 2005 and left the company 2 years ago. There are a number of articles from the November 2005 launch, of which this is one [1].
They can all be found by typing "Noel Unwin" "Jonathan Horley" into google. Last year I started Value Licensing which can be accessed at [2].
Given that I co-founded discount-licensing.com and I am have set-up Value Licensing in the same area, I believed it would be worth mentioning in the discount-licensing.com article. Even though I think that this information is appropriate to go into the article, I do however realise that if I wrote directly into the article this would be a clear conflict of interest. This is why I have come to you directly.
My suggested line in the article would read as follows under the Company history section incorporating the first line which is already there:
Updated below Jonhorley ( talk) 14:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
I apologise if the above is not in the correct format but this is the first one I have attempted!
Kind regards, Jonathan-- Jonhorley ( talk) 12:22, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
You previously expressed an opinon on this subject at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big data. There is a new debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big data (2nd nomination) and your comments would be welcome there. I42 ( talk) 05:28, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Last October, you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Its undeletion has now been requested here, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it and given Ms Lindman advice about references on her talk page. I am now notifying you in case you wish to take it to AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 20:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello Mr. DanielRigal. I have sent you an e-mail (through Wikipedia) about an article that caught my eye and the issues surrounding it. Thank you. IronBreww ( talk) 03:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Daniel.
Regarding this tennis match that has started to ensue over Mr Horley, we did not actually read the history and assumed My Horley was simply making the amendments himself - hence the deletions.
Mentioning other competitors does round off the Discount-Licensing.com article quite well and so we are not complaining about that – therefore, we are not opposed to including ‘Value Licensing’ as another competitor as creates some awareness that the market is growing, but surely mention it alongside other competitors in the next paragraph alongside Usedsoft who have been in the market much longer and are not working from home like Mr Horley is - it adds little credibility to this secondary market when the opening sentence refers to a tiny new competitor who’s website is hard to find via the web and incapable to demonstrating any sales/profit based on its most recent accounts. Note that there is another more longer term competitors that has been operating in the market from the start called 'Susensoftware' (also based in Germany) that you may want to include, - it also sells second hand SAP like ourselves. Note that there have been two other UK competitors that we are aware of, but both have since closed.
So, specifically regarding Mr Horley, we unfortunately cannot go into detail for legal reasons as to why he left, but we are simply concerned ongoing about having Mr Horley's name directly associated with Discount-Licensing.com in this way and I presume that the original objective of your article on Discount-Licensing.com was not to plug Mr Horley's new company, which is clearly what Mr Horley is trying to accomplish with his insertion the first sentence of this article.
I trust that this explains our position and that the article is amended back to where it originally was, including a mention of the other competitor companies later on, rather than plugging an 'ego' of a previous ex-employee of Discount-Licensing.com.
Regards, Noel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noel Unwin ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello Admin,
Anons, most probably just one person toying with different IPs, are keeping busy doing the "usual" with matching deceptive edit summaries. It may be best to protect the page from non-established users for the time-being, but it's whatever you deem best. Thank you! – Shannon Rose Talk 15:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
DanielRigal, I am inviting you to join the discussions here. The issues are similarly (but not 100%) related to IronBreww's lobbying above. Here is the link. I am trying to prove to the #1 Soriano critic (see the link) that the lead section of the Eliseo Soriano article is POV and more importantly, libelous. 180.191.66.131 ( talk) 03:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the picture to thumbnail and organizing the Categories.
I'm a total neophyte at this. JJBrannon ( talk) 04:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
I have one quick question for you. Why am I a sockpupeteer becasue I like to stand up for the rights of people whom have done nothing to you? The Classic Metal Show has had nothing to do with you, and yet you still said, and I quote, "This is not a article for inclusion in a serious encyclopedia." Well, good sir, I believe that you have awaken the sleeping giant. This is a crime, as the show has many loyal fans of which I am one of, as many more are. I respect your authority, but do not agree with the position that you have taken on The Clasic Metal Show article. I wish you much luck, and thank you for rewriting many articles for those who may use them and the valuble information that they hold. I especially like your section on the VNC protocol, which I use all of the time! Thank you, SlayerFan716 ( talk) 23:46, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Some US editors see the left-right spectrum as dictated solely by the extent of government control. The reasons for control are seen as irrelevant. Here is a link to a video that explains their viewpoint. Notice that this reverses the left and right at the time of the French revolution. The Fox News commentator Glen Beck actually wrote an introduction to Cleon Skousen's book and the John Birch Society co-sponsored the Conservative Political Action Conference this year. Here is a link to an article about Canada, where both British and American conservatism developed independently of each other. TFD ( talk) 11:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Daniel so sorry for misunderstanding. I don't have intention to Spam around or to remove something at Wiki for promoting Forum. I was only try to add some interesting information's and remove one my outdated post. Because of that I'm registered, it'll be logical to spam anonymous here...
One more time sorry for misunderstanding and my bad English.
Best Regards,
Samker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samker ( talk • contribs) 16:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey. About the Image its just small and not attractive or interesting at all and most importantly is used in other pages like Mount Judi .. you can check it out .. Its not attractive to keep a small fuzzy image in two articles why not change one .. The one I kept was in the Russian Wikipedia translation i think Moodswingster ( talk) 10:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Ok true but can you try to get another Jewish depiction because this one is used in other articles... Moodswingster ( talk) 03:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Did you really mean to blank the page? - [9]. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 23:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, My name is Philip Warner. Sir Mark Wienberg, who worked with Professor Jim Gower in creating the shape of the Financials Services Act in the early 80's, wrote to me in the early 90's saying "I can understand what you trying to say. I just hope others can too" He then set about depolarising the sales system that he had put together. Resulting in depolarisation. Sir Mark had been the Chairman of MIBOC the Marketing of Investment Boards Organising Committee and was largely responsible for putting polarisation on the map in the first place. My view is not cynical. It is steeped in philosophy and requires depth of thought. I was an IFA in the 80's and often wrote for Financial Times Business Information. I quit the industry altogether after putting forward the philosophy that undermined the system. These days I am a happy .com multimillionaire. You can't hold a good man down as they say. Regards Phil Warner 62.56.106.232 ( talk) 16:09, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your efforts, but please be careful not to inadvertently bit newcomers with your deletion tagging- if the content is not blatantly inappropriate, there's usually no harm in leaving it for a few hours to see what, if anything, the author does with it before sticking a PROD tag on it, which may frighten them off. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
... for clearing the nastiness from my User page. Much appreciated. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 18:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
That's OK, nothing bad happened ;) Kubek15 write/ sign 11:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Nice to "meet" you over at the Talk:Frixion page where we were discussing notability. :) Pianotech ( talk) 23:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
What I said WAS true LOOK at these videos! http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=r9Ik-FT4bh8&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=asb2apgceSU&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=4Hf5HyGqwnM&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=Wc3SGTeo_RU&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=GUAEKcTIt64&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=M4ewhMMWGSE&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=X2FK-tq7i6U&feature=related —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.179.164.81 ( talk) 13:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, was wondering if you could lend a third opinion to the inclusion of content Here (again I know). Just a third opinion on the inclusion of arguably notable enough material. Thanks Monkeymanman ( talk) 19:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Is it possible to submit article for a revison by editor before publishing ie. avoid multiple edits Baukadm ( talk) 18:30, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Yes a new article, the reason is that original article is edited/reverted by you, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Baukadm Maybe it would be simpler to submit article to you for revision before it is published, and not have multiple edits Baukadm ( talk) 19:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Also is there a way to contact you by email? Baukadm ( talk) 19:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Howdy, Can you anyway provide your email for contact,
maybe you can provide information ie. that is not available
in your reply.
Baukadm (
talk) 18:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Daniel, This article is not up to any standard. Lot of the information is not accurately presented. Is verbose encyclopedic ?? Also what is the deal on references, when references are origional opinions of other people anyway. You should let my version stand and let the people/sikhs decide if it fits their understanding of the religion. Please revert it back. However I was anyway planning to make it "encyclopedic" but you removed it. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.28.137.229 ( talk) 17:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Daniel. I am just about at the end of my patience with AzureFury. I am about to give him a third notice to restore the lede written by the editors who voted to keep the article. As I explained at Talk:Defamation_of_religions_and_the_ United_Nations#Lead_section, his lede is unacceptable because it is not a summary of Defamation of religions and the UN; AzureFury's lede is a shoddy summary of an editorial by Canada.com's Hui Min Neo combined with the opinions of Bennett Graham and AzureFury. If you prefer my lede, I request that you ask AzureFury to restore it. If you believe AzureFury's lede is tolerable, please tell me why. Thank you for defending the article. PYRRHON talk 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Discount-licensing.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
-- mitchsurp -- (
talk) 22:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, thanks for the contact. Stumbeling at my first attempts on wiki The current page on the Airmans Letter was entirely focussed on the film. Perhaps you are right about merging it with the existing entry I have his CO's copies of uk and usa editions of the book with newspaper clippings and a note from the airman's mother, hence the photo's . What do you suggest is the appropriate action ?
kind regards david David raines ( talk) 22:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the speedy deletion from this recently-created article as it doesn't appear to meet A7: it asserts notability, stating that the website has conducted interviews with numerous notable artists, which is sufficient to pass the CSD. If you feel that the article may not meet the GNG, please take it to AfD; since the article's only just been created, it's possible that further sourcing will reveal that it is able to meet WP:GNG. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 20:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) I just reverted a rather massive insertion of what looked like harrassing religious propaganda into your talk page since it appeared to be pure vandalism; let me know if I was incorrect to do so and I'll avoid doing so again next time. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 10:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Why do you want to delete Hare Krishna portal??? Today on holy day of Ekadashi??? Usually only demons or big sinners do this... Are you one of them??? Actually delete atheism portal instead. Yes, do this... I can help you —Preceding unsigned comment added by HareKrishnaPortal ( talk • contribs) 17:06, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
That was a really tl;dr rant on the MFD. Wanna tone it down some? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Otters want attention) 18:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
In the article macaroni casserole you were right, it is minced meat. Thank you for changing it and thank you for writing it in a nice way (sometimes some Wikipedians can be quite nasty) :-) Leopea ( talk) 11:26, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello DanielRigal, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ezida TV, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I'm finding plenty of non-wiki references to Ezida TV and relationship to Kurdistan TV - redirect appears to make sense ATM. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am a contributor to the New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company page, and noticed that you had placed several tags on the page using "Friendly." These tags included the fact that it needed more sources and notability, the fact that it read like an advertisement, and that there was suspicion of a conflict of interest. Several changes have been made since the page was fist created. Can you take a look at it again, and notify me if any more changes need to be made for those tags to taken down? Any thoughts and concerns would be appreciated.
Thanks, Helpfulhand ( talk) 14:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
I added a list of the subpages associated with this portal to the deletion discussion. I suppose others should comment on whether they think those should be deleted as well. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 13:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
This IP is the third that has a similar pattern of vandalism. The previous two are 80.42.235.17 and 80.42.227.142, both of which were blocked at one point. -- Skywatcher68 ( talk) 20:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I have undone your edit of redirecting it to Hindu units of measurement as the current article covers much more than Hindu units of measurement. It also wrongly claims the Vedas elaborate on details of Hindu cosmology like the mention of the lokas such Patala, which are not found in the Vedas, but in the later Puranas. I am not sure from where "Number of species of birds" etc. is derived.-- Redtigerxyz Talk 12:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Material was removed because it was unsourced or poorly sourced, if you add material back to that article ensure that it is based on a Reliable source. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 15:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
And I'll remove it - don't add material to BLPs with tags, either source it or don't bother. -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 15:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
For now it has to stay - no it doesn't. Core policy is that unsourced material can be removed at any time. Do not readded unless you have RS. --
Cameron Scott (
talk) 16:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Is Marxism not Anarchy and Communism? -- 76.19.74.59 ( talk) 05:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, regarding page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catherine_Hanley Please give me chance to finish the page, I was editing it to put references in and you made changes before I got chance to save the page creating an edit conflict.. I am totally new to Wikipedia so it is taking me a little time to get the page correctly formatted - Thanks BJM76 ( talk) 21:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your advice and help! I will try and make the required format changes over the next day or so, best wishes
BJM76 (
talk) 21:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Daniel,
Please can you tell me why you have such an aversion to the suggested improvements on the fish fingers page?
If I had a pound every time someone from Grimsby claimed that they hail form the birthplace of the fish finger I would be a very wealthy man.
I think highlighting the widespread misunderstanding can only add to the accuracy and interest of the page.
I await your comments with interest.
Mr Fish Oracle —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fish oracle ( talk • contribs) 15:27, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
It has nothing to do with local rivaly. I think that accuracy is paramount however you seem to be operating a questionable degree of censorship that worries me.
If I were researching fish fingers I would want to know about the common misconception. Your refusal to add it merely promotes ignorance where processed fish is concerned.
I urge you to reconsider your decision.
Mr Fish Oracle
Daniel
Many thanks for your informative and generally well researched piece on fishfingers.
Unfortunately i feel you are factually inaccurate on their true origin. Along with frozen prawns and scampi the birthplace of the popular fish based snack is Great Grimsby in North East England.
Whilst this may seem a trivial matter to many, my grandfather was responsible for this pioneering work in food processing and therefore your factual inaccuracies are a cause for significant upset for my family. I look forward to an amended piece.
regards
Trevor Findus —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.49.193.107 ( talk) 15:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Concur with your assessment; I've soft-blocked the Ip for three months, and will follow up with an e-mail to the school. That was a little over the line from 'school boy nonsense'. Kuru (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page Vrenator ( talk) 08:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
Sorry to bother you in the midst of new page patrolling but I see from your homepage that you live in Guildford and are interested in trains.
I was wondering if there's any way to get a cheap ticket between London and Guildford on SWT (or anyone else for that matter)? Whenever I search, the return fare seems to come in at £13 or more which seems pretty steep for what is not a very long journey. Thanks — Amakuru ( talk) 23:06, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
Regarding your removal of Nikki Haley from the list of notable Sikhs at the Sikh article, I understand your reluctance to allow a professed convert to Methodism to remain in a list of Sikhs, but I thought I'd explain why I thought Haley qualified as a notable entry in this list. However, I won't add her name back to the list myself; I'll leave it to you to decide whether that's appropriate.
According to her article, Haley was born and raised as a Sikh; she has stated that she converted to Methodism shortly before marrying, but she still attends both Sikh and Methodist services. Her unique religious background (unique among American politicians, I mean) may well be one of the most remarkable aspects of her career, given the bias and hostility in U.S. politics against politicians with non-Christian backgrounds. She is certainly notable from the perspective of Sikh culture: her political career may represent one of the greatest inroads Sikhism has made into U.S. politics thus far. Which doesn't say much for tolerance in U.S. politics, but my point is that it makes her Sikh background rather noteworthy from a Sikh perspective.
Anyway, that was my rationale; it's up to you if you want to re-add her name. AtticusX ( talk) 08:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Just to let you know, one of your recent truncated comments has made by "Wiki Words of Wisdom". :o) Redthoreau -- ( talk) 08:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, user user:Dharani Maran is continuously removing the originial research tag from the Paravar page whereas there are many doubtful claims, misinterpretation of sources... Claims such as Kshatriya, Pandya royal lineage are pure POV. Many sources have been provided in the discussion page concerning the origins of the Paravar caste. None of them I have been taken into account. This user is also threatening other editors (see talk page)who do not share his POV. Please check and do something. Thank you. 83.202.208.125 ( talk) 18:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please readd the tags removed by this user. He has no right to remove these tags whereas his claims of Aristocratic/Kshatriya/ Pandya royal lineage are not sourced by proper refs. For ex, have a look on the ref 'Caste and tribes of southern India', the author, Edgar Thruston, never tell that the Paravars are Kshatriyas or from Pandya lineage but only that they claim these... This is clearly manipulation, original research!... Please readd the tags and ask for page complete protection. Thank you. 83.202.208.125 ( talk) 17:43, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
-- The Big Garage Fan ( talk) 12:29, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
you guys are weirdly quick -- and don't look at the talkback for specific pages. The page was deleted by HJ WHILE I was correcting it, so the hangon tag was for THAT page. If you guys could coordinate, maybe my hour of unsaved work about a great theatre company wouldn't be pulled in the 5 minutes between getting the flag notice and it getting pulled. Sheesh -- Kevjkelly ( talk) 01:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:School and university projects. DGG ( talk ) 02:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
The need for disambiguation was not so much to do with trains or states that might have trains but to do with South West. There was a discussion on the use of the name South East Region. The end result was that it need to be renamed to South-East Region, Ireland. The ruling was that countries ought to be separated by comma while other entities ought to be separated by parentheses. Since "Train" is integral to the name of the company, then the name "South East (trains)" would be silly. Nevertheless, the title is too generic not to have a country delimiter. Who knows, another country might pop up some day with their own South East trains. Laurel Lodged ( talk) 12:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Im just wondering, what are the differences between British highschools and American Highschools, if you know any. Like i said, just wondering. A Word Of Advice From A Beast: Don't Be Silly, Wrap Your Willy! 02:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello, can you please advise on how this article should be written so as not to sound like an advertisement? Can you specify which parts of it are coming across to you as such? Please help, thank you! Leeshsters ( talk) 21:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm going to say this once, and clearly, since you appear to be a little hard of thinking.
Hun is not sectarian.
It is a term that refers to a Rangers fan, no matter what religion they may be. Unless 'Rangers Fan' has become a religion in recent days, then to suggest that Hun is sectarian is flat-out wrong. I will continue to edit the page to reflect this, because IT IS THE TRUTH. If you continue to mark such edits as 'vandalism', I will be left with no option but report you to your superiors. And if you genuinely believe that 'hun' is sectarian, might I suggest doing those of us with brains a favour and drinking a nice glass of bleach?
82.40.61.30 ( talk) 12:58, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I refer you to the case of Arkell vs Pressdram. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.61.30 ( talk) 13:17, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I question your action in removing reference to Chatteris tang soo do club. Surely any club that has been in existance for over 20 years deserves some notoriety?
Jack —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.237.81 ( talk) 23:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia_talk:Article_Incubator/Melody_EP Gigs ( talk) 01:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
I like your approach to editing as evidenced by your user page and your edit summary when reverting vandalism at Eugenics. I'll just go ahead and call it vandalism, though I admire your willingness to think it may have been a mistake. If you check the IP's history of contributions, you'll find s/he has only vandalized. I don't know how to report her/him, but am letting you know.
The reason I like to see a few--not dozens!--of user boxes is because it helps me see the editor as a real live person, and helps me understand where they're coming from. I'm not suggesting you add any; your explanation as to why you don't fills that need. But then, when people stack 'em to the ceiling, that says something about them, too! I usually look at user pages before engaging with an editor. Best wishes, -- Yopienso ( talk) 01:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Response to your comment on my talk page. Also how do I view my userpage's deleted history? I'd prefer to get my userboxes back and not have to keep trying to find them on the userbox page. - BlagoCorzine2016 ( talk) 20:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Okay, okay, okay, okay! Maybe Miss Princess is NOT real, maybe she IS fake! Maybe stupid people TRICKED me, maybe that page was a hoax! Maybe that drawing wasn't Adam's! Maybe it was just a REALLY good immitation, or possibly even a recolor! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.179.139.215 ( talk) 05:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Would you mind telling me what business you have removing content from my personal user page? Answer over there. Kipala ( talk) 22:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Filed here. Cheers,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► (
(⊕)) 21:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that one of your comments has been included (and attributed to you) as part of my Nuggets of Wiki Wisdom . Thanks, and if you object then let me know :o) Redthoreau -- ( talk) 07:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
You said "I don't think they serve an essential purpose of identification as the thing they identify is listed alongside in word, but maybe they do have value as a secondary form of identification. I can see this one both ways. I would like to keep them but they are not essential." What did you mean by this? DReifGalaxyM31 ( talk) 19:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi I'm unsure what you meant by me doubling the size of False Prophet or pasting more than I meant to, I only added some references from the Quran as support and made it more concise to read.
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
profile
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).