![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi, Cyphoidbomb,
Maybe you don't see a talk page message with a title like this one every day, but I do appreciate a revert with a rationale. I am wondering, in the article Baahubali: The Beginning, whether the term "bilingual" is exactly fitting in its current context in the article lede. Having reviewed the sources, I see a description of a production process in which a Telugu-language story was expanded into a Telugu-language script, and then a Tamil-language screenwriter was hired to produce a Tamil-language script which was apparently use to film many scenes directly in Tamil during production, simultaneously with filming scenes in Telugu. But the movie as a viewer watches it (I have watched it) is in one language or another,[note] so the movie as such isn't "bilingual" from the viewers point of view. ([note] Yeah, the movie includes the made-up language of the invading group, which in fact was made-up by the Tamil-speaking screenwriter and used in all released versions of the movie, but since that language is just made up, that probably isn't what is intended by "bilingual" in the movie description.) Digging into the sources cited in the article, I saw a statement from one of the lead actors that the close-up scenes were often specially shot to facilitate dubbing with better lip-synching for the Hindi version, so couldn't the article just as legitimately say "triligual" in that same place? And of course just about all the sources agree in saying that on release day the movie was released in versions in Telugu, Tamil, Malaylam, and Hindi (all languages in which I have watched movies from India in the town where I live), so couldn't the movie also be described as "quadrilingual"? Of course one way to fix this problem is to have no adjective in that part of the lede (as you saw was my intention) but to expand the body of the article with full citation of what the sources say about the development of the movie in different languages. But, yeah, this gets to be very contentious in articles about Indian cinema, which you have evidently worked on more than I have. (Aside: thanks for raising the question about "nett gross" on another editor's talk page, as that phrase was puzzling to me too.) Anyway, I just offer for your consideration the thought that I wouldn't want to slight any language that was anticipated as a release language by the film producers as they released the film. But maybe there is a better way to surface all of those details in the lede than has yet been tried by the several editors working diligently on the article. Thanks for the detailed rationale for your edit; see you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 00:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
"People please give due credit to Telugu and stop being cheap and taking the credit for the work that has nothing to do with Tamil ... I never thought Tamil will stoop to this level of taking credit for someone else film."This sentiment was echoed by Aloosamosa,
"Please change the First line in the main section as Indian Telugu Epic film . That would give due credit to the telugu people who worked for this film for almost 3 years."This user also argued,
"The numbers speak for themselves what language the film belongs to. 60% of total revenues came from telugu states."Well, maybe the Tamil people didn't go see the movie because they too are caught up in this ethnic pride ridiculousness? Anyhow, these are clearly POV arguments and we have to be very cautious to avoid POV content. I also don't see what value is provided by arguing about what the film "primarily" is. The film Avatar was produced in standard film format along with a variety of 3D formats. Does that mean that the film was "primarily" a standard film? A 3D film? Who knows, and who cares? What we do know definitively, regardless of emotion, is that there were different formats. Two nations were involved in the production of that film. Are we going to split hairs over which one was "primarily" the harder working nation? Foreign gross totals for the film were almost 3x more than the domestic take—are we going to claim that the film was "primarily" intended for an overseas audience? No, we go with what the references say. The pro-Telugu editors seem to be cherrypicking references that lack any mention of Tamil, as proof that Telugu is the official language. This is logically fallacious, because they are using a lack of information to draw a conclusion about what the film must not be. Just because sources A, B and C don't say something, doesn't mean that source D is incorrect when they do say something. If an article didn't mention that Avatar was produced in a standard format, would that mean that the 3D format was the "primary" format? Of course not. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
What makes you think you are WP:INVOLVED? Is the master blocked? Are you reasonably sure the IP is a sock per WP:DUCK? -- NeilN talk to me 20:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, since you recently became an admin and you suspect Roronoa Ace of sockpuppetry, is it possible for admins to run a checkuser on accounts? If not, this should be taken to SPI. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 21:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurcharan Singh Bhikhi (Sidki); since you brought this up at WT:INB. cheers. — Spaceman Spiff 12:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I totally missed it--congratulations. A close call, and some wise words in the closing statement, but congratulations. By now you will have discovered that it's a lot less fun than it seemed before, though that powertrip can be a great high. (For instance, you can now revdel this from your talk page: feels good!) Listen, if you ever need to know anything, if you're ever in doubt, if there's ever a task that needs to be done but you just can't be bothered to do it or to learn how to do it, don't hesitate, and call on Dennis Brown or Kelapstick immediately. They'll be glad to help. All the best, Drmies ( talk) 14:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
In India, We have
Entertainment tax charged by states on films. It varies from state to state. Some states like Rajasthan dont have Entertainment tax, while Tamil nadu doesnt take Entertainment tax on any film having Tamil name.
Gross in India= Nett. Gross+
Entertainment tax
What we see in the film collection reports is Nett. Gross after deducting the
Entertainment tax .
But the most important for a film is Distributor share of the film.
Distributor share= Nett. Gross - Theatre rentals
Distributor share varies with each week and region in India. it will be more in first week,then lesser in second week etc.--
Conradjagan (
talk)
17:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Why was it reverted back to the previous one? The Merrie Melodies article still mentions the one-off 1988 revival, so why can't the Looney Tunes article mention the 1987 to present revival? Also, the last pre-revival Looney Tunes short ended in 1969, not 1970. 24.180.56.157 ( talk) 14:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
In highest grossing list talk page i have mentioned support but no one is responding. Support for Telugu was more than that of support for telugu and tamil then why are u not removing baahubali from the tamil list Padukati raju ( talk) 05:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Damn, you discovered my secret! I didn't come up with the colours listed on my user page. They were originally added to List of Arthur episodes with this edit. speaking of my user page, I'm trying not to let the discussion stagnate, as so many TV discussions seem to. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 20:04, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "
Talk:Balochistan#Recent_changes".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
EdwardH
(
talk)
12:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Please delete my profile. This website is too confusing and discouraging for me to be an editor. I will be moving on.
Rainynites ( talk) 02:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Rainynites
Your edit summary that I made an "unexplained change" is demonstrably false. I corrected incorrect information in the article (the movie takes place five years after Banner's first transformation, not five months, it says so in the movie, as well as in sources), and changed "158 days" to "five months" because it was too specific. Thank you. Spaghetti07205 ( talk) 01:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
On your recent revert from my edit on The Loud House, I used an Instagram comment for verification because it was said by the show's creator. Not to be mad or anything, but I believe that if the creator of the work said that information, it has to be canon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kartoonkid95 ( talk • contribs) 05:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
How foolish are you? The goddamn series has never even been in the 2015-2016 upfront of Cartoon Network and you're still sucking up to the usual "there needs to be a source to confirm this". Seriously guy, hop off my back and save the empty threats of blocking me. Also, how come you didn't revert the same thing at the List of The Tom and Jerry Show (2014 TV series) episodes? Oh wait, let me guess... JoesphBarbaro ( talk) 21:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I see your warning at Internet 7000, he or she has added the same thing again at Winslet's article, which I have removed again. Just wanted to update you on the matter. regards-- Jockzain ( talk) 08:56, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about the refactoring there. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 22:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
If you are talking about the names of the characters, there links have been added since we don't know what species some of the animal characters are since I don't know what type of pigs, goats, or crikets that the three characters are. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 21:45, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
I need to request that Tickety Toc is protected immediately because multiple IP addresses posted photos of two people doing something inappropriate which has been reverted. 99.53.112.186 ( talk) 04:19, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Did you just recently become an admin or have you been an admin this whole time and I just wasn't aware of it? If the former, congratulations! Amaury ( talk) 04:17, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
As it seems you are online, could you possibly help out with my question on another talk page? The admin I asked asked another admin, however he hasn't come online. Leeds United FC fan ( talk) 21:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
(UTC)
Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.11.240 ( talk) 22:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
If we reach a consensus in favor of the inclusion of future programming sections, I would like an indefinite block or topic ban for TRPoD on grounds of WP:CIVIL and WP:DISRUPTIVE. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 17:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
The languages you have warned such as "phenomenal success","blockbuster" have also been used in many other wikipidia pages. We are using languages only reffering other wiki pages,and that pages are still existing,and the many reverted content were with credible news sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Refined devil ( talk • contribs)
This pertains to broadcast networks and how they announce the broadcast dates of a series? Can we use tweets by verified twitter accounts or Facebook pages as a valid references? If a tweet were to say "Series <X> to premier on <some date> at <some time>", would that be considered a reputable source? Similar case applies to posts by the Facebook page admins as well. Would the actual schedule on the official website itself be considered as reputable sources? I apologize if they come across as stupid questions, but as a newbie editor just starting out, I thought it was better to ask. Manoflogan ( talk) 20:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I have closed your request for adminship as successful. Congratulations on the positive result; however, while your request was a pass, there was significant opposition based on your article work, temperament and the copyvio incident - the last in that list being an honest mistake in an otherwise good anti-copyvio record. With regards to temperament, that issue arose over some of your comments within your RfA but the context and your track record of being a friendly/collaborative editor were both noted, too; still, I do recommend exercising greater care with your interactions now that you are an administrator. Nothing would make the opposition happier than proving them wrong.
Now that my "lecture" is out of the way, as always, the administrators' reading list is worth reading and the new admin school is most certainly available if you feel that you might require some practice with the tools in a safe environment prior to applying them elsewhere on the project. Congratulations also on your entry into WP:RFX100. Good luck with your adminship! Acalamari 05:46, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Anyway, enough of that. My talkpage is always open if you have questions or concerns about anything, or if you need checkuser to help deal with a troll. Congratulations on passing RFA! Cheers! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 15:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations on the successful result, now you are an admin do good for our community. -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 09:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: Congrats! Well deserved. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 21:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RFA! Allow me to impart the words of wisdom I received eight long, sordid years ago from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
Ha, that's great, KrakatoaKatie, thanks for the sage advice. :) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, Congratulations! I was not aware of your adminship otherwise I would have !Voted for you. Best wishes. Audit Guy ( talk) 02:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to say thank you for furthering my (meagre) efforts to have a centralised discussion about future programming sections. You were correct in assuming I was talking about the Zee Zindagi page, and the discussion seemed like it picked up steam after that. Sunny Sundae Smile ( talk) 01:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
I happened to visit List_of_programs_broadcast_by_HBO and saw the section missing. I went to other similar articles and saw the sections were being wiped out unilaterally with no attempt to build consensus beforehand. It reminded me of a similar situation on the MMA articles (3 years ago), where one dissenting opinion was cause for wiping half of the project. The bureaucracy over common sense approach last time soured me to the process for a while. I went about finding consensus on the MMA project in all the wrong ways, and was unnecessarily aggressive. I suppose I started in similarly poor fashion this time too (although one might argue I merely followed the precedent being set for me by an overzealous experienced editor). I'm trying to be more sensible this time. The MMA issue was eventually resolved, and I'm confident this one will be too. It's all been a lot more encouraging my previous spell editing here. Also my interest in how the page for Zee Zindagi should be laid out isn't as sudden as you might think. I've been watching Zee TV for more than twenty years. Zindagi has some really good Pakistani TV series. I'm also a fan of Geo TV and ARY Digital, if you wanted to know! Anyway, I appreciate the help and hope my explanation suggest that my edits are in good faith, even if my activity patterns seem odd! Best, Sunny Sundae Smile ( talk) 10:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
On the one hand, a change cannot be made to an article unless there is a consensus of opinion among editors of the article. On the other hand, if "the opposing party" Oh, say Zmaghndstakun for example, "have not explained why/what part of the material (which the supporting party added)" beyond "WP:NPOV and WP:COATRACK", then ... what? that overrides the need for consensus? Their objection is WP:Edit warring? Do you know off hand? Should I ask village pump? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 14:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Oh, and also thanks for all the work you've done on this Balouchistan problem. -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 14:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey Cyphoid. I have a task for you if you'd be so gracious to help. Please move Draft:Star Wars Anthology: Rogue One to the main space at Star Wars Anthology: Rogue One, as filming has begun allowing a mainspace article per WP:NFF. Once that has completed, please look over the contents of Star Wars Anthology – Rogue One, which I think was a cut-and-paste move of the draft, and if you think it was, can you merge any edits of that to the moved-draft article (the one with the ':'). Thanks! - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 14:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
BackyardigansKaibigan ( talk) 21:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
T.U.F.F. Puppy is ended, not current, according to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. That means you should NOT change it to a current series.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.23.15 ( talk • contribs)
I know I was putting down unreliable facts in the SpongeBob Season 9 page, but I'm kinda new to editing Wikipedia, and I don't really know how to use the referencing codes very well. But as you can see here: https://twitter.com/VincentWaller72/status/631458565669019648 it was confirmed that the writers for "The Executive Treatment" and "Squid Plus One" were what you saw in the tweet. So, do you think you could re-add the writer's names that I put and add the references as well? Or at least tell me the code I have to put in on there? Thanks for understanding and I'm sorry for my mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lego Spongy ( talk • contribs) 22:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for fixing his name on the wikipedia page.
Akon also confirmed his 12 names in an interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3skzeuRWNiQ
Perhaps you could also reference the video in the article, so people don't come along and delete it in the future? (I don't have the ability to edit the page)
Thanks again for your time.
Cheers 81.151.4.136 ( talk) 14:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't like to abuse WP:AIV with issues that are not clear cases of vandalism, but I'm disappointed in the lack of attention paid to my post at WP:ANI (the link to the specific section "The barrelling editor from IP 72.229.40.94" isn't working for some reason). Can I ask you to take a look? I came short of asking for a block, demurring to an administrator's consideration, but maybe I should be bold here and suggest that the IP address be blocked from contributing for a while, to get things back on track again. Willondon ( talk) 13:04, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi sir, The sock puppet which you last arrested by the names of maria0333, rashidzaman & others. whose propagandist and wrong map is going to be deleted in a few days. So, he has started his nasty works again by Hashimachakzai, AlluArjunTollywood (disguising himself as indian) and other users names again and through IP (39.47.86.140 &) editing, thus changes the reality of articles. While after your nomination of his fake map for deletion, he uploaded this one thumbnail|New designed copy of the nominated fake & wrong map which is also that map but changed in design. So, a strict watch on this vandal must be performed. Thanx -- Adilswati ( talk) 04:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Cyphoidbomb. Can you keep an eye on this one: User:185.94.31.96. He has been making "unconstructive" edits to a series of American college football articles, altering coach Bret Bielema's name to "Bert" and "Fat Bert" everywhere he can find it. I have already left him a gentle warning on his talk page. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 20:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Regards, Yamaguchi先生 20:50, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello? I've got a problem. The Pingu episode list articles have been unjustly deleted for no reason; some think they're OR. I really would appreciate those articles being recreated and protected from OR edits. Visokor ( talk) 19:45, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
And another thing, there's another article I think needs a lot of attention: The Magician of Samarkand. That article's all skin and bones, if you know what I mean. Visokor ( talk) 10:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
You said in your edit summary that "jungle" in "Venezuelan jungle" should not be capitalized. According to Google, the word "jungle" in Venezuelan Jungle IS capitalized (see https://www.google.ca/#q=Venezuelan+Jungle). My question is, if Venezuelan Jungle is the name of a jungle, shouldn't the word jungle be capitalized? Claudia Kishi ( talk) 17:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, you're right. I thought it meant the title of the place - it was just talking about the jungle in Venezuelan. Claudia Kishi ( talk) 18:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
It's in no way promotional. The stats are from the only two law ranking publications in Canada. Please check my citations and elaborate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Overleveraged1 ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Regards, Sofffie7 ( talk) 18:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
While the Muppet vandal is annoying, you may want to tone down the "numbskull" stuff—you are an admin, after all. :) Trivialist ( talk) 23:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for the input Denniskerala ( talk) 16:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC) |
See what you think of this. A bit similar to the Baluchistan kerfuffle. Do you think I should go ahead with a formal RfC on the dispute? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 17:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for taking notice and saving me the trouble of taking the matter to ANI. Levdr1lp / talk 02:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello there I need some help, I moved the category Category:Wikipedia categories named after cities in the United States, I was just trying to make the category more inclusive and it won't let me move it back. -- ACase0000 ( talk) 12:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Do you agree with TheRedPenOfDoom's sentiments that the subject of the article is not notable? I tried to tell him not to change the page to a mere redirect without first seeking consensus, only for him to say that consensus does not override WP:GNG. Just wanted to ask this. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 02:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
You said you would appreciate advice ... I would not have requested a CU on this SPI. Saying you're "curious" doesn't really justify a CU, and in my view you had no real reason to suspect other accounts. The behavior was obvious. I would have just tagged the two accounts on your own without even opening an SPI. As you can see, I ran the CU anyway, but that's just because I like you. :-) -- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:52, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Okay, sir please I promised for Wikipedia's policies, So some admins blocked users such as HenryWalken, I'm really sorry for vandalism.[9]. My concern was, they're drawing attention to the fact that they've used more than one account, so I wondered if there's more than two out there. Dat's all. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering if you could please block Kylebulger. I have recently spent much time and effort into improving the Moose and Zee page, yet this user has repeatedly edited the page to include his own name as the creator of the show, claim that the series is being "revived," add nonexistent segments hosted by himself to the "Recurring segments" section, and so forth. Not a single edit he has made includes a source. I reviewed all of Kylebulger's edits, and each one has been vandalism (normally including some misspelled words). Thank you for your time! -- Squiddaddy ( talk) 14:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Funny how you always ask me for sources but when an idiot wrote that Regular show airs on CN Arabic , you never reverted his edits , anyways , i don't give a damn about this article anymore , have fun keeping your little article up to date . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.118.44.217 ( talk) 23:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Take a good look at what all those random IP addresses have been doing to that article. Neither you nor User:Visokor did jack about it. Instead you blocked me for 2 whole weeks and there are a ton of TV show/movie articles that need a good cleanup, to which I believe that neither of you are aware of. I wish you was never an admin. Save all the threats of banning me forever and ever, guy. JosephBarbaro over and out. JoesphBarbaro ( talk) 22:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I did not know that the template ref had been deprecated. Thanks for correcting my mistake. This is in relation to context https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zindagi_TV&type=revision&diff=677258223&oldid=677257847 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manoflogan ( talk • contribs) 04:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angelina Ballerina: The Next Steps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emma Tate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi I put the edit on the Premam page for the voice of George's (Nivin Pauly) mother. It's quite hard to find a proper reference because Indian movies credit their people in a different way. However in the actual movie they thank Rajini Chandy for giving her voice. She is credited in the actual movie. AlexJosephT ( talk) 19:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for post that should be shown as fine example of how to talk with newbies :) Krzysiu ( talk) 02:49, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Piper and Olivia are dating. Source of information here: https://instagram.com/p/6dZVPAsoKY/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:ca:8400:9380:902b:e39c:fde7:e7d5 ( talk • contribs)
small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.230.11 ( talk) 01:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm told that not all of my pings went through, so this is to inform you that your name has been cited on a list of Wikieditors who hold the opinion that the MoS should not explicitly state that animate pronouns are standard for fictional characters. If this is not correct, please feel free to remove or alter the entry. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 03:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, how are you? Sorry to bother you, but I saw your revert of Wonderwizard's mention on The Exit List page about the ranking 8f the programme on the Ukgameshow.com website. I do think tht this source and fact is not a notable inclusion by Wikipedia standards. It is a fan based opinion poll and is not a recognisd website. Unfortunately in looking at his recent edits these past few days, I noticed that he is including a mention of the very same poll on every gameshow Wikipedia page mentioned. I was just wondering if you agree and if you can possibly do something about it. Thanks in advance. 66.130.12.185 ( talk)samusek2 —Preceding undated comment added 15:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
I just came back to ask one thing. Is it alright if I could add to that article by writing that reruns had aired regularly on CN from 2004 through 2011? Or no (because of the usual source thing...)? I've seen CTCD aired reruns regularly at early Saturday morning at 4 AM or 4:30 AM during the City era of CN. Then around 2007-2011, reruns have aired regularly at 10 pm (Monday-Thursday) or 1-2pm (Saturday & Sunday). Yes, the Cartoon Cartoon Show and Cartoon Planet aired reruns of the CTCD too. JoesphBarbaro ( talk) 12:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you so much for your assistance! It's a bit early for a beer, but some days can be exceptions to the 5:00 rule - CHEERS! Scr★pIron IV 15:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Cyphoidbomb. You recently blocked User:Peter Phillip Charles Leoni, but I'm wondering if User:Stacy Gunn should also be blocked as a sockpuppet? I'm not sure if there is enough evidence for a block per WP:DUCK. -- Drm310 ( talk) 16:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Would you be so kind as to take a peek at my user and talk pages? I'd rather have things dealt with quietly, and avoid running around AIV, or AN/I, SPI, or whichever of the boards is required. I will defer to your judgement. It may be inappropriate to ask directly, and if it is, please just let me know, and I will do the correct thing. Thanks! Scr★pIron IV 14:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I know you said you added a bot to auto-archive stuff on the VZW talk page, but it missed a few sections.
Can you manually archive these?
There are 2 other sections I didn't list because they are still less than 6 months old.
Thanks, Myriad Pro ( talk) 13:10, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Since only admins can edit it right now, any chance you could revert this? Looks like it sneaked in there. First episode is not a two-parter and the other problematic edits were reintroduced. Amaury ( talk) 20:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Would you consider returning the article to the the status quo state it was in before the edit war began? Geraldo Perez ( talk) 20:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: Here's your reminder! I've also re-added the S2 episodes. Hopefully it's not a problem as that wasn't the issue as mentioned. :) Amaury ( talk) 21:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
I can't even find a single piece of evidence that confirms that "Old Man Dexter" and "Dumb Like Dee Dee/Dimwit Dexter" have also aired as pilots prior to the regular series, which is why I reverted them. JoesphBarbaro ( talk) 17:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me about the policy regarding IMDb; I have seen it used as a reference on other pages and will make sure to fix those articles. I do have one question, though: why did you remove the part about Uniqua being the only character to appear in every episode? It is true; I can provide a different reference if that is why you removed it. Thanks again, -- Squiddaddy ( talk) 03:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your message and I only just wanted to apologize me about the info I added yesterday. I did have any intention to violate Wikipedia rules about adding new data. Do you know how could I added it again in the right way? Sorry by to do it wrong... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chockys ( talk • contribs) 20:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
It's been a few weeks, but we're in for some more fun times. Old revision of Talk:International Christian Church Jerod Lycett ( talk) 02:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Per your advice, after they again introduced their problematic edits on Friday night, making the article even less compliant again, I left the article alone for the time being and messaged them about it here. In the morning, Nyuszika7H had reverted them. Now, once again, just a little less than a couple hours ago, they re-introduced their problematic edits, so I reverted them, as they have once again failed to at least bring it up on the talk page. Amaury ( talk) 03:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Hi, Cyphoidbomb,
Maybe you don't see a talk page message with a title like this one every day, but I do appreciate a revert with a rationale. I am wondering, in the article Baahubali: The Beginning, whether the term "bilingual" is exactly fitting in its current context in the article lede. Having reviewed the sources, I see a description of a production process in which a Telugu-language story was expanded into a Telugu-language script, and then a Tamil-language screenwriter was hired to produce a Tamil-language script which was apparently use to film many scenes directly in Tamil during production, simultaneously with filming scenes in Telugu. But the movie as a viewer watches it (I have watched it) is in one language or another,[note] so the movie as such isn't "bilingual" from the viewers point of view. ([note] Yeah, the movie includes the made-up language of the invading group, which in fact was made-up by the Tamil-speaking screenwriter and used in all released versions of the movie, but since that language is just made up, that probably isn't what is intended by "bilingual" in the movie description.) Digging into the sources cited in the article, I saw a statement from one of the lead actors that the close-up scenes were often specially shot to facilitate dubbing with better lip-synching for the Hindi version, so couldn't the article just as legitimately say "triligual" in that same place? And of course just about all the sources agree in saying that on release day the movie was released in versions in Telugu, Tamil, Malaylam, and Hindi (all languages in which I have watched movies from India in the town where I live), so couldn't the movie also be described as "quadrilingual"? Of course one way to fix this problem is to have no adjective in that part of the lede (as you saw was my intention) but to expand the body of the article with full citation of what the sources say about the development of the movie in different languages. But, yeah, this gets to be very contentious in articles about Indian cinema, which you have evidently worked on more than I have. (Aside: thanks for raising the question about "nett gross" on another editor's talk page, as that phrase was puzzling to me too.) Anyway, I just offer for your consideration the thought that I wouldn't want to slight any language that was anticipated as a release language by the film producers as they released the film. But maybe there is a better way to surface all of those details in the lede than has yet been tried by the several editors working diligently on the article. Thanks for the detailed rationale for your edit; see you on the wiki. -- WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 00:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
"People please give due credit to Telugu and stop being cheap and taking the credit for the work that has nothing to do with Tamil ... I never thought Tamil will stoop to this level of taking credit for someone else film."This sentiment was echoed by Aloosamosa,
"Please change the First line in the main section as Indian Telugu Epic film . That would give due credit to the telugu people who worked for this film for almost 3 years."This user also argued,
"The numbers speak for themselves what language the film belongs to. 60% of total revenues came from telugu states."Well, maybe the Tamil people didn't go see the movie because they too are caught up in this ethnic pride ridiculousness? Anyhow, these are clearly POV arguments and we have to be very cautious to avoid POV content. I also don't see what value is provided by arguing about what the film "primarily" is. The film Avatar was produced in standard film format along with a variety of 3D formats. Does that mean that the film was "primarily" a standard film? A 3D film? Who knows, and who cares? What we do know definitively, regardless of emotion, is that there were different formats. Two nations were involved in the production of that film. Are we going to split hairs over which one was "primarily" the harder working nation? Foreign gross totals for the film were almost 3x more than the domestic take—are we going to claim that the film was "primarily" intended for an overseas audience? No, we go with what the references say. The pro-Telugu editors seem to be cherrypicking references that lack any mention of Tamil, as proof that Telugu is the official language. This is logically fallacious, because they are using a lack of information to draw a conclusion about what the film must not be. Just because sources A, B and C don't say something, doesn't mean that source D is incorrect when they do say something. If an article didn't mention that Avatar was produced in a standard format, would that mean that the 3D format was the "primary" format? Of course not. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 15:07, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
What makes you think you are WP:INVOLVED? Is the master blocked? Are you reasonably sure the IP is a sock per WP:DUCK? -- NeilN talk to me 20:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, since you recently became an admin and you suspect Roronoa Ace of sockpuppetry, is it possible for admins to run a checkuser on accounts? If not, this should be taken to SPI. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 21:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurcharan Singh Bhikhi (Sidki); since you brought this up at WT:INB. cheers. — Spaceman Spiff 12:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I totally missed it--congratulations. A close call, and some wise words in the closing statement, but congratulations. By now you will have discovered that it's a lot less fun than it seemed before, though that powertrip can be a great high. (For instance, you can now revdel this from your talk page: feels good!) Listen, if you ever need to know anything, if you're ever in doubt, if there's ever a task that needs to be done but you just can't be bothered to do it or to learn how to do it, don't hesitate, and call on Dennis Brown or Kelapstick immediately. They'll be glad to help. All the best, Drmies ( talk) 14:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
In India, We have
Entertainment tax charged by states on films. It varies from state to state. Some states like Rajasthan dont have Entertainment tax, while Tamil nadu doesnt take Entertainment tax on any film having Tamil name.
Gross in India= Nett. Gross+
Entertainment tax
What we see in the film collection reports is Nett. Gross after deducting the
Entertainment tax .
But the most important for a film is Distributor share of the film.
Distributor share= Nett. Gross - Theatre rentals
Distributor share varies with each week and region in India. it will be more in first week,then lesser in second week etc.--
Conradjagan (
talk)
17:41, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Why was it reverted back to the previous one? The Merrie Melodies article still mentions the one-off 1988 revival, so why can't the Looney Tunes article mention the 1987 to present revival? Also, the last pre-revival Looney Tunes short ended in 1969, not 1970. 24.180.56.157 ( talk) 14:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
In highest grossing list talk page i have mentioned support but no one is responding. Support for Telugu was more than that of support for telugu and tamil then why are u not removing baahubali from the tamil list Padukati raju ( talk) 05:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Damn, you discovered my secret! I didn't come up with the colours listed on my user page. They were originally added to List of Arthur episodes with this edit. speaking of my user page, I'm trying not to let the discussion stagnate, as so many TV discussions seem to. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 20:04, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "
Talk:Balochistan#Recent_changes".
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
EdwardH
(
talk)
12:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Please delete my profile. This website is too confusing and discouraging for me to be an editor. I will be moving on.
Rainynites ( talk) 02:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Rainynites
Your edit summary that I made an "unexplained change" is demonstrably false. I corrected incorrect information in the article (the movie takes place five years after Banner's first transformation, not five months, it says so in the movie, as well as in sources), and changed "158 days" to "five months" because it was too specific. Thank you. Spaghetti07205 ( talk) 01:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
On your recent revert from my edit on The Loud House, I used an Instagram comment for verification because it was said by the show's creator. Not to be mad or anything, but I believe that if the creator of the work said that information, it has to be canon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kartoonkid95 ( talk • contribs) 05:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
How foolish are you? The goddamn series has never even been in the 2015-2016 upfront of Cartoon Network and you're still sucking up to the usual "there needs to be a source to confirm this". Seriously guy, hop off my back and save the empty threats of blocking me. Also, how come you didn't revert the same thing at the List of The Tom and Jerry Show (2014 TV series) episodes? Oh wait, let me guess... JoesphBarbaro ( talk) 21:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I see your warning at Internet 7000, he or she has added the same thing again at Winslet's article, which I have removed again. Just wanted to update you on the matter. regards-- Jockzain ( talk) 08:56, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about the refactoring there. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 22:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
If you are talking about the names of the characters, there links have been added since we don't know what species some of the animal characters are since I don't know what type of pigs, goats, or crikets that the three characters are. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 21:45, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
I need to request that Tickety Toc is protected immediately because multiple IP addresses posted photos of two people doing something inappropriate which has been reverted. 99.53.112.186 ( talk) 04:19, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Did you just recently become an admin or have you been an admin this whole time and I just wasn't aware of it? If the former, congratulations! Amaury ( talk) 04:17, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
As it seems you are online, could you possibly help out with my question on another talk page? The admin I asked asked another admin, however he hasn't come online. Leeds United FC fan ( talk) 21:21, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
(UTC)
Sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.11.240 ( talk) 22:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
If we reach a consensus in favor of the inclusion of future programming sections, I would like an indefinite block or topic ban for TRPoD on grounds of WP:CIVIL and WP:DISRUPTIVE. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 17:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
The languages you have warned such as "phenomenal success","blockbuster" have also been used in many other wikipidia pages. We are using languages only reffering other wiki pages,and that pages are still existing,and the many reverted content were with credible news sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Refined devil ( talk • contribs)
This pertains to broadcast networks and how they announce the broadcast dates of a series? Can we use tweets by verified twitter accounts or Facebook pages as a valid references? If a tweet were to say "Series <X> to premier on <some date> at <some time>", would that be considered a reputable source? Similar case applies to posts by the Facebook page admins as well. Would the actual schedule on the official website itself be considered as reputable sources? I apologize if they come across as stupid questions, but as a newbie editor just starting out, I thought it was better to ask. Manoflogan ( talk) 20:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I have closed your request for adminship as successful. Congratulations on the positive result; however, while your request was a pass, there was significant opposition based on your article work, temperament and the copyvio incident - the last in that list being an honest mistake in an otherwise good anti-copyvio record. With regards to temperament, that issue arose over some of your comments within your RfA but the context and your track record of being a friendly/collaborative editor were both noted, too; still, I do recommend exercising greater care with your interactions now that you are an administrator. Nothing would make the opposition happier than proving them wrong.
Now that my "lecture" is out of the way, as always, the administrators' reading list is worth reading and the new admin school is most certainly available if you feel that you might require some practice with the tools in a safe environment prior to applying them elsewhere on the project. Congratulations also on your entry into WP:RFX100. Good luck with your adminship! Acalamari 05:46, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Anyway, enough of that. My talkpage is always open if you have questions or concerns about anything, or if you need checkuser to help deal with a troll. Congratulations on passing RFA! Cheers! Reaper Eternal ( talk) 15:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations on the successful result, now you are an admin do good for our community. -- EurovisionNim (talk to me) (see my edits) 09:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: Congrats! Well deserved. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 21:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RFA! Allow me to impart the words of wisdom I received eight long, sordid years ago from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
Ha, that's great, KrakatoaKatie, thanks for the sage advice. :) Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 22:02, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, Congratulations! I was not aware of your adminship otherwise I would have !Voted for you. Best wishes. Audit Guy ( talk) 02:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to say thank you for furthering my (meagre) efforts to have a centralised discussion about future programming sections. You were correct in assuming I was talking about the Zee Zindagi page, and the discussion seemed like it picked up steam after that. Sunny Sundae Smile ( talk) 01:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
I happened to visit List_of_programs_broadcast_by_HBO and saw the section missing. I went to other similar articles and saw the sections were being wiped out unilaterally with no attempt to build consensus beforehand. It reminded me of a similar situation on the MMA articles (3 years ago), where one dissenting opinion was cause for wiping half of the project. The bureaucracy over common sense approach last time soured me to the process for a while. I went about finding consensus on the MMA project in all the wrong ways, and was unnecessarily aggressive. I suppose I started in similarly poor fashion this time too (although one might argue I merely followed the precedent being set for me by an overzealous experienced editor). I'm trying to be more sensible this time. The MMA issue was eventually resolved, and I'm confident this one will be too. It's all been a lot more encouraging my previous spell editing here. Also my interest in how the page for Zee Zindagi should be laid out isn't as sudden as you might think. I've been watching Zee TV for more than twenty years. Zindagi has some really good Pakistani TV series. I'm also a fan of Geo TV and ARY Digital, if you wanted to know! Anyway, I appreciate the help and hope my explanation suggest that my edits are in good faith, even if my activity patterns seem odd! Best, Sunny Sundae Smile ( talk) 10:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
On the one hand, a change cannot be made to an article unless there is a consensus of opinion among editors of the article. On the other hand, if "the opposing party" Oh, say Zmaghndstakun for example, "have not explained why/what part of the material (which the supporting party added)" beyond "WP:NPOV and WP:COATRACK", then ... what? that overrides the need for consensus? Their objection is WP:Edit warring? Do you know off hand? Should I ask village pump? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 14:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Oh, and also thanks for all the work you've done on this Balouchistan problem. -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 14:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey Cyphoid. I have a task for you if you'd be so gracious to help. Please move Draft:Star Wars Anthology: Rogue One to the main space at Star Wars Anthology: Rogue One, as filming has begun allowing a mainspace article per WP:NFF. Once that has completed, please look over the contents of Star Wars Anthology – Rogue One, which I think was a cut-and-paste move of the draft, and if you think it was, can you merge any edits of that to the moved-draft article (the one with the ':'). Thanks! - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 14:57, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
BackyardigansKaibigan ( talk) 21:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
T.U.F.F. Puppy is ended, not current, according to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. That means you should NOT change it to a current series.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.23.15 ( talk • contribs)
I know I was putting down unreliable facts in the SpongeBob Season 9 page, but I'm kinda new to editing Wikipedia, and I don't really know how to use the referencing codes very well. But as you can see here: https://twitter.com/VincentWaller72/status/631458565669019648 it was confirmed that the writers for "The Executive Treatment" and "Squid Plus One" were what you saw in the tweet. So, do you think you could re-add the writer's names that I put and add the references as well? Or at least tell me the code I have to put in on there? Thanks for understanding and I'm sorry for my mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lego Spongy ( talk • contribs) 22:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for fixing his name on the wikipedia page.
Akon also confirmed his 12 names in an interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3skzeuRWNiQ
Perhaps you could also reference the video in the article, so people don't come along and delete it in the future? (I don't have the ability to edit the page)
Thanks again for your time.
Cheers 81.151.4.136 ( talk) 14:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't like to abuse WP:AIV with issues that are not clear cases of vandalism, but I'm disappointed in the lack of attention paid to my post at WP:ANI (the link to the specific section "The barrelling editor from IP 72.229.40.94" isn't working for some reason). Can I ask you to take a look? I came short of asking for a block, demurring to an administrator's consideration, but maybe I should be bold here and suggest that the IP address be blocked from contributing for a while, to get things back on track again. Willondon ( talk) 13:04, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi sir, The sock puppet which you last arrested by the names of maria0333, rashidzaman & others. whose propagandist and wrong map is going to be deleted in a few days. So, he has started his nasty works again by Hashimachakzai, AlluArjunTollywood (disguising himself as indian) and other users names again and through IP (39.47.86.140 &) editing, thus changes the reality of articles. While after your nomination of his fake map for deletion, he uploaded this one thumbnail|New designed copy of the nominated fake & wrong map which is also that map but changed in design. So, a strict watch on this vandal must be performed. Thanx -- Adilswati ( talk) 04:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Cyphoidbomb. Can you keep an eye on this one: User:185.94.31.96. He has been making "unconstructive" edits to a series of American college football articles, altering coach Bret Bielema's name to "Bert" and "Fat Bert" everywhere he can find it. I have already left him a gentle warning on his talk page. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 20:30, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Regards, Yamaguchi先生 20:50, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello? I've got a problem. The Pingu episode list articles have been unjustly deleted for no reason; some think they're OR. I really would appreciate those articles being recreated and protected from OR edits. Visokor ( talk) 19:45, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
And another thing, there's another article I think needs a lot of attention: The Magician of Samarkand. That article's all skin and bones, if you know what I mean. Visokor ( talk) 10:53, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
You said in your edit summary that "jungle" in "Venezuelan jungle" should not be capitalized. According to Google, the word "jungle" in Venezuelan Jungle IS capitalized (see https://www.google.ca/#q=Venezuelan+Jungle). My question is, if Venezuelan Jungle is the name of a jungle, shouldn't the word jungle be capitalized? Claudia Kishi ( talk) 17:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, you're right. I thought it meant the title of the place - it was just talking about the jungle in Venezuelan. Claudia Kishi ( talk) 18:09, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
It's in no way promotional. The stats are from the only two law ranking publications in Canada. Please check my citations and elaborate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Overleveraged1 ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Regards, Sofffie7 ( talk) 18:52, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
While the Muppet vandal is annoying, you may want to tone down the "numbskull" stuff—you are an admin, after all. :) Trivialist ( talk) 23:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for the input Denniskerala ( talk) 16:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC) |
See what you think of this. A bit similar to the Baluchistan kerfuffle. Do you think I should go ahead with a formal RfC on the dispute? -- BoogaLouie ( talk) 17:52, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for taking notice and saving me the trouble of taking the matter to ANI. Levdr1lp / talk 02:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello there I need some help, I moved the category Category:Wikipedia categories named after cities in the United States, I was just trying to make the category more inclusive and it won't let me move it back. -- ACase0000 ( talk) 12:43, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Do you agree with TheRedPenOfDoom's sentiments that the subject of the article is not notable? I tried to tell him not to change the page to a mere redirect without first seeking consensus, only for him to say that consensus does not override WP:GNG. Just wanted to ask this. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 02:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
You said you would appreciate advice ... I would not have requested a CU on this SPI. Saying you're "curious" doesn't really justify a CU, and in my view you had no real reason to suspect other accounts. The behavior was obvious. I would have just tagged the two accounts on your own without even opening an SPI. As you can see, I ran the CU anyway, but that's just because I like you. :-) -- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:52, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Okay, sir please I promised for Wikipedia's policies, So some admins blocked users such as HenryWalken, I'm really sorry for vandalism.[9]. My concern was, they're drawing attention to the fact that they've used more than one account, so I wondered if there's more than two out there. Dat's all. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:32, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering if you could please block Kylebulger. I have recently spent much time and effort into improving the Moose and Zee page, yet this user has repeatedly edited the page to include his own name as the creator of the show, claim that the series is being "revived," add nonexistent segments hosted by himself to the "Recurring segments" section, and so forth. Not a single edit he has made includes a source. I reviewed all of Kylebulger's edits, and each one has been vandalism (normally including some misspelled words). Thank you for your time! -- Squiddaddy ( talk) 14:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Funny how you always ask me for sources but when an idiot wrote that Regular show airs on CN Arabic , you never reverted his edits , anyways , i don't give a damn about this article anymore , have fun keeping your little article up to date . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.118.44.217 ( talk) 23:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Take a good look at what all those random IP addresses have been doing to that article. Neither you nor User:Visokor did jack about it. Instead you blocked me for 2 whole weeks and there are a ton of TV show/movie articles that need a good cleanup, to which I believe that neither of you are aware of. I wish you was never an admin. Save all the threats of banning me forever and ever, guy. JosephBarbaro over and out. JoesphBarbaro ( talk) 22:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I did not know that the template ref had been deprecated. Thanks for correcting my mistake. This is in relation to context https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_Zindagi_TV&type=revision&diff=677258223&oldid=677257847 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manoflogan ( talk • contribs) 04:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Angelina Ballerina: The Next Steps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emma Tate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi I put the edit on the Premam page for the voice of George's (Nivin Pauly) mother. It's quite hard to find a proper reference because Indian movies credit their people in a different way. However in the actual movie they thank Rajini Chandy for giving her voice. She is credited in the actual movie. AlexJosephT ( talk) 19:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for post that should be shown as fine example of how to talk with newbies :) Krzysiu ( talk) 02:49, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Piper and Olivia are dating. Source of information here: https://instagram.com/p/6dZVPAsoKY/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:ca:8400:9380:902b:e39c:fde7:e7d5 ( talk • contribs)
small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.230.11 ( talk) 01:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm told that not all of my pings went through, so this is to inform you that your name has been cited on a list of Wikieditors who hold the opinion that the MoS should not explicitly state that animate pronouns are standard for fictional characters. If this is not correct, please feel free to remove or alter the entry. Darkfrog24 ( talk) 03:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, how are you? Sorry to bother you, but I saw your revert of Wonderwizard's mention on The Exit List page about the ranking 8f the programme on the Ukgameshow.com website. I do think tht this source and fact is not a notable inclusion by Wikipedia standards. It is a fan based opinion poll and is not a recognisd website. Unfortunately in looking at his recent edits these past few days, I noticed that he is including a mention of the very same poll on every gameshow Wikipedia page mentioned. I was just wondering if you agree and if you can possibly do something about it. Thanks in advance. 66.130.12.185 ( talk)samusek2 —Preceding undated comment added 15:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
I just came back to ask one thing. Is it alright if I could add to that article by writing that reruns had aired regularly on CN from 2004 through 2011? Or no (because of the usual source thing...)? I've seen CTCD aired reruns regularly at early Saturday morning at 4 AM or 4:30 AM during the City era of CN. Then around 2007-2011, reruns have aired regularly at 10 pm (Monday-Thursday) or 1-2pm (Saturday & Sunday). Yes, the Cartoon Cartoon Show and Cartoon Planet aired reruns of the CTCD too. JoesphBarbaro ( talk) 12:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you so much for your assistance! It's a bit early for a beer, but some days can be exceptions to the 5:00 rule - CHEERS! Scr★pIron IV 15:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Cyphoidbomb. You recently blocked User:Peter Phillip Charles Leoni, but I'm wondering if User:Stacy Gunn should also be blocked as a sockpuppet? I'm not sure if there is enough evidence for a block per WP:DUCK. -- Drm310 ( talk) 16:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Would you be so kind as to take a peek at my user and talk pages? I'd rather have things dealt with quietly, and avoid running around AIV, or AN/I, SPI, or whichever of the boards is required. I will defer to your judgement. It may be inappropriate to ask directly, and if it is, please just let me know, and I will do the correct thing. Thanks! Scr★pIron IV 14:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I know you said you added a bot to auto-archive stuff on the VZW talk page, but it missed a few sections.
Can you manually archive these?
There are 2 other sections I didn't list because they are still less than 6 months old.
Thanks, Myriad Pro ( talk) 13:10, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Since only admins can edit it right now, any chance you could revert this? Looks like it sneaked in there. First episode is not a two-parter and the other problematic edits were reintroduced. Amaury ( talk) 20:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Would you consider returning the article to the the status quo state it was in before the edit war began? Geraldo Perez ( talk) 20:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
@ Cyphoidbomb: Here's your reminder! I've also re-added the S2 episodes. Hopefully it's not a problem as that wasn't the issue as mentioned. :) Amaury ( talk) 21:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
I can't even find a single piece of evidence that confirms that "Old Man Dexter" and "Dumb Like Dee Dee/Dimwit Dexter" have also aired as pilots prior to the regular series, which is why I reverted them. JoesphBarbaro ( talk) 17:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me about the policy regarding IMDb; I have seen it used as a reference on other pages and will make sure to fix those articles. I do have one question, though: why did you remove the part about Uniqua being the only character to appear in every episode? It is true; I can provide a different reference if that is why you removed it. Thanks again, -- Squiddaddy ( talk) 03:10, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I saw your message and I only just wanted to apologize me about the info I added yesterday. I did have any intention to violate Wikipedia rules about adding new data. Do you know how could I added it again in the right way? Sorry by to do it wrong... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chockys ( talk • contribs) 20:19, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
It's been a few weeks, but we're in for some more fun times. Old revision of Talk:International Christian Church Jerod Lycett ( talk) 02:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Per your advice, after they again introduced their problematic edits on Friday night, making the article even less compliant again, I left the article alone for the time being and messaged them about it here. In the morning, Nyuszika7H had reverted them. Now, once again, just a little less than a couple hours ago, they re-introduced their problematic edits, so I reverted them, as they have once again failed to at least bring it up on the talk page. Amaury ( talk) 03:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)