![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
I think you know me from the issue about the Jimmy Two-Shoes article. I'm very glad writing to you again. The problem is I'm editing this article according to data I've gathered and I've cited through the article, and this user is disrupting my edits, which is a fault on the first Wikipedia rule: "Anyone can edit". Now, I understand that I'm being silly about this, but I have sources which can prove my point on this edit, being reverted [1] [2] [3] [4] repetitively. I'm not basing the articles with my facts. I've made a research on different forums and I've been looking for webs which had the information I needed, but this user is persistent on this and doesn't want the changes to be added. For the record, this is the same user that time ago tried to manipulate the Main article of the channel from being US localized to International, something many users, including administrators, rejected. Please, help me. He has a long time being here, and I'm just one year and still learning, but I'm not rude with everybody here. Hope you understand. Sincerely. - Bankster1 ( talk) 00:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Edit: Also, we both violated the 3RR rule, but I rejected to revert his edition due to position he may do to prove him right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bankster1 ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Bankster1 ( talk) 03:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Could you please add Alex Russo to your watchlist? An unresponsive editor keeps unnecessarily adding colour to the infobox. He's veen reverted at other articles but for some reason keeps targeting this one with some poor contrast colours and a polite request hasn't helped. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 16:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I am in the process of rewriting the page, and I currently plan not to "go live" until I have your feedback unless you take too long to respond. How would you suggest that I put the content into a less fan-oriented way while having the same info in it? -- Super3588 ( talk) 19:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
So I'm starting to suspect some widespread socking and long term abuse on cartoon articles... there's just too many folks trying to change genres. Just seems too common to be a coincidence. Curious what you thought. Pinging Geraldo Perez as well since they also deal with these edits. Am I just being paranoid? EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 01:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
It's Australian (in case you were curious). -- kelapstick( bainuu) 00:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for putting a block on 173.50.64.195. We had lots of vandalism on List of programs broadcast by Qubo. This person undone the edits that I have corrected earlier today. I spent 20 minutes correcting and removing false information s/he did. Right now, it is originally back the way s/he put it as if this person thinks the information s/he found was true. We do not where or how s/he got the information. We definitely sure it is false. Unfortunately, I cannot revert it due to the person who re-corrected the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbears22 ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for replying back. 173.50.64.195 has been driving me nuts and probably s/he is putting false information on the page. Therefore, I requested a page protection for the List of programs broadcast by Qubo page for vandalism and putting future tv shows in which it has not happened yet. I just found out that Ged UK has already requested to semi-protect the programming page. Cbears22 ( talk) 01:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
What a shame. I looked at the editing times/days of the Finealt socks and there is no overlap with edits by Dcbanners. At least not for the past 5 weeks. SMH. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey Cyphoidbomb. As you know, I'm a frequent editor of the article List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network. My question is: what will it take to get the article up to GA status, and what do you think is the "ideal" list of TV shows article? Should it be simplified to look like List of programs broadcast by CBS? Should the tables with distributors, premiere/end dates, notes, refs, etc. go and be replaced with the old list format?-- Phil A. Fry ( talk) 00:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Where do you come from?
Malmsimp ( talk) 20:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
You reverted my edit on the page Courage the Cowardly Dog regarding Nowhere. Have you seen the intro? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtMLRQtCblw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepspace9odo ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Haha. >:( — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Deepspace9odo (
talk •
contribs)
07:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I had to report you to ANI for harassment. The sources I used on the Kip Mckean page are reliable sources.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Cyphoidbomb_keeps_harassing_my_edits_and_reporting_me._He_is_using_reporting_as_a_weapon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qewr4231 ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For your willingness to politely discuss contentious issues, and your exemplary efforts in reducing fancruft from Hindi film articles. Krimuk|90 ( talk) 03:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC) |
A "friend" of yours appears to have moved to List of Jessie episodes. [5] [6] -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 17:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
List of Clarence episodes. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in
loss of editing privileges. Diff:
[7] Your edits here appear look an awful lot like intentional disruption. The content you added is not found in the sources you attributed.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
00:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate you reflecting on the incident, giving Saginaw-hitchhiker an apology, and fixing the url. Well done for that. I looked into this incident because it's highly unusual for a user who has 30 Good Articles under their belt to indulge in vandalism. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 16:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Just noting, in case you're keeping track, that 107.1.219.46 just added a stealthy vandalism to the YGG! Eps list. RossO ( talk) 16:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb. I did not create that article. I was excited to see something written about me. I added the picture. I'm not a professional 'wikieditior'... I didn't log in all the time. Wgolf had the band pages deleted, then added the article for deletion on Craig Walendziak after I tried to TALK with him on his talk page. It just makes me sick to my stomach. That article is more factual then 75% of the stuff on here... but I have to defend it because Wgolf is CAMPAIGNING for his friends to get it deleted.
I'm new here... not malicious.
C Craig mack378 ( talk)
Thanks.
C
Is my editing really that sloppy? :'-( Norozco1 ( talk) 09:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
No issues with your reverts. I did a quick check though and Calendar Girls has a release date of August 7, 2015 so I moved it there. The other movie being removed is more complicated. Hungama gives the release date only as 2015. I didn't dig into any of the other sources or search for anything more definite than that. *shrug* - not really sure what to do on that one. Ravensfire ( talk) 18:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Currently it's unreliable. Only one user PallaviSave is adding it and she even tried to create a cinechicken page. It would be better if you remove any material citing Cinechicken. -- C E ( talk) 10:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm wondering why you took out what you did. If you look on your website, you can properly see that this is a real thing, in the form of a press release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrishl ( talk • contribs) 16:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
How dare you say it's dubious of me to say my husband of twenty-five years passed away. I just wanted you guys to know because he loved editing this site and though some of his editing buddies could send condolences. At least one editor knew it was right. Shame on you. (
Mrs. Meltdown (
talk)
21:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC))
And get off your high horse. TheDethklokGuy ( talk) 03:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Now that the character list content is moved to the main page (although still in comments), is it time to nuke the page? AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 00:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I accept motherlandmagazine source but , now are you going to prove this is also reliable?
http://www.darkmoon.in/mrx-review
which becomes
http://blog.darkmoon.in/bollywood-horror/mr-x-film-review/
-- C E ( talk) 15:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
You recently participated in a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Archive 20#Presenters' years in infobox. Subsequent to this discussion, an RfC has been opened at Talk:Top Gear (2002 TV series)#RfC: Should years be included in the infobox, in which you may be interested in participating. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 14:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoid. I'm not sure why, but whenever I pull up the contributions for an IPv6, the letters in the ID are always displayed in CAPS, so that's how I copy-paste them into the list at User:Cyphoidbomb/Marhc Vandal. However, currently on that page, many of the entries show those same addresses with the letters in lowercase. This makes it somewhat difficult to see which IPs have already been listed. Apparently, I am not the only one who has experienced this; you just entered one identical to the one right above it. Only it was vice-versa, adding lowercase with caps version already existing. Where are you getting the lowercase form? -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 22:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
For info, in the unlikely chance that you miss it: Special:Contributions/194.81.223.1. Best, — SMALL JIM 12:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Why did you undone my edit? We don't know who Timmy married at the end of Channel Chasers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JerrySa1 ( talk • contribs) 21:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
18:58, 25 March 2015 Cyphoidbomb (talk | contribs) . . (59,819 bytes) (-3) . . (Undid revision 653492284 by Yoshams (talk) Unsourced and questionable. Regular typists can type that fast.)
Regarding the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_captioning under the section "Technical development of closed captioning", third paragraph, the number you revised the edit to (225) is unrealistic. The highest WPM recorded is 212. Could you possibly provide a source for where you got that number? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.64.220.178 ( talk) 12:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I see you removed my reference at the ICC page "saying that is not how we cite books" and that is wasn't appropriate, care to expand? JamieBrown2011 ( talk) 13:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Confirming your first opinion and decided to revert you on Movies on this one; at least with NAM there was some polishing of the writing before they threw up their 'best network ever' spin; this is all just completely unchecked press releases that are so unattributed that I'm surprised that Viacom's lawyers haven't slammed it off the web yet. If I see this, I'm reverting, plain and simple. Nate • ( chatter) 05:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Mr. Teatime references the Death family motto in Hogfather (it was also mentioned in the TV adaptation). [1]
N1ckFG ( talk) 01:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I just got your message about the Nicktoons edit (I was off the internet lol) It's all good I'll fix the errors if there's any left but yeah don't worry about it. TheUpdates ( talk) 03:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Our buddy has been busy today. Hope you don't mind, but I have made several changes to your vandal page on him. Feel free to tweak, correct, add to, or revert any of my changes as you see fit. Thanks. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 00:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
All my edits are sourced stop undoing them
first All upcoming series were confirmed either by CN Arabia itself or the dubbing studio
second The list of programs currently broadcast , is outdated it's from March , I updated it to correspond the May schedule same thing for the reruns
Then we have the minor edits i did Tasali in arabic تسالي is written with ي not ى or else it will be read tasala other thing , Chowder , Camp lazlo , dexter's lab and Powerpuff girls are CN Originals and not aquired series , you need a source for that ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaiserNeko ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello! My source is at the end of each Metacritic credits page, for example let's take this one from Unfriended here. At the end of the page, it states that "Movie title data, credits, and poster art provided by: IMDb". Genre and all information on the page are duplicated from IMDb here. This goes for all the films on the site. Ditto for the film I edited (Big Hero 6): here and here Andrzejbanas ( talk) 18:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
How can you refute the IP's unsourced additions when none of the existing content is sourced? — MusikAnimal talk 16:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I have approved your request. Please wait until an admin can come to take care of this. Electrified Man Attacks! ( Face my wrath!) 11:48, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Just cuz I feel like it.
Electrified Man Attacks! (
Face my wrath!)
11:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Kind of poor form to assume that I removed that piece of information because I didn't like it, isn't it? I genuinely thought it was useless/superseded information that didn't add to anyone's knowledge of the film, but I did look at a number of another of other film pages and it looks like Metacritic is very commonly cited. (Although for what it's worth I didn't find any movies citing information aggregated from as few as six reviews!).
I.e., I admit to making a procedural error, but you certainly weren't very friendly/reasonable about it (attributing a primary motive other than the legitimate one I mentioned in my edit). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbutler3331 ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Who says an 11 word statement can't involve editorializing? I think it's pretty clear that you were suggesting that I removed the information (mostly/entirely) because I didn't like it. You could have done the proper thing and just pointed out why the material belonged in the article. Instead, you chose to make it personal (about my motives).
You happen to be right - I was a little taken aback that the article could indicate that the critical consensus involved "Overwhelming dislike" based on just six reviews (when most movies on the site that cite Metacritic have dozens, and one of the reviews was even quoted on Metacritic as saying "Ban this sick filth." Really, that's legitimate criticism?), but it seemed like a totally legitimate edit to make considering the aforementioned facts and the additional redundancy involved since these reviews were included as part of the larger Rotten Tomatoes sample. You've pointed out why I was wrong with these assumptions, at least per Wiki policy, and I admit error there (I have only edited very sporadically over the years), but that still doesn't excuse your (twice, now) impugning my motives for removing the information.
Ignore whatever you want; it's your prerogative (I'm guessing you actually meant "disagree with"/"deny the substance of," given the fact that you addressed to it anyway). Just understand that you made things personal by telling me I was removing something (implicitly mostly or entirely) because I didn't like it. I don't edit here often and haven't done so in a long time, but being chastised for a good faith edit by someone when I do isn't fun (when the appropriate policy could have just been pointed out. I would have been totally cool with that!).
I mean, do I sound like someone dumb enough to think that not liking a piece of information is valid grounds for suggesting its removal?
Gotta get back to the real world now, but man, give people the benefit of the doubt sometimes :)
Take care, sir or ma'am. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbutler3331 ( talk • contribs) 00:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Suzzane martin was the creator of crowded, so i put samjen productions because she founded the company — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendios105 ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
For rephrasing "critical acclaim" to "generally positive reviews" in
Drushyam yesterday based on a single review and thereby calling it a "few" ones. You made my day sir! Thank you!
![]() |
@ Pavanjandhyala: Thanks. Though I'm very happy to be jokey, my edit wasn't intended to be funny. So if it came across as a joke, then we should consider changing it, since I expect my edits to be consistent with NPOV. If only one review has been provided, then maybe "generally positive reviews" is not sufficient, but then neither is the sentimetn "it received critical acclaim". It's not abnormal to cite a source for a specific overall critical analysis. For example at Jupiter Ascending#Critical reception where the specific analysis is sourced to the Christian Science Monitor, but the aggregation results support the assertion. If it's different at Drushyam, then let's avoid any summary of critical response and go with a straight breakdown of reviews that are geared toward NPOV. "This review was 5/5, this review was 3.5/5, this was 3/5" etc. I'm not a big fan of summarizing critical response anyway. I'd rather pick a neutral balance of reviews and leave it at that. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 02:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
So as a general rule is there anytime when I should critical acclaim in an article? Broncosman12 ( talk) 02:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Broncosman12
They're a sockpuppet of User:6Flamingo, and exhibit exactly the same behaviour as both that user, and blocked socks such as User:ShwingGumme (note the similar manipulation of the naming as well). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Your recent action was improper because the PROD template says quite emphatically, "If this template is removed, do not replace it." Your suggestion that I should revert you to discuss the matter is also quite improper per WP:REVTALK. If you want the matter to be discussed then you should please start a discussion yourself. Andrew D. ( talk) 21:04, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I started a discussion section on the Futurama talk page if you'd like to contribute. Let me know what your thoughts are. I recognize that this is a case that is more ambiguous than the TV box guidelines indicate, but I feel that there is still a compelling argument for the two to be listed as related beyond single cross-over episodes or shows related merely by the same creator. I welcome your input! Luminum ( talk) 23:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry bout that, wasn't intending to revert you, just someone else. Rusted AutoParts 15:31, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Nothing personal with your comment about Stone Quackers. Just trying to improve the comment of the Gothball spinoff that John O'Hurley started in by expanding it as the way you described it. I had no idea that you had an issue with it. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 19:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I don't understand why you deleted my sentence about "wide critical acclaim." It is very common across movie articles on Wikipedia to indicate critical success in the film's introduction, and this especially holds because it is factually true as well that the film received critical acclaim, so I do not understand why you claim that we "aren't critical response aggregators." Can certainly provide references if you want evidence. I deleted a blurb about the film being in the IMDb top 250 because it is not true anymore... so I indicated the critical success this way. 72.231.8.79 ( talk) 23:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Never mind, I see that you've answered your issues with this under Mad Max. 72.231.8.79 ( talk) 23:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Endless Bomb |
Cyphoidbomb, this stupid bomb I got from the bomb store. You should give it a try. Dan9122 ( talk) 15:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC) |
![]() |
Google Day |
Happy Google Day! This is the best day ever, and I want you to suprise. Dan9122 ( talk) 15:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Cyphoid! Judging by your edits, would you happen to know anything about a mid-90s CBBC series called Monster Café? Some episodes can be found on YouTube. Pickuptha'Musket ( talk) 23:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Cyphoidbomb. I'm BackyardigansKaibigan, the leading contributor from the Backyardigans Wiki.
I noticed my edit was revised because it wasn't sourced. Can you tell my how I source my edit? I chatted with the Backyardigans' director, and we discussed the ages of the characters.
BackyardigansKaibigan ( talk) 01:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm just letting you know, I'm sorry. And I also apologize. FrozenFan2 ( talk) 12:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Cyphy, you made a mistake, YTV contacted me that "it premiered in 2006 not 2005". I know it because they told me that the show would have been under development in 2005.
P.S. I'm new to Wikipedia. I don't know about what to do with this site. Also, make a Quote of the Day in your front page. 108.48.98.241 ( talk) 09:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, C-Bomb. I'm feeling a bit worried that Wikipedia may have some users or even ip addresses that support ISIS with pro-ISIS pictures, comments and edits. I don't want this site to be a hotspot of terrorist activites. What can I do if I saw some edits, comments and pictures that glorifies ISIS? 174.113.217.132 ( talk) 21:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Apettyfer I noticed that you made a change to Liza Soberano, Article, but you didn't provide a source in her Television and film section. Thank You! Apettyfer ( talk) 00:01, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
For the recent thing that you have contacted me about revolving around Hulk and the Agents of S.M.A.S.H., the info about Michael Dorn voicing Supreme Intelligence and Patrick Seitz voicing Ghost Rider left by this anonymous contributor was premature. This contributor has been told by me to have an official news source for some of his contributions. Some of the ones he has submitted had been inaccurate like how he claimed that Travis Willingham would voice Hercules when he turned out to be voiced by Townsend Coleman. If you don't believe me, go to that person's link because he has not responded to a message I left for that anonymous contributor who has reverted my messages. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 22:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
PR was filmed at California, in Los Angeles and Santa Clarita in studies of MMPR Productions until 2002. Even in the credits of those series (MMPR- Time Force) is accredited. I have spoken with members of that production and they confirmed. There is a video uploaded to Youtube by the same members which shows the behind the scenes and locations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1p53R961vs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frederic1995 ( talk • contribs)
I Just saw your edits on DDD and let me tell you it's not neutral point of view but, I dont like it. By what means the film received negative/mixed reception? Tell e=me a single article were mixed reviews are follwed by better ones? Let's analyze. The film received positive reception overall.
Extended content
|
---|
|
Yeah, regarding your recent edit to the article... the page has been semi'd since November 2013. This shows up every time I click "edit":
I hope you'll understand. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 20:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, you keep reverting my edits on VeggieTales when you claim it needs "verifiably sources". Specifically, you revert my edit at the part where it says "The program was offered in the direct-to-video market, with the first 30-minute program, Where's God When I'm S-Scared?, released in July 1993." I keep changing July 1993 to December of 1993 because
1. If you read Phil Vischer's book "Me, Myself and Bob", it specifically states they finished the first video a few days before Christmas in December of 1993.
2. The top of the article states "The characters in VeggieTales were originally created by Phil Vischer. He and Mike Nawrocki began producing the films (Nawrocki later took over the entire project when the rights were bought by Classic Media), and they did many of the voices. Originally released in direct-to-video format, the series debuted on December 21, 1993." This is a contradiction I was simply correcting.
Also, the production company dates are factually incorrect as well. Lyrick Studios was not involved from the beginning (1993), they did not begin distributing the videos until 1998. HIT Entertainment bought Lyrick in 2001 and only distributed the videos until the end of the year, when Big Idea announced they'd switch. Finally, Classic Media did not buy the company until late 2003, when they fell into bankruptcy.
I do not understand why you keep reverting these edits when plenty of other articles do not cite dates when talking about production companies. I will not change it back to the way it should be until you respond to this, but I would appreciate it if you would stop reverting the edits simply because they are not cited. If you think the current dates are correct, where are the sources? NBA2030 ( talk) 15:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Overnight, I saw the new images of the 2016 Powerpuff Girls reboot and read about the new voice actors. Months ago, I signed a petition by a man named Matthew Coleman on Change.org to bring the Powerpuff Girls' original voices back and at the time it was progressing, it was shared by a former Cartoon Network representative. However although it made progress it didn't get through- but I don't know for sure! Anyway while the new pictures depict the new versions of Blossom Bubbles and Buttercup looking excatly like their original counterparts, but with two mediocre touches, I'm scared that once the new Powerpuff Girls series airs sometime next year it'll be just I'm imagining- Cartoon Network is gonna stop caring about the original Powerpuff Girls series that aired from 1998 to 2005, they and everyone else will take the original for granted, and pretend that it doesn't exist anymore- erase the original PPG series from Cartoon Network's history, as well as the original PPG website on cartoonnetwork.com because of the reboot. Remember the original 2003 Teen Titans series? Cartoon Network took that for granted after Teen Titans Go! premiered at they replaced it with Teen Titans Go!- even its website got replaced on cartoonnetwork.com! That's exactly what's gonna happen to the original Powerpuff Girls series once the new series comes next year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zboogie604 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zboogie604 ( talk • contribs)
It's up to you. I'm tired. Bye.
IreneTandry ( talk) 19:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
there was a person of interest posted for north attleboro massachusetts. this person is not from North Attleboro, and if it is going to be placed there, there should clarity. Truth is constructive — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeblow ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't agree with this source. It's not a verified Twitter account. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 17:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi I'm Happysaddy as i want you to know that i undo your work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happysaddy ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
You Been Blocked From Editing Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happysaddy ( talk • contribs) 15:28, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
if the murderer is of such trivial interest why is he listed there at all? That's my point, using your words — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeblow ( talk • contribs) 01:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
I noticed a vandal amongst the Backyardigans' page. She is a relentless vandal. She vandalizes the sole Backyardigans Wiki as well. Please block her. It makes me sad to see her being rude to the series.
2601:4:1D82:B600:129A:DDFF:FE65:B884 ( talk) 05:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
2601:40D:C000:ECF2:F43A:9DFC:97BA:19F9 ( talk) 01:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I didn't mention any source because I got the news from a YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2ZPz39kDjc I don't think it counts as an appropriate source.
Greetings, Kikker v11. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kikker v11 ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
I think you know me from the issue about the Jimmy Two-Shoes article. I'm very glad writing to you again. The problem is I'm editing this article according to data I've gathered and I've cited through the article, and this user is disrupting my edits, which is a fault on the first Wikipedia rule: "Anyone can edit". Now, I understand that I'm being silly about this, but I have sources which can prove my point on this edit, being reverted [1] [2] [3] [4] repetitively. I'm not basing the articles with my facts. I've made a research on different forums and I've been looking for webs which had the information I needed, but this user is persistent on this and doesn't want the changes to be added. For the record, this is the same user that time ago tried to manipulate the Main article of the channel from being US localized to International, something many users, including administrators, rejected. Please, help me. He has a long time being here, and I'm just one year and still learning, but I'm not rude with everybody here. Hope you understand. Sincerely. - Bankster1 ( talk) 00:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Edit: Also, we both violated the 3RR rule, but I rejected to revert his edition due to position he may do to prove him right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bankster1 ( talk • contribs) 00:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Bankster1 ( talk) 03:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Could you please add Alex Russo to your watchlist? An unresponsive editor keeps unnecessarily adding colour to the infobox. He's veen reverted at other articles but for some reason keeps targeting this one with some poor contrast colours and a polite request hasn't helped. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 16:14, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I am in the process of rewriting the page, and I currently plan not to "go live" until I have your feedback unless you take too long to respond. How would you suggest that I put the content into a less fan-oriented way while having the same info in it? -- Super3588 ( talk) 19:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
So I'm starting to suspect some widespread socking and long term abuse on cartoon articles... there's just too many folks trying to change genres. Just seems too common to be a coincidence. Curious what you thought. Pinging Geraldo Perez as well since they also deal with these edits. Am I just being paranoid? EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 01:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
It's Australian (in case you were curious). -- kelapstick( bainuu) 00:54, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for putting a block on 173.50.64.195. We had lots of vandalism on List of programs broadcast by Qubo. This person undone the edits that I have corrected earlier today. I spent 20 minutes correcting and removing false information s/he did. Right now, it is originally back the way s/he put it as if this person thinks the information s/he found was true. We do not where or how s/he got the information. We definitely sure it is false. Unfortunately, I cannot revert it due to the person who re-corrected the information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbears22 ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for replying back. 173.50.64.195 has been driving me nuts and probably s/he is putting false information on the page. Therefore, I requested a page protection for the List of programs broadcast by Qubo page for vandalism and putting future tv shows in which it has not happened yet. I just found out that Ged UK has already requested to semi-protect the programming page. Cbears22 ( talk) 01:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
What a shame. I looked at the editing times/days of the Finealt socks and there is no overlap with edits by Dcbanners. At least not for the past 5 weeks. SMH. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hey Cyphoidbomb. As you know, I'm a frequent editor of the article List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network. My question is: what will it take to get the article up to GA status, and what do you think is the "ideal" list of TV shows article? Should it be simplified to look like List of programs broadcast by CBS? Should the tables with distributors, premiere/end dates, notes, refs, etc. go and be replaced with the old list format?-- Phil A. Fry ( talk) 00:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Where do you come from?
Malmsimp ( talk) 20:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
You reverted my edit on the page Courage the Cowardly Dog regarding Nowhere. Have you seen the intro? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtMLRQtCblw — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepspace9odo ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Haha. >:( — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Deepspace9odo (
talk •
contribs)
07:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
I had to report you to ANI for harassment. The sources I used on the Kip Mckean page are reliable sources.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Cyphoidbomb_keeps_harassing_my_edits_and_reporting_me._He_is_using_reporting_as_a_weapon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qewr4231 ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For your willingness to politely discuss contentious issues, and your exemplary efforts in reducing fancruft from Hindi film articles. Krimuk|90 ( talk) 03:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC) |
A "friend" of yours appears to have moved to List of Jessie episodes. [5] [6] -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 17:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
List of Clarence episodes. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in
loss of editing privileges. Diff:
[7] Your edits here appear look an awful lot like intentional disruption. The content you added is not found in the sources you attributed.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk)
00:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I appreciate you reflecting on the incident, giving Saginaw-hitchhiker an apology, and fixing the url. Well done for that. I looked into this incident because it's highly unusual for a user who has 30 Good Articles under their belt to indulge in vandalism. Regards SilkTork ✔Tea time 16:56, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Just noting, in case you're keeping track, that 107.1.219.46 just added a stealthy vandalism to the YGG! Eps list. RossO ( talk) 16:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb. I did not create that article. I was excited to see something written about me. I added the picture. I'm not a professional 'wikieditior'... I didn't log in all the time. Wgolf had the band pages deleted, then added the article for deletion on Craig Walendziak after I tried to TALK with him on his talk page. It just makes me sick to my stomach. That article is more factual then 75% of the stuff on here... but I have to defend it because Wgolf is CAMPAIGNING for his friends to get it deleted.
I'm new here... not malicious.
C Craig mack378 ( talk)
Thanks.
C
Is my editing really that sloppy? :'-( Norozco1 ( talk) 09:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
No issues with your reverts. I did a quick check though and Calendar Girls has a release date of August 7, 2015 so I moved it there. The other movie being removed is more complicated. Hungama gives the release date only as 2015. I didn't dig into any of the other sources or search for anything more definite than that. *shrug* - not really sure what to do on that one. Ravensfire ( talk) 18:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Currently it's unreliable. Only one user PallaviSave is adding it and she even tried to create a cinechicken page. It would be better if you remove any material citing Cinechicken. -- C E ( talk) 10:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm wondering why you took out what you did. If you look on your website, you can properly see that this is a real thing, in the form of a press release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrishl ( talk • contribs) 16:14, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
How dare you say it's dubious of me to say my husband of twenty-five years passed away. I just wanted you guys to know because he loved editing this site and though some of his editing buddies could send condolences. At least one editor knew it was right. Shame on you. (
Mrs. Meltdown (
talk)
21:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC))
And get off your high horse. TheDethklokGuy ( talk) 03:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Now that the character list content is moved to the main page (although still in comments), is it time to nuke the page? AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 00:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I accept motherlandmagazine source but , now are you going to prove this is also reliable?
http://www.darkmoon.in/mrx-review
which becomes
http://blog.darkmoon.in/bollywood-horror/mr-x-film-review/
-- C E ( talk) 15:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
You recently participated in a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Archive 20#Presenters' years in infobox. Subsequent to this discussion, an RfC has been opened at Talk:Top Gear (2002 TV series)#RfC: Should years be included in the infobox, in which you may be interested in participating. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 14:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoid. I'm not sure why, but whenever I pull up the contributions for an IPv6, the letters in the ID are always displayed in CAPS, so that's how I copy-paste them into the list at User:Cyphoidbomb/Marhc Vandal. However, currently on that page, many of the entries show those same addresses with the letters in lowercase. This makes it somewhat difficult to see which IPs have already been listed. Apparently, I am not the only one who has experienced this; you just entered one identical to the one right above it. Only it was vice-versa, adding lowercase with caps version already existing. Where are you getting the lowercase form? -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 22:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
For info, in the unlikely chance that you miss it: Special:Contributions/194.81.223.1. Best, — SMALL JIM 12:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Why did you undone my edit? We don't know who Timmy married at the end of Channel Chasers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JerrySa1 ( talk • contribs) 21:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
18:58, 25 March 2015 Cyphoidbomb (talk | contribs) . . (59,819 bytes) (-3) . . (Undid revision 653492284 by Yoshams (talk) Unsourced and questionable. Regular typists can type that fast.)
Regarding the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_captioning under the section "Technical development of closed captioning", third paragraph, the number you revised the edit to (225) is unrealistic. The highest WPM recorded is 212. Could you possibly provide a source for where you got that number? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.64.220.178 ( talk) 12:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I see you removed my reference at the ICC page "saying that is not how we cite books" and that is wasn't appropriate, care to expand? JamieBrown2011 ( talk) 13:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Confirming your first opinion and decided to revert you on Movies on this one; at least with NAM there was some polishing of the writing before they threw up their 'best network ever' spin; this is all just completely unchecked press releases that are so unattributed that I'm surprised that Viacom's lawyers haven't slammed it off the web yet. If I see this, I'm reverting, plain and simple. Nate • ( chatter) 05:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Mr. Teatime references the Death family motto in Hogfather (it was also mentioned in the TV adaptation). [1]
N1ckFG ( talk) 01:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
I just got your message about the Nicktoons edit (I was off the internet lol) It's all good I'll fix the errors if there's any left but yeah don't worry about it. TheUpdates ( talk) 03:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Our buddy has been busy today. Hope you don't mind, but I have made several changes to your vandal page on him. Feel free to tweak, correct, add to, or revert any of my changes as you see fit. Thanks. -- RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 00:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
All my edits are sourced stop undoing them
first All upcoming series were confirmed either by CN Arabia itself or the dubbing studio
second The list of programs currently broadcast , is outdated it's from March , I updated it to correspond the May schedule same thing for the reruns
Then we have the minor edits i did Tasali in arabic تسالي is written with ي not ى or else it will be read tasala other thing , Chowder , Camp lazlo , dexter's lab and Powerpuff girls are CN Originals and not aquired series , you need a source for that ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaiserNeko ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello! My source is at the end of each Metacritic credits page, for example let's take this one from Unfriended here. At the end of the page, it states that "Movie title data, credits, and poster art provided by: IMDb". Genre and all information on the page are duplicated from IMDb here. This goes for all the films on the site. Ditto for the film I edited (Big Hero 6): here and here Andrzejbanas ( talk) 18:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
How can you refute the IP's unsourced additions when none of the existing content is sourced? — MusikAnimal talk 16:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I have approved your request. Please wait until an admin can come to take care of this. Electrified Man Attacks! ( Face my wrath!) 11:48, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Just cuz I feel like it.
Electrified Man Attacks! (
Face my wrath!)
11:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Kind of poor form to assume that I removed that piece of information because I didn't like it, isn't it? I genuinely thought it was useless/superseded information that didn't add to anyone's knowledge of the film, but I did look at a number of another of other film pages and it looks like Metacritic is very commonly cited. (Although for what it's worth I didn't find any movies citing information aggregated from as few as six reviews!).
I.e., I admit to making a procedural error, but you certainly weren't very friendly/reasonable about it (attributing a primary motive other than the legitimate one I mentioned in my edit). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbutler3331 ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Who says an 11 word statement can't involve editorializing? I think it's pretty clear that you were suggesting that I removed the information (mostly/entirely) because I didn't like it. You could have done the proper thing and just pointed out why the material belonged in the article. Instead, you chose to make it personal (about my motives).
You happen to be right - I was a little taken aback that the article could indicate that the critical consensus involved "Overwhelming dislike" based on just six reviews (when most movies on the site that cite Metacritic have dozens, and one of the reviews was even quoted on Metacritic as saying "Ban this sick filth." Really, that's legitimate criticism?), but it seemed like a totally legitimate edit to make considering the aforementioned facts and the additional redundancy involved since these reviews were included as part of the larger Rotten Tomatoes sample. You've pointed out why I was wrong with these assumptions, at least per Wiki policy, and I admit error there (I have only edited very sporadically over the years), but that still doesn't excuse your (twice, now) impugning my motives for removing the information.
Ignore whatever you want; it's your prerogative (I'm guessing you actually meant "disagree with"/"deny the substance of," given the fact that you addressed to it anyway). Just understand that you made things personal by telling me I was removing something (implicitly mostly or entirely) because I didn't like it. I don't edit here often and haven't done so in a long time, but being chastised for a good faith edit by someone when I do isn't fun (when the appropriate policy could have just been pointed out. I would have been totally cool with that!).
I mean, do I sound like someone dumb enough to think that not liking a piece of information is valid grounds for suggesting its removal?
Gotta get back to the real world now, but man, give people the benefit of the doubt sometimes :)
Take care, sir or ma'am. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbutler3331 ( talk • contribs) 00:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Suzzane martin was the creator of crowded, so i put samjen productions because she founded the company — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendios105 ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
For rephrasing "critical acclaim" to "generally positive reviews" in
Drushyam yesterday based on a single review and thereby calling it a "few" ones. You made my day sir! Thank you!
![]() |
@ Pavanjandhyala: Thanks. Though I'm very happy to be jokey, my edit wasn't intended to be funny. So if it came across as a joke, then we should consider changing it, since I expect my edits to be consistent with NPOV. If only one review has been provided, then maybe "generally positive reviews" is not sufficient, but then neither is the sentimetn "it received critical acclaim". It's not abnormal to cite a source for a specific overall critical analysis. For example at Jupiter Ascending#Critical reception where the specific analysis is sourced to the Christian Science Monitor, but the aggregation results support the assertion. If it's different at Drushyam, then let's avoid any summary of critical response and go with a straight breakdown of reviews that are geared toward NPOV. "This review was 5/5, this review was 3.5/5, this was 3/5" etc. I'm not a big fan of summarizing critical response anyway. I'd rather pick a neutral balance of reviews and leave it at that. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 02:24, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
So as a general rule is there anytime when I should critical acclaim in an article? Broncosman12 ( talk) 02:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Broncosman12
They're a sockpuppet of User:6Flamingo, and exhibit exactly the same behaviour as both that user, and blocked socks such as User:ShwingGumme (note the similar manipulation of the naming as well). Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Your recent action was improper because the PROD template says quite emphatically, "If this template is removed, do not replace it." Your suggestion that I should revert you to discuss the matter is also quite improper per WP:REVTALK. If you want the matter to be discussed then you should please start a discussion yourself. Andrew D. ( talk) 21:04, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I started a discussion section on the Futurama talk page if you'd like to contribute. Let me know what your thoughts are. I recognize that this is a case that is more ambiguous than the TV box guidelines indicate, but I feel that there is still a compelling argument for the two to be listed as related beyond single cross-over episodes or shows related merely by the same creator. I welcome your input! Luminum ( talk) 23:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry bout that, wasn't intending to revert you, just someone else. Rusted AutoParts 15:31, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Nothing personal with your comment about Stone Quackers. Just trying to improve the comment of the Gothball spinoff that John O'Hurley started in by expanding it as the way you described it. I had no idea that you had an issue with it. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 19:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I don't understand why you deleted my sentence about "wide critical acclaim." It is very common across movie articles on Wikipedia to indicate critical success in the film's introduction, and this especially holds because it is factually true as well that the film received critical acclaim, so I do not understand why you claim that we "aren't critical response aggregators." Can certainly provide references if you want evidence. I deleted a blurb about the film being in the IMDb top 250 because it is not true anymore... so I indicated the critical success this way. 72.231.8.79 ( talk) 23:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Never mind, I see that you've answered your issues with this under Mad Max. 72.231.8.79 ( talk) 23:34, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Endless Bomb |
Cyphoidbomb, this stupid bomb I got from the bomb store. You should give it a try. Dan9122 ( talk) 15:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC) |
![]() |
Google Day |
Happy Google Day! This is the best day ever, and I want you to suprise. Dan9122 ( talk) 15:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Cyphoid! Judging by your edits, would you happen to know anything about a mid-90s CBBC series called Monster Café? Some episodes can be found on YouTube. Pickuptha'Musket ( talk) 23:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Cyphoidbomb. I'm BackyardigansKaibigan, the leading contributor from the Backyardigans Wiki.
I noticed my edit was revised because it wasn't sourced. Can you tell my how I source my edit? I chatted with the Backyardigans' director, and we discussed the ages of the characters.
BackyardigansKaibigan ( talk) 01:10, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm just letting you know, I'm sorry. And I also apologize. FrozenFan2 ( talk) 12:57, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Cyphy, you made a mistake, YTV contacted me that "it premiered in 2006 not 2005". I know it because they told me that the show would have been under development in 2005.
P.S. I'm new to Wikipedia. I don't know about what to do with this site. Also, make a Quote of the Day in your front page. 108.48.98.241 ( talk) 09:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, C-Bomb. I'm feeling a bit worried that Wikipedia may have some users or even ip addresses that support ISIS with pro-ISIS pictures, comments and edits. I don't want this site to be a hotspot of terrorist activites. What can I do if I saw some edits, comments and pictures that glorifies ISIS? 174.113.217.132 ( talk) 21:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Apettyfer I noticed that you made a change to Liza Soberano, Article, but you didn't provide a source in her Television and film section. Thank You! Apettyfer ( talk) 00:01, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
For the recent thing that you have contacted me about revolving around Hulk and the Agents of S.M.A.S.H., the info about Michael Dorn voicing Supreme Intelligence and Patrick Seitz voicing Ghost Rider left by this anonymous contributor was premature. This contributor has been told by me to have an official news source for some of his contributions. Some of the ones he has submitted had been inaccurate like how he claimed that Travis Willingham would voice Hercules when he turned out to be voiced by Townsend Coleman. If you don't believe me, go to that person's link because he has not responded to a message I left for that anonymous contributor who has reverted my messages. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 22:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
PR was filmed at California, in Los Angeles and Santa Clarita in studies of MMPR Productions until 2002. Even in the credits of those series (MMPR- Time Force) is accredited. I have spoken with members of that production and they confirmed. There is a video uploaded to Youtube by the same members which shows the behind the scenes and locations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1p53R961vs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frederic1995 ( talk • contribs)
I Just saw your edits on DDD and let me tell you it's not neutral point of view but, I dont like it. By what means the film received negative/mixed reception? Tell e=me a single article were mixed reviews are follwed by better ones? Let's analyze. The film received positive reception overall.
Extended content
|
---|
|
Yeah, regarding your recent edit to the article... the page has been semi'd since November 2013. This shows up every time I click "edit":
I hope you'll understand. Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 20:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, you keep reverting my edits on VeggieTales when you claim it needs "verifiably sources". Specifically, you revert my edit at the part where it says "The program was offered in the direct-to-video market, with the first 30-minute program, Where's God When I'm S-Scared?, released in July 1993." I keep changing July 1993 to December of 1993 because
1. If you read Phil Vischer's book "Me, Myself and Bob", it specifically states they finished the first video a few days before Christmas in December of 1993.
2. The top of the article states "The characters in VeggieTales were originally created by Phil Vischer. He and Mike Nawrocki began producing the films (Nawrocki later took over the entire project when the rights were bought by Classic Media), and they did many of the voices. Originally released in direct-to-video format, the series debuted on December 21, 1993." This is a contradiction I was simply correcting.
Also, the production company dates are factually incorrect as well. Lyrick Studios was not involved from the beginning (1993), they did not begin distributing the videos until 1998. HIT Entertainment bought Lyrick in 2001 and only distributed the videos until the end of the year, when Big Idea announced they'd switch. Finally, Classic Media did not buy the company until late 2003, when they fell into bankruptcy.
I do not understand why you keep reverting these edits when plenty of other articles do not cite dates when talking about production companies. I will not change it back to the way it should be until you respond to this, but I would appreciate it if you would stop reverting the edits simply because they are not cited. If you think the current dates are correct, where are the sources? NBA2030 ( talk) 15:45, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Overnight, I saw the new images of the 2016 Powerpuff Girls reboot and read about the new voice actors. Months ago, I signed a petition by a man named Matthew Coleman on Change.org to bring the Powerpuff Girls' original voices back and at the time it was progressing, it was shared by a former Cartoon Network representative. However although it made progress it didn't get through- but I don't know for sure! Anyway while the new pictures depict the new versions of Blossom Bubbles and Buttercup looking excatly like their original counterparts, but with two mediocre touches, I'm scared that once the new Powerpuff Girls series airs sometime next year it'll be just I'm imagining- Cartoon Network is gonna stop caring about the original Powerpuff Girls series that aired from 1998 to 2005, they and everyone else will take the original for granted, and pretend that it doesn't exist anymore- erase the original PPG series from Cartoon Network's history, as well as the original PPG website on cartoonnetwork.com because of the reboot. Remember the original 2003 Teen Titans series? Cartoon Network took that for granted after Teen Titans Go! premiered at they replaced it with Teen Titans Go!- even its website got replaced on cartoonnetwork.com! That's exactly what's gonna happen to the original Powerpuff Girls series once the new series comes next year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zboogie604 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zboogie604 ( talk • contribs)
It's up to you. I'm tired. Bye.
IreneTandry ( talk) 19:17, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
there was a person of interest posted for north attleboro massachusetts. this person is not from North Attleboro, and if it is going to be placed there, there should clarity. Truth is constructive — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeblow ( talk • contribs) 03:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
I don't agree with this source. It's not a verified Twitter account. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 17:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi I'm Happysaddy as i want you to know that i undo your work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happysaddy ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
You Been Blocked From Editing Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happysaddy ( talk • contribs) 15:28, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
if the murderer is of such trivial interest why is he listed there at all? That's my point, using your words — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeblow ( talk • contribs) 01:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
I noticed a vandal amongst the Backyardigans' page. She is a relentless vandal. She vandalizes the sole Backyardigans Wiki as well. Please block her. It makes me sad to see her being rude to the series.
2601:4:1D82:B600:129A:DDFF:FE65:B884 ( talk) 05:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
2601:40D:C000:ECF2:F43A:9DFC:97BA:19F9 ( talk) 01:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I didn't mention any source because I got the news from a YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2ZPz39kDjc I don't think it counts as an appropriate source.
Greetings, Kikker v11. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kikker v11 ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 15 June 2015 (UTC)