![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
References
Hello administration,l need from you i.e I have to learn how to find webpage url value to add webpage as external link on Wikipedia reference so please help me to get way how to know webpage value Thank you Sri Harsha Malempati ( talk) 19:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
How to add external link how to find URL particular webpage Where will find URL. Sri Harsha Malempati ( talk) 12:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I was about to implement this edit, but this by a user made be hesitate. Krishnan is a the name of Ramya's father. Hence shouldn't be referred to as Ramya throughout the article ? Correct me if I am wrong. 86.97.129.224 ( talk) 13:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi can you please check this user's contributions as they seem problematic. They seem to be promoting an actress and actor and may also be connected to lifetime entertainment. They have created articles on an actor and actress which is ok but then they have boosted their billing positions in existing articles and created film and tv articles that misrepresent the correct billing. For example Freshwater (film) was created with the claim that Donnabella had a starring role but rotten tomatoes does not have her in the first5 and the official DVD has her at 8 and from Youtube her character is killed early on. I've reverted a number of their edits, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 18:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi user:Cyphoidbomb,
In Ishqbaaaz article, how to add an award section?
Previously, I added award section on Ishqbaaaz. But you removed. You said that the section contents meets with it own network/channel. Now the question is "How to fix it?" and "How to legally add the award section?"
Thank You, Siddiq Sazzad ( talk) 14:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb what do you mean by inappropriate for an encyclopedia? All added links were relevant to the topic. It would be great if you help me to understand what guidelines I've not followed to avoid future mistakes. Mrugeshsingh ( talk) 05:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi! How are you? I want to let you know that some anonymous users are editing the page, and most of the edits are wrong. I don't know which is the last stable version of the page, and it if I would restore someone will again edit it. I also have made a WP:RFP for the page but got no response. Some reviews for the film have been published, if the page could be protected by those users so the trusted users can easily add the reviews. Please help, Thanks! M. Billoo 19:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
How to review a common media photo? Where I will find the photo reviewers user? Specially for Pinterest photo. Please reply me.
Thank You, Siddiq Sazzad ( talk) 15:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
@ user:Cyphoidbomb How to review a photo?
Siddiq Sazzad ( talk) 16:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Actually, I'm a storkismist. Scientific storkism] Jim1138 ( talk) 03:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Our delivery-stork-denialist is back Sara Gilbert ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) & Linda Perry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) different IP. I reverted and warned. On my watch-list now. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 08:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
I've seen you give at least a few editors a hard time and imply or claim they're "paid editors" based on the fact that there is commonality of the subject matter between articles they've edited. I notice you create and edit a lot of Indian articles. Are you a paid editor? Or otherwise compensated? Do you have a COI problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.234.100.169 ( talk) 04:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
ANI on Linda Perry and Sara Gilbert Jim1138 ( talk) 01:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Cyphoidbomb,
You made a little mistake. You added guest star members in main cast. Actually it is not you fault. First mistake has done by Anonymous User. Now I fixed that problem. Please don't ever trust Anonymous Users.
Thanks, Siddiq Sazzad ( talk) 13:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 18:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
We've contacted Oshwah about this, but he seems to be very busy these days. IJBall and myself could use your input. This user has a plethora of warnings on their talk page and refuses to discuss and instead tries to silently stonewall their changes. I've reported this user either two or three times now to AIV and admins have rejected the report each time. I think an indefinite block is warranted, personally, but I'd be fine with any type of block if a block were to be placed. In any case, we're kind of at a loss on what to do now since admins don't seem to be seeing their disruptiveness. Thanks. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 20:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:201x television seasons and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:201x American television seasons continue to be problematic. ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2018 American television seasons was deleted only two days ago but it's already been recreated by an editor who clearly didn't read the inclusion criteria. I've had to empty this and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2018 television seasons, which the same editor has also recreated, several times. To avoid this happening next year, would it be possible to create protect ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2019 television seasons and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2019 American television seasons until 1 January 2019? This would be greatly appreciated. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 04:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Just adding that I've emptied ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2018 television seasons and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2018 American television seasons and nominated them for deletion but, sadly, I fully expect them to be recreated before 2018. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 04:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
The question here is much more narrow though: should categories that are not empty be deleted without discussion using a tool for deleting empty categories?- The categories were empty when they were deleted.
how does the community feel about "Upcoming" cats like "Upcoming 2018 TV series"? I see lots of 2018 films (etc)- I think I raised it earlier this year but can't remember the outcome. I think it would actually be against the spirit of WP:TVUPCOMING. The other issue here is that once the seasons begin airing, typically in September/October, the seasons are no longer upcoming but they still haven't aired episodes in the year following the year in which they start airing. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 15:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
A few weeks ago he was editing as Ason271 which you blocked on October 7th. He's back with a new impersonation account - Ason20 in the same areas. Would you mind reviewing and blocking if warranted? Thanks. Ravensfire ( talk) 20:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
... claims to be an admin. Nothing to do with you, I presume? I've blocked it. Bishonen | talk 19:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC).
How do I undo bad edits by returning them to initial edits without erasing or typing all over again? Fghsfijgig ( talk) 19:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your response, its my mistake that i did not discussed it on talk page, first of all i want to clear one thing that no one is paying me to do this, Firstly i have created Wikipedia page of Director Bhaurao Karhade, as per his recent updates it looks that he decided to use his full name everywhere from now Ref - [1], [2] so as i told that i created this article firstly, so its my responsibility to update Wikipedia articles Name accordingly, so i accept my mistake that i did not discussed it before, but i want to declare that i did not created it against money, and according to me changing the persons name does not indicate that its marketing or something, and I know very well that Wikipedia is not marketing platform. wikibot 18:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(
help)
Winged Blades Godric 12:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Variations to standard offer:
The six-month threshold can be adjustable under special circumstances. If an editor shows an unusually good insight into the circumstances that led to the block, and sets out a credible proposal for how they will deal with those issues in future, then a return might be considered sooner.
On the other hand, if the indefinitely blocked/banned user continues to be especially disruptive, or has engaged in particularly serious misconduct, then some administrators may become unwilling to consider a return for a much longer time or, quite possibly, ever.
Banned users seeking a return are well-advised to make significant and useful contributions to other WMF projects prior to requesting a return to English Wikipedia per this 'offer'. Many unban requests have been declined due to the banned user simply waiting the six months out, without making any contributions to other projects.
I would like to use a committed identity..so that that you can unban me and allow me to edit wikipedia from January 2018.
I would like to attach my email ID, PAN CARD, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, AADHAR CARD, PASSPORT NUMER to user padmalakshmisx.
I am here to expand lot of articles on south cinema. I am not here to disrupt them. I have lot of information on this that other editors lack. most of these articles are edited by amateurs. I am the only experienced editor. Please give opportunity to edit.
I will not use the following in my edits:
Please dont block this username, I wish to use this to communicate with administrators such as you.
Please discuss my issue as special case with arbitration committee... Notforediting ( talk) 09:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Please check out Steve Shives Youtube page 5 things that you just can't believe for the week. The last one since the election is always "THe furthor misadventures of Lord Dampnut" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.84.167.2 ( talk) 18:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
How's it going Cyphoidbomb :) I saw something interesting that I would like to show you - [1]. Also sharing an interesting article from Mint. Let There Be Sunshine ( talk) 08:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you said the ICTF consensus is no conversions in the infobox. I find this a somewhat odd decision, since mentioning the USD amount would make more sense (especially for non-Indian readers). I'd like to understand the rationale behind this consensus. Could you maybe post a link to ICTF's consensus regarding this? Maestro2016 ( talk) 02:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Cyphoidbomb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey, look at the article history. There's a new user, Siddhant2709, that appears to have a strong COI and has made some troubling edits and edit summary. I left a pretty pointed warning on their talk page that hopefully will get them in the right direction, but I think it may bear some admin watching. I think there will be enough editorial eyes on it (I'm posting on the Indian noticeboard next), so please stay uninvolved as an editor if you can! Appreciate it. Ravensfire ( talk) 05:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Please need your help, see Ishqbaaaz page. I don't want to get into edit war. Thank You. JayB91 ( talk) 17:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
It looks like he's back, again. You might want to take a look at his SPI page (I've added User:Roverisk122). LightandDark2000 ( talk) 00:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Maybe I sounded a little annoyed, but it wasn't my intention. I'm sorry. I didn't take the remove of that part as personal, I just said it wasn't from me and that nobody reviewing the article previously had find a problem with it. I also took the opportunity to invite you to review the grammar, since I may commit some mistakes for still not having English at its most proficient level, and I don't have enough time or even patience to improve every bit, as the article is getting bigger, many of its kind seem to be kinda abandoned recently, and I'm just one person, so any help is welcome (I was actually hoping for someone to appear pointing out something wrong, 'cause I need help on reviewing). By the way, the problem there is not about grammar, as I can see, but concerning Wikipedia's policies. I'm kinda outdated about that and also don't have time to read the whole stuff again.
I purpose a partnership: review the whole article carefully and tell me about everything that's wrong concerning the policies or even grammar, and I will seek to provide sources for everything necessary.
And, please, don't threaten anonymous users saying the page is close to be protected, as you did here. I still know about the rules and remember this, although I'm obviously a veteran. I have seen many administrators committing that mistake. I know many anonymous users are vandals, but you need to have patience. And before you suggest, no, I don't want to create an account, as my only desire is to improve that single article. Nothing else, no benefits, since I prefer to not come back. 200.232.190.111 ( talk) 03:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Hi! I noticed some sources, and I wasn't sure if they were reliable. Since I thought that you probably have much more expertise in this field than I do, I wanted to ask if you could help me with this issue. Here's the relevant discussion: Talk:List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes#New sources found: 12/13/17 UTC
If you could help me with this, that would be very useful!
Thanks!
Noah Kastin ( talk) ( 🖋) 07:40, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Just replying re: this. No problem with contesting it, but PRODs are a relatively normal way we handle UPE cleanup when G5 wouldn't be appropriate, even if it slipped through the cracks when initially discovered. I've sent it to AfD as a TOU violation, but the notability question doesn't matter at all here in my view. TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
I made changes to the article removed fan stuff any more changes?? it looks neutral now-- Starunique ( talk) 11:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm working at Director SUKUMAR's office. His date of year is 1971, please correct with it.. Pavan kumar (sukumar blood fan) ( talk) 13:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018! |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!
![]() |
Merry Christmas Cyphoidbomb!!
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia!
,
–
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year
13:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 22:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Holidays |
From Stave one of Dickens
A Christmas Carol
So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD| Talk 00:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you Marnette! Best to you this Christmas! Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 00:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
wishing you a merry christmas and a joyful new year. :) :) Starunique ( talk) 13:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! |
Wish you a Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year 2018! – GSS ( talk| c| em) 18:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC) |
Amaury ( talk | contribs) 08:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Remove Sequrity Bibhuaggarawal29 ( talk) 07:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For all the thankless edits you have been performing here while facing hostility. Thanks for everything you have been doing for WP. Happy Holidays! Yashthepunisher ( talk) 12:05, 27 December 2017 (UTC) |
vijay appeared in a short commercial video about herova? zerova? as far as i know it was just an television advertisement about educational awareness will that come under his philanthropy work section or some other section Starunique ( talk) 19:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
I am just asking that what people does in television advertisement will it come under philanthropy or the advertisement section nothing else Starunique ( talk) 09:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
08:28, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
You are invited to join the discussions at
Talk:Kiznaiver#Why does this series matter? and at
Talk:Kiznaiver#Episode summaries.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
06:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Please hava a look at Jaynagar I and Jaynagar II on Notice Board for India-related topics. Cheers. - Chandan Guha ( talk) 04:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles#Header issues.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
04:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
please edit wikipedia yourselfs rather than allowing users to edit and later deleating the edit claiming even ibtimes report as unreliable source .The reports edited by wikipedia admins even contains reports by blogs but when users edit with ibtimes report you are claiming that to be unreliable source. EAGLE EYE boxoffice analayser ( talk) 20:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Cyphoidbomb I assume you think I am Sahib college but I’m not I am a different user so please can you add the template tag on the bottom of Lopamudra Raut’s article please thank you User:109.152.176.247
I started a discussion about using multiple sources for film financials here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Using multiple sources for film gross figures. Your thoughts and suggestions on the best way forward would be appreciated! Ravensfire ( talk) 02:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I would appreciate your comments here as always, Cyphoidbomb. Do let me know if you are interested in leaving comments by pinging me. Thanks.
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
15:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending!
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
15:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Cyphoidbomb,
A user Ahmed Lutfe Inam has told me about a new Wikipedia rule that I never heard. Here is it. He told me that "I need permissions to edit his article". The page that he talk about, is not semi-protected page and I have rights of Extended confirmed user. Please explain me What I should do now. Thank You -- Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 13:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, if you guys really checked my latest article, you may have known that a reference was added by Siddiqsazzad001 which had no connection with the article. I removed it once and notified him that the source is not presenting the article. But again Siddiqsazzad001 added it. I still didn't delete it. Don' you think a false reference should be removed from Wikipedia? And as an administrator, I expected some good behavior, but didn't get it. You may me a big person, but please first check the article or ask Siddiqsazzad001 and then increase your mentality. It'll help you in the near future. Ahmed Lutfe Inam ( talk) 02:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I do understand. Pardon me because I'm new and I didn't know to discuss about it. And I am not giving anyone any warning. I'm just telling that he is adding unreliable references which is not matching the article's subject. You can check it on the references tab on Jatir Janak Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Govt. College. Ahmed Lutfe Inam ( talk) 08:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Cyphoidbomb,
I need a little help here, I just read your user page and realized that you are an administrator.
I recently created an article
Draft: Son Of Abish and awaiting for review, I want this contribution of mine to be evaluated. Earlier I had created another article
Draft: Walter Hamada it has same issue, and about a day later I found an article was already published, hence I copied the code to
Walter Hamada
Kindly consider this request.
Thanks
Sonuverse (
talk)
05:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- That should do. Sonuverse ( talk) 09:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Cyphoid, would you mind dropping in on the article for the Thirteenth Doctor. We have an IP who persists in removing sourced material; he's been reverted by three editors and is at four reverts under his current IP (about six or seven total.) I'm not sure whether a block or a page protection is the best move given he's IP hopping, but something needs to be done! He's not responding to requests to use the talk page. I appreciate your help! ----Dr.Margi ✉ 16:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Regarding this edit I just checked that I made a mistake in a hurry while writing about this piece of information because of some confusion regarding the Alzheimer's disease. I didn't mean to copy/paste, I just wasn't aware of what the disease is and how it led to her father's death with the whole "bodily functions" thing. Other than this minor error, I have not copied content from other sources, you can check for yourself. Also, I've inserted the information on Shinde's depression into the appropriate section. I'm new to writing articles about people so I might've made some mistakes. Thanks - Almeda64 ( talk) 12:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
There's a sockpuppet investigation surrounding four editors of the Naagin (TV series) article, an investigation that I thought that you might be interested in due to your frequent editing of that article. The investigation can be seen here.
I hope that you will find this information to be helpful!
Noah Kastin ( talk) ( 🖋) 17:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi sir,
I am vishal lavate wikipedia user, My curiosity says why not we add some questions answer topic in wikipedia...
I have a question on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shilpa_Shinde shilpa shinde's profile
Pls provide some type of function on wikipedia I m fan of shilpa shinde, I love shilpa shinde I want to know about more Thank you c-vnl ( talk) 08:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello dear, the User talk:Sheldonlove12 is removing the whole edits of Drashti Dhami , Hina Khan and Jennifer Winget by saying that it is advertisement, he/she is new to Wikipedia and I already explained that Popularity/Impact and recognition is not about advertisements but notiable sources like Eastern Eye, Times of India, Rediff, MensXp etc are present and same thing written for others actresses like Aishwarya Rai. Please can you explane to him /her about that as he/she is new to Wikipedia. Zafar24 Talk 06:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I already talked to him/her but he/she is doing that thing again and again by giving the same reason that other articles not present that section. Zafar24 Talk 07:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks dear. The issue is solved. Zafar24 Talk 10:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi dear, can you look at this article List of concerts by Shreya Ghoshal where a editor who created the article is using bold letters in introduction. Please can you tell me that can we use bold letters in introduction in that type of article. Zafar24 Talk 10:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hii Cyphoidbomob. Why dont you create a username for me, and allow me to edit wikipedia with that username (I can provide you a scanned copy of my passport). For sincere editors such as me the "standard offer" can be skipped out. I have proved time and again how important I am to wikipedia. Wikipedia is my father. Did you notice my edits in S. S. Rajamouli. No one cares if I dont edit the article. Such is the bad condition. As a wikipedia administrator this is what you want or you want a one man army such as me. Why dont you take this issue to the arbitration committee. Juniorcyphoid ( talk) 09:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Vivek Chourasia, Vivek Chourasia vc4137 and Vc4137... how much longer should they be allowed an opportunity to respond? I think there's enough evidence for SPI now. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 17:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey there Cyphoidbomb. I have a query- you often tell users not to use subjective labels like "blockbuster" (you once told that to me too), but when featured articles like Jaws (film) do so, shouldn't it be fine as long as it is a well-sourced claim? 86.97.130.20 ( talk) 13:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
I want to ask a question. Are YouTube and Spotify are referenced for non- vocalist artists article? Thank You - Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 16:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
References
Hello administration,l need from you i.e I have to learn how to find webpage url value to add webpage as external link on Wikipedia reference so please help me to get way how to know webpage value Thank you Sri Harsha Malempati ( talk) 19:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
How to add external link how to find URL particular webpage Where will find URL. Sri Harsha Malempati ( talk) 12:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I was about to implement this edit, but this by a user made be hesitate. Krishnan is a the name of Ramya's father. Hence shouldn't be referred to as Ramya throughout the article ? Correct me if I am wrong. 86.97.129.224 ( talk) 13:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi can you please check this user's contributions as they seem problematic. They seem to be promoting an actress and actor and may also be connected to lifetime entertainment. They have created articles on an actor and actress which is ok but then they have boosted their billing positions in existing articles and created film and tv articles that misrepresent the correct billing. For example Freshwater (film) was created with the claim that Donnabella had a starring role but rotten tomatoes does not have her in the first5 and the official DVD has her at 8 and from Youtube her character is killed early on. I've reverted a number of their edits, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 18:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi user:Cyphoidbomb,
In Ishqbaaaz article, how to add an award section?
Previously, I added award section on Ishqbaaaz. But you removed. You said that the section contents meets with it own network/channel. Now the question is "How to fix it?" and "How to legally add the award section?"
Thank You, Siddiq Sazzad ( talk) 14:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb what do you mean by inappropriate for an encyclopedia? All added links were relevant to the topic. It would be great if you help me to understand what guidelines I've not followed to avoid future mistakes. Mrugeshsingh ( talk) 05:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi! How are you? I want to let you know that some anonymous users are editing the page, and most of the edits are wrong. I don't know which is the last stable version of the page, and it if I would restore someone will again edit it. I also have made a WP:RFP for the page but got no response. Some reviews for the film have been published, if the page could be protected by those users so the trusted users can easily add the reviews. Please help, Thanks! M. Billoo 19:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
How to review a common media photo? Where I will find the photo reviewers user? Specially for Pinterest photo. Please reply me.
Thank You, Siddiq Sazzad ( talk) 15:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
@ user:Cyphoidbomb How to review a photo?
Siddiq Sazzad ( talk) 16:05, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Actually, I'm a storkismist. Scientific storkism] Jim1138 ( talk) 03:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Our delivery-stork-denialist is back Sara Gilbert ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) & Linda Perry ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) different IP. I reverted and warned. On my watch-list now. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 08:22, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
I've seen you give at least a few editors a hard time and imply or claim they're "paid editors" based on the fact that there is commonality of the subject matter between articles they've edited. I notice you create and edit a lot of Indian articles. Are you a paid editor? Or otherwise compensated? Do you have a COI problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.234.100.169 ( talk) 04:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
ANI on Linda Perry and Sara Gilbert Jim1138 ( talk) 01:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Cyphoidbomb,
You made a little mistake. You added guest star members in main cast. Actually it is not you fault. First mistake has done by Anonymous User. Now I fixed that problem. Please don't ever trust Anonymous Users.
Thanks, Siddiq Sazzad ( talk) 13:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Regards, Yamaguchi先生 ( talk) 18:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
We've contacted Oshwah about this, but he seems to be very busy these days. IJBall and myself could use your input. This user has a plethora of warnings on their talk page and refuses to discuss and instead tries to silently stonewall their changes. I've reported this user either two or three times now to AIV and admins have rejected the report each time. I think an indefinite block is warranted, personally, but I'd be fine with any type of block if a block were to be placed. In any case, we're kind of at a loss on what to do now since admins don't seem to be seeing their disruptiveness. Thanks. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 20:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi, ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:201x television seasons and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:201x American television seasons continue to be problematic. ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2018 American television seasons was deleted only two days ago but it's already been recreated by an editor who clearly didn't read the inclusion criteria. I've had to empty this and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2018 television seasons, which the same editor has also recreated, several times. To avoid this happening next year, would it be possible to create protect ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2019 television seasons and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2019 American television seasons until 1 January 2019? This would be greatly appreciated. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 04:36, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Just adding that I've emptied ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2018 television seasons and ‹The template Category link is being considered for merging.› Category:2018 American television seasons and nominated them for deletion but, sadly, I fully expect them to be recreated before 2018. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 04:47, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
The question here is much more narrow though: should categories that are not empty be deleted without discussion using a tool for deleting empty categories?- The categories were empty when they were deleted.
how does the community feel about "Upcoming" cats like "Upcoming 2018 TV series"? I see lots of 2018 films (etc)- I think I raised it earlier this year but can't remember the outcome. I think it would actually be against the spirit of WP:TVUPCOMING. The other issue here is that once the seasons begin airing, typically in September/October, the seasons are no longer upcoming but they still haven't aired episodes in the year following the year in which they start airing. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 15:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
A few weeks ago he was editing as Ason271 which you blocked on October 7th. He's back with a new impersonation account - Ason20 in the same areas. Would you mind reviewing and blocking if warranted? Thanks. Ravensfire ( talk) 20:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
... claims to be an admin. Nothing to do with you, I presume? I've blocked it. Bishonen | talk 19:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC).
How do I undo bad edits by returning them to initial edits without erasing or typing all over again? Fghsfijgig ( talk) 19:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your response, its my mistake that i did not discussed it on talk page, first of all i want to clear one thing that no one is paying me to do this, Firstly i have created Wikipedia page of Director Bhaurao Karhade, as per his recent updates it looks that he decided to use his full name everywhere from now Ref - [1], [2] so as i told that i created this article firstly, so its my responsibility to update Wikipedia articles Name accordingly, so i accept my mistake that i did not discussed it before, but i want to declare that i did not created it against money, and according to me changing the persons name does not indicate that its marketing or something, and I know very well that Wikipedia is not marketing platform. wikibot 18:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(
help)
Winged Blades Godric 12:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Variations to standard offer:
The six-month threshold can be adjustable under special circumstances. If an editor shows an unusually good insight into the circumstances that led to the block, and sets out a credible proposal for how they will deal with those issues in future, then a return might be considered sooner.
On the other hand, if the indefinitely blocked/banned user continues to be especially disruptive, or has engaged in particularly serious misconduct, then some administrators may become unwilling to consider a return for a much longer time or, quite possibly, ever.
Banned users seeking a return are well-advised to make significant and useful contributions to other WMF projects prior to requesting a return to English Wikipedia per this 'offer'. Many unban requests have been declined due to the banned user simply waiting the six months out, without making any contributions to other projects.
I would like to use a committed identity..so that that you can unban me and allow me to edit wikipedia from January 2018.
I would like to attach my email ID, PAN CARD, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, AADHAR CARD, PASSPORT NUMER to user padmalakshmisx.
I am here to expand lot of articles on south cinema. I am not here to disrupt them. I have lot of information on this that other editors lack. most of these articles are edited by amateurs. I am the only experienced editor. Please give opportunity to edit.
I will not use the following in my edits:
Please dont block this username, I wish to use this to communicate with administrators such as you.
Please discuss my issue as special case with arbitration committee... Notforediting ( talk) 09:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Please check out Steve Shives Youtube page 5 things that you just can't believe for the week. The last one since the election is always "THe furthor misadventures of Lord Dampnut" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.84.167.2 ( talk) 18:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
How's it going Cyphoidbomb :) I saw something interesting that I would like to show you - [1]. Also sharing an interesting article from Mint. Let There Be Sunshine ( talk) 08:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you said the ICTF consensus is no conversions in the infobox. I find this a somewhat odd decision, since mentioning the USD amount would make more sense (especially for non-Indian readers). I'd like to understand the rationale behind this consensus. Could you maybe post a link to ICTF's consensus regarding this? Maestro2016 ( talk) 02:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Cyphoidbomb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey, look at the article history. There's a new user, Siddhant2709, that appears to have a strong COI and has made some troubling edits and edit summary. I left a pretty pointed warning on their talk page that hopefully will get them in the right direction, but I think it may bear some admin watching. I think there will be enough editorial eyes on it (I'm posting on the Indian noticeboard next), so please stay uninvolved as an editor if you can! Appreciate it. Ravensfire ( talk) 05:39, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Please need your help, see Ishqbaaaz page. I don't want to get into edit war. Thank You. JayB91 ( talk) 17:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
It looks like he's back, again. You might want to take a look at his SPI page (I've added User:Roverisk122). LightandDark2000 ( talk) 00:57, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Maybe I sounded a little annoyed, but it wasn't my intention. I'm sorry. I didn't take the remove of that part as personal, I just said it wasn't from me and that nobody reviewing the article previously had find a problem with it. I also took the opportunity to invite you to review the grammar, since I may commit some mistakes for still not having English at its most proficient level, and I don't have enough time or even patience to improve every bit, as the article is getting bigger, many of its kind seem to be kinda abandoned recently, and I'm just one person, so any help is welcome (I was actually hoping for someone to appear pointing out something wrong, 'cause I need help on reviewing). By the way, the problem there is not about grammar, as I can see, but concerning Wikipedia's policies. I'm kinda outdated about that and also don't have time to read the whole stuff again.
I purpose a partnership: review the whole article carefully and tell me about everything that's wrong concerning the policies or even grammar, and I will seek to provide sources for everything necessary.
And, please, don't threaten anonymous users saying the page is close to be protected, as you did here. I still know about the rules and remember this, although I'm obviously a veteran. I have seen many administrators committing that mistake. I know many anonymous users are vandals, but you need to have patience. And before you suggest, no, I don't want to create an account, as my only desire is to improve that single article. Nothing else, no benefits, since I prefer to not come back. 200.232.190.111 ( talk) 03:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Hi! I noticed some sources, and I wasn't sure if they were reliable. Since I thought that you probably have much more expertise in this field than I do, I wanted to ask if you could help me with this issue. Here's the relevant discussion: Talk:List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu episodes#New sources found: 12/13/17 UTC
If you could help me with this, that would be very useful!
Thanks!
Noah Kastin ( talk) ( 🖋) 07:40, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
Just replying re: this. No problem with contesting it, but PRODs are a relatively normal way we handle UPE cleanup when G5 wouldn't be appropriate, even if it slipped through the cracks when initially discovered. I've sent it to AfD as a TOU violation, but the notability question doesn't matter at all here in my view. TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
I made changes to the article removed fan stuff any more changes?? it looks neutral now-- Starunique ( talk) 11:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm working at Director SUKUMAR's office. His date of year is 1971, please correct with it.. Pavan kumar (sukumar blood fan) ( talk) 13:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018! |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!
![]() |
Merry Christmas Cyphoidbomb!!
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia!
,
–
Davey2010
Merry Xmas / Happy New Year
13:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 22:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Holidays |
From Stave one of Dickens
A Christmas Carol
So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD| Talk 00:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you Marnette! Best to you this Christmas! Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 00:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
wishing you a merry christmas and a joyful new year. :) :) Starunique ( talk) 13:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! |
Wish you a Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and prosperous New Year 2018! – GSS ( talk| c| em) 18:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC) |
Amaury ( talk | contribs) 08:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Remove Sequrity Bibhuaggarawal29 ( talk) 07:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For all the thankless edits you have been performing here while facing hostility. Thanks for everything you have been doing for WP. Happy Holidays! Yashthepunisher ( talk) 12:05, 27 December 2017 (UTC) |
vijay appeared in a short commercial video about herova? zerova? as far as i know it was just an television advertisement about educational awareness will that come under his philanthropy work section or some other section Starunique ( talk) 19:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
I am just asking that what people does in television advertisement will it come under philanthropy or the advertisement section nothing else Starunique ( talk) 09:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Amaury (
talk |
contribs)
08:28, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
You are invited to join the discussions at
Talk:Kiznaiver#Why does this series matter? and at
Talk:Kiznaiver#Episode summaries.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
06:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Please hava a look at Jaynagar I and Jaynagar II on Notice Board for India-related topics. Cheers. - Chandan Guha ( talk) 04:57, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles#Header issues.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions)
04:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
please edit wikipedia yourselfs rather than allowing users to edit and later deleating the edit claiming even ibtimes report as unreliable source .The reports edited by wikipedia admins even contains reports by blogs but when users edit with ibtimes report you are claiming that to be unreliable source. EAGLE EYE boxoffice analayser ( talk) 20:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Cyphoidbomb I assume you think I am Sahib college but I’m not I am a different user so please can you add the template tag on the bottom of Lopamudra Raut’s article please thank you User:109.152.176.247
I started a discussion about using multiple sources for film financials here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Using multiple sources for film gross figures. Your thoughts and suggestions on the best way forward would be appreciated! Ravensfire ( talk) 02:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I would appreciate your comments here as always, Cyphoidbomb. Do let me know if you are interested in leaving comments by pinging me. Thanks.
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
15:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
May all your endeavours have a fruitful beginning and prosperous ending!
—
Ssven2
Looking at you, kid
15:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Cyphoidbomb,
A user Ahmed Lutfe Inam has told me about a new Wikipedia rule that I never heard. Here is it. He told me that "I need permissions to edit his article". The page that he talk about, is not semi-protected page and I have rights of Extended confirmed user. Please explain me What I should do now. Thank You -- Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 13:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, if you guys really checked my latest article, you may have known that a reference was added by Siddiqsazzad001 which had no connection with the article. I removed it once and notified him that the source is not presenting the article. But again Siddiqsazzad001 added it. I still didn't delete it. Don' you think a false reference should be removed from Wikipedia? And as an administrator, I expected some good behavior, but didn't get it. You may me a big person, but please first check the article or ask Siddiqsazzad001 and then increase your mentality. It'll help you in the near future. Ahmed Lutfe Inam ( talk) 02:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I do understand. Pardon me because I'm new and I didn't know to discuss about it. And I am not giving anyone any warning. I'm just telling that he is adding unreliable references which is not matching the article's subject. You can check it on the references tab on Jatir Janak Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Govt. College. Ahmed Lutfe Inam ( talk) 08:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Cyphoidbomb,
I need a little help here, I just read your user page and realized that you are an administrator.
I recently created an article
Draft: Son Of Abish and awaiting for review, I want this contribution of mine to be evaluated. Earlier I had created another article
Draft: Walter Hamada it has same issue, and about a day later I found an article was already published, hence I copied the code to
Walter Hamada
Kindly consider this request.
Thanks
Sonuverse (
talk)
05:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- That should do. Sonuverse ( talk) 09:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Cyphoid, would you mind dropping in on the article for the Thirteenth Doctor. We have an IP who persists in removing sourced material; he's been reverted by three editors and is at four reverts under his current IP (about six or seven total.) I'm not sure whether a block or a page protection is the best move given he's IP hopping, but something needs to be done! He's not responding to requests to use the talk page. I appreciate your help! ----Dr.Margi ✉ 16:57, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Regarding this edit I just checked that I made a mistake in a hurry while writing about this piece of information because of some confusion regarding the Alzheimer's disease. I didn't mean to copy/paste, I just wasn't aware of what the disease is and how it led to her father's death with the whole "bodily functions" thing. Other than this minor error, I have not copied content from other sources, you can check for yourself. Also, I've inserted the information on Shinde's depression into the appropriate section. I'm new to writing articles about people so I might've made some mistakes. Thanks - Almeda64 ( talk) 12:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
There's a sockpuppet investigation surrounding four editors of the Naagin (TV series) article, an investigation that I thought that you might be interested in due to your frequent editing of that article. The investigation can be seen here.
I hope that you will find this information to be helpful!
Noah Kastin ( talk) ( 🖋) 17:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi sir,
I am vishal lavate wikipedia user, My curiosity says why not we add some questions answer topic in wikipedia...
I have a question on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shilpa_Shinde shilpa shinde's profile
Pls provide some type of function on wikipedia I m fan of shilpa shinde, I love shilpa shinde I want to know about more Thank you c-vnl ( talk) 08:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello dear, the User talk:Sheldonlove12 is removing the whole edits of Drashti Dhami , Hina Khan and Jennifer Winget by saying that it is advertisement, he/she is new to Wikipedia and I already explained that Popularity/Impact and recognition is not about advertisements but notiable sources like Eastern Eye, Times of India, Rediff, MensXp etc are present and same thing written for others actresses like Aishwarya Rai. Please can you explane to him /her about that as he/she is new to Wikipedia. Zafar24 Talk 06:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I already talked to him/her but he/she is doing that thing again and again by giving the same reason that other articles not present that section. Zafar24 Talk 07:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks dear. The issue is solved. Zafar24 Talk 10:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi dear, can you look at this article List of concerts by Shreya Ghoshal where a editor who created the article is using bold letters in introduction. Please can you tell me that can we use bold letters in introduction in that type of article. Zafar24 Talk 10:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hii Cyphoidbomob. Why dont you create a username for me, and allow me to edit wikipedia with that username (I can provide you a scanned copy of my passport). For sincere editors such as me the "standard offer" can be skipped out. I have proved time and again how important I am to wikipedia. Wikipedia is my father. Did you notice my edits in S. S. Rajamouli. No one cares if I dont edit the article. Such is the bad condition. As a wikipedia administrator this is what you want or you want a one man army such as me. Why dont you take this issue to the arbitration committee. Juniorcyphoid ( talk) 09:14, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Vivek Chourasia, Vivek Chourasia vc4137 and Vc4137... how much longer should they be allowed an opportunity to respond? I think there's enough evidence for SPI now. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 17:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey there Cyphoidbomb. I have a query- you often tell users not to use subjective labels like "blockbuster" (you once told that to me too), but when featured articles like Jaws (film) do so, shouldn't it be fine as long as it is a well-sourced claim? 86.97.130.20 ( talk) 13:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
I want to ask a question. Are YouTube and Spotify are referenced for non- vocalist artists article? Thank You - Siddiq Sazzad (Chat) 16:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)