This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
Can you keep a watch on this account/socks? He's already created one sock impersonating a notable person and I suspect the new account is his too. Loads of copyvios with exif changing and all that stuff on Commons. You may see some tell tale signs on the articles you cover related to low key south Indian cinema. cheers. — Spaceman Spiff 17:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The site is related to and probably belongs to entgroup (see the link at the top of the site). Entgroup is used as a source for Chinese box office by Variety [1]. I could use their English site [2], which is what I presume Variety uses, but since the films are Chinese, I think it's more appropriate to use the gross in the local currency and that's not available on the English site, only on cbooo.-- Cattus talk 10:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I have noticed that you have done some work over at the character page of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu. As the cast for The Lego Ninjago Movie has been announced, should we add the confirmed roles to the character page just like if anyone is to add who voiced the characters that appeared in Lego Dimensions? -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 16:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Dang I guess I figured it wouldn't harm anything to include a film in 'preceded by' if there wasn't any appropriate TV series to put there. Even if it was allowed I guess it could get cluttered since every single film a princess was in who appeared could then qualify and it'd be like a dozen lines long. If anything were to qualify I think it would be Sleeping Beauty since Flaura/Fauna/Merryweather are recurring cast members and not 1-shot guests summoned from who-knows-where like the princesses are. I figure Elena of Avalor qualifies in 'followed by' since it's a spin-off. Chronologically speaking I am not entirely sure where this story takes place in respect to Sofia, it might actually be a prequel. I don't recall much about the 'Amulet of Avalor' or what was mentioned of Elena in St1. I figure 'followed by' meant by our timeline though not the in-show timeline. Ranze ( talk) 12:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
CB as a heads up, I'm watching the summary at the start of Elena of Avalor right now, and it makes it very clear that this happens after the upcoming Sofia the First TV-film "Elena and the Secret of Avalor", so I think that supports a definite preceded/succeeded Sofia/Elena relationship. Even if Sofia keeps airing, it's had 3 whole seasons before this and all of those events precede freeing Elena from the Avalor amulet. Any objections to changing related back to pre/suc? Ranze ( talk) 20:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
As I had vowed to do yesterday, I had started the discussion on the talk page of List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu characters for the voice actors in other Lego Ninjago projects if you would like to get involved with the discussion. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 16:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
It may be more effective for the process to add your statement in the opening statements section and add a very short reply to the moderator's questions. I haven't been involved in a DRN before so the process is interesting seeing how one is done. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 17:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent comments about Sage of the Six Paths. I have unblocked the account. Unfortunately, experience shows that in cases like this very often the block is back in place soon, but it is far from unknown for an editor to genuinely change, and giving them a chance to do so usually doesn't cost much, as a re-block is easy to do. Well. we'll see how it goes. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 13:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Why did u block me for a week! How am I distrubtive editing! It's doesn't mean that am the last person who edited means am the one who did that change! And am adding and taking away simple things NOT BIG THINGS! Before you come and see what am doing, go see other series/actors/singers etc. Wikipedia and fix them! You know I don't fix them because am NOT SURE of the informations because I DON'T WANT to put FAKE information! Roseness 12 ( talk) 20:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi sir. I saw User:Vibhss updated box office figures of film PK from Rs.741 crore to Rs.792 crore citing an article published by Koimoi as source. But that's not considered a reliable source as per WP:ICTF but The Indian Express is a reliable and trusted source as per WP:ICTF. A recently published article by this site supports 792 crore figures. I have updated the figures again as per this source. [1] You can find many articles supporting these figures. International Business Times (another "reliable" source as per WP:ICTF) too supports these figures. [2] In both sources, you will have to read thoroughly. I think now these figures are supported by good sources and clearly are in accordance with Wikipedia and WP:ICTF. What do you say ? (Please don't say, these are news articles related to another movie "Sultan", since the source supporting 741 crore figures too wasn't centred only on PK.) Besides, all my sources mention the top players with their earnings. Regards. Digangana ( talk) 14:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
References
Happy anniversary Cyphoidbomb! Many more happy years ahead for you!! Audit Guy ( talk) 03:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
I don't why was his account was blocked, but the user has done some constructive edits in some articles like List of Black Butler chapters. So even if he is blocked again, please leave some articles intact. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 19:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
"I didn't know cause I don't use Cruchyroll since they charge."So you mean to tell me that you wrote that plot summary from scratch in your own words, and just by sheer coincidence it appears at Crunchyroll? And the excessively detailed plot summary that you wrote entirely from scratch for Naruto, that appears at Wikia as a matter of coincidence as well? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 01:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
[11] The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
What do you think about these website? Do you think they pass WP:RS? I strongly believe they do, given that the former won the "News Start-Up of the Year"’ award and there is no-one questioning its credibility. The latter's editor-in-chief is Chitra Subramaniam (formerly from The Hindu; known for her investigation of the Bofors scandal). Kailash29792 ( talk) 06:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
You may take a look at this investigation. You are also indirectly part of this discussion. Inside the Valley ( talk) 16:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Seems a bunch of Muppet-related articles are still overlinked (e.g.: Animal). I'd fix them but I'm much too busy. – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 17:03, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
As per Wikipedia:Wikipuffery, it clearly states that such type of words used in main lead section of article Mohanlal are not allowed. So i reverted the edits and made it to neutral point of view. As i am new to wiki so many users are reverting my edits. Need help. I think what i have done is correct. Can you pls check into the matter as the one who reverting my edits clearly states in his bio as a fan of that actor. He is making it as a fan page. Pls help. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambeinghari ( talk • contribs) 13:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
SUPPORTING CAST ADDITIONAL CAST ITS THE SANE FREAKING THING MOST PEOPLE PUT ADDITIONAL SO THATS WHY GOSH Roseness 12 ( talk) 03:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Actually I don't need help but didn't know what topic name to put anyways GO look at "Shakti Astitva Ke Ehsaas Ki" wiki someone removed the "PLOT" so why won't u go talk to that person and tell them why AND LOOK AM THE LAST ONE WHO EDITED BECAUSE I CHANGED THE NUM OF SEASONS FROM 1 to 01 so DONT THINK THAT AM THE ONE who did IT Roseness 12 ( talk) 03:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
And changed other things too because PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND but I did not remove the Plot just telling u so u don't go crazy on me and say I did this and I did that! 😒 Roseness 12 ( talk) 03:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Pearll's Sun TALK 15:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
I point out the matter on talk page about koimoi and boxofficeindia sources. Pls check it out. One user said to use boxoffice india figures instead of koimoi. Can i revet your edits. Your opinion?? Or change only koimoi sources with boxoffice india?? Ambeinghari ( talk) 06:01, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Ok am holding off. Where should i open a discussion about it? On WT: ICTF? Can you help Ambeinghari ( talk) 06:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Already opened a discussion on talk page. Thanks for the help and your opinions too needed. And will paste a link to WT:ICTF. Regards Ambeinghari ( talk) 06:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Not too many regulars at WikiProject Film are willing to spend the time necessary to keep Indian films policy compliant. Thanks for all your work. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 05:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of highest-grossing Tamil films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Atlee and Ayan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, more drama. Background: After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimy in a Cage, Aimy in a Cage was moved to draft space. Later, the article's creator requested assistance at the help desk or tea house (I forget; it's been months). I expanded the article and added several sources, recommending that it be moved back to mainspace now that it satisfies WP:NFILM. I never watchlisted the article, and I didn't bother to keep track of it afterward. Directly after my edits, an IP editor blanked a negative review and replaced it with a positive one, also removing the Rotten Tomatoes "average rating". The positive review was from Urban Cinephile and was unsourced. You'll note that the URL still goes to starburstmagazine.com.
A few days ago, I came upon this article again and noticed the IP editor's disruptive edits. I
restored the negative review and RT "average rating", noting that the Urban Cinephile review was both unsourced and likely unreliable. At any rate, it was an unsourced review that was replacing one that was unambiguously reliable –
Starburst is a well-respected British magazine. Several days later,
Vvvyzooo (
talk ·
contribs), a
single-purpose account, came to the article to
once again remove the Starburst review and the RT "average rating", replacing it with the unsourced Urban Cinephile review. Note that the URL for the Urban Cinephile review is still the starburstmagazine.com URL. I
reverted this edit, becoming increasingly irritable about the situation, and
left a warning for blanking. Vvvyzooo then
blanked the Starburst review and RT "average rating" once again, though he finally cited the Urban Cinephile review with a URL in the edit summary. Looking at the site, it is as I suspected: some guy's self-published blog. Even if this site is found reliable by consensus, there's still the issue of repeated blanking of a negative review from a respected source. I suspect that this person has an undisclosed financial
conflict-of-interest based on
this edit to my talk page, which says, "Your edits are incredibly bias and hurting people.
" Can you semi-protect
Aimy in a Cage for a brief period of time? I don't want to deal the film's producers edit warring with me on this article to remove negative reviews and a RT rating they think is unfair. I've got enough to deal with as-is.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 18:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Wow, it's like you read my mind, I was just about to set up ClueBot III archiving for the talk page. :P nyuszika7h ( talk) 18:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello C. I hope you are well. Thanks for your edit summary on the LTA page. Whether they are the same person in the LTA page or not 131.156.140.62 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) is still overlinking (IMO massively} items on numerous articles. They have been warned about it. Do you think they should be reported at AIV? Or somewhere else? I wanted to get your input before proceeding with any reports. I hope that you have an enjoyable weekend. MarnetteD| Talk 19:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
...consider my request here? FrB.TG ( talk) 10:53, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi dear, @ Cyphoidbomb: Even Music directors believes that professional singers cannot sing all or multiple genres, thats why Shekhar Ravjiani also said this thing about Shreya Ghoshal. Read this https://www.quora.com/Can-professional-singers-sing-all-or-multiple-genres And the thing is that you cannot undo my edits with good faith and 100 percent reliable source. Music Lover knows that what is meant by all kinds of songs, means, Shreya Ghoshal has sung all kinds of songs like fast songs called "Chikini Chammeli", "Thumka" etc, romantic song like "Teri Ore" etc, sad song like "Sun Raha Hea Na Tu" etc. Dear you are wrong that professional singers can sing all types of songs. If that was true then why music directors talk many singers for one movie? In a movie there are more than one singer because all singers cannot sing all types of songs. Zafar24 Talk 00:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Music director Shekhar Ravjiani praised Ghoshal for her singing versatility. He noted in an interview with Times of India, "Some say that if you are trained in a specific genre, then you should sing songs belonging to that only. But I have friends in the industry [like Ghoshal] who sing all types of songs."
Dear @ Cyphoidbomb: I was saying thing in the wrong way. I was missing out the "versatility thing". But you should not undo things quickly but correct the thing if possible. And by the way, dear, you said, "You might as well say "According to the music director Shekhar Ravjiani, Ghoshal looks good in a hat." That was a GOOD JOKE but not applies on ME. I always take care of Shreya Ghoshal's page and contributes a lot and I always EDITS with sources and references. Zafar24 Talk 00:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Dear @ Cyphoidbomb: Okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zafar24 ( talk • contribs)
Hello Cyphoidbomb. Regarding this recent block, I see to have this IP's page on my watchlist, and I'm wondering if you would consider three or six months? It looks like he is restarting the same type of disruption for which he was previously blocked. So it's hard to AGF that he will soon return to normal editing. I would suggest six months, with a willingness to consider credible appeals if he wants to change his approach. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 00:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
|preceded_by=
and |followed_by=
, Incorrect use of
pseudo-headings instead of L3 headings, were created by a user Arnav19. (
This one, for instance). I made contact with him and let him know about the problems and he seemed amenable to fixing them (although I have yet to notice the progress) but I wonder if he didn't inadvertently create an article template that is now being adhered to religiously. On the other hand, maybe he just copied existing problems himself. Might just be a coincidence--I don't have any reason to believe that he is involved in perpetuating the problem, but it was an odd discovery. Since the IP editor hasn't spoken in a coherent way (nor did Roseness), I have no idea what their mental agenda is. Do they actually think 01 is an improvement over 1 or are they just being antagonistic? No idea.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 01:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Hi, so you have blocked me for 2 weeks just because I put 01 instead of 1, look I want to tell you something. Before, I used to put 1 but then people kept on editing it and putting 01 so I didn't bothered anymore and thought that we should put 01 instead of 1 so that's why, I put 01 the last time. You have blocked me for this thing without letting me tell you how come I did it! Roseness 12 ( talk) 08:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
? Roseness 12 ( talk) 08:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry I don't know what's happening with this that u have warned me before but ok I want to tell u that I swear to god that I haven't added a anything related to 1 or 01, the block that u blocked me for 2 weeks I haven't changed anything related to 01 and also I didn't know that the main cast and recurring cast have to be in different levels but it just looks too much anyways for the" former cast", we have to add former cast so people can know that they are no longer acting pls understand me for at least once and stop being so stricted with me pls! Roseness 12 ( talk) 20:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Just to add, I had observed them way back in March trying to sneak in articles. I got tangled up in other stuff and left it. I believe they are using multiple accounts - more than the ones currently at SPI. I will try listing them soon, maybe at COIN. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 08:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb. I've read your message. The Start date parameter on the episode table is truly necessary, because it's present in every Wikipedia's list of episodes for every TV live-action or animated series. Luigi1090 ( talk) 23:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
You have a Message at here. Thank you. Wrzzer ( talk) 11:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
All of these articles have been subject to financial vandalism for a while. Can you protect all of them for a longer duration if possible.
Regards. - Managerarc™ talk
I am not cherrypicking reviews. The film has been universally panned by critics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tridib 626 ( talk • contribs) 18:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
What's so great about someone else's personal analysis? Get a life. Stop sitting around spending all your time on Wikipedia. You have no identity in the real world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tridib 626 ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
Just wanted to let you know that this IP has continued their disruptive behavior after your previous block. Further administrative action may need to be taken here... Regards— MeowMoon ( talk) 23:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brothers (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please delete oh jaanewale tujhko Womans day special , as that was a wrong info. She was supposed to sing that but she has not sung that song. She sang Shurodhwani Bengali album in 2014. Mayuresh20 ( talk) 04:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
It's my own work (my own written piece) which I have written as a summary of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? And I had pasted on one website called India forums My username in India Forums is -Dellz - and it's my own work not copyrighted or plagiarized . So please allow me to post my own summary of the serial — Preceding unsigned comment added by DellzCreationz ( talk • contribs) 15:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello ,am Lazychick.maria from India Forums and my friend Dellz is the holder of it ,it's her summary.Mine it's just the banner I mean the pictures but its her work not my work .Am not the owner of it . Please don't involve me into this .Dellz my friend complained me about this and I was shocked seeing me getting involved when I didn't write anything . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweet.chocolate. ( talk • contribs) 08:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kichappan has released his new version, Sauerstoffliebe. Back in Janatha Garage, re-ordering cast in favour of Mohanlal and has added a poster featuring Mohanlal. Not enough evidences for submitting a report. That's why I need your help.-- Charles Turing ( talk) 15:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Given the history and immediate jumping to another IP that has also been blocked for this same editorial and tag-teaming, I extended your block. Geographically close but netblock far, so we can't rangeblock:( DMacks ( talk) 21:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Do a collapsible list should be added in the template or infobox of an album-based article or should be removed? Because I didn't read anything in the Wikipedia guidelines if is appropriate to add a collapsible list in the template. I believe a collapsible list should only be used in the track listings, only if there are bonus tracks. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 19:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello. You have speedy deleted G5 this article, although G5 states "This applies to pages ... that have no substantial edits by others." I am fairly certain that I contributed more than 50% of this article. So can you please undelete it? Thanks and regards, Biwom ( talk) 10:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I saw your revert of LDMaster1998's edit on Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!, as I have been following both that page and that user since they've been adding hoax airdates to that particular article and others for a while now. I thought it might help/interest you to know that he has also used/is using IP 108.29.11.192 to make the same vandalistic edit to Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! and is vandalizing other pages using that IP as well. Not sure if that's useful/helpful to you at all, but I thought I should mention it as it appears you've been following this user as well for some time now. Cheers, Katniss ♥ 21:18, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Cyphoidbomb,
I have added new published sources as references for the "Early Life" section of
Priyadarshini Chatterjee which you deleted for having blogs as references. I have added new published sources as references to it. But I am unable to post it in the article as it appears to be blocked. Please revert the blocking so that I can add this to the article....and you can cross check it.
CyberBrinda ( talk) 01:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry please can you tell me to how we can fix template because I'm new to Wikipedia i don't know what to fix and what not Parth1243 ( talk) 03:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps this is helpful for your recent SPI-request: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrdhimas/Archive The Banner talk 20:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
In these edits [12] [13] you removed a "Shitload" of boldface and italic formatting from the article. Someone have gone overboard with the emphasis and much of what was bolded and italicized should not have been. The only reason you found the page is because I had edited it last time. You should know that there were a "Shitload" of bold face and italics in that same page for many, many years. But you never knew about it, when I edited something, you found the faults.
You removed some sentences [14] [15] in the page Priyadarshini Chatterjee as you mentioned I have used blogs as references. Instead of removing the whole lot. You could have added "citation needed" to some sentences. But you deleted the entire paragraph. CyberBrinda [[[User:Parth1243|Parth1243]] ( talk) 03:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes it's my previous account please unblock I will follow the rules of Wikipedia and fix templates please unblock it widr has blocked IT Parth1243 ( talk) 07:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Why you blocked me 103.57.214.105 ( talk) 08:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello there. We all know that Finding Dory is a sequel to Finding Nemo because the events of the film take place after those of the latter. It seems possible that Finding Dory is also a spin-off of Finding Nemo because it centers on Dory who is not the main character of the first film. What do you think? 63.173.125.137 ( talk) 16:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
It's a very common phenomenon among entertainment articles that editors who only understand terms in context mis-apply them. (Don't get me started on what they do with also starring.) You might be able to make an argument for the Minions example, but that doesn't mean every film that features a character from another is a spin-off. It's a TV term. The media surrounding Finding Dory consistently referred to it as a sequel. If there's no reliable source that Andrew Stanton, the production company and the studio see it as a spin-off, the term is mis-applied. -- Drmargi ( talk) 22:49, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Not sure if it tingled your spidey senses but 5 minutes after Widr blocked the IP, Sarveshjoshi42 made the same edits, so it looks like block evasion. I notice that Sarveshjoshi42 has edited other articles in the same address pool as the IP. I've also mentioned this on Widr's talk page. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 21:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
When you're bored, have a look at the recent edits to List of The 100 episodes. I'm assuming it's the same editor, and he/she has made 78 edits to the article in less than 24 hours. So many edits, so little information. My watchlist went crazy. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 21:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Do you know if it's possible to change the phrasing of the tooltip, specifically after the contributions link? It's a bit confusing for me—like, I know and can figure it out eventually, but yeah, it's still a bit confusing. So instead of what's shown in the screenshot here, something like, "...blocked for 30 days by Widr - 3 minutes ago." It's mostly the "0:00 ago" that throws me off; everything else doesn't, really, I just think it looks better spelled out. Thanks in advance! Amaury ( talk | contribs) 16:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb, I need some help. I'm dealing with a user ( Honestmedia) who is inserting content that is WP:UNSOURCED (see Lester Holt and Martha Raddatz). I've tried explaining multiple times, along with another user ( UCO2009bluejay), that it must be cited. He is inserting the Holt is a Democrat, but according to the records (which he stated is where he's received his information), which also had to be pointed out by UCO2009bluejay in this edit, Holt is a Republican. Right now it isn't as to whether it is verifiable or not, it's a matter of whether or not Holt's a Democrat, which obviously he isn't (as shown in the link that has been provided to him). I know I've violated the 3RR, and I am done with editing for at least a day on the article, but after several attempts of trying to tell the other user that the content needed a reliable source in the article, he's still refusing to do so. Maybe you can get it through to their head or do something else; I don't know, but this is getting tiring. Thanks, Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 19:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
This issue appears to be about what constitutes a sufficient reference. Please consider this example to see my reasoning: If a page was about global warming, and I submitted content pointing out that "...according to public records which are kept by NOAA, the average ocean temperature went up by 1 degree in 2015." In that submission, the reference source is shown, and since it is public record it can be verified, and the source is on the page as an in-line attribution.
It appears from your talk message to me that if any user challenged that reference, even without first bothering to confirm it on his own, then a link to the specific NOAA document in which that statement can be seen must be included--or the statement must be deleted.
Wouldn't such a rule easily be abused by a user who could then go through any page in Wikipedia and challenge every statement appearing without a link? All any user would have to do to bring Wikipedia to a grinding halt, is to challenge every statement on any page--even including those with stated references that can be verified--without ever even having to do some research to confirm them on his own.
Looking at the Lester Holt and Martha Raddatz pages for example, this user who is engaging in a editing war with me could just as easily challenge all of the many, many statements in those pages that appear without a link or even a reference. The effect would be to shut down those pages or at least gut them by removing most of the information in them. Honestmedia ( talk) 03:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
plz tell me how can I add the naagin season 2 story plot properly thanks Kasamterepyar ki ( talk) 18:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Kasamterepyar ki ( talk) 18:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
As predicted, more sockpuppetry from Vicky12333. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 02:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
And change in "Ek That Tiger" was a typing error.
Hemant Dabral Talk 00:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
It's not about ethnic war or anything else. It's what the factual referrece says in the cited website. I just added the figure shown on the weblink.
Hemant Dabral Talk 00:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
It's ok, I'm not editing it anymore. I don't want any troubles. I'll edit only if I see grammatical errors. Just minor edits. I don't want to start edit wars.
Hemant Dabral Talk 02:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Cyphoidbomb. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review
the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'
mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Darth Vader#Appearances section. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 17:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
OK, now we have multiple WP:RSs to support the fact that Trump claimed Lester Holt is a Democrat and news media report that he is a registered Republican. But one editor still reverted it, apparently based on reasons that don't comply with Wikipedia guidelines and policies, and I don't want to get into an edit war. Could you take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Lester_Holt&type=revision&diff=741050538&oldid=741050489 and /info/en/?search=Talk:Lester_Holt#Which_side_is_he_on.3F_Who_cares. and tell us in the Talk page what Wikipedia policy says we should do? -- Nbauman ( talk) 22:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I just wanted to bring to your attention that LDMaster1998 is doing the exact same thing again that you blocked him for a few weeks ago. Would suggest maybe an indef, since he seems to have learned absolutely nothing from his block? Cheers, Katniss ♥ 14:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you please check out this editor User:Zainlatif12 as they have been removing genuine references and replacing them with spam links to an irrevelant song lyrics site, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 14:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Pearll's Sun TALK 20:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
NIKE 01 is vandalising Allu Arjun 's films. He deleted many sources for Sarrainodu in the past. He is doing the same for Duvvada Jagannadham. PhysicsScientist ( talk) 16:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Just want you to know that a few small changes will be implement to MOS:TV, based on the most recent rewrite discussion, in case you would like to voice any opinions regarding them before they are implemented. Once those are done, the next section to cover will be the first "Image" section, with the first "Lead" section and everyone's favorite topic, "Plot", on deck. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey, Cyphoidbomb, have you ever considered being a bareucrat? Foxnpichu ( talk) 19:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb! I can you block this article from other users (including me) to move the article without permission at WP:RM/TR, and only allowed administrators to move the page. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 18:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Could you also tag this (already blocked) account once you get the chance? I'm assuming the master is obvious by now... 2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54 ( talk) 01:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
It's a different thing here on Philippine TV. We don't usually have that 'season' thing. So we group episodes by months or by book number. Just like the other LoE articles of Philippine TV. You can just go here to find out the difference. /info/en/?search=Category:Lists_of_Philippine_television_series_episodes. Philippine TV has its own format of LoE and does not follow US style. Hope it's clear! Thanks! Leo kingston ( talk) 05:00, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Looks like the user, Viper18184, you blocked for vandalism has created another account, Randyortan12 [17].-- Charles Turing ( talk) 09:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
Can you keep a watch on this account/socks? He's already created one sock impersonating a notable person and I suspect the new account is his too. Loads of copyvios with exif changing and all that stuff on Commons. You may see some tell tale signs on the articles you cover related to low key south Indian cinema. cheers. — Spaceman Spiff 17:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The site is related to and probably belongs to entgroup (see the link at the top of the site). Entgroup is used as a source for Chinese box office by Variety [1]. I could use their English site [2], which is what I presume Variety uses, but since the films are Chinese, I think it's more appropriate to use the gross in the local currency and that's not available on the English site, only on cbooo.-- Cattus talk 10:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I have noticed that you have done some work over at the character page of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu. As the cast for The Lego Ninjago Movie has been announced, should we add the confirmed roles to the character page just like if anyone is to add who voiced the characters that appeared in Lego Dimensions? -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 16:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Dang I guess I figured it wouldn't harm anything to include a film in 'preceded by' if there wasn't any appropriate TV series to put there. Even if it was allowed I guess it could get cluttered since every single film a princess was in who appeared could then qualify and it'd be like a dozen lines long. If anything were to qualify I think it would be Sleeping Beauty since Flaura/Fauna/Merryweather are recurring cast members and not 1-shot guests summoned from who-knows-where like the princesses are. I figure Elena of Avalor qualifies in 'followed by' since it's a spin-off. Chronologically speaking I am not entirely sure where this story takes place in respect to Sofia, it might actually be a prequel. I don't recall much about the 'Amulet of Avalor' or what was mentioned of Elena in St1. I figure 'followed by' meant by our timeline though not the in-show timeline. Ranze ( talk) 12:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
CB as a heads up, I'm watching the summary at the start of Elena of Avalor right now, and it makes it very clear that this happens after the upcoming Sofia the First TV-film "Elena and the Secret of Avalor", so I think that supports a definite preceded/succeeded Sofia/Elena relationship. Even if Sofia keeps airing, it's had 3 whole seasons before this and all of those events precede freeing Elena from the Avalor amulet. Any objections to changing related back to pre/suc? Ranze ( talk) 20:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
As I had vowed to do yesterday, I had started the discussion on the talk page of List of Lego Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu characters for the voice actors in other Lego Ninjago projects if you would like to get involved with the discussion. -- Rtkat3 ( talk) 16:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
It may be more effective for the process to add your statement in the opening statements section and add a very short reply to the moderator's questions. I haven't been involved in a DRN before so the process is interesting seeing how one is done. Geraldo Perez ( talk) 17:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent comments about Sage of the Six Paths. I have unblocked the account. Unfortunately, experience shows that in cases like this very often the block is back in place soon, but it is far from unknown for an editor to genuinely change, and giving them a chance to do so usually doesn't cost much, as a re-block is easy to do. Well. we'll see how it goes. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 13:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Why did u block me for a week! How am I distrubtive editing! It's doesn't mean that am the last person who edited means am the one who did that change! And am adding and taking away simple things NOT BIG THINGS! Before you come and see what am doing, go see other series/actors/singers etc. Wikipedia and fix them! You know I don't fix them because am NOT SURE of the informations because I DON'T WANT to put FAKE information! Roseness 12 ( talk) 20:04, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi sir. I saw User:Vibhss updated box office figures of film PK from Rs.741 crore to Rs.792 crore citing an article published by Koimoi as source. But that's not considered a reliable source as per WP:ICTF but The Indian Express is a reliable and trusted source as per WP:ICTF. A recently published article by this site supports 792 crore figures. I have updated the figures again as per this source. [1] You can find many articles supporting these figures. International Business Times (another "reliable" source as per WP:ICTF) too supports these figures. [2] In both sources, you will have to read thoroughly. I think now these figures are supported by good sources and clearly are in accordance with Wikipedia and WP:ICTF. What do you say ? (Please don't say, these are news articles related to another movie "Sultan", since the source supporting 741 crore figures too wasn't centred only on PK.) Besides, all my sources mention the top players with their earnings. Regards. Digangana ( talk) 14:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
References
Happy anniversary Cyphoidbomb! Many more happy years ahead for you!! Audit Guy ( talk) 03:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
I don't why was his account was blocked, but the user has done some constructive edits in some articles like List of Black Butler chapters. So even if he is blocked again, please leave some articles intact. Regards. Tintor2 ( talk) 19:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
"I didn't know cause I don't use Cruchyroll since they charge."So you mean to tell me that you wrote that plot summary from scratch in your own words, and just by sheer coincidence it appears at Crunchyroll? And the excessively detailed plot summary that you wrote entirely from scratch for Naruto, that appears at Wikia as a matter of coincidence as well? Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 01:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
[11] The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 20:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
What do you think about these website? Do you think they pass WP:RS? I strongly believe they do, given that the former won the "News Start-Up of the Year"’ award and there is no-one questioning its credibility. The latter's editor-in-chief is Chitra Subramaniam (formerly from The Hindu; known for her investigation of the Bofors scandal). Kailash29792 ( talk) 06:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
You may take a look at this investigation. You are also indirectly part of this discussion. Inside the Valley ( talk) 16:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Seems a bunch of Muppet-related articles are still overlinked (e.g.: Animal). I'd fix them but I'm much too busy. – Skywatcher68 ( talk) 17:03, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
As per Wikipedia:Wikipuffery, it clearly states that such type of words used in main lead section of article Mohanlal are not allowed. So i reverted the edits and made it to neutral point of view. As i am new to wiki so many users are reverting my edits. Need help. I think what i have done is correct. Can you pls check into the matter as the one who reverting my edits clearly states in his bio as a fan of that actor. He is making it as a fan page. Pls help. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambeinghari ( talk • contribs) 13:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
SUPPORTING CAST ADDITIONAL CAST ITS THE SANE FREAKING THING MOST PEOPLE PUT ADDITIONAL SO THATS WHY GOSH Roseness 12 ( talk) 03:11, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Actually I don't need help but didn't know what topic name to put anyways GO look at "Shakti Astitva Ke Ehsaas Ki" wiki someone removed the "PLOT" so why won't u go talk to that person and tell them why AND LOOK AM THE LAST ONE WHO EDITED BECAUSE I CHANGED THE NUM OF SEASONS FROM 1 to 01 so DONT THINK THAT AM THE ONE who did IT Roseness 12 ( talk) 03:18, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
And changed other things too because PEOPLE DONT UNDERSTAND but I did not remove the Plot just telling u so u don't go crazy on me and say I did this and I did that! 😒 Roseness 12 ( talk) 03:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Pearll's Sun TALK 15:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
I point out the matter on talk page about koimoi and boxofficeindia sources. Pls check it out. One user said to use boxoffice india figures instead of koimoi. Can i revet your edits. Your opinion?? Or change only koimoi sources with boxoffice india?? Ambeinghari ( talk) 06:01, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Ok am holding off. Where should i open a discussion about it? On WT: ICTF? Can you help Ambeinghari ( talk) 06:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Already opened a discussion on talk page. Thanks for the help and your opinions too needed. And will paste a link to WT:ICTF. Regards Ambeinghari ( talk) 06:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Not too many regulars at WikiProject Film are willing to spend the time necessary to keep Indian films policy compliant. Thanks for all your work. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 05:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of highest-grossing Tamil films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Atlee and Ayan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, more drama. Background: After Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimy in a Cage, Aimy in a Cage was moved to draft space. Later, the article's creator requested assistance at the help desk or tea house (I forget; it's been months). I expanded the article and added several sources, recommending that it be moved back to mainspace now that it satisfies WP:NFILM. I never watchlisted the article, and I didn't bother to keep track of it afterward. Directly after my edits, an IP editor blanked a negative review and replaced it with a positive one, also removing the Rotten Tomatoes "average rating". The positive review was from Urban Cinephile and was unsourced. You'll note that the URL still goes to starburstmagazine.com.
A few days ago, I came upon this article again and noticed the IP editor's disruptive edits. I
restored the negative review and RT "average rating", noting that the Urban Cinephile review was both unsourced and likely unreliable. At any rate, it was an unsourced review that was replacing one that was unambiguously reliable –
Starburst is a well-respected British magazine. Several days later,
Vvvyzooo (
talk ·
contribs), a
single-purpose account, came to the article to
once again remove the Starburst review and the RT "average rating", replacing it with the unsourced Urban Cinephile review. Note that the URL for the Urban Cinephile review is still the starburstmagazine.com URL. I
reverted this edit, becoming increasingly irritable about the situation, and
left a warning for blanking. Vvvyzooo then
blanked the Starburst review and RT "average rating" once again, though he finally cited the Urban Cinephile review with a URL in the edit summary. Looking at the site, it is as I suspected: some guy's self-published blog. Even if this site is found reliable by consensus, there's still the issue of repeated blanking of a negative review from a respected source. I suspect that this person has an undisclosed financial
conflict-of-interest based on
this edit to my talk page, which says, "Your edits are incredibly bias and hurting people.
" Can you semi-protect
Aimy in a Cage for a brief period of time? I don't want to deal the film's producers edit warring with me on this article to remove negative reviews and a RT rating they think is unfair. I've got enough to deal with as-is.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk) 18:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Wow, it's like you read my mind, I was just about to set up ClueBot III archiving for the talk page. :P nyuszika7h ( talk) 18:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello C. I hope you are well. Thanks for your edit summary on the LTA page. Whether they are the same person in the LTA page or not 131.156.140.62 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) is still overlinking (IMO massively} items on numerous articles. They have been warned about it. Do you think they should be reported at AIV? Or somewhere else? I wanted to get your input before proceeding with any reports. I hope that you have an enjoyable weekend. MarnetteD| Talk 19:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
...consider my request here? FrB.TG ( talk) 10:53, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi dear, @ Cyphoidbomb: Even Music directors believes that professional singers cannot sing all or multiple genres, thats why Shekhar Ravjiani also said this thing about Shreya Ghoshal. Read this https://www.quora.com/Can-professional-singers-sing-all-or-multiple-genres And the thing is that you cannot undo my edits with good faith and 100 percent reliable source. Music Lover knows that what is meant by all kinds of songs, means, Shreya Ghoshal has sung all kinds of songs like fast songs called "Chikini Chammeli", "Thumka" etc, romantic song like "Teri Ore" etc, sad song like "Sun Raha Hea Na Tu" etc. Dear you are wrong that professional singers can sing all types of songs. If that was true then why music directors talk many singers for one movie? In a movie there are more than one singer because all singers cannot sing all types of songs. Zafar24 Talk 00:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Music director Shekhar Ravjiani praised Ghoshal for her singing versatility. He noted in an interview with Times of India, "Some say that if you are trained in a specific genre, then you should sing songs belonging to that only. But I have friends in the industry [like Ghoshal] who sing all types of songs."
Dear @ Cyphoidbomb: I was saying thing in the wrong way. I was missing out the "versatility thing". But you should not undo things quickly but correct the thing if possible. And by the way, dear, you said, "You might as well say "According to the music director Shekhar Ravjiani, Ghoshal looks good in a hat." That was a GOOD JOKE but not applies on ME. I always take care of Shreya Ghoshal's page and contributes a lot and I always EDITS with sources and references. Zafar24 Talk 00:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Dear @ Cyphoidbomb: Okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zafar24 ( talk • contribs)
Hello Cyphoidbomb. Regarding this recent block, I see to have this IP's page on my watchlist, and I'm wondering if you would consider three or six months? It looks like he is restarting the same type of disruption for which he was previously blocked. So it's hard to AGF that he will soon return to normal editing. I would suggest six months, with a willingness to consider credible appeals if he wants to change his approach. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 00:04, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
|preceded_by=
and |followed_by=
, Incorrect use of
pseudo-headings instead of L3 headings, were created by a user Arnav19. (
This one, for instance). I made contact with him and let him know about the problems and he seemed amenable to fixing them (although I have yet to notice the progress) but I wonder if he didn't inadvertently create an article template that is now being adhered to religiously. On the other hand, maybe he just copied existing problems himself. Might just be a coincidence--I don't have any reason to believe that he is involved in perpetuating the problem, but it was an odd discovery. Since the IP editor hasn't spoken in a coherent way (nor did Roseness), I have no idea what their mental agenda is. Do they actually think 01 is an improvement over 1 or are they just being antagonistic? No idea.
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 01:36, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Hi, so you have blocked me for 2 weeks just because I put 01 instead of 1, look I want to tell you something. Before, I used to put 1 but then people kept on editing it and putting 01 so I didn't bothered anymore and thought that we should put 01 instead of 1 so that's why, I put 01 the last time. You have blocked me for this thing without letting me tell you how come I did it! Roseness 12 ( talk) 08:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
? Roseness 12 ( talk) 08:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
I am sorry I don't know what's happening with this that u have warned me before but ok I want to tell u that I swear to god that I haven't added a anything related to 1 or 01, the block that u blocked me for 2 weeks I haven't changed anything related to 01 and also I didn't know that the main cast and recurring cast have to be in different levels but it just looks too much anyways for the" former cast", we have to add former cast so people can know that they are no longer acting pls understand me for at least once and stop being so stricted with me pls! Roseness 12 ( talk) 20:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Just to add, I had observed them way back in March trying to sneak in articles. I got tangled up in other stuff and left it. I believe they are using multiple accounts - more than the ones currently at SPI. I will try listing them soon, maybe at COIN. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 08:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb. I've read your message. The Start date parameter on the episode table is truly necessary, because it's present in every Wikipedia's list of episodes for every TV live-action or animated series. Luigi1090 ( talk) 23:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
You have a Message at here. Thank you. Wrzzer ( talk) 11:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
All of these articles have been subject to financial vandalism for a while. Can you protect all of them for a longer duration if possible.
Regards. - Managerarc™ talk
I am not cherrypicking reviews. The film has been universally panned by critics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tridib 626 ( talk • contribs) 18:46, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
What's so great about someone else's personal analysis? Get a life. Stop sitting around spending all your time on Wikipedia. You have no identity in the real world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tridib 626 ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb,
Just wanted to let you know that this IP has continued their disruptive behavior after your previous block. Further administrative action may need to be taken here... Regards— MeowMoon ( talk) 23:26, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brothers (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Could you please delete oh jaanewale tujhko Womans day special , as that was a wrong info. She was supposed to sing that but she has not sung that song. She sang Shurodhwani Bengali album in 2014. Mayuresh20 ( talk) 04:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
It's my own work (my own written piece) which I have written as a summary of Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon? And I had pasted on one website called India forums My username in India Forums is -Dellz - and it's my own work not copyrighted or plagiarized . So please allow me to post my own summary of the serial — Preceding unsigned comment added by DellzCreationz ( talk • contribs) 15:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello ,am Lazychick.maria from India Forums and my friend Dellz is the holder of it ,it's her summary.Mine it's just the banner I mean the pictures but its her work not my work .Am not the owner of it . Please don't involve me into this .Dellz my friend complained me about this and I was shocked seeing me getting involved when I didn't write anything . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweet.chocolate. ( talk • contribs) 08:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Kichappan has released his new version, Sauerstoffliebe. Back in Janatha Garage, re-ordering cast in favour of Mohanlal and has added a poster featuring Mohanlal. Not enough evidences for submitting a report. That's why I need your help.-- Charles Turing ( talk) 15:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Given the history and immediate jumping to another IP that has also been blocked for this same editorial and tag-teaming, I extended your block. Geographically close but netblock far, so we can't rangeblock:( DMacks ( talk) 21:07, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Do a collapsible list should be added in the template or infobox of an album-based article or should be removed? Because I didn't read anything in the Wikipedia guidelines if is appropriate to add a collapsible list in the template. I believe a collapsible list should only be used in the track listings, only if there are bonus tracks. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 19:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello. You have speedy deleted G5 this article, although G5 states "This applies to pages ... that have no substantial edits by others." I am fairly certain that I contributed more than 50% of this article. So can you please undelete it? Thanks and regards, Biwom ( talk) 10:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I saw your revert of LDMaster1998's edit on Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!, as I have been following both that page and that user since they've been adding hoax airdates to that particular article and others for a while now. I thought it might help/interest you to know that he has also used/is using IP 108.29.11.192 to make the same vandalistic edit to Be Cool, Scooby-Doo! and is vandalizing other pages using that IP as well. Not sure if that's useful/helpful to you at all, but I thought I should mention it as it appears you've been following this user as well for some time now. Cheers, Katniss ♥ 21:18, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Cyphoidbomb,
I have added new published sources as references for the "Early Life" section of
Priyadarshini Chatterjee which you deleted for having blogs as references. I have added new published sources as references to it. But I am unable to post it in the article as it appears to be blocked. Please revert the blocking so that I can add this to the article....and you can cross check it.
CyberBrinda ( talk) 01:29, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Sorry please can you tell me to how we can fix template because I'm new to Wikipedia i don't know what to fix and what not Parth1243 ( talk) 03:37, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps this is helpful for your recent SPI-request: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrdhimas/Archive The Banner talk 20:12, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
In these edits [12] [13] you removed a "Shitload" of boldface and italic formatting from the article. Someone have gone overboard with the emphasis and much of what was bolded and italicized should not have been. The only reason you found the page is because I had edited it last time. You should know that there were a "Shitload" of bold face and italics in that same page for many, many years. But you never knew about it, when I edited something, you found the faults.
You removed some sentences [14] [15] in the page Priyadarshini Chatterjee as you mentioned I have used blogs as references. Instead of removing the whole lot. You could have added "citation needed" to some sentences. But you deleted the entire paragraph. CyberBrinda [[[User:Parth1243|Parth1243]] ( talk) 03:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes it's my previous account please unblock I will follow the rules of Wikipedia and fix templates please unblock it widr has blocked IT Parth1243 ( talk) 07:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Why you blocked me 103.57.214.105 ( talk) 08:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello there. We all know that Finding Dory is a sequel to Finding Nemo because the events of the film take place after those of the latter. It seems possible that Finding Dory is also a spin-off of Finding Nemo because it centers on Dory who is not the main character of the first film. What do you think? 63.173.125.137 ( talk) 16:51, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
It's a very common phenomenon among entertainment articles that editors who only understand terms in context mis-apply them. (Don't get me started on what they do with also starring.) You might be able to make an argument for the Minions example, but that doesn't mean every film that features a character from another is a spin-off. It's a TV term. The media surrounding Finding Dory consistently referred to it as a sequel. If there's no reliable source that Andrew Stanton, the production company and the studio see it as a spin-off, the term is mis-applied. -- Drmargi ( talk) 22:49, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Not sure if it tingled your spidey senses but 5 minutes after Widr blocked the IP, Sarveshjoshi42 made the same edits, so it looks like block evasion. I notice that Sarveshjoshi42 has edited other articles in the same address pool as the IP. I've also mentioned this on Widr's talk page. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 21:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
When you're bored, have a look at the recent edits to List of The 100 episodes. I'm assuming it's the same editor, and he/she has made 78 edits to the article in less than 24 hours. So many edits, so little information. My watchlist went crazy. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 21:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Do you know if it's possible to change the phrasing of the tooltip, specifically after the contributions link? It's a bit confusing for me—like, I know and can figure it out eventually, but yeah, it's still a bit confusing. So instead of what's shown in the screenshot here, something like, "...blocked for 30 days by Widr - 3 minutes ago." It's mostly the "0:00 ago" that throws me off; everything else doesn't, really, I just think it looks better spelled out. Thanks in advance! Amaury ( talk | contribs) 16:39, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb, I need some help. I'm dealing with a user ( Honestmedia) who is inserting content that is WP:UNSOURCED (see Lester Holt and Martha Raddatz). I've tried explaining multiple times, along with another user ( UCO2009bluejay), that it must be cited. He is inserting the Holt is a Democrat, but according to the records (which he stated is where he's received his information), which also had to be pointed out by UCO2009bluejay in this edit, Holt is a Republican. Right now it isn't as to whether it is verifiable or not, it's a matter of whether or not Holt's a Democrat, which obviously he isn't (as shown in the link that has been provided to him). I know I've violated the 3RR, and I am done with editing for at least a day on the article, but after several attempts of trying to tell the other user that the content needed a reliable source in the article, he's still refusing to do so. Maybe you can get it through to their head or do something else; I don't know, but this is getting tiring. Thanks, Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 19:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
This issue appears to be about what constitutes a sufficient reference. Please consider this example to see my reasoning: If a page was about global warming, and I submitted content pointing out that "...according to public records which are kept by NOAA, the average ocean temperature went up by 1 degree in 2015." In that submission, the reference source is shown, and since it is public record it can be verified, and the source is on the page as an in-line attribution.
It appears from your talk message to me that if any user challenged that reference, even without first bothering to confirm it on his own, then a link to the specific NOAA document in which that statement can be seen must be included--or the statement must be deleted.
Wouldn't such a rule easily be abused by a user who could then go through any page in Wikipedia and challenge every statement appearing without a link? All any user would have to do to bring Wikipedia to a grinding halt, is to challenge every statement on any page--even including those with stated references that can be verified--without ever even having to do some research to confirm them on his own.
Looking at the Lester Holt and Martha Raddatz pages for example, this user who is engaging in a editing war with me could just as easily challenge all of the many, many statements in those pages that appear without a link or even a reference. The effect would be to shut down those pages or at least gut them by removing most of the information in them. Honestmedia ( talk) 03:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
plz tell me how can I add the naagin season 2 story plot properly thanks Kasamterepyar ki ( talk) 18:07, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Kasamterepyar ki ( talk) 18:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
As predicted, more sockpuppetry from Vicky12333. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 02:25, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
And change in "Ek That Tiger" was a typing error.
Hemant Dabral Talk 00:40, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
It's not about ethnic war or anything else. It's what the factual referrece says in the cited website. I just added the figure shown on the weblink.
Hemant Dabral Talk 00:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
It's ok, I'm not editing it anymore. I don't want any troubles. I'll edit only if I see grammatical errors. Just minor edits. I don't want to start edit wars.
Hemant Dabral Talk 02:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Cyphoidbomb. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review
the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'
mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Darth Vader#Appearances section. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 17:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
OK, now we have multiple WP:RSs to support the fact that Trump claimed Lester Holt is a Democrat and news media report that he is a registered Republican. But one editor still reverted it, apparently based on reasons that don't comply with Wikipedia guidelines and policies, and I don't want to get into an edit war. Could you take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Lester_Holt&type=revision&diff=741050538&oldid=741050489 and /info/en/?search=Talk:Lester_Holt#Which_side_is_he_on.3F_Who_cares. and tell us in the Talk page what Wikipedia policy says we should do? -- Nbauman ( talk) 22:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb, I just wanted to bring to your attention that LDMaster1998 is doing the exact same thing again that you blocked him for a few weeks ago. Would suggest maybe an indef, since he seems to have learned absolutely nothing from his block? Cheers, Katniss ♥ 14:37, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you please check out this editor User:Zainlatif12 as they have been removing genuine references and replacing them with spam links to an irrevelant song lyrics site, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 14:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Pearll's Sun TALK 20:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
NIKE 01 is vandalising Allu Arjun 's films. He deleted many sources for Sarrainodu in the past. He is doing the same for Duvvada Jagannadham. PhysicsScientist ( talk) 16:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Just want you to know that a few small changes will be implement to MOS:TV, based on the most recent rewrite discussion, in case you would like to voice any opinions regarding them before they are implemented. Once those are done, the next section to cover will be the first "Image" section, with the first "Lead" section and everyone's favorite topic, "Plot", on deck. - Favre1fan93 ( talk) 05:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hey, Cyphoidbomb, have you ever considered being a bareucrat? Foxnpichu ( talk) 19:25, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Cyphoidbomb! I can you block this article from other users (including me) to move the article without permission at WP:RM/TR, and only allowed administrators to move the page. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 18:36, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Could you also tag this (already blocked) account once you get the chance? I'm assuming the master is obvious by now... 2601:1C0:4401:F360:28AA:8490:C872:4D54 ( talk) 01:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
It's a different thing here on Philippine TV. We don't usually have that 'season' thing. So we group episodes by months or by book number. Just like the other LoE articles of Philippine TV. You can just go here to find out the difference. /info/en/?search=Category:Lists_of_Philippine_television_series_episodes. Philippine TV has its own format of LoE and does not follow US style. Hope it's clear! Thanks! Leo kingston ( talk) 05:00, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Looks like the user, Viper18184, you blocked for vandalism has created another account, Randyortan12 [17].-- Charles Turing ( talk) 09:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)