![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Wachowskis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cloud Atlas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article
Riverside and Avondale you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
Teb00007 --
Teb00007 (
talk) 03:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
You said "obvious to uninvolved editors" - such is obvious to involved editors too. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 15:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Cuchullain. Hijiri88 here. Long time no see! I'm editing under a proxy username in order to keep JoshuSasori off my back for at least the next few days. Anyway, just thought I should mention that I brought your name up in my ANI posting. Cheers! Coldman the Barbarian ( talk) 12:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Coldman the Barbarian ( talk) 11:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
The article
Riverside and Avondale you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Riverside and Avondale for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
Teb00007 --
Teb00007 (
talk) 19:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Did I file this wrong? Although, by calling me Trollvenlout, he's already admitted to being a sock, so ... Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 11:36, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacksonville Bullets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skating rink ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
I need help with article for Mr.CAP of the South Park Coalition. Thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bjoyce1/sandbox Bjoyce1 ( talk) 06:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
It was fine for you to boldly move
Temple Beth-El (Pensacola, Florida) to your preferred title
Temple Beth-El (Pensacola)... but to move it a second time after someone (me) reverted your move is considered disruptive. It's called Move-Warring. Once it was clear that someone objected to your first move, you should have either opened discussion on the talk page, or filed an RM. (I'll take care of that).
Blueboar (
talk) 17:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there C, how are you doing? Well I hope. Since I messed up the template last time, can you help again? Same pattern again, random article generator to establish history, then verbatim into old editing habits removed Viettext warning template, dictionary citation about Han-Nom, citing Britannia and VN newswires against diacritics (article K moved and redirect locked). In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:08, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Cuchullain, I'm a newbie to Wikipedia and so am coming to you for advice and guidance. I entered edits to a webpage named Tlachtga last night but today when I went to show them to someone else they'd disappeared.
I appreciate that I may have something wrong in the edits I made last night and am hoping you might be able to advise me as to what they are, what protocols if any I have messed up and how to go about making the edits we would like to include. We have additional information to add today in preparation of the Fire Festival in October and so know that many worldwide will be Google-ing for information.
Can you help? Best regards, Sinead TheRealTlachtga ( talk) 14:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Towne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Towne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smarkflea ( talk) 21:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey CC, long time no see :D
Anyway, I noticed you closed as "No move", but in fact there was no opposition to any of the moves other than the main Jinmu one (Necrothesp specifically stated that he had no problem with the others). Also you closed before Oda Mari had a chance to see my response to them (they almost certainly would have changed their !vote given the context).
Honestly I'm very tired of that RM right now, so I'm not going back there (or to Tamba province) for a while at least. Also, posting more than one RM at a time has made me confused as all hell over whether the Empress Jingū is also called Empress Jingu, and if so why. (By the way, this paragraph is not canvassing, just my weak attempt at humour. Last time I requested someone to post there it had the opposite effect I anticipated anyway. Wikipedia got weird while I was away, it seems.)
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 14:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Excellent additions to the Fairview, Christian County, Kentucky article! I am working on taking Jefferson Davis to FA, hence my interest in Fairview. I also wanted to let you know that I used some of the relevant text on the Bethel Baptist Church (Fairview, Kentucky) article. Omnedon ( talk) 17:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Template:JTA Skyway Nav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Sw2nd (
talk) 22:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please check out the moves that just happened for MNM (wrestling)? They seem to be contrary to the consensus in the recent RM that you closed recently (as recorded at Talk:MNM (wrestling). I tried to revert but was unable to do so. I also notice that the same user ( McPhail) seems to be moving a lot of other pages. I also left a note on that user's Talk page. — BarrelProof ( talk) 20:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm glad to see you are still here, Cuchullain. Please could you take a look at the new article Dinas Affaraon? I've commented on the Discussion page. This belongs in a category like "Lewis Spence's laughably absurd misinterpretations of Celtic myth and legend" rather than Welsh mythology and Welsh culture. Cofion gorau / best wishes, " GreatSoul" (migrated to other places, just dropping by...). 79.66.95.58 ( talk) 22:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello there, Cuchullain. A few months ago you helped me with a revision to The Art Institutes article and I wanted to ask if you have time to take a look at a proposed revision I've prepared for another article related to Education Management Corporation, Argosy University. I'd like to remind you that I am a paid consultant to EDMC and am working on their behalf to improve this article.
I had hoped to find help elsewhere, but my messages on the Talk page, with a previously involved editor, and at WikiProject Universities have not received a response. The other WikiProjects listed on the Talk page are all very tangentially related; they mostly appear to be WikiProjects for some of the states where Argosy University campuses are located, so I'm not sure where best to take this request.
If you do have the time and interest in reviewing my proposed draft please take a look at the message I've posted on the article's Talk page, where I explain my proposed changes, and provide links to compare versions. Cheers, WWB Too ( Talk · COI) 14:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() As a member of WikiProject Wales, WikiProject Cardiff or an user who has contributed to Welsh articles we invite you to contribute to a new project, Living Paths!: articles, images, translations... Lonely Planet rated the coast of Wales "the best region on Earth" in 2012, yet there is a very low number of articles on the history and culture of places along the Coastal Path. This promises to be an exciting project as it gathers momentum with many Users joining in across the world. |
If you are interested in training groups in Wales, please leave a message on the
Talk Page. |
Cymrodor ( talk) 11:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Do you want to reconsider your closure or shall we move direct to move review? Cheers. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 19:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
I agree that Richhoncho doesn't seem to be following proper due process here – that was not a candidate for an "uncontroversial" move. But I also don't see quite how you could properly find a consensus to move to that partially disambiguated "(song)" title in that move discussion. I also find it a bit disappointing that you're the one who took that particular closing action, against a 4:2 majority of participants in the discussion (4:1 in terms of those who explicitly expressed a preference between the PDAB and full dab), just a few days after closing Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2013 August#On My Way (song) (closed) and after WP:DAB was modified to clarify that what counts is not whether "there aren't any other articles", but simply whether a subject exists anywhere on Wikipedia or not (regardless of whether it exists as an article or as a secondary item within another article – please see also the related discussion at WT:DAB). The example provided at WP:PDAB is an album, but songs pose the same basic situation. To me, it is really silly for us to collectively try to establish whether one particular parenthetically disambiguated song is more primary than another candidate song (especially when none of the songs are covered in much real depth), when we can instead just use "(Artist X song)" as an article title instead of attempting to truncate it to just "(song)", thereby forcing ourselves to struggle over whose song we might want to pick as the primary song among several (3 in the case of " Good for Me"). — BarrelProof ( talk) 04:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
You may want to compare your actions with Talk:Doin' It (Liberty X song). Closed as one thing then immediately moved. Yep. Familiar? Controversial? -- Richhoncho ( talk) 21:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Also, I want to apologize to both of you for not being very timely with my responses the last few days. There's been a lot going on, on Wikipedia and especially off it. Please do know I'm reading and considering the comments and will make every effort to respond as quickly and effectively as I'm able. Cheers,-- Cúchullain t/ c 14:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
You'll have seen that one of the latest socks named itself after a Dublin real world address. You may wish to history-remove some comments I have (not knowing all the background) made along with some of the sock's User page history. In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Will you please remain WP:CIVIL in your comments, in particular when addressing a user with few edits? Should I remind you that there are behavioral policies as well as content policies, and that you don't need to answer each comment you disagree with? Please contribute to create a sane environment to discuss the topic calmly, by keeping hostility low. Diego ( talk) 19:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Excuse me, but didn't we just have a Talk page discussion and decide not to move " Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series)" to " Upstairs, Downstairs", with just about everyone commenting that a comma wasn't sufficient to distinguish one topic from the others that are listed on the " Upstairs Downstairs" dab page? — BarrelProof ( talk) 04:28, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Carpi FC 1909. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. CapPixel ( talk) 14:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Zidek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlotte Hornets ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
San Marco (Jacksonville) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Quadell --
Quadell (
talk) 19:32, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
The article
San Marco (Jacksonville) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:San Marco (Jacksonville) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Quadell --
Quadell (
talk) 21:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Harold S. Bucquet may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:48, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1930 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Without Love ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
I have created a closing script for move reviews, which can found at User:Armbrust/closemrv.js. If you want to use it, than simply add
importScript('User:Armbrust/closemrv.js');
to your
vector JS page and
bypass your cache. (Not tested on
monobook or
modern either.) Regards,
Armbrust
The Homunculus 02:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
You received this message because you closed at least one MRV discussion in the last six months.
Looking back at the edit history, it seems I'm not the first person to try to correct this page. Osceola and Renegade are NOT mascots. It is not a matter of FSU jargon; symbol is not some obscure word that Wikipedia readers can't understand. In their thirty five years representing FSU, they have never been mascots. You wrote that they are the "official mascots" of Florida State University. Clearly they are not. How can they possibly be the "official mascots" when the University does not recognize them as such?
The sources that call them mascots are incorrect. It is the school that chooses its mascot; if the school does not call something its mascot, then it is not the mascot. It seems rather simple. Whether a few reporters have figured that out or not doesn't change the matter. Reporters have been wrong before. If a reporter started calling them the Florida State Cherokee, the team's not going to change their name because of it. Many people call Osceola and Renegade mascots. They also call him Chief Osceola, another common misconception that I found in the article (thanks for not changing that one back). However, there is no logical reason that you, though you clearly know the history and that they are not mascots, should continue to change it back. That's my last on the matter, as it was rather random that I came across the page and wanted to change it. I do not have the time to go back and forth with you, as has happened in previous edits, but I hope you will think about the reason you are so adamant in calling them mascots. The sources you cite are secondary; go to the school as a primary source. Wikipedia is a great resource and continually reversing a necessary change only interferes with the purpose.
P.S. FSU does have a mascot; it's a goofy horse wearing shorts named Cimarron. Write an article about him if you must talk about mascots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristenhausman ( talk • contribs) 22:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
mentioned you here. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
User:RoslynSKP has put forward an additional move request for ANZAC Mounted Division ( Talk:ANZAC_Mounted_Division#Requested_Move_4). I procedurally closed the third discussion on the basis that the move review was fairly concluded. This user doesn't appear to want to listen. I would close the 4th RM myself but I think ti would be better if an administrator did so. i am posting an ANI separately because I think this is getting ridiculous. -- Labattblueboy ( talk) 11:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Ladies and gents! The disambiguation page is now undeleted as a result of the recent deletion review. Therefore, I invite you to particapte in the move discussion. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Please reconsider the way you have implemented the move consensus. The proposal was to rename the article as Lorca, Spain to avoid surprise to readers, not to substitute the article with a disambiguation page. Given that there are no other articles titled "Lorca" in Wikipedia, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC doesn't provide insight on how to handle this exceptional situation, so the consensus at the talk page was to handle in an specific way that improves navigation for all readers. The number of people reading the town article is higher than the people using the hatnote to the poet, so the DAB page at the base name for the town (which is not shared by other articles) is not the best structure at this particular case. Diego ( talk) 13:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
We have an editor creating sections such as Citrus County, Florida#Library which I think is inappropriate, what do you think? Dougweller ( talk) 17:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
I put in a RM2 on a RM you closed back in May but which today was cited as precedent for a similar move. I have comment on the previous RM, though more on contributions than closer. Stats now show that the move was a bad one. Hope this is okay, way too old/cold for a move review. In ictu oculi ( talk) 21:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Clas Myrddin? Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 16:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
I was wondering if you were aware that A Nightmare on Elm Street (disambiguation) was deleted in a previous AfD discussion? I am inclined to nominate the page for deletion as an unnecessary recreation of previously deleted content. bd2412 T 16:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
You'd mentioned on talk discussion you'd be willing to share the entire Nate Carpenter article on request. I apologize if I drew conclusions without reading the article myself, but I hold sufficient sources have been provided to pass the GNG bar. Disagreement is normal here on the pedia, and I hope we can continue to work together to build the best possible online encyclopedia. BusterD ( talk) 00:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
I just ran into an edit conflict with you. Can you let me know when you will be off the article for a while? I'll wait to see if there is anything I still want to add after you are done. -- Donald Albury 15:10, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
You deleted this on the grounds of already being at AFC, but the process was finished there. Then the author posted it (again) to the main article space, whereupon I was going to have it deleted again on the grounds of non-notability again—except that I then noticed that five of his references were (as far as I can tell) from independent sources. He just didn't create the references correctly, and put Dan Kindlon's name where the name of each of the referenced sources was supposed to go, making it look as though there were only primary sources. See my notes to him at User talk:Sewaneegender in which I chided him for having inadvertently been the cause of his own difficulties, and hoping (though apparently unsuccessfully) to goad him into fixing the references. It seems to me that the man is notable after all, and the trip to AFC was a wild goose chase. What do you think? —Largo Plazo ( talk) 19:48, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yustaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ceramics ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
I've nominated Bangerz for retargeting at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 6#Bangerz. Since you participated in the RM discussion for Bangerz (album), you may be interested in commenting on this proposal. -- BDD ( talk) 18:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Wachowskis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cloud Atlas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article
Riverside and Avondale you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
Teb00007 --
Teb00007 (
talk) 03:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
You said "obvious to uninvolved editors" - such is obvious to involved editors too. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 15:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Cuchullain. Hijiri88 here. Long time no see! I'm editing under a proxy username in order to keep JoshuSasori off my back for at least the next few days. Anyway, just thought I should mention that I brought your name up in my ANI posting. Cheers! Coldman the Barbarian ( talk) 12:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Coldman the Barbarian ( talk) 11:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
The article
Riverside and Avondale you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Riverside and Avondale for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
GA bot, on behalf of
Teb00007 --
Teb00007 (
talk) 19:18, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Did I file this wrong? Although, by calling me Trollvenlout, he's already admitted to being a sock, so ... Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 11:36, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jacksonville Bullets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skating rink ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
I need help with article for Mr.CAP of the South Park Coalition. Thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bjoyce1/sandbox Bjoyce1 ( talk) 06:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
It was fine for you to boldly move
Temple Beth-El (Pensacola, Florida) to your preferred title
Temple Beth-El (Pensacola)... but to move it a second time after someone (me) reverted your move is considered disruptive. It's called Move-Warring. Once it was clear that someone objected to your first move, you should have either opened discussion on the talk page, or filed an RM. (I'll take care of that).
Blueboar (
talk) 17:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there C, how are you doing? Well I hope. Since I messed up the template last time, can you help again? Same pattern again, random article generator to establish history, then verbatim into old editing habits removed Viettext warning template, dictionary citation about Han-Nom, citing Britannia and VN newswires against diacritics (article K moved and redirect locked). In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:08, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Cuchullain, I'm a newbie to Wikipedia and so am coming to you for advice and guidance. I entered edits to a webpage named Tlachtga last night but today when I went to show them to someone else they'd disappeared.
I appreciate that I may have something wrong in the edits I made last night and am hoping you might be able to advise me as to what they are, what protocols if any I have messed up and how to go about making the edits we would like to include. We have additional information to add today in preparation of the Fire Festival in October and so know that many worldwide will be Google-ing for information.
Can you help? Best regards, Sinead TheRealTlachtga ( talk) 14:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Towne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Towne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smarkflea ( talk) 21:26, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey CC, long time no see :D
Anyway, I noticed you closed as "No move", but in fact there was no opposition to any of the moves other than the main Jinmu one (Necrothesp specifically stated that he had no problem with the others). Also you closed before Oda Mari had a chance to see my response to them (they almost certainly would have changed their !vote given the context).
Honestly I'm very tired of that RM right now, so I'm not going back there (or to Tamba province) for a while at least. Also, posting more than one RM at a time has made me confused as all hell over whether the Empress Jingū is also called Empress Jingu, and if so why. (By the way, this paragraph is not canvassing, just my weak attempt at humour. Last time I requested someone to post there it had the opposite effect I anticipated anyway. Wikipedia got weird while I was away, it seems.)
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 14:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Excellent additions to the Fairview, Christian County, Kentucky article! I am working on taking Jefferson Davis to FA, hence my interest in Fairview. I also wanted to let you know that I used some of the relevant text on the Bethel Baptist Church (Fairview, Kentucky) article. Omnedon ( talk) 17:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Template:JTA Skyway Nav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Sw2nd (
talk) 22:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please check out the moves that just happened for MNM (wrestling)? They seem to be contrary to the consensus in the recent RM that you closed recently (as recorded at Talk:MNM (wrestling). I tried to revert but was unable to do so. I also notice that the same user ( McPhail) seems to be moving a lot of other pages. I also left a note on that user's Talk page. — BarrelProof ( talk) 20:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm glad to see you are still here, Cuchullain. Please could you take a look at the new article Dinas Affaraon? I've commented on the Discussion page. This belongs in a category like "Lewis Spence's laughably absurd misinterpretations of Celtic myth and legend" rather than Welsh mythology and Welsh culture. Cofion gorau / best wishes, " GreatSoul" (migrated to other places, just dropping by...). 79.66.95.58 ( talk) 22:04, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello there, Cuchullain. A few months ago you helped me with a revision to The Art Institutes article and I wanted to ask if you have time to take a look at a proposed revision I've prepared for another article related to Education Management Corporation, Argosy University. I'd like to remind you that I am a paid consultant to EDMC and am working on their behalf to improve this article.
I had hoped to find help elsewhere, but my messages on the Talk page, with a previously involved editor, and at WikiProject Universities have not received a response. The other WikiProjects listed on the Talk page are all very tangentially related; they mostly appear to be WikiProjects for some of the states where Argosy University campuses are located, so I'm not sure where best to take this request.
If you do have the time and interest in reviewing my proposed draft please take a look at the message I've posted on the article's Talk page, where I explain my proposed changes, and provide links to compare versions. Cheers, WWB Too ( Talk · COI) 14:31, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() As a member of WikiProject Wales, WikiProject Cardiff or an user who has contributed to Welsh articles we invite you to contribute to a new project, Living Paths!: articles, images, translations... Lonely Planet rated the coast of Wales "the best region on Earth" in 2012, yet there is a very low number of articles on the history and culture of places along the Coastal Path. This promises to be an exciting project as it gathers momentum with many Users joining in across the world. |
If you are interested in training groups in Wales, please leave a message on the
Talk Page. |
Cymrodor ( talk) 11:45, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Do you want to reconsider your closure or shall we move direct to move review? Cheers. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 19:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
I agree that Richhoncho doesn't seem to be following proper due process here – that was not a candidate for an "uncontroversial" move. But I also don't see quite how you could properly find a consensus to move to that partially disambiguated "(song)" title in that move discussion. I also find it a bit disappointing that you're the one who took that particular closing action, against a 4:2 majority of participants in the discussion (4:1 in terms of those who explicitly expressed a preference between the PDAB and full dab), just a few days after closing Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2013 August#On My Way (song) (closed) and after WP:DAB was modified to clarify that what counts is not whether "there aren't any other articles", but simply whether a subject exists anywhere on Wikipedia or not (regardless of whether it exists as an article or as a secondary item within another article – please see also the related discussion at WT:DAB). The example provided at WP:PDAB is an album, but songs pose the same basic situation. To me, it is really silly for us to collectively try to establish whether one particular parenthetically disambiguated song is more primary than another candidate song (especially when none of the songs are covered in much real depth), when we can instead just use "(Artist X song)" as an article title instead of attempting to truncate it to just "(song)", thereby forcing ourselves to struggle over whose song we might want to pick as the primary song among several (3 in the case of " Good for Me"). — BarrelProof ( talk) 04:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
You may want to compare your actions with Talk:Doin' It (Liberty X song). Closed as one thing then immediately moved. Yep. Familiar? Controversial? -- Richhoncho ( talk) 21:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Also, I want to apologize to both of you for not being very timely with my responses the last few days. There's been a lot going on, on Wikipedia and especially off it. Please do know I'm reading and considering the comments and will make every effort to respond as quickly and effectively as I'm able. Cheers,-- Cúchullain t/ c 14:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
You'll have seen that one of the latest socks named itself after a Dublin real world address. You may wish to history-remove some comments I have (not knowing all the background) made along with some of the sock's User page history. In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Will you please remain WP:CIVIL in your comments, in particular when addressing a user with few edits? Should I remind you that there are behavioral policies as well as content policies, and that you don't need to answer each comment you disagree with? Please contribute to create a sane environment to discuss the topic calmly, by keeping hostility low. Diego ( talk) 19:21, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Excuse me, but didn't we just have a Talk page discussion and decide not to move " Upstairs, Downstairs (1971 TV series)" to " Upstairs, Downstairs", with just about everyone commenting that a comma wasn't sufficient to distinguish one topic from the others that are listed on the " Upstairs Downstairs" dab page? — BarrelProof ( talk) 04:28, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Carpi FC 1909. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. CapPixel ( talk) 14:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Zidek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlotte Hornets ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
San Marco (Jacksonville) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Quadell --
Quadell (
talk) 19:32, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
The article
San Marco (Jacksonville) you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:San Marco (Jacksonville) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Quadell --
Quadell (
talk) 21:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Harold S. Bucquet may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:48, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1930 in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Without Love ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
I have created a closing script for move reviews, which can found at User:Armbrust/closemrv.js. If you want to use it, than simply add
importScript('User:Armbrust/closemrv.js');
to your
vector JS page and
bypass your cache. (Not tested on
monobook or
modern either.) Regards,
Armbrust
The Homunculus 02:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
You received this message because you closed at least one MRV discussion in the last six months.
Looking back at the edit history, it seems I'm not the first person to try to correct this page. Osceola and Renegade are NOT mascots. It is not a matter of FSU jargon; symbol is not some obscure word that Wikipedia readers can't understand. In their thirty five years representing FSU, they have never been mascots. You wrote that they are the "official mascots" of Florida State University. Clearly they are not. How can they possibly be the "official mascots" when the University does not recognize them as such?
The sources that call them mascots are incorrect. It is the school that chooses its mascot; if the school does not call something its mascot, then it is not the mascot. It seems rather simple. Whether a few reporters have figured that out or not doesn't change the matter. Reporters have been wrong before. If a reporter started calling them the Florida State Cherokee, the team's not going to change their name because of it. Many people call Osceola and Renegade mascots. They also call him Chief Osceola, another common misconception that I found in the article (thanks for not changing that one back). However, there is no logical reason that you, though you clearly know the history and that they are not mascots, should continue to change it back. That's my last on the matter, as it was rather random that I came across the page and wanted to change it. I do not have the time to go back and forth with you, as has happened in previous edits, but I hope you will think about the reason you are so adamant in calling them mascots. The sources you cite are secondary; go to the school as a primary source. Wikipedia is a great resource and continually reversing a necessary change only interferes with the purpose.
P.S. FSU does have a mascot; it's a goofy horse wearing shorts named Cimarron. Write an article about him if you must talk about mascots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristenhausman ( talk • contribs) 22:42, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
mentioned you here. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 13:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
User:RoslynSKP has put forward an additional move request for ANZAC Mounted Division ( Talk:ANZAC_Mounted_Division#Requested_Move_4). I procedurally closed the third discussion on the basis that the move review was fairly concluded. This user doesn't appear to want to listen. I would close the 4th RM myself but I think ti would be better if an administrator did so. i am posting an ANI separately because I think this is getting ridiculous. -- Labattblueboy ( talk) 11:34, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Ladies and gents! The disambiguation page is now undeleted as a result of the recent deletion review. Therefore, I invite you to particapte in the move discussion. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:51, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Please reconsider the way you have implemented the move consensus. The proposal was to rename the article as Lorca, Spain to avoid surprise to readers, not to substitute the article with a disambiguation page. Given that there are no other articles titled "Lorca" in Wikipedia, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC doesn't provide insight on how to handle this exceptional situation, so the consensus at the talk page was to handle in an specific way that improves navigation for all readers. The number of people reading the town article is higher than the people using the hatnote to the poet, so the DAB page at the base name for the town (which is not shared by other articles) is not the best structure at this particular case. Diego ( talk) 13:40, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
We have an editor creating sections such as Citrus County, Florida#Library which I think is inappropriate, what do you think? Dougweller ( talk) 17:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
I put in a RM2 on a RM you closed back in May but which today was cited as precedent for a similar move. I have comment on the previous RM, though more on contributions than closer. Stats now show that the move was a bad one. Hope this is okay, way too old/cold for a move review. In ictu oculi ( talk) 21:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Clas Myrddin? Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 16:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
I was wondering if you were aware that A Nightmare on Elm Street (disambiguation) was deleted in a previous AfD discussion? I am inclined to nominate the page for deletion as an unnecessary recreation of previously deleted content. bd2412 T 16:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
You'd mentioned on talk discussion you'd be willing to share the entire Nate Carpenter article on request. I apologize if I drew conclusions without reading the article myself, but I hold sufficient sources have been provided to pass the GNG bar. Disagreement is normal here on the pedia, and I hope we can continue to work together to build the best possible online encyclopedia. BusterD ( talk) 00:45, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
I just ran into an edit conflict with you. Can you let me know when you will be off the article for a while? I'll wait to see if there is anything I still want to add after you are done. -- Donald Albury 15:10, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
You deleted this on the grounds of already being at AFC, but the process was finished there. Then the author posted it (again) to the main article space, whereupon I was going to have it deleted again on the grounds of non-notability again—except that I then noticed that five of his references were (as far as I can tell) from independent sources. He just didn't create the references correctly, and put Dan Kindlon's name where the name of each of the referenced sources was supposed to go, making it look as though there were only primary sources. See my notes to him at User talk:Sewaneegender in which I chided him for having inadvertently been the cause of his own difficulties, and hoping (though apparently unsuccessfully) to goad him into fixing the references. It seems to me that the man is notable after all, and the trip to AFC was a wild goose chase. What do you think? —Largo Plazo ( talk) 19:48, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yustaga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ceramics ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
I've nominated Bangerz for retargeting at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November 6#Bangerz. Since you participated in the RM discussion for Bangerz (album), you may be interested in commenting on this proposal. -- BDD ( talk) 18:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)